[HACKERS] Are these supported??

2016-08-17 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Hi all, been awhile! Some may be saying "not long enough" but eh. I recently moved a mybb forum away from mysql to postgres. Along the way I encountered a couple of things that either didn't seem to be supported or I'm just not doing it right. First, the server this is on is running versio

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts

2002-04-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
nt and missed a value in the middle somewhere which shifted everything by one. It was agreed that it shouldn't happen but I don't recall what else was decided. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PRO

Re: [HACKERS] Vote on SET in aborted transaction

2002-04-24 Thread Vince Vielhaber
> > > >Please vote and I will tally the results. > > > > > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > Vince. -- =

Re: [HACKERS] Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

2002-04-25 Thread Vince Vielhaber
one I checked accepted it, but that wasn't a good enough reason for us to support it. Until the fact that applications that were using that syntax was causing PostgreSQL not to be used was the issue resolved. Now I'm seeing the "but that's the way Oracle does it" excuse be

Re: [HACKERS] Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction

2002-04-25 Thread Vince Vielhaber
I seem to recall someone even volunteering to write it for us. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking

Re: [HACKERS] Majordomo aliases

2002-06-11 Thread Vince Vielhaber
t and do aset nomail Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directoryhttp://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore

Re: [HACKERS] Majordomo aliases

2002-06-11 Thread Vince Vielhaber
t" is most likely the command you need.) > > A low-tech solution would be to subscribe all your addresses and then > set all but one to "nomail". Not sure if there's a better way. The better way *was* loophole, but it's gone. Vince. -- ========

Re: [HACKERS] Our archive searching stinks

2002-06-24 Thread Vince Vielhaber
nk, but I'm hesitant to link to something that disappears. If it's going to be here and not go away again I'll be happy to add it. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres idea list

2002-06-26 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ppl subscribed to it ... all done. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres idea list

2002-06-26 Thread Vince Vielhaber
I just yell at Marc if something's broke. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directoryhttp://www.camping-usa.com Online

Re: [HACKERS] I am being interviewed by OReilly

2002-07-11 Thread Vince Vielhaber
For the record, the voice on the MP3 isn't Bruce. It's the voice of a professional broadcaster. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide D

Re: [HACKERS] I am being interviewed by OReilly

2002-07-11 Thread Vince Vielhaber
u later today. Then after I made it available someone else did the MP3 conversion and I put that there as well. He caught on pretty quick! :) > > Jeff. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vince Vielhaber > Sent:

Re: [HACKERS] pgbash-2.4a.2 released

2002-07-22 Thread Vince Vielhaber
one from the top. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking Online Campground Directoryhttp://www

Re: [HACKERS] Virus Emails

2002-07-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
from the intended person? Does the filter check only the envelope from > and not the From: line? Don't filter, scan for viruses. McAfee finds it just fine. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PR

Re: [HACKERS] Virus Emails

2002-07-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
st to do ... how do you find the vscan > stuff? do you find it slows down email noticeably? pop4 doesn't even break a sweat and a ton of mail goes thru there every day. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail

Re: [HACKERS] Virus Emails

2002-07-31 Thread Vince Vielhaber
gh to the mailing list cleanly > > > > > > > -- > > > Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler > > > Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, T

Re: [HACKERS] cvs checkout pgsql

2002-08-01 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Ok, ok.. It does *NOW*. :) There's probably still stuff that's broke that I haven't discovered yet. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at

Re: [HACKERS] cvs checkout pgsql

2002-08-01 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 1 Aug 2002, Rod Taylor wrote: > On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 15:33, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > ... is once more 'normal' .

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-14 Thread Vince Vielhaber
;s a different user than "lowen" and we can already restrict a user to one database, can't we? Hmmm. Just checked and I guess not - I thought we had a record type of "user". Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-14 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Wednesday 14 August 2002 03:29 pm, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > Hate to complicate things more, but back to a global username, say > > you have user "lowen" that should have access to all databases. What > > happens if

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-14 Thread Vince Vielhaber
al' users is polluting the namespace too > much, and having none seems to be unappealing. This is why I am back to > just the install user. I wouldn't be in favor of that. Vince. -- == Vince Viel

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ntire issue is growing more and more complex. How about a configure item to not even compile it in? Or better yet, a configure item to put it there with the default off. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail

[HACKERS] failure notice (fwd)

2002-08-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Who the hell are these people and why can't they configure their own MTA? Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
n. When you included it a little while ago I wondered what you were referring to so I read the whole thing more carefully and realized that I missed the end. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, no one complained/commented on my idea of having global users have a > > > trailing '@', so here is a patch t

