http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/masinter/multipart-form-data/master/multipart-form-data.xml&modeAsFormat=html/ascii&type=ascii
> Encoding considerations:Common use is BINARY.
> In limited use (or transports that restrict the encoding to 7BIT
Florian Rivoal wrote:
> If a text input field has lang=foo, and your system has a (virtual)
keyboard for language foo, I would expect that keyboard to be the one
presented to you.
The principle of least surprise argues against this.
Most mobile phones support many more languages and keyboard layo
The trailing dot actually had meaning, but in my periodic testing most
commerce websites didn't handle it well. It didn't help that browsers never
favored adding it.
On a somewhat (user) hostile network, http://discover.com/ might go to
http://discover.com.example.com/ this probably isn't what the
Tab wrote:
> This is already theoretically addressed by ,
> linking to a well-defined pronunciation file format. Nobody
> implements that, but nobody implements anything new either, of course.
Brett wrote:
> I think it'd be a lot easier for sites, say along the lines of
> Wikipedia, to support in
You could cheat by providing a 0 byte file "folder/nul" and define it
to not be created. On Windows (dos), such a file is used to test for
the existence of a directory, and it's illegal to create a file by
that name.
On 11/15/11, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Kinuko Yasu
>From memory the goal of specing the tag is to define how it's
implemented in the while so that new UAs can read the spec and
implement something compatible with existing UAs, content and servers.
Suggesting anything that isn't what existing UAs does runs counter to
this goal.
On 10/20/11, Martin
>> Comparisons between media types, as defined by MIME specifications, are done
>> in an ASCII case-insensitive manner. [RFC2046]
so, the problem is that your `note` here is ambiguous
it's hard to understand that you're just saying `mime rfc says that
mime comparisons are insensitive`,
v. `this
> Otherwise, if the octets in s starting at pos match any of the sequences of
> octets in the first column of the following table, then the user agent MUST
> follow the steps given in the corresponding cell in the second column of the
> same row. |
What's the stray `|` character at the end of t
There's nothing wrong with the idl specifying apply(DOMString reason);
Reason will be "" for normal applications and "reapply" for reapply cases.
That still gives you a truth value, and it gives something more
meaningful to callees.
On 9/21/11, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
> So the argument is that auth
Partial interface [1] was added for the 12 July 2011 – LCWD. It was
designed to replace "Supplemental" [2]. I think the beginning of it
was in a thread on public-script-coord [3].
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/WebIDL/#dfn-partial-interface
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-WebIDL-20101021/#es-extended-a
Your 13 example is a good argument against splitting between markup
and script. If the minimum value is updated in the html but not the
js, you get confused users. - I've seen the results of letting logic
get out of sync from error reporting, it isn't pretty.
On 7/28/11, Scott González wrote:
> 2
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Shwetank Dixit wrote:
> Just like, just allowing the web app to use the camera as it is will not
> make sense, and presumably, user agents will implement a authorization by
> the user before the app gains access to the camera (something like 'This
> application req
I'd expect a web app to have no idea about device camera
specifications and thus to not be able to properly specify a flash
duration. I don't see how such a thing is valuable.
If a user is in a movie theater, or a museum, it's quite likely they
won't notice a web app is forcing a flash. Let the us
If offering a potentially registerable api is done via
Then it'd be reasonable for a handling page to return some well known
HTTP response (410?) to indicate that the API is no longer supported.
The site wouldn't need to call a method, and the user agent would be
able to do something reasonable
Or we could use a and have the UA only show the option to the
user if it feels like it. The UA could choose not to show it if it's
already active. It could also choose to only show it if the user has
visited repeatedly or whatever.
This is closer to ATOM discovery, but it's also a deployed style.
If you have 100mb of junk, it won't fit in my browser's http cache
either. And that's a good thing, there are other sites I visit that
are more important. However, a browser is within its rights to detect
that its user uses a site so heavily as to justify increasing that
site's cache allocation. Th
On 7/1/11, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> Do any browser vendors agree with this or have objections?
I don't look forward to being blackmailed by sites into me allowing
them to register for X or else I don't get their content.
I have a bank which won't let me bank unless I have Java installed,
not because
It's possible to build a main page so that it can update its content
using a subresource. You can use iframes, javascript (including json),
xmlhttprequests, or other things to do this.
Nothing requires you to have a monolythic main page which is incapable
of dynamically updating itself. ... If I v
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>> Do we have any data on whether these warnings have any useful effect?
