Re: SV: TSM 5.5 (CLIENT/SERVER)
Hi, One of our two TSM servers hit with TSM table locking at 5.5.0 with performing a long running restore. We upgraded to 5.5.1 and have been in a steady state since. TSM OS AIX, 5.3 Tivoli Storage Manager Extended Edition 5.5.1.0 currently However, our second TSM server which backs up to a CENTERA Device. We have open service calls with AIX and TSM support working on the following issue. We collected a bunch of data which both hardware and TSM support is currently working on. After upgrading this TSM server from 5.2 to 5.5 we began to experience paging problems on the server. So, bad in fact that AIX started killing processes. The only change we had made that started this issue was to upgrade from TSM 5.2 to TSM 5.5 and installing a SDK 3.2.1 install seperately for the Centera piece. I would be interested if anyone experienced the same issue or if anyone is using a Centera with a similiar environment and if you are experiencing any issues. AIX 5.3, ML 3 TSM upgrade 5.2 to 5.5.0 and install of SDK 3.2.1(with newer version of TSM server install of SDK must be installed seperately. It used to be bundled in the with the TSM upgrades). Thank You, Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 Christian Svensson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 09/10/2008 10:49 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject [ADSM-L] SV: TSM 5.5 (CLIENT/SERVER) Hi, Do not upgrade to 5.5.0 because you got critical issues in 5.5.0 We have upgrade many servers to 5.5.1 and that works much better so upgrade to 5.5.1. Best Regards Christian Svensson WW Support: +44-1453-84 7009 U.S. Support: +1-866-832-2267 Cell: +46-70-325 1577 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype: cristie.christian.svensson Från: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] f#246;r Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 10 september 2008 16:28 Till: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Ämne: Re: TSM 5.5 (CLIENT/SERVER) We have been running 5.5.0.3 for a long time with no issues. However there is a pretty critical problem with 5.5.0.x that is resolved in 5.5.1 so it is suggested you go to that level after upgrading to base 5.5 (you did not say what level you are coming from). CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Moving a Wintel node to a new piece of like hardware
Hello TSMers, What constitutes the TSM server to backup a node which is moved to a new piece of like hardware and keeps the same nodename and ip address? We are migrating a couple servers from a remote location that are currently backing up to a TSM server at this remote location which is at TSM server version 5.4.1.0 and AIX operating system at 5.3. There are a few nodes that will keep their current node names and current ip addresses but will be moving to a new piece of hardware. We are exporting nodedata and policy information to LTO tape and then importing that information into my TSM server.My question is when I go to do the first backup for this node to my TSM server , Will my TSM server see this as a new node and back it up as a full the first time or will it be business as usual and just perform an incremental backup. Background: TSM Server: TSM Server Version:5.5.1.0 Operating System:AIX, 5.3 TSM Node: TSM Client Version 5.4.1.4 Operating System: Windows 2003 Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Memory Issue: Since Upgrading TSM Server from 5.2 to TSM 5.5 and installation of Centera SDK 3.2.1 - anyone experiencing similar problem?
Hello, I was wondering if anyone is experiencing memory issues since upgrading to TSM server 5.5 and installation of Centera SDK 3.2.1? Starting with TSM 5.5 the Centera SDK had to be installed separately where in the past the Centera SDK was part of the install package. We have noticed that since upgrading our TSM server from 5.2 to 5.5 that large amount of memory is being used which we suspected it was coming from the dsmserv process.Each time the pages are freed is when we have killed the dsmserv process.We made NO changes to the OS and the only change was the upgrade of the TSM server from 5.2 to 5.5. We opened a call with IBM TSM support which in turn had us run some data collection scripts for a few days. In summary, IBM confirmed that a large amount of memory is being used. It is not being used by any dsmserv subsystem however. We opened a ticket with AIX support which in turn rerouted the ticket back to IBM TSM support. We are hashing out where the ticket is supposed to be assigned and worked. Meanwhile, there has been no movement on the call and was curious to see if anyone else using the Centera SDK and TSM 5.5 has experienced the same problem. Background: Upgraded our TSM server from 5.2 to 5.5.0. OS: Aix 5.3 Installed SDK 3.2.1 per IBM TSM install instruction Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Memory Issue: Since Upgrading TSM Server from 5.2 to TSM 5.5 and installation of Centera SDK 3.2.1 - anyone experiencing similar problem?
Richard, Thanks for the reply and suggestions. We have a tried a few of your suggestions.IBM TSM support did have us run the following show commands.I just tried to run 'show memory' on this server and had to break out of the command because it began to cause failures with object retrievals memory/paging.AIX is having us run perfpmr as the next troubleshooting step so hopefully that will help us get down to the bottom of the memory hog. IBM did have us run a few commands that I left out from original email. 1. restart the dsmserv process 2. collect the output of 'SHOW ALLOC' one time per hour for the next 48 hours. Also collect AIX command output for 'ps aux | grep dsmserv' at the same time. 3. at the end of step 2 collect the last 48 hours of unfiltered activity log Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 07/28/2008 11:03 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] Memory Issue: Since Upgrading TSM Server from 5.2 to TSM 5.5 and installation of Centera SDK 3.2.1 - anyone experiencing similar problem? Nancy - Confer with your AIX people on identifying processes using the most memory in your server system, where 'ps' and various other monitoring facilities can report what's using what. In TSM, you can use the SHow MEMory command to report a summary of memory usage and the SHow ALLOC command to report by module. SHow THReads will report what threads are in play. Also, note that you are running base level TSM code, with no maintenance, which is not a good idea. Richard Sims CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Fw: Naming conventions of PDs/MCs
We use domain and mgmtclasses by platform which seems to work for our environment. Aix, Linux,Wintel,,Db2,Domino,etc. For example: Aix_pd Policy Domain for AIX clients Aix_ps Policy Set for Aix clients Aix_mc Description= 'MC for AIX clients' Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 Michael Bartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 03/05/2008 02:51 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Re: Fw: Naming conventions of PDs/MCs Yes, keep them short, simple and exchangeable. Sometimes you decide to migrate a node from one policy domain into a different one. Then it's very convenient to have the same names for the Mgmt-Classes as before. In general we don't name the standard/default MC, it just stays standard in any PD. For MCs we often use names that reflect the settings for the main 4 parameters, like 3-2-30-60 or 2-1-7-7. We use 0 for the nolimit value, like in 0-0-14-14. In addition to this we have some short-forms like RET14 (=0-0-14-14), sometimes we add a special MC name to make a customer happy. And of course, sometimes it gets cryptic, when you need to put additional information into the name, like in 4-3-50-80-SHDY (shared dynamic). If you have more than one TSM server, try to keep all PDs and MCs in sync - makes moving nodes between servers much saver. Just imagine what happens if the new server doesn't have the new longtime- protecting special MC and you find out just after the restore request arrives. Best regards, Michael Am 04.03.2008 um 23:46 schrieb Nicholas Cassimatis: One rule - Keep them short and simple. They need to have enough info so you know what they are, not necessarily every feature of them but I try keep them short enough (8 characters or below) so they don't line- wrap when using the Administrative Command Line. Nick Cassimatis CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Need help verifying last steps when redefining library drives - Regarding checking in the tapes again
Backgroud: TSM - 5.3.2.2 AIX -5.3.3 Library - ADIC I2000 Scalar,with IBM LTO2 drives, LTO2 fuji tapes Currently have a partitioned library: 1st partition - 16 drives 2nd partition -2 drives We are eliminating the 2nd partition and moving the 2 drives and 50 slots from the 2nd partition over to the 1st partition to equal 18 drives with the help of the library vendor. I am fuzzy on the last steps regarding checking all the tapes back into the 1st library to recognize the newly added slots. So, once I run the rebuild script that rebuilds the library,library path, drives, and paths. Final Steps: Checking in all the tapes show slots library name (to see additional slots) then checkin libv lib name search=yes checklabel=barcode status=scratch checkin libv lib name search=yes checklabel=barcode status=private then run an audit librarylib name checklabel=barcode Are these the correct steps when checking in all the tapes to recognize the library and slots? Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: for those using VTL
not allot of information right now for you... 1. We chose the EMCs' CDL 4100 - In the process of implementing it within the next few weeks. 2. Will keep you posted. 3. Will keep you posted. 4. Within the next few months we will be adding addition environments. 5. Wish List- down the road Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 Gill, Geoffrey L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 03/29/2007 05:06 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:for those using VTL We have a number of vendors coming in with their wares and I was wondering if those who use a VTL might pass on some info. As you all know when you're in these types of sales pitches you always hear how great theirs are and that nobody else can do what they do. My questions are below. 1. What VTL did you choose? 2. Is it all they said it would be? 3. If you do it over again would you choose differently and if so which one? This could also relate to wishing a current product was out at the time you made your decision. 4. Is anyone using their VTL in a multi-system environment where you have either more than 1 TSM server and/or both TSM 'AND' Netbackup? 5. Is anyone replicating their VTL to a DR site? If so are you experiencing any issues there? I understand there is going to be many answers here but I'd prefer to get the lowdown on how things work from those that are using them and not from someone who tells me how it's going to work. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator SAIC M/S-G1b (858)826-4062 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: retention values for content manager copygroup
Adam, We are use TSM Extended Edition(not TSM DRP). Our setup is as follows with Content Mgr. You are correct, CM controls the data retention. I believe even if you want to keep the data longer in TSM, and CM already deleted the data, you would not be able to restore the data without the pointers in CM. Policy D Policy S Mgmt Cla Copy Gro Versions Versions Retain Retain omain Na et Name ss Name up Name Data Ex Data De Extra V Only me istsleted ersions Version - - - - --- xxx xx xx100 0 Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 Crosskey, Adam - Resources, ICT Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 12/28/2006 06:23 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:retention values for content manager copygroup We wish to use TSM to store data from DB2 Content Manager. Assuming the CM dictates when data is deleted, what values should I specify for retention in the Content Manager TSM mgmt class copygroup? Any advice would be welcome. Happy New Year, Adam The information in this e-mail, together with any attachments, is confidential. If you have received this message in error you must not print off, copy, use or disclose the contents. The information may be covered by legal and/or professional privilege. Please delete from your system and inform the sender of the error. As an e-mail can be an informal method of communication, the views expressed may be personal to the sender and should not be taken as necessarily representing the views of the Oxfordshire County Council. As e-mails are transmitted over a public network the Oxfordshire County Council cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message. It is your responsibility to carry out all necessary virus checks. You should be aware that all emails received and sent by this Council are subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and therefore may be disclosed to other parties under that Act. www.oxfordshire.gov.uk
Re: Survey Question for Virtual Tape Users: What Vendors are you using for Virtual Tape?
