Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-09 Thread Jack Unger
at engineer level, and I'm not sure that all the FCC personell have been even asked all the questions, yet, that us creative types can dream up. - Original Message - From: "Jack Unger" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Monday,

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-09 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
Sh Don't tell the good secrets Mike! marlon - Original Message - From: "Mike Hammett" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 2:22 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > Your statement confuses me. > > Yes, there are EIRP maximums,

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-09 Thread Mike Hammett
PA General List'" Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > EIRP is equivalent in measurements... > > John Rock > Director of Operations - Senior Engineer > Wireless Connections > 166 Milan Ave., Norwalk, Oh. 44857 > ACCessing the Future Today!! > ofc. 419.660.6100 > cell 4

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-09 Thread Mike Hammett
I'm sure some on this list would call you quite creative. ;-) - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- From: Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:01 PM To: "WISPA General List" Subject: Re: [WISPA]

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-09 Thread reader
ot sure that all the FCC personell have been even asked all the questions, yet, that us creative types can dream up. - Original Message - From: "Jack Unger" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 1:48 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-09 Thread Matt Liotta
; enclosure used, and followed the rest of the requirements as best I >> could. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Original Message ----- >> From: "Scott Carullo" >> To: "WISPA General Lis

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-09 Thread Jack Unger
enclosure used, and followed the rest of the requirements as best I could. - Original Message - From: "Scott Carullo" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:47 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp Wh

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-09 Thread reader
: "Scott Carullo" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 5:47 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > Who has the final word on this? I've been told by testing laboratories > that do testing for the FCC that this is not the case... They said if the

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-09 Thread reader
r for sure.It reads almost like prepared stuff, as if someone's out to deliberately spread misinformation. - Original Message - From: "Mike Hammett" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 2:45 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-08 Thread John Rock
: Saturday, March 07, 2009 4:48 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp Lower your transmit power, duh. You go a hell of a lot further with a 0 db radio and 36 db of antenna than 30 db of radio and 6 db of antenna. That do you think negative db values are for? - Mike Hammett

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-08 Thread Anthony Will
months ago > > Bob > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -Original Message- > From: "Scott Carullo" > > Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:47:42 > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > > > Who has the final word on this? I

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-07 Thread eje
8 Mar 2009 00:52:36 To: ; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp As per the FCC only the anufacturer can make the determination which antenna is similar in specifications. Otherwise it needs FCC certification as a system. That was from the horses mouth about 18 months ago Bob Se

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-07 Thread lakeland
Scott Carullo" Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:47:42 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp Who has the final word on this? I've been told by testing laboratories that do testing for the FCC that this is not the case... They said if the radio card (5Ghz when I asked but for

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-07 Thread Scott Carullo
the people at the top of the food chain I guess. Who's right? And how am I supposed to know? Scott Carullo Brevard Wireless 321-205-1100 x102 Original Message > From: "Harold Bledsoe" > Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 2:21 PM > To: "WISPA Ge

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-07 Thread Mike Hammett
-- From: "Matt Hardy" Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 7:41 AM To: "WISPA General List" Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > Yes for the 3.65GHz band, antenna gain does matter, because the band is > EIRP restricted. For instance, for the XR3, if you lo

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-07 Thread Mike Hammett
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 12:36 AM To: "WISPA General List" Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > Antenna gain does matter. > > UBNT has only one certified antenna combination - or did back when I first > filed for the license. Useful only for P2P, actually. > > You

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-07 Thread Harold Bledsoe
es Part 15 even matter? Simply put, P-90 covers the transmitter, P-15 covers the rest of the crap spewing from the device in the rest of the spectrum. :-) -Hal -Original Message- From: David E. Smith Reply-To: WISPA General List To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp Date: S

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-07 Thread David E. Smith
> My system is fully licensed.How did you get your combination of "XR3 + > Routerboard 400 series + Mikrotik RouterOS 3.x + whatever antenna" certified? > What's the process like, and how much did it cost?Or did you just buy the kit > from someone else who went through the certification process?

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-07 Thread Matt Hardy
#x27;s grant details, using the antenna > specified. > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Mike Hammett" > To: "WISPA General List" > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:38 PM > Subjec

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-06 Thread reader
ified. - Original Message - From: "Mike Hammett" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:38 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > Not mine, but > > http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/licenseLocDetail.jsp?keyLoc=15533393&licKey=2969764&rsc

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-06 Thread reader
Ok, smart alec. Call sign: WQJC592 It's all there in black and white. - Original Message - From: "John Scrivner" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:17 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp >I did

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-06 Thread reader
occurred about 8-10 months ago. - Original Message - From: "John Scrivner" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 6:34 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > So Reader, are you saying you have a 3.65 GHz license

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-06 Thread Mike Hammett
t Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- From: "John Scrivner" Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:34 PM To: "WISPA General List" Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > So Reader, are you saying you have a 3.65 GHz lice

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-06 Thread John Scrivner
gt; > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message - > From: "Brian Rohrbacher" > To: "Conversations over a new WISP Trade Organization" > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 7:29 AM > Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > >

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-06 Thread Travis Johnson
a new WISP Trade Organization" Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 7:29 AM Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp Anyone using 3.65 for ptp?   What is available?  Can ubiquiti's cards be used in mikrotik? brian --

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-06 Thread John Scrivner
Have they managed to get the FCC to release the full 50 MHz channel space for this product yet? Scriv On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Matt Liotta wrote: > We've been using the AN80 3.65 PtP with great success. > > -Matt > > On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Brian Rohrbacher wrote: > >> Anyone using

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-06 Thread John Scrivner
> > Or, that's how it seems. > > > > > > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Brian Rohrbacher" > To: "Conversations over a new WISP Trade Organization" > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 7:29 AM > Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > > >

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-03 Thread Matt Liotta
We've been using the AN80 3.65 PtP with great success. -Matt On Mar 3, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Brian Rohrbacher wrote: > Anyone using 3.65 for ptp? What is available? Can ubiquiti's > cards be > used in mikrotik? > > brian > > > ---

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-03 Thread Mike Hammett
de Organization" Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > Anyone using 3.65 for ptp? What is available? Can ubiquiti's cards be > used in mikrotik? > > brian > > > > WISPA

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-03 Thread reader
;s how it seems. - Original Message - From: "Brian Rohrbacher" To: "Conversations over a new WISP Trade Organization" Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 7:29 AM Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > Anyone using 3.65 for ptp? What is available? Can ubiquiti&#x

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-03 Thread 3-dB Networks
rsations over a new WISP Trade Organization >Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp > >Anyone using 3.65 for ptp? What is available? Can ubiquiti's cards be >used in mikrotik? > >brian > > >---

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-03 Thread Josh Luthman
Look at the very bottom table - it mentions xr3 confirming Ubnt knows it works with MT. http://www.ubnt.com/downloads/ubi_mtik_power.pdf Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, po

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-03 Thread Mike Goicoechea
: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp Anyone using 3.65 for ptp? What is available? Can ubiquiti's cards be used in mikrotik? brian WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wisp

Re: [WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-03 Thread Josh Luthman
This guy says he is using them but having problems - didn't read into anything more then "411 board and xr3" http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=29063&p=145580&hilit=xr3#p145580 Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 Those who don

[WISPA] 3.65 ptp

2009-03-03 Thread Brian Rohrbacher
Anyone using 3.65 for ptp? What is available? Can ubiquiti's cards be used in mikrotik? brian WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ---