i have tried to built like this,but still not working
#!/usr/local/bin/perl
use LWP::UserAgent;
use MIME::Base64;
$url="http://codereview.xyz.com/api/review-requests/";;
$newurl="http://codereview.xyz.com/r/new/";;
$user="admin";
$pwd="admin";
$text="$user:$pwd";
$text = encode_base64($text);
#
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> On Thu 21 Feb 2013 10:14:29 AM CET, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> 1.7.6 is out. The big highlight is support for Perforce ticket-based
>> auth, which I know will make a lot of you happy.
>>
>> There's also a scattering o
Hi Christian,
It is Firefox. Below is the requested info. If it helps, once the review
gets into this state, the person can reproduce at will as their review
comes up waiting to published or discarded. Thanks,
-amac
URL
Status
Domain
Size
Timeline
Firebug's log limit has been reached. 0 ent
Hello-
I am migrating from RB 1.6.3 on SQLite and local git repos to RB 1.7.5 on
PostgreSQL and remote git repos and cgit. I have successfully migrated the
data and reviewboard 1.7.5 is running, however, the diff viewer is broken.
It seems that RB is passing non-existent SHA hashes to cgit so c
On 2013-02-25 11:54, age...@themactionfaction.com wrote:
I am migrating from RB 1.6.3 on SQLite and local git repos to RB 1.7.5 on
PostgreSQL and remote git repos and cgit. I have successfully migrated the
data and reviewboard 1.7.5 is running, however, the diff viewer is broken.
It seems that RB
Can you get full logs of the output of all of those steps and attach
them/pastebin them somewhere?
-David
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:27 AM, chuck j wrote:
> Thanks David for responding my email.
>
> Here are the steps which i followed.
>
> My Linux box has el5 has following openssl package.
>
Okay, I see a lot of requests that are all valid-looking, and returning proper
HTTP 200 results. Nothing there looks wrong.
I don't see any payload responses, so maybe that just wasn't included in your
dump.
I'd need to know exactly which of those requests the 200 error is coming from.
(It won
We recently had someone leave our team, and I would like to reassign all of
the review requests currently assigned to him to someone new. Is there a
way to do that without opening all the unclosed requests one by one,
checking to see if he was assigned, and editing the "people" field one at a
On Monday, February 25, 2013 2:17:07 PM UTC-5, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>
> On 2013-02-25 11:54, age...@themactionfaction.com wrote:
> > I am migrating from RB 1.6.3 on SQLite and local git repos to RB 1.7.5
> on
> > PostgreSQL and remote git repos and cgit. I have successfully migrated
> the
Hello, we have encountered what seems to be a bug in both reviewboard and
cgit when using rb with a remote git repo via cgit. This is due to a
migration from local to remote git repos.
Some of our reviews include short git hashes (from uploaded diffs, I
assume), which rb then complains about:
You'd want to look at the source_revision field in the diffviewer_filediff
table. Alternatively, if you'd like to do it with a management command or
the django shell, it's the source_revision field in the
reviewboard.diffviewer.models.FileDiff model.
-David
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:57 PM, wr
Paul,
You could write a django management command (or use the django shell) to do
this. It would require some knowledge of how the django ORM works, but if
there's a lot of them, it might be faster.
-David
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Paul Lynch wrote:
> We recently had someone leave ou
Hi,
Is there a way I can disable the feature that automatically starts to edit
a field when I click on it? I want to have to click the pencil icon to
edit a field.
Thanks.
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know
13 matches
Mail list logo