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
#x27;m willing to live with that. Going from postgres to postgres@ ??? I don't care how simple the patch is, I'd rather it was configurable to keep it out completely. That's not just ugly, that's coyote ugly! Vince. -- =========

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Going from postgres to postgres@ ??? I don't care how simple the patch > > is, I'd rather it was configurable to keep it out completely. That's > > not just ugly, th

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > But it doesn't need to affect anyone, even if it's enabled. Isn't > > the lack of an @ just as good as an @ at the end of the username? > > No, because there isn

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
;-) Here we go again. I thought you just said that the @ wouldn't be something a user would have to do. I understood that to be any user. It's back to ugly again. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-16 Thread Vince Vielhaber
vote for putting it in contrib and letting whoever wants it apply it and use it. The more we discuss it the worse it looks. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K N

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-16 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So are you calling for a vote or just willing to ask for one? I vote for > > putting it in contrib and letting whoever wants it apply it and use it. > > The trouble with putting

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-16 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Lee Kindness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Vince Vielhaber writes: > >>> [ 'user@' patch ] > >>> whim. Then again as long as 7.2.1 is stable enough for me there's > >>> no reason to upgra

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-16 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 10:21:12AM -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > RPMs aren't a good enough reason to put it in. All features aren't > > installed in an RPM, why would this need to? Besides, anything that > &g

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-18 Thread Vince Vielhaber
d global users not having the @ you shot it down as not possible? Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking

Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items

2002-08-18 Thread Vince Vielhaber
is exactly the wrong way to go. Unsophisticated users is hardly a reason. After all they do have an @ in their email address. If they're told the username is foo@ then their username is foo@. What's so difficult about that? Vince. -- ===

[HACKERS] @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in PostgreSQL(fwd)

2002-08-19 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Surprised it took this long. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking http://www.camping-usa.com

Re: [HACKERS] @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in

2002-08-19 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ode is bogus anyway. > > The overflow at INT_MIN will clobber the stack, yes, but in an absolutely > > predetermined way; an attacker will have no opportunity to insert code > > of his choosing. > > > > regards, tom lane > > Vince. -- =

Re: [HACKERS] @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in

2002-08-20 Thread Vince Vielhaber
rap and just return an error before it goes into the weeds and put the subdividing opaque fix in later? Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking

Re: [HACKERS] @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in

2002-08-20 Thread Vince Vielhaber
g before now - it seems I was told this back in 6.3.something. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking

[HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in PostgreSQL(fwd)

2002-08-20 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Here's yet another. He claims malicious code can be run on the server with this one. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.

Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in

2002-08-20 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Here's yet another. He claims malicious code can be run on the server > > with this one. > > regression=# select repeat('xxx',1431655765); > server closed the

[HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0004: Multiple buffer overflows inPostgreSQL. (fwd)

2002-08-20 Thread Vince Vielhaber
And another one. Sure would be nice if shit-for-brains would mention it to us first. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo

Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in

2002-08-20 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 20 Aug 2002, Neil Conway wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Here's yet another. > > Should someone from the core team perhaps get in contact with this guy > and ask if he could get in contact with the development team before > public

Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0004: Multiple buffer

2002-08-20 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 20 Aug 2002, Neil Conway wrote: > Vince Vielhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > And another one. > > This patch should fix the problem. Doesn't include my previous patch > for repeat(). Again, somewhat off-the-cuff, so I might have missed > something.

Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed

2002-08-21 Thread Vince Vielhaber
> > > used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches > > > (ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ... > > > > > > let me know if there are any problems ... > > > > > > > > > ---

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 7.2.2 and docs

2002-08-26 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > Also I notice an announce for release 7.2.3 > appeaing on http://www.postgresql.org. You do? Where? Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail:

Re: [HACKERS] tell Bugtraq about 7.2.2

2002-08-28 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ubscription requirement. > Lamar posted the info about 7.2.2 on bugtraq. I saw it. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4

Re: [HACKERS] DNS change for candle.pha.pa.us

2002-09-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
7; to this fixed IP address. It may take a few days for > the IP to completely propogate. Looks like someone already got it. I just got back into town and am catching up. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [

Re: [ODBC] [HACKERS] ODBC Driver moved to GBorg ...

2002-09-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ated a project on GBorg for the > > > ODBC driver, and I've just finished moving it over and removing it from > > > the main tree ... > > > > > > 2 down ... so many more to go :) > > > > > > > > > ---(end of broadcast)-

Re: [ODBC] [HACKERS] ODBC Driver moved to GBorg ...

