Hi All,
Minutes from this weeks IRC meeting can be found here:
Meeting ended Tue Mar 17 16:23:45 2015 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2015/hyper_v.2015-03-17-16.01.html
Minutes (text):
Hi Everyone,
Here are the meeting minutes from today's meeting.
Meeting ended Tue May 27 16:13:45 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-05-27-16.01.html
Minutes (text):
Is there a plan to get Hyper-V CI working better? It looks like it is
failing significantly more frequently then Jenkins.
http://www.rcbops.com/gerrit/reports/nova-cireport.html
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Peter Pouliot wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
> Here are the minutes from today’s Hyper-V Mee
Hi Everyone,
Here are the minutes from today’s Hyper-V Meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-04-15-16.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-04-15-16.02.txt
Log:
http://eavesdrop.o
Hi everyone,
Here is the log from today's Hyper-v Meeting.
Meeting ended Tue Feb 18 16:17:57 2014 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-02-18-16.00.html
Minutes (text):
htt
Hi All,
Here are the minutes from today's meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-10-22-16.01.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-10-22-16.01.txt
Log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.or
On 10/16/2013 06:59 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
>> On Oct 16, 2013, at 13:19 , Thierry Carrez >> The other two alternatives are to accept the delays and work within Nova
>>> (slowly building the trust that will give you more autonomy), or ship it
>>> as a separate add-on t
On 10/16/2013 08:59 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
When somebody (especially a core reviewer) puts a -1 and a new patch is
committed to address it,
I noticed that other reviewers wait for the guy that put the -1 to say
something before +1/+2 it.
My feeling on this is that if somebody reviews a
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:51:50AM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
> > +1 - I think we really want to have a strong preference for a stable
> > api if we start separating parts out
>
> So, as someone who is about to break the driver API all to hell over the
> next six months (er, I mean, make some signif
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
> > +1 - I think we really want to have a strong preference for a stable
> > api if we start separating parts out
>
> So, as someone who is about to break the driver API all to hell over the
> next six months (er, I mean, make some significant ch
> +1 - I think we really want to have a strong preference for a stable
> api if we start separating parts out
So, as someone who is about to break the driver API all to hell over the
next six months (er, I mean, make some significant changes), I can tell
you that making it stable is the best way
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:59:26PM +, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
>
> When somebody (especially a core reviewer) puts a -1 and a new patch is
> committed to address it,
> I noticed that other reviewers wait for the guy that put the -1 to say
> something before +1/+2 it.
I think that depends
On Oct 16, 2013, at 15:16 , Sean Dague
wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 01:19 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
>
>>
>> Sean, you got "called out" in the meeting not because you asked to put a
>> refernce link to the specs which was perfectly reasonable, but because
>> after we did what you asked for in a
On 10/16/2013 01:45 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Hi Sean,
I'm going to top post because my response is general. I totally agree that we
need people that understand the code base and we should encourage new people to
be cross-functional. I guess my main issue is with how we get there. I believ
On 10/16/2013 01:19 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
Sean, you got "called out" in the meeting not because you asked to put a
refernce link to the specs which was perfectly reasonable, but because
after we did what you asked for in a timely manner, you didn't bother to
review the patch again until
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Sean Dague wrote:
> > The Linux kernel process works for a couple of reasons...
> >
> > 1) the subsystem maintainers have known each other for a solid decade
> > (i.e. 3x the lifespan of the OpenStack project), over a history of 10
> > years
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 16 October 2013 20:14, Alessandro Pilotti
> wrote:>
> >
>
> > Drivers are IMO not part of the core of Nova, but completely separated
> and decoupled entities, which IMO should be treated that way. As a
> consequence, we frankly don't str
Sorry guys about this, my OS X Mail client had no issues
in doing the proper indentation, so I never noticed it. Darn.
I made a test with Daniel with a private email before spamming
here for nothing. Hope it worked out here as well.
Thanks for the heads up.
On Oct 16, 2013, at 13:47 , "Daniel
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Alessandro, please fix your email program so that it does not send
> HTML email to the list, and correctly quotes text you are replying
> to with '> '.
+1 :)
Reference:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MailingListEtiquette
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2013, at 13:19 , Thierry Carrez > The other two alternatives are to accept the delays and work within Nova
>> (slowly building the trust that will give you more autonomy), or ship it
>> as a separate add-on that does not come with nova-core's signature on it.
Alessandro, please fix your email program so that it does not send
HTML email to the list, and correctly quotes text you are replying
to with '> '. Your reply comes out looking like this which makes it
impossible to see who wrote what:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:42:45AM +, Alessandro Pilotti w
On Oct 16, 2013, at 13:19 , Thierry Carrez
mailto:thie...@openstack.org>>
wrote:
Sean Dague wrote:
The Linux kernel process works for a couple of reasons...
1) the subsystem maintainers have known each other for a solid decade
(i.e. 3x the lifespan of the OpenStack project), over a history of
Sean Dague wrote:
> The Linux kernel process works for a couple of reasons...
