what's that mean? (IMAP question)

2004-01-31 Thread Jurgen Haug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo can someone tell me what all that means? What does the 1<*> stand for, and the 9<*> ??? and on whichever folder I click, the message pane remains empty, as if there are no messages at all! and apart from that, I just see that the Template att

access violations

2004-01-31 Thread Mogens Holst
I have not been able to use TheBat since beta 45 due to constant access violations or abrupt program terminations. It has taken me three days to reach the point where I could turn off the automatic checking of mailboxes at startup, and I don't have the time for another week to do systems work,

Re: The Bat! v2.03 Beta/50 is now available

2004-01-31 Thread Johannes Posel
Hi there Gary, Going back 00:04 31.01.2004... P>> 2. Issues with sending IMAP messages (aren't sent/kept in Outbox) > There is no outbox in the IMAP protocol per se, but if I do an shift F2, it The server admin can set upe, depending on the IMAP server software, a special folder that will behav

AV in HTML editor in Beta/50

2004-01-31 Thread Prezes
Hello, This bug was introduced in Beta/47. I reported this bug, but my report was bad and now I wrote proper report how to make this bug: Create new message, before entering something change to "HTML/Plain text". Next write subject and body of message. Then select ALL body of this messa

Re: AV in HTML editor in Beta/50

2004-01-31 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Saturday, January 31, 2004, Prezes wrote: > This bug was introduced in Beta/47. I reported this bug, but my > report was bad and now I wrote proper report how to make this bug: > Create new message, before entering something change to "HTML/Plain > text". Next write subject and

Re: The Bat! v2.03 Beta/50 is now available

2004-01-31 Thread Thomas Woelk
* Stefan Tanurkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MS>> 1. Question: Will the (international) language file be updated? > It's being updated in parallel, AFAIK Yes. Stefan, I'm one of the translators. We have reported a lot of bugs, wishes and "help cries". *PLEASE* take a look at the buqtracker! A

Re: AV in HTML editor in Beta/50

2004-01-31 Thread Prezes
Hello, Saturday, January 31, 2004, 3:28:34 PM, you wrote: MM> not confirmed, no AV here after many tests. Please look at attachement... -- Best regards, Prezes mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/50, Windows XP 5.1, Build 2600, Service Pack 1<>_

Re[2]: The Bat! v2.03 Beta/50 is now available

2004-01-31 Thread Gary
Hi Ken, On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 02:55:08 -0600 UTC (1/31/2004, 2:55 AM -0600 UTC my time), ken green wrote: >> Nice job with the APPEND function of IMAP... this very important feature >> works very well now.. thanks!!! k> What is the APPEND function of IMAP? IMAP does not use a "copy or move" com

Re: AV in HTML editor in Beta/50

2004-01-31 Thread Mogens Holst
Prezes wrote: Hello, This bug was introduced in Beta/47. I reported this bug, but my report was bad and now I wrote proper report how to make this bug: Create new message, before entering something change to "HTML/Plain text". Next write subject and body of message. Then select ALL body of t

Re[2]: The Bat! v2.03 Beta/50 is now available

2004-01-31 Thread Gary
Hi Johannes, On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:12:34 +0100 UTC (1/31/2004, 8:12 AM -0600 UTC my time), Johannes Posel wrote: >> There is no outbox in the IMAP protocol per se, but if I do an shift F2, it J> The server admin can set upe, depending on the IMAP server software, a J> special folder that will b

Re: AV in HTML editor in Beta/50

2004-01-31 Thread David van Zuijlekom
Hello Prezes, On Saturday, January 31, 2004 at 15:22:13 +0100, you wrote: ... > Create new message, before entering something change to "HTML/Plain > text". Next write subject and body of message. Then select ALL body > of this message and press . Nothing is done. Then press >- there is

Address Book Reply Template Not Working

2004-01-31 Thread Richard Newman
Hello Batpeople, Address specific reply templates do not seem to be working in Beta/50. Other specific templates established in the address book, seem to be OK as far as I can tell. -- Best regards, Richard Richard Newman

[2.03 Beta/50] Reply templates address book not working anymore

2004-01-31 Thread David van Zuijlekom
Hello Batlisters, With Beta/50 my reply templates from the address book don't work anymore. For instance I have a special reply template for the tbbeta list. But when I reply to a message from this list, TB! uses the account default template. Can anybody confirm? -- Best regards, David ** The

Re: [2.03 Beta/50] Reply templates address book not working anymore

2004-01-31 Thread Allie Martin
David Van Zuijlekom, [DVZ] wrote: DVZ> With Beta/50 my reply templates from the address book don't work DVZ> anymore. For instance I have a special reply template for the DVZ> tbbeta list. But when I reply to a message from this list, TB! uses DVZ> the account default template. DVZ> Can anybody c

Re: what's that mean? (IMAP question)

2004-01-31 Thread Allie Martin
Jurgen Haug, [JH] wrote: JH> can someone tell me what all that means? JH> What does the 1<*> stand for, and the 9<*> ??? I'm not sure exactly. However, I see that sort of thing come up when a syn operation has been done, but the folders cache hasn't been updated. So, it represents the count on t

RE: Reply templates address book not working anymore

2004-01-31 Thread Jurgen Haug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David, Saturday, January 31, 2004, 3:58:07 PM, you wrote: > With Beta/50 my reply templates from the address book don't work > anymore. For instance I have a special reply template for the tbbeta > list. But when I reply to a message from this

Re: [2.03 Beta/50] Reply templates address book not working anymore

2004-01-31 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hallo TBBETA Martin! Am Samstag, 31. Januar 2004 um 16:04:43 schrieben Sie: > Yes, it's been discussed in the thread titled '[2.03 Beta/50] Unexpected > change in templates priority', and the bug has been already fixed. And when we are at it: It's not just reply templates, but all of them. I had