i agree that using the same color for the links and the headlines is
confusing ( i tried to click on the headline when i saw the "read more" link)
when clicking on a link in the drop-down menu for the first time the links
slide a bit (a few pixels) to left; looks like you have to re-look your cs
ok, so I'm so not a blogger! But my first attempt - a very brief rundown
of the Wellington meeting - is here:
http://discuss.webstandardsgroup.org/archives/18.htm
It was a great meeting. We had close to 40 show up and there's a lot of
interest in the group and getting it working well next ye
No, you do not have to declare the body font size again.
Relative font sizes are relative to the parent element. In your case
is the parent of #side-bar. And so your sidebar text will be
0.9ems of 85% of the browsers default text.
CSS rules are applied one after the other as they appear in the
Hi everyone
Could someone please enlighten me.
I have a situation where I have 5 style sheets imported by a main style
sheet (it was getting way too complicated so I decided to split of specific
areas into their own stylesheet)
In my main style sheet I have set my font in the body tag, e.g. 85%
Why do you let 8-year-old browser to stop you from making good pages?
I bet that 90% of Netscape 4 users are bored webmasters ;)
Whenever some good solution is mentioned hearing "but Netscape 4 doesn't
support this" is unavoidable.
I agree that webpages should be accessible to all - they should
thanks Patrick that'll teach me for just stopping and going
"doh..what are they talking about!!"
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Jackie Reid wrote:
> The commission responded:
> "Wrapping in each cell can be met by using a simple device namely the
> inclusion of an invisible end-of-cell character whi
Jackie Reid wrote:
> The commission responded:
> "Wrapping in each cell can be met by using a simple device namely the
> inclusion of an invisible end-of-cell character which would indicate to
> a blind person the end of the text in each cell."
>
> They then say:
> It is not clear what the HREOC me
Hey list...
I am just reading an article maguire v socog here
http://www.contenu.nu/socog.html* *and can't understand this bit that
talks about the accessibility of tables...
In response to socogs claim that:
"The tables of results will contain “wrapped text within cells.”
The commission respond
Here's an odd IE CSS one that's got me stumped.
I've rebuilt the dropdown menus on a site:
http://www.seowebsitepromotion.com/
in pure CSS (except for IE, where there's a JS DOM tickle loaded up in an
IE-specific behaviour call conditional stylesheet). Fine. After much cussing
and Jack Daniel's
http://wellstyled.com/css-nopreload-rollovers.html
have you had a look at this?
All css, no preload. Might be what your looking for.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kim Kruse
Sent: Friday, 10 December 2004 6:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
Tom Livingston wrote:
> Again, I'm not debating the use of js, just wondering why people would
> turn it off.
It's a common defense against ubiquitous bad web page behavior. Too
often, script is a substitute for something that would work perfectly
well with standard HTML & CSS and that in nearly
You have a syntax error in your script
Netscape don't understand
thanks Paul, I forgot momentarily about definition lists! heheh
Rob: display: block didn't work that smoothly, but thanks mate ..
Damn there is so much to take in while learning CSS and sticking to
standards! Worth it thou..
- Josh -
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
-Original Message-
From: [
I turn off some js all the time, all of it sometimes, and often surf
with a text only browser.
I use Firefox as my primary browser, I turn off aspects of javascript by
default: mostly to do with window manipulation (open, move,resize,
raise/lower, focus), and status bar messages. and I selectiv
How about display:blocking the anchors and then floating them to the right?
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:26:53 +1100, Joshua Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Morning people.
>
> I'm having problems justifying some text in a simple manner, could anyone
> help?
>
> I want to change.
>
> this:
>
At 01:26 PM 12/9/04, Joshua Leung wrote:
By Email:
Administration: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Projects: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Services: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Nicholson:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Managing Director
I'd try a definition list:
Administration:
[E
Hi Jonathan,
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 13:43:28 -0500, Jonathan T. Sage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anyone has any information on how to fix #2, I'd also love to hear
> it. Hope this proves to be a good read!
