On Aug 8, 8:03 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
> I'm done here.
Well thats just great, now how will we ever know what the one char
change was. Hmm.
>>> a = 'somestring'
>>> -a
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
-a
TypeError: bad operand type for unary -: 'str'
Go figure!
-
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro
wrote:
> In message , W. eWatson wrote:
>
>> Believe me I had no intent of expanding this thread beyond looking for a
>> straight and simple insight to Python distribution (portability,
>> whatever) and how to get my partner squared away. The ge
In message , W. eWatson wrote:
> Believe me I had no intent of expanding this thread beyond looking for a
> straight and simple insight to Python distribution (portability,
> whatever) and how to get my partner squared away. The general issue
> seems to drifted off on its own accord.
“Drifted off
"W. eWatson" wrote:
> I now have the answer I need, and I do not care one more wit
> about a one character change.
>
> I'm done here.
That's a fantastic response to give to people who were actually
willing to sacrifice their time to help you with your problems. I'm
always stunned at those who com
> Add-Remove would be a very good answer, except for one thing. Understand
> that I'm in Win7 so CP takes on a different form. On Control Panel
> Add-Remove, I can find exactly two Python files: Python 2.5, and
> python-Numpy-1.2.0. No scipy anything.
Well, it should be there. Perhaps it was inst
On 8/8/2010 4:08 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
...
python-Numpy-1.2.0. No scipy anything. Well, this is interesting. I just
noticed Martin v. Loewis on the Python 2.5 entry. That's you, right?
You are conflating so many issues at the same time, it is very
difficult to follow what you are doing.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 10:10 AM, W. eWatson wrote:
> On 8/7/2010 4:45 PM, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
>>>
>>> To add to the msg I just sent to M. Torrie. We are given the msi
>>> programs for Python, PIL,matplotlib, and numpy. The question of how to
>>> uninstall and re-install a different version rem
On 08/08/2010 03:10 AM, W. eWatson wrote:
> I think I posted the errors my partner got above. Let me look. Yes,
> here's the copy.
> He gets
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "C:\Documents and
> Settings\HP_Administrator.DavesDesktop\Desktop\NC-FireballReport20100729.py",
> line 40,
On 8/7/2010 4:45 PM, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
To add to the msg I just sent to M. Torrie. We are given the msi
programs for Python, PIL,matplotlib, and numpy. The question of how to
uninstall and re-install a different version remains.
I'd claim that this is not the real question. The real quest
> To add to the msg I just sent to M. Torrie. We are given the msi
> programs for Python, PIL,matplotlib, and numpy. The question of how to
> uninstall and re-install a different version remains.
I'd claim that this is not the real question. The real question is,
instead: "What specific error did
"W. eWatson" writes:
> Yes, code reversal programs have been around for many, many decades.
> Try one on MS Word or Adobe Acrobat. :-)
Interesting examples. What “important stuff” from those programs has not
been “ripped off”, to use your terms?
Is there anything remaining in those programs whi
On 8/7/2010 2:26 PM, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
Am 07.08.2010 23:01, schrieb Michael Torrie:
On 08/07/2010 01:17 PM, W. eWatson wrote:
Presumably I have him somehow delete the numpy site-package, the numpy
1.2.0 package? Just drill his way dow from the .../lib/site_packages?
Then install 1.2.0. He
On 8/7/2010 2:01 PM, Michael Torrie wrote:
On 08/07/2010 01:17 PM, W. eWatson wrote:
Presumably I have him somehow delete the numpy site-package, the numpy
1.2.0 package? Just drill his way dow from the .../lib/site_packages?
Then install 1.2.0. He's missed the boat on that before by not followi
Am 07.08.2010 23:01, schrieb Michael Torrie:
> On 08/07/2010 01:17 PM, W. eWatson wrote:
>> Presumably I have him somehow delete the numpy site-package, the numpy
>> 1.2.0 package? Just drill his way dow from the .../lib/site_packages?
>> Then install 1.2.0. He's missed the boat on that before by
On 08/07/2010 01:17 PM, W. eWatson wrote:
> Presumably I have him somehow delete the numpy site-package, the numpy
> 1.2.0 package? Just drill his way dow from the .../lib/site_packages?
> Then install 1.2.0. He's missed the boat on that before by not following
> instructions.
Wait. I'm confus
> As an example, my inexperienced Python partner 30 miles away has gotten
> out of step somehow. I think by installing a different version of numpy
> than I use. I gave him a program we both use months ago, and he had no
> trouble. (We both use IDLE on 2.5). I made a one character change to it
> an
On 8/6/2010 2:23 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message, W. eWatson wrote:
I made a one character change to it and sent him the new py file. He can't
execute it.
What exactly was the problem?
I put a minus sign in front of a variable. I had him use the shell to
check his version numpy, w
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:58:24 -0700, W. eWatson wrote:
> Is there a complete illustration of using disutils? Our only
> dependencies are on Python Org material. We use no commercial or
> licensed code.
Oh my, the sheer ignorance that sentence reveals.
