y had it compiled to save me the time of
removing the Apache 2 and installing the Apache 1.3
Anyway, I am open to any suggestions.
Danny
-Original Message-
From: Dale, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 12:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for
have you got the Gnu versions of all the tools, ie gcc, make etc?
-Original Message-
From: Gibson, Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2004 18:01
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.11
Hello All,
Can someone put me out of my misery? I have attempted to
From: "Gibson, Danny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can someone put me out of my misery? I have attempted to build the
> mod_jk.so for Apache 1.3.33 on HP-UX 11.11 multiple times and failing
> miserable.
I don't think we've ever had to compile it, it just comes with the
Apache/Tomcat distribution from HP
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:05:19PM -0500, QM wrote:
> Check your httpd.conf syntax: I forget the exact directive, but you must
> specify *two* lines to load a module in Apache 1.x; just "LoadModule"
> isn't enough.
>
> Check other modules loaded in httpd.conf as a reference. You'll have
> a block
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:44:19PM -0500, Gibson, Danny wrote:
: Syntax error on line 654 of /opt/app/apache1.3.31/conf/httpd.conf:
: Invalid command 'JkMount', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not
: included in the server configuration
: ./apachectl start: httpd could not be started
Thi
btw, I did try the i386 version without any luck.
Anyone else know of any solution...
-Brad
- Original Message -
From: "Lohan Spies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:55 AM
Subje
Sorry didn't see you were using 64 bit.
Just saw tomcat and fedora!
I don't know give it a bash
-Original Message-
From: Brad Hafichuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
Are y
Are you telling me that the i386 version will work on a 64bit processor?
-Brad
- Original Message -
From: "Lohan Spies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:28 AM
Subject: RE: m
http://apache.is.co.za/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/binaries/linux/
here is the link
-Original Message-
From: Lohan Spies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:28 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
There is
There is an already build binary on the Jakarta.tomcat site!
Just go to binaries and search around!
It is a jk2 binary
The package works, I installed it!
-Original Message-
From: Brad Hafichuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Never seen that before.
Did a quick grep (grep -R 'map_alloc' *) through the mod_jk source files for
map_alloc and it is found in
jk/native/common/jk_map.h and
jk/native/common/jk_map.c
The error is saying that it can't find the lib to execute the function.
Maybe you didn't build the common lib..
excuseme, but why did I announce the HOWTO (and binaries) of both
mod_jk and mod_jk2?
Your link is old, although not even as old as my old howto on mod_jk
but twice as involved.
Get the real thing: http://www.humph.com/docs/mod_jk.html
Giuliano
At 11:37 +0100 2003/10/16, James Snelling wrote:
Well, if you keep going with mod_webapp, it will all be wasted, eventually.
It's dead.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:47 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: mod_j
Citeren "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, very. This isn't a problem with mod_jk, as far as I can tell.
>
> The 8080 URL didn't work for me just now, which implies to me that Tomcat
> isn't even up, but that might be due to maintenance instead of error.
>
> Can you post the log entries
the
examples on port 80? Apache's log, mod_jk's log in particular. You might
need to jack up JK's logging level.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:16 AM
> To: To
> > http://web.jurriaan.org/examples/jsp/ [ nothin ]
>
> Clicking on this link for me gives a nice, pretty Tomcat page. Are you
> sure
> that you don't have a caching Proxy server between you and it?
Hi Bill,
The problem isn't that these page's show up (fortunatly) but just click
on one o
"[de internetman] Rene Kooyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Citeren "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Compile/Recompile:
> >
> > In CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native (where CONNECTOR_SRC = wherever you unpacked
the
> > connector src):
> >
> > .
