Don Brown wrote:
Rumor has it IDEA is working on a C# version :)
They are at least planning one, at least if you believe the IntelliJ CTO:
http://www.freeroller.net/page/gstamp/20030427
-T.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
hing is they are
> >succeeding and are getting their applications to the users faster and
> >management has noticed.
> >
> >Glenn
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Chris Gerrard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Friday, June 13,
OTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:48 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Struts can't "get its act together" - JavaPro
Glenn,
I'm continuously unimpressed by the implicit assumption that "Developer
Productivity" == "GUI construction". The blind ac
Friday, June 13, 2003 1:48 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Struts can't "get its act together" - JavaPro
Glenn,
I'm continuously unimpressed by the implicit assumption that "Developer
Productivity" == "GUI construction". The blind acceptance of this
ll be able to see it, understand it, and be able to explain it to
the business world.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Chris Gerrard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 1:48 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Struts can't "get its act together" - J
y, June 13, 2003 1:48 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Struts can't "get its act together" - JavaPro
Glenn,
I'm continuously unimpressed by the implicit assumption that "Developer
Productivity" == "GUI construction". The blind acceptance of this ho
Glenn,
I'm continuously unimpressed by the implicit assumption that "Developer
Productivity" == "GUI construction". The blind acceptance of this hoary old
chestnut has been a huge impediment to real progress in developing better
systems.
Given that the rapid construction of a UI is a good thin
right direction for Java tools.
-James
Struts Console
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
-Original Message-
From: Igor Shabalov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:15 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Struts can't "get its act together"
essage-
From: Davidson, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:34 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Struts can't "get its act together" - JavaPro
James,
Your site is most helpful, thanks. I was wondering if you had any
additional
details
CTED] Sent:
Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:34 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Struts can't "get its act together" - JavaPro
James,
Your site is most helpful, thanks. I was wondering if you had any
additional
details on potential JSF developer products and/or any idea
I have 2 words to say about the .NET stuff
"Springfield monorail"
On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 20:14 Europe/London, Davidson, Glenn
wrote:
Chris,
I tend to agree with your assessment of JavaPro but I'd like to open
this up
a little. Right now we are faced with two choices for web developme
JavaServerFaces/
-James
Struts Console
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
-Original Message-
From: Davidson, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:34 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Struts can't "get its act together" - J
Struts is MUCH more productive, and I would be glad to show you, how
using Struts with OO, you can code circles around.
(I also offer the training w/ money back- excuse the sales talk) I just
want to show you that most of my clients choose J2EE over .NET because
it is more productive and more sc
more about.
Glenn
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 3:19 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Struts can't "get its act together" - JavaPro
I'd recommend you have a look at JavaServer Face
ces:
http://www.jamesholmes.com/JavaServerFaces/
-James
Struts Console
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
-Original Message-
From: Davidson, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:15 PM
To: 'Struts Developers List'
Subject: RE: Struts can't "get its act
Chris,
I tend to agree with your assessment of JavaPro but I'd like to open this up
a little. Right now we are faced with two choices for web development .Net
or not .Net. I can over-simplify the arguments for and against .Net as the
following:
.NET
Pluses
Developer Productivity
Negatives
Vendor
16 matches
Mail list logo