Re: [AFMUG] Text messaging services

[Steve Jones]

I think square has it

On Jul 5, 2017 10:41 AM, "Adair Winter"  wrote:

> I'm looking for a service that will allow me to load in lists of numbers
> to send text messages to. I'd like to be able to manage the lists from a
> web gui or possible integrate with some CRM. I'd like for the users to be
> able to unsubscribe from the texts by sending STOP or whatever.
>
> Does anyone have any experience with such a beast?
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> 
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Access Control for gated community

[Steve Jones]

Probably old firmware on the nanostations, security guys never update, and
never know what not checking the wds box on the wireless tab can freak out

On Jul 5, 2017 6:59 PM, "Jaime Solorza"  wrote:

So I went over to check it out...the panel is AE1000...connect via RS-232
cable to USR RS 232 to Ethernet converter.. That is connected to
Nanostation.   At office Nanostation connects to router.  I connected my
laptop and scanned network...found USR device and checked out settings.
copied those down.  went to PC with Access Base 2000 program and ran the
USR VCom programno linkran the software and it found device, it
mapped Com port 2.   The system is set at 115,000 kbps.   left all those
settings alone until I read manual I just read rs232 is only 38.4 so
that is one change I will make tomorrow after they get me all the passwords.
A couple of Maxstream RS-232 wireless radios would have been my choiceI
ran several billboards at TISD with themI will try to make it work with
what they havemore tomorrow...thanks for tips

Jaime Solorza

On Jul 5, 2017 5:20 PM, "Josh Reynolds"  wrote:

> Actually now I think about it, I want to say it was a DoorKing gate and
> motor, linear board, and HID access control system. I had it running to a
> VM over a pair of 5GHz locos on 5MHz channel.
>
> Anywho, Linear had good documentation from what I remember. This was back
> in... I think 2010 though.
>
> - Josh
>
> On Jul 5, 2017 6:14 PM, "Josh Reynolds"  wrote:
>
> DoorKing is nice to work with. Dunno what they have. I've done a few.
>
> - Josh
>
> On Jul 5, 2017 12:51 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
> wrote:
>
>> Ha...I got a call from a property manager asking for help with gate
>> access control.  Some camera company recommended me telling them I can
>> figure most things out.  I appreciate the compliment but I have never
>> worked on access control system like this.   Taking my meters and tools and
>> rosary.   Any heads up from the Borg? Tips?
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

[Steve Jones]

Make sure it's not broadcast ospf, I believe that's the default. If one
side flaps it goes away til the other side either reboots or ospf
disables/enables

On Jul 5, 2017 11:25 PM, "George Skorup"  wrote:

> No, not the L2 MTU. The L3 (IP) MTUs must match on the router interfaces
> speaking OSPF.
>
> I have zero experience with SIAE gear, but being a licensed radio, I
> imagine it has an integrated ethernet switch. I've seen a fair number of
> switches go stupid. If you can run 1500 byte pings across the link with no
> loss, then I'd assume both L2 and L3 should work as expected. However, that
> doesn't mean something isn't screwing with multicast, which OSPF obviously
> needs.
>
> On 7/5/2017 10:15 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>
> I checked, all MTUs on these links are the same.  The L2 MTU, however, is
> not.  Does this have any effect?
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Jason McKemie <
> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
>
>> No errors or packet loss.  Strangely, it seems to be preferring the
>> Rocket M5 backhaul over the SIAE 11GHz link.  The MTU on both ends of the
>> link has remained at default on these.  I'll double check, but unless it
>> changed itself it should be the same.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:13 PM, George Skorup 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Errors or packet loss? Something rate limiting multicast? Has someone
>>> recently changed MTUs? I don't know if RouterOS will even log OSPF MTU
>>> mismatches. Never tried it. If the IP/L3 MTUs don't match, then OSPF is not
>>> gonna have a good time. OSPF relies on IP since there is no native
>>> fragmentation in the protocol.
>>>
>>> As far as NTP and/or accurate time, I haven't experienced any issues
>>> with that in regards to OSPF. I discovered a router where the NTP process
>>> appeared to have crashed and the clock was off by like 10 minutes. OSPF was
>>> humming along with two neighbors for months and a third for hours because
>>> the adjacent router was rebooted.
>>>
>>> On 7/5/2017 7:20 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
>>>
>>> I also recommend only using bug fix release for mikrotik. Also make sure
>>> you have clocks synced to an ntp source on every mikrotik router and that
>>> it's accurate.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:09 PM Jason McKemie <
>>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
>>>
 Thanks.  I'll try 6.38.7 tonight.

 There haven't been many changes to the network, and every is pingable.
 I did add one static route for a Baicells eNB a week or two ago, but the
 problem cropped up more recently.  I'll have to look into that a bit more.

