ehalf Of Tom DeReggiSent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:52
PMTo: WISPA General ListSubject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
Dustin,
You have showed
how using both Pols, can reduce the sensitivity requirements of the radio,
able to extend link distance, and likely
Charles Wu wrote:
Can you please explain how this is applicable in modern-day implementations
of TCP? From my limited understanding, Nagle is a relic of the past (been
replaced by TCP Westwood, etc)
Nagle is very old circa 1984 I believe, but it hasn't really be
replaced. Many folks would
Hi Matt,
To answer your questions from my relatively "limited" sales & marketing
point of view
>RFC 2018 SACK
Yes it is enabled -- if you purchase a copy of our report, it shows the
exact system parameters configured on the box (basically, >sysctl -a | grep
tcp)
>RFC 896 Nagle
Can you please e
less Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Dustin Jurman
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 6:47 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles you make a good point, but
I’m going to throw a “but” in here:
but the Orthogon /
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 6:47
PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
Charles you make a
good point, but Im going to throw a but in here:
but the
Orthogon / Canopy 300 radios will run also run at:
64 QAM
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles Wu wrote:
In an attenuated lab setup, running TCP (w/ Iperf), we see the
following results with the Spectra
20, 2006 1:56 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
We are running FreeBSD boxes w/ Gigabit Ethernet NICs
I don't know all the details, since I'm not the technical guy running the
tests, but I believe we are using "standard" 1500
ent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles Wu wrote:
> In an attenuated lab setup, running TCP (w/ Iperf), we see the
> following results with the Spectra @ the 300 Mbps data rate
>
>
>
> 1 Way TCP Max
Charles Wu wrote:
In an attenuated lab setup, running TCP (w/ Iperf), we see the
following results with the Spectra @ the 300 Mbps data rate
1 Way TCP Max: 143 Mbps
2 Way BiDirectional TCP Max: 98.1 / 105 Mbps
What TCP settings did you use to achieve the above?
-Matt
--
WISPA Wireles
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin
JurmanSent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 5:47 PMTo: 'WISPA
General List'Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
Dustin
Jurman
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles WuSen
day, March 19, 2006 6:10 PMTo:
WISPA General ListSubject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
Tom DeReggiRapidDSL & Wireless, IncIntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
--
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of G.Villarini
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 7:54 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles,
I
ISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles,
Ill chime in here cause you can get a Spectra for $15 to $16k wheras a
Licensed link goes from $20k and up...
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.273.4143
List' <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
*Sent:* Saturday, March 18, 2006 5:25 PM
*Subject:* RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
The Spectra would be around $20k with external antennas. A
licensed product is going to be at least that, and probably $5k more.
Sit bac
ntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 5:25
PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
>The
Spectra would be around $20k with external antennas. A
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Charles Wu
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006
5:26 PM
To: 'WISPA
General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed
Backhaul options
>The Spectra would be around $20k with external
antennas. A licensed product is going t
--
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 10:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul op
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
G.VillariniSent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 6:14 AMTo:
'WISPA General List'Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
Tad less … wit 2
footers about $17k
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband
Corp
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of G.Villarini
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 7:54 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles,
Ill chime in here cause you
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
A Trango sales person mentioned to me that they were thinking about
offering a licensed product. If the price is like the res
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed
Backhaul options
The Spectra would be around $20k with external
antennas. A licensed product is going to be at least that, and probably $5k
more.
Travis
Microserv
Charles Wu wrote:
You don't need licensed to high throughput backhaul. For ex
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
-Matt
Bobby Burrow wrote:
I'm looking at moving to a licensed solution to increase throughput
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:46 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
You don't need licensed to high throughput backhaul. For example,
Orthogon's Spectra provides 300Mbps aggregate at a price point
neral List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
You don't need licensed to high throughput backhaul. For example,
Orthogon's Spectra provides 300Mbps aggregate at a price point generally
Less than 45Mbps licensed.
Hi Matt,
I am curious to see where / what you g
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:46 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
>You don't need licensed to high throughput backhaul. For example,
>Orthogon's Spectra provides 300Mbps aggregate at a price point ge
I'm looking at moving to a licensed solution to increase throughput across
one of out backhaul links that spans 5 hops. Distances between hops range
anywhere from 7 to 19 miles.
Can anyone recommend a licensed radio manufacturer that should net us
50Mb-100Mb per hop?
Hi Bobby,
>From reading yo
Spectra?
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backha
harris
dragonwave (we've got that at EC)
stratex
microwave networks (???)
ceragon
And there's always google:
http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=licensed+microwave
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Cons
You don't need licensed to high throughput backhaul. For example,
Orthogon's Spectra provides 300Mbps aggregate at a price point generally
less than 45Mbps licensed.
-Matt
Bobby Burrow wrote:
I'm looking at moving to a licensed solution to increase throughput across
one of out backhaul links
30 matches
Mail list logo
