On 9 December 2013 06:06, Stevie Benton wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Please see the below short statement from Wikimedia UK.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> Stevie
>
>
> Wikimedia UK today announces that Michael Maggs has been elected as the
> new Chair of the charity, succeeding Chris Keating. Chris
On 17 November 2013 12:10, Michael Maggs wrote:
> Wikimedia UK is pleased to be able to announce today the appointment to
> the board of three new trustees: Joseph Seddon, Simon Knight and Padmini
> Ray Murray.
>
Congratulations, all three of you; welcome!
J.
--
James D. Forrester
jdforres...@
An 22 August 2012 12:14, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> Sending this again because it went off-list by accident. Anyone know
> why Tom's email didn't have a reply-to header?
Yes; as part of the changes we made to the list last week, we set it
so that "reply" will by default only reply to the sender, and
All,
Over the past few months a number of individuals have asked for some,
many, or all e-mails they have written to be removed from the
archives. In general, our answer has been a holding 'no', but the
mailing list's archives were nevertheless temporarily hidden from
view. This was unsatisfactory
On 1 July 2012 13:00, Tom Morris wrote:
> None of which will matter if the law is so broadly drawn that
> Wikimedia UK or even an individual Wikimedian could be held to be an
> operator of a telecommunications system.
It's entirely foreseeable that UK police would consider anyone with
'higher' ri
On Thursday, June 7, 2012, Gordon Joly wrote:
> On 07/06/12 10:42, Roger Bamkin wrote:
>
>
> *Wikimeets* - We are not Wikimedia London (although they did well as well)
>
>
>
> It will not be the same without James F
>
> BTW, have we decided if he is a spy? And for which side?
>
> :-)
>
I con
On 12 May 2012 22:44, Thomas Morton wrote:
> What membership email list
Gordon wants to trigger a CiviCRM all-current-members mass e-mail to
update all Members of the Charity (i.e., trigger the
no-you-can't-really-unsubscribe list).
James has said it'll be done when Richard gets back to the
On 11 May 2012 18:54, Tom Holden wrote:
> Should we have had confirmation of our proxy votes? I've emailed mine twice
> (the second time following the reminder email) and received nothing.
I believe that the Tellers are going to get back to everyone to
confirm today. If you've not heard back by 2
On 5 May 2012 17:23, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> It is clear that a lot of people want to come but can't make the
> proposed date. I've created a doodle poll here for people to specify
> what dates they can make so we can find a date and time that best
> suits everyone:
>
> http://www.doodle.com/8h62aa
Please see the below if of interest to you UK-based Wikimedians.
J.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Barry Newstead
Date: 9 April 2012 20:10
Subject: [Internal-l] Fwd: Volunteers Wanted: Funds Dissemination
Process Advisory Group
To: "Local Chapters, board and officers coordination
On 17 February 2012 17:58, Roger Bamkin wrote:
> Ive been persuaded to go to this event. I think this will work out well as
> I'm keen to see a fresh look at WLM which you guys should be able to find.
> Fae will be there to represent the board and I know James F will also be
> there.
Much as Roge
On 25 January 2012 19:18, Magnus Manske wrote:
> ...photos that somehow look similar:
>
> http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/photographers_face_copyright_threat_after_shock_ruling__news_311191.html
Good heavens. That's bonkers; there's possibly a trademark argument,
but copyright?!
> The
For those not on foundation-l - ChapCom is hugely important in how the
movement as a whole operates, and it might be of interest to some of
the readers of this list.
J.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bence Damokos
Date: 21 January 2012 20:25
Subject: [Wikimedia Announcements] Cha
On 14 January 2012 22:39, Michael Peel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm currently putting together a proposal for purchasing tech equipment to
> support future events/activities at:
> http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/2012_Event_Tech
> Input on this would be very welcome - please edit the page directly, or le
On 9 December 2011 19:36, HJ Mitchell wrote:
> This is basically what we've been doing with the Girl Geeks. I'd be more
> than happy to help out. If possible, it would be good to put it in a
> location that's easiest to get to for most of the 'customers'. Or perhaps
> holding several and making su
And me. So... done: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meetup/London/53
On 29 November 2011 18:23, Thomas Dalton wrote:
> That makes sense to me.
>
> On 29 November 2011 17:54, Tom Morris wrote:
>> Any thoughts on running the London Wikimeet on January the 15th rather
>> than January the 8th.
>>
>>
On 6 October 2011 07:31, Richard Symonds wrote:
> Small point of order though: I was of the understanding that OGL is not quite
> compatible with CC-BY - AFAIK, it's something to do with database rights. I'm
> not an expert on this, though, and am happy to be corrected.
IANAL, but I did work with
On 12 September 2011 21:08, Richard Symonds wrote:
> Something that’d encourage people
> to upload to commons would be good though – I did get a WM Commons Christmas
> card last year from Mr Forrester! Postcards would be cheap, easy to make,
> and we’ve got some wonderful pictures. But would they
On 13 September 2011 08:49, Gordon Joly wrote:
> On 12/09/2011 17:00, Richard Symonds wrote:
>
>> I'm just asking for ideas for merchandise to take to events - not for sale.
>
> Ah. That word "merchandise". what you would expect to be connected
> with a merchant?
Yeah - this is more schwag th
On 5 September 2011 09:12, Gordon Joly wrote:
> I humbly assert that this process (many Wikipedians, face to face, in a
> pub in London) breaks any modern standards of the selection process
> (e.g. all candidates being asked the same set of questions).
Well, the way I see it it's more that it's a
On 1 September 2011 08:55, Chris Keating wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Please join me in welcoming Richard Symonds as our Office
> Administrator, starting today. You may well already know Richard as an
> extremely experienced and committed Wikipedian under the name
> User:Chase me ladies I'm the cavalry
On 20 August 2011 08:20, Lewis Cawte wrote:
> On 20/08/11 01:01, WereSpielChequers wrote:
> > As Brighton is rather close to London can I suggest that we try and avoid
> > having this clash with the London meetup? That still leaves you the 1st, 3rd
> > and 4th weekends of the month.
> > WSC
>
> I
On 2 July 2011 10:24, Michael Peel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to figure out where the best place to do the online organisation of
> wikimeets is. I can think of four different places, each with pros and cons,
> which I'd appreciate others' views on.
[Snip]
> 3) Wikimedia UK wiki
>
> Pros: E
On 16 May 2011 21:51, Lewis Cawte wrote:
> I don't know, I'm 14, (15 in September), I live in Brighton, so it
> wouldn't be too hard to get there, but the idea of getting lost in
> London by myself scares me, and going unaccompanied into the pub (the
> regular venue I believe)... I guess I like th
On 20 April 2011 17:59, Chris McKenna wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, David Gerard wrote:
>> (Sam Korn was on the en:wp arbcom at 16 ...)
>
> Getting off topic (sorry), but I've just been looking up age limits and
> things and in the most recent elections candidates were required to be at
> least 18
On 20 April 2011 18:04, Isabell Long wrote:
> Suggestions as to how I can get more involved are welcome! I do plan to
> come to one of the London meetups *soon*. :-)
Though I'd be the last to discourage people from coming to the meetups
(and especially "my" meetups in London), they are primaril
On 20 April 2011 16:11, Gordon Joly wrote:
> On 20/04/2011 13:06, steve virgin wrote:
>
> > PS: I am white and middle aged so am guilty as charged!!!
>
> So far so good. Here is a list
>
> 1) Gender
> 2) Ethnicity
> 3) Age
> 4) Religion
> 5) Disability
> 6) Sexual orientation
Before coming u
On 22 June 2010 17:25, Cary Bass wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Is anyone interested in my doing a Facebook event page for the London
> meetup on July 4?
>
> I've done this for San Francisco with some success, and have recently
> created pages for the DC and Montréal
2009/8/24 Gordon Joly :
> At 12:46 -0400 24/8/09, James Forrester wrote:
>>2009/8/24 Gordon Joly :
>>> Line James up for Poland next year?
>>
>>Well, I'd like to think that the Board will ensure at least one
>>(ideally all) of them attend Wikimania when
2009/8/24 Gordon Joly :
> Line James up for Poland next year?
Well, I'd like to think that the Board will ensure at least one
(ideally all) of them attend Wikimania when it's on the same
continent! :-)
As to being an observer, happy to help out, but I'm not sure how
useful it will be when I'm not
All,
I'm in Buenos Aires for the Wikimania conference in a few days, and
was wondering if there are any Wikimedia UK-related people around. I'm
getting asked questions and invited to things as if I can talk
'officially' for the chapter (which of course I cannot).
Is there going to be someone here
2009/8/11 Thomas Dalton :
> 2009/8/11 geni :
>> 2009/8/10 Michael Peel :
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Anyone interested in the below? As I understand it, they want to
>>> cover the range of philosophies on Wikipedia - they already have
>>> people involved with an inclusionist or middle-ist point of view, bu
2009/4/28 David Gerard :
> Has James sent a Phorm opt-out email for wikimedia.org.uk yet? I ask
> because wm.de and wm.fr have just opted out too.
>
> The canonical web address is now http://uk.wikimedia.org , but opting
> out provides a nice public message. For publicity purposes, I'd
> suggest th
2009/3/3 AndrewRT :
> The Board has an action to register with the Charity Commission as
> soon as it's likely that our income will be more than £5,000 - which
> will be as soon were announced as the winning bid for Wikimania 2010 (-
> grin-), or, failing that, when our donations get to that level
2008/12/14 Thomas Dalton :
> 2008/12/14 David Gerard :
>> 2008/12/14 AndrewRT :
>>
>>> There are advantages in having in person meetings as well, though - it
>>> gives us an opportunity to discuss things more informally and get to
>>> know each other more that you can with an online meeting.
>>
>>
35 matches
Mail list logo