Rohit (or anyone else able to answer) - are we waiting for any more fixes
before going for a 4.5.1 RC2 vote or is it a case of David finding the
time to do it?
-Original Message-
From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
Sent: 02 April 2015 09:14
To: users@cloudstack.apache
I think that the issue is with needing a controller. Unfortunately you can't
just replace VLANs with VXLANs unless there's some form of control plane.
You can do this in a distributed manner using broadcast to multicast
mechanisms but this AFAIK is not implemented in Openvswitch. I'm not quite
sure
meone to takes it personally when I don't deliver
> I wanted to provide some follow up to address the "rant" and try to
> provide perspective on why the things are the way they are.
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Somesh Naidu
>
> wrote:
> > Adrian,
> >
erspective
on why the things are the way they are.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Somesh Naidu
wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> Rant or not, I believe you have raised a valid point and reflect certain
> group of peoples requirement.
>
> Based on your requirement, I believe you are looking for s
Tempted to suggest some sort of special interest group where networking
people can have some input into the dev process despite not necessarily
being able to produce any code themselves. As an example, Schuberg Philis
have recently done some great work on the redundant VPC VR but to a
network perso
Hi Rob,
I believe it will be on the Shapeblue site early next week although the
session was part presentation and part demo so you won't get the demo bit.
There was no video recording done that I'm aware of.
Cheers,
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: r...@fotm.net [mailto:r...@fotm.net]
Se
outer without NAT (IPv4 or IPv6)
As of now there is no way to disable NAT on VPC router.
-Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lewis [mailto:adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 4:58 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: VPC Router without NAT (IPv
Hi Rob,
This is actively being worked on and most of the work is done pending
further testing. You should have your wishes granted in 4.6 (but no 100%
guarantees). Not sure if you're UK based but you just missed a
presentation on this at the London user group meet up yesterday. Some
great work by
Hi,
It’s been asked before but does anyone know of a way to completely disable
NAT (specifically source NAT) on a VPC router on 4.4 or 4.5? There doesn’t
sem to be an easy way to do this via the web interface. I’d like to use the
VPC router for multi-subnet L3 routing but the ‘public’ network wo
Vision Solutions CP&R product seems pretty much abandoned. Not supported
on CS versions later than v3.0.
On 31 Jan 2015 00:19, "Nux!" wrote:
> Not much choice here, unless you start doing backups inside the VMs.
>
> HTH
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nu
I’m finding that there’s nothing (for our requirements at least) unless you
go direct to the hypervisors or the VM OS instances using agents. Keen to
know if anyone’s found better solutions. Think there might be some
solutions if you’re only using VMware but I’ve ignored them as we’re using
Xenserv
Hi All,
Just wondering if anyone out there is using CS to provide customers with DR
services and how? Most of the commercial products out there that might
allow us to do so involve either some sort of SAN replication or else
direct access to the hypervisor hosts. Vision Solutions have an old pro
Rohit,
I don’t suppose you will be creating the el7 packages as well will you?
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 13 January 2015 07:37
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4
4.5 AFAIK. Hugo's done the work for el7. If it's trivial, that would be a
nice backport for 4.3/4.4 but not sure it could really be considered as a
bugfix so pretty sure we'll have to wait for 4.5.
-Original Message-
From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com]
Sent: 09 Januar
>From what I've read there won’t be support for Ceph in Creedence (Xenserver
6.5) but it is on the cards for the following release (as should NFSv4 and a
Centos 7 dom0). There's a blog post from Tim Mackey at:
http://xenserver.org/discuss-virtualization/virtualization-blog/entry/beyond-creedence-xe
As far as I can tell, we're not going to see Centos 7 support for the
management server on any 4.3 or 4.4 branch but the 4.5 branch should have
it in already. Can't comment on compute hosts however.
I'd love to hear if anyone knows otherwise though, especially about
'backporting' the functionality
Hi,
Just wondering if rather than downloading, installing and testing for
myself, someone might happen to know whether the CS 4.4.1(RC) management
server will work happily on Centos 7 yet? I understand that a patch has
been made for 4.5/master (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7
ad the content into secondary ACS.
Alena from Citrix explained how she did it @ CCNA14 in Denver.
3) needless to say, you IP between datacenters will change, so VMs should
know how to handle that change
regards
ilya
On 9/10/14, 7:10 AM, Adrian Lewis wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> We’
Hi All,
We’re currently looking into the possibility of creating a DR as a service
offering for our customers based on ACS. I’m assuming that trying to create
a fully open source solution is not feasible and am looking to evaluate
Vision Solutions’ Double-Take Cloud Protection and Recovery produ
Hi Piers,
Not sure if this is of any help but I've had similar issues when trying to
install the mgmt server on a machine with anything less than 4G RAM. I've
also found that the mgmt server can take a good few minutes to fully start
up and after a while of scratching my head and trying to deciphe
Hi Sebastien,
I'm afraid I wouldn't have a clue how to patch the source but
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6892 should be a very
easy one to fix from what I can gather and would solve a fairly critical
issue for anyone attempting to use the DB HA feature in 4.3.
