Hi,
we had been giving new comers an extra hand when approaching the Sugar
community by giving them contacts they could ask for entry points and
such. I have been doing this for some time but can not keep up with it
anymore. If someone else wants to take that role he can list himself at [1].
On 08/21/2013 03:44 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/8/21 Walter Bender :
I like the Join_Developer approach, although it seems a bit overly complex.
Yes. I will try removing the buddy, keeping only the tools.
Mind that we already have the icon for the control panel using the
screw-wrench, t
On 06/20/2013 01:28 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
I agree that the technical solution we have come up with to a large
extent obviates the need for consensus around whether or not to
implement this feature as it pushes it to the user space in the from
of an activity. (Gonzalo and I have been discussing
On 06/20/2013 12:16 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On Thursday, 20 June 2013, Simon Schampijer wrote:
This thread is about the technical solving of the issue, did we agree on
making this change, really? I am not at all convinced.
The technical solution proposed here has pretty strong
This thread is about the technical solving of the issue, did we agree on
making this change, really? I am not at all convinced.
What do people think about my proposal with adding a picture/drawing per
kid that is part of the Palette then? We can see if we want to transfer
this compressed to th
On 06/16/2013 07:19 AM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
I think we should decide if changing the xo icon is a feature we _really_
want
include in sugar.
I am not sure if add too much value, but probably can add confusion,
more if is applied in all the places where the xo icons is used , like the
actual
im
On 06/17/2013 03:37 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
I like the idea of disabling the filter in this objectchooser.
On 17 June 2013 15:34, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 06/13/2013 06:35 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 13 June 2013 18:26, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 13 June 2013 18:23, Gonzalo Odiard
On 06/13/2013 06:35 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 13 June 2013 18:26, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 13 June 2013 18:23, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
That is the reason is better modify the behavior of the activity filter,
than allow any random list of mime types.
I'm not sure to understand this. You
On 06/13/2013 11:29 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 13 June 2013 11:26, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 06/13/2013 01:32 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/6/7 Daniel Narvaez :
I'm still undecided really but since it's important to make a call soon,
my
vote goes for Apache, both for sug
On 06/13/2013 01:32 AM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/6/7 Daniel Narvaez :
I'm still undecided really but since it's important to make a call soon, my
vote goes for Apache, both for sugar-web and for activities we develop.
I'm far from expert on licenses, but given Daniel Narvaez description,
I
On 06/06/2013 11:38 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
I'm not sure they really need to be on a branch btw. I've doing that to
keep master the same of upstream. But maybe fetching the upstream repo on
another remote gives everything you need.
Yes, maybe using the master branch for the changes is a bit m
On 06/06/2013 11:34 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On Thursday, 6 June 2013, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 06/06/2013 01:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
I setup a fork of webL10n. I amdified it and replaced API with the gaia
one
minus the b2g specific stuff.
https://github.com/sugarlabs
On 06/06/2013 01:17 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
I setup a fork of webL10n. I amdified it and replaced API with the gaia one
minus the b2g specific stuff.
https://github.com/sugarlabs/webL10n
I do not see any changes from you there, why do we need the for again?
Simon
___
On 06/03/2013 01:15 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hi,
It seems like things are coming together pretty nicely for a port of gtk3
sugar on Android.
* libhybris is making progress
http://mer-project.blogspot.fi/2013/05/wayland-utilizing-android-gpu-drivers.html
* Gtk3 has been ported to wayland.
T
Am 02.06.2013 um 23:52 schrieb Daniel Narvaez :
> Hello,
>
> it seems like we could increase a lot the number of potential contributors by
> making it easy to hack on web activities and libraries on Windows and OS X.
> Not many people are running Linux and installing it is not the easiest tas
Hi,
we an informal discussion we agreed on calling the activities that are
"coded in a browser-supported programming language (such as JavaScript,
combined with a browser-rendered markup language like HTML) and reliant
on a common web browser to render the application executable [1]": Web
act
On 05/31/2013 09:39 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
the build is still broken because of this issue. Can we please fix or
revert asap? Build bugs should be fixed with the highest priority because
they affects everyone, not just your activity.
