Dear talk-co@openstreetmap.org,
Luis Miguel Sánchez Zoque (who claims to know you) invited you to join
Verify.Wiki.
To accept an invitation, please follow this link to create an account:
I would use the 'Open Data from official sources' to confirm the 'on the
ground' public signage. A conflict should lead to further
investigation/thought.
On 25-Oct-16 10:45 AM, john whelan wrote:
A very interesting comment, considering the lengths we seem to go to
to avoid importing Open
As I contribute to our wiki pages, I find it useful in certain circumstances to
use this syntax:
to display (instead of mapnik/Standard) a bicycle-oriented map (Cycle Map
layer, note "layer=cycle" above). See, for example,
http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/South_Bay_(SF),_California for Silicon
pour moi c'est très bien
Le 24 octobre 2016 à 20:38, pepilepi...@ovh.fr a écrit
:
> Le 24/10/2016 à 00:55, Jérôme Amagat a écrit :
>
> [...]
> Après avoir fait ton choix tu peux aussi ajouter quelque chose sur la page
> de discussion de office= https://wiki.openstreetmap.
>
A very interesting comment, considering the lengths we seem to go to to
avoid importing Open Data from official sources.
Cheerio John
On 24 Oct 2016 7:35 pm, "Pine W" wrote:
> Just a comment that I'd be wary of "No hunting", "Hunting allowed", or
> "Private property", or
Just a comment that I'd be wary of "No hunting", "Hunting allowed", or
"Private property", or other signs on the ground that can actually be
placed by anyone, whether or not they are legal. A problem that I've
encountered more than once is a private property owner putting out what
appeared to me
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 24 ott 2016, alle ore 20:22, yvecai ha scritto:
>
> Michal,
> You're half right IMO. I don't see such problems if
> 1) tagging is made by hunters
> 2) mapping is made by hunters
I'm not a hunter, but I have encountered a lot of "hunting
On 2016-10-24 17:26, Sus Verhoeven
wrote:
2016-10-24 0:55 GMT+02:00 André
Pirard :
On
2016-10-23 20:54, Guy Vanvuchelen wrote:
Sorry!, spam
El lun., 24 oct. 2016 a las 17:20, Carlos Felipe Castillo
() escribió:
> Dear OpenStreetMap Colombia,
>
> Carlos Felipe Castillo (who claims to know you) invited you to join
> Verify.Wiki.
> To accept an invitation, please follow this link to create an
I believe Bjenk was kidding when stating he'd be buying a coffee.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:16 PM, john whelan wrote:
> Both the City of Ottawa and the Canadian Federal Government have rules in
> place about bribery and corruption. Buying a civil servant a coffee these
>
Both the City of Ottawa and the Canadian Federal Government have rules in
place about bribery and corruption. Buying a civil servant a coffee these
days is one of the forbidden activities. I do trust you are not suggesting
that illegal methods were used when the data was obtained.
The use of
Bjenk(STATS Can) is communicating/pushing with the the city of Ottawa, even
may resolve to offering coffee bribes to be able to host the shared file on
open.canada.ca. He's been relentless in his effort to move the project
forward, but as most Canadian gouvernment entities it moves at a snails
On 25-Oct-16 01:01 AM, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
I, for one, think that hunting areas don't really belong to OSM. Or at
least benefits are outweighed by problems.
OSM was initially aimed at mapping streets.
Do not limit the development of OSM in any direction! IF someone wants to give
an
Por lo que he visto el trazado de los cauces es parecido en ambas
versiones. A parte, cada una de las fuentes tiene sus pros y sus contras:
GOBIERNO VASCO
A favor:
- Tiene dibujadas mas cabeceras de arroyos.
- Mas variedad de nombres: en un solo arroyo puede recoger hasta tres
nombres diferentes.
Thanks John
On 24 Oct 2016 4:54 pm, "Frederik Ramm" wrote:
> John,
>
>the bulk of the revert has run its course, I'm just sifting through
> the remaining incomplete things for a little fixup here and there. I
> think normal mapping should be safe now ;)
>
> Bye
>
Normalement, chaque exploitant/propriétaire de dispositifs publicitaires
doit déclarer annuellement ses dispositifs auprès de la commune ou
l'EPCI dans lequel ils se trouvent, et la TLPE (Taxe Locale sur la
Publicité Extérieure, taxe facultative) est calculée sur cette base
déclarative. La
John,
the bulk of the revert has run its course, I'm just sifting through
the remaining incomplete things for a little fixup here and there. I
think normal mapping should be safe now ;)
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"
Hola.
