I think his photos of flying insects are very good. In fact, almost all
other insect photos I've seen are of critters at rest. I would say this
work is quite an achievement.
Paul
On Aug 20, 2005, at 10:53 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2005, at 09:27 AM, Juan Buhler wrote:
Wh
Nice folder, Frank. Excellent overall. My favorites are portrait of
Ninja and Tofu Through the Warehouses. But there are man fine shots
here.
Paul
On Aug 19, 2005, at 4:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/19/2005 9:12:19 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For
Yesterday was the culmination of more than a month of activity and
great cars on Detroit's Woodward Avenue. The eleventh annual Dream
Cruise played to intermittent showers, which held the cruisers and
crowd down to a reported 40,000 and 1.1 million respectively.
Nevertheless, it was a great tim
Hi Bill,
Considering that you were trying to shoot birds in flight, you seem to
have done a reasonably good job of getting them in focus on that second
shot, although it would be nice if they were a bit closer. There
doesn't seem to be any evidence of camera shake, so your tripod setup
must be
Hi Shel,
Nice. Fun pics, well captured. Love that Leica. Is it an M3? Do we know
the subject?
Paul
On Aug 21, 2005, at 1:05 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I was doing some file maintenance this evening when I rediscovered
these
pics. I don't believe they've been posted here before.
Comments welc
Shoot RAW and set your color temperature and hue during conversion. I
do all my studio work in RAW. It's the only way to get it absolutely
right without a lot of fuss. To make it easy, place a white object
somewhere in the shot, and use the eyedropper to set color temperature.
You can just clon
I'm not familiar with the S, but I use Remote Assistant on a regular
basis with my D. It's great for studio work. I can sit at the computer
and trip the shutter. The review image then appears on my screen, and
the RAW file is saved to the computer. If I need to see exactly what I
got, I just op
Great shot, Bill. I know we've seen it before, but I still love it.
Could you fashion a mount adapter for the tripod mount that would give
better balance? It seems like that might be an easy thing to do.
Paul
On Aug 21, 2005, at 2:56 PM, william sawyer wrote:
Bill,
I've had this lens for abo
Interesting portrait. Nice light.
On Aug 21, 2005, at 2:59 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
This one brings me up to date. :-)
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/33.htm
Comments, critique, flames always appreciated.
enjoy,
Godfrey
I like it in that it has some context. It's not just a moon shot. I
think that I would like to see a bit more of the buildings to either
side, but that may not have been possible in this location.
Paul
On Aug 21, 2005, at 4:24 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I don't know if I'm happy with this or not
*istDS2 sounds like nothing but a minor upgrade, if that. It might even
be a downgrade based on the price. Is there anything new about it other
than the filters? Of course the 12-24 is old news. The only real news
here is the 540 flash. Is that guide number better than the Sigma
Super?
On Aug
True. It is a plus for Pentax in some ways. I'm just mildly
disappointed that this wasn't the upgrade announcement many of us have
been waiting for. Still, I'm doing fine with the D and can continue in
that fashion indefinitely. I am excited about the 12-24. Pricey, as I
expected, but it's a l
Lumiquest makes a nice reflector with holes in it. Some of the light
goes up to the ceiling, some bounces off the reflector. The fill ratio
depends on the height of the ceiling, but it gives a nice effect
everywhere I've tried it.
Paul
On Aug 22, 2005, at 6:33 PM, William Robb wrote:
- O
I can't imagine that anything would obsolete a current DSLR in just ten
years. Memory devices shouldn't be a problem. My card reader has no
moving parts and a firewire connector. (I still have the 10 meg scsi
hard drive that I bought close to twenty years ago, and my computer can
still read it.
Okay, Pentaxian gardeners. I need an ID. I'm finishing up a garden
article for a sunday supplement mag. I have one flower pic I want to
use, but I can't find the little bloom in any of my reference book.
It's tiny, only about a centimeter or so across. I put it up on
PhotoNet. Hope someone here
Thanks Stan. That makes sense. The leaves are spikey like an oriental
lily.