Python and the standard library *is* licensed
On Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:50:14 -0700, W. eWatson wrote:
> As an example, my inexperienced Python partner 30 miles away has gotten
> out of step somehow. I think by installing a different version of numpy
> than I use. I gave him a program we both use months ago, and he had no
> trouble. (We both use
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:35:38 -0700, W. eWatson wrote:
> So you think Python is part of open software in terms of distributing a
> "product"?
Python itself *is* open source software. It doesn't *require* you to
write open source software.
> So I should stick to C, where one can distribute progra
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 08:00:55 -0700, W. eWatson wrote:
>>> I would think there are some small time and big time Python players
>>> who sell executable versions of their programs for profit?
>>
>> Yes. What's your point?
> That someone must know how to distribute them without having the source
> cod
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:58 AM, W. eWatson wrote:
> Is there a complete illustration of using disutils? Our only dependencies
> are on Python Org material. We use no commercial or licensed code.
http://tinyurl.com/3yhwjfj
Geremy Condra
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> As an example, my inexperienced Python partner 30 miles away has gotten
> out of step somehow. I think by installing a different version of numpy
> than I use. I gave him a program we both use months ago, and he had no
> trouble. (We both use IDLE on 2.5). I made a one character change to it
> an
On Aug 5, 9:50 pm, "W. eWatson" wrote:
> In my on-again-off-again experience with Python for 18 months,
> portability seems an issue.
>
> As an example, my inexperienced Python partner 30 miles away has gotten
> out of step somehow. I think by installing a different version of numpy
> than I use.
W. eWatson wrote:
> So you think Python is part of open software in terms of distributing a
> "product"? So I should stick to C, where one can distribute programs w/o
> revealing code details, and having a customer compile the code? It's
No, I'm trying to make you reconsider what you're going to
On 8/6/2010 10:31 AM, geremy condra wrote:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:00 AM, W. eWatson wrote:
I would think there are some small time and big time Python players who
sell
executable versions of their programs for profit?
Yes. What's your point?
That someone must know how to distribute them
On 8/6/2010 9:03 AM, Peter Otten wrote:
...
Seriously, I try to make a joke once in a while, usually with devastating
results. The idea you were meant to take away was that once you start
thinking about a protection scheme there is always a next step until you
reach the point where your software
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:00 AM, W. eWatson wrote:
>
>>> I would think there are some small time and big time Python players who
>>> sell
>>> executable versions of their programs for profit?
>>
>> Yes. What's your point?
>
> That someone must know how to distribute them without having the source c
W. eWatson wrote:
> I can't respond to otten directly, since he uses gmane. Here's my
> response.
>
> W. eWatson wrote:
>
> >>> >>> I would think there are some small time and big time Python
> players who
> >>> >>> sell executable versions of their programs for profit?
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes.
I can't respond to otten directly, since he uses gmane. Here's my response.
W. eWatson wrote:
>>> >>> I would think there are some small time and big time Python
players who
>>> >>> sell executable versions of their programs for profit?
>> >>
>> >> Yes. What's your point?
> > That someone must
W. eWatson wrote:
>>> I would think there are some small time and big time Python players who
>>> sell executable versions of their programs for profit?
>>
>> Yes. What's your point?
> That someone must know how to distribute them without having the source
> code ripped off.
Yes, but he won't tel
I would think there are some small time and big time Python players who sell
executable versions of their programs for profit?
Yes. What's your point?
That someone must know how to distribute them without having the source
code ripped off.
disutils. Sounds familiar. I'm pretty sure I was u
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:28 AM, W. eWatson wrote:
> On 8/5/2010 7:45 PM, geremy condra wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:50 PM, W. eWatson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In my on-again-off-again experience with Python for 18 months,
>>> portability
>>>
>>> seems an issue.
>>>
>>> As an example, my inexper
In message , W. eWatson wrote:
> I made a one character change to it and sent him the new py file. He can't
> execute it.
What exactly was the problem?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:28 PM, W. eWatson wrote:
> On 8/5/2010 7:45 PM, geremy condra wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:50 PM, W. eWatson wrote:
>>>
>>> In my on-again-off-again experience with Python for 18 months,
>>> portability
>>> seems an issue.
>>>
>>> As an example, my inexperienced
On 8/5/2010 7:45 PM, geremy condra wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:50 PM, W. eWatson wrote:
In my on-again-off-again experience with Python for 18 months, portability
seems an issue.
As an example, my inexperienced Python partner 30 miles away has gotten out
of step somehow. I think by install
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:50 PM, W. eWatson wrote:
> In my on-again-off-again experience with Python for 18 months, portability
> seems an issue.
>
> As an example, my inexperienced Python partner 30 miles away has gotten out
> of step somehow. I think by installing a different version of numpy tha
In my on-again-off-again experience with Python for 18 months,
portability seems an issue.
As an example, my inexperienced Python partner 30 miles away has gotten
out of step somehow. I think by installing a different version of numpy
than I use. I gave him a program we both use months ago, an
38 matches
Mail list logo
