[Zope-dev] How about some details about SGI's Supportfolio?

A couple of Zope Announce's ago, our attention was drawn to this press release: http://www.zope.com/News/PressReleases/SGI-2003-01-22 I was wondering if there are any stories behind that --- what technologies were used, what problems there were, how many people were involved in building it, wha

Re: [Zope-dev] interaction with local FS

On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 01:24 AM, Mario Bianchi wrote: This thread probably belongs in the main zope mailing list. LocalFS will let you map a local directory into Zope. AdaptableStorage probably will too, but it will be harder to setup at the moment. No way to access 'someuser''s file

RE: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

> > Here's the status - an engagement that we're doing has been bringing > > up some issues regarding ZODB and ZEO in large-scale environments. I > > think that the fixes are useful enough that they should be in 2.6.1, > > but getting them "finalized" has taken longer than I expected. > > I'd love

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

I updated the Zope 2.6 project page to reflect this, figuring that it should at least be *somewhere* on the web :). It's nothing fancy, I just included the note and took out some of the older Status notes that reflected the developm

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

Here's the status - an engagement that we're doing has been bringing up some issues regarding ZODB and ZEO in large-scale environments. I think that the fixes are useful enough that they should be in 2.6.1, but getting them "finalized" has taken longer than I expected. I'd love to know what kin

RE: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

> > afaict, the public schedule since December has been that this > is imminent any > > day now. I have some important bug fixes that I would like to > include in > > 2.6.1, and I would like some assurance that beta 2 will not be released > > mid-merge. > > I don't think b2 will be release without

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 07:40, Toby Dickenson wrote: > On Saturday 25 January 2003 1:07 am, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Is there an estimate for this? > > afaict, the public schedule since December has been that this is imminent any > day now. I have some important bug fixes that I would like to i

[Zope-dev] RE: [Zope] interaction with local FS

There is a product called LocalFS, which will allow you access to the file system. However, the access is with the username/password specified in the properties of LocalFS, so it may be laborious to set up a LocalFS instance for each user you have. Scott -Original Message- From: Mario Bi

[Zope-dev] interaction with local FS

Hi everyone, I'm curious in finding out how zope interacts with the server's file system: let's say I want to allow the users of my site to manage (read/write) their own files on the server's file system, does Zope support this goal anyhow? As far as I've seen, to me the response seems to be no,

[Zope-dev] False alarm (was: [BUG] maybe yet unknown BTREES bug)

Attention: cross post Dieter Maurer wrote at 2003-1-24 09:13 +0100: > > We have run in an apparent "BTrees" bug (with the "BTrees" version > included in Zope 2.5.1). > >We try to insert a value into an "BTrees.OOBTree.OOBTree" instance >with > > tree[k]= v > >and ge

Re: [Zope-dev] 2.6.1b2?

On Saturday 25 January 2003 1:07 am, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > If only it were that easy. Everybody wants "no new features" except > > > for the one feature they desperately want to have without upgrading to > > > the next feature release. :-( > > > > Still, we're b

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6.0 ZMI Problem for CJK(Collector 623) patch.

On Sunday 26 January 2003 7:25 pm, Kazuya FUKAMACHI wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:33:40 + > > Toby Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am currently looking at getting this into 2.6.1 or 2.6.2. I would > > appreciate confirmation that you are all happy with this combination of > > patch