Paul
On Aug 23, 2005, at 11:06 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Some form of lily, possibly a star lily variant...
stan
On Aug 23, 2005, at 7:45 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Okay, Pentaxian gardeners. I need an ID. I&#
I'm game. I've shot a lot of weird things and attempted some rather
difficult shots, but one comes to mind immediately. It was almost 25
years ago, and I was working for Hearst Magazines in New York. We were
running an article about Ford's propane engine cars in Motor Magazine,
and the editor
I'll look for it tonight. I at least have the cover, which I could
scan. But I might have the transparancy as well. All my transparencies
from those days are buried in a box in the basement, but I at least
know where to look :-).
Paul
On Aug 23, 2005, at 11:39 PM, Tom C wrote:
Paul Sten
ilm...
I had to find this out by trial and error
sort like what you did...But once I knew
the correct compensation times it was easy to repeat.
jco
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 11:30 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: R
8x12 and 11x17 precut mats are fairly common these days. I buy them all
the time at the local camera store.
Paul
On Aug 24, 2005, at 1:09 AM, Pat White wrote:
What, doesn't everybody want 8x12 or 13.5x20 enlargements? I used to
pay extra for them (got some on the wall, looking good), but now I
t one.
Bob
On Wednesday, August 24, 2005, at 07:20 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis
wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Stan Halpin wrote:
On Aug 23, 2005, at 7:45 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Okay, Pentaxian gardeners. I need an ID. I'm finishing up a garden
article for a sunday supplement mag. I have
Superb example of BW conversion. (I like the shot very much as well.)
But on my monitor, the highlights and shadows are detailed and right at
the ends of the spectrum, the midtones are nicely separated and
beautifully rendered. Excellent. Would love to see it printed on Epson
Velvet Fine Art Pa
I fully expect to be able to get a ten to twelve megapixel Pentax in 18
months, and I'm sure it will be less than $2500.
Paul
On Aug 24, 2005, at 4:55 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 24/8/05, Kevin Waterson, discombobulated, unleashed:
This one time, at band camp, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll u
I like the combination of orange and chrome. Shot with the DA 16-45 at
29mm, f8, 1/125th.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3672858&size=lg
While there's no way to set the D between stops, it does include half
stops on aps with many lenses. I know that with most, if not all, of my
FA and DA lenses, I get stops at f 6.7, f9.5, f13 and the other half
clicks. And of course you can always use exposure compensation for fine
tuning. I be
That explains why I get half steps of aperture on my D. I have the step
setting set to half stop, because that's what I prefer when auto
bracketing.
On Aug 27, 2005, at 11:29 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
[DS body]
A custom function can be set to switch between .5 and .3 stop steps
for both ap
Thanks Mark. Love that lens.
Paul
On Aug 27, 2005, at 11:56 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like the combination of orange and chrome. Shot with the DA 16-45 at
29mm, f8, 1/125th.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3672858&size=lg
Oh
You need female. It's the receptacle half of the connector. It has a
hole in the middle. The male side of the connector on your flash should
have a pin in the middle.
Paul
On Aug 27, 2005, at 4:12 PM, David Weiss wrote:
Godfrey,
Could you check the Wein ID number? I looked at the B&H
website
Very nice. It really captures the hustle and bustle of chinatown. The
background is nicely swished, yet still clear enough to define the
setting, the main subject is defined yet not so sharp as to look pasted
into the scene. If I asked for one little thing, it would be a tiny bit
more image are
Not a bad pic, although the subject of interest (the bug) is not very
well suited to shooting at this distance. Bokeh is largely dependent on
the shape of the background objects and how distant they are from the
subject. Here, you have some very bright objects that are too close to
form smooth
Photoner uploads must be stripped of EXIF data. "Save for Web" does
this quickly and efficiently while allowing various levels of
compression. For those of us who use Photonet, it's a useful tool.
Paul
On Aug 28, 2005, at 2:44 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 28, 2005, at 2:41 AM, David Man
What Godders said. Excellent shot.
Paul
On Aug 28, 2005, at 3:03 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You have a nice gallery of photos there, all of them. Showing my
druthers, I preferred four of the five B&W renderings over the color
renderings, but for one (the floating leaf). This one, however, is m
In addition to the boat shot, I really love the little girl eating
spaghetti and the color shot of the girl running toward camera across
the cracked landscape. Fascinating shot.