Pushed a tmp-workaround to get the build going:
h
On 05/30/2013 12:00 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
The upstream bug seems to have no activity?
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690610
Right, that is why I have no clue what fix Gonzalo means. Anyhow, he
will let us know.
Simon
___
Sugar-dev
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.98.7.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Release 0.98.7 (Simon Schampijer)
* Add a binding for gconf_client_set_list (using strings) (Daniel Narvaez)
___
Sugar
quot;,
line 424, in write_file
text, attr = page.vt.get_text(is_selected, None)
AttributeError: 'Terminal' object has no attribute 'get_text'
Caused by
commit b90dac1ad2b8916b123e71b73848636f83fa9fe7
Author: Simon Schampijer
Date: Sat Nov 3 15:17:09 2012 +0100
Get back
On 05/29/2013 08:17 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Since I'm the one proposing the implementation, and I'm actually not too
keen about the idea itself, let me take a step back before I get blamed for
it forever :)
My feeling is that we should *not* implement this for 0.100 but rather
consider (very c
r
library is installed in the system for usage.
Thanks,
Simon
For hosted activities I think the right solution is loading from a web url,
but we don't even have to worry about that case until we actually have a
permission system in place.
On 29 May 2013 12:29, Simon Schampijer wrote
Hi,
we talked yesterday on irc about how to handle the deployment of the
webactivity libraries like sugar-html-graphics. We came up with three
basic ways of dealing with it. It follows a summary. Please comment,
fill in the missing items. It is an interesting item that needs
discussion and re
On 05/28/2013 01:16 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 May 2013, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
[..]
* Split the compilation, one part to compile sugar and another to compile
sugar-web,
sugar-web is more unstable, and have a lot of issues.
This would add more maintenance, buildbot etc work that
On 05/24/2013 03:49 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if anyone at all is using sugar-build on i386. I suppose
everyone has x86_64 hardware these days but maybe people are still
installing i386 distros, it's the Ubuntu default for example.
It's just that maintaing i386 buildbot slaves
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.98.8.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Release 0.98.8 (Simon Schampijer)
* Update Sucrose version for 0.98.8 (Simon Schampijer)
* use read_byte_async (Walter Bender)
* Complete port to introspection; fix problem with language
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.98.6.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Release 0.98.6 (Simon Schampijer)
* Use gettext algorithm to determine locale for activity.linfo (Walter
Bender)
* Replaced deprecated GObject methods with
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-artwork/sugar-artwork-0.98.5.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Release 0.98.5 (Simon Schampijer)
* Added function prototypes for theme_* to satisfy f19's gcc (William Orr)
* Remove black background in Browse tab pages - SL
On 05/20/2013 07:43 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 05/20/2013 05:52 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 20 May 2013 12:48, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Ok, great. Would be fantastic if '--help' would print the list of
possible
arguments.
I'd like to avoid maintaining the docs in two p
On 05/20/2013 05:52 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 20 May 2013 12:48, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Ok, great. Would be fantastic if '--help' would print the list of possible
arguments.
I'd like to avoid maintaining the docs in two places :) Though perhaps
using docker we can figure out something t
On 05/20/2013 12:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 20 May 2013 12:07, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 05/20/2013 10:40 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
I think the buildbot slave which uploads the docs hasn't yet had a
successfull build since the doc was changed, so no updates yet. I'm on it
On 05/20/2013 10:48 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 20 May 2013 10:12, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
I had a sugar-build repo before the osbuild change. I did a git pull in my
sugar-build directory and then run ./osbuild help.
I got the following:
[erikos@t61 sugar-build]$ ./osbuild --help
On 05/20/2013 10:40 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
I think the buildbot slave which uploads the docs hasn't yet had a
successfull build since the doc was changed, so no updates yet. I'm on it,
I should have probably made all these changes a bit more gradually.
Great!
Did the infra team handed out t
Hi,
I had a sugar-build repo before the osbuild change. I did a git pull in
my sugar-build directory and then run ./osbuild help.
I got the following:
[erikos@t61 sugar-build]$ ./osbuild --help
Installing virtualenv...
Done.
/home/erikos/sugar-build/build/out/sandbox/install/bin/python: can't
Hi,
the docs have been updated for the 'osbuild'-change [1]. The
documentation pointed to by our README [2] is not [3].