Estoy de acuerdo en lo de aunar esfuerzos pero quizás no en lo de utilizar
una sola fuente, principalmente porque alomejor las fuentes más locales,
entiéndase autonomías, pueden tener mejor calidad e información más valiosa
y/o certera.
Habrá que comparar, en este tema de la hidrografía,
Santiago, yo diría que el buen trabajo lo estás haciendo tú.
Mi idea era importar los cursos de agua de Gipuzkoa pero viendo que Matías
y tú estais trabajando en la importación de los mismos datos del IGN me he
convencido de que es mas provechoso aunar esfuerzos y utilizar una sola
fuente. Al
a parte aver appena scoperto che esistono 2 diversi tag ufficiali ed entrambi
in uso praticamente con lo stesso significato:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial:type
boh
fino ad oggi io ho utilizzato il primo cioè memorial per
à écrire ça, tu méconnais le travail
des architectes.
Leur travail ne s’arrête certainement pas à la production de jolis
plans...
Ils font presque tous de la coordination de chantier.
C'est en général les responsables du déroulé des chantiers.
On
On 2016-10-24 4:08 PM, James wrote:
I've updated the file(I can't delete it without and admin)
thanks James, looks good.
-jeff
--
Jeff McKenna
President Emeritus, OSGeo Foundation
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Jeff_McKenna
___
Talk-ca
I've updated the file(I can't delete it without and admin)
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> On 2016-10-24 3:50 PM, James wrote:
>
>> It was more to prove that the emails are Trusted sources and not made
>> up. The emails are public already
Judging by
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck_repair/history#map=10/45.2996/-75.6981
There hasn't been activity in 24hrs... Frederik Ramm said he'd update us.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:56 PM, john whelan wrote:
> Thanks John
>
>
On 2016-10-24 3:50 PM, James wrote:
It was more to prove that the emails are Trusted sources and not made
up. The emails are public already in the contact section of the import
wiki.If I hide emails/domains then I'm obfuscating the process. These
emails are public emails @ottawa.ca
Thanks John
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
It was more to prove that the emails are Trusted sources and not made up.
The emails are public already in the contact section of the import wiki.If
I hide emails/domains then I'm obfuscating the process. These emails are
public emails @ottawa.ca and @canada.ca. No personal emails are visible
On
On 2016-10-24 3:28 PM, James wrote:
I've received a forwarded email from Bjenk that may settle the debate
where the data originates from (I'd forward it to the list, but it would
be lost in the mail archive and detach the main thread(:
Le 24/10/2016 à 00:55, Jérôme Amagat a
écrit :
[...]
Après avoir fait ton choix tu peux aussi ajouter quelque chose
sur la page de discussion de office= https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:office
en expliquant un
You asked:
Could you please clarify what the alleged source of the building data to
be imported is?
I clarified. I did not change the subject. The source of the data is the
city of Ottawa
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Christoph Hormann
wrote:
> On Monday 24 October
As for general availability of the files I have this email chain(which was
documented that there was bureaucracy behind the scenes):
*From:* Perkins, Stephen M [mailto:stephen.perk...@ottawa.ca]
*Sent:* July-26-16 4:15 PM
*To:* Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN)
*Cc:* Cross,
Christoph,
At the moment the Ottawa building footprint dataset is not on any official
portal other then being shared on a public Amazon S3 Bucket.
You can download the file here:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/statscan/ottawa-buildings.geojson
The data doesn't contain any specific tags, only the
Bonjour,
Pour cartographier les arrêts de bus (qui sont l'un de mes TOCs), je me
suis faite une petite webapp. Elle est accessible à cette adresse :
https://microcosm.5apps.com/poi.html?poi_type=bus_stop#18/48.84885/2.37222
All bugs included !
Elle permet de modifier le nom des arrêts
Hola,
Estoy preparando la importación manual de los lugares de culto de
Madrid. El Ayto. los ha separado en 2 conjuntos de datos: templos
católicos y templos no-católicos.
