Re: [WSG] Great Radio National Podcast on Deafness

u/rn/podcast/feeds/lnl_20060310.mp3 25 MB runs for >> approximately 1 hour >> >> >> Lisa Herrod >> Senior Consultant, Usability Sure don't see any sign of a transcript on that site anyway. That is just nuts. Wow. Shame on abc.net.au. Wonder if any loc

Re: [WSG] Plain text v HTML on this list

lain text can't it? > > I think Lachlan meant that + bottom-quoting? I don't know what Lachlan meant entirely, but I 100% require plain text and top-quoting. I usually immediately delete the alternatives without reading. Too much email; too little time. Rick Faaberg *

Re: [WSG] TARGET in 4.01 Strict

udience to be. :-) They can of course continue in that new window - their choice. Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] TARGET in 4.01 Strict

ehow encourage visitors to come back to the > original site; if someone goes twelve clicks deep on the linked-to > site, I think it's a safe bet they're not coming back ;) I wouldn't assume that. In fact some of my audien

Re: [WSG] TARGET in 4.01 Strict

n the new window (with the 12 clicks inside) be much quicker? Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] CSS Driven?

web standards. Most threads *never* end! I'm leaving. I'll check back in a few months and see what's goin' on. Have fun! Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup

Re: [WSG] Pipe separated lists

pipe separated lists is an old web convention that > has its own meaning. And the W3C still uses it: > > http://www.w3.org/ Touché! :-) Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgrou

Re: [WSG] Browser check & Site crit please

On 11/29/05 5:59 AM "Richard Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Hi everyone, I just joined this list I like it when there's a site identifier in the subject of the emails. Doesn't have to be the site name (so your customer won't find it) but just some identifier like "problems with

Re: [WSG] Dragon Way (Site Check)

ndent, or possibly too-big-of-graphics dependent, but those would affect all platforms. You probably know that. :-) I didn't find the site "slow" in Safari on my Mac, fwiw. Hth Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandar

Re: [WSG] Dragon Way (Site Check)

ndent, or possibly too-big-of-graphics dependent, but those would affect all platforms. You probably know that. :-) I didn't find the site "slow" in Safari on my Mac, fwiw. Hth Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandar

Re: [WSG] University textbook or other resources?

On 11/22/05 10:45 PM "Rick Faaberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: >> Have you considered "Building Accessible Websites" by Joe Clark? You >> can read it for free online. >> http://www.joeclark.org/book/ > > Does that comprise the entire book

Re: [WSG] University textbook or other resources?

On 11/22/05 4:42 PM "Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Have you considered "Building Accessible Websites" by Joe Clark? You > can read it for free online. > http://www.joeclark.org/book/ Does that comprise the entir

Re: [WSG] Accessibility: Default placeholders

On 11/18/05 2:16 AM "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I think part of the problem here is that Great read. Thanks. You have many valid thoughts, and you express them well. :-) Rick Faaberg ** The discus

Re: [WSG] specifying width of

On 10/24/05 10:31 PM "Paul Noone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Am I the only one getting blank replies from Joshua? I think there're a bunch of funny characters in his posts as I recently posted. Possibly some unicode thing-a-maroo? I can't read his messages. **

Re: [WSG] specifying width of

On 10/24/05 10:06 PM "Joshua Street" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > On 10/25/05, Andreas Boehmer [Addictive > Media] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Normally I would do that, but > in this particular case I was hoping not to > use server-side formatting of > the content. But it seems I will hav

Re: [WSG] Feedback www.mcguireomaha.com

On 10/14/05 1:13 PM "Collin Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 1:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org > Subject: [WSG] Feedback > > I have been a fly on the wall for some time in this group and I was really

Re: [WSG] Browser Stats

On 10/12/05 10:43 PM "Helmut Granda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > it seems like FF is loosing terrain, is w3schools accurate? It's accurate in my case. On Mac, I think FF pretty well s*cks - what with stuck menus and stalls and all that sort of thing. I went back to Safari after about 2

Re: [WSG] Background Alignment

; How wide is the background image? Perhaps it's simply a rounding > issue that can be resolved by making the image an even number of pixels wide. 700px is even... Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See h

Re: [WSG] WE05 - who's going?

in USA and will never be able to go to WE and meet you all. Thanks! Rick Faaberg Ps. Here's "me": <http://www.namtc.org/images/rickf.jpg> Not really, just teasing! :-) ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org