2002-09-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
> > > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > > > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > > > > > > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > TIP 3: if posting/reading

Re: [HACKERS] DNS change for candle.pha.pa.us

2002-09-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > I have moved my main computer to my new house. The DNS is still being > > > updated, but the new IP address is: > > > > >

Re: [HACKERS] Just testing tighgter UCE controls ...

2002-09-03 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > ignore if you see this ... What if we don't see it? Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nation

Re: [HACKERS] GBorg is down

2002-09-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
o. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.co

Re: [HACKERS] beta1 packaged

2002-09-05 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > %ls -lt ~ftp/pub/source/v7.3beta Is this where you're putting it this time? Last time was ~ftp/pub/beta. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL P

Re: [HACKERS] Map of developers

2002-09-05 Thread Vince Vielhaber
s I get this tcl tool working. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking http://www.camp

Re: [HACKERS] Map of developers

2002-09-05 Thread Vince Vielhaber
l lists at once with the unregister command > > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > > > Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net

Re: [HACKERS] beta1 packaged

2002-09-05 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Sep 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > > %ls -lt ~ftp/pub/source/v7.3beta > > > > Is this where you're putting it this time? Last time was ~ftp

Re: [HACKERS] Map of developers

2002-09-05 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > I will work on that this month. It is part of the advocacy project. > > > > Since when? > > Since I decide to take ov

Re: [HACKERS] Map of developers

2002-09-05 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [HACKERS] 7.3 beta announcement

2002-09-05 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I haven't see the beta announcement on the announce list. Do we > announce it there? I've been expecting it but haven't seen it yet. Vince. -- ====== Vinc

Re: [HACKERS] Map of developers

2002-09-09 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ro success in getting that tcl tool to work which is the current holdup but I do have all the updates I know of that are needed. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net

Re: Beta2 on Friday Morning (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items)

2002-09-19 Thread Vince Vielhaber
, then let's go with a Sunday night packaging, Monday announce, so that > we have beta2 testing starting right at the beginning of the week ... > > > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (s

Re: [HACKERS] Web site

2002-09-24 Thread Vince Vielhaber
en there, done that, didn't work. Too much of a job to keep track of that many IP blocks too. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup f

Re: [HACKERS] Web site

2002-09-24 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:59:33AM -0400, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Gavin Sherry wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > It occurs to me that opening web page on www.postgresql.org, aski

Re: [HACKERS] Release of 7.2.3

2002-10-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
r site and think they're 100% accurate. Nothing is final until it's announced on the announce mailing list and/or the main website. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.p

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New PostgreSQL Website : advocacy.postgresql.org

2002-10-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
ivities in Congress (re. internet broadcasting), so I want to get the new one up asap and before things bust loose again. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 5

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New PostgreSQL Website : advocacy.postgresql.org

2002-10-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Justin Clift wrote: > > > > > Hi Oleg, > > > > > > It's supposed to show roughly where everyone is. > > > > > >

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] New PostgreSQL Website : advocacy.postgresql.org

2002-10-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Oleg Bartunov wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Justin Clift wrote: >

[HACKERS] reminder for those working on docs

2002-10-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
above url will show the notes and what they're in relation to with a link to that particular piece of documentation. Vince. -- == Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Natio

Re: [HACKERS] Little note to php coders

2002-10-08 Thread Vince Vielhaber
Right? Don't see what you're complaining about. I get teh 7.2.1 admin guide. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00

Re: [HACKERS] Just a thought

2002-10-09 Thread Vince Vielhaber
tyle. Vince. -- ====== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSHemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pop4.net 56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts

Re: [HACKERS] Is regress/report.php in use?

2002-10-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Gee. I didn't know that existed. We are probably better off doing it > via mailing list so we can discuss the results. What do you mean you didn't know it existed? It's been there for the last few releases (since 7.1). You've even submitted to it!

Re: [HACKERS] Is regress/report.php in use?

2002-10-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > Gee. I didn't know that existed. We are probably better off doing it > > > via mailing list so we can discuss the resul

Re: [HACKERS] Is regress/report.php in use?

2002-10-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > to be honest ... I forgot it was there too :( Just means I'm gonna have to do a bunch of popup ads! ** ducking and running > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Bruce Momjian wro

Re: [HACKERS] RC1?

2002-11-12 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Are we ready for RC1 yet? This is Tuesday, you can only ask on Fridays :) Vince. -- http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com Internet radio: It's not file sharing, it's just radio. ---(e

Re: [HACKERS] Time to move on...