En los no-católicos, he añadido las etiquetas "religion" y
"denomination" basándome en el nombre.
Aquí hay más detalles de
Michal,
You're half right IMO. I don't see such problems if
1) tagging is made by hunters
2) mapping is made by hunters
Yves
On 24.10.2016 16:01, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
I, for one, think that hunting areas don't really belong to OSM. Or at
least benefits are outweighed by problems. Firstly
As stated, multiple times on this list already: the city of Ottawa gave
data to Statistics Canada. Statistics Canada gave us (amazon cloud link)
data, which is just building outlines.
In case you are in doubt this project is actually happening or not (and I
am just making the whole thing up):
Enhorabuena, buen trabajo.
Lo ideal es una carta de autorización expresa, pero creo que con dejar
claro que cumplimos con su cláusula de atribución y que los datos en OSM
tienen licencia ODbL es suficiente.
Y por si acaso, una vez tengas la aprobación de esta lista para la
primera importación,
Hola,
Copiando el método de los usuarios experimentados me he permitido pedir
permiso al Gobierno Vasco para el uso en OSM de los datos abiertos
disponibles en el portal geoEuskadi [1].
Han dado su aprobación [2] y lo he informado en la wiki de Euskadi [3].
Antes de añadirlo a la lista de
welcome Severin,
Mwen kontan li mesaj s malgre mwen te deja
okouran de prezans ou sou Ayiti...
Mwen espere ke tout kontribite OSM pral mete tet ansanm pou pwofite de
fomasyon Severin pote pou nou ki pral grandi nou teknikman nan OSM ak lot
aktivite ki konekte ak
Seems like they may have dumped it on their servers to the public:
http://data.ottawa.ca/dataset/cad-topographic-data
This would explain why some buildings are outdated:
*Update Frequency: Never*as compared to:
http://data.ottawa.ca/dataset/addresspoints
*Update Frequency: Weekly*
On Mon, Oct
On 2016-10-24 08:04 AM, James wrote:
> I've updated the documentation and incorporated Scruss's findings on the
> build source data:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:Ontario:Ottawa/Import/TopographicMap
Cool! I was hoping to be able to show that the geojson data that you
were given
So to obtain all data for building outlines(from source) (from what scruss
has provided) we would need to convert all tiles of the building outline
and join them together as it clips on edge of tile:
http://i66.tinypic.com/2i1ffpx.png
As for additional information from the DWG I have not see any
Il 24/10/2016 18:18, Federico Cortese ha scritto:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Andrea Solari wrote:
>>
>> nel file pdf del programma scaricabile qui
>> http://www.festivalscienza.it/site/home/programma.html
>>
>> alla pagina 60 nella mappa in fondo a sx appare
Il 24/10/2016 18:12, Andrea Solari ha scritto:
nel file pdf del programma scaricabile qui
http://www.festivalscienza.it/site/home/programma.html
alla pagina 60 nella mappa in fondo a sx appare openstreetmap
contributors www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
Ciao Andrea,
sugli stampati è ok.
Il
Il 24/10/2016 18:12, Andrea Solari ha scritto:
nel file pdf del programma scaricabile qui
http://www.festivalscienza.it/site/home/programma.html
alla pagina 60 nella mappa in fondo a sx appare openstreetmap
contributors www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
Ciao Andrea,
sugli stampati è ok.
Il
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Andrea Solari wrote:
>
> nel file pdf del programma scaricabile qui
> http://www.festivalscienza.it/site/home/programma.html
>
> alla pagina 60 nella mappa in fondo a sx appare openstreetmap
> contributors www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
>
Il 24/10/2016 17:24, Alessandro ha scritto:
> Il 24/10/2016 16:28, Luca Delucchi ha scritto:
>> 2016-10-24 15:58 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Palmas
>> :
>
>>
>> belin quest'anno non riesco a attaccare adesivi sui cartelloni
>>
>>> Ora vedremo di passare anche ad
堀田さん
坂ノ下@LILOです。
転送ありがとうございます。また機会があればよろしくお願いします。
それでは。
On 2016年10月24日 06:48, HOTTA Sadamichi wrote:
堀田 貞通@滋賀LUGです。
せっかくの地元開催ですので滋賀LUG-Mlに[shigalug-ml 003650]にて転送しました。
私は仕事の都合上参加できませんが。
--
/*
* K.Sakanoshita (http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~saka/)
* (Phone) barsa...@gmail.com / (PC)
I've previously documented the Lower Mainland ones here as well:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:British_Columbia:Vancouver#GIS_sources_by_city
Maybe some of this should be moved to your table.
