Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15723
**[Test build #67963 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67963/consoleFull)**
for PR 15723 at commit
[`01cfa00`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67962/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
**[Test build #67962 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67962/consoleFull)**
for PR 15677 at commit
[`b2fb5e6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
**[Test build #67962 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67962/consoleFull)**
for PR 15677 at commit
[`b2fb5e6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15723
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
Oh wow, so it's deterministically broken, but some suite must be leaking a
conf that disables the flag. This explains why I couldn't find a preceding
suite to blame for the flake - it's merely t
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15723
**[Test build #67961 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67961/consoleFull)**
for PR 15723 at commit
[`5face4a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15723
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67961/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15723
**[Test build #67961 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67961/consoleFull)**
for PR 15723 at commit
[`5face4a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688#discussion_r86080979
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/InMemoryCatalog.scala
---
@@ -471,11 +471,30 @@ class InMemoryCatalog(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15728
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67951/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15728
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15728
**[Test build #67951 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67951/consoleFull)**
for PR 15728 at commit
[`6b7796f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
`spark.sql.hive.metastorePartitionPruning` is seen in failed test, not in
successful test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15011#discussion_r86080684
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -127,6 +127,18 @@ class SessionCatalogSuite
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15675
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15675
LGTM. Thanks! Merging to master, 2.1 and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15011#discussion_r86080437
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -127,6 +127,18 @@ class SessionCatalogSuite
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67952/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
Merging in master/branch-2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
**[Test build #67952 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67952/consoleFull)**
for PR 15711 at commit
[`29071bb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15011#discussion_r86080198
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -127,6 +127,18 @@ class SessionCatalogSuite e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15327
**[Test build #3394 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3394/consoleFull)**
for PR 15327 at commit
[`4ebf501`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15723
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67953/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15723
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15327
**[Test build #3394 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3394/consoleFull)**
for PR 15327 at commit
[`4ebf501`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15688#discussion_r86079926
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/InMemoryCatalog.scala
---
@@ -471,11 +471,30 @@ class InMemoryCatalog(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15723
**[Test build #67953 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67953/consoleFull)**
for PR 15723 at commit
[`a5c0b16`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15327
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15723
**[Test build #3393 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3393/consoleFull)**
for PR 15723 at commit
[`a5c0b16`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67956/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #67956 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67956/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
[`77bc5ab`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15729
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67958/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15729
**[Test build #67958 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67958/consoleFull)**
for PR 15729 at commit
[`dadfaa9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15729
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15711
**[Test build #3392 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3392/consoleFull)**
for PR 15711 at commit
[`29071bb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15722#discussion_r86078969
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/unsafe/map/BytesToBytesMap.java ---
@@ -170,6 +170,8 @@
private long peakMemoryUsedBytes = 0L;
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r86078940
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +316,114 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends SparkFunS
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705
LGTM, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r86078676
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +316,114 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends SparkFunS
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15722
@davies - We fixed a similar issue with `UnsafeExternalSorter` in
SPARK-14363.
Basically following scenario is leading to OOM - Lets say we have total 4G
of memory available that is shared
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
reopen it now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
GitHub user wangmiao1981 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
[SparkR][Test]:remove unnecessary suppressWarnings
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In test_mllib.R, there are two unnecessary suppressWarnings. This PR just
remo
Github user wangmiao1981 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r86078546
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +316,114 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends SparkFunS
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
Now, I try to close and reopen it to trigger another windows test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717
Looks like there is an actual test failure.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15717#discussion_r86078426
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/StructField.scala ---
@@ -74,4 +74,11 @@ case class StructField(
def getComment(): Optio
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15727#discussion_r86078124
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/Window.scala ---
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ object Window {
* {{{
* import org.apach
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644
**[Test build #67960 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67960/consoleFull)**
for PR 15644 at commit
[`6a02634`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15644#discussion_r86077923
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImplSuite.scala ---
@@ -282,6 +316,114 @@ class TaskSchedulerImplSuite extends SparkFunS
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
**[Test build #67959 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67959/consoleFull)**
for PR 15567 at commit
[`ababaa9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
I reverted the changes I made to enforce `Projection.initialize`, which
touched too many files and most of them doesn't really need to handle
nondeterministic expressions. The current implementation
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15027
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15727
@david-weiluo-ren this already has a conflict. Can you update it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15727#discussion_r86077607
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/Window.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +82,29 @@ object Window {
* "current row", while "-1" means
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15027
Merging in master/branch-2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15729
**[Test build #67958 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67958/consoleFull)**
for PR 15729 at commit
[`dadfaa9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
For the specific failure here, it was due to not syncing the latest version
between the releases for Winodws and the others (when R 3.3.2 was released). As
we use a fixed version, R 3.3.1 now (n
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67946/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user jagadeesanas2 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15729
[SPARK-18133] [branch-2.0] [Examples] [ML] [Python ML Pipeline Examplâ¦
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
[Fix] [branch-2.0] In Python 3, there is only one integer
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15677
**[Test build #67946 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67946/consoleFull)**
for PR 15677 at commit
[`a6b50eb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15567
**[Test build #67957 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67957/consoleFull)**
for PR 15567 at commit
[`553c6a5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #67956 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67956/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
[`77bc5ab`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15700
This might not handle packages the best it can on mesos but that could be a
follow-up
@sun-rui
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67950/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15705
I think you don't have to since this is just the test suite.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016, 8:49 PM Wenchen Fan wrote:
> *@cloud-fan* commented on this pull request.
> -
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15725
**[Test build #67950 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67950/consoleFull)**
for PR 15725 at commit
[`0dca3ac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86076296
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -226,6 +227,63 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
}
Github user jagadeesanas2 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15728
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15728
could you close this and create a PR against branch-2.0 instead of master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86075964
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,53 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86075872
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,53 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #67955 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67955/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
[`88fea8e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67955/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15314
**[Test build #67955 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67955/consoleFull)**
for PR 15314 at commit
[`88fea8e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15484#discussion_r86075526
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -229,10 +235,14 @@ class Analyzer(
* Group Count:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15484#discussion_r86075344
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -229,10 +235,14 @@ class Analyzer(
* Group Count:
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15484#discussion_r86075252
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -216,10 +216,16 @@ class Analyzer(
* Group Count:
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15024#discussion_r86075163
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/PathOptionSuite.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/*
+* Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86075107
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/ddl.scala ---
@@ -418,27 +419,53 @@ case class AlterTableRenamePartitionCommand(
Github user CodingCat commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15702#discussion_r86075063
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StatefulAggregate.scala
---
@@ -104,85 +110,105 @@ case class StateStoreSaveExe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15697
@HyukjinKwon the time window when download of an older version for windows
could fail seem concerning. Is there a way to address that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to th
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
Merging in master. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15608
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15704#discussion_r86074588
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/AstBuilder.scala
---
@@ -204,6 +207,38 @@ class AstBuilder extends SqlBaseBaseVisi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15608
merged to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67949/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15673
**[Test build #67949 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67949/consoleFull)**
for PR 15673 at commit
[`8d468ac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15659
**[Test build #67954 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67954/consoleFull)**
for PR 15659 at commit
[`7af912a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
1 - 100 of 763 matches
Mail list logo
