> I've got a 3-column layout, with dropdown menus, here:
>
> http://home.vicnet.net.au/~persia/final/test.html
>
> The left & right cols are floated. This seems to work ok in IE, Moz & Firefox
> on PC and Moz & NN7 on Mac. Safari doesn't like it, however and pops the left
> col out to the right s
Hello Robin,
As is customary, I ran your site through the W3C validator. It shows
that there is no doctype declaration, and there are 13 validation
errors, most related to the lack of a doctype declaration. Fixing those
might not fix your problem but it'll ensure your code is more standards
c
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ned Collyer
> Sent: Tuesday, 3 May 2005 1:57 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: [WSG] Re: Padding tables in IE
>
> Andreas,
>
> You have:
> > #draft table{padding:0 15px 0 25px;}
>
> Ideal
Hi
I've got a 3-column layout, with dropdown menus, here:
http://home.vicnet.net.au/~persia/final/test.html
The left & right cols are floated. This seems to work ok in IE, Moz & Firefox
on PC and Moz & NN7 on Mac. Safari doesn't like it, however and pops the left
col out to the right side of t
Andreas,
You have:
> #draft table{padding:0 15px 0 25px;}
Ideally with
you want to either add padding to
#draft
or margin to the
#draft table
Padding puts space inside between the element and its content
Margin sets amount of space outside an element. (in this case, you
want margin
Vicki Berry wrote:
> I can't speak for anyone else but as displays (monitors/resolution) get
> larger and larger, liquid designs (IMO) start to look ridiculous.
> Text is easier to read in short stretches than in loong
> lines across a page. It's an accessibility thing.
It need
Michael Wilson wrote:
> It works in NN6 Win, but I'm not sure about NN on Mac; that fix link I
> posted earlier has a listing of tested browsers.
Michael,
I've tested this page [1] in NN v6.2.3 on XPPro and it does not work.
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
[1] http://www.htmldog.com
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
tee wrote:
doesn't work for IE 5.2 Mac, it's out of question.
I believe it doesn't work in NN6 either.
It works in NN6 Win, but I'm not sure about NN on Mac; that fix link I
posted earlier has a listing of tested browsers.
--
Best regards,
M. Wilson
**
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
tee wrote:
doesn't work for IE 5.2 Mac, it's out of question.
I believe it doesn't work in NN6 either.
It works in NN6 Win, but I'm not sure about NN on Mac; that fix link I
posted earlier has a listing of tested browsers.
--
Best regards,
M. Wilson
**
> tee wrote:
>> doesn't work for IE 5.2 Mac, it's out of question.
>
> I believe it doesn't work in NN6 either.
>
> Tee, I've sent you an email off-list, let me know if you don't get it.
>
Thanks Thierry, Sorry I didn't response. Was caught up with a lengthy
conversation with client over the pho
tee wrote:
> doesn't work for IE 5.2 Mac, it's out of question.
I believe it doesn't work in NN6 either.
Tee, I've sent you an email off-list, let me know if you don't get it.
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
**
The discussion list for http
Dear Group,
I hope this is on-topic. I recently persuaded a client to convert their
table-based design to a standards CSS-based design using XHTML Strict. The
entire site validates.
However, despite my strong oppisition they want to implement a "Hit
Counter," and I'm concerned that it will produc
tee wrote:
Thanks! Not trying to discredit the effort of SOS creator, but it doesn't
work for IE 5.2 Mac, it's out of question.
I don't think SoS not working in Mac IE 5.2 is a discredit even if you
were trying. :) Personally, I've never given it too much thought.
Regardless, if you use the metho
Thanks Thierry, I was at your site yesterday reading your tjkdesign dropdown
tutorial. It definitely looks promising (works for IE 5.2 Mac) but I wasn't
sure if I can borrow the code to my client' website as I don't see the CC
license logo. Anything that requires my client pay more than what is alr
> If you take the implementation of your navigation one step further and
> give your top-level navigation items ("menu 4" for example) a "home"
> page that also provides the links found in the dropdown, IE users with
> JavaScript turned off can still easily navigate the site with only one
> additio
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 21:41:11 +0100, tee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need to create a complex online order form that look something like
this:
http://www.melsmarket.com/cgi-bin/orderonline.cgi
All I have to say, is...
Tidy: 486 warnings, 7 errors - Too many warnings to display
--
Peter J. Farrel
That's not so difficult
object namered stuff
text
Repeat.
In the style sheet, you know how wide your fieldset is going to be, let's
say 500px.
Give your label and check box a width that ends up being half the distance:
Label:width:225px checkbox width;20px.
Now, float them all to the left.
Ther
tee wrote:
I have a horizontal menu done in CSS with set current option. menu 1
|| menu 2 || menu 3 || menu 4 || menu 5 || menu 6 ||
but now my client wants to insert drop-down menu in menu 4 button.