Paul
On Aug 28, 2005, at 2:44 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Finally I realized I have enough images to compile a ga
Nicely executed. The foreground leaves add interest. You're lucky you
made it out alive!
Paul
On Aug 29, 2005, at 1:46 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Took a long hike in the woods and came across this...
http://www.mindspring.com/~webster26/PESO_--_beast.html
Technical Info:
Pentax *ist-D ISO 800 @
Excellent photo. It's a nice composition and frame. And Annsan walking
away with hat on and backpack mounted suggests someone heading off in
search of adventure, which, of course, is an Annsan thing to do. Very
nice.
Paul
On Aug 29, 2005, at 10:52 PM, frank theriault wrote:
I think I may have
Kodak just offered my daughter a position. She's a graphic artist, but
I don't know what the job entails. She'll probably talk to them today.
Paul
On Aug 30, 2005, at 1:33 AM, Gautam Sarup wrote:
is common and is causing them real problems. He said the only way they
can get experienced enginee
What Bill said. That's pretty much where I'm at on both a new D and a
645 digital.
Paul
On Aug 30, 2005, at 10:58 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Herb Chong"
Subject: Re: Ordered the DS this Morning
. i am willing to pay $5K for a better
spec body, but at that
Interesting shot. It looks almost like a pencil illustration. I like it.
Paul
On Aug 29, 2005, at 8:07 PM, Christian wrote:
... for me anyway. Yes, it's a damn bird.
However, the day's shooting was disrupted by nasty clouds that
rendered the water very washed out. I washed it out even more i
Hmmm. Maybe I'll try mine again. I have two dozen of the little
buggers. I've been using them only in my flash lately, with the
lithiums going in the cameras.
Paul
On Aug 31, 2005, at 2:43 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
To Fred and Shel:
Don't be upset if your NiMH rechargeable batteries don't last
I get around 2000 from lithiums, but that''s with eight batteries, four
in the grip and four in the camera.
Paul
On Aug 31, 2005, at 6:46 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
I've been reading most of this thread. People tell they are getting
large
numbers of pictures out of a battery pack. I get a lot less.
Hi Shel,
My D has enough correction for me to leave my reading glasses home --
+2 is the max I think. I think the S is the same. I have it set at
about +1.8. Prior to buying that camera I had forced myself to learn to
focus with my left eye. It's nice to be back to shooting righty.
Paul
On Sep
It looks like neither one is in focus or else you have camera shake.
The lenses can't be that bad. You have to shoot a test like this off a
tripod and focus carefully.
On Sep 3, 2005, at 12:06 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Don ... They both look pretty bad, although the A hoovers more than
th
They look very good to me. I might have pulled down the exposure a wee
bit in the converter (on both) and pushed up the brightness a bit to
bring the mid range back to where it was. That would give you a little
more shadow detail, equivalent mid range tones, and a tad less
highlight. If I lost
I have no problem with the four way switch on the D. I use it for
selective autofocus control on a regular bases and frequently move the
red dot back and forth across the frame.
On Sep 3, 2005, at 11:46 AM, Powell Hargrave wrote:
My Ds controls are perfect.
(hope my camera didn't hear me typ
I agree. A camera is certainly not less noticeable because the logo is
covered with tape. I would guess a big-rep pro who is not getting free
cameras might cover the logo in order not to provide free advertising
for the maker. But an uncelebrated user -- even a highly skilled user
-- is of no r
ious, and his choice of camera covering to be abhorrent?
Long live gaffer tape!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
I agree. A camera is certainly not less noticeable because the logo is
covered with tape. I would guess a big-rep pro who is not getting free
cameras might cover th
Nice shots. Not only are they well executed, but you're capturing
critical moments. Good work.
Paul
On Sep 4, 2005, at 12:36 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Thanks, Boris.
I guess what you mean is, it's a bit unusual to get rather nice
concert
shots with such a slow combo?
Indeed.
Well, I
Take heart. I had to return my first D. It couldn't read the card. I
got a replacement immediately and haven't had any problems since with
either of my D (s).
