Le 15/09/2011 19:02, Cuong Hoang Bui a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> OpenERP Medical project is now migrated to Tryton :( It's really
> regretful. I think the main reason is related to license recently.
AFAIK, the decision to migrate from openerp to tryton was made by
medical project before any discusi
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Stefan Rijnhart wrote:
> On 15-09-11 19:02, Cuong Hoang Bui wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> OpenERP Medical project is now migrated to Tryton :( It's really
>> regretful. I think the main reason is related to license recently.
>>
>>
> Hi,
>
> the reasons cited for Medic
On 15-09-11 19:02, Cuong Hoang Bui wrote:
Hi All,
OpenERP Medical project is now migrated to Tryton :( It's really
regretful. I think the main reason is related to license recently.
Hi,
the reasons cited for Medical supporting Tryton were:
1 support multiple frameworks for better continui
Hi All,
OpenERP Medical project is now migrated to Tryton :( It's really
regretful. I think the main reason is related to license recently.
So far there's no information or conclusion about this issue.
Fabien, could you please tell something about the future of OpenERP.
--
***
regards,
Phong.
>
>From: Albert Cervera i Areny
>To: openerp-community@lists.launchpad.net
>Cc: Fabien Pinckaers
>Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2011 4:31 PM
>Subject: Re: [Openerp-community] Towards a contributor agreement for OpenERP
>
>
>A Divendres, 29 de
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:31 AM, Albert Cervera i Areny
wrote:
> **
>
> A Divendres, 29 de juliol de 2011 17:38:53, Fabien Pinckaers va escriure:
>
> > Albert,
>
> >
>
> > I was not talking about nan in my email. I have a lot of respect for nan
>
> > which is a very good company and that share a go
A Divendres, 29 de juliol de 2011 17:38:53, Fabien Pinckaers va escriure:
> Albert,
>
> I was not talking about nan in my email. I have a lot of respect for nan
> which is a very good company and that share a good open source vision.
>
> > So, guys, don't be confused by what's being said; some ac
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Fabien Pinckaers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I even have a very personal question:
> >
> > did you guys at OpenERP SA anticipated those 2 issues:
> > 1) incompatibility between AGPL modules and private modules?
>
> No, we missed that point. When we understood we missed
Hello,
> I even have a very personal question:
>
> did you guys at OpenERP SA anticipated those 2 issues:
> 1) incompatibility between AGPL modules and private modules?
No, we missed that point. When we understood we missed that point, we
updated the FAQ within 2 days.
> 2) how private module p
Fabien,
sorry, to comment again:
> Yes, may be I should explain this mistake of mine.
>
> When I announced this, we found a solution that:
> - is compatible with AGPL
>
Sorry, but I think you are playing on words here: private modules are not
compatibles with many strict AGPL modules we have i
Albert,
I was not talking about nan in my email. I have a lot of respect for nan
which is a very good company and that share a good open source vision.
> So, guys, don't be confused by what's being said; some activists are
> motivated by something else than creating a strong product and communit
Hello community,
I'm unfortunately very busy right now, so here at Akretion we need to
discuss internally about that and give our position and suggestions.
Already I can tell that I'm very happy to see Fabien making such a proposal
to add some extra SaaS protective clause in license exception. Ind
+1 for a contributor agreement for OpenERP Foundation.
--
Maxime Chambreuil
- Mail original -
Hi Fabien,
thank you again for your effort to display your commitment to free and
There is already such a section in the FLA to this purpose [1], which states
KDE e.V. shall only exercis
Hi Fabien,
thank you again for your effort to display your commitment to free and
open source software, especially in the following line:
we can put a clause on the contributor agreement: if one day, something
developed by openerp is not open source (under one of the gnu licenses) the
copyr
Hello Fabien,
Well, now that you have personally mentioned my name, I am required to clarify
our (me and Openlabs) stand on your remarks.
