/IntegratingSolr).
Regards,
Marc.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Jens Grivolla j+...@grivolla.net wrote:
On 11/30/2011 05:40 PM, Marco Martinez wrote:
For anyone interested, recently I've been using a new Solr client for
Python. It's easy and pretty well documented. If you're
Hi all,
For anyone interested, recently I've been using a new Solr client for
Python. It's easy and pretty well documented. If you're interested its site
is: *http://mysolr.redtuna.org/*
*
*
bye!
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª
its seem that the problem is QParserPlugin2 class
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2011/10/20 karan.jindal1...@rediffmail.com
hi,
while to create customized query parser plugin
Hi Luis,
Have you tried the copyField function with custom analyzers and tokenizers?
bye,
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2011/10/18 Luis Cappa Banda luisca...@gmail.com
Hello
Hi,
I would use a custom function query that uses termPositions to calculate the
order of the values in the field to accomplished your requirements.
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
Hi Luis,
As far as i know, the position increment gap only affects in some queries,
like phrase queries if you use the slop. The position incremente gap does
not affect the similarity scoring formula of lucene :
score(q,d) =
Hi,
I am developing a new query term proximity and i am using the term positions
to get the positions of each term. I want to know if there is any clues to
increase the perfomance of using term positions, in index time o in query
time, all my fields that i am applying the term positions are
Also, i develop this query via function query, i wonder if i do it via a
normal query will increase the perfomance..
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2011/7/20 Marco Martinez mmarti
You should send a commit to you embedded solr
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2011/7/20 Jianbin Dai j...@huawei.com
Hi,
I am using embedded solrj. After I add new doc to the
Hi,
I need to use the function queries operations with the score of a given
query, but only in the docset that i get from the query and i dont know if
this is possible.
Example:
q=shops in madridreturns 1 docs with a specific score for each doc
but now i need to do some stuff like
:53 AM, Marco Martinez
mmarti...@paradigmatecnologico.com wrote:
Hi,
I need to use the function queries operations with the score of a given
query, but only in the docset that i get from the query and i dont know
if
this is possible.
Example:
q=shops in madridreturns 1
de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2011/4/12 Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Marco Martinez
mmarti...@paradigmatecnologico.com wrote:
Thanks but I tried this and I saw that this work in a standard scenario
, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2011/4/13 Marco Martinez mmarti...@paradigmatecnologico.com
No, this query returns a few more documents than if a do it by lucene query
parser. I'm going to generate another query parser that send a simple term
query and see
Hi everyone,
My situation is the next, I need to sum the value of a field to the score to
the docs returned in the query, but not to all the docs, example:
q=car returns 3 docs
1-
name=car ford
marketValue=1
score=1.3
2-
name=car citroen
marketValue=2
score=1.3
3-
name=car mercedes
:marketValue
On Apr 12, 2011, at 07:11 , Marco Martinez wrote:
Hi everyone,
My situation is the next, I need to sum the value of a field to the score
to
the docs returned in the query, but not to all the docs, example:
q=car returns 3 docs
1-
name=car ford
marketValue=1
score
We need more information about the the analyzers and tokenizers of the
default field of your search
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/12/22 satya swaroop satya.yada...@gmail.com
try to copy the values (with copyfield) to a string field
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/12/22 Peter Karich peat...@yahoo.de
you should try fq=Product:Electric Guitar
You should use the tokenizer solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory in your field
type to get your terms indexed, once you have indexed the data, you dont
need to use the * in your queries that is a heavy query to solr.
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26.
You can use a boost higher for stapler to accomplished your requirement.
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/8/13 Hasnain hasn...@hotmail.com
Hi All,
My question is related to
To help you we need the description of your fields in your schema.xml and
the query that you do when you search only a single word.
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/8/12 Ma,
Hi,
I want to know if its posiible to get a higher score in a phrase query when
the matching is on the left side of the field. For example:
doc1=name:stores peter john
doc2=name:peter john stores
doc3=name:peter john something
if you do a search with name=peter john the resultset i want to get
/package.html||SpanFirstQueryhttp://search-lucene.com/c/Lucene:/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/spans/package.html%7C%7CSpanFirstQuery
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
- Original Message
From: Marco
Hi Scott,
We need more information about your request, can you put the query that you
are doing to the servers.
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/6/7 Scott Zhang
but still nothing returned.
URL:
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?shards=localhost:7574/solr/indent=trueq=marship
return numFound=7 too. And the result has nothing.
Please help.
Thanks.
Regards.
