On 2019-06-24 20:16, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 24/Jun/19 16:11, Job Snijders wrote:
>
>>
>> - deploy RPKI based BGP Origin validation (with invalid == reject)
>> - apply maximum prefix limits on all EBGP sessions
>> - ask your router vendor to comply with RFC 8212 ('default deny')
>
On 2018-11-25 21:16, Mike Hammett wrote:
> No, not new. No need to buy new switches when there are so many used
> available (except for now needing 100G). Switches
> have an extremely long life. I have a client that has 15 year old Foundry
> switches that just work, though we're looking
> to repl
On 2018-07-09 17:24, Fredrik Korsbäck wrote:
> On 2018-07-06 21:18, Tom Paseka via NANOG wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been casually observing the connectivity to Bitcanal / AS3266 /
>> AS197426 since the thread started.
>>
>> After GTT shared that bitca
On 2018-07-06 21:18, Tom Paseka via NANOG wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been casually observing the connectivity to Bitcanal / AS3266 /
> AS197426 since the thread started.
>
> After GTT shared that bitcanal had been disconnected, bitcanal was only
> visible behind Cogent. But the Cogent path now also se
correct me on this
one) with 10297 and hence poisoned the
8.8.8.8 resolver for some time with the wrong ip-addr.
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:35:17PM +0200,
> Fredrik Korsbäck wrote
> a message of 28 lines which said:
>
>> Surprised this hasnt "made the news" over a
icy looks
like towards your customers? I typically
base my peering-relationships on people/operators that i have some kind of
level of trust in.
> Is MyEtherWallet really doing 500k/hr in business though?
>
>> On Apr 24, 2018, at 2:35 PM, Fredrik Korsbäck wrote:
>>
>> Aloh
Aloha.
Surprised this hasnt "made the news" over at this list yet.
https://doublepulsar.com/hijack-of-amazons-internet-domain-service-used-to-reroute-web-traffic-for-two-hours-unnoticed-3a6f0dda6a6f
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/2teeVLJ44RM/Yqk5GHSpCQAJ
https
On 2018-03-13 00:24, mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> Howdy!
>
> Checking out various Netflow tools and wanted to see what others are using?
>
> Kentik is cool. Are they the only SaaS based flow digester? I don’t seem to
> see any others.
>
> Also curious about on-prem solutions as well.
>
> Than
On 2018-03-05 04:20, Brian Kantor wrote:
> Does anyone have contact info for the peering folks at
> AS1880, Svensk Teleutveckling & Produktinnovation in Sweden?
>
> They appear to be advertising a subnet of our network
> space without permission. Their WHOIS entry at RIPE does
> not list any cont
On 2018-01-13 03:26, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 5:20 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:28:19 -0500, William Herrin said:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Dale W. Carder wrote:
Traceroute or any other path diagnostics comes to mind.
That's not obvious to me. Assumi
Depends on what "legitimate" means.
We have a decent amount of traffic to the network (like 2Gbps sustained in any afternoon). Its typically a mix of
bittorrent, tor-relay traffic, ftp-transfers and of course the expected scanners, malware-hosts, ddos-bots and such.
For me Poney/Illiad/Online.
> 19 dec. 2017 kl. 19:24 skrev Sabri Berisha :
>
> - On Dec 18, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Fredrik Korsbäck hu...@nordu.net wrote:
>
>> This is the "failure" of us (the business) choosing QSFP as the de-factor
>> formfactor for 100G, there is not power in
>> t
This is the "failure" of us (the business) choosing QSFP as the de-factor formfactor for 100G, there is not power in
that cage to make 10km+ optics in an easy way. If we would have pushed for CFP4 as the "last" formfactor in 100G land we
would be much better off.
The options you have to choose
On 2017-11-30 19:36, Romeo Czumbil wrote:
So I've been using Arista as layer2 for quite some time, and I'm pretty happy
with them.
Kicking the idea around to turn on some Layer3 features but I've been hearing
some negative feedback.
The people that I did hear negative feedback don't use Arista
On 2017-11-19 02:55, mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy!
Looking to replace some edge routers for my small ISP. With all the various SDN
platforms available along with various choices of bare-metal hardware
platforms, im thinking i may go this route instead of going with
Cisco/Juniper/Etc.
I o
On 2017-10-12 07:01, James Breeden wrote:
Hello NANOG...
I have a client interested in picking up a new AS number but they really want
it to be 3 or 4 digits in length.
Is there a process to request this from ARIN, or doss anyone know of unused
ASns fitting this that anyone is looking to sell
The only viable merchant silicon chip that would be useful for a IXP is from
the StrataDNX-family which house the jericho/qumran/petra/arad chips from
broadcom. No packetbuffer in the exhangepoint will shred performance
significantly, especially when one of your bursty 100G customers starts send
How well does this service work? I understand it usually involves
point-to-multipoint Switched Ethernet with VLANs and resold IX ports. Sounds
like a service for ISP that would like to peer, but have relatively small
volumes for peering purposes or lopsided volumes.
Roderick Beck
Director of
On 14/04/17 15:51, David Hubbard wrote:
> Hey all, have some Brocade MLXe’s that can no longer handle a full v4 and v6
> route table while also having VRF support (dumb CAM profile limitations in
> the software). Mine don’t do anything fancy; just BGP to a few upstream
> peers and OSPF/OSPFv3 t
On 21/09/16 11:53, Mel Beckman wrote:
> This is a very comprehensive article, and worth handing out to techs. I have
> one comment on Balder’s OTDR suggestion, and one on the article’s microscope
> instructions.
>
> Although it certainly can’t hurt to run an OTDR test (except for extended
> dow
On 18/08/16 14:45, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 18/Aug/16 14:42, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
>>
>> It is always better to clarify this sort of thing with the account
>> management team before purchasing, and preferably have it in email or
>> writing. After that, the best approach is to ask support and
On 18/08/16 13:29, Dovid Bender wrote:
> And I was about to jump on to the Arista train.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dovid
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stanislaw
> Sender: "NANOG" Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:24:05
> To: nanog list
> Subject: Re: Arista unqualified SFP
>
> Hi all,
> If somebo
On 17/06/16 01:09, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have studied Netnod extensively because we want to become members, but we
> can not simply because it is too expensive. I just signed a deal with he.net
> for a flatrate 10G transit for about the same as the 10G Comix port cost.
> The differenc
On 03/05/16 21:23, Marco Paesani wrote:
> Hi Arnold,
> nobody answer at 'peer...@green.ch' for this reason I write here on NANOG.
> Ciao,
>
>
> Marco Paesani
>
>
> Skype: mpaesani
> Mobile: +39 348 6019349
> Success depends on the right choice !
> Email: ma...@paesani.it
>
Marco.
As I've tol
On 18/04/16 20:01, Colton Conor wrote:
> As a follow up to this post, it look like the Arista 7500R series has this
> new chip inside of it.
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jeff Tantsura
> wrote:
>
>> That's right, logic is in programming chips, not their property. You just
>> need to know
On 11/02/16 00:34, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> I quoted a PCH peering paper at the Peering Track. (Not violating rules,
> talking about myself.)
>
> The paper is:
>
> https://www.pch.net/resources/Papers/peering-survey/PCH-Peering-Survey-2011.pdf
>
> I said “99.97%” of all peering session
26 matches
Mail list logo