>
> I don't, but then, browsers barely ever emit such warnings. So it
> would be worth trying to mark some methods as deprecated in this
> fashion and see if it's useful,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:46 PM, James May wrote:
> Why can't the browser just do the "fullscreen in a window" behaviour
> until/if the user approves?
I don't see anything wrong with this offhand :)
> No need for new events even, although a "fullscreen lost", sourced eg. from
> some browser UI o
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Jer Noble wrote:
> Okay, here's another proposal that should work with Firefox's passive
> permission system:
>
> Proposal:
>
> - Add a new boolean Element property "canRequestFullScreen". This would map
> to Firefox's "Never" permission choice.
> - Add the "fu
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> There is a Unite application for Opera that does this -
> http://unite.opera.com/application/701/
Wow! I'll install it on Sunday (my day ends in a few minutes)
thanks you just made my weekend :)
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> If I understand correctly, I disagree.
:)
> I might trust a given entity
> sometimes, or with some kinds of information, without wanting to simply say
> "sure whatever you want".
And I'm still haunted by web sites which pester me t
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Michael A. Puls II
wrote:
> Besides mailto, these should be white-listed:
>
> mms
> nntp
news
> rtsp
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> We are investigating registerProtocolHandler and have been discussing the
> need for a blacklist of protocols to forbid.
>
> Our list currently includes:
> * http:
> * https:
> * ftp:
> * file:
>
> * about:
> * data:
>
> Email specific scheme
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Are there any other reasons to allow
> This should be rare as annoying and confusing your users typically isn't a
> good business strategy.
Not all strategies involve wanting to keep normal, happy, satisfied customers.
Spammers and other fraudsters seem to be perfectly happy with things
where they capture things like the default sea
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> This is just a thought. Instead of acquiring a Stream object asynchronously
> there always is one available showing transparent black or some such.
:)
> E.g.
> navigator.cameraStream. It also inherits from EventTarget. Then on the
> Str
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Kevin Marks wrote:
> Moving them only within the video viewport is a bug, not a feature.
Of note, the big tv we had in 2000 (probably purchased circa 1998) at
a college communal area would display captions for the PIP window
below the PIP. So even TV vendors were
2011/2/15 Leandro Graciá Gil :
> Given the above case, we don't think that the lifetime of the Stream objects
> should be controlled exclusively by the Web application. We think that the
> specification should state "the UA must allow the user to explicitly revoke
> access". The API should then be
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> I don't think so. If there is any parse or compilation or whatever you want
> to call it error, the script is never executed, so window.x is never
> defined.
oops, right, but i don't know that that complicates things much. you
just store a
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Alexandre Morgaut
wrote:
> Another approach:
> The link tag is meant to support a "prefetch" value for the "rel" attribute
> asking to preemptively cache the resource:
> - http://blog.whatwg.org/the-road-to-html-5-link-relations#rel-prefetch
> - http://davidwalsh
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> - The "scripts in comments" hack would be unneeded. That's an unpleasant
> hack, because it will both prevent browsers from caching compiled scripts,
> and prevent scripts from being compiled in the background. Specifying a
> bogus file type
Would it be possible to configure the list serv to bounce messages of the form:
/.*: whatwg Digest/
Most of us [1] simply reply to the message we get, not paying much
attention to the summary. (Some do fix the Subject, and there's one
kind soul who is fighting to improve our habits.)
I'm reading
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> * If your cert expires or you misconfigure the site something else
> goes wrong, all your users get scary error messages.
This isn't limited to SNI. I saw one server which had its certificate
expire at the end of Dec 30, 2010 (i.e. it was expi
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:54 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> * You can typically only serve one domain per IP address, unless you
> can set up SNI (do all browsers support that yet?).
[1] Browsers with support for TLS server name indication:
* Internet Explorer 7 (Vista or higher, not XP) or later
* Moz
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Markus Ernst wrote:
>> Would search engines benefit from markup for this?
>
> They could actually benefit, if the correct spelling would be added in an
> attribute, so they could match the misspelled word with a correctly spelled
> search term; somehow like:
> chus
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> Why wouldn't you suspend the process (i.e. put it to sleep by stopping it).
because the server may kill you when the network socket times out or
breaks. why should it waste resources on a non responsive client?
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Bjartur Thorlacius
wrote:
> On 12/31/10, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> Please don't use all my memory for your Web-based game. :-) I may just be
>> running it in the background while finding a video to watch, for example,
>> in which case I really don't want the game usin
i'm not sure i'm a fan.
>From work on the nokia n8x0/n900, we wanted to be able to stop things
when the screen blanked.