Citeren "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Compile/Recompile:
>
> In CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native (where CONNECTOR_SRC = wherever you unpacked the
> connector src):
>
> ./buildconf.sh
> ./configure --with-apxs=/path/to/apache/bin/apxs
> make
> make install
>
> The .so file will be in CONNECTOR_SR
"[de internetman] Rene Kooyman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Oke, that's done, just use the: /usr/lib/apache folder .. p,
> now were getting somewhere, although i can't compile normaly because
> apxs is located in the other folder ... so b
I get that too and it doesn't cause any problems. I didn't build Apache so
I don't know what's causing it. However you can probably safely ignore it.
Subir
-Original Message-
From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:33 PM
To: Tomc
Compile/Recompile:
In CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native (where CONNECTOR_SRC = wherever you unpacked the
connector src):
./buildconf.sh
./configure --with-apxs=/path/to/apache/bin/apxs
make
make install
The .so file will be in CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native or native2, I forget which.
John
> -Original Mes
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 12:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> according to this :
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/connectors.html
>
> i should need mod_jk2 and not mod_jk (well, mod_jk may also work, but
> hey,..) - and its enabled by default on the appserver im using..
according to this :
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/connectors.html
i should need mod_jk2 and not mod_jk (well, mod_jk may also work, but
hey,..) - and its enabled by default on the appserver im using..
If by any chance i am right, can someone tell me why I cant find a h
I got this on Apache 1.3.27. I assume you downloaded the binary
mod_jk.so. Make sure that you got that fits your use or non-use of SSL
in the server. Not sure where you got the binary, but there is a note on
the jakarta connector download page that lists which binary is for
which.
I myself just co
Oops, didn't read the entire thread before replying. Shame on me...
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Souther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so
Sorry, I mean here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.10/src/
- Original Message -
From: "Ben Souther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: mod
Which connector binaries did you find there?
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Souther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:18 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk.so where from ??
>
>
> I found it here:
> http:
I found it here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.10/bin/
- Original Message -
From: "Adar Wesley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Tomcat Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:05 AM
Su
rs List'
> Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
>
>
> 10x John !
>
> and where would that web site be ?
>
> Tal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
> To: '
10x John !
and where would that web site be ?
Tal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
My website by the end of the week. Other than that, no.
My website by the end of the week. Other than that, no. Everyone has been
building them from source.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Adar Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: mod_jk.so where from ??
>
>
Sorry, for linux:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/linux/i386/
MadBit wrote:
>mod_jk seems the same for tc3.x. Take this:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/win32/i386/
>
>
>
> Tomas Straupis wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
mod_jk seems the same for tc3.x. Take this:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/win32/i386/
Tomas Straupis wrote:
>Hello
>
> I have ap13 and tc4. I want to connect them. But I can't find mod_jk.so
>(eapi). jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors
Hello Again,
Can anybody share a copy of their mod_jk.conf file, workers.properties, and
server.xml that has Tomcat 4.0.1 and Apache2 or Apache 1.3.x running, I
would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. Walter B.
> Ok,
>
> I now have several compiled versions of mod_jk.so thanks to
to install mod_jk you should read this :
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/config/ajp.html
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Billingham, Walter 475 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Envoye : mardi 23 juillet 2002 15:23
> A : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Objet : mod_jk.so
>
>
> Ok,
>
>
chance I might try
>compiling mod_jk and see how it works.
>what version of apache are you using?
>
>Jeff
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Antonio Trigo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:36 AM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so
how it works.
what version of apache are you using?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Trigo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11
Ravi,
Can u send me the binary version of mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11
Ravi,
Can u send me the binary version of mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.
Thanks in advance.
Trigo
-Original Message-
From: Ravi Verma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: sexta-feira, 14 de Junho de 2002 3:37
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11
Dear Fr
HELP i asked this question yesterday still no reply
ryan
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Having problem upgrading a box. The box is running red hat linux
> 6.2 with apache 1.3.20 with modssl, it is running with Tomcat 3.2.2. I was
> in the process of upgrading my apache 1.3.20 to
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, abhishek srivastava wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have downloaded the new tomcat 4.0.4 today. I also downloaded the source
> for the jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.4-src ... when I run ant the build
> says build successfull. but there is no mod_jk.so to be found.