Do we have a new documentation url already? /me lost track
Cheers,
Simon
[1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-docs/blob/master/build.md
[2] http://sugarlabs.org/~build
On 05/19/2013 12:43 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
I tested it now. There was a couple of leftovers in sugar-html-activity
and sugar-html-template. I pushed fixes for these. I went without a review
for the sake of avoiding regressions. If anyone has comments I'm happy to
fix them now, but they was r
On 05/18/2013 07:36 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/5/18 Daniel Narvaez :
On 17 May 2013 15:13, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Simon, Manuel,
any feedback about this? I see a few possible levels
1 Everything, bugfixes included
2 Every feature patch
3 Every patch to the new html/javascript code
4 Not
On 05/19/2013 01:41 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hey,
It seems like building webkitgtk is a bit of a pain for many people. I
would like people feedback on how bad of an obstacle it really is and about
a couple of possible solutions:
1 Have buildbot generate snapshots of the base system dependencie
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar/tree/master/tests
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-build/tree/master/tests
On 17 May 2013 15:16, Simon Schampijer wrote:
How does the test coverage looks like? Human testing or automated tests?
Thanks,
Simon
On 05/17/2013 03:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez
How does the test coverage looks like? Human testing or automated tests?
Thanks,
Simon
On 05/17/2013 03:13 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Simon, Manuel,
any feedback about this? I see a few possible levels
1 Everything, bugfixes included
2 Every feature patch
3 Every patch to the new html/javas
Am 11.05.2013 um 16:45 schrieb Daniel Drake :
> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
>> https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issues/27
>>
>> We should probably decide if we want to keep using trac instead and if so
>> turn the issue tracker on github off.
>>
>> L
Hi,
with the merges from Github we do get a non ideal git history. The merge
pull requests do only add value as they show who did authorize the
merge. But they can be in another order to the actual commit.
One way to handle this would be to do a git rebase before pushing and
avoid the merge
On 05/08/2013 04:22 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
[...]
8. Daniel Narveaz reports that "the initial bits of the HTML activities
work has landed. It should now be relatively easy to start writing an
activity."
(1) You'll need the latest Sugar development environment [6].
(2) Then o
On 05/08/2013 03:02 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
== Sugar Digest ==
1. Sugar Labs has been given 8 slots for student interns for Google Summer
of Code [1]. This means we'll be able to cover a lot ground this summer: we
have some very strong proposals and a great mentoring team. The next step
is for
On 05/07/2013 01:05 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
I think is important Fedora (and other distros) have a option to run sugar
in a window in Gnome.
If not, is more difficult develop activities.
Gonzalo
I think a developer is off well in just use sugar-build for that
purpose. At least as long as we
On 05/07/2013 12:44 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 7 May 2013 10:01, Peter Robinson wrote:
Advantages of having it together is that as the sugar release changes
the changes are made to sugar the changes to sugar-runner are in lock
step so you should never get into a situation where either shoul
On 05/03/2013 02:42 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Already released MusicKeyboard with this change, and waiting confirmation
to release TamTam activities.
Gonzalo
Is that in version 7? I still hear cracking sounds when using the
keyboard. Or maybe those are other cracking sounds then th
Thanks Daniel for the writeup.
On 05/06/2013 12:35 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 6 May 2013 11:47, Simon Schampijer wrote:
"Yes sugar-runner should just work in fedora as a replacement of
sugar-emulator. It only needs to be packaged."
Why isn't it included in the sugar packa
On 05/03/2013 03:54 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
I think there are two fundamental differences:
- one-to-many: you share an item publically to all of the members of the
session, the ones that are available should be visible in one list, in the
mockup at the top left, everyone can download any of th
On 05/03/2013 02:26 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
Manuel and myself have been looking at the work-flow for the Journal share
activity these days: http://activities.sugarlabs.**
org//en-US/sugar/addon/4656<http://activities.sugarlabs.