Re: [WSG] IE Showing Transparent - APOLOGY

.". Where do we draw the line on these sites? Is an image of a lady sunbathing nude on a beach over the line? *I* wouldn't think so, but even that might bother others, I suppose. You get my drift, I'm sure. I'm for something like "site check please whatever.com [adu

Re: [WSG] teaching students developing to web standards

ed, you know?), but maybe I missed it! ;-) Have a link to a thread in the archive? Thanks! Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

[WSG] teaching students developing to web standards

es to figure all this out? Any lesson plans out there, by chance? :-) Thanks Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list &

Re: [WSG] Tables and divs and soon

And the > errors in table based sites have been almost invariably associated > with the table markup. Umm, so folks who do tables for layout don't care about W3C validation. This is a revelation? Best, Rick Faaberg

Re: [WSG] (sorry about the double post!) EOM

On 8/30/05 12:25 PM "scott reston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > And now you've made it a triple. We all understand this happens. Don't apologize. Rick ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandards

Re: [WSG] Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility with Firefox

On 8/24/05 9:55 AM "dwain alford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Rick Faaberg wrote: >> I would assume that also, but the installation complained greatly > about my >> Java environment and then I had to abort installation. >> > > that's

Re: [WSG] Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility with Firefox

that also, but the installation complained greatly about my Java environment and then I had to abort installation. Wondering if anybody's done the install successfully on OSX, especially on 10.3.9 (and how they did it). Maybe it shouldn't be on this list though. Email is fine if an

Re: [WSG] Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility with Firefox

On 8/23/05 10:25 PM "dwain alford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > i just downloaded the accessibar at the mozdev web site. it's got a > built in reader; so if you have speakers or a headset you can hear how > accessible your page is in a reader. it's not superior quality audio, > but it de

Re: [WSG] Accessibility, the possibilities

everybody immediately clear caches and turn off proxy and try again, okay? :-) Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] RE: Hot Topic: HTML design

just make it up and so there never could be a textbook? Seems crazy Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] Increase/Decrease font size functionality?

alistapart.com/articles/relafont/> "Here¹s a simple solution for text resizing that respects users¹ choices and also gives them an additional option for resizing." Hth Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.o

Re: [WSG] Flash 100% wide layout issues - resorting to javascript - eek!

On 8/9/05 3:00 AM "Brendan Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I've come crawling back with some issues. I never seem to be much help to > anyone else - I hope someone can help me here. Grey tiny text. ** The discussion list for http:

Re: [WSG] Logic?

> VINOD It seems you need to login to the Web Standards Group server and unsubscribe. Go here <http://webstandardsgroup.org/> and scroll down and do the Member Login. Then, click on Unsubscribe and you'll be on your way very soon. Is that what you need? Rick Faaberg *

Re: [WSG] My life as an 800x600 leper (was: Site Check: Broadleaf)

t do you realize that there are monitors that support 2560 x 1600 pixels? <http://www.apple.com/displays/specs.html> 800x600 seems a bit prehistoric... Now, you should think about getting your shift key fixed! ;-) Rick Faaberg ** The discu

Re: [WSG] Site Check: Broadleaf

t; Bert Doorn, Better Web Design 100% agreement here. *Please* no more rtf/html posts here! I delete rtf/html posts immediately and other people do too I know for a fact. B-) Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Re: [WSG] circodeliaproducciones.com - thoughts on this site

HTML strict (W3C again). Attractive, interesting design imho. Layout blows up with text-resizing, though. Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] 2 ?'s

lt;http://solardreamstudios.com/_img/learn/css/footerstick/footerstick.html> --- end quoting Seems to work in Safari and degrades okay in IE Mac. Hth, Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstan

Re: [WSG] footer technique

On 7/16/05 4:15 AM "Rick Faaberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: >> Apparently it doesn't work in IE5 Mac or Safari. IE5 Mac I can mostly >> live without, but Safari is a bit of a bugger. I don't have a Mac here >> so I can't test - I&

Re: [WSG] footer technique

i for me (Safari 1.3). Doesn't work in IE 5.2.x - the footer goes up tight to the content and not down to bottom of viewport. Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] HR - Presentation or Structure?

