On Aug 26, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
On Aug 22, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
Bryan-
Those points all sound good to me.
On Aug 22, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Bryan Noll wrote:
Thanks Craig for the link...
So... having caught up on that thread, seems like the follo
On Aug 22, 2006, at 10:43 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
Bryan-
Those points all sound good to me.
On Aug 22, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Bryan Noll wrote:
Thanks Craig for the link...
So... having caught up on that thread, seems like the following
are the key points:
1. People seem to like th
Bryan-
Those points all sound good to me.
On Aug 22, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Bryan Noll wrote:
Thanks Craig for the link...
So... having caught up on that thread, seems like the following are
the key points:
1. People seem to like the easiness of wiki editing for the main
site. (If wiki
Thanks Craig for the link...
So... having caught up on that thread, seems like the following are the
key points:
1. People seem to like the easiness of wiki editing for the main
site. (If wiki content is specific to a particular release, it
would just be identified as such, much li
Hi Bryan,
The thread named "staging of site changes" dated 25-July is the
thread to which I referred. It has some expressed points of view but
no conclusion.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-open-jpa-dev/
200607.mbox/thread
Craig
On Aug 22, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Bryan Noll
I'm having a hard time tracking down the thread regarding the discussion
about where the site and docs should be kept. Would someone mind
replying with a URL? I'd like to first go catch up on that, and then
maybe push for a decision from the community so we can move ahead.
Thanks...
Marc P
> My original idea was to generate the documentation from its current
> location (at openjpa-project/src/doc/manual/manual.xml), and
> generate
> the site and docs together using the "mvn site" process (the output
> of which can be seen at http://people.apache.org/~mprudhom/openjpa/
> site/
On Aug 21, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Personally, I'm not familiar with cwiki so I don't understand its
advantages or modus operandi. Maybe someone in the group with more
experience using these tools can comment.
Just to give you some idea, I updated the page you added:
h
Bryan-
- If the only thing stopping this stuff from getting to a wiki is
bandwidth of the current dev team, can someone point me in the
right direction so I can run with it?
I think that if Marc is willing to turn over his work in progress
to you then you can run with it. Just see if what
On Aug 21, 2006, at 6:53 AM, Bryan Noll wrote:
Craig...
You seem to be one of the resident experts on infra-related stuff.
Can you comment on some of my questions in the mail?
Thanks...
Bryan Noll wrote:
So... I realize that OpenJPA is super-new to Apache, and this is
for sure the reas
Craig...
You seem to be one of the resident experts on infra-related stuff. Can
you comment on some of my questions in the mail?
Thanks...
Bryan Noll wrote:
So... I realize that OpenJPA is super-new to Apache, and this is for
sure the reason that the documentation is currently located at wh
The breaking up of the docs into separate files can be re-done fairly
easily (and perhaps in a cleaner way: we can have one file per
section, or something), so I don't think that is a showstopper.
As for formatting, is it the output formatting that looks wrong, or
something with the inter
- Is there a plan to migrate this stuff do a different location?
(either http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/openjpa/ or http://
cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/openjpa/Index)
- Is cwiki.apache.org preferred to wiki.apache.org?
- There are certain resources that have bad links to non-existen
13 matches
Mail list logo