Kelly, My backup window is all the time. Backups start as early as 4pm to 8am the next morning. I haven't tried more than two max processes for one of my larger pools.I have 12 disk pools (drives) tied up until 8am or longer, plus not to mention the impact to the client backup/thrashing. Backup Window is: This includes client backup, and mainframe job scheduler hooked in. Data writing to all 12 disk pools from 4pm -8am Starttime: 4pm Endtime:8am Currently: Backups occur during 4pm 8am *I would tie up those drives from 4pm-8am TSM DB backups: 7am - TSM DB full backup *problem already, clients are overlapping tsm db backup. Not good. 8am 4pm - Disk Migrations to Onsite tape occurs -12 disk pools 9am -10am :Expiration runs daily 10am -checkout script runs to take dr tapes offsite *problem which my backup from last night isn't in the checkout, but the backup from the previous day. Between 2pm-8pm: Backup onsite tape to offsite tape pools * problem, that data from the night before is still in the library so it is not going offsite until the next day...yikes. 9am - 12am -running onsite 10 onsite tape pools reclamation throughout the day, as migrations end. These are staggered. 12am-7am: Run offsite reclamation, for 7 Offsite Pools 12am = TSM DB full backup Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems (716)887-7979 HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 Kelly Lipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 12/06/2006 04:36 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: Survey Question for Virtual Tape Users: What Vendors are you using for Virtual Tape? Based on your config I'm guessing you're having trouble completing the backup stg operations due to the fact that you get a single large process running to a single tape drive (or tape to tape) and that's taking too long. I would suggest using the copystg parameter on the primary tape pool and have that large database go directly to the primary and copy pool tapes simultaneously. That will eliminate the need to do the backup stg tapepool copypool operation during daily processing. I would also backup stg diskpool copypool before I migrate. Again, the goal, I assume, is to get the backup stg operations completed as early as possible. So in summary: 1. Large stuff goes directly to tapepool with copystgpool set to copypool. You have plenty of tape drives so there should not be any conflict during the backup. 2. backup stg diskpool copypool maxproc=10 (or whatever) first thing or maybe even start this during the backup window (careful with that as that can slow the performance of client backups and the backup stg operation). 3. Simultaneous with that, backup stg tapepool copypool (just in case something when afoul). 4. backup db 5. prepare 6. Then do the migrations and other housekeeping chores. With the number of tape drives you have, I'm thinking with this rearrangement you should be able to get the work done. I don't think a VTL would help you anyway! Sorry about that you hardware sellers! Thanks, Kelly J. Lipp VP Manufacturing CTO STORServer, Inc. 485-B Elkton Drive Colorado Springs, CO 80907 719-266-8777 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy L Backhaus Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 1:20 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Survey Question for Virtual Tape Users: What Vendors are you using for Virtual Tape? Background: Tivoli Storage Manager Extended Edition 5.3.2.2 Op System AIX 5.3 ML 3 Nightly Backup 2 -2 1/2 TB Library - ADIC I2000 Scalar 18 LTO Tape Drives LTO 2 Tapes 600 slots Clients - 135 (Wintel) AIX -26 (Sybase, SQL, and DB2) We are looking into Virtual Tape Technology for our environment.1 1/2s TB data first backs up to disk then to onsite tape then we make a backup of our onsite tape to a copy stgpool and store those tapes offsite for disaster recovery.The other 1 TB of data is a DB2 database that we back up directly to onsite tape and of course make a copy of the onsite tape to offsite tape for disaster recovery. We can't get our backups done and out the door to meet our RTO objective. We are looking to add a VTL and reduce our tape drive and slot capacity in a new library to offset some of the cost for a virtual tape library.We would like to also take advantage of collocation and setup library sharing too. I would like to know what vendors you are using for virtual tape? Pros/Cons(Any regrets, Success Stories). Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems (716)887-7979 HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation
Survey Question for Virtual Tape Users: What Vendors are you using for Virtual Tape?
Background: Tivoli Storage Manager Extended Edition 5.3.2.2 Op System AIX 5.3 ML 3 Nightly Backup 2 -2 1/2 TB Library - ADIC I2000 Scalar 18 LTO Tape Drives LTO 2 Tapes 600 slots Clients - 135 (Wintel) AIX -26 (Sybase, SQL, and DB2) We are looking into Virtual Tape Technology for our environment.1 1/2s TB data first backs up to disk then to onsite tape then we make a backup of our onsite tape to a copy stgpool and store those tapes offsite for disaster recovery.The other 1 TB of data is a DB2 database that we back up directly to onsite tape and of course make a copy of the onsite tape to offsite tape for disaster recovery. We can't get our backups done and out the door to meet our RTO objective. We are looking to add a VTL and reduce our tape drive and slot capacity in a new library to offset some of the cost for a virtual tape library.We would like to also take advantage of collocation and setup library sharing too. I would like to know what vendors you are using for virtual tape? Pros/Cons(Any regrets, Success Stories). Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems (716)887-7979 HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
MountLimit: What is the max number of sessions allowed by a Devclass Centera
Hello, Anyone know what the max number of sessions allowed by Centera is? help update devclass CENTERA MOUNTLimit Specifies the new maximum number of sessions accessing the Centera device. This parameter is optional. You can specify any number from 0 or greater; however, the sum of all mount limit values for all device classes assigned to the same Centera device should not exceed the maximum number of sessions allowed by Centera. Background: TSM Storage Manager -5.3.2.2 AIX Operation System - 5.3 Mod 3 Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media, Reason Code: 137
We are working with Level 2 Support at TSM for now.DB2 is not using the DSMI_CONFIG file at all even though the setup looks correct(comparing .profile, environment variables, dsm.opt, and dsm,sys files with other successful clients that back up to TSM from DB2). Just ran a trace to confirm that it isn't picking up the dsm.opts' file. We did find out from Level II, That when we ran the 'db2adutl' utility (which we did see a session connect /end to the TSM Server activity log) uses the operating systems shell and not the API. Thanks for all the input from everyone that replied. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 zareyna [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 07/13/2006 09:15 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media, Reason Code: 137 Hi, I have encountered this error before. What I did was to key in a new password (same password) on the client and server communication in the ISC. (under Security) and the dsmapipw works. Thanks, Regards, Zareyna Salim -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy L Backhaus Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 11:40 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media, Reason Code: 137 Hi Ig, We tried the following steps this morning... 1 Delete the *.pwd file for the client nodename in the /etc/security/a dsm directory.. 2 Update the password for the client nodename to a different password than the old password. (run this on the tsm server) 3 Re-Run the DSMAPIPW to generate the password on the client side When we run the 'db2adutl' command from the client - we see in the tsm server actlog a db2 session start and stop. But, when we try to run a backup from db2, we don't see any session startand the db2 client reports the SQL2062N, 137 reason code. Noticed that the DSMAPIPW utility - doesn't appear to update the TSM.PWD on the client side (.profile) Question - Where is the DSMAPIPW password stored? Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 IG Coolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 07/12/2006 04:49 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: oddevaix:/home/archivedb2 backup db archive online use tsm SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media, Reason Code: 137 Hi Nancy, I was just figuring this out yesterday. Had the same problem, until they changed into reason code 184. But this is what i figured out so far. In order to do online backups, your logging configuration in DB2 should be set to archive logging. But your DB2 admins will probably know about this. Next, make sure you setup all TSM_ (except TSM_PASSWORD) parameters in the DB2 database to default. Although i use PASSWORDACCESS generate, i had to set the nodes password in the database config. DB2CONNECT TO YOURDB; DB2UPDATE DATABASE CFG USING TSM_PASSWORD YOURPW IMMEDIATE; DB2UPDATE DATABASE CFG USING TSM_NODENAME NULL IMMEDIATE; DB2UPDATE DATABASE CFG USING TSM_MGMTCLASS NULL IMMEDIATE; DB2CONNECT RESET; When you set any of the other parameters to anything but NULL, DB2 tries to apply them to the backupjob, which in return will fail. Have you rebooted the DB2 host, or restarted DB2 after setting the DSMI_* vars? Last, i would think that the DB2 user (or the user starting the backup process) cannot read the file you mention (libtsm.a). My reason codes 137 never mentioned a file (It is on Windows though). Have you checked the permissions on that file in relation to the active user? Good Luck. Gr. Ilja -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Nancy L Backhaus Verzonden: dinsdag 11 juli 2006 20:14 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Onderwerp: oddevaix:/home/archivedb2 backup db archive online use tsm SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media, Reason Code: 137 TSM Server 5.3.2.2 TSM DB2 Client 5.3.0.0 DB2 8.2.0 Trying to help our DB2 Admins get a backup. I know very little about DB2, so any help is appreciated. What we have tried/verified: We can run db2adutl from the client - it was successful I see in the 'Backing Up DB2 Using TSM' book, under troubleshooting suggested for 137' error, is the incorrect password We compared the .profile with another successful db2 client - that looks correct, DSM_DIR DSMI_LOG, DSMI_DIR, and DSMI_CONFIG too. Passwordgenerate set in the options file Updated the node nodename password on the TSM Server, then regenerated the password file with db2 command dsmapipw again. ERROR: DB2Node :/home/archivedb2 backup db archive online use tsm SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media /home/archive/sqllib/adsm/libtsm.a. Reason code: 137
SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media, Reason Code: 137
Hi Ig, We tried the following steps this morning... 1 Delete the *.pwd file for the client nodename in the /etc/security/a dsm directory.. 2 Update the password for the client nodename to a different password than the old password. (run this on the tsm server) 3 Re-Run the DSMAPIPW to generate the password on the client side When we run the 'db2adutl' command from the client - we see in the tsm server actlog a db2 session start and stop. But, when we try to run a backup from db2, we don't see any session startand the db2 client reports the SQL2062N, 137 reason code. Noticed that the DSMAPIPW utility - doesn't appear to update the TSM.PWD on the client side (.profile) Question - Where is the DSMAPIPW password stored? Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 IG Coolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 07/12/2006 04:49 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: oddevaix:/home/archivedb2 backup db archive online use tsm SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media, Reason Code: 137 Hi Nancy, I was just figuring this out yesterday. Had the same problem, until they changed into reason code 184. But this is what i figured out so far. In order to do online backups, your logging configuration in DB2 should be set to archive logging. But your DB2 admins will probably know about this. Next, make sure you setup all TSM_ (except TSM_PASSWORD) parameters in the DB2 database to default. Although i use PASSWORDACCESS generate, i had to set the nodes password in the database config. DB2CONNECT TO YOURDB; DB2UPDATE DATABASE CFG USING TSM_PASSWORD YOURPW IMMEDIATE; DB2UPDATE DATABASE CFG USING TSM_NODENAME NULL IMMEDIATE; DB2UPDATE DATABASE CFG USING TSM_MGMTCLASS NULL IMMEDIATE; DB2CONNECT RESET; When you set any of the other parameters to anything but NULL, DB2 tries to apply them to the backupjob, which in return will fail. Have you rebooted the DB2 host, or restarted DB2 after setting the DSMI_* vars? Last, i would think that the DB2 user (or the user starting the backup process) cannot read the file you mention (libtsm.a). My reason codes 137 never mentioned a file (It is on Windows though). Have you checked the permissions on that file in relation to the active user? Good Luck. Gr. Ilja -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Nancy L Backhaus Verzonden: dinsdag 11 juli 2006 20:14 Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Onderwerp: oddevaix:/home/archivedb2 backup db archive online use tsm SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media, Reason Code: 137 TSM Server 5.3.2.2 TSM DB2 Client 5.3.0.0 DB2 8.2.0 Trying to help our DB2 Admins get a backup. I know very little about DB2, so any help is appreciated. What we have tried/verified: We can run db2adutl from the client - it was successful I see in the 'Backing Up DB2 Using TSM' book, under troubleshooting suggested for 137' error, is the incorrect password We compared the .profile with another successful db2 client - that looks correct, DSM_DIR DSMI_LOG, DSMI_DIR, and DSMI_CONFIG too. Passwordgenerate set in the options file Updated the node nodename password on the TSM Server, then regenerated the password file with db2 command dsmapipw again. ERROR: DB2Node :/home/archivedb2 backup db archive online use tsm SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media /home/archive/sqllib/adsm/libtsm.a. Reason code: 137. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. =DISCLAIMER= De informatie in dit e-mailbericht is vertrouwelijk en uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Wanneer u dit bericht per abuis ontvangt, verzoeken wij u contact op te nemen met de afzender per kerende e-mail. Verder verzoeken wij u in dat geval dit e-mailbericht te vernietigen en de inhoud ervan aan niemand openbaar te maken. Wij aanvaarden geen aansprakelijkheid voor onjuiste, onvolledige dan wel ontijdige overbrenging van de inhoud van een verzonden e-mailbericht, noch voor daarbij overgebrachte virussen. The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It may be read, copied and used only by the intended recipient. If you have received it in error, please contact the sender immediately by return e-mail; please delete in this case the e-mail