On 7/12/05 3:06 AM "Nathan Rutman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > However, I think if we look at the larger use of horizontal rules in > other mediums, we'll see that there's still a place for them on the web, > especially if we want a web that can store content from those other mediums. Ca

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

> But I don't even open "Help Needed" type subject > lines. And I never read HTML/RTF email either. Text is too small. Rick ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for

Re: [WSG] help or web standards group?

r them? Hint, hint > people ;)) to keep them grounded. I concur. Whenever I've seen a 'newbie' list split, most if not all of the subscribers are newbies - doesn't exactly advance their science. Rick Faaberg ** The dis

Re: [WSG] Page structure - navigation

ignore those links. Is there something wrong with "go to" whatever section? Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] *DETECTED* Online User Violation

On 5/31/05 1:47 AM "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > We regret to inform you that your account has been suspended due to the > violation of our site policy, more info is attached. Detected what? What did I do so wrong? Man, I thought I was a good citizen here. Thank you,

Re: [WSG] Definition lists for comments in blogs

On 5/30/05 4:49 AM "Rowan Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > What would be wrong with doing something like this? > > Comment Title > > Posted by foobar on foobar > > > > Comment text > > The only thing I can think of is: are you aware of the origin of "fubar" (which is the correct

Re: [WSG] Site check - lastminute.com

end for verifying print output > (assuming it would be at all accurate in the first place). On FF Mac, just choose File > Print and then click on Preview button. No? Hth, Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org

Re: [WSG] Formatting tables

ad differing opinions on all this XHTML and whatever stuff as being worthwhile. Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] Regarding "Position This! CSS Positioning Demystified"

___ > Omnivision. Websight. > http://www.omnivision.com.au/ > > (Safari 1.3 / OS X 10.3.9) > On 24 Apr 2005, at 4:05 PM, Rick Faaberg wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Position This! CSS Positioning Demystified: >> <http://www.informit.com/articles/article.asp?p=170513

[WSG] Regarding "Position This! CSS Positioning Demystified"

Hi all, Position This! CSS Positioning Demystified: I find it slightly humorous/ironic that that page has significant wrapping problems in Safari. Haven't checked other browsers. Whatever! ;-) Rick ***

Re: [WSG] IE7 update

On 4/23/05 3:53 AM "Lea de Groot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Exciting stuff! > Wouldn't be a strange world if we didn't curse developing for IE? > It sure would be! :-) > Lea > ~ looking for a position in Brisbane. Contact me for CV. Rick ~ looking for a position in Hillsboro/Portlan

Re: [WSG] Client wants flashing text

On 4/14/05 2:48 PM "Jeff Oien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > When a client wants some flashing text for emphasis, > what do you do or tell them? I've seen some fairly tasteful things done with Flash to provide visual interest. Maybe something as simple as horizontal scroll or simple animat

Re: [WSG] JavaScript and escaped quotes

On 4/14/05 2:51 AM "Juergen Auer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: >> var msg="Don't Look Now"; >> >> Don't Look Now > > This works. But what to do if the message also needs " inside? Can

Re: [WSG] Web standards as a selling point?

ounts, I've learned this the hard way. IMO, we use web standards for our convenience and efficiency - doesn't have anything to do with the clients' needs unless you have clients that somehow have a 'nut' for web standards. I don't have any currently. Rick Faaberg ***

Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty

On 4/9/05 1:01 AM "Absalom Media" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I'm still only recieving one copy of everyone else's post on the list > apart from scott. You might as well set a trash/junk mail rule. That'

Re: [WSG] UNSUBSCRIBE PLEASE

On 4/9/05 1:19 AM "Aaron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Please unsubscribe me. I think you need to login here to unsubscribe: <http://webstandardsgroup.org/> HTH Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for htt

Re: [WSG] flash and accessabilty

On 4/9/05 1:01 AM "Absalom Media" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I'm still only recieving one copy of everyone else's post on the list > apart from scott. You might as well set a trash/junk mail rule. That'

Re: [WSG] Comments on new wirelessforum.org.nz site?

week. One other thing is that I'd put 3-6 pixels of margin at the top of the page. I think that looks attractive generally since the other three sides have big margins. My opinion only! :-) Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for

Re: [WSG] Comments on new wirelessforum.org.nz site?