During this case the "active tab" was still the "active tab", but
since the screen was blanked, the user couldn't see it.
That said, if a video is offscreen, partially offscree
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> Currently, Firefox and Safari output image/jpeg in a way that differs
> from
> the spec:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11431
>> is there a reason you haven't found/filed bugs in
>> bugzilla.mozilla.org/bugs.webkit.org?
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> Currently, Firefox and Safari output image/jpeg in a way that differs from
> the spec:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11431
is there a reason you haven't found/filed bugs in
bugzilla.mozilla.org/bugs.webkit.org?
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:18 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> These can also be done with data:text/html,... and maybe
> . It is slightly longer, but not much.
Sure, play the canvas card. I could just as easily respond to
everything by saying "you don't need layout rules, you could just
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> Oh, the other thing that JavaScript can do that data: can't do is trade off
> url length for CPU time. A data: URI to write out the first 3000 Fibonacci
> numbers would be a lot longer than the equivalent javascript: URI. Again,
> one would
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Simon Pieters wrote:
> How about code="" (or )?
i'm assuming not, the spec claims it's not allowed to take an absolute url.
http://download.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/guide/misc/applet.html
actually, potentially each of these are probably potential candidates
for something:
CODEBASE
ARCHIVE
OBJECT
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>> Also, note that and > something="javascript:"> (can't recall the attr name right now) also execute
>> the script in Firefox. Do they in Opera?
>
> Neither of these execute in Opera, both were explicitly blocked before I
> started look
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> A method for triggering a system/ua spell check via execCommand
> would be a small step forward. Is that something already available?
> Afaik, it was canned from the early MS model.
Bringing up system dialogs is scary/surprising and co
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> But why would a password field ever be tied to a contentEditable section?
I did not say that was the source of
password data that was learned by the spell checker.
I said that a spell checker could learn passwords. In fact on the
platfo
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> Is there room for discussion of an API
there's room to discuss such things.
> to expose misspelled ranges of text in contentEditable?
I'm worried about privacy risks.
Some devices have a tendency to learn passwords as typed words, ot
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Ingo Chao wrote:
> The mashup combines components, some of them are not under my control.
> The advertisement service provides 3rd party ads, they will change
> often.
> Including the ad service means that I never know if and when
> someone throws in http content
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Ingo Chao wrote:
> For automated error reporting, say for a HTTPS mashup page with 3rd
> party advertisement content, I would like to have a security warning
> thrown for the mixed content situation (HTTPS mixed with HTTP
> content), accessible from JavaScript.
>
> Interesting. I'm pretty sure I've seen pages that would break as a
> result... I guess we'll see when a browser tries to do that.
from memory, microb did things like this, and it did break sites :).
such breakage is unfortunate, and the lack of flexibility/ability for
browser vendors to innov
Ashley wrote:
> set one in onchange
>
> That's a javascript event, and shouldn't be relied upon for this sort of
> thing really.
And my useragent is allowed to send arbitrary data to your server. you
*must* deal with it.
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:31 AM, TAMURA, Kent wrote:
> A team in Google tried to use for a product, and they
> decided
> not to use it.
> What they needed was a control to select an integer from a specific integer
> range
> such as 1 - 16. The number type control in Opera and WebKit allow a user
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Chris Pearce wrote:
> Unless there's a good reason not to, and since most browsers have
> implemented autoplay when not in a document anyway, perhaps we should update
> the spec to match the implemented behaviour?
Accessibility tools only have access to the docume
On 9/28/10, Rob Evans wrote:
> All good points. I think as we have moved away from simple web pages and
> really start to think about applications that are coded in js, many things
> previously the exclusive domain of desktop apps are more and more desirable
> for web apps.
Unfortunately, moving
tl;dr of my previous post: it's impossible to know how much memory is
available in the future.
How much memory you're currently using is something that /could/
probably be provided in the near future. *However*, there might be a
concern that this could be abused by attackers trying to figure out
i
what exactly do you intend to do if you get such a signal?
In general, this is mostly a user problem. There are two basic cases:
1. user has one constrained device with one browser accessing a single
web site (yours) with no other open applications.
2. user has a device with multiple open windows
On 9/24/10, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 9/23/10 6:12 PM, Mounir Lamouri wrote:
>> So, to improve the user experience while using web forms we would like
>> to fix that. However, we are wondering if :invalid (and :valid?)