>
> I also went i
On 24 Jun 2002, Sean M Alderman wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 10:54, abhishek srivastava wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I have downloaded the new tomcat 4.0.4 today. I also downloaded the source
> > for the jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.4-src ... when I run ant the build
> > says build successful
On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 10:54, abhishek srivastava wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have downloaded the new tomcat 4.0.4 today. I also downloaded the source
> for the jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.4-src ... when I run ant the build
> says build successfull. but there is no mod_jk.so to be found.
When y
is there something to do to omit this error
i can't use AJP connector.
My system is Linux/Slackware 8.0 and kernel 2.4.19pre1
Tomcat version 4.0.3
Connector from package jakarta-connector-tomcat-4.0.2src download from
jakarta.apache.org.
i did:
tar zxf jakarta-connector-tomcat-4.0.2src
cd
I have been getting the same error for days and have tried a lot of things
to no avail. Lets try to share our experiences and hopefully we can both
find a solution
- Original Message -
From: "zibie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 5:06 AM
Subject
to walk through the configure program with echo statements
to determine where you need
to force the if test statements to do what you want
Good Luck
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
Hi,
thanks for the reply, in that site is not present only an old version
of Tomcat with mod_jserv?
Thanks
Paolo
> I have been getting the same error trying to compile mod_webapp for to
mcat
> 4.
>
> Since you are using tomcat 3.3 you might check out
> http://www.hp.com/product
I have been getting the same error trying to compile mod_webapp for tomcat
4.
Since you are using tomcat 3.3 you might check out
http://www.hp.com/products1/unix/webservers/apache/index.html
and download the apache/tomcat application offered there. it comes with
mod_jk.so according to the doc
Hi,
Ed Tybursky wrote:
> Does anyone have a compiled version of mod_jk.so for Solaris 8 running
> on a sparc that I may have real quick?
I've uploaded some (with and without EAPI) to http://ponschab.de/mod_jk/
But i recommend compiling mod_jk by yourself.
Marc
I got my mod_jk file from the Tomcat 3.3 binary distribution. There's a
folder in there named native with two version of mod_jk -- eap and noeap.
How your Apache was built (with or with out EAP) will determine which to use.
Just a hint though -- if your version of Apache uses SSL, it definit
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:14 PM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
>thank you, i've always wondered about this...
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jan Labanowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednes
thank you, i've always wondered about this...
-Original Message-
From: Jan Labanowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:29 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
It seems like you can either be correct or you have to m
This is a perfect explanation.. thanks!!
R.
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Labanowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
> It seems like you can either be correct or you
Message-
>From: Jan Labanowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:29 PM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
>It seems like you can either be correct or you have to make it easy for
>people who refuse to read the
It seems like you can either be correct or you have to make it easy for
people who refuse to read the background information.
"mod_jk-eapi.so" is for the EAPI (Extended Application Programming Interface) of
Apache. You USUALLY need the EAPI when you install mod_ssl module for Apache.
But you can
yeah!!!
R.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Weissenbacher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:00 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
> >How many times I have answered to that ?
> >eapi is for apache c
sa, but it helps understanding that something's wrong with what
you are doing...
L.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Weissenbacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:00 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
>How many t
>How many times I have answered to that ?
>eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
>noeapi for std apache
so why not name mod_jk-eapi.so -> mod_jk-ssl.so?
michael
t;> >
>> > :)
>> >
>> > -
>> > Henri Gomez ___[_]
>> > EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
>> > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
>> > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>>
(_)..oOOo...
> > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
> >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:26 AM
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Re:
> EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:26 AM
&
...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-Original Message-
>From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:26 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
I use Debian...
R.
- Original Message -
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
> If you using Linux, may I propose you take a look
> at my RPMs :
&g
: 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-Original Message-
>From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:12 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
>
>
>sorry.. now I have understood!!