On 4/7/05 12:53 AM "Sigurd Magnusson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > We just 'soft launched' a new website, http://www.wirelessforum.org.nz, > so that we can gather a final set of feedback and changes for a Monday > meeting to see the project finished next week. > > The entire site is XHTML

Re: [WSG] Website Check (hopkinsprogramming.net)

> I've recently re-done my website. Everybody put the title or URL of the website in the "website check" message subject, okay? Thanks! :-) Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgro

Re: [WSG] Orange and Blue

Aren't those the phpbb colors? And sort of "open source" colors? Rick Faaberg Ps. Everybody stop sending HTML email to here okay? I, for one, usually immediately delete such mail without reading it since normally the font is way too small. Sorry for the negativity. *

Re: [WSG] Standards and site structuring

I think that becomes absurd really quick, and ultimately leads to software creating websites with no human intervention required. :-( Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/gui

Re: [WSG] cover me -- I'm gonna be naughty!

e about this list when it's under control - otherwise, bye bye. Thanks Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] Navigation principals

On 1/29/05 4:22 PM "Stefen Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I'm trying to put together a document on navigation principals to improve site > usability Should be "principles" but otherwise I'm looking forward to the result! Rick ** Th

Re: [WSG] Review of website please

and, I can't even get the page to load, fwiw. Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: My Apologies & Defence !! RE: [WSG] 2 WEEKS TONIGHT! Funkdub @ City Bar, Chester

some people get so bent out of shape with what is such an obvious errant message and can't realize that they need to just "hit delete" on these things. The "bent" people owe you an apology in my opinion. Sigh Rick Faaberg **

Re: [WSG] Help with border

der on the left column? Would it be better to have it on the center column? Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] Site check

r Mac browsers" or "please check this in your PC browsers". Also, it would be cool if folks would provide some parenthetical reference to what website we're talking about since "site check" occurs with great regularity - like "site check www.mywonderfuls

Re: [WSG] Site check please!! Oh, you MAC people ... are you getting sick of me yet? ;~)

On 1/3/05 5:42 PM "Mani Sheriar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I have another request for a site check and, once again, Mac users are > especially needed. > > Please see: http://www.manisheriar.com/globalrocket/indexNEW.htm > Superficially at least, looks fine on latest Safari. Same for

Re: [WSG] Web Design in 2005

> > http://www.fortymedia.com/2005-web-design-forecast.fhtml Very interesting read. Thanks I agree about the "web standards look". It's generally very tired and bland. Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://websta

Re: [WSG] HOW DO I KNOW THAT MY HTML FILE HEADER IS BEING SENT CORRECTLY?

correct? Shouldn't your query be sent to a Perl discussion list? Thanks Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] CSS rounded box generator

com/recursos/css-rounded-box/ > > I'll take into account all the suggestions and critics > > -- > Carlos Rincón Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Very, very nice. Any ideas on how I could put a rounded stripe of color with text in it acro

Re: [WSG] Site review plz

and the CMS > is 99% finished, it will launch mid Jan 2005. > > I look forward to your response! Much of the type is very, very small in Firefox Mac, so I can't read it. Examples: all the nav_n styles, sidebar, footer, accesskey, and poweredby. That's just on the first p

Re: [WSG] unsubscribe info

t; and login (lower right part of the page). Then you can unsubscribe by clicking on "Unsubscribe". HTH Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] A standards compliant remake.

28 +1100, Chris Stratford > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks Jolorence, What was the URL again? Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] Semantic Breadcrumbs

imensions. Home -> News -> Today's News -> Summary Home -> News -> Today's News -> Detail Home -> News -> Yesterday's News -> Summary Home -> News -> Yesterday's News -> Detail etc. If you leave any "nodes" out, you've los

Re: [WSG] NN4 - Anyone Care?

more current browsers, for example. Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] Is IE/Mac still messing up my page?

; menu is wrapped and overlapping the "based in" text and there's a horizontal line in there for some reason. So yeah, it's busted in IE Mac 5.2.x. I don't know how to fix it though (didn't check out your code). Also the design is very,

Re: [WSG] contacting list members

he standards environment in Spain?" Sure seems related to web standards, but I could be wrong. :-) Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] Adobe Forum comment on CSS in visual editors

underneth its ugly. Sorry, but your post is idiotic. I use GoLive everyday and all the code it produces is "standard". What GoLive are you using that produces non-standard code? Rick Faaberg Ps. Please learn to spell, and to use apostrophes for p

Re: [WSG] It's so frustrating. Webstandars, accesibility and Firefox as a sales argument.

ved in using standards, if anything > its less work. Building using standards is a choice not an extra. Keep studying those apostrophes though - plurals vs. possessives vs. contractions, etc.! Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for ht