oddevaix:/home/archivedb2 backup db archive online use tsm SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media, Reason Code: 137
TSM Server 5.3.2.2 TSM DB2 Client 5.3.0.0 DB2 8.2.0 Trying to help our DB2 Admins get a backup. I know very little about DB2, so any help is appreciated. What we have tried/verified: We can run db2adutl from the client - it was successful I see in the 'Backing Up DB2 Using TSM' book, under troubleshooting suggested for 137' error, is the incorrect password We compared the .profile with another successful db2 client - that looks correct, DSM_DIR DSMI_LOG, DSMI_DIR, and DSMI_CONFIG too. Passwordgenerate set in the options file Updated the node nodename password on the TSM Server, then regenerated the password file with db2 command dsmapipw again. ERROR: DB2Node :/home/archivedb2 backup db archive online use tsm SQL2062N An error occurred while accessing media /home/archive/sqllib/adsm/libtsm.a. Reason code: 137. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Domino /TSM Question
TSM Server 5.3.2.2 TSM O/S 5.3 M 3 OS: Windows 2000 Adv SP4 Current Hotifex Domino: 6.5.4 FP 2 TSM Client: 5.2.3.4 TDP Client:5.1.5.1 Does the TDP incremental backup utilize the same information as a the full backup to TSM, for example the date and time, DB ID?The problem we noticed is that we run the full email db backups on Saturdays and Sundays, then Monday-Friday night we run the incremental backups. Which instead backing up a few ids, it's backing up all the 1800 mail databases all over again on Monday only(another full) when in fact the full backup ran successful on Sunday. Domino Compact - Runs Friday night Full Backups- Sat and Sunday Mon -Friday - Incremental Backups *I understand that there really is no such thing as an incremental backup in Domino Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Domino /TSM Question
Joe, When do you run your inactivate logs? We run the compact on Friday Sat and Sun -fulls Inactive logs- after the fulls complete Incrementals (Mon-Friday) All the dbids shouldn't have changed in 1 or 2 days, and I am only getting zinged on Monday Incrementals(which is really a full), not the rest of the weekday schedule. Our compact runs on Fridays for a few hours, then the full on Saturday(1st email server), and Sundays(2nd email server), then the incrementals (Mon-Fri)- and the Mon night incremental is catching all the databases again, but not on Tues, Wed, etc. Also, the inactive of the old trans logs after the full backups completed on Sat and Sun.We used to the run the compact during full backup, but changed it for 'best practice' to Fridays instead of during the full backup. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 Joe Pendergast [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 06/29/2006 10:04 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: Domino /TSM Question The incremental backup is backing up all databases that have changed DBID since the full. Questions: Is there some process running after the full that is changing the DBID? Does this also backup all 1800 on Tuesday? We had this scenario one week and luckily figured it out quickly. For us, the full ran Saturday, then on Sunday they ran a compress on all databases. The compress changes the DBID. Monday incremental caught all databases again. Our cure was to run database cleanup routines on Saturday, and do a full backup on Sunday. This has a slight risk if there is a problem during a cleanup routine, we might have to restore to previous Sunday and roll forward the entire week, but this is very rare (we haven't needed this yet.). Nancy L Backhaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 06/29/2006 06:52 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject Domino /TSM Question TSM Server 5.3.2.2 TSM O/S 5.3 M 3 OS: Windows 2000 Adv SP4 Current Hotifex Domino: 6.5.4 FP 2 TSM Client: 5.2.3.4 TDP Client:5.1.5.1 Does the TDP incremental backup utilize the same information as a the full backup to TSM, for example the date and time, DB ID?The problem we noticed is that we run the full email db backups on Saturdays and Sundays, then Monday-Friday night we run the incremental backups. Which instead backing up a few ids, it's backing up all the 1800 mail databases all over again on Monday only(another full) when in fact the full backup ran successful on Sunday. Domino Compact - Runs Friday night Full Backups- Sat and Sunday Mon -Friday - Incremental Backups *I understand that there really is no such thing as an incremental backup in Domino Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
SANDISCOVERY ON
TSM Server 5.3.2.2 AIX 5.3 ML 3, 32 bit Before I turn this setting on ' SANDISCOVERY ON', just checking to see if anyone is running similiar levels and could confirm that they haven't had any issues after adding it. *I did see a couple hits with issues for Solaris, and AIX 5.2 64bit. Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Question - Migration
Problem: TSM doesn't have enough time during the day to drain all of the diskpools down to 0% before client backups start in the afternoon.So, on our declared disaster day, one of our critical small DB2 databases was still on disk never going to tape. Because migration selects the largest client with the largest amont of data, that small database is stuck in disk for multiple days never going to tape.I could seperate the critical servers into smaller disk pools as one solution, or collocate by group node data. Question Is there a way to force all of a client nodes data in a diskpool to migrate to tape even though it falls below the low migration setting? I see settings in update stgpool to keep data longer in disk, but I want any data that is left over from yesterday to migrate first before starting with the largest client again. Background: TSM Server Extended Edition 5.3.2.2 AIX Operating System 5.3 Our clients all back up to disk pools first , then we backup the diskpools to onsite tape pools, then do a backup of the onsite tapepools for disaster recovery and send those tapes to an offsite location. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Dr Test Soon - question on how tapes get marked after checking them into library
Going soon to a disaster recovery test soon. and taking our copy storage pool tapes. I have a question about how the primary tapes get marked, was a bit fuzzy last time with my notes during the test. Background: TSM 5.3.2.2 AIX 5.3 - Op Sys Library at Sterling Forest: 3584 LTO 2 drives with LTO 2 tapes After the tsm db tape gets restoredand library, path, drives, library path are defined. 1. checkin libvol tapelib search=yes checklabel=barcode status=private 2. audit library tapelib checklabel=barcode 3.Mark all library volumes as reado 4. Mark Sequential Pools unavailable I think this should be damaged instead of unavailable, correct? Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Delete Filespace Command Question
Background: TSM Ver 5.3.2.2 Op Sys 5.3 NO HSM Just confirming from the admin guide.. Once I run a delete filespace node_name filespacename t=a command. The data is deleted from primary and copy pools. The only way I would get that data back would be in a TSM db restore...right? Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
DR Question - Wintel Servers
Trying to get a feel out in the TSM world of how many rely of us rely on only TSM for restoring Wintel Operating Systems verses using NT Backup Utility for Disaster Recovery. Background: TSM Server 5.3.2.2 :TSM Operating System AIX 5.3 125 Wintel Servers, Windows 2003 and Windows 2000, a couple WinNT TSM Versions , Mixed 5.3.2.2, 5.2.3.5, 5.2.2.0, 4.1.2.0, and 3.1.0.7 AIX - we use mksysb/nim Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
ANS1468E Backing up Automated System Recovery (ASR) files failed
TSM Background: TSM Server: 5.3.2.2 TSM Wintel Client Level: 5.3.2.2 Have restarted the sched service, permissions are fine. Trying to manually backup asr via command 'dsmc backup asr' to recreate the error.Just hanging on ASR backup. ANS1468E Backing up Automated System Recovery (ASR) files failed. No files will be backed up. Unhelpful, mystery message in the use of ASR, not documented in the Messages manual (try 'dsmc help'). See if there's anything wrong with the C:\adsm.sys\ASR staging directory - maybe even a space issue. Maybe try deleting \adsm.sys entirely and see if a fresh backup works. One customer reports this happening when the OS had a problem starting the Logical Disk Manager Administrative Service. (Look to see if you can see your disks in 'Disk Management') A restart cured the clog, and backups were fine after that. Another customer reports that appling fix level 5.3.2.2 eliminated the problem. Any suggestions? dsmerror.log on client failing on ASR backup: 05/04/2006 10:04:17 ConsoleEventHandler(): Caught Logoff console event . 05/04/2006 10:04:17 ConsoleEventHandler(): Process Detached. 05/04/2006 23:27:36 ANS1228E Sending of object 'C:' failed 05/04/2006 23:27:36 ANS1468E Backing up Automated System Recovery (ASR) files failed. No files will be backed up. 05/04/2006 23:31:12 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\fst02\c$\WINNT\system32\CPL.CFG' failed 05/04/2006 23:31:12 ANS4987E Error processing '\\fst02\c$\WINNT\system32\CPL.CFG': the object is in use by another process Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: ANS1468E Backing up Automated System Recovery (ASR) files failed
Hi Andrew, I meant to phrase my post as a asking a question..sorry about that. The client is Windows 2003, base level Ntbackup -ran fine ASR Wizard - waiting for mount message, hanging Thanks. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 05/05/2006 12:14 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: ANS1468E Backing up Automated System Recovery (ASR) files failed Nancy, from the way this is worded, it is not clear to me if *you* are asking the question, or answering someone's post, or if this was intended for someone else. - The ANS1468E message should be available in dsmc help. - ANS1468E is also available in the online Messages manual. Go to the TSM support page (see my sig below), then go to the bottom of that page and look for Information Center, which links to the online manuals. Follow that link, then enter ANS1468E in the search box on the left side of the page (above the Contents pane) and you should be able to pull up the message info. - Agreed that the message is probably not as helpful as it might be. - I suggest ensuring that this is not a Windows issue by running ntbackup, then run through the Automated System Recovery Wizard. If that falls over, then your problem is probably Windows-related. - On which specific Windows OS and SP does this occur? Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 2006-05-05 08:11:19: TSM Background: TSM Server: 5.3.2.2 TSM Wintel Client Level: 5.3.2.2 Have restarted the sched service, permissions are fine. Trying to manually backup asr via command 'dsmc backup asr' to recreate the error.Just hanging on ASR backup. ANS1468E Backing up Automated System Recovery (ASR) files failed. No files will be backed up. Unhelpful, mystery message in the use of ASR, not documented in the Messages manual (try 'dsmc help'). See if there's anything wrong with the C:\adsm.sys\ASR staging directory - maybe even a space issue. Maybe try deleting \adsm.sys entirely and see if a fresh backup works. One customer reports this happening when the OS had a problem starting the Logical Disk Manager Administrative Service. (Look to see if you can see your disks in 'Disk Management') A restart cured the clog, and backups were fine after that. Another customer reports that appling fix level 5.3.2.2 eliminated the problem. Any suggestions? dsmerror.log on client failing on ASR backup: 05/04/2006 10:04:17 ConsoleEventHandler(): Caught Logoff console event . 05/04/2006 10:04:17 ConsoleEventHandler(): Process Detached. 05/04/2006 23:27:36 ANS1228E Sending of object 'C:' failed 05/04/2006 23:27:36 ANS1468E Backing up Automated System Recovery (ASR) files failed. No files will be backed up. 05/04/2006 23:31:12 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\fst02\c$\WINNT\system32\CPL.CFG' failed 05/04/2006 23:31:12 ANS4987E Error processing '\\fst02\c$\WINNT\system32\CPL.CFG': the object is in use by another process Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
TSM for VMWare ESX Question - Where can I find the storage agent for TSM?