>but where
sorry.. now I have understood!!
but where I find mod_jk for Linux for Tomcat 3.2.3??
Thanks!
R.
- Original Message -
From: "Roberto B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:07 AM
Subject: mod_jk.so differences
> I used Tomcat 4 with Apache but
Le Mercredi 15 Août 2001 22:47, vous avez écrit :
> I place mod_jk.so in my /etc/httpd/modules directory and then used
> LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
>
> in httpd.conf. Either case, check where your mod_jk.so file is and set the
> LoadModule directive to it. Either absolute or
I place mod_jk.so in my /etc/httpd/modules directory and then used
LoadModule jk_modulemodules/mod_jk.so
in httpd.conf. Either case, check where your mod_jk.so file is and set the
LoadModule directive to it. Either absolute or relative path to /etc/httpd
should work.
I'm also on
Jonathon Wallen a écrit :
>
> >
> >My probleme:
Thanks but no, it doesn't change something.
> you have this line in your httpd.conf -
> LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so
>
> maybe it should be -
> LoadModule jk_module /etc/httpd/libexec/mod_jk.so
>
> I'm just as new to t
matt a écrit :
>
> how did you know you wanted the eapi mod_jk rather than non?
I didn't know.
I've tried with both of them.
With the noeapi, apache don't start.
I'm using Mandrake, so I guess that they use an enhanced version of
apache.
Yann Sagon
Yann Sagon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm very new to tomcat + apache.
>
> I've dowmloaded tomcat 3.2.3 and mod_jk.so (eapi)
> I'v installed tomcat as a standalone version without problem.
>
> Now, I want to use it with apache and some virtual hosts.
In case you aren't a French native speaker, write b
>
>My probleme:
>when I try to start apache:
>
>#apachectl start
>Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 774 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
>Invalid command 'JkMount', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module
>not included in the server configuration
>
how did you know you wanted the eapi mod_jk rather than non?
Edit the apxs and make sure the path to your apahce is correct (It is hard
coded)
I have a compiled mod_jk.so (but it is for a specific version of Apache)
try using this command to compile (youll have to change the path to your
apahce)
/opt/pokemon/lib/server/apache/1.3.12+ssl_0.95-solaris2.70/b
Funny signature!
Kyle Wayne Kelly
(504)391-3985
http://www.cs.uno.edu/~kkelly
- Original Message -
From: "raghu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tomcat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 7:01 AM
Subject: mod_jk.so unable to compile, please help. Urgent
>
> ../jk/jk_jni_worker.c
unsubscribe me please ...
DISCLAIMER :
The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It
may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you
Hi,
How many times do I have to post this in one week??? 8o)
http://willow.cc.edu/adminguide
http://users.aber.ac.uk/aff9
or for a list of builds of mod_jk I have:-
http://users.aber.ac.uk/aff9/tomcat/tomcat-3.2/
JDK 1.3.0 can be found at
http://users.aber.ac.uk/pms
Adam.
Adam Fowler
Lally, Keith R wrote:
> Where does one get the mod_jk.so binary for linux?
This is the only one I could find:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1/bin/linux/i386/mod_jk.so
although I think I tried this one and it didn't work. Ended up compiling
it from source, whic
Crystal clear now! I was wondering what the files were because the last time
I got the mod_jk file there was just one of them lying around!
Many thanks to all who replied.
Vinay
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Kilbride" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10,
>-Original Message-
>From: Ryan Worley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:32 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi
>
>
>When you say EAPI (mod_ssl), do you mean if apache is using mod_ssl
>specifically or if
July 10, 2001 1:00 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so-eapi vs mod_jk.so-noeapi
> mod_jk.so-eapi is to be used when your apache is using EAPI (mod_ssl)
> mod_jk.so-noeapi when using plain std Apache
mod_jk.so-eapi is to be used when your apache is using EAPI (mod_ssl)
mod_jk.so-noeapi when using plain std Apache
:)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53
Gomez,
I have found docs about the argument on TC 3.3 but not on 3.2.
