Hello Leif,
Saturday, October 23, 1999, 6:07:32 AM, you wrote:
> Yes Outlook and Communicator
> package all that stuff together, but they are both bloated pigs of
> software that don't do their jobs very well.
We have used Communicator since 4.5 version and Netscape 3.0 before for
mail and it w
Hi Oleg,
on Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 2:27:03 PM GMT+0800, Oleg Zalyalov wrote:
OZ> Monday, October 25, 1999, Steve Lamb wrote about
OZ> Standard Templates:
SL>> Sunday, October 24, 1999, 10:57:13 PM, Thomas wrote:
>>> - all templates should add "-- /n" before the sig.
>>> - Forward template
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Monday, October 25, 1999, Steve Lamb wrote about
Standard Templates:
SL> Sunday, October 24, 1999, 10:57:13 PM, Thomas wrote:
>> - all templates should add "-- /n" before the sig.
>> - Forward template should look like this:
SL> Sure... If each template sho
Hello tracer,
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 5:31:57 PM, you wrote:
t> I get like 100 plus messages with attachments per day and I pay per
t> hour.
I've got the same message-load, but i switched to cable recently, so I
pay a vast amount/month... :-)
t> Missed emails I donot mind, they can send agai
Tuesday, October 26, 1999
Hello Ali,
Tuesday, Tuesday, October 26, 1999, you wrote:
Ali> Hi all,
Ali> "This is where I think you will find the most disagreement. The
Ali> majority of the list members ... Felt very strongly against
Ali> incorporating other functions like new
Tuesday, October 26, 1999
Hello Paula,
(snip)
>>> The other side of this argument is that the vast majority of users use,
>>> will use, and probably need only a fraction of the capability of a
>>> program. They don't need nor care about their software being master of
>>> anything. They also d
Tuesday, October 26, 1999
Hello Ali,
Tuesday, Tuesday, October 26, 1999, you wrote:
Ali> Hi all,
Ali> On Monday, October 25, 1999, 1:04:16 PM (-5 GMT), Denis scribbled:
>> To ban from the list means to disallow the user in question from being
>> allowed to post messages to the list. I think
Tuesday, October 26, 1999
Hello Paula,
(snip)
Paula> That's 15 programs with 15 different interfaces to learn and remember,
Paula> often for tasks that are not performed that frequently. The commonality
Paula> of interfaces and basic functions has benefits that can't be totally
Paula> dismissed o
Tuesday, October 26, 1999
Hello Steve,
Tuesday, Tuesday, October 26, 1999, you wrote:
Steve> Monday, October 25, 1999, 9:56:51 AM, Mail wrote:
>> We are sorry to inform you that your e-mail ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>> has been banned. This means that everytime you try to send
>> us e-mail - you will
Tuesday, October 26, 1999
Hello Denis,
Tuesday, Tuesday, October 26, 1999, you wrote:
Denis> Dear Steve! (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Denis> In your message dated 25/10/1999 and concerning "You're banned !" you wrote:
SL>> Monday, October 25, 1999, 9:56:51 AM, Mail wrote:
>>> We are sorry to i
Tuesday, October 26, 1999
Hello Roel,
Monday, Monday, October 25, 1999, you wrote:
Roel> Hello Thomas,
Roel> Monday, October 25, 1999, 3:37:31 PM, you wrote:
TF>> Hallo tracer,
t>>> In my case when I reconnect I get the whole load all over again. would
t>>> it be possible NOT to get already
Tuesday, October 26, 1999
Hello Gerald,
Monday, Monday, October 25, 1999, you wrote:
Gerald> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at Monday, October 25, 1999:
>> Batmen,
>> I would say the most user friendly, as well as obvious
>> solution... would simply be an optional plugin that would
>> allow you t
On 26 October 1999 at 18:43, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list:
OS> Sorry, I'd have no problem doing that. One possibility is what you
OS> just mentioned above. If the editor inserted, say, a CR/LF pair
OS> when the user presses Return, it could easily use a single CR to
OS> mark those lines t
Hello Bats!,
I frequently have to send my boss messages and he is very lax about
picking up and reading his messages. I started making his messages
HIGH PRIORITY in the hopes that they would stand out and catch his
eye. I don't know what kind of mail client he uses so I don't even
know
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Saturday, October 23, 1999, 6:10:58 AM, Ali wrote:
> Couldn't it be something as simple as the fact that he needs to toggle
> the view attachments switch setting it to the correct choice.
> View/Attached Files/View Always
> View Automatically *
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers.
On Friday, October 22, 1999, 9:13:06 PM, Leif wrote:
> On Saturday, October 23, 1999, at 4:04 you wrote:
KR>> Hello, everyone.