Try removing the CDATA delimeters & adding the XHTML namespace to the
BODYTEXT element:
ht
Hi,
the following layout url works locally in firefox, mozilla, ie 5 mac
even. When uploaded to a server, the right column, secondary, is atop
main. The isp is not to blame, the site was tested out of the subdomain
so the scripts are not broken. This is not a .php question, the
question is wit
What is the cms that you are trying? Is it mosxml? I've been looking into that
one and would be interested in your opinion. I haven't gotten it to work but I
think the product looks promising.
Jonathan T. Sage wrote:
>Since this list is standards based, and I've yet to see any real
>writeup a
Most XSLT users process data server-side and then send the result of the
transformation to the client. This is a safer approach than sending XML and
XSLT to the client.
Yeah, this is absolutely right. The typical xml publishing flow looks
something like this,
[xml source (docbook/openoffice/xh
Morning people.
I'm having problems justifying some text in a simple manner, could anyone
help?
I want to change.
this:
-
By Email:
Administration: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Projects: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Services: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Nicholson: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M
Ron,
Thank you very very much.
Kim
Pringle, Ron wrote:
Now I've looked at the samples and it seem it can't be done without
having some kind of text as the link and they want to use
their own font
on the imgs. (I know... but they pay me and I do what they
want... almost)
So can the same effect
Hi all,
I have a slightly related question, and hopefully asking it will not
dissolve into something a list mom will have to stomp on... so, here goes...
Just out of curiosity, why are some people turning javascript off? I
have heard on lists that some see it as a security risk, but I have
neve
> -still debugging for firefox, anybody want offer up fixes?
I presume you have the site looking/working how you want it in another
browser (IE at a guess) ?
I think you will find it easier (and less frustrating) if you develop for
Firefox then debug other/lesser browsers.
Just a tip that has pro
> Now I've looked at the samples and it seem it can't be done without
> having some kind of text as the link and they want to use
> their own font
> on the imgs. (I know... but they pay me and I do what they
> want... almost)
>
> So can the same effect as a javascript img swap possible
> usin
> Now I've looked at the samples and it seem it can't be done without
> having some kind of text as the link and they want to use
> their own font
> on the imgs. (I know... but they pay me and I do what they
> want... almost)
>
> So can the same effect as a javascript img swap possible
> usin
Hi Jonathan,
Most XSLT users process data server-side and then send the result of the
transformation to the client. This is a safer approach than sending XML and
XSLT to the client.
XSLT is a wonderful technology. A while back we did some XML and XSLT training
for the Canadian government. For
Now I've looked at the samples and it seem it can't be done without
having some kind of text as the link and they want to use their own
font on the imgs. (I know... but they pay me and I do what they
want... almost)
So can the same effect as a javascript img swap possible using CSS
only?
At
At 10:19 AM 12/9/04, Sam Hutchinson wrote:
...I can take it because I value the opions of users of this list :)
http://www.sammyco.co.uk/acttrwebpre/PRE%20VALIDATION.htm
Sam,
Action Transport looks like a great project! Here are some very quick
comments:
I suggest making the left-hand thumbnail
Hello Sam;
It would be a really good idea to validate your document first. There are 44
errors in your markup including a second "doctype" with an "xml"
declaration! Fix those and I'll bet most of your problems will go away ...
:o)
HTH's ...
Bill.
William Haggerty
VWH Web Services
http://vwh.ca
Now I've looked at the samples and it seem it can't be done without
having some kind of text as the link and they want to use their own font
on the imgs. (I know... but they pay me and I do what they want... almost)
So can the same effect as a javascript img swap possible using CSS only?