Scott
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Marco Martinez
mmarti...@paradigmatecnologico.com
Hi,
When you start the tomcat, you can specify the properties, it will be
something like this -Dsolr.solr.home=path/to/your/solr/home. For example, in
linux ./startup.sh -Dsolr.solr.home=path/to/your/solr/home
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26.
Maybe this will help you
http://snaprojects.jira.com/wiki/display/ZOIE/Zoie+Solr+Plugin
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/5/26 bbarani bbar...@gmail.com
Hi,
Sorry if I am
Hi Chris,
Thank you for your answer.
I've always undestand that if you do a commit (replication does it), a new
searcher is open, and you lose performance (queries per second) while the
caches are regenerated. I think i don't explain correctly my situation
before, with my schema i want to avoid
Hi Alexandre,
I am not totally sure about this, but the random sort field its only used to
do a random sort on your searchs, and you will to pass differents values to
have differents sorts, so this only applies in the searchs, so no value is
indexed. You will find more information here:
Hi,
This exception is fired when you don't have this field on your index, but
this comes because you have an error in your query syntax !{ex=cars}cars,
should be {*!*ex=cars}cars , whith the exclamation inside the brackets.
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida
Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/5/14 Marco Martinez mmarti...@paradigmatecnologico.com
Hi,
I want to know if there is any approach to disable caches in a specific
core from a multicore server.
My situation is the next:
I have a multicore server where the core0 will be listen
No, the equivalent for this will be:
- A: (the lazy fox) *OR* B: (the lazy fox)
- C: (the lazy fox)
Imagine the situation that you dont have in B 'the lazy fox', with the AND
you get 0 results although you have 'the lazy fox' in A and C
Marco Martínez Bautista
Hi,
I want to know if there is any approach to disable caches in a specific core
from a multicore server.
My situation is the next:
I have a multicore server where the core0 will be listen to the queries and
other core (core1) that will be replicated from a master server. Once the
replication
I don't know if this solution accomplished your requirements but you can use
fq to do the query with only foo and q when you search by more terms.
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
Hi,
You can use localsolr (http://www.gissearch.com/localsolr) that supports
sharding if you need this feature.
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/5/11 Jean-Sebastien Vachon
,
I am trying to patch for collapse component support (till now no luck)..
In mean time I would like to know the 2nd and 3rd option you mentioned
(logic in solrj)..
with regards
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Marco Martinez
mmarti...@paradigmatecnologico.com wrote:
Hi Jonty,
I
no..)
so how can I set the flag..
thank
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Marco Martinez
mmarti...@paradigmatecnologico.com wrote:
Hi,
2º solution:
Not use multiValue fields, instead use two single fields, in your example
will be:
doc1:
dept: student1
city: city1
Hi Jonty,
I think you have three possible solutions:
1. Use the collapse component with your name field for not have any
duplicates documents.
2. Create a simple logic in your index with flags, like one flag to
determine the first element of the same document (in your example you
You should specify the core in your request, like
http://localhost:8080/solr/*core0*/update?... where /solr/ is your
webapp and 'core0' is the name of the core.
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
.
Is there a command to add an xml file to a particular core, imagining we
can
have an indefinite number of cores ?
2010/5/6 Marco Martinez mmarti...@paradigmatecnologico.com
You should specify the core in your request, like
http://localhost:8080/solr/*core0*/update?... where /solr/ is your
Europa, 26. Ática 5. 3ª Planta
28224 Pozuelo de Alarcón
Tel.: 91 352 59 42
2010/4/30 Jonty Rhods jonty.rh...@gmail.com
On 4/29/10 8:50 PM, Marco Martinez wrote:
Hi Ranveer,
If you don't specify a field type in the q parameter, the search will be
done searching in your default search field
Hi Ranveer,
If you don't specify a field type in the q parameter, the search will be
done searching in your default search field defined in the solrconfig.xml,
its your default field a text_sync field?
Regards,
Marco Martínez Bautista
http://www.paradigmatecnologico.com
Avenida de Europa, 26.
Hi Ranveer,
The error in the count of the facets its caused by the tokenized field that
you are using, if you want to do facets for the whole string, use a
fieldType that doesn't strip the the field in tokens like the string field.
Regards,
Marco Martínez Bautista
Hi Marcin,
This is because when you do the replication, all the caches are rebuild
cause the index has changed, so the searchs performance decrease. You can
change your architecture to a multicore one to reduce the impact of the
replication. Using two cores, one to do the replication, and other
Hello,
You can see what happen (which analyzer are used for this field and which is
the output of the analyzers) with this search using the analysis page of the
solr default web page. I assume you are using the same analyzers and
tokenizers in indexing and searching for this field in your schema.
44 matches
Mail list logo