Note the OGL-BC which many of these cities are based on seems to have some
potential problems
I've been looking for open data portals for potential future import into
OpenStreetMap(why duplicate efforts right?)
I've documented the one's I've found here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada#Open_Data
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Il Lunedì 24 Ottobre 2016 16:06, demon.box ha scritto:
>cioè, per esempio (sparo una ipotesi) da quota 1600m in su è sempre
>natural=fell e al di sotto invece è landuse=meadow
>che dite? come vi regolate voi?
In linea di massimo metto meadow se è un terreno coltivato ad
Il 24/10/2016 16:28, Luca Delucchi ha scritto:
2016-10-24 15:58 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Palmas :
belin quest'anno non riesco a attaccare adesivi sui cartelloni
Ora vedremo di passare anche ad avvertimenti ufficiali.
e sarebbe anche il caso che facessero una
On 2016-10-24, 10:04 GMT, Marián Kyral wrote:
> Proč se ho nezeptáš pod nějakým changesetem? Pochybuji, že čte @talk-cz.
Zeptám, máš pravdu.
> A nevím, čemu říkáš tuny. Moc toho není. Nevím jak moc přesné ty informace
> jsou v porovnáním se skutečností, ale dle jeho historie editací bych to
>
2016-10-24 15:58 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Palmas :
>
> Cara comunità, che ne direste di mandare qualche tweet di protesta? Mi
> raccomando rimanete nella civiltà ed educazione ma vediamo di far sapere in
> giro che non possono continuare a prenderci per il naso.
>
Les données LTPE des 8 villes françaises sont un plus, mais demandent à
être retravaillées comme l'indique la page. La précision "métrique" peut
aussi être problématique dans OSM où il faudra recaler les objets par
endroit pour qu'ils ne se retrouvent pas au milieu des polygones de
batiments ou du
come da oggetto mi ritrovo nell'indecisione sull'utilizzo dei 2 tag:
landuse=meadow oppure natural=fell
a quote basse ci sta sicuramente landuse=meadow ma a quote più alte dove in
pratica non crescono alberi e piante ma c'è solo erba, va bene natural=fell
la mia domanda però è (e la rivolgo
I, for one, think that hunting areas don't really belong to OSM. Or at
least benefits are outweighed by problems. Firstly they may or may not
be associated with OSM features. In the latter case, there's no
guarantee that someone who edits a forest would understand it and not
merge it with other
Ahimè, per il TERZO anno consecutivo, il Festival della Scienza inonda
Genova di queste mappe di circa 1 metro per 1 metro e non le attribuisce.
L'anno scorso si erano scusati e almeno avevano attribuito le mappe nel
programma cartaceo. Quest'anno le mappe nel programma sono sempre OK ma
quelle
On 2016-10-24 05:45 AM, Jørgen Elgaard Larsen wrote:
Thomas Andersen skrev:
Taginfo siger, at der er 4 tilfælde af fishing=put_and_take.
Eftersom det begreb svjv. kun bruges i Danmark og Sverige, er det nok
ikke den bedste værdi for tagget.
Jeg kan se, at det i alle 4 tilfælde er mig, der
2016-10-20 14:20 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral :
>
...
>
> Jo. Chci to hlavně pro chybějící rozcestníky a poteciálně i pro nějakou
> desktopovou aplikaci pro hromadné nahrávání. Jen jsem narážel na to, že tak
> jak to máš teď (Phase1, Phase2) a do toho ten perl taky generuje html
>
Bonjour,
Dans la froideur de l'automne, qui est dispo ce jeudi à 19h30 pour se
rencontrer?
Nous nous rencontrons jeudi 27 septembre 2016 à partir de 19h30. Les locaux
peuvent être ouverts un peu avant je pense.