>> specifications should be updated to take UX considerations or if a new
>> ps
no.
it is not ok to allow content authors to refuse to deliver content
unless they are "full screen".
having events which enable providers to hold users hostage is a bad thing.
if i have two screens today and try to watch a youtube video "full
screen" (with flash), it tries to unfullscreen when
On 8/24/10, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> How often do captions distinguish two or more speakers in the same cue by
> styling them differently? In my experience, translation subtitles for TV,
> DVDs and theatrical movies virtually never do (but it's assumed that the
> reader of the subtitles can work out
On 8/31/10, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Ryosuke Niwa wrote:
>> But there are users who don't know how to convert from "¾¼ÏÂxxǯ" to
>> year 19xx (like my parents and grandparents who has to spend at least
>> half a minute recalling their birth years in Gregorian calendar), and
>> onl
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Are there examples of sites working around the lack of this feature on the
> Web today, e.g. using Flash or some such?
Nordic banking sites use java for authorization, that's just for pins
(imo it's stupid).
http://news.cnet.com/UPS-signature
data:text/html,%3Cstyle%3Ebr%20,%20b%20{display:inline;%20content:%22x%22}b:after,br:after{content:%22%20|%20%22}%20%3C/style%3Ea%3Cbr%3Eb%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3Ec
So, in Safari, the above actually lets me replace w/ whatever I like.
bz indicates that I can't do that in Gecko because is a replaced somet
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Thomas Koetter
wrote:
> Disclaimer: I'm new to this discussion list, so please excuse me if this
> topic has been discussed before. A quick search didn't turn up anything
> though.
If you haven't taken the time to read the FAQ in its entirety, I'd
suggest that yo
People should probably consider reading the Web Apps Widgets working
group archives (they're public) about widget packaging.
There are long discussions about zip and gzip, etc.
http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#zip-archive
Especially http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#character-sets covers character sets
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:18 AM, James May wrote:
> On Windows at least, when put a URL in the open dialog the shell
> downloads it then passes a temporary file. The browser never gets the
> source URL - so it'd be difficult without re-implementing the dialog
> (undesirable). Plus user control, an
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Nicholas Zakas wrote:
> setter creator void setItem(in DOMString key, in any data, [Optional] in
> unsigned long ttl);
> * If a TTL was previously set, and another call is made to setItem() that
> contains an invalid TTL (<= 0), then the original TTL remains.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Mounir Lamouri
wrote:
> I suppose, like @required, as long as it doesn't break too many
> websites, we can count on evangelism teams and user feedbacks to fix
> there websites.
Excuse me, but I've watched Evangelism struggle and fail for 10 years.
There are a nu
Specifically: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Jul/0120.html
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:00:41 +0200, Chris Double
wrote:
> You'll probably get different responses depending on who in Mozilla
> responds. For example, I prefer option (1) and am against content
> sniffing. Other's at Mozilla disagree I'm sure.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Philip Jägenstedt w
port image/svg+xml today none support application/svg+xml.
However, as Safari supports application/pdf, the cat's out of the bag
on non image/ mime types.
http://www.webwizardry.net/~timeless/svg/276431.html
> All of the image formats that you are pointing out have an image mime
> type.
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 5:26 AM, silviapfeiffer1
wrote:
> It doesn't actually matter what element the URI appears in - your
> element has to deal with the data that it receives and if
> "file.ogv#t=1:00,1:15" is an Ogg Theora segment out of a video, then
> that is what the element receives.
right
2010/7/3 André Luís :
> (alt-option 1) Trying to step away from the solution presented, I can
> only imagine something along the lines of different src attributes for
> different resolutions:
>
>
>
used to exist:
http://www.htmlcodetutorial.com/images/_IMG_LOWSRC.html
it's mostly gone now.
I
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> This latter one is already defined as a 5 sec video extract from the
> full file.ogv - it's not possible to overload that with turning the
> byte range into an animated gif.
So, isn't restricted to animated GIFs, Mozilla supports animated
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Ben Vanik wrote:
> An API like this would be great for WebGL-related content too. Doing the
> canvas + HTML/CSS UI in fullscreen plus the ability to get keyboard input
> would allow for native-like games to be built. You’d also get a predictable
> way on mobile dev
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:38 AM, David Singer wrote:
> I am a little concerned that we are increasingly breaking down a metaphor,
> a 'virtual interface' without realizing what that abstraction buys us.
I'm more than a little concerned about this and hope that we tread
much more carefully than i
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:37 AM, JustFillBug wrote:
> How about cloud computing? Gimp or CorelDraw like applications. There
> are already bitmap and vector editors in html5 using javascript. A user
> should be allowed to make use of the large amount of fonts site on his
> hard disk. Especially de
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Perry Smith wrote:
> I see places that explicitly state that the same object is returned on some
> operations. For example, the element.style has that clause.