Thanks for putti
& Regards
Damodar/
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lewis [mailto:adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:57 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Examples of configuring DB HA?
Hi Damoder,
Thank you so much for this. I'm not sure if I've done it proper
s loader. Ideally the jar
cloud-plugin-database-mysqlha-4.3.0.jar should also be loaded from the
common class loader instead of webapp class loader.
Can you try to load the jar "cloud-plugin-database-mysqlha-4.3.0.jar" in
common.loader.
Thanks & Regards
Damodar/
-Original Mess
l
META-INF/maven/org.apache.cloudstack/cloud-plugin-database-mysqlha/pom.properties
[root@cs-mgmt ~]#
Surely there's the class and that path is where a lot of other
cloudstack-related jar files live so I'm guessing that is also in the
classpath.
Anyone?
-Original Message-
From: Adri
this kind of thing happens...
How did you set up the CS version ? I mean fresh install 4.3 or upgrade from
an older version?
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Adrian Lewis
wrote:
> I guess my question should perhaps be, does anyone know why the jar
> that contains the class isn’t alr
I guess my question should perhaps be, does anyone know why the jar that
contains the class isn’t already in the classpath and what's the best way to
fix it?
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lewis [mailto:adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk]
Sent: 09 June 2014 23:37
To: users@cloudstack.apach
t: Re: Examples of configuring DB HA?
Well, tomcat is returning 404, because the app is not running. As a
consequence of a class not found exception. Find the jar that contains the
classes that are missing and add them into the classpath.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Adrian Lewis
wrote:
&g
dException:
com.cloud.utils.db.StaticStrategy
Anyone got any idea? Tried Googling and searching the mailing list but
nothing that I can see as an answer. I’m just a lowly network engineer so
wouldn’t know what these errors mean but I’m guessing I won’t be the first.
Any ideas?
*From:* Adrian Lewis [
imal
> documentation in the 4.3 doc. The design doc also contains the links to
> mysql site for setting up the replication for fresh as well as existing
> setups.
> >
> > From the cloud stack side it is purely failover and falling back between
> the IPs configured
Hi all,
Does anyone have any example configs or blog posts explaining the DB HA
features introduced in 4.3? Between the section in the design docs on the
wiki and the official docs, I’m a little confused as to how it’s supposed
to be set up – they appear to differ although there’s a lot more det
And "Integration of Citrex XenDesktop and XenApp with CloudStack - Paul
Howard" is cut short to about 4 minutes. Is this the right place to report
things like this? Would also be nice to correct the typo if it's being
uploaded again.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault [ma
"the auditors are different in their understanding of the guidelines" -
that's the tricky bit. PCI DSS is more of a guidance than a rigid and
defined set of rules. True, there are rules but many are open to
interpretation. There have been many arguments over whether or not shared
infrastructure can
I think the free trial mentioned is about how the software lets you give
customers/tenants a free trial of your CS offering and is not related to
getting a free trial of the Fogpanel software itself.
-Original Message-
From: Outback Dingo [mailto:outbackdi...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 March 2014
15:39
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Custom billing Application using CloudStack API
Does anyone know in more depth if Hostbill is a good solution for billing
with cloudstack? Or how was your experience using Hostbill integrated with
cloudstack?.
De: Adrian Lewis
mailto:adr.
Not sure of the quality or its applicability to what you're doing but
Hostbill have recently updated their Cloudstack integration to work with
the usage data for a more utility-like way of billing.
-Original Message-
From: Juan Gomez [mailto:juan.go...@kumo.com.co]
Sent: 06 March 2014 13:5
AFAIK, one of the features introduced in 4.3 is remote access VPNs for VPCs.
The VR in a VPC is slightly different to the VR for non-VPC usage so you may
need to upgrade to 4.3. Official release seems fairly imminent
(http://markmail.org/thread/3nnroif5fqr3c2q6) but could still be blocked if
a majo
/browse/CLOUDSTACK-755
Suggest you add your vote to try and get its profile raised etc
Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Lewis [mailto:adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk]
Sent: 12
Hi All,
Just wondering what the purpose of specifying a "super CIDR" for a VPC
actually is? Reasons for it that I can think of (not even sure of they're
correct) are:
1. Sets the quickmode selectors for IPsec VPNs
2. Sets up some form of routing sanity checks such as RPF in the VR
On Feb 5, 2014, at 4:34 AM, Adrian Lewis
wrote:
> It's being worked on already. When the FOSDEM videos get uploaded I
> think you should be able to take a look at Hugo Trippaers' talk:
>
> https://fosdem.org/2014/schedule/event/virtiaas21/
>
> Can't say for
It's being worked on already. When the FOSDEM videos get uploaded I think
you should be able to take a look at Hugo Trippaers' talk:
https://fosdem.org/2014/schedule/event/virtiaas21/
Can't say for sure whether it was recorded or not though.
