Re: some wget patches against beta3

On Tuesday 07 of October 2003 12:08, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Thanks! btw. looking into test4 I see that autoconf conception is used in weird way. Normally aclocal.m4 is autogenerated by aclocal command (and it includes sources of macros from /usr/share/autoconf/autoconf/*.m4 and from local

Re: some wget patches against beta3

Arkadiusz Miskiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tuesday 07 of October 2003 12:08, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: Thanks! btw. looking into test4 I see that autoconf conception is used in weird way. Normally aclocal.m4 is autogenerated by aclocal command Normally only if you're also using Automake.

Re: some wget patches against beta3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin v. Löwis) writes: Why do you think the scheme is narrow-minded? Because 1.9-beta3 seems to be a problem. VERSION = ('[.0-9]+-?b[0-9]+' '|[.0-9]+-?dev[0-9]+' '|[.0-9]+-?pre[0-9]+' '|[.0-9]+-?rel[0-9]+' '|[.0-9]+[a-z]?'

Re: some wget patches against beta3

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin v. Löwis) writes: Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: VERSION = ('[.0-9]+-?b[0-9]+' '|[.0-9]+-?dev[0-9]+' '|[.0-9]+-?pre[0-9]+' '|[.0-9]+-?rel[0-9]+' '|[.0-9]+[a-z]?'

Re: some wget patches against beta3

Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As for the Polish translation, translations are normally handled through the Translation Project. The TP robot is currently down, but I assume it will be back up soon, and then we'll submit the POT file and update the translations /en masse/. It took

Re: some wget patches against beta3

Karl Eichwalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As for the Polish translation, translations are normally handled through the Translation Project. The TP robot is currently down, but I assume it will be back up soon, and then we'll submit the POT file and

Re: some wget patches against beta3

Karl Eichwalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also, my Croatian translation of 1.9 doesn't seem to have made it in. Is that expected? Unfortunately, yes. Will you please resubmit it with the subject line updated (IIRC, it's now): TP-Robot wget-1.9-b3.hr.po I'm not sure what b3 is, but

Re: some wget patches against beta3

Karl Eichwalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm not sure what b3 is, but the version in the POT file was supposed to be beta3. Was there a misunderstanding somewhere along the line? Yes, the robot does not like beta3 as part of the version string. b3

Re: some wget patches against beta3

Karl Eichwalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hrvoje Niksic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ouch. Why does the robot care about version names at all? It must know about the sequences; this is important for merging issues. IIRC, we have at least these sequences supported by the robot: 1.2 -

Re: some wget patches against beta3

Karl Eichwalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I guess, you as the wget maintainer switched from something supported to the unsupported betaX scheme and now we have something to talk about ;) I had no idea that something as usual as betaX was unsupported. In fact, I believe that bX was added when

some wget patches against beta3

Hi, Here is few patches against test3: http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SOURCES/wget-ac.patch?rev=1.4 (some autoconf 2.5x things) http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SOURCES/wget-pl.patch?rev=1.3 (Polish translation update) -- Arkadiusz MikiewiczCS at FoE, Wroclaw University of

Re: some wget patches against beta3

Thanks for the contribution. Note that a slightly more correct place to send the patch is the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, followed by people with a keener interest in development. Also, you should send at least a short explanation of what each patch is supposed to do and why one should apply it.