Hi,
Manuel and myself have been looking at the work-flow for the Journal
share activity these days:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org//en-US/sugar/addon/4656
We discussed the design completely independent of possible technical
constraints we will see what we can do, and what we can not but we
On 04/25/2013 11:59 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
I wrote a quick prototype for a possible python <-> js IPC.
sugar-toolkit-gtk3 patch
https://github.com/dnarvaez/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/commit/5ba4e19732b4eec688dd73be8408c0d8e6a91299
hello-world patch
https://github.com/dnarvaez/hello-world/c
Thanks, pushed to master and 0.98 (as F19 will package 0.98 and we need
that fix there).
Simon
On 04/25/2013 02:38 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
+1 let's push this.
2013/4/25 Simon Schampijer :
On 04/25/2013 12:53 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
The patch works with the latest Pygobject
On 04/25/2013 12:53 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
The patch works with the latest Pygobject 3.8.x but as well in the 3.4.x
series.
Actually, using GLib.MAXINT32 would work as well. I will ask on #python
what the correct/better one is.
Regards,
Simon
Confirmed on #python, we should use
The patch works with the latest Pygobject 3.8.x but as well in the 3.4.x
series.
Actually, using GLib.MAXINT32 would work as well. I will ask on #python
what the correct/better one is.
Regards,
Simon
On 04/25/2013 12:45 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
From: Simon Schampijer
See pygobject
From: Simon Schampijer
See pygobject c2aa6f0d0ed4c4e60f081b106dc7a65513963fce
---
extensions/deviceicon/battery.py | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/extensions/deviceicon/battery.py b/extensions/deviceicon/battery.py
index 21dc5f3..6bf27ef 100644
--- a
On 04/19/2013 03:51 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/4/18 Simon Schampijer :
Hi Manuel,
your patch does fix the Write-Color-Palette.
Which is the Abacus-Palette, the custom one? Is Walter aware of this fix and
would remove his workaround (at least in master)?
Yes, the Abacus palette is the
great tool
for developers, may be too volatile of an environment for end users. IMHO,
we still have a significant gap in our Ubuntu support.
regards.
-walter
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
I just had another request for developing Sugar on Ubuntu. The wiki says
t
Hi,
I just had another request for developing Sugar on Ubuntu. The wiki says
to use sweets [1]. From what I have heard currently people on Ubuntu
have been using sugar-build just fine. Should we update the docs and
point devs to sugar-build?
I think that section could see some update as well
On 04/22/2013 11:40 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Time: 22 April 2013 (14:00 UTC)
Place: #sugar-meeting (freenode)
More info
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2013-April/042558.html
Minutes:
http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2013-04-22T14:04:27.html
Log:
http://
On 04/22/2013 12:24 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 04/17/2013 05:39 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Thanks Daniel. Lots of interesting points here!
[...]
3. I see this project as a way of taking us closer to Sugar (in some
sense) on Android. Can Chrome webapps work as first-class citizens on
Android
On 04/17/2013 05:39 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Thanks Daniel. Lots of interesting points here!
[...]
3. I see this project as a way of taking us closer to Sugar (in some
sense) on Android. Can Chrome webapps work as first-class citizens on
Android?
That's actually something I was thinking abou
On 04/17/2013 10:58 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
we are going to kick off the work on HTML activities for 0.100 with a
meeting.
Time: 22 April 2013 (14:00 UTC)
Place: #sugar-meeting (freenode)
It would be really useful to know how many people are interested to
contribute, so please try to
Hi Manuel,
your patch does fix the Write-Color-Palette.
Which is the Abacus-Palette, the custom one? Is Walter aware of this fix
and would remove his workaround (at least in master)?
Code looks good, please push, as well to 0.98.
Cheers,
Simon
On 04/17/2013 10:12 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrot
On 04/17/2013 07:20 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
But is WebKit so much better? For example the WebKit2 decision _seems_ to
have been made by Apple engineers without even talking to major
contributors. The gtk bits are maintained the way we would
On 04/13/2013 02:42 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 12 April 2013 23:18, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hi Lionel,
we are more or less understanding each other :) I think there are really
three possible steps
1 A WebView with an html5/javascript based sugar-toolkit
2 Support for web activities along wit
On 04/11/2013 09:52 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
I spent some time today thinking and experimenting with Chromium
integration and I have a more detailed plan to propose now.
