I've worked around this issue:
1. login the server, run
svn list https://.
2. accept the certificate permanently.
3. then copy files generated in ~/.subversion/auth/svn.simple(server) to
/var/www/reviewboard(your site name)/data/.subversion/auth/svn.xxx
4. change the file/group ownership
OK. My bad. Somehow I upgraded the wrong site. So the database was not
upgraded and the error was coming of missing db tables. Doing rb-site
upgrade for the correct host fixed this.
Sorry for this.
Thanks
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 3:03:47 PM UTC-8, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> Deprecation
I am not an expert in this. So not sure what else to look for. Even though
they are deprecationwarning, they seem to have error tag. Can this be an
issue? The apache log also has these entries.
[Tue Jan 08 23:04:46 2013] [error] import md5
/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/mod_python/importer.
DeprecationWarnings are harmless. There's probably something else (either
in the apache log or the reviewboard log).
-David
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Custom Apps wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today, I upgraded my review board installation to 1.7.1. By doing this, My
> site is broken. I get internal
Hi,
Today, I upgraded my review board installation to 1.7.1. By doing this, My
site is broken. I get internal server error. In the apache log file, I see
the following lines.
[Tue Jan 08 14:55:08 2013] [notice] Apache/2.2.14 (Ubuntu)
Phusion_Passenger/2.2.7 PHP/5.3.2-1ubuntu4.17 with Suhosin-
We've been making regular backups of our RB 1.5.5 database, and I decided
it was time to verify that we can restore the DB to a new install in case
our server fails. The backups are made with mysqlhotcopy, so I understand
they can be restored by simply stopping the mysql service, copying the
b
I'd be happy to do some code-level digging. Any tips on where to start?
Thanks
Liam
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To
Hi all,
I am also facing this issue on 1.7.1. Both buttons are disabled the error
log says "Server certificate verification failed: issuer is not trusted".
The data directory is owned by apache2 user. I am using apache+ mod_wsgi.
It will be a great help if somebody can suggest a solution.
Th
Hi All,
I'm trying to setup Reviewboard(version 0.7) to authenticate with a
htpasswd file. Followed the instructions
here, http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/extending/auth-backends/
and got to the point where my backend started appearing in the
Authentication dropdown from Admin pre
Unfortunately this is a known bug in 1.7.1. We'll be putting out a 1.7.2 soon
with a fix.
-David
On Jan 7, 2013, at 11:36 PM, Bing wrote:
> Hi, all,
> When I create a new repo (SVN) with https:// link, the following error
> message shows after click "Save" button.
>
>
> A verified HTT
Well, I guess I misunderstood the meaning of the configuration field
(somewhat), and found what could be a problem in the code. My LDAP server
does not allow anonymous binds, and so I've had to take caution in
configuring what just about every other tool calls the "bind account" and
"bind passw
Hi Stephen,
Bug raised as requested. I didn't see a place to set the CC field on the
google/reviewboard bug tracker, so here's the URL so you can "star" it and get
yourself CCed.
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2850
Thanks,
Paul
>
> F
Hi!
We just managed to install Review Board on one of our organisation's "web
hotel" (a server which we don't have direct access to), so we have a
working installation and we can reach the web interface. We also learned
from you that for ClearCase, post-review is not only recommended but
requi
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
> On 2013-01-07 12:20, Erik Putrycz wrote:
>>
>> Are there any downloadable appliances with Review Board 1.7? I found
>> bitnami review board but they only have 1.6
In BitNami we are already working on the installers and virtual
appliances fo
Hi all,
right now we are altering our Reviewboard installation to meet our new
development requirements. In this requirements it is specified that
only reviewed code is committed into our release repository (in order
to achieve a safety certificate).
Currently we are having the problem that in cas
15 matches
Mail list logo
