Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9855#issuecomment-158314839
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9855#issuecomment-158314833
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9855#issuecomment-158314558
**[Test build #46393 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46393/consoleFull)**
for PR 9855 at commit
[`82d9c42`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-158314394
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-158314388
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-158314376
**[Test build #46403 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46403/consoleFull)**
for PR 9858 at commit
[`a86feca`](https://git
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858#issuecomment-158314030
**[Test build #46403 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46403/consoleFull)**
for PR 9858 at commit
[`a86feca`](https://gith
GitHub user saucam opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9858
SPARK-11878: Eliminate distribute by in case group by is present with
exactly the same grouping expressions
For queries like :
select <> from table group by a distribute by a
we can eliminate
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9849
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9849#issuecomment-158313179
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-1.6. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158313052
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-1.6. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6767#issuecomment-158312879
**[Test build #46396 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46396/consoleFull)**
for PR 6767 at commit
[`84c45c0`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6767#issuecomment-158312914
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6767#issuecomment-158312916
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9826#issuecomment-158312175
@thunterdb Could you try the following CSS:
~~~css
.left-menu-wrapper {
position: absolute;
height: 100%;
width: 256px;
margin-top: -20
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9849#issuecomment-158301183
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9849#issuecomment-158301188
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9750#issuecomment-158300696
It actually is a common practice to include function for types on the same
help page of the function name.
As you can see
https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/l
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9849#issuecomment-158300715
**[Test build #46401 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46401/consoleFull)**
for PR 9849 at commit
[`3ddafb4`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158300642
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158300641
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158300580
**[Test build #46400 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46400/consoleFull)**
for PR 9851 at commit
[`e9932ba`](https://git
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9750#issuecomment-158299954
Sorry for late response. It can fix my issue mentioned at JIRA. But I also
found new issues that the generated doc of ```describe``` will include the
```summary``` me
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9857#issuecomment-158298633
**[Test build #46402 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46402/consoleFull)**
for PR 9857 at commit
[`ffe29f7`](https://gith
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9722#issuecomment-158296762
ERROR: Timeout after 15 minutes
ERROR: Error fetching remote repo 'origin'
hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from
https://github.com/apache/spark.gi
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9857
[SPARK-11877][test-maven] Prevent agg. fallback conf. from leaking across
test suites
This patch fixes an issue where the
`spark.sql.TungstenAggregate.testFallbackStartsAt` SQLConf setting was no
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9848#issuecomment-158294477
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9848#issuecomment-158294479
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9848#issuecomment-158294405
**[Test build #46394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46394/consoleFull)**
for PR 9848 at commit
[`1a29f23`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-158294225
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-158294227
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9839#discussion_r45439309
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StandardScaler.scala ---
@@ -189,7 +189,6 @@ object StandardScalerModel extends
MLReadable[Standard
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-158294149
**[Test build #46395 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46395/consoleFull)**
for PR 8563 at commit
[`66cc11d`](https://git
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9839#discussion_r45439149
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/StandardScalerSuite.scala ---
@@ -116,23 +116,19 @@ class StandardScalerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9849#issuecomment-158293680
**[Test build #46401 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46401/consoleFull)**
for PR 9849 at commit
[`3ddafb4`](https://gith
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158293513
Oops, I guess you're right. OK I verified that it's creating and removing
one tempdir:
```/Users/josephkb/spark/target/tmp/org.apache.spark.ml.feature.IDFSuite-7b1fd5
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158293411
**[Test build #46400 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46400/consoleFull)**
for PR 9851 at commit
[`e9932ba`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158293348
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158293350
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9856
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9856#issuecomment-158293000
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-1.6. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#discussion_r45438880
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/TempDirectory.scala
---
@@ -35,11 +35,11 @@ trait TempDirectory extends BeforeAndAfterAll { self:
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#discussion_r45438806
--- Diff: mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/TempDirectory.scala
---
@@ -35,11 +35,11 @@ trait TempDirectory extends BeforeAndAfterAll { self:
Suit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9856#issuecomment-158292794
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9856#issuecomment-158292793
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9849#issuecomment-158292753
Sorry for the mistakes ..