There is an important premise to be made. In both Chromium and Firefox OS,
application's installation is very much in
On 03/27/2013 10:57 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
I have created a page in the wiki to describe the status of JournalShare
activity.
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/JournalShare
Enjoy Easter
Gonzalo
Thanks Gonzalo for the write-up!
The first thing that caught my eye was the way to defi
On 03/27/2013 11:03 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Another option is use http://dev.laptop.org/~gonzalo/nicaragua/Tuxmath-3.xo
and tuxmath packaged in fedora.
Gonzalo
Ok, the AND is important here. Would be good to write down the clear
steps to get this into a build.
The no-sound option on the l
On 03/28/2013 10:51 AM, Basanta Shrestha wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to build os for XO-1.75. I have installed fedora 14 as main OS
and installed fedora for ARM (Fedora 12) under virtual
machine. Everything including network is working from within virtual OS and
I can ping outer world as well.
I
On 03/27/2013 09:03 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 27 March 2013 16:23, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
I know all this can be replaced by a fork & pull workflow, and I'm
used to do that in github. But gitorius interface is not as good as
github, in my opinion. By the way, if we have consensus for a for
On 03/27/2013 06:58 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 27 March 2013 18:47, Simon Schampijer wrote:
* I have not allocated dates for unstable tarballs. Is it actually
worth spending time building those? Is anyone using them?
So far, Fedora has been picking them up and they made their way into the
On 03/27/2013 01:36 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
here is an initial schedule for 0.100
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.100/Roadmap
Notes:
* Still unclear if it's going to be 0.100 or 1.0. We should probably
decide after we know what the focus of the release is going to be.
That sounds go
On 03/27/2013 12:27 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
On 03/21/2013 08:06 PM, Sugar Labs Activities wrote:
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.**org/addon/4654<http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4654>
Sugar Platform:
0.98
On 03/21/2013 08:06 PM, Sugar Labs Activities wrote:
Activity Homepage:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/addon/4654
Sugar Platform:
0.98 - 0.98
Download Now:
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/downloads/file/28522/music_keyboard-6.xo
Release notes:
This activity show a piano keyboard, and in devic
On 03/26/2013 09:55 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/3/26 Daniel Narvaez :
[...]
We also had periodic design meetings guiding
features.
I wonder if that kind of discussion could be had on the mailing list
rather than in meetings. It's problematic to find a time that works
for everyone and ma
Ahh, ok. I came across this then as well and made the Sugar code more
solid against it [1]. Defensive programming can nearly never hurt.
Simon
[1]
http://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline/commit/5b2c88b621d684d8631655fb5fab03fc70fbd2bf
On 03/26/2013 04:33 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
Replying
On 03/26/2013 01:20 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
we are pretty late in the cycle for the next release without much
development having been landed on the master branch. At this point I
think we need to consider what our options are. If w
On 03/26/2013 12:21 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
I would like to applaud the discussion.
Yes, I think we are blocking too much, in regards to stuff that is out
of bugfixing, and polishing the gtk3 port. This is indeed not good
for the community.
When I started in this project, my patches receive
On 03/26/2013 11:13 AM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
On 26 March 2013 10:53, Simon Schampijer wrote:
That is bad of course. Could have been several reasons. Maybe the decoupling
of patches and the bug tracker, maybe just felt of the table... Sometimes a
ping is valid option. But yes, the easiest area
On 03/25/2013 09:32 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Forgot to reply all...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Narvaez
Date: 25 March 2013 21:12
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Proposal on how to speed up patch reviews
To: Simon Schampijer
On 25 March 2013 12:37, Simon Schampijer
On 03/25/2013 01:27 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
While I agree in theory with all this,
we can improve our actual situation if we look at our resources,
time and people.
* Time: we don't have a schedule, then feature discussion can't start.
We can improve if we have a clear path and start to define
On 03/25/2013 12:46 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hey Daniel,
thanks for the write-up!
It is true that patch review, especially of non-bugfix patches is slow and
can be sometimes frustrating for all parties involved, the reviewer, the
Hey Daniel,
thanks for the write-up!