Paul
On Sep 4, 2005, at 12:36 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The results are in - the camera is defective and it will be returned
to the
se
I like "freakout/" The veal pic makes me hungry for some lightly
sauteed scallopini with capers and lemon. Yum. .
Paul
On Sep 4, 2005, at 6:36 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Well I spent yesterday visiting friends and exploring the Woodstock
Fair. The oldest agriculture fair in the United States. I
My granddaughter is now eleven months old, and she is, of course,
reading. I started her out on the New York Times, because I think it
will be a plus in terms of vocabulary development. I did tell her to
beware the liberal bias. She answered, "You don't have to tell me,
Grandpa." That's my girl
Having spent much time in both California and the upper midwest, I have
to say that the accents are indistinguishable to me. I think this is
due in part to the fact that a large number -- perhaps a majority -- of
southern Californians emigrated from the industrial cities of the
midwest.
On Sep
Thanks Cotty. It's nice to have a toddler around again. I spent much of
yesterday giving chase with the camera.
Paul
On Sep 5, 2005, at 3:57 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 4/9/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
My granddaughter is now eleven months old, and she is, of course,
readi
My only quibble with this test would be that the two snippets are not
equidistant from the lens. What was your focal point?
On Sep 5, 2005, at 5:51 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Shel,
Here's the whole scene, with the two target snips highlighted in red:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/test-tar
It's a nice lens, but it's a little long for an all-purpose zoom. The
DA 16-45 is better suited to that purpose. The two make an excellent
pair.
Paul
On Sep 5, 2005, at 8:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey gang.
Just wondering if anyone has used the Pentax A2XL Tele on Sigma
lenses
visit from the UK?
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/5/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/9/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
My granddaughter is now eleven months old, and she is, of course,
reading. I started her out on the New York Times, because I think it
will be a plus in te
Thanks Frank. When I have a few minutes to spare I'm going to clean up
the background a bit. Gotta get rid of that pole.
On Sep 5, 2005, at 9:20 AM, frank theriault wrote:
On 9/4/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My granddaughter is now eleven months old, and she is
y of
the
lens and the shooting parameters that contribute to the sharpness?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3698379&size=lg
Nice pan, Frank. You captured the moment well. It would look a little
better on my monitor with a bit more brightness in the middle of the
RGB curve.
Paul
On Sep 6, 2005, at 12:41 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
*Caution, yet another bike photo*
How can one protect oneself in such a case ?
I did spend quite a bit of time on the floor with her. It's essential
to getting decent pics of itty-bitty kids.
Paul
On Sep 6, 2005, at 12:47 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
My granddaughter is now eleven months old, and she is, of course,
reading. I started her out on the New York Times, beca
Nice shot. I find the conversion quite good. It shows good range from
the almost white highlights on the shirt to the almost black shadow
areas in the hair. Good shadow detail under his chin and good highlight
detail on the skin. As an infrequent visitor to London, I'll invoke a
distant, vague
If you have a Costco card, you'll find that they sell SanDisk Ultra II
1 gig cards for about $80. That's the CF price. SD might be a bit more.
But you save the shipping cost.
Paul
On Sep 6, 2005, at 7:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/6/2005 1:57:42 PM Pacific Standard Time,
What don't you like about the RAW files? (I may have missed a post on
this.) I shoot nothing but RAW and am quite pleased with the
performance of the D.
Paul
On Sep 6, 2005, at 8:49 PM, R.C.Booth wrote:
I'm certainly not going to gloat. Shel's misfortunes have got to be
very disappointing to
The DA 16-45 and DA 50-200 make a nice companion set of zooms. I
originally bought them just for frivolous shooting but found them so
good that I now use them for serious work as well. At least on those
occasions when I don't want to carry a full set of primes. I think the
upcoming DA 12-24 wil
Burnt out highlights are certainly acceptable in some compositions. For
example, specular highlights on water that are out of the range can be
quite beautiful. In the case of the bride photo, however, I would have
liked to see detail in that part of the dress. I was wondering if this
started ou
Yes, a good read and nice pics. I enjoyed it.
Paul
On Sep 7, 2005, at 6:56 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Cotty,
Always love your essays. Such fun to read and view. Thanks for
sharing!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, September 7, 2005, 2:40:33 PM, you wrote:
C> Not much Pentax content I'm afra
Nice work, Bill. Love the Blue Heron Rookery, Sandhill Crane and
Wildflower. Many good ones here.