>
> 1) the subsystem maintainers have known each other for a solid decade
> (i.e. 3x the lifespan of the OpenStack project), over a history of 10
> years, of people doing the right things, you build trust in their judgme
On Oct 16, 2013, at 11:19 , Robert Collins
mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net>>
wrote:
On 16 October 2013 20:14, Alessandro Pilotti
mailto:apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com>>
wrote:>
Drivers are IMO not part of the core of Nova, but completely separated and
decoupled entities, which IMO should
On 16 October 2013 20:14, Alessandro Pilotti
wrote:>
>
> Drivers are IMO not part of the core of Nova, but completely separated and
> decoupled entities, which IMO should be treated that way. As a consequence,
> we frankly don't stricly feel as part of Nova, although some of us have a
> pretty
On Oct 16, 2013, at 08:45 , Vishvananda Ishaya
wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> I'm going to top post because my response is general. I totally agree that we
> need people that understand the code base and we should encourage new people
> to be cross-functional. I guess my main issue is with how we ge
On Oct 16, 2013, at 05:48 , Dan Smith
mailto:d...@danplanet.com>> wrote:
The last thing that OpenStack needs ANY more help with is velocity. I
mean, let's be serious - we land WAY more patches in a day than is
even close to sane.
Thanks for saying this -- it doesn't get said enough. I find it
Hi Sean,
I'm going to top post because my response is general. I totally agree that we
need people that understand the code base and we should encourage new people to
be cross-functional. I guess my main issue is with how we get there. I believe
in encouragment over punishment. In my mind givin
On Oct 16, 2013, at 02:36 , Sean Dague mailto:s...@dague.net>>
wrote:
On 10/15/2013 04:54 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different sides. This is
a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple further and extend our
> The last thing that OpenStack needs ANY more help with is velocity. I
> mean, let's be serious - we land WAY more patches in a day than is
> even close to sane.
Thanks for saying this -- it doesn't get said enough. I find it totally
amazing that we're merging 34 changes in a day (yesterday) whic
Monty Taylor wrote:
On 10/15/2013 08:36 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 04:54 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I've been following this conversation and weighing the different
>> sides. This is a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple
>> further a
On 10/15/2013 08:36 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 10/15/2013 04:54 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I've been following this conversation and weighing the different
>> sides. This is a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple
>> further and extend our circle of trust.
On 10/15/2013 04:54 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different sides. This is
a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple further and extend our
circle of trust.
When nova started it was very easy to do feature develo
On 2013-10-15 17:02, Robert Collins wrote:
On 16 October 2013 09:54, Vishvananda Ishaya
wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different
sides. This is a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple
further and extend our circle of trust.
When no
On 16 October 2013 09:54, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I've been following this conversation and weighing the different sides. This
> is a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple further and extend
> our circle of trust.
>
> When nova started it was very easy to do f
From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com]
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different sides. This is
a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple further and extend our
circle of trust.
When nova started it was very easy to do
Hi Everyone,
I've been following this conversation and weighing the different sides. This is
a tricky issue but I think it is important to decouple further and extend our
circle of trust.
When nova started it was very easy to do feature development. As it has matured
the pace has slowed. This
On 10/15/2013 12:52 PM, Peter Pouliot wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
> Here are the minutes from today’s hyper-v meeting.
>
>
>
> Minutes:
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-10-15-16.03.html
>
> Minutes (text):
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hype
Hi Everyone,
Here are the minutes from today's hyper-v meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-10-15-16.03.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-10-15-16.03.txt
Log:
http://eavesdrop.
Hi everyone,
Today’s Hyper-V meeting minutes.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-10-16.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-10-16.02.txt
Log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meet
Hi everyone,
Here are the minutes from today's Hyper-V meeting.
Meeting ended Tue Sep 3 17:01:15 2013 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-03-16.01.html
Minutes (text)
Thank you. I appreciate you handling it.
P
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
Original message
From: Alessandro Pilotti
Date: 08/27/2013 12:40 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] Hyper-V Meeting minutes
Today&#
Today's Hyper-V meeting minutes:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-08-27-16.06.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-08-27-16.06.txt
Log:
http://ea
Today's Hyper-V meeting minutes:
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-08-20-16.06.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-08-20-16.06.txt
Log:
http://ea
Hi Everyone,
Here are the minutes from today's Hyper-V meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/_hyper_v/2013/_hyper_v.2013-08-13-16.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/_hyper_v/2013/_hyper_v.2013-08-13-16.02.txt
Log:
http://eavesd
Hi Everyone,
Here are the minutes from today's meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-30-16.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-30-16.02.txt
Log:
http://eavesdrop.openstac
Hi All,
Here's the minutes for today's meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-09-16.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-09-16.00.txt
Log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/me
Meeting ended Tue Jun 25 16:18:14 2013 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-06-25-16.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.20
48 matches
Mail list logo