TSM Background: TSM Version 5.3.2.2 OS AIX 5.3 Mod 3 ESX Version - 2.5 then eventually upgrade to 3 Is there a TSM agent(for windows) to backup the guest os files, and if yes where is it located on the ftp site? Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: ANR8300E - I/O error on library desc= the destination slot or drive was full in an attemt to move a volume
Just an update... I had already tried auditing the library with checklabel=barcode for a first fix attempt and still saw the error.Yesterday afternoon working with ADIC tech support we ran an inventory process from the library side and then reran the audit on TSM server checklabel=barcodeand no errors after that. (fingers crossed) Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 04/10/2006 04:39 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: ANR8300E - I/O error on library desc= the destination slot or drive was full in an attemt to move a volume Been there - Done that. Seen it numerous times. Just perform an audit of your library, scanning the barcodes. There is an out-of-sync problem in the library inventory (internal). There is a tape who's barcode it didn't read during the last scan pass or you had some kind of library error. In fact, I just did one. AUDIT LIBR insert your library name here checkl=b Nancy L Backhaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 04/10/2006 03:15 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc Subject [ADSM-L] ANR8300E - I/O error on library desc= the destination slot or drive was full in an attemt to move a volume Anyone see this error below? Looking for direction/suggestions? The tape(s) do actually does dismount. The issue is occurring on different drives. All volumes are online, no unavail, no damaged, etc. I audited the library, it was a successful audit checklabel=barcode. **Background - Updated a week ago Library firmware from 3.1 to 4.1 and then backed out the library firmware code because internal barcode on the tapes could not be read. So we went back to our 3.1 firmware and thought we were ok again. Also, a couple other ADIC clients reported similiar issues with new firmware. Then we started seeing this error today with TSM sense data. Errpt - showing nothing Only TSM is reporting error, the library and aix are reporting no errors. Version: TSM Version - 5.3.2.2 AIX - 5.3 Mod 3 ADIC I2000 Scalar Library(LTO 2 drives), LTO2 tapes actlog: 04/10/06 13:16:44 ANR8300E I/O error on library BLUE (OP=6C03, CC=315, KEY=05, ASC=3B, ASCQ=0D, SENSE=70.00.05.00.00.00.00.0A.0- 0.00.00.00.3B.0D.00.CF.00.06., Description=The destination slot or drive was full in an attempt to move a volume). Refer to Appendix D in the 'Messages' manual for recommended action. (PROCESS: 302) 04/10/06 13:16:44 ANR8469E Dismount of LTO volume TS1430 from drive DRIVE13 (/dev/rmt13) in library BLUE01 failed. (PROCESS: 302) Sense Data= Key (05) = illegal request CC(315)= dest slot was full ASC=3B, ASCQ=OD = medium destination element is full Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
ANR8300E - I/O error on library desc= the destination slot or drive was full in an attemt to move a volume
Anyone see this error below? Looking for direction/suggestions? The tape(s) do actually does dismount. The issue is occurring on different drives. All volumes are online, no unavail, no damaged, etc. I audited the library, it was a successful audit checklabel=barcode. **Background - Updated a week ago Library firmware from 3.1 to 4.1 and then backed out the library firmware code because internal barcode on the tapes could not be read. So we went back to our 3.1 firmware and thought we were ok again. Also, a couple other ADIC clients reported similiar issues with new firmware. Then we started seeing this error today with TSM sense data. Errpt - showing nothing Only TSM is reporting error, the library and aix are reporting no errors. Version: TSM Version - 5.3.2.2 AIX - 5.3 Mod 3 ADIC I2000 Scalar Library(LTO 2 drives), LTO2 tapes actlog: 04/10/06 13:16:44 ANR8300E I/O error on library BLUE (OP=6C03, CC=315, KEY=05, ASC=3B, ASCQ=0D, SENSE=70.00.05.00.00.00.00.0A.0- 0.00.00.00.3B.0D.00.CF.00.06., Description=The destination slot or drive was full in an attempt to move a volume). Refer to Appendix D in the 'Messages' manual for recommended action. (PROCESS: 302) 04/10/06 13:16:44 ANR8469E Dismount of LTO volume TS1430 from drive DRIVE13 (/dev/rmt13) in library BLUE01 failed. (PROCESS: 302) Sense Data= Key (05) = illegal request CC(315)= dest slot was full ASC=3B, ASCQ=OD = medium destination element is full Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
5.2 and 5.3 ba clients - recommended defaults
Where do I find the recommended defaults for AIX and Window ba clients at client versions 5.2 and 5.3 on the IBM website. AIX client - TSM client version 5.2.2.0 dsmerror.log 04/02/06 04:38:38 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen proced ure. 04/02/06 04:38:39 ANS1809W Session is lost; initializing session reopen proced ure. 04/02/06 04:38:53 SetSocketOptions(): Warning. The TCP window size defined to ADSM is not supported by your system. It will be to set default size - 65536 Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Commands to kill migrations and sessions from connecting in the dsmserv.opt
MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.11 July 24, 2002 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Nancy L Backhaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:36:25 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NSB01/HealthNow(Release 6.5.4FP2|September 12, 2005) at 03/29/2006 01:36:29 PM, Serialize complete at 03/29/2006 01:36:29 PM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary==_alternative 0066363185257140_= This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 0066363185257140_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii What is the command to kill all migrations and sessions in the dsmserv,opt file. NoMig Something?? Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 --=_alternative 0066363185257140_= Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii brfont size=2 face=sans-serifWhat is the command to kill all migrations and nbsp;sessions in the dsmserv,opt file./font br brfont size=2 face=sans-serifNoMig Something??/font br br br brfont size=2 face=sans-serifNancy Backhausbr Enterprise Systemsbr HealthNow, NYbr 716-887-7979/font --=_alternative 0066363185257140_=-- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
ANS1950E -Backup using Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy Failed Error in Client 5.3.0
Hello, We are still seeing the shadow copy issue in 5.3.2.2. Anyone else still seeing the same issue or do I need to open a call with IBM? TSM Server - 5.3.2.2 Op System AIX 5.3 TSM Windows 2003 Client - 5.3.2.2 snipit from dsmerror.log 03/13/2006 00:11:31 CreateSnapshotSet(): pAsync-QueryStatus() returns hr=VSS_E_PROVIDER_VETO 03/13/2006 00:11:33 ANS1999E Incremental processing of '\\tsmclient\d$' stopped. 03/13/2006 00:11:33 ANS1950E Backup using Microsoft volume shadow copy failed. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems HealthNow, NY 716-887-7979 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: EMC Centera
I believe you have to have TSM DRP. We have recently implemented TSM, Content Manager OnDemand, and Centera as the storage device. Content Manager OnDemand controls the retention settings, and TSM is only the api to Centera. We have TSM Extended Edition. I believe in order for retention to be set in TSM, you need to purchase TSM DRP. I believe Centera has a base default setting, but in our environment we need at least 8 tiers of retention so we let Content Mgr OnDemand handle the retention. Spendlove, Ted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 01/18/2006 03:48 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:EMC Centera Hi team, We are in the process of testing an EMC Centera as a storage repository for TSM. We find the following snippet in: Technical Changes for Version 5 Release 2 -- January 2004 EMC Centera Support ... Centera devices can also be used as standard storage devices if no mandatory retention requirements exist for the data. ... We have no mandatory retention requirements We just want TSM to control retention like he always has on other devices. Now, by following the FM closely we are able to get data written to, read from, the Centera BUT when our storage admin types do their periodic housecleaning, unbeknown to TSM, all the TSM data is deleted. Apparently there is an attribute of deleteable or not deleteable somewhere in that box and TSM is not setting it. Anyone have any knowledge/advice on how to get TSM and EMC Centera to agree on retention controls? TIA, Ted Spendlove ATK Thiokol Propulsion CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Windows 2003 Domain Controller Restore Errors
Hello, Background: TSM Server 5.2.2.0 TSM is on AIX Op System - Version 5.3 Windows 2003 Domain Controller(no service packs), TSM Client Version 5.2.3.4 At our Disaster Recovery Site Test, and having a problem restoring system state. We can restore files but not system files. Those pools are drained completely, and even when we a couple days earlier than our recovery point, we still get the same error. It should be referencing the DR tapes. Any idea's Client TSM error log: 01/16/2006 21:32:07 ANS4035W File 'C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\COMPDB.xml' currently unavailable on server. 01/16/2006 21:32:07 Data unavailable to server 01/16/2006 21:32:07 ANS4035W File 'C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\NTDS.xml' currently unavailable on server. 01/16/2006 21:32:07 ANS4035W File 'C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\REGISTRY.xml' currently unavailable on server. 01/16/2006 21:32:07 ANS4035W File 'C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\SYSFILES.xml' currently unavailable on server. 01/16/2006 21:32:07 ANS4035W File 'C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\SYSVOL.xml' currently unavailable on server. 01/16/2006 21:32:08 ANS4035W File 'C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\tsm.xml' currently unavailable on server. 01/16/2006 21:32:08 LoadXmlDocument(): CreateFile(C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\tsm.xml): Win32 RC=3 01/16/2006 21:32:08 InitializeVss(): Failed to read backup components document C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\tsm.xml into memory. 01/16/2006 21:32:08 ANS1949E Initialize Microsoft Volume Snapshot failed. 01/16/2006 21:32:08 Restoring system object 'SYSSTATE' failed with rc=4341. Processing stop. 01/16/2006 21:32:08 Data unavailable to server 01/16/2006 21:32:08 Data unavailable to server 01/16/2006 21:32:08 Data unavailable to server 01/16/2006 21:32:08 Data unavailable to server 01/16/2006 21:32:08 Data unavailable to server 01/16/2006 21:32:10 ANS1949E Initialize Microsoft Volume Snapshot failed. TSM ActLog - ANR1421W - Read access denied vof volume diskpoolxx ANR0556W - Retrieve or Restore failed for session 3661 for node JOEV(winnt) - storage volume UNKNOWN inaccessible (sess3661) ANR4035W -(Session 3661,node JOE(winnt)- Error processing 'C:adsm.sys\xml.state\NTDS.xml': file currently unavailable on SERVER. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Windows 2003 Domain Controller Restore Errors
