Hi Ihar,
Thank you for starting this thread. Here is what on top of my mind for Mitaka:
I will be busy with work centered around networking-sfc project.
Networking-sfc is a sub project of Neutron (part of the Neutron Stadium),
which provides a service function chain API and related functionalit
Thanks Ihar. Here is what I plan to work on, or hope to help out with:
Continue working on alembic to support online migrations.
The alembic migrations seem to be a mysterious thing to many developers. I plan
to improve the devref documentation around this. The --autogenerate of
revisions, in par
Hello All,
Probably quite late answering this email but I want to add our contributions.
We will be testing Neutron at scale, so we will be contributing to bugs opened
based on the outcome of our tests. We will be also testing concurrency, we are
leveraging rally for this goal and also expectin
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Anna Kamyshnikova <
akamyshnik...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> I can' say that I have any great plans for this cycle, but I would like
> look into L3 HA (L3 HA + DVR) feature,
>
The agent side patch was merged yesterday, and the server side patch needs
reviews: https://r
I can' say that I have any great plans for this cycle, but I would like
look into L3 HA (L3 HA + DVR) feature, probably some bugfixes in this area
and online data migration as logical continuation of online migration
support that was done in Liberty.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka
> On 06 Oct 2015, at 19:10, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> On 10/01/2015 03:45 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I talked recently with several contributors about what each of us plans for
>> the next cycle, and found it’s quite useful to share thoughts with others,
>> because you have im
On 10/01/2015 03:45 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I talked recently with several contributors about what each of us plans for
> the next cycle, and found it’s quite useful to share thoughts with others,
> because you have immediate yay/nay feedback, and maybe find companions for
> ne
On my top of mind for Mitaka:
*Introducing common Classifier Model [1]:*Currently, neutron service/s
(e.g. Service Function Chaining, QoS, Tap as a Service, FWaaS, Security
Group etc) which requires traffic classification defines their own
classifier model. This introduces redundancy. In order to
(Cross-posting to the operators list for feedback)
Thank you Ihar for starting this up. In the absence of any kind of
blog or other outlet of my own to disseminate this, let me share my
plans here...
Routed Networks:
My plans for Mitaka (and beyond) are around routed networks. During
Liberty,
Very nice thread Ihar!
Here are my plans:
1. Get the last patches of the blueprint restructure-l2-agent merged
and keep working on improving the agent. Some code refactor is
definitely needed and I'd like to add multiple workers.
2. Introducing oslo versioned objects
3. Make it easier to get s
Hi,
I have some plans in Mitaka cycle.
1. AZ support[1]
- I proposed AZ support in Liberty but the millstone is Mitaka now. The spec
has been merged in Mitaka.
I keep to propose the patches on Gerrit.
2. LinuxbrideDVR
- I'm trying to create concrete implementation and then I achieve it near
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 8:59 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
>> On 01 Oct 2015, at 17:42, Sean M. Collins wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:05:29AM EDT, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:02:24AM EDT, Ihar Hrachy
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 10:07:32PM +0300, Gal Sagie wrote:
> If you are not familiar with Kuryr you can read my blog post about it here
> [1].
> Basically we already have a working demo integrating with Neutron and we
> are going to show
> it in OpenStack Tokyo (probably in the keynotes and in a sp
Hi Ben,
If you are not familiar with Kuryr you can read my blog post about it here
[1].
Basically we already have a working demo integrating with Neutron and we
are going to show
it in OpenStack Tokyo (probably in the keynotes and in a specific Kuryr
session).
For the OVN part, there are some are
Moshe Levi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean M. Collins [mailto:s...@coreitpro.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 6:42 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] New cycle started. What are you up
to, folks?
On Thu
On 01/10/15 14:47, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I talked recently with several contributors about what each of us plans for
> the next cycle, and found it’s quite useful to share thoughts with others,
> because you have immediate yay/nay feedback, and maybe find companions for
> next adv
On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 08:19:47AM +0300, Gal Sagie wrote:
> *OVN*
>
>1) OVN integration with Kuryr
Can you say anything more about what that entails?
Thanks,
Ben.
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage q
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean M. Collins [mailto:s...@coreitpro.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 6:42 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] New cycle started. What are you up
> t
This is going to be busy cycle for me, but with many exciting and
interesting topics:
*Kuryr*
Kuryr is starting to gain interest from the community and going to be
demoed and presented in OpenStack
Tokyo, i think all this positive feedback means we are on the right track
and we have a very busy
r
(With apologies to the Who)...
"Meet the new things, same as the old things"
DVR - let's make it real folks :)
Performance - I keep turning over rocks and finding things that just don't
make sense to me...
I suspect others will come a calling as we go...
Ryan Moats
On 1 October 2015 at 08:42, Sean M. Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:05:29AM EDT, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Sean M. Collins
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:02:24AM EDT, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > > > - more changes with less infra tinkering!
> On 01 Oct 2015, at 17:42, Sean M. Collins wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:05:29AM EDT, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:02:24AM EDT, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
- more changes with less infra tinkering! neutr
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 11:05:29AM EDT, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:02:24AM EDT, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > > - more changes with less infra tinkering! neutron devs should not need
> > to go to infra projects so oft
> On 01 Oct 2015, at 17:05, Kyle Mestery wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:02:24AM EDT, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > - more changes with less infra tinkering! neutron devs should not need to
> > go to infra projects so often to make an
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:02:24AM EDT, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> > - more changes with less infra tinkering! neutron devs should not need
> to go to infra projects so often to make an impact;
> > -- make our little neat devstack plugin used
On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:02:24AM EDT, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> - more changes with less infra tinkering! neutron devs should not need to go
> to infra projects so often to make an impact;
> -- make our little neat devstack plugin used for qos and sr-iov only a huge
> pile of bash code that is c
On 1 October 2015 at 06:45, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I talked recently with several contributors about what each of us plans
> for the next cycle, and found it’s quite useful to share thoughts with
> others, because you have immediate yay/nay feedback, and maybe find
> companions for
> On 01 Oct 2015, at 15:45, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I talked recently with several contributors about what each of us plans for
> the next cycle, and found it’s quite useful to share thoughts with others,
> because you have immediate yay/nay feedback, and maybe find companions f
28 matches
Mail list logo