Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14830
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72859/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14830
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14830
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14830
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r100975590
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -944,15 +981,27 @@ class GeneralizedLinearRegre
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r100975556
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -406,6 +435,14 @@ object GeneralizedLinearRegre
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r100975164
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegression.scala
---
@@ -168,6 +179,7 @@ private[regression] trait
Gen
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r100974912
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -798,77 +798,160 @@ class GeneralizedLinea
Github user actuaryzhang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699#discussion_r100974891
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/GeneralizedLinearRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -798,77 +798,160 @@ class GeneralizedLinea
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
**[Test build #72858 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72858/testReport)**
for PR 16699 at commit
[`e95c25b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
**[Test build #72857 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72857/testReport)**
for PR 16699 at commit
[`90d68a6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/90
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16699
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72856/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72856 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72856/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
[`c64d50b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100970965
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/LSH.scala ---
@@ -222,17 +222,18 @@ private[ml] abstract class LSHModel[T <: LSHModel[T]]
}
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100971720
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -755,6 +945,103 @@ def maxAbs(self):
@inherit_doc
+class MinHashLSH(JavaEstimator, LSHParam
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100970887
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/MinHashLSHExample.scala ---
@@ -37,38 +43,45 @@ object MinHashLSHExample {
(0, Vect
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100971229
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/MinHashLSHExample.scala ---
@@ -21,9 +21,15 @@ package org.apache.spark.examples.ml
// $e
Github user zhzhan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16909
@tejasapatil Do you want to fix the BufferedRowIterator for
WholeStageCodegenExec as well? As for inner join, the LinkedList currentRows
would cause the same issue as it buffer the rows from inner j
Github user Pashugan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16913
There must be some misunderstanding. May I have a chance you have a look at
my micro-patch because it has nothing to do with the driver and its options. In
fact, it fixes the call of the "launcher
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16921
Thank you for doing this, this looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16919
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16919
LGTM. Merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user jinxing64 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16901#discussion_r100968529
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGSchedulerSuite.scala ---
@@ -2161,6 +2161,48 @@ class DAGSchedulerSuite extends SparkFunSuite
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16901
@kayousterhout
I've refined accordingly. Sorry for the stupid mistake I made. Please take
another look at this : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user jinxing64 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
@kayousterhout
I've refined accordingly, please take another look : )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16919
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16919
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72854/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72849/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
**[Test build #72849 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72849/testReport)**
for PR 16620 at commit
[`ab8d13e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16919
**[Test build #72854 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72854/testReport)**
for PR 16919 at commit
[`cab668e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
**[Test build #72856 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72856/testReport)**
for PR 16715 at commit
[`c64d50b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c6
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100966548
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -1558,6 +1558,15 @@ for more details on the API.
{% include_example
java/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/JavaBuck
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100966555
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -120,6 +122,198 @@ def getThreshold(self):
return self.getOrDefault(self.threshold)
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100966541
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/MinHashLSHExample.scala ---
@@ -37,38 +38,44 @@ object MinHashLSHExample {
(0, Vecto
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100966552
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/python/ml/bucketed_random_projection_lsh_example.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100966561
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/BucketedRandomProjectionLSHExample.scala
---
@@ -38,40 +39,45 @@ object BucketedRandomProjecti
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100966545
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/ml/JavaBucketedRandomProjectionLSHExample.java
---
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
import org.apache.spark.
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100966554
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -120,6 +122,198 @@ def getThreshold(self):
return self.getOrDefault(self.threshold)
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100966534
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -120,6 +122,198 @@ def getThreshold(self):
return self.getOrDefault(self.threshold)
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100966539
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/BucketedRandomProjectionLSH.scala
---
@@ -111,8 +111,8 @@ class BucketedRandomProjectionLSHModel p
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100966530
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -120,6 +122,198 @@ def getThreshold(self):
return self.getOrDefault(self.threshold)
Github user Yunni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16715#discussion_r100966537
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -120,6 +122,198 @@ def getThreshold(self):
return self.getOrDefault(self.threshold)
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
**[Test build #72855 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72855/testReport)**
for PR 16672 at commit
[`0d947a5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16919
**[Test build #72854 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72854/testReport)**
for PR 16919 at commit
[`cab668e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/ca
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72847/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
@gatorsmile I'd like to take that.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-19583 Thanks~
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16919
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16919
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16395
**[Test build #72847 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72847/testReport)**
for PR 16395 at commit
[`662acc0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16919
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16921
cc @hvanhovell @jiangxb1987
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user ooq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15193
@yaooqinn Do you have any benchmarks on the performance difference? I think
pointTo() is pretty cheap. And does the patch pass the tests? I think valueRow
is not updated correctly in your patch.
---
I
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16739
Let me rewrite the test cases in Scala.
```Scala
val df = spark.range(0, 1, 1, 5)
assert(df.rdd.getNumPartitions == 5)
assert(df.coalesce(3).rdd.getNumPartition
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16915
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72846/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16915
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16915
**[Test build #72846 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72846/testReport)**
for PR 16915 at commit
[`3dd57fd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16920
cc @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user windpiger commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16672#discussion_r100963830
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/DDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1816,4 +1816,127 @@ class DDLSuite extends QueryTest with
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16921
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16921
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72848/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16920
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72845/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16920
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16920
**[Test build #72845 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72845/testReport)**
for PR 16920 at commit
[`e61125a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16921
**[Test build #72848 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72848/testReport)**
for PR 16921 at commit
[`e59cf4c`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
**[Test build #72852 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72852/testReport)**
for PR 16922 at commit
[`c5e46fb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72852/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
**[Test build #72853 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72853/testReport)**
for PR 16674 at commit
[`4872918`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/48
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16674
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16818
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16818
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72844/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16818
**[Test build #72844 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72844/testReport)**
for PR 16818 at commit
[`7ae4e48`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
**[Test build #72852 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72852/testReport)**
for PR 16922 at commit
[`c5e46fb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16918#discussion_r100961000
--- Diff: docs/structured-streaming-kafka-integration.md ---
@@ -119,6 +119,124 @@ ds3.selectExpr("CAST(key AS STRING)", "CAST(value AS
STRING)")
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
**[Test build #72851 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72851/testReport)**
for PR 16922 at commit
[`9ce7cb8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72851/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
**[Test build #72851 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72851/testReport)**
for PR 16922 at commit
[`9ce7cb8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
**[Test build #72850 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72850/testReport)**
for PR 16922 at commit
[`25bdc0f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72850/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
**[Test build #72850 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72850/testReport)**
for PR 16922 at commit
[`25bdc0f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/25
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16922
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
1 - 100 of 618 matches
Mail list logo