We brought all of our DR(copypool tapes) with us. I was cheating and draining our disk pool all last week, so that we wouldn't run into this problem. Anyone have a quick select statement where I could find a particular file and which Dr tape has it(or not). Henrik Wahlstedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 01/17/2006 11:36 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: Windows 2003 Domain Controller Restore Errors I like this one.. storage volume UNKNOWN inaccessible Since TSM cant mount the diskpool volume, are you sure that ALL data is in the copypool? And if the data is in the copypool, is that tape TSM requests available? //Henrik -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy L Backhaus Sent: 17. januar 2006 17:15 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Windows 2003 Domain Controller Restore Errors Hello, Background: TSM Server 5.2.2.0 TSM is on AIX Op System - Version 5.3 Windows 2003 Domain Controller(no service packs), TSM Client Version 5.2.3.4 At our Disaster Recovery Site Test, and having a problem restoring system state. We can restore files but not system files. Those pools are drained completely, and even when we a couple days earlier than our recovery point, we still get the same error. It should be referencing the DR tapes. Any idea's Client TSM error log: 01/16/2006 21:32:07 ANS4035W File 'C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\COMPDB.xml' currently unavailable on server. 01/16/2006 21:32:07 Data unavailable to server 01/16/2006 21:32:07 ANS4035W File 'C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\NTDS.xml' currently unavailable on server. 01/16/2006 21:32:07 ANS4035W File 'C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\REGISTRY.xml' currently unavailable on server. 01/16/2006 21:32:07 ANS4035W File 'C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\SYSFILES.xml' currently unavailable on server. 01/16/2006 21:32:07 ANS4035W File 'C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\SYSVOL.xml' currently unavailable on server. 01/16/2006 21:32:08 ANS4035W File 'C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\tsm.xml' currently unavailable on server. 01/16/2006 21:32:08 LoadXmlDocument(): CreateFile(C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\tsm.xml): Win32 RC=3 01/16/2006 21:32:08 InitializeVss(): Failed to read backup components document C:\adsm.sys\xml.state\tsm.xml into memory. 01/16/2006 21:32:08 ANS1949E Initialize Microsoft Volume Snapshot failed. 01/16/2006 21:32:08 Restoring system object 'SYSSTATE' failed with rc=4341. Processing stop. 01/16/2006 21:32:08 Data unavailable to server 01/16/2006 21:32:08 Data unavailable to server 01/16/2006 21:32:08 Data unavailable to server 01/16/2006 21:32:08 Data unavailable to server 01/16/2006 21:32:08 Data unavailable to server 01/16/2006 21:32:10 ANS1949E Initialize Microsoft Volume Snapshot failed. TSM ActLog - ANR1421W - Read access denied vof volume diskpoolxx ANR0556W - Retrieve or Restore failed for session 3661 for node JOEV(winnt) - storage volume UNKNOWN inaccessible (sess3661) ANR4035W -(Session 3661,node JOE(winnt)- Error processing 'C:adsm.sys\xml.state\NTDS.xml': file currently unavailable on SERVER. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. --- The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete this message. Thank you.
Adding additional sticker to lto tapes for Disaster Recovery Test
Hello, We have a disaster recovery test scheduled soon for IBM Sterling Forest, NY site. We have been asked to add an additional sticker to all our LTO 1 and LTO2 tapes as a unique identifier for the disaster recovery test(about 600 tapes) while at the DR test site besides the barcode label. We will be using a 3584 Library - LTO 2 drives for the recovery test. I talked to our library vendor, who suggested adding the labels to the top of the lto 2 tapes, and that the additional label doesn't pose any problem as long as it isn't a barcode type label and that the label of course is stuck on correctly to the tape. I believe the identifier would be our DR contract number(have to confirm that). Wondering if anyone else has had to do this for a dr test, any issues, recommendations? TSM Version 5.2.3.5 Operating System - AIX 5.3 Mod 2 ADIC I2000 Library -LTO 2 drives Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Adding additional sticker to lto tapes for Disaster Recovery Test
David, Thank You for your help. I guess I will have to order a couple of silver sharpies. Sterling Forest is requesting us to put our contract number, but we might put something like our complany name on them( HN, WNY) so that we don't have to do this again if we switch dr sites. Thanks again. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/13/2005 01:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: Adding additional sticker to lto tapes for Disaster Recovery Test This has been discussed some from time to time. Basically, as I remember, two conclusions. 1. Don't put ANY labels on tapes except the original barcode labels. Anything else has the potential to jam tape drives or robot mechanism. 2. I believe some folks have used some type of felt tip pen of various colors (to stand out from color of LTO tape case) to make some markings on the tape case. David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5509 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/13/05 12:16 PM Hello, We have a disaster recovery test scheduled soon for IBM Sterling Forest, NY site. We have been asked to add an additional sticker to all our LTO 1 and LTO2 tapes as a unique identifier for the disaster recovery test(about 600 tapes) while at the DR test site besides the barcode label. We will be using a 3584 Library - LTO 2 drives for the recovery test. I talked to our library vendor, who suggested adding the labels to the top of the lto 2 tapes, and that the additional label doesn't pose any problem as long as it isn't a barcode type label and that the label of course is stuck on correctly to the tape. I believe the identifier would be our DR contract number(have to confirm that). Wondering if anyone else has had to do this for a dr test, any issues, recommendations? TSM Version 5.2.3.5 Operating System - AIX 5.3 Mod 2 ADIC I2000 Library -LTO 2 drives Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ## This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. ##
Re: Adding additional sticker to lto tapes for Disaster Recovery Test
Originally we were talking about shipping the tapes, but now we are gonna hand carry the tapes. We are confirming this procedure with Sterling Forest. Thanks for your response. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 Kauffman, Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 12/13/2005 02:35 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: Adding additional sticker to lto tapes for Disaster Recovery Test Nancy, is this because you're shipping the tapes or some such? We've done several tests at Sterling Forest and never needed to do this, but we hand-carry our tapes (about 145, mixed LTO1 and LTO2). I'd hit up your project manager to come up with an IBM-approved method (the silver marker sounds like the best to me). Tom Kauffman NIBCO, Inc -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy L Backhaus Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 12:17 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Adding additional sticker to lto tapes for Disaster Recovery Test Hello, We have a disaster recovery test scheduled soon for IBM Sterling Forest, NY site. We have been asked to add an additional sticker to all our LTO 1 and LTO2 tapes as a unique identifier for the disaster recovery test(about 600 tapes) while at the DR test site besides the barcode label. We will be using a 3584 Library - LTO 2 drives for the recovery test. I talked to our library vendor, who suggested adding the labels to the top of the lto 2 tapes, and that the additional label doesn't pose any problem as long as it isn't a barcode type label and that the label of course is stuck on correctly to the tape. I believe the identifier would be our DR contract number(have to confirm that). Wondering if anyone else has had to do this for a dr test, any issues, recommendations? TSM Version 5.2.3.5 Operating System - AIX 5.3 Mod 2 ADIC I2000 Library -LTO 2 drives Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: %.2 GUI issue after aix 5.2 to 5.3 upgrade
I had a PMR opened and received this response from support... The efix exposed a code error in TSM. APAR IC47636 has been opened for this issue. The fix is anticipated, no guarantees, subject to change, at the discretion of IBM, to be in TSM 5.2.7 set for 12/16/05. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 Ben Bullock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 11/04/2005 02:51 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: %.2 GUI issue after aix 5.2 to 5.3 upgrade Yes, that behavior has been discussed on the listserv about a month ago. I believe someone had an APAR open on it with IBM. I believe we were guessing that it was a problem with something in the 5.3 ML2 files that caused the different behavior on the windowing. Look through the archives for the exact details. Ben -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Hughes Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 12:41 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: %.2 GUI issue after aix 5.2 to 5.3 upgrade Hello, We just upgraded from AIX 5.2 to 5.3 and after bringing back up TSM to check things. When we click on a object on the tree (using the 5.2 Gui) a new window pops up? Has anyone ever experienced this issue? Thanks in advance! AIX 5.3 TSM 5.3.1.4 (using 5.2 GUI) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Upgrade to TSM 5.3 w/ TSM 5.2 Web interface messes up admin windo w frame
I believe IBM TSM is working on this. I opened a PMR with TSM, and the support person stated that there are 5 other new pmrs on this same issue. I am awaiting feedback from TSM support on this issue. We are at TSM Version 5.2.3.5, AIX OS Level 5.3 Mod 2 - We just upgraded the AIX OS to 5.3 Mod 3 on Mondayand the same issue is now occuring in our environment. With the operations results opening in a seperate frame. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 Ben Bullock [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 10/05/2005 10:40 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: Upgrade to TSM 5.3 w/ TSM 5.2 Web interface messes up admin windo w frame Interesting, I have done the same thing in our AIX test environment in preparation to go to TSM 5.3 and have exactly the same thing. Funny thing is that we have done the same thing on our test Solaris TSM server and it worked fine. Is you installation on AIX 5.3 also? I was wondering if there was some prereq fileset that is missing or something... Ben -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Schneider Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 8:06 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Upgrade to TSM 5.3 w/ TSM 5.2 Web interface messes up admin windo w frame Greetings, I posted this to the list last week, but for some reason I have not been getting the digest, so I decided I better post it again in case people replied and I didn't get it. Sorry for the redundant traffic. I just upgraded a AIX 5.3 TSM server to TSM 5.3.1.6 and also installed the migration TSM 5.2 Web interface. The 5.2 Web interface basically works, but the center frame is missing. The left hand navigation bar is correct, but when I open up something that should produce content in the center frame, instead it opens a whole new window and puts the content there. I can limp along with this behavior, but it is annoying to have to go back and forth between two windows. This happens on every browser we try, both Explorer and Netscape, so it isn't tied to the browser I don't think. If this is an old topic I am sorry, I looked for it on the archives and couldn't find it. I have trouble believing it is happening to us, but no one else. Best Regards, John D. Schneider Technology Consultant CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Centera TSM Setup Information
Hello. Looking for setup information on TSM(AIX O/S) and EMC Centera? I did find some info on the Tivoli IBM website, but looking for more setup, best practices, gotchas'.. Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
What are the correct steps when moving slots from one partition to 2nd partition