Re: [WSG] How not to inherit

On 11/20/04 8:24 PM "Lee Underwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > > a:hover { > background-color: #dedede; > color: #385468; > text-decoration: none; > } > > #navbar-main a:hover, #navbar a:hover { > text-decoration: underline; > } > > > The problem is, I don't want the "navbar" rule

Re: [WSG] Font size ADMIN - THREAD CLOSED

On 11/19/04 4:02 AM "Brett Walsh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Here here. Make that "hear, hear" and you're on! :-) Best, Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See

Re: [WSG] Site review

you care. But on Safari it's fine and I am VERY impressed with your design and execution (providing the contrast is pumped up a bit in some areas as per previous feedback). Great job overall IMO. Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list

Re: [WSG] Site Review Request : theatre.msu.edu

h! > > http://theatre.msu.edu Not to be negative, but if you care - it's busted on Mac IE 5.2.x. Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] Design template for CMS, any thougts?

only white. I'm not sure I'd ever go with full-justified text, but maybe that's a personal thing. I just don't really like extra space between words that only serves to full-justify the text. Loads fast - clean design - and here I am of Norwegian descent (

Re: [WSG] css scrolling

On 11/12/04 9:53 PM "Bennie Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Rick, > Would you check the site again? I removed the css scrolling, > hope that was the problem. > Yes, everything appears to function now without going numb after awhile. (Safa

Re: [WSG] css scrolling

list in FF. Unrelated, but after clicking and scrolling around and clicking etc. in Safari, eventually the page goes "numb" - no scrolling, no clicking, no rollovering works. FWIW Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list fo

Re: Re[4]: [WSG] Float Problem on IE Mac

On 11/12/04 1:21 AM "Iain Harrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Sales figures. Market share. Web stats. Globally, the Mac is under > 2.5% on web stats. Gee, I wish *I* owned 2.5% of *any* global market! :-) Rick Faaberg

Re: Re[2]: [WSG] Float Problem on IE Mac

! (oops - this is off-topic for this list) Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] International Pages Check

nything else, I think you need captions (or whatever the stds thing is) for all those flags. I recognize one of them - guess which one! Rick Faaberg ps. Your server is really slow to deliver to over here in North America. ** The

Re: [WSG] Site Check please

r time AFAIK and there's no way to adjust for time zones since PHP cannot determine what time zone a client is in, at least in the research I did a couple of years ago. Javascript can use the client computer's clock time, but PHP cannot as i

Re: [WSG] Brisbane November Meeting Canc^h^h^h - Postponed

personally serve me cake! :-) Just kidding - I'll be quiet. Hope everybody will be safe, Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] 6 days of WSG meeting frenzy

On 11/7/04 10:46 PM "Cameron Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Wait a minute! You guys get cake!? But they can't eat it too! :-) Rick ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/

Re: [WSG] Page Check

On 11/3/04 10:36 PM "David Laakso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Comments and suggestions on this page welcome. > http://www.dlaakso.com/ > Thanks. There appear to be some accessibility warnings on WAI and 508.

Re: [WSG] Access key in IE6

On 11/3/04 10:06 PM "Rick Faaberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > On 11/3/04 9:59 PM "The Man With His Guide Dog At The Tent Store" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > >> click here to return to table of Contents or press ALT >>

Re: [WSG] Access key in IE6

.bc.cx/ASICAboutUs.php It doesn't appear to work in FF Mac or Safari either. Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

Re: [WSG] WE04 Summary (blowing my own trumpet)

the article. > (Not everything at the conference mind you!) Great job! One thing - accessibility issues include dealing with old browsers and user agents that don't do CSS, I'd think. Maybe you could have stressed that a bit (more?). Co

Re: [WSG] Firefox Promotion

On 10/22/04 7:20 AM "Trovster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > If anyone can help, you can either email me personally or keep it on the list. I'd keep it off list. This list is getting too much questionable content t

Re: [WSG] w3c badges

On 10/17/04 8:58 PM "Michael Dale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Here are two nicer looking ones > > http://blog.dalegroup.net/images/validx.gif (xhtml 1.1) > http://blog.dalegroup.net/images/validc.gif (css) > > Michael Dale Those are pretty nice! Are

Re: [WSG] w3c badges

n a client's site. What is your opinion (and practice) with regard to putting the W3C badges on you clients' sites? I'm thinking "just don't do it". Best, Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgro

[WSG] w3c badges

ers care in the first place? Best, Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help **

  1   2   >