Thanks
Good afternoon
Recently, after the pursuit of a site that does conform to XHTML 1.1
and CSS2, I became very interested in the XSL/XSLT language, since my
site has a XML CMS back end already. I began to look at ways to cut
out the PHP step. My experimentations have proved to be very
interesting,
Hi Sam
I couldn't tell if the disjointed, oddly overlapping elements were intentional
or not. It looks like you have a conflict in your width or margins which make
the banner on the right drop below the content on the left. The scattered
links on the right look like something is supposed to hap
...I can take it because I value the opions of users of this list :)
So do your best (/worst) *awkward grimace*
Hello again all,
Been beavering away on a new site:
http://www.sammyco.co.uk/acttrwebpre/PRE%20VALIDATION.htm
-still debugging for firefox, anybody want offer up fixes?
-real reason
Thanks all... should keep me busy tonight :)
Kim
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
Steven Clark wrote:
Agree or not its a common event nowdays to be accosted by some
one-issue madman or another over some standards related issue, not all
of them in proper perspective either.
I saw one of the threads to which you were referring at
webdeveloper.com. I think you would have been b
Right, what Bennie said. Here's an example, I think, of what you were
looking for, done using CSS:
http://www.adaptivepath.com/
There is a row of small face pictures on the left side, below "in-house
training" that seems to do what you want. It's a simple matter of
setting a background image
Hi!
Am Donnerstag, 9. Dezember 2004 um 17:26:33 haben Sie geschrieben:
KK> I made a quick sample without the img swap thingy
KK> http://www.mouseriders.dk/esrum/index.htm but they insist on the img
KK> swap. So now I'm wondering which approach would be best using css and no
KK> javascript getting
Why not use css for the image swap...
On 12/9/2004 11:26:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm doing a "template" for a organization and the want a entry page from
> where people can select which page they want.
> My problem is they want something like this
> http://www.esrum.dk/ny_web/esru
Hi,
I'm doing a "template" for a organization and the want a entry page from
where people can select which page they want.
My problem is they want something like this
http://www.esrum.dk/ny_web/esrum_forside.htm and they insist on having
"rollover" effect for the images (image swap). Next proble
Leigh Morresi wrote:
copies some text into [a text box from the] clipboard/buffer than contains a \n
or \r (line feed or return carriage)...the result is that the user only see's
the last line of the text they pasted in.
any ideas? ive tried using javascript to catch the event and strip out
the \
Don't see any problems here using Powerbook 17 with IE 5 on 10,3,6.
problem is elsewhere - perhaps a connection - time of day, etc.
Will Jensen
Moscow, Russia
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Dec 9, 2004, at 3:52 PM, Bert Doorn wrote:
I'm stumped on this one (partly because I can't see the problem myself as
hi,
it looks ok on ie osx. i made a screenshot so you can see yourself
http://www.digitalsushi.ch/screenshot.jpg
greetings
patirk breitenmoser
Am 09.12.2004 um 14:36 schrieb Marilyn Langfeld:
Looks fine here, OSX 10.3.5 on a TiPowerbook.
Yes, OS 10 is the same as OSX. One of those *great* ma
Looks fine here, OSX 10.3.5 on a TiPowerbook.
Yes, OS 10 is the same as OSX. One of those *great* marketing ideas!
Best regards,
Marilyn Langfeld
http://www.langfeldesigns.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1.301.598.3300 business phone
+1.301.598.0532 fax
+1.202.390.8847 mobile
On Dec 9, 2004, at 7:52 AM,
I'm stumped on this one (partly because I can't see the problem myself as I
don't have a Mac and can't afford one)
www.naturalhealthacademy.edu.au is valid xhtml1.0 strict with valid css. It
looks fine in MSIE6, Firefox 1.0 and Opera 7.54 (on PC). Also appears to be
fine on Safari (per Dan Vine'
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:42:58 +0800, Bert Doorn wrote:
> Should do:
> From http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/attributes.html:
> Title:
>All elements but BASE, BASEFONT, HEAD, HTML, META, PARAM, SCRIPT, TITLE
Fair enough - I had an idea that title didn't apply to img, but if
thats the case then
46 matches
Mail list logo