TSM Version 5.2.3.5 AIX O/S 5.3 Library - ADIC I2000 Scalar, partitioned library,10 drive 2 drive IBM drives -LTO 2 We had to move slots over from one partition to the other(due to high utilization), pending slot/drive order. What is the correct procedure? Steps: Killed all processes/sessions audited the library (audit library ltolib checklabel=barcode, it was a successful) halted tsm(both instances) Library partitions taken offline Vendor changed slots TSM brought up show slots library - recognized the 24 new slots, but showed the slots being unavailable(only the new ones) ran an audit-the audit failed(couldn't recognize the new slots) We then redefined the library, and restarted tsm, then started processes, but then tapes wouldn't mount, although the library client would show the tapes in the drive. I killed the processes, but the process wouldn't complete until the tape eventually did mount in the drive, then the process would cancel. We reran the audit library- this time it show the new slots(barcode something -looked better than unavailable) then re-ran the audit, it was successful ,but still the tapes wouldn't mount So the library vendor had to reboot the i/o blade, kicked off a process...and the tape mounted quickly after that. It appears that I missed a step somewhere(although IBM stated that was the correct procedure, and that pending the library model, the library might need to be rebooted). Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Anyone backing up Cisco Unity Product to TSM (Voicemail only)
I should have been more clear in my original email(sorry about that). I guess our network engineers know that Veritas is their only tested/certified solution, but wondering if anyone is backing up Cisco Unity with TSM. I am going to call IBM support now. Our Network Engineer reply, That very point was the go-around we had with Cisco and DiData. At this point, Cisco's position is that any solution can be used, but it is up to the customer to make sure it works, and if it causes problems on the Unity Server, they will require it to be removed before offering support. Veritas Backup Exec is their only tested/verified solution to date. Feedback much appreciated. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 TSM_User [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 08/04/2005 08:07 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: Anyone backing up Cisco Unity Product to TSM (Voicemail only) This list is the 3rd party software that the CSA agent for Unity supports. REF: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps2237/prod_release_note09186a0080424e37.html Supported Optional Software Only the following optional software has been qualified for use on a Cisco Unity server that is running Cisco Security Agent for Cisco Unity: ?Adobe Acrobat Reader, version 4 and later. ?McAfee NetShield for Microsoft Windows NT and Windows 2000, version 4.5 and later. ?Trend Micro ?ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange 2000, version 5 and later. ?ServerProtect for Microsoft Windows, version 5.5 ?Symantec ?AntiVirus Corporate Edition, version 8.1 and later. ?Norton AntiVirus for Microsoft Windows NT and Windows 2000, version 5.02 and later. ?VERITAS ?Backup Exec for Microsoft Windows NT and Windows 2000, version 8.6. ?NetBackup, version 4.5 and later. ?Windows Automatic Update. It must be configured not to automatically download updates to the Cisco Unity server. ?WinZip, version 7 and later Brents, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Per Cisco, TSM is not a supported backup software for Unity servers. The supported backup software are Veritas BackupExec 8.5 or NetBackup 4.5 and later. Regards, James -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy L Backhaus Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 2:28 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Anyone backing up Cisco Unity Product to TSM (Voicemail only) Hello, I have been instructed to find out if there is any other TSM environments backing up Cisco Unity for voicemail to TSM. Looking for feedback on any gotcha's, whitepaper, info, etc. I looked and didn't find any info on Tivoli IBM site, ADSM site. Background: Cisco Unity Cisco Unity Version - 4.0.5 On Box Message Store Combination of anExchange Server(Win2003) + SQL Server(Win2000) Will be installing TSM Client Version 5.2.3.5 Estimation of backup -140 gig Background: TSM TSM Server 5.2.3.5 Op System AIX 5.2 Mod 2 Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. - Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
Anyone backing up Cisco Unity Product to TSM (Voicemail only)
Hello, I have been instructed to find out if there is any other TSM environments backing up Cisco Unity for voicemail to TSM. Looking for feedback on any gotcha's, whitepaper, info, etc. I looked and didn't find any info on Tivoli IBM site, ADSM site. Background: Cisco Unity Cisco Unity Version - 4.0.5 On Box Message Store Combination of anExchange Server(Win2003) + SQL Server(Win2000) Will be installing TSM Client Version 5.2.3.5 Estimation of backup -140 gig Background: TSM TSM Server 5.2.3.5 Op System AIX 5.2 Mod 2 Thank You. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
ANS1017E (RC-50) Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure
Background - TSM Server 5.2.3.5 Oper System - 5.2 Mod 2 AIX Client Involved - TSM client version, 5.2.2.0. AIX oper system 5.2 mod 2 SQL Backtrack Version- 4.4.10.2 Yesterday, we received ANS1017E (-50) message with a sybase backup(2nd time error occurred a couple of months ago with a db2 database) backup which are started by a external scheduler where the client script initiates the backup(daily job). The backup jobs fail to start and the script reports back to the operator that it failed. After a retry the job works fine. The backup goes to disk pool first, then we backup to tape later. Any idea's what is causing this? I looked at the act log - no errors or warnings that I can see. No idletimeout warnings, I could see the client session open and close within a couple of minutes. The dsmierror log, showed no errors too. No higher priority warnings. error *** Started on 05/23/05 12:02:17 obsi/adsm: FATAL: TSM: dsmInit failed, return code: ANS1017E (RC-50) Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure [dtsdump 197296] Terminating program; please wait. obsi/adsm: FATAL: TSM: dsmInit failed, return code: ANS1017E (RC-50) Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure obsi/adsm: FATAL: TSM: dsmInit failed, return code: ANS1017E (RC-50) Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure [dtsdump 197296] DT-04892F: Program terminated (signal=15). [dtsdump 197296] [dtsdump 197296] *** This program has been terminated. [dtsdump 197296] *** This program did NOT complete successfully. [dtsdump 198990] DT-04893F: Dump/Load command process terminated (signal=15). [dtsdump 198990] [dtsdump 198990] *** This program has been terminated. [dtsdump 198990] *** This program did NOT complete successfully. [dtsdump 186724] DT-04894F: Stripe process terminated (signal=15). [dtsdump 186724] [dtsdump 186724] *** This program has been terminated. [dtsdump 186724] *** This program did NOT complete successfully. [dtsdump 130824] DT-04894F: Stripe process terminated (signal=15). DT-04334W: OBSI driver returned file name when backup process had already completed. *** finished on 05/23/05 12:02:28 *** 1 control file processed *** elapsed time was 11 seconds *** highest return code was 3 *** backup completed with errors Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: CX700 ATA failure - Audit Storage Pool Volumes - Update
Here's the update of our events last night...sorry I didn't respond back last night, a bit busy :-) EMC came back and stated that there were bad sectors in the luns...9 volumes were 'toast' (900 gig overall in volume group) EMC rebuilt the luns effected Brought TSM back up, 9 volumes marked off-line jfs logs rebuilt disabled all sessions, except for a couple of effected 4 servers that had to have data restored (TSM Server down for some time) We ended up with the decision to delete volumes involved, then create new volumes finally started backups AIX Engineers and EMC evaluating the cause of issue 2 drives down. Thank You to all who responded! Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 TSM_User [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 05/04/2005 06:54 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:Re: CX700 ATA failure - Audit Storage Pool Volumes We lost 2 drives in the same array on a CX600 and they wouldn't rebuild. Our problem did not cause a loss of data. EMC had to bring down the whole thing and when it came back up the rebuild kicked off and everything was OK. We were told that if we had a more recent version of microcode then the rebuild would have worked from the start. Bottom line wait until EMC is done before you do anything because you may not have lost any data. Steve Schaub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, make sure the drives were really bad - we had this happen to us on a cx500 and it turned out that the microcode was actually bad, and the 2nd raid5 disk failure was phony. Have your ce double check this - we lost tons of data from this little glitch biting us several days in a row before they figured it out (when it did come back up the volumes were toast). -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy L Backhaus Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:09 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] CX700 ATA failure - Audit Storage Pool Volumes TSM Server 5.2.3.5 AIX Operating System 5.2 We have lost two drives on a single ATA RAID array. EMC CE is on site and working with the EMC SAC to resolve the problem. We brought TSM Server down while EMC is working on the issue. I started receiving the following errors before we stop all processes, backups, migrations marking the effected diskpool volumes read-only. 05/04/05 09:06:36 ANR1411W Access mode for volume /tsmpool39/diskpool22a now set to read-only due to write error. (SESSION: 125991) My question is When we bring the server back up. I want to ensure that I am doing the right thing, or if I am missing anything. 1. I will need to make sure the volumes affected are online and in a read/write status. 2. Audit diskpools volumes, Inspect only first 3. If there are damaged volumes,rerun audit volume, with Fix=Yes. 4. Suggestions? Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail disclaimer: http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
CX700 ATA failure - Audit Storage Pool Volumes
TSM Server 5.2.3.5 AIX Operating System 5.2 We have lost two drives on a single ATA RAID array. EMC CE is on site and working with the EMC SAC to resolve the problem. We brought TSM Server down while EMC is working on the issue. I started receiving the following errors before we stop all processes, backups, migrations marking the effected diskpool volumes read-only. 05/04/05 09:06:36 ANR1411W Access mode for volume /tsmpool39/diskpool22a now set to read-only due to write error. (SESSION: 125991) My question is When we bring the server back up. I want to ensure that I am doing the right thing, or if I am missing anything. 1. I will need to make sure the volumes affected are online and in a read/write status. 2. Audit diskpools volumes, Inspect only first 3. If there are damaged volumes,rerun audit volume, with Fix=Yes. 4. Suggestions? Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
CX700 ATA failure - Audit Storage Pool Volumes
Primary Pool Disk - so if I have to run a fix=yes, there is 'NO' copy in a backup poo,, I would then have to rerun the backups. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 - Forwarded by Nancy L Backhaus/HealthNow on 05/04/2005 01:12 PM - Nancy L Backhaus 05/04/2005 01:09 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU cc: Subject:CX700 ATA failure - Audit Storage Pool Volumes TSM Server 5.2.3.5 AIX Operating System 5.2 We have lost two drives on a single ATA RAID array. EMC CE is on site and working with the EMC SAC to resolve the problem. We brought TSM Server down while EMC is working on the issue. I started receiving the following errors before we stop all processes, backups, migrations marking the effected diskpool volumes read-only. 05/04/05 09:06:36 ANR1411W Access mode for volume /tsmpool39/diskpool22a now set to read-only due to write error. (SESSION: 125991) My question is When we bring the server back up. I want to ensure that I am doing the right thing, or if I am missing anything. 1. I will need to make sure the volumes affected are online and in a read/write status. 2. Audit diskpools volumes, Inspect only first 3. If there are damaged volumes,rerun audit volume, with Fix=Yes. 4. Suggestions? Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Feedback - how are you using email archiving?