Hmmm, dream cruise eh? I haven't processed them all yet, but I'll see
what I can do.
Paul
On Sep 7, 2005, at 8:17 PM, william sawyer wrote:
I keep hoping Paul Stenquist will honor
l details. I'm
disheartened to see what I perceive as an overall decline in the
quality of
photography.
Shel
"Am I paranoid or perceptive?"
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: SV: PESO - The Bridge
Burnt out highlights are certainly acceptable in some compositio
Due to popular demand, I've posted some Dream Cruise pics. Okay, it
wasn't exactly popular demand, but my buddy Bill did request these, so
here they are. Many are just snaps that I shot from my Chevy while
cruising, but most of them are at least a bit entertaining. Some are
from the night befor
taking greater care with
the
photos they present, learning more about what makes a good photo (at
least
technically), and spending more time correcting small details. I'm
disheartened to see what I perceive as an overall decline in the
quality of
photography.
Shel
"Am I paranoid or percept
re.
Also, you have some healthy young women in your neighborhood.
On Sep 7, 2005, at 11:14 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Due to popular demand, I've posted some Dream Cruise pics. Okay, it
wasn't exactly popular demand, but my buddy Bill did request these,
so here they are. Many are ju
It's an area of a photo that shows no detail due to overexposure -- the
whitest of whites.
Paul
On Sep 8, 2005, at 1:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of these days you are going to define it so I understand it?
Exactly what
is a blown highlight?
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Yes, it is a matter of preference. Some photographers find artistic
expression in extreme contrast representations or high-key work. A
blown highlight isn't necessarily a mistake, although there are cases
where a shot would quite obviously be improved if more detail were
represented in a highli
Beautiful girl, beautiful shot. Love the light. Very nice.
Paul
On Sep 8, 2005, at 1:39 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
This is my daughter. It was taken as the light was waning in the
evening. I had to use a fairly slow shutter speed and large aperture
to
get a reasonable exposure. She had just got
I don't think anyone would dispute that the absence of detail in that
shot is somewhat undesirable. But as Bruce said, these are basically
proof conversions. I'd like to see him go back to the RAW, crank the
brightness all the way up to 150, then turn the exposure down until the
midtones are ju
Your example shows good control of highlights. Some are quite bright
but are appropriate for this type of shot in my judgment. Of course,
it's all very subjective.
Paul
On Sep 8, 2005, at 1:57 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My example:
For instance, bride in white. Posed by the wedding photogra
I prefer the original. On my monitor, the bright area on her forehead
is beginning to show a hint of posterization on the higher contrast
version.
On Sep 8, 2005, at 2:45 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Shel,
Based on your recommendation, I went back and punched it up just a
bit. I think it do
This example is far too bright on my screen, and the contrast has
rendered her complexion almost ruddy. The highlights on her forehead
and in her hair are near white.. My display is a calibrated Apple flat
panel with the brightness set rather low to match my printer output.
Paul
On Sep 8, 2005,
te:
'bout time, Paul. And, as expected, outstanding work - no
disappointments
here. I especially like the panning technique - it's very effective.
Um, I hate to bring it up, but your check still isn't here.
Bill Sawyer
Livonia, MI
-Original Message-
From: Paul
hniques in Photoshop: the workflow below and his comment about
turning up the brightness and then adjusting the exposure in another
email just allowed me to rescue a shot I would otherwise have
discarded.
Paul, you da man!
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message ----- From: "Paul
The idea behind using the RAW converter's brightness slider to bring up
the midrange is that it doesn't affect the highlights. On the other
hand, the exposure slider will bring down the highlights."Brightness"
and "contrast" in the RAW converter are not the same as the tools with
the same n
Does that mean the S loses its setting if you don't use it for 48
hours? Or only if the main batteries are removed for 48 hours?
On Sep 10, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Odd, as it's noted the camera comes with the battery on the Pentax
site as
well as elsewhere oh well, one le
I finally had a chance to see this. (Everyone deleted the url. I wish
people would leave at least the location reference when they comment.)