BTW thanks now I have understood.
Pier Paolo.
- Original Message -
From: "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 3:02 PM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so f
>is there someone that knows why exists two files mod_jk.so (-eapi and
-noeapi) for LINUX?
I'm updating the mod_jk doc on TC 3.2/3.3/J-T-C
>Which do I have to use? Do I have to cut the word after '.so'?
If you have an Apache with EAPI (ie mod_ssl) use mod_jk.so-eapi
and rename to mod_jk.so
lp: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: RE: mod
ROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
>list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>list-unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>list-post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
>Henri, I've been trying to use libpthread because when I try
>and build mod_jk
>with apxs on Tru64 UNIX v5.1 I get the following error:
>
>cc: Error: /usr/opt/java130/include/jni.h, line 35: #error
>"Modules that
>interface with Java must be compiled and linked with the
>-pthread option)
A
ECTED]
>From: GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:27:58 +0200
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N
>
>There is no need to build mod_jk
There is no need to build mod_jk with libpthread under Apache 1.3.19
The pthread stuff is required 'ONLY' in threaded mode, ie Apache 2.0
>-Original Message-
>From: Stewart Mclean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 4:59 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: mod_jk.so
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 12:10 PM
> Try it with
> gcc -shared -o mod_jk.so *.o -lposix4
> that worked for me on Solaris 8 x86.
nope. no good either.
I did notice more output though, because the first cou
Kevin Shortt wrote:
>
>
> Then I've done this:
> gcc -shared -o mod_jk.so *.o
> And recieved this:
> ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but
>non-writable
> sections
> collect2: ld returned 1 e
Yes, that's a problem most of us had to overcame.
Means that the module was compiled in a diferent platform than yours, you'll
have to download the source code of mod_jk and compile it.
hth,
m-
> Hello,
> I have compiled Tomcat from the source on RH 7.0 and now I am getting the
> following err
DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-Original Message-
>From: Arne Borkowski (borko.net) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:25 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I am using Apache 1.3.12 under RedHat 6.1 ..
I have the same doubt, i use 1.3.17. Why on win32 now,
all module has .so ending? what i think is .so is for
unix only. am i right?
--- Ellis Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I currently use Apache1.3.14 + Tomcat 3.2.1 +
> mod_jk.dll on Win32.
>
> I recently tried to upgrade to Apache 1.3.19
M
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?
>
>
> Which version of Apache/HTTPD server are you using?
>
>
> Pae
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Arne Borkowski (borko.net) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which version of Apache/HTTPD server are you using?
Pae
-Original Message-
From: Arne Borkowski (borko.net) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:35 PM
Subject: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?
>Hi,
>
>I tried to compile Jakarta mod_jk.so
t; [jk_worker.c (164)]: wc_create_worker validate failed for ajp12
> > [jk_worker.c (229)]: build_worker_map failed to create workerajp12
> >
> > Waiting for a early response.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Prashanth Marathe D
> > Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
Benoit Jacquemont
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> @smile.fr>cc:
>
> Subject:
> RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat
> 04/03/01 03:32 PM
jp12
>
> Waiting for a early response.
>
> Regards,
> Prashanth Marathe D
> Phone: 667-8355 Ext.: 262
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
> Benoit Jacquemont
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Benoit Jacquemont
@smile.fr>cc:
Subject: RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux
Redhat
04/03/01 03:32 P
Hi,
You can get one from the jakarta web site:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1/bin/linux/i38
6/mod_jk.so
I use Tomcat 3.2.1.
This version of the mod_jk worked for me with a Apache 1.3.12, and when I
installed a Apache 1.3.19, it was said 'garbled', and I had to bui
:
Subject: Re: ** mod_jk.so for Linux
Redhat
04/03/01 6.2- required **
03:23 PM
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