Background: TSM Server 5.2.3.5 AIX Op System 5.2.2.0, P650 box Library -ADIC I2000 Scaler, LTO 2 Drives Looking for feedback from the group. We have currently have a partioned library, 10 drives for all our system backup. The other library partition, with 2 drives for content manager. We are using content manager, via common store for email archiving. The problem is when there is a problem with the tape, there are thousands of small files on tape..and the restore of the tape is taking 20 hours to move the data off a tape. Seems that using LTO tape is not the answer with all of thousands of individual emails on one tape. Business SLA for email archiving is 24 hours. We are looking at increasing our disk pools, and keep all data on the disk...and of course, still keep offsite copy for DR purposes at this point. Interested in any suggestions? What are you doing for email archiving? Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138TO CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Excluding Directory Question?
Looking for help to exclude the following directory from our remote servers. Background Info- TSM Server: Version 5.2.3.5 AIX 5.2 Client: Win2003 Server Version 5.2.3.5 Tried this to no avail. Exclude.dir D:\DFSroot Exclude.dir ?:\DFSroot Exclude.dir \\fso01\d$\dfsroot\ Exclude ?:\DFSroot\* Exclude.dir ?:\dfsroot Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Backup - View data that was backed up
Background TSM - 5.2.3.5 AIX- 5.2 Mod 4 One of our client admins just recently installed sql backtrack obsi module on one of our windows server for testing (node name - dbb05). The backup is working fine , but I do not know how to view/verify that the backups are going to the new storage pools(example: apidisk1) that I set up for this . Today, the admin performed a successful manual backup. Now I want to view where that data was backed up to. The filename: \\dbb05\d$\runbook. I can query the contents in each of the storage pool volumes, but not finding anything? Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
ANR8311E Error -What does FLUSH operation mean?
Background: TSM Server 5.2.3.5 AIX OS 5.2 Library-ADIC I2000 Scaler (LTO 2 Drives) Receiving this error intermittently on both partitions of TSM on LTO1 tapes(Imation) and new LTO 2(fuji) tapes ...TSM generates the ANR8311E message on a brand new LTO 2 tape in our 2nd instance of TSM. AIX, errpt reports a ADSM_DD_LOG2 error, and the Library typically doesn't report any errors. All our firmware is up to date. There is a posting on the tsm quick fact sight...but, can someone tell me what the FLUSH operation part means? Error occurred during disk to copy pool migration. All the data was moved to another scratch tape successfully. ANR8311E An I/O error occurred while accessing drive DRIVE1 (/dev/rmt2) for FLUSH operation, errno = 78. (PROCESS:238) Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: ANR8311E Error -What does FLUSH operation mean?
We have already switched the scsi cables, but I can re-visit it again. The vendor looks at the drive snapshots..when the error occurs..and everything looks fine on their end. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/17/2004 03:21 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: ANR8311E Error -What does FLUSH operation mean? Nancy - A Flush operation refers to writing to tape all the data which the tape drive has buffered...a sync operation. Sounds like you have a drive problem. But I've experienced what seem to be drive problems when the actual problem was a cable or SCSI terminator. (We had what looked like a drive problem for about a year: switching the terminator caused the problem to go away. Lesson: never overlook trivial causes.) Richard Sims CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Just upgraded to 5.2.3.5 -License Issue
Background: AIX Operating System 5.2 Mod 4 TSM 5.2.3.5 After bring up TSM, getting the following error in actlog.. 12/15/04 10:11:30 ANR9613W Error loading ./dsmlicense for Licensing functio n: Exec format error. I then was going to register a license...I receive the following error when registering any license. IBM website has the following posted. What am I missing? ANR2852I Current license information: BLANK ANR2853I New license information: BLANK ANR2812W License Audit completed - ATTENTION: Server is NOT in compliance with license terms. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Just upgraded to 5.2.3.5 -License Issue
upgraded 5.2.3.3 5.2.3.5 lslpp -l tivoli.tsm.license.* showing... Path: /usr/lib/objrepos tivoli.tsm.license.aix5.rte64 5.2.0.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage M License Registration tivoli.tsm.license.cert5.2.0.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage M License Certificates Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 - Forwarded by Nancy L Backhaus/HealthNow on 12/15/2004 10:51 AM - Nancy L Backhaus 12/15/2004 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Just upgraded to 5.2.3.5 -License Issue Background: AIX Operating System 5.2 Mod 4 TSM 5.2.3.5 After bring up TSM, getting the following error in actlog.. 12/15/04 10:11:30 ANR9613W Error loading ./dsmlicense for Licensing functio n: Exec format error. I then was going to register a license...I receive the following error when registering any license. IBM website has the following posted. What am I missing? ANR2852I Current license information: BLANK ANR2853I New license information: BLANK ANR2812W License Audit completed - ATTENTION: Server is NOT in compliance with license terms. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Just upgraded to 5.2.3.5 -License Issue
please disregard , fileset tivoli.tsm.license.rte needed to be loaded. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 - Forwarded by Nancy L Backhaus/HealthNow on 12/15/2004 11:36 AM - Nancy L Backhaus 12/15/2004 10:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Just upgraded to 5.2.3.5 -License Issue upgraded 5.2.3.3 5.2.3.5 lslpp -l tivoli.tsm.license.* showing... Path: /usr/lib/objrepos tivoli.tsm.license.aix5.rte64 5.2.0.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage M License Registration tivoli.tsm.license.cert5.2.0.0 COMMITTED IBM Tivoli Storage M License Certificates Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 - Forwarded by Nancy L Backhaus/HealthNow on 12/15/2004 10:51 AM - Nancy L Backhaus 12/15/2004 10:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Just upgraded to 5.2.3.5 -License Issue Background: AIX Operating System 5.2 Mod 4 TSM 5.2.3.5 After bring up TSM, getting the following error in actlog.. 12/15/04 10:11:30 ANR9613W Error loading ./dsmlicense for Licensing functio n: Exec format error. I then was going to register a license...I receive the following error when registering any license. IBM website has the following posted. What am I missing? ANR2852I Current license information: BLANK ANR2853I New license information: BLANK ANR2812W License Audit completed - ATTENTION: Server is NOT in compliance with license terms. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Select Statement Help for Volume Breakdown
How do I combine these two scripts? I want to be able to see a breakdown by stg pools breakdown of scratch/privates in the stgpools. select status, count(*) from libvolumes where library_name = 'LTOLIB' group by status I have this..but, I really want to see the scratch/private breakdown? select stgpool_name, status, scratch, count(*) as Volumes - from volumes - group by status, scratch, stgpool_name STGPOOL_NAME STATUS SCRATCH Volumes -- -- -- --- APIDR1 EMPTY YES 2 BCBSDR2EMPTY YES 1 APIDR1 FILLINGYES13 APIDR2 FILLINGYES12 Background: Operating Sys - AIX 5.2.2.0 TSM- 5.2.3.3 Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: TSM server 5.2.3.4 removed from ftp site
We too ran 5.2.3.4 for 3 weeks before crashing once actually on 11/10. Once we heard that the patch was pulled from the site fix wasn't due out until 11/22 we opted to go back to 5.2.3.3 for our environment. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 David E Ehresman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/17/2004 11:53 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: TSM server 5.2.3.4 removed from ftp site Charles, We ran at 5.2.3.4 for about 3 weeks before we experienced our first crash. David [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/17/2004 10:29:43 AM I've been searching IBM's Web for IC43445... And no hits, we just updated two AIX TSM servers to 5.2.3.4... Are we screwed? Thanks -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM server 5.2.3.4 removed from ftp site Would you expect 5.2.3.5 to have a fix for IC43445? Yes! Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Where did my scratch tapes go?
Update... TSM - Version 5.2.3.4 AIX Operating System - Version 5.2.2.0 Thank You who all replied and the suggestions. Found the scratch tapes...we had implemented new stg pools(disk/tape) 2 weeks ago, one of our scripts did not have all the new dr pool logic in it...ooops. But, my next question is regarding trending..date stamp of my tape types, scratch, private, on-site,off-site, unavail, reado..and would like to see the breakdown in my stgpools...then import it into excel...to see a graph at any given time to see what pools are using what tapes. Right now I look at the actlog daily for issues. I am a beginner in SQL statements(arrgghh), and just got a book on KornShell. Looking to see what is recommended by other TSMers? What are other AIX folks using for trending? I have this sql..which helps. select stgpool_name, count(*) from volumes group by stgpool_name Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/05/2004 02:07 PM To: Nancy L Backhaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Where did my scratch tapes go? On Nov 5, 2004, at 1:59 PM, Nancy L Backhaus wrote: 2 libraries - one scratch count is steady, my LTOLIB library scratch count is too low, privates too high. What is happening? Where do I begin looking? Nancy - Try Shrinking (dwindling) number of available scratch tapes (tape leak) in http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts to start with. Richard CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
How to remove a single file from a TSM backup tape volume
Hello, Another question... Background: TSM Storage Manager: Version 5.2.3.4 AIX OpSystem: 5.2.2.0 I have a customer that is requesting that 2 files be permanently removed from TSM(classified type file)...including tape backup(which will be on tape for 180 days). Now I found the technote on Tivoli website - of the How to delete the file from tapeHas anyone tried that suggestion? I also checked the adsm.quickfacts sight... Search on ' File, selectively delete from *SM' -unsupported method, which looks like the IBM suggestion above. and the standard method. I am gonna try the standard method(seems like less steps too) but was curious if anyone tried the IBM suggestion? Thanks Again ;-) Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: How to remove a single file from a TSM backup tape volume
Thank You very much Neil. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 Neil Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/10/2004 09:26 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: How to remove a single file from a TSM backup tape volume Nancy I've used the unsupported DELETE OBJECT and would endorse the statement Richard makes in his Quick Facts - namely that it does not update all the necessary tables to fully remove the object from the TSM server. When I subsequently ran an AUDITDB on the database, inconsistencies were flagged up for that OBJECT_ID. I was using it to delete TDP for Oracle backups that the RMAN catalogue had 'forgotten' about, but with a file system client, I would recommend following the advice in IBM technote # 1166278. Regards Neil Schofield Yorkshire Water Services Ltd Are you drinking enough water? Find out more on our new website designed for children, http://www.cool-fuel.com The information in this e-mail is confidential and may also be legally privileged. The contents are intended for recipient only and are subject to the legal notice available at http://www.keldagroup.com/email.htm Yorkshire Water Services Limited Registered Office Western House Halifax Road Bradford BD6 2SZ Registered in England and Wales No 2366682
Where did my scratch tapes go?
