For your first question, wouldn't it be possible to achieve that with some
simple boolean logic? I mean, if you have a requirement to match any of the
other fields AND description2, but not if it ONLY matches description 2:
say matching x against field A, B, and description 2:
((A:x OR B:x) AND
They have probably added the logic for that server-side. Solr does not
support these type of features, but they are easy to implement.
Saving a search could be as easy as storing the selected query parameters.
Then creating an alert (or RSS feed) for that would be a process on the
server that
... could you post an actual example?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Aleksander Stensby
aleksander.sten...@integrasco.com wrote:
Hi everyone! I've posted a similar question earlier, but in a thread
related
to facets in general, so I thought I'd repost
.../mainIndex
Aleksander Stensby wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm getting some strange behavior here, and I'm wondering if I'm doing
anything wrong..
I've got an unoptimized index, and I'm trying to run the following
command:
http://server:8983/solr/update?optimize=truemaxSegments
Hi everyone! I've posted a similar question earlier, but in a thread related
to facets in general, so I thought I'd repost it here as a separate thread.
I have a faceted search that is very fast when I executed the query on a
single solr server, but is significantly slower when executed in a
Hey guys,
I'm getting some strange behavior here, and I'm wondering if I'm doing
anything wrong..
I've got an unoptimized index, and I'm trying to run the following command:
http://server:8983/solr/update?optimize=truemaxSegments=10waitFlush=false
Tried it first directly in the browser, it
A follow up question on this Hoss:
If I have a set of documents, let's say this email thread. Each email has a
unique author. All emails in the thread are indexed with threadid=33 If I
want to count the number of unique authors in this email thread, I could go
along the lines you mention at the
Forgot to add facet.mincount=1, obviously. But still, is this the only or
prefered way of doing something along these lines? Or is there a different
(better) approach?
Best regards,
Aleksander
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Aleksander Stensby
aleksander.sten...@integrasco.com wrote
, Aleksander Stensby wrote:
A follow up question on this Hoss:
If I have a set of documents, let's say this email thread. Each email has
a
unique author. All emails in the thread are indexed with threadid=33 If
I
want to count the number of unique authors in this email thread, I could
go
along
Hey,
I have a question regarding the primitive type definitions and use of those
for sorting.
I have an ID field in my index of type SortableLongField, and on my test
index I have about 2 million documents. When doing a sort=id desc and q=*:*
I'm getting out of memory (heap space)...
running the
Perfect, thanks a heap Yonik!
Cheers,
Aleks
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Aleksander Stensby
aleksander.sten...@integrasco.com wrote:
So I'm wondering if the Trie based field types are less memory expensive
Thanks for the reply Yonik!
I'm using the nightly from 2009-08-20, so its a rather fresh build. And by
comparing the schema with the one im using now I had made a mistake when
defining the field.
By examining the most recent build, i noticed that the normal date field is
defined as follows:
but will try out the new
example data once its back up again then, because even though I changed my
schema definitions, the two fields still gives back different results... :(
I'll keep you updated.
- Aleks
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Aleksander Stensby
aleksander.sten...@integrasco.com wrote
but you could use facets to do something similar as a distinct where...
lets say you filter your query on something and want to know how many
distinct categories that your results comprise.
then you can facet on the category field and count the number of facet
values that are returned, right?
but
Hello everyone,
after reading Grant's article about TrieRange capabilities on the lucid blog
I did some experimenting, but I have some trouble with the tdate type and I
was hoping that you guys could point me in the right direction.
So, basically I index a regular solr date field and use that for
15 matches
Mail list logo