>
> I have not found in either html5 or the DOM documentation that is referenced
> an explicit statemen
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Perry Smith wrote:
> If we have a site like official_site.area_subdomain.big.com which relaxes the
> restriction to area_subdomain.big.com, it is now exposed to the potential of
> an attack from any of the systems within the same area_subdomain including
> laptops
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Garrett Smith wrote:
> | # a date-fullyear is defined as four or more digits
> | representing a number greater than 0
>
> I read that as "" to "". Is there a different interpretation of that?
Surely is not greater than 0?
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> 3) Currently autofill for usernames looks for something like
> id="username" or name="username". However on certain websites this
> fails.
Why would a site which doesn't cooperate with today's autofill
features choose to cooperate with your pr
I should have posted onlist.
MS's crime here was in trying to document netscape's extension:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc249768(PROT.13).aspx
Adrian wrote:
> But they often have a similar concept anyway - the iPhone for example might
> let the user select an album of images to upload rather than a folder.
The platforms I have in mind doesn't seem to have such a concept at all.
fwiw, some platforms don't intend to support exposing "folders" to
users at all...
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Garrett Smith wrote:
>> we had a "manager" who insisted on a "feature" where the browser would
>> move focus to the urlbar in certain cases.
> Why is the manager making decisions about U/X?
managers are managers, when engineers tell them they're wrong, they're
in
fwiw, w/ the mobile browsers i work w/, random focus changes are
incredibly annoying.
we had a "manager" who insisted on a "feature" where the browser would
move focus to the urlbar in certain cases.
as a result users often have text they're typing spread across at
least two input areas.
needles
0-9, *, #, p, w
http://www.wikihow.com/Add-Pauses-to-a-Phone-Number
recognizing the difference between a 'P' and a 'p' (or a 'W' and a
'w') is moderately painful.
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Roger Hågensen wrote:
> Outch! But that's just SVG then right? In which case the SVG specs probably
> states a "different" minimum requirement on top of the HTML one? (haven't
> checked)
'just SVG'? you realize that in addition to or or
you can now have SVG in
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:37 AM, wrote:
> I personally would like to see a cross-browser way to invoke a
> copy-to-clipboard command without using any drag-and-drop APIs. I understand
> access to the clipboard is sensitive.
>
> I call for user agents to respond to a JavaScript method that take
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> In practice, IE doesn't reliably recover from this class of authoring error,
> so it's fair to believe that the Web doesn't depend on browsers recovering
> from this situation. So far, I haven't seen bug reports about this HTML5
> behavior
David Singer wrote:
> I am by no means convinced that automatic selection of sources other
> than that based on the most obvious, automated, criteria, is wise or
> needed. We have had for many years, in QuickTime, this facility, and
> quite a few sites opted not to use it and allow the user a manu
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Browsers could solve the editor use case by treating "close tab" as
> "hide tab" for a minute or two before actually shutting down the page.
Firefox today has undo close tab. And people have joked for years
about undo quit application (I think
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:50 AM, ben turner wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm implementing the structured clone algorithm and this part bothers
> me a little bit:
>
> - If input is a host object (e.g. a DOM node)
> Return the null value.
>
> Seems like this has the potential to confuse web programm
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Jose Fandos wrote:
> Er... sure. It is not as convenient for certain web apps when compared to
> desktop apps. With this supported, the gap get's reduced.
Adding support for tar (and all of its variations) involves adding
extra code, testing, etc. to browsers. Thi
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Jose Fandos wrote:
>> Most operating systems have built-in features to read into these files as if
>> they weren't archives at all.
> Agreed, but it only goes so far. Mac OS doesn't, not natively, as far as I
> can see.
http://www.glyphnotes.com/gn-zip.cfm
OS
2010/3/8 Sir Gallantmon (ニール・ゴンパ)
> I don't know if I completely agree with that. If that were the case, people
> would have done it with Flash years ago. Flash can be started in full screen
> mode, and yet nobody's done it
I know that the Adobe Flash team has worked very hard to provide hi
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 4:53 AM, will surgent wrote:
> It would be nice if there was a copyright attribute for the HTML 5 img tag.
> This would make it easy for users and search engines to filter out images
> that can not be used for certain purposes.
external metadata on copyright is a disaster.
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Olli Pettay wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> currently
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/timers.html#printing
> says that window.print() should prompt user to print the page, but that "For
> instance, a kiosk browser could silently ignore any invoc
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