Hello, Background: TSM Version 5.2.3.4 AIX Operating System Version 5.2.2.0 2 libraries - one scratch count is steady, my LTOLIB library scratch count is too low, privates too high. What is happening? Where do I begin looking? 11/04/04 STATUS Unnamed[2] -- --- Cleaner 1 Private350 Scratch 24 10/04/04 STATUS Unnamed[2] -- --- Cleaner 1 Private250 Scratch 59 Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
How to determine sense code means?
Background: TSM Version 5.2.3.4
Op System: AIX 5.1.5.0
Library: Adic Scaler, I200, partioned library, (12 drives)
I am trying to figure out what this error means in the AIX, errpt.
ADSM_DD_LOG4, looks like when our librarians are opening the bulk door for
the one library (no biggie, more informational). But, the message is
also occurring off hours on the 2nd instance of TSM. I want to rule out
any issues between the partitions. So, I want to understand the Sense
Code?
LABEL: ADSM_DD_LOG4
IDENTIFIER: 4225DB66
Date/Time: Wed Oct 27 08:29:11 EDT
Sequence Number: 11316
Machine Id: 000B9DCC4C00
Node Id: tsmaix
Class: H
Type:TEMP
Resource Name: lb1
Resource Class: library
Resource Type: TSM-FCSCSI
Location:2d-08-01
Description
OPERATOR INTERVENTION REQUIRED
Probable Causes
ATTACHED SCSI TARGET DEVICE
Failure Causes
ATTACHED SCSI TARGET DEVICE
Recommended Actions
CORRECT THEN RETRY
CHECK POWER
CHECK PHYSICAL INSTALLATION
Detail Data
COMMAND
0C00 A500 0001 0107 100C
STATUS CODE
SENSE DATA
0102 F000 0600 010A 2801
ERROR CODE
0
RETURN CODE
0
REFERENCE CODE
Nancy Backhaus
Enterprise Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (716) 887-7979
Cell: (716) 609-2138
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a
person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please
contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
message.
Re: How to determine sense code means?
I looked at the activity log for the 2nd instance of TSM at the time of the error is occurring at night. Its only occurring on off hours for that 2nd instance, which brought me back to the act log. It looks like when our content manager(NODE9CM), starts it's session, the error/message occurs. This instance isn't seeing any activity right now between 6pm-10pm. So, after being idle, maybe this message is letting me know, that the 2nd library is waking up? But, I have to agree, that I like Richards' idea of get a video cam in-house to see what really goes on off hours in our Operations area...hahahaha. Date/Time Message -- 10/26/04 22:03:19 ANR0406I Session 1363 started for node NODE9CM (ICMRM) (T cp/Ip cmaix(43250)). (SESSION: 1363) 10/26/04 22:03:38 ANR8337I LTO volume CM0022 mounted in drive DRIVE2 (/dev/ rmt3). (SESSION: 1363) Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/27/2004 02:26 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: How to determine sense code means? ... But, the message is also occurring off hours on the 2nd instance of TSM. ... As odd as it sounds to suggest it, there are some situations where one has to train a video camera on the hardware and see what unusual things are done off-shift. Richard Sims CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Versions Data Exists Question
Our management class is setup that the maximum number of versions permitted is 3, I have a customer requesting that wants to know if can keep let's say...6 active versions of only one particular file on a server. Is that even possible? Background: TSM Server Version 5.2.3.4 AIX Operating System: 5.1.5 Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Strange admin id -How do I get rid of it?
Hello, Background info. TSM Version 5.2.3 AIX operation system 5.1.5. I started seeing these errors in my activity log past couple of days? This admin id was not registered(obviously from the text) We had bounced our server yesterday for maintenance on our library, I thought it might clear up then...it didn't. The sessions, don't exist to cancel. Any idea's on how I get rid of it? Date/Time Message -- 10/20/04 07:09:53 ANR0423W Session 43880 for administrator §A¥Q `¥Q ( ) refused - administrator name not registered. (SESSION: 43880) 10/20/04 07:29:53 ANR0423W Session 43942 for administrator §A¥Q `¥Q ( ) refused - administrator name not registered. (SESSION: 43942) 10/20/04 07:49:53 ANR0423W Session 45147 for administrator §A¥Q `¥Q ( ) refused - administrator name not registered. (SESSION: 45147) 10/20/04 08:09:53 ANR0423W Session 46728 for administrator §A¥Q `¥Q ( ) refused - administrator name not registered. (SESSION: 46728) 10/20/04 10:32:41 ANR0423W Session 85 for administrator §A¥Q `¥Q ( ) refused - administrator name not registered. (SESSION: 8 5) 10/20/04 10:52:41 ANR0423W Session 126 for administrator §A¥Q `¥Q ( ) refused - administrator name not registered. (SESSION: Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Gui Admin for 2nd Instance of TSM
Thanks for all who replied, (we had missed the 'halting of the server') It ended up being that we never halted the 2nd server instance after running the dsmserv runfile. It's now working. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 Curtis Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/17/2004 09:31 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Gui Admin for 2nd Instance of TSM One gotcha I've experienced with this. Make sure you are running it from the right directory. Here's what I run to get my web client working on systems with multiple instances of TSM. The TSM2 directory is my working directory for the 2nd instance on this server. #!/bin/ksh # # Set the language # export LANG=en_US # # Max out size of data area # ulimit -d unlimited # # Allow the server to pack shared memory segments # export EXTSHM=ON export DSMSERV_CONFIG=/usr/tivoli/tsm2/dsmserv.opt export DSMSERV_DIR=/usr/tivoli/tsm/server/bin export DSMSERV_LOG=/usr/tivoli/tsm2/dsmserv.log # print $(date '+%D %T') Updating TSM Administrarive Web GUI cd /usr/tivoli/tsm2 dsmserv runfile /usr/tivoli/tsm/server/webimages/dsmserv.idl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nancy L Backhaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/17/2004 08:13 AM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject Re: Gui Admin for 2nd Instance of TSM yes, we ran runfile dsmserv.idl. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 Jim Sporer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/16/2004 03:06 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Gui Admin for 2nd Instance of TSM Did you run dsmserv runfile dsmserv.idl on the second instance of the tsm server? Jim Sporer At 02:46 PM 9/16/2004 -0400, you wrote: Hello, We are setting up a 2nd instance of TSM on the same server. The http is set in the config file to 1581. We can sign into the web gui on the 2nd instance, can use the command line. But, the left hand-side, Server Administration drop down menu is coming up with 'Page cannot be found error'. Any idea's? Background Info: Operating System- AIX, Version 5.1 TSM Server Version 5.2.3 Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Re: Gui Admin for 2nd Instance of TSM
yes, we ran runfile dsmserv.idl. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 Jim Sporer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/16/2004 03:06 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Gui Admin for 2nd Instance of TSM Did you run dsmserv runfile dsmserv.idl on the second instance of the tsm server? Jim Sporer At 02:46 PM 9/16/2004 -0400, you wrote: Hello, We are setting up a 2nd instance of TSM on the same server. The http is set in the config file to 1581. We can sign into the web gui on the 2nd instance, can use the command line. But, the left hand-side, Server Administration drop down menu is coming up with 'Page cannot be found error'. Any idea's? Background Info: Operating System- AIX, Version 5.1 TSM Server Version 5.2.3 Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Gui Admin for 2nd Instance of TSM
Hello, We are setting up a 2nd instance of TSM on the same server. The http is set in the config file to 1581. We can sign into the web gui on the 2nd instance, can use the command line. But, the left hand-side, Server Administration drop down menu is coming up with 'Page cannot be found error'. Any idea's? Background Info: Operating System- AIX, Version 5.1 TSM Server Version 5.2.3 Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (716) 887-7979 Cell: (716) 609-2138 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
AIX Command Question
Hello TSMers, What is the command to disable all client schedules from contacting AIX server? I can't seem to find it...arrggghh. Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (716) 887-7979 Pager: (716) 470-0141 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
TSM 5.2 and AIX 5.1 -Any known issues?
Hello Everybody, Looking for feedback on stability issues with the following scenerio? Anyone know of any issues with running TSM 5.2 and AIX 5.1? Current Setup: Tivoli Version 5.1.6.5 Aix 5.1 P660 Library =IBM 3584-LTO 1 We are planning to upgrade Tivoli to 5.2.3 while AIX is still at 5.1 1. UpgradeTivoli from 5.1.6.55.1.7.05.1.7.35.25.2.3 (5.1.7.3 upgrade for IBM flash10258 to ensure right fixes before running the Cleanup Backup Groups utility) 2. Tivoli to 5.2.3 while AIX is still at 5.1 3. Then upgrade AIX to 5.2, Replacing P660 with P650 4. Then install new library Scaler I2000, LTO1 and LTO2, Partition ADIC lib 2 instances of TSM server. (Current and Content Manger) 2 LPAR, 1ST LPAR Prod TSM (Current and Content Manger) , 2ND Test TSM Keep current IP for prod TSM, should we have another or CM Nancy Backhaus Enterprise Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (716) 887-7979 Pager: (716) 470-0141 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Common Store and Tivoli
Hello, We are looking to integrate Common Store into our environment utilizing Tivoli as our backend archive restore/retrieval process. What I would like to know from any of you is, what other environments are doing? In order to meet different sla's set for our environment, Is anyone setting up a separate instance of TSM for content manager? How do you parse out the Tape Library drives, slots? Background Info. Our 3584 Tape library due up on lease shortly, we are looking to expand more tape drives, upgrading library to bring it up to a minimum of a 12 tape drive to increase our performance and capacity overall and to assist for email archiving. 3584 TSM Server -Version 5.1.6.5, on AIX RS/6000 103 window clients Lotus Notes TDP 5.1.5.0 Lotus Notes Release 5.0.11 Thank You, Nancy L Backhaus Phone: (716) 887-7979 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pager: (716) 470-0141 Page: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering this message to an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