C'est ici: FPH, Fondation Charles-Léopold Mayer pour le Progrès de l'Homme
38 rue
I've updated the documentation and incorporated Scruss's findings on the
build source data:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:Ontario:Ottawa/Import/TopographicMap
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Begin Daniel wrote:
> Well, only very large buildings can be found as
On 19 October 2016 at 10:42, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
wrote:
> The OSM data for
> http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/postcodes/osm-errors.html comes from
> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/ and it's currently the latest
> available. At the moment, the updates are
Tak Ole og Jørgen
Vi prøver at se på det, og vil prøve med din løsning Jørgen. Det kan være
vi vender tilbage, hvis vi får problemer med tags :)
-Thomas
2016-10-24 11:45 GMT+02:00 Jørgen Elgaard Larsen :
> Thomas Andersen skrev:
>
>> Så hvad er den bedste fremgangsmåde, er det
Proč se ho nezeptáš pod nějakým changesetem? Pochybuji, že čte @talk-cz.
A nevím, čemu říkáš tuny. Moc toho není. Nevím jak moc přesné ty informace
jsou v porovnáním se skutečností, ale dle jeho historie editací bych to
viděl, že v Praze asi byl a tyhle informace si poznamenal. Možná v Osmand.
Thomas Andersen skrev:
Så hvad er den bedste fremgangsmåde, er det at skrive put and take i
navnet, og så lave et ekstra navn med søens navn? Eller skulle man
oprette en tag med put and take?
Det er i hvert fald forkert (og ubrugeligt for en app) at putte det i
navnet. Medmindre søen rent
Dobrý den,
mohl bych poprosit o informaci od Francois555, kde bere ty tuny
informací, které teď pumpuje do OSM v Praze ...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Francois555/history ? Všechny
jsou určitě z public domain zdrojů, že?
Hezký den,
Matěj
--
https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber:
24. oktober 2016 kl. 10.54 skrev Thomas Andersen
:
> Så hvad er den bedste fremgangsmåde, er det at skrive put and take i navnet,
> og så lave et ekstra navn med søens navn? Eller skulle man oprette en tag
> med put and take?
Helt klart et tag på en eller anden
Kære alle
Jeg skal hjælpe nogle venner med at digitalisere put-and-take søer i
Danmark til en fiskeri App. I den forbindelse vil jeg høre jer om den
bedste måde at gøre det på (så det bliver gjort rigtigt).
Såvidt jeg kan se at der ikke er noget tag for put-and-take søerne, i
stedet har man
Bonjour,
Bravo pour cette démarche d'ouverture. Est-ce prévu d'étendre à d'autres
villes (Rennes par exemple) ?
Cordialement,
PanierAvide.
Le 24/10/2016 à 10:14, Pierre Touzard a écrit :
Bonjour à tous,
Ca y est, c'est "officiellement" diffusé !
*http://www.sogefi-sig.com/ressources/*
Bonjour à tous,
Ca y est, c'est "officiellement" diffusé !
*http://www.sogefi-sig.com/ressources/*
sur la page, sélectionner l'onglet "Données OpenStreetMap TLPE"
Pierre T.
--
View this message in context:
2016-10-23 14:40 GMT+02:00 Simon Poole :
> Yes, but the point is that we don't actually give any guidance as to what
> we would consider sufficient notice if a link is not possible (as in your
> typical book or film) and we should add some text as to what we are happy
> with (I
sent from a phone
> Il giorno 23 ott 2016, alle ore 18:16, Lorenzo Beba Beltrami
> ha scritto:
>
> frase "© OpenStreetMap contributors"!!!
sulla lista internazionale ci stanno discutendo per un attribuzione così,
perché la licenza in realtà chiede anche di dire
Le 24/10/2016 à 00:55, Jérôme Amagat a écrit :
> Si il fallait que je choisisse :
> je dirais que craft= ça correspond pas, pour moi c'est l'artisanat
> donc fabriqué quelque choser de ses mains donc ça va pas dans ce cas
> c'est plutôt office=
+1
> Si on regarde la page office= sur le wiki ce
My reading of https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright is that, under the
current terms, printing the link to that page in addition to printing “©
OpenStreetMap contributors” would be sufficient. However, I do wonder
whether a credit like "“© OpenStreetMap contributors, licensed under
75 matches
Mail list logo