On 20:59, Eelco Hillenius wrote:
It's probably a good idea to have a specialized implementation of
ISessionStore for App Engine that uses whatever makes sense with App
Engine for medium term storage ('cause that's what it is... short term
storage is the current page, which is typically local
Developer,
jWeekend: OO Java Technologies - Development and Training
http://jWeekend.com
-
http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk My blog: http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Google-App-Engine-and-Wicket-tp23001592p25973504.html
Sent from the Wicket
On 20.10.2009 13:30, richardwilko wrote:
Hi,
The Terracotta SecondLevelCacheSessionStore does not contain any Terracotta
specific implementation or dependencies, and should work fine on AppEngine
(I haven't tested it though).
All it is is an implementation of IPageStore, where the pages are
-wilkinson.co.uk My blog: http://richard-wilkinson.co.uk
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Google-App-Engine-and-Wicket-tp23001592p25974145.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Google-App-Engine-and-Wicket-tp23001592p25974473.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands
On 20.10.2009 14:48, richardwilko wrote:
Oh, sorry I just realized that it has the terracotta licence header on it,
had I realized i would have removed it. That's because the version of the
file i had to hand was from the terracotta forge svn repo, and code in there
has to have their licence.
with Google App Engine and Wicket and things
seemed to work fairly well once I turned off the ModificationWatcher.
However, I realized that my simple tests were all stateless and that once
stateful, Wicket would use the DiskPageStore to write some files, which is
not allowed in the App Engine sandbox
I've followed with interest all the wicket on GAE threads I can, and these
all seem to address necessary minor tweaks to get it set up, but the one big
thing I haven't seen much discussion on is the BigTable storage system,
since we wouldn't be able to use MySQL.
Maybe that's the whole point for
You can get a dedicated server at GoDaddy for under $100 per month.
I've had one running Java / Wicket apps with an uptime of around two
years now. With your very small load, you could also use
redwoodvirtual and use a Linux Virtual Server for $20 or $40. I also
had a server with them running
handling the uploads,
http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/java.html#fileforms
Br,
Juha
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Matthew Welch matt...@welchkin.net wrote:
I've been experimenting a bit with Google App Engine and Wicket and things
seemed to work fairly well once I turned off
Both articles avoid the DiskPageStore problem by using the HttpSessionStore,
however if you do a search through the mailing list archives for
HttpSessionStore you'll find numerous references to problems in using it in
the long term and especially in a real, production application, so I don't
Maarten Bosteels wrote:
But AFAIK GAE doesn't use/guarantee sticky sessions, so I am afraid
you can't rely on local memory.
App Engine uses multiple web servers to run your application, and
automatically adjusts the number of servers it is using to handle
requests reliably. A given request may
Good news:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/msg/f50bbb131dc524c1
quote
HttpSessions will work out of the box if you enable them in your
appengine-web.xml.
We do not guarantee that all requests for the same session go to the same
JVM, but persistence of sessions is managed
I've been experimenting a bit with Google App Engine and Wicket and things
seemed to work fairly well once I turned off the ModificationWatcher.
However, I realized that my simple tests were all stateless and that once
stateful, Wicket would use the DiskPageStore to write some files, which
Here are a couple of pointers regarding Wicket on GAE:
http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Welch matt...@welchkin.net wrote:
I've been experimenting a bit with Google App Engine and Wicket and things
seemed
/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Welch matt...@welchkin.net
wrote:
I've been experimenting a bit with Google App Engine and Wicket and
things
seemed to work fairly well once I turned off the ModificationWatcher.
However, I realized
/wicket_on_google_app_engine.html
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Sergey Podatelev
brightnesslev...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are a couple of pointers regarding Wicket on GAE:
http://www.danwalmsley.com/2009/04/08/apache-wicket-on-google-app-engine-for-java/
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Matthew Welch matt
17 matches
Mail list logo
