-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo
can someone tell me what all that means?
What does the 1<*> stand for, and the 9<*> ???
and on whichever folder I click, the message pane remains empty, as if there are no
messages at all!
and apart from that, I just see that the Template att
I have not been able to use TheBat since beta 45 due to constant access
violations or abrupt program terminations. It has taken me three days to
reach the point where I could turn off the automatic checking of
mailboxes at startup, and I don't have the time for another week to do
systems work,
Hi there Gary,
Going back 00:04 31.01.2004...
P>> 2. Issues with sending IMAP messages (aren't sent/kept in Outbox)
> There is no outbox in the IMAP protocol per se, but if I do an shift F2, it
The server admin can set upe, depending on the IMAP server software, a
special folder that will behav
Hello,
This bug was introduced in Beta/47. I reported this bug, but my
report was bad and now I wrote proper report how to make this bug:
Create new message, before entering something change to "HTML/Plain
text". Next write subject and body of message. Then select ALL body
of this messa
Hello all,
Saturday, January 31, 2004, Prezes wrote:
> This bug was introduced in Beta/47. I reported this bug, but my
> report was bad and now I wrote proper report how to make this bug:
> Create new message, before entering something change to "HTML/Plain
> text". Next write subject and
* Stefan Tanurkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MS>> 1. Question: Will the (international) language file be updated?
> It's being updated in parallel, AFAIK
Yes.
Stefan, I'm one of the translators. We have reported a lot of bugs,
wishes and "help cries". *PLEASE* take a look at the buqtracker!
A
Hello,
Saturday, January 31, 2004, 3:28:34 PM, you wrote:
MM> not confirmed, no AV here after many tests.
Please look at attachement...
--
Best regards,
Prezes mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/50, Windows XP 5.1, Build 2600, Service Pack 1<>_
Hi Ken,
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 02:55:08 -0600 UTC (1/31/2004, 2:55 AM -0600 UTC my
time), ken green wrote:
>> Nice job with the APPEND function of IMAP... this very important feature
>> works very well now.. thanks!!!
k> What is the APPEND function of IMAP?
IMAP does not use a "copy or move" com
Prezes wrote:
Hello,
This bug was introduced in Beta/47. I reported this bug, but my
report was bad and now I wrote proper report how to make this bug:
Create new message, before entering something change to "HTML/Plain
text". Next write subject and body of message. Then select ALL body
of t
Hi Johannes,
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 15:12:34 +0100 UTC (1/31/2004, 8:12 AM -0600 UTC my
time), Johannes Posel wrote:
>> There is no outbox in the IMAP protocol per se, but if I do an shift F2, it
J> The server admin can set upe, depending on the IMAP server software, a
J> special folder that will b
Hello Prezes,
On Saturday, January 31, 2004 at 15:22:13 +0100, you wrote:
...
> Create new message, before entering something change to "HTML/Plain
> text". Next write subject and body of message. Then select ALL body
> of this message and press . Nothing is done. Then press
>- there is
Hello Batpeople,
Address specific reply templates do not seem to be working in Beta/50.
Other specific templates established in the address book, seem to be
OK as far as I can tell.
--
Best regards,
Richard
Richard Newman
Hello Batlisters,
With Beta/50 my reply templates from the address book don't work
anymore. For instance I have a special reply template for the tbbeta
list. But when I reply to a message from this list, TB! uses the
account default template.
Can anybody confirm?
--
Best regards,
David
** The
David Van Zuijlekom, [DVZ] wrote:
DVZ> With Beta/50 my reply templates from the address book don't work
DVZ> anymore. For instance I have a special reply template for the
DVZ> tbbeta list. But when I reply to a message from this list, TB! uses
DVZ> the account default template.
DVZ> Can anybody c
Jurgen Haug, [JH] wrote:
JH> can someone tell me what all that means?
JH> What does the 1<*> stand for, and the 9<*> ???
I'm not sure exactly.
However, I see that sort of thing come up when a syn operation has been
done, but the folders cache hasn't been updated. So, it represents the
count on t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello David,
Saturday, January 31, 2004, 3:58:07 PM, you wrote:
> With Beta/50 my reply templates from the address book don't work
> anymore. For instance I have a special reply template for the tbbeta
> list. But when I reply to a message from this
Hallo TBBETA Martin!
Am Samstag, 31. Januar 2004 um 16:04:43 schrieben Sie:
> Yes, it's been discussed in the thread titled '[2.03 Beta/50] Unexpected
> change in templates priority', and the bug has been already fixed.
And when we are at it: It's not just reply templates, but all of them.
I had
17 matches
Mail list logo