KR>> Twice now, I have received messages with attachments, but the
KR>> attachment did not show up in TB. There was no attachment pane and
KR>>
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 12:02:49 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Wouldn't it be interesting if we could fill-in "mail from" and "rcpt
> to" in TB! with different addresses than To: and From: ? :-)
Oh, yes, ready made mail forging. No, it would not be interesting. You
want to do that, read th
On Tuesday, October 26, 1999 Steve Lamb wrote:
> As has been repeatedly stated by several people, myself included, the
> headers we see are *data* and are for informational purposes only. They
> really have no bearing on the actual delivery of the message.
Wouldn't it be interesting if w
On Tuesday, October 26, 1999 Anders Engstrom wrote:
> When I'm in an email conversation (send - reply - reply - reply etc)
> my messages doesn't thread as usual. When I send replies from and to
> my different mail accounts (using TB and Linux mutt) the messages
> that normally get threaded
Hello Ali,
On Tuesday, October 26, 1999 Ali Martin wrote:
> When viewing messages by thread, is it really necessary to have the
> subject for every message within a thread displayed? It makes the
> listing appear very cluttered when you expand the threads and the
> repeated listing of the mes
Hi all,
When viewing messages by thread, is it really necessary to have the
subject for every message within a thread displayed? It makes the
listing appear very cluttered when you expand the threads and the
repeated listing of the message subject takes up a lot of screen real
estate, pushi
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 10:43:12 AM, Oliver wrote:
> multi-byte charset, there's enough space in there to use some magic
> sequence as a mark.
What would it do, then, when it sends the message out? :P
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
Hi Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Montag, 25. Oktober 1999 at 23:59:41 you wrote:
MDP> On 25 October 1999 at 20:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list:
MDP> How is the internal paragraph formatting logic supposed to
MDP> distinguish between your intentional newline and the ones
MDP> elsewh
Hi all,
On Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 12:02:28 PM (-5 GMT), Steve scribbled:
>> The Bat! certainly dwarfs it in overall functionality.
> True. But PMMail's interface and the functionality it does have is quite
> polished.
Definitely. That's PMMails strength. It's certainly polished.
--
Hi Patrick,
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 5:42:58 PM, you wrote:
MA>> You can if you lie on the form and use a .com address :) but it seems
MA>> little changed from PMM98 even the unlock password is the same
PE> no, usualy this is not enough. i have a .com email as you see and lie
PE> usualy ;)
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 9:39:49 AM, Ali wrote:
> The Bat! certainly dwarfs it in overall functionality.
True. But PMMail's interface and the functionality it does have is quite
polished.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343
hallo Mark!
on Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 6:31:17 PM, you wrote:
MA> Hi Patrick,
MA> Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 4:21:24 PM, you wrote:
PE>> mh.. just had a look at the screenshots. they claim to be pmmail2000
PE>> shots but actually show pmmail/98 at the top of the window... seems
PE>> that n
Hi all,
On Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 11:31:17 AM (-5 GMT), Mark scribbled:
> You can if you lie on the form and use a .com address :) but it seems
> little changed from PMM98 even the unlock password is the same
Yeah, I just had a look at it and it's pretty much the same except for
a print te
Hi Patrick,
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 4:21:24 PM, you wrote:
PE> mh.. just had a look at the screenshots. they claim to be pmmail2000
PE> shots but actually show pmmail/98 at the top of the window... seems
PE> that not so much has changed... and we aliens outside of the US don't
PE> get the PG
Hello The Bat! developers,
There are some features I would like to see in your program:
Could we please have a right click 'Create Kill filter' in the
Specials menu, would save a lot of time when zapping spam
Regards,
Mark Aston
--
-
Hi all,
On Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 11:19:32 AM (-5 GMT), Anders scribbled:
> I'm a new user of TB (and liking it better each day) but I've got
> one problem:
> When I'm in an email conversation (send - reply - reply - reply etc)
> my messages doesn't thread as usual. When I send repl
Hi.
I'm a new user of TB (and liking it better each day) but I've got
one problem:
When I'm in an email conversation (send - reply - reply - reply etc)
my messages doesn't thread as usual. When I send replies from and to
my different mail accounts (using TB and Linux mutt) the messa
Hi, friends.
A month ago, I used Opera as my browser. I got tired of some problems, and then
uninstalled it and installed Netscape. Netscape includes a browser, a mailer,
and a newsreader. Or should I say a mediocre browser and a mediocre mailer? (I
didn't use the newsreader).
Now I'm ab
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 8:21:24 AM, Patrick wrote:
> mh.. just had a look at the screenshots. they claim to be pmmail2000
> shots but actually show pmmail/98 at the top of the window... seems
> that not so much has changed...