In any case, I like it very much. Nice balance of highlight and shadow.
An interesting, well executed lighting study. Good work.
Paul
On Sep 10, 2005, at
We celebrated my grand daughter's first birthday today. My wife was
going to feed her a piece of cake with a spoon, but Grace beat her to
it. She picked it up and got right to it. That's my girl.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3717131&size=lg
DA 16-45/4 with the Sigma 500Super and
l manner, or is everything on CD or DVD and the computer?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3717131&size=lg
I like this. The light is very subdued and somewhat flat, that's why
the color isn't vibrant. But I prefer this kind of subtlety to direct
sun and hard shadow. As far as the background is concerned, it's what
was there at this magic moment. Nice shot.
Paul
On Sep 10, 2005, at 8:34 PM, [EMAIL
That's why I buy from B&H. With some of these guys, you never know if
they'll be around next week. The New York camera biz is full of seedy
characters.
Paul
On Sep 10, 2005, at 11:53 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Check 'em out. You may be surprised at what you see ;-))
http://www.donwiss.com/pic
I've been selling six or seven images a year with around 240 posted on
a royalty free stock house site. All images on the site sell for around
$270, so I make about $130 on each sale. I've heard that you need a
base of several thousand to develop steady returns. And of course some
sites sell b
Nicely composed. Beautiful, vibrant color.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2005, at 11:25 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Here's an oldie, from a few years ago. Today being an anniversary,
and my
mood being such as it is, I decided to post this again. Large file.
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/seibel.html
Sh
Sunday, September 11, 2005, at 11:36 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I've been selling six or seven images a year with around 240 posted
on a royalty free stock house site. All images on the site sell for
around $270, so I make about $130 on each sale. I've heard that you
need a base of
I really enjoyed these. My father, who was born and raised in Sweden,
painted the Aurora several times. I've never seen it in person, but
these shots remind me of dad's oils. Thanks for sharing.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2005, at 12:22 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I like the second one the best. How far nort
Thanks Bruce.
On Sep 11, 2005, at 12:24 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Paul,
The lighting worked out very well to capture this cute moment. This
will be a pic that others, including her, will want to see well into
the future. Very nicely done.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, September 10,
Thanks Boris. Toddlers are a lot of fun.
On Sep 11, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
We celebrated my grand daughter's first birthday today. My wife was
going to feed her a piece of cake with a spoon, but Grace beat her to
it. She picked it up and got right to it. That's my girl.
Nice composition. Interesting geometry. I like it.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2005, at 2:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/11/2005 10:09:33 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=216097
No manipulation except regular RAW
I like them both. I think the reactions are a little more animated and
interesting on the first. As you noted the frame is better on the
second. Tough choice, but both are quite nice.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2005, at 2:28 PM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Never posted a PAW before. This is actually two
I agree. The first one is the best, but both are keepers. You have a
beautiful daughter.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2005, at 3:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/11/2005 12:16:59 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These two shots were of her own posing, more or less. Al
No reason given? Perhaps just too much work?
On Sep 11, 2005, at 3:47 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:30:25AM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles..
You won't be seeing anything from him on the dpreview site, either ..
The only thing resembling calibration that i've performed with my
monitor is to run the Apple System Preferences display calibration. I
convert all my digital images to Generic RGB and print on an Epson 2200
using Epson paper profiles and Apple Colorsynch. My prints are an exact
match of my mon
Thanks Lasse. Great find.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2005, at 7:26 PM, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Hi all,
I've been spending a couple of hours browsing and watching some very
good photography at the site below.
I thought someone else might enjoy it too, in case you don't already
know about it.
Nice layou
8:14 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 11, 2005, at 4:32 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The only thing resembling calibration that i've performed with my
monitor is to run the Apple System Preferences display calibration. I
convert all my digital images to Generic RGB and print on an Epson
2200 u
Nice work. Love the canyon shots. Beautiful.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2005, at 9:16 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 11, 2005, at 5:37 PM, Herb Chong wrote:
back from vacation and a random grab-bag of photos in chronological
order. all taken within a couple of hours' drive of Calgary.
http://users
1 - 100 of 23489 matches
Mail list logo