 On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Chris Wright 
 wrote:

> I recommend sticking to the Bugfix releases (currently 6.38.7).
>
>
>
> Did anything happen recently that could possibly have provoked the
> disappearance like a VLAN or other L2/L3 change? Are the neighbors 
> pingable
> on their backbone IPs?
>
>
>
> Chris Wright
>
> Network Administrator
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 05, 2017 4:53 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF
>
>
>
> Has anyone seen issues with Mikrotik OSPF neighbors just disappearing
> for no apparent reason? All of my links are ok, but I OSPF just isn't
> picking anything up on one of them. I might try upgrading both of the
> Mikrotiks involved, this feels like a bug. I have 6.38.5 on one end and
> 6.38 on the other, both CCR's.
>

 --
>>> Darin Steffl
>>> Minnesota WiFi
>>> www.mnwifi.com
>>> 507-634-WiFi
>>>  Like us on Facebook
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

[George Skorup]

No, not the L2 MTU. The L3 (IP) MTUs must match on the router interfaces 
speaking OSPF.


I have zero experience with SIAE gear, but being a licensed radio, I 
imagine it has an integrated ethernet switch. I've seen a fair number of 
switches go stupid. If you can run 1500 byte pings across the link with 
no loss, then I'd assume both L2 and L3 should work as expected. 
However, that doesn't mean something isn't screwing with multicast, 
which OSPF obviously needs.


On 7/5/2017 10:15 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
I checked, all MTUs on these links are the same. The L2 MTU, however, 
is not.  Does this have any effect?


On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Jason McKemie 
> wrote:


No errors or packet loss.  Strangely, it seems to be preferring
the Rocket M5 backhaul over the SIAE 11GHz link.  The MTU on both
ends of the link has remained at default on these.  I'll double
check, but unless it changed itself it should be the same.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:13 PM, George Skorup
> wrote:

Errors or packet loss? Something rate limiting multicast? Has
someone recently changed MTUs? I don't know if RouterOS will
even log OSPF MTU mismatches. Never tried it. If the IP/L3
MTUs don't match, then OSPF is not gonna have a good time.
OSPF relies on IP since there is no native fragmentation in
the protocol.

As far as NTP and/or accurate time, I haven't experienced any
issues with that in regards to OSPF. I discovered a router
where the NTP process appeared to have crashed and the clock
was off by like 10 minutes. OSPF was humming along with two
neighbors for months and a third for hours because the
adjacent router was rebooted.

On 7/5/2017 7:20 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:

I also recommend only using bug fix release for mikrotik.
Also make sure you have clocks synced to an ntp source on
every mikrotik router and that it's accurate.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:09 PM Jason McKemie
> wrote:

Thanks.  I'll try 6.38.7 tonight.

There haven't been many changes to the network, and every
is pingable.  I did add one static route for a Baicells
eNB a week or two ago, but the problem cropped up more
recently.  I'll have to look into that a bit more.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Chris Wright
> wrote:

I recommend sticking to the Bugfix releases
(currently 6.38.7).

Did anything happen recently that could possibly have
provoked the disappearance like a VLAN or other L2/L3
change? Are the neighbors pingable on their backbone IPs?

Chris Wright

Network Administrator

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
] *On Behalf Of *Jason
McKemie
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 05, 2017 4:53 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com 
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

Has anyone seen issues with Mikrotik OSPF neighbors
just disappearing for no apparent reason? All of my
links are ok, but I OSPF just isn't picking anything
up on one of them. I might try upgrading both of the
Mikrotiks involved, this feels like a bug. I have
6.38.5 on one end and 6.38 on the other, both CCR's.


-- 
Darin Steffl

Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com 
507-634-WiFi
 Like us on Facebook

Re: [AFMUG] simple IP POE camera

[Jeremy]

Unifi Gen3 are nice.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Eric Kuhnke  wrote:

> 24V will really limit your choices, most all good quality IP cameras these
> days are 48V 802.3af (or 802.3at for super high powered ones such as Axis
> pan/tilt/zoom with heater).
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Robert  wrote:
>
>> Looking for a simple 24V POE camera that does not require an NVR or
>> special software, just want to log in over IP connection and view...
>>  Recommendations?
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

[Jason McKemie]

I checked, all MTUs on these links are the same.  The L2 MTU, however, is
not.  Does this have any effect?

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:

> No errors or packet loss.  Strangely, it seems to be preferring the Rocket
> M5 backhaul over the SIAE 11GHz link.  The MTU on both ends of the link has
> remained at default on these.  I'll double check, but unless it changed
> itself it should be the same.
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:13 PM, George Skorup 
> wrote:
>
>> Errors or packet loss? Something rate limiting multicast? Has someone
>> recently changed MTUs? I don't know if RouterOS will even log OSPF MTU
>> mismatches. Never tried it. If the IP/L3 MTUs don't match, then OSPF is not
>> gonna have a good time. OSPF relies on IP since there is no native
>> fragmentation in the protocol.
>>
>> As far as NTP and/or accurate time, I haven't experienced any issues with
>> that in regards to OSPF. I discovered a router where the NTP process
>> appeared to have crashed and the clock was off by like 10 minutes. OSPF was
>> humming along with two neighbors for months and a third for hours because
>> the adjacent router was rebooted.
>>
>> On 7/5/2017 7:20 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
>>
>> I also recommend only using bug fix release for mikrotik. Also make sure
>> you have