-Original Message-
From: Dag Sonstebo [mailto:
rom: Adrian Lewis [mailto:adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 10:23 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: 4.2.1 anytime soon?
Do we have any projected dates for the official 4.2.1 release yet? I
understand that there's an ACL disclosure issue that is under discu
mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: 27 November 2013 18:11
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon?
On Nov 27, 2013, at 6:52 PM, Adrian Lewis
wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> Thanks for the reply and the link - I never knew about that option.
> Are these RPMs likely to be upgra
November 2013 17:33
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.2.1 anytime soon?
On Nov 27, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Adrian Lewis
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Hoping that someone here might know what's holding up the release of
4.2.1?
> A vote was cast back on the 12th Nov which
Hi All,
Hoping that someone here might know what’s holding up the release of 4.2.1?
A vote was cast back on the 12th Nov which appeared to be all fine with
everyone eventually. Citrix have released Cloudplatform 4.2.1. As far as I
can tell, the only thing missing was finalising the release notes
ion.
Round robin reads and writes supported.
1] http://www.percona.com/
Patrick
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Adrian Lewis
wrote:
> Hi Marty/Nux!,
>
> Thanks for the feedback - sounds like multi-master is not a good thing
> then! Load will likely be very small for at least the
, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Adrian Lewis
wrote:
> Hi Marty/Nux!,
>
> Thanks for the feedback - sounds like multi-master is not a good thing
> then! Load will likely be very small for at least the next 6 months
> but I figured that it was one of those things that could be set easily
> now
your
setup - what loads are you experiencing?
Marty
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Adrian Lewis
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Just wondering if anyone is using a MySQL multi-master configuration
> with auto_increment_offset (e.g.10) and auto_increment_increment (1
> for server
Hi All,
Just wondering if anyone is using a MySQL multi-master configuration with
auto_increment_offset (e.g.10) and auto_increment_increment (1 for server
1, 2 for server 2 etc)? Does it work? Does anyone know a reason why it
doesn’t or wouldn’t work? Is there anything from an application point
Hi All,
Still in the planning stages of deploying my first CS install and I have a
question about the SSVM and the apparent requirement for a public routable
IP address. From what I can gather, the only interaction that the SSVM has
with the internet is for downloading files from user or admin s
Centos is wrong - I've used Centos 6.4 and the path needs to be:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-t
mplt
instead of:
/usr/lib64/cloud/common/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt
as documented
Not sure if the download URL is correct either. I've
No answers I'm afraid Len but keen to hear what the definitive answer is
regarding Xen guests. Anyone?
-Original Message-
From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com]
Sent: 07 October 2013 19:10
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: question about snapshots and Windows Volume S
would also be of significant interest,
> especially if there's a similar requirement enforced at the LDAP side
Account passwords and instance passwords are very separate. One would hope
that the instance passwords given via the "reset" function are purely
throw-away/use-once passwor
Hi Ian,
Is this something that you might be looking to change? I would have thought
that people looking to implement your LDAP work will be interested in it
from a security point of view so having password complexity rules would also
be of significant interest, especially if there's a similar requ
his front and may be able to assist
with documentation but I doubt I'll be much use with development.
Kind regards,
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen
Sent: 29 July 2013 08:44
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Big Switch & Floodlight
On Jul 25, 2013, at
Hi All,
Just wondering if the Bigswitch integration for CS requires the Big Virtual
Switch component or whether this is just a complimentary aspect? I ask this
as I’m wondering if the future holds the possibility of using the
Floodlight controller in CS with third party Floodlight compatible ‘ap
Sebastien,
The preview uses a centos install with a custom repo for the XenServer
goodies. Details in the link:
http://xenserver.org/blog/entry/tech-preview-of-xenserver-libvirt-ceph.htm
l
XAPI is part of this and this appears to be the way forward with regards
to distributing XenServer as oppos
Hi,
First post and only just subscribed so not sure if this will connect up
with the existing thread but I’m very interested in XenServer and Ceph/RBD.
I understand that Wido has informally committed to building the
Xenserver/RBD glue when it is supported on XenServer (think this was in a
video
57 matches
Mail list logo