On Jul 28, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Fabien Pinckaers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It's a pity that some lost their trust on OpenERP, especially because these
> fears and d
A Dijous, 28 de juliol de 2011 19:12:29, Fabien Pinckaers va escriure:
> It's a pity that some lost their trust on OpenERP, especially because these
> fears and doubts have been highly motivated by tryton guys that tried to
> create frustrations, unfair critics and war against OpenERP. We used to
>
Leonardo,
> - on one side, some people, especially tryton supporters, are
> behaving in a way I don't agree with. We all make our choices,
> any of us is free work on OpenERP, Tryton, SAP, OpenBravo, a
> bakery shop or whatever, but that doesn't entitle us to tweet
> #openerp #fail and similar FUD
Fabien,
I think there are two sides on this discussion:
- on one side, some people, especially tryton supporters, are behaving in a way
I don't agree with. We all make our choices, any of us is free work on OpenERP,
Tryton, SAP, OpenBravo, a bakery shop or whatever, but that doesn't entitle us
Hello,
It's a pity that some lost their trust on OpenERP, especially because these
fears and doubts have been highly motivated by tryton guys that tried to create
frustrations, unfair critics and war against OpenERP. We used to never answer
to these unfair attacks as creating a war and motivate
Il 28/07/2011 01:59, Ana Juaristi ha scritto:
It's really a pity that Nan is moving to Triton and several others are
thinking about it. I think OpenERP doesn't know the value is loosing if
they let Nan go. It's my opinion.
Exactly, i don't care about the stupid war between tryton and openerp,
Raphaël named the enterprises in Spain that built spanish localization
modules. They were Nan, Zikzakmedia, Pexego and so many people not only
partners but also community people who contributed and they are still
contributing. Thanks to them it's possible today installing and implementing
OpenERP i
A Dimecres, 27 de juliol de 2011 17:58:04, Raphael Valyi va escriure:
> Okay, believe me the situation is just as annoying for us too. So I hope
> you will start providing enough contractual guarantees about the SaaS and
> may be make the exception only an additional option that is not something
>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Fabien Pinckaers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We just follow the recommandation of the Free Software Foundation:
> - http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AssignCopyright
>
> Most of the good open source software publishers does this. As an
> example, here is the one
Dear Stefan, thank you bringing up this topic. Thank you Fabian for
answering the questions raised.
The main question for me is still not asked and answered. Despite all
communication done already from the start of the announcement in this
dual license issue. To start with a side issue, where
IMHO add in changelog file for each component the name of contributors is
ok, i see that in many open source projects.
Regards,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Fabien Pinckaers wrote:
> Hello Stefan,
>
> Thank you for your feedback.
>
> > thank you for your passionate reaction. I believe that
Hello Stefan,
Thank you for your feedback.
> thank you for your passionate reaction. I believe that you share the same
> passion for Open Source software and the OpenERP products in particular as we
> do.
Yes, and I take this opportunity to also thank you for the great contrib you
did too.
On 26-07-11 09:31, Alan Lord (Gmail) wrote:
Might be an idea to take a look at the output of Project Harmony[1]
for contributor agreements.
These are community (inc. Canonical) developed agreements with a
number of options to suit most requirements:
[1] http://harmonyagreements.org/
Al
Hi
Hi Fabien,
thank you for your passionate reaction. I believe that you share the
same passion for Open Source software and the OpenERP products in
particular as we do. We agree with you that OpenERP SA is 'not just a
commercial entity' and it has been doing a wonderful job building great
open
Might be an idea to take a look at the output of Project Harmony[1] for
contributor agreements.
These are community (inc. Canonical) developed agreements with a number
of options to suit most requirements:
[1] http://harmonyagreements.org/
Al
On 26/07/11 02:12, Fabien Pinckaers wrote:
Hell
Hello,
We just follow the recommandation of the Free Software Foundation:
- http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AssignCopyright
Most of the good open source software publishers does this. As an
example, here is the one of Canonical (Ubuntu):
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical%27s_c
Hi,
In the forum topic on dual license community modules [1] we, like others
before us pointed out that OpenERP SA was not entitled to relicense code
from outside contributors. We were contacted afterwards by Olivier Dony
who asked us whether we would be willing to assign copyright of our
con
31 matches
Mail list logo