This can easily be done with DHTML menu that I have from Project
Seven, but I reall
tee wrote:
> Seven, but I really prefer to stay with css menu as it delivers
> cleaner code. I was thinking perhaps I can insert one dhtml menu in
Son of suckerfish dropdowns:
http://www.htmldog.com/articles/suckerfish/dropdowns/
I'm a bit biased about this one:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/
Just so you're not ostracized by the group, I'll provide this handy
little link about what dhtml is and isn't. Check out the section
under "DHTML is NOT a W3C Standard".
http://www.w3schools.com/dhtml/dhtml_intro.asp
On 5/2/05, tee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a horizontal menu done in CS
I have a horizontal menu done in CSS with set current option.
menu 1 || menu 2 || menu 3 || menu 4 || menu 5 || menu 6 ||
but now my client wants to insert drop-down menu in menu 4 button. This can
easily be done with DHTML menu that I have from Project Seven, but I really
prefer
On 5/2/05, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:> Something I find really strange is that a lot of people who put> emphasis on Web Standards suddenly found their way back to> non-liquid, 800px, centered design. I am wondering why that is?
i really admi
and I found this answer (Fixed or fluid width? Elastic!) here
I was going to say so... Elastic design !
As Ingo noted, there is quite a bit of discussion on the subject.
Besides the usual arguments, one aspect I haven't seen mentioned often.
Webcontent is seen on a variety of displays : mobile p
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] wrote:
Something I find really strange is that a lot of people who put
emphasis on Web Standards suddenly found their way back to
non-liquid, 800px, centered design. I am wondering why that is?
Makes me wonder too. :-)
I find this amazing: when I browse the web a
Andreas Boehmer wrote:
Gee, that's a new one to me! Is a HTML 4 tag? I've never come acrossit.
absolutely, a quick googling turns this article up - looks like quite a good rundown...
http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/tables/tablesaccessibility.html
or theres always the w3c spec if youre up for a
Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media] schrieb:
Something I find really strange is that a lot of people who put emphasis on
Web Standards suddenly found their way back to non-liquid, 800px, centered
design. I am wondering why that is?
Andreas, there is a long discussion with many comments in some blogs
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vicki Berry
> Sent: Monday, 2 May 2005 9:05 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Mystery connection of css and non-liquid design
>
> I can't speak for anyone else but as displays
>
Bert -
Specifying the height and width of the small images fixed the problem.
Thanks!
Yeah, I know the home page shot is HUGE - Client demanded it after much
effort on my behalf to talk him out of it. Win some, you lose some.
I know I shouldn't spec font sizes in px, but I'm confused about the w
I can't speak for anyone else but as displays (monitors/resolution) get
larger and larger, liquid designs (IMO) start to look ridiculous.
Text is easier to read in short stretches than in loong
lines across a page. It's an accessibility thing.
In addition, at least you do know w
Something I find really strange is that a lot of people who put emphasis on
Web Standards suddenly found their way back to non-liquid, 800px, centered
design. I am wondering why that is?
The majority of pages that show up in this group for review display some
kind of centered design with 800px (o
Ingo Chao schrieb:
Carl Reynolds schrieb:
http://hyperbole-software.com/movie-buzz/
http://www.satzansatz.de/cssd/tmp/disappearingcontent.html
And I think the problem (the a. p. menu is disappearing in IE6 and IE5.5
on reload) is triggered when the floated div#center-layout's
margin-left: any v
Gee, that's a new one to me! Is a HTML 4 tag? I've never come across
it. Then again: haven't worked with tables in a while.
Thanks, I'll give it a try!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Peter Ottery
Sent: Monday, 2 May
Carl Reynolds schrieb:
... if I narrow the IE window enough that a horizontal scroll
bar appears and refresh, or go to the page for the first time, the menu
area (on the left) disappears. If I then widen the window far enough for
the scroll bar to go away, the menu appears and remains visible, e
Gene Falck schrieb:
... I just checked on the 269840 bug and it sounds as
if it might be related to a nuisance problem I've
been seeing in a huge local app (my work notes)...
My problem isn't lines but rather an occasional
vertical doubling of the background image I am using
for LI bullets. The dou
Andreas wrote:>>> I am having difficulties getting IE to give a table a padding-left.
I dont think adding padding to the table itself is going to be reliable - as youve found out :)
I'd say that what you want to do is add padding to the cell/s of the table.
If you want to add padding to one co
On 2 May 2005, at 4:41 PM, Neerav wrote:
Since this is Possibly OT
Possibly?!
___
Omnivision. Websight.
http://www.omnivision.com.au/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.or
36 matches
Mail list logo