2002-11-15 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > Just a quick note to mention that I've resigned from the PostgreSQL > steering committee. It has been a lot of fun and very rewarding to > participate in PostgreSQL development over the last six years, but it is > time to take a break and to move on to

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

2002-11-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > Glad you liked it. But that doesn't change the fact that it obscured the > > release to the point that many people didn't even know it was released. > > I found out by folks complaining about broken links. > > Hrm - the subject said it all,

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

2002-11-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 29 Nov 2002, Ryan Mahoney wrote: > Scroll down and read the rest of, it's an excellent announcement! If > the website and mirrors made mention of the release (as of 8:19PM CST > they don't!) and the message was sent to all the mailing lists, there > would probably be less confusion. When I re

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

2002-11-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Has there been a release? It certainly hasn't been announced in the usual > > places that I monitor. > > Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that > copy of the message never arriv

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

2002-11-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > Marc claimed he'd put out the announcement on pgsql-announce, but that > > > copy of the message never arrived here (it did show up on pgsql-general > > > though). Evidently you and Vince never got it either ... > > > > After alot of searc

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

2002-11-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
xury of a large screen 'cuze I'm reading from a remote site with horrible resolution or just an 80x25 screen. > > ------- > > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

2002-11-29 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Justin Clift wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120 > > > column wide, 38 row xterm. There wa

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

2002-11-30 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Neil Conway wrote: > > On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:32, Justin Clift wrote: > > > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > > > > Yes it would. But while on the subject, why did you only mention it's > > > >

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres 7.3 announcement on postgresql.org

2002-12-02 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > > FYI, Vince, I started reading all my email (using elm) in a special 120 > > > column wide, 38

Re: PostgreSQL in Universities (Was: Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 Wishlist)

2002-12-03 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote: > > > > Excellent. Are there any other people involved in PostgreSQL and > > > universities or educational institutions? If so we could put something > > > together about experiences for the advocacy Web site. >

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-03 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Dave Page wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 03 December 2002 19:12 > > To: Bruce Momjian > > Cc: PostgreSQL-development > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global > > Development Group Announces

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-03 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Dave Page wrote: > > > I could have sworn we used to have a bunch of ftp mirrors for downloads. > > Come to think of it I rewrote/stole a load of Vince's PHP code to allow > > you to select one from the portal recently. Are we not u

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > Yup, as with doing anything for the firs ttime, the press release itself > > > had its 'bugs' ... considering how many times Josh asked for comments on > > >

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Marc G. Fournier writes: > > > > > Yup, as with doing anything for the firs ttime, the press release itself > > > had its 'bugs' ... considering how many times Josh asked for comments on > > > it, I'm s

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Justin Clift writes: > > > > > Of course we are, it's just that we're also trying to direct people to > > > the Advocacy site where there is a lot more info, in a lot more languages. > > > > Why don't w

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Dave Page wrote: > > > I'll preempt the 'this was all discussed on -advocacy, you should have > > been there' response with yet another agreement with Vince :-) - I too > > am getting far too much mail these days and another list is

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-04 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > > > > That wasn't stronger, it was fluffier. It was full of buzzwords that > > > were masking the actual content. Are you trying to hid

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > Marc G. Fournier writes: > > > > > It isn't, but those working on -advocacy were asked to help come up with a > > > stronger release *announcement* then we've had in the past ... > > > > Consider that a failed experiment. Post

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote: > Well, my previous employer uses postgresql, but they were under constant > assault from their clients to use oracle or db2. Technically there was no > reason to switch, but if your choice is switch databases or go out of > business, there really isn't muc

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Brian Knox wrote: > Speaking from the perspective of a long time postgresql user, who > currently has several very mission critical applications using postgresql > on the back end, at a very large company... > > I can say the one consequence of the problem that I have run into

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote: > On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 03:28, Dave Page wrote: > > www is a closed group consisting of a few of us who actually do the work > > on the sites. > > This is one of the primary reasons the sites are so fractured. We have 4 > different mailing lists for website devel

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-07 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Josh Berkus wrote: > Dave, > > > > > > > BTW, we do coordinate with the Website development group > > > > When did that happen then? I think I must have blinked :-) > > Marc and Justin are periodically keeping the Advocacy group informed > of progress on wwwdevel, and we were

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-08 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Robert Treat wrote: > > > > > >>Well, my previous employer uses postgresql, but they were under constant > >>assault from their clients to use oracle or db2. Techni

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group

2002-12-08 Thread Vince Vielhaber
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Justin Clift wrote: > Vince Vielhaber wrote: > > Because of this taken from the above quoted text: > > > > "they were under constant assault from their clients to use oracle or db2" > > > > Last I looked neither Oracle or DB2 were op

  1   2   3   4   >