Bug fixes, mostly. Not much that would show up in the screen sh
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 7:10:47 AM, Patrick wrote:
> and where can i get it from? a search for pmmail and bsw didn't
> help...
http://www.blueprintsoftwareworks.com
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main conne
Monday, October 25, 1999, 11:13:31 AM, Thomas wrote:
> I don't actually know "the PGP envelope" is, but I do know that other
> people who use my computer cannot read encrypted mails without my
> passphrase.
The PGP envelope is the whole "- Begin PGP Block -" and the
associated ending
hallo Ali!
on Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 4:59:26 PM, you wrote:
AM> Hi all,
AM> On Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 9:10:47 AM (-5 GMT), Patrick scribbled:
where did you get /this/ version from? i waited for a year for a new
version of PMmail but eventualy bought the bat last week... mh...
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 6:56:42 AM, Leif wrote:
> Here's the entire kludges from an e-mail I received. Notice the
> absence of a TO, CC, etc. I Wonder how they suppressed them...
-
{morpheus@teleute:~} telnet 0 25
Trying 0.0.0.0...
Connected to 0.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 rpglink.com
Hi all,
On Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 9:10:47 AM (-5 GMT), Patrick scribbled:
>>> where did you get /this/ version from? i waited for a year for a new
>>> version of PMmail but eventualy bought the bat last week... mh...
SL>> PMMail2000 was released Oct. 15th after PMMail98 and PMMail/2 wer
Hallo Steve,
On Monday, October 25, 1999, 11:24:47 PM (GMT+0800), Steve Lamb wrote:
RM>>> + A new checkbox inside a Adress Entry Property:
RM>>> "Always encrypt outgoing E-mail to this user" (PGP)
>> Agree.
SL> While I agree with this you are aware this is possible with templates,
SL> ri
hallo Steve!
on Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 3:51:23 PM, you wrote:
SL> Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 3:03:15 AM, Patrick wrote:
>> where did you get /this/ version from? i waited for a year for a new
>> version of PMmail but eventualy bought the bat last week... mh...
SL> PMMail2000 was release
Hello users,
Here's the entire kludges from an e-mail I received. Notice the
absence of a TO, CC, etc. I Wonder how they suppressed them...
Return-Path: <>
Received: from nf4.netforward.com (nf4.netforward.com [204.57.67.249]) by
www.subdimension.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA13816 for <[
Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 3:03:15 AM, Patrick wrote:
> where did you get /this/ version from? i waited for a year for a new
> version of PMmail but eventualy bought the bat last week... mh...
PMMail2000 was released Oct. 15th after PMMail98 and PMMail/2 were sold
from Southsoft to BSW.
--
Hi,
Well I think I finally figured out why this problem was happening. It
appears that my account specific templates are overriding the personal
templates for specific address book entries. This isn't the way is's
supposed to happen is it?
Thanks,
Kevin
> Has anyone reported this one, or doe
At 6:22:54 AM on Tuesday, October 26, 1999, your quill inscribed unto the ether:
> By the way, it seems that some people have problems with internal
> image viewer. Maybe integrating IrfanView in TheBat! would solve this
> problem (and bring many advantages)? Just look at the way Windows
> Comman
Hi all,
On Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 1:51:50 AM (-5 GMT), Steve scribbled:
> I meant automatically when the message is loaded. It wil still
> ask for your PGP password. There is no need to leave a decrypted
> message on the HD if TB! did it all automatically and seamlessly.
> Take a look
[Monday, October 25, 1999, 5:44:55 AM]
Soth -> John T. Moran
S> Yippers, runs under win2k np. :-) Although I seem to be having trouble
S> with the internal image viewer -- it comes up as a grey window with no
S> image loaded. I think that I've fallen in love with win2k. ;-)
By the way, it seem
On Tuesday, October 26, 1999, Michael Frotscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One strange question: I have several mail-addresses. Now when I write a new
> Message, I can choose with "From:" in the header from which mail-address this
> mail should come.
>
> It changes the "Reply-To" corre
Monday, October 25, 1999, 4:55:03 PM, Leif wrote:
> Even though none of my PGP encrypted messages had anything damaging or
> even important in them, I am glad that TB didn't automatically decrypt
> and/or store the decrypted versions.
I meant automatically when the message is loaded. It wil
Hallo The Bat! Users,
One strange question: I have several mail-addresses. Now when I write a new
Message, I can choose with "From:" in the header from which mail-address this
mail should come.
It changes the "Reply-To" correctly to the new address, but the letter is sent
from the acco
hallo Steve!
on Tuesday, October 26, 1999, 8:51:50 AM, you wrote:
SL> Monday, October 25, 1999, 4:55:03 PM, Leif wrote:
>> Even though none of my PGP encrypted messages had anything damaging or
>> even important in them, I am glad that TB didn't automatically decrypt
>> and/or store the decrypte
51 matches
Mail list logo