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9856#issuecomment-158292747
**[Test build #46397 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46397/consoleFull)**
for PR 9856 at commit
[`ccaa377`](https://git
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9849#discussion_r45438710
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -129,6 +131,52 @@ class KMeansModel private[ml] (
val data = dataset
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9849#discussion_r45438708
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -129,6 +131,52 @@ class KMeansModel private[ml] (
val data = dataset
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9685#discussion_r45438482
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -248,12 +249,17 @@ class HiveQuerySuite extends HiveCompariso
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9838
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9838#issuecomment-158291862
Merged into master and branch-1.6. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9836
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9836#issuecomment-158291677
Merged into master and branch-1.6. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-158291587
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-158291589
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-158291584
**[Test build #46398 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46398/consoleFull)**
for PR 8563 at commit
[`ac0f3cd`](https://git
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158291503
OK updated
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9830#issuecomment-158291462
@yhuai Thank you Yin.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-158291239
**[Test build #46398 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46398/consoleFull)**
for PR 8563 at commit
[`ac0f3cd`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9856#issuecomment-158290877
**[Test build #46397 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46397/consoleFull)**
for PR 9856 at commit
[`ccaa377`](https://gith
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158290946
Yes, use ```createTempDir(namePrefix=class.getName)``` is a good choice.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158290803
ah then we should use `createTempDir(namePrefix=class.getName)`...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158290339
@mengxr In the line you're referencing, "root" is the className.
@yanboliang Your suggestion sounds good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9856
[SPARK-11875] [ML] [PySpark] Update doc for PySpark HasCheckpointInterval
Update doc for PySpark ```HasCheckpointInterval``` that users can
understand how to disable checkpoint.
You can merge t
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9851#issuecomment-158285569
I don't quite get this one. First of all, it seems that `createTempDir`
should return a temporary directory of name "o.a.s.ml.feature.Binarizer-UUID`
instead of `o.a.s.ml
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6767#issuecomment-158285462
**[Test build #46396 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46396/consoleFull)**
for PR 6767 at commit
[`84c45c0`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#issuecomment-158284604
**[Test build #46395 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46395/consoleFull)**
for PR 8563 at commit
[`66cc11d`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9855#issuecomment-158284581
**[Test build #46393 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46393/consoleFull)**
for PR 9855 at commit
[`82d9c42`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9848#issuecomment-158284548
**[Test build #46394 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46394/consoleFull)**
for PR 9848 at commit
[`1a29f23`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-158284061
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-158284063
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-158284007
**[Test build #46387 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46387/consoleFull)**
for PR 9297 at commit
[`690277e`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-158283803
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-158283769
**[Test build #46386 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46386/consoleFull)**
for PR 9297 at commit
[`690277e`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9297#issuecomment-158283804
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9685#issuecomment-158283567
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9685#issuecomment-158283568
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9685#issuecomment-158283488
**[Test build #46391 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46391/consoleFull)**
for PR 9685 at commit
[`c4f2da1`](https://git
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9848#issuecomment-158283462
@mengxr @yanboliang Ready for review!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9855
[SPARK-11876] [SQL] Support printSchema in DataSet API
DataSet APIs look great! However, I am lost when doing multiple level
joins. For example,
```
val ds1 = Seq(("a", 1), ("b", 2)).toD
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-158281222
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-158281223
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9530#issuecomment-158281171
**[Test build #46388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46388/consoleFull)**
for PR 9530 at commit
[`c5a218d`](https://git
Github user nilmeier commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#discussion_r45436164
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -402,4 +441,474 @@ class BlockMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9810#issuecomment-158279287
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9810#issuecomment-158279284
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9810#issuecomment-158278983
**[Test build #46385 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46385/consoleFull)**
for PR 9810 at commit
[`c263c14`](https://git
Github user dskrvk closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9696
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user dskrvk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9696#issuecomment-158274392
Yes, I believe rebasing instead of merging is the problem since it rewrites
history, and if some of the changes I'm rebasing have already been pushed to my
remote, it fre
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9854#issuecomment-158274097
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9854#issuecomment-158274096
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9854#issuecomment-158274046
**[Test build #46389 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/46389/consoleFull)**
for PR 9854 at commit
[`949db73`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9797#issuecomment-158273462
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9797#issuecomment-158273463
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user nilmeier commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8563#discussion_r45433858
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/BlockMatrix.scala
---
@@ -402,4 +441,474 @@ class BlockMatrix @Since("1.3.0") (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9722#issuecomment-158273026
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9722#issuecomment-158273027
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9696#issuecomment-158273031
Sounds similar to what I do, except I don't do step 3 (I just push to a
branch on my fork and create a PR from that). Maybe you're doing something
wrong in that step (lik
1 - 100 of 707 matches
Mail list logo