It is true that patch review, especially of non-bugfix patches is slow
and can be sometimes frustrating for all parties involved, the reviewer,
the maintainer and the submitter.
To improve that situation, I think we have to put some lights on all
those r
For this Feature it would be good to have a look at the exact use case that
originated this feature request. Activity Central worked on it, maybe they can
give us details about the request from their client to know which exact case we
are trying to solve.
Simon
Am 15.03.2013 um 04:29 schrieb T
Hey Ajay,
thanks for the new patch, looks like this solves the previous issues we
have been seeing there.
On 03/06/2013 01:30 PM, Ajay Garg wrote:
The solution has been build upon the "no-caching" solution provided by erikos at
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/4419#comment:4
Theerafter, the
On 02/21/2013 04:35 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
2013/2/21 Walter Bender :
I've had to make a similar change in my activities as well. (I guess I
missed the patch go by when self._shared_activity became
self.shared_actvity) There is a also a method,
self.get_shared_activity(), which might be bett
Pushed to master after review from Manuel.
158f4384d1f3423a6c2063723434f4f331796f81
Simon
On 02/19/2013 10:16 AM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
From: Simon Schampijer
This patch adds the tooltip 'Favorite entries' to the favorite filter
button in the Journal toolbar. The b
Hi Ajay,
there are some questions open from the last time this feature was
submitted for review:
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2012-August/038917.html
"There are two differences to the GNOME 3 design. There is a check box
in the 'Manual' option that says 'Use authentication'
Hi,
when talking about the 'grab watch hands' feature [1] in the Clock
activity I came across the desire to show the written clock information
(e.g. ten minutes to 10 am) in different languages.
To make that easily manageable without reloading translations on
run-time I was wondering if ther
From: Simon Schampijer
This patch adds the tooltip 'Favorite entries' to the favorite filter
button in the Journal toolbar. The button is a ToggleToolButton and
with the recent change in the toolkit-gtk3
63b8e87b1a99a854e9adbb1579b1e05244d2dc4
we do hide the tooltip when the button
Hi Walter and Raul,
this looks like a Feature scope work to me, I would like to see a
Feature discussion about this first. If you fill out the form [1] it
will help to discuss the separate points.
Thanks,
Simon
[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Policy
On 02/19/2013 04:13 AM, Wa
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.98.1.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Release 0.98.1 (Simon Schampijer)
* ToggleToolbutton: do hide the tooltip when clicked or touched (Simon
Schampijer
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/sugar-toolkit-gtk3-0.98.5.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Release 0.98.5 (Simon Schampijer)
* ToggleToolbutton: do hide the tooltip when clicked or touched (Simon
Schampijer)
* Commit from Sugar Labs: Translation
== Source ==
http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.98.4.tar.bz2
== News ==
* Release 0.98.4 (Simon Schampijer)
* Journal sorting button: hide/show on click or touch (Simon Schampijer)
* AboutComputer: adjust copyright text to reflect the year 2013 (Simon
On 02/11/2013 04:18 PM, badday wrote:
Hi there,
first of all, this is my first post to this mailing list, so a warm
welcome to everybody.
I am currently working in an NGO in India and want to use Sugar as a
tool of education. Therefore I bought a low-cost tablet, rooted it and
installed Fedora
On 02/01/2013 02:08 PM, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
With technologies like HTML5 and EPUB3, the lines between a book and
a activity start to blur. (EPUB2 prohibited the use of javascript, but is
allowed in EPUB3)
A nice example of a book with dynamic content is
http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-1-ve
On 01/28/2013 07:16 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
From: Daniel Narvaez
I'm not sure how it works with GNU ld, but it breaks with ld
gold and it's clearly wrong anyway.
---
configure.ac | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index cb221a8
On 01/28/2013 06:37 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hey Daniel,
thanks for the writeup!
On 01/26/2013 03:27 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
the desire to be able to write activities using html has been expressed
several
times by
Hey Daniel,
thanks for the writeup!
On 01/26/2013 03:27 PM, Daniel Narvaez wrote:
Hello,
the desire to be able to write activities using html has been expressed several
times by developers. We have seen several approaches but there is not much
support for it in the core platform yet.
I and Si
1 - 100 of 2348 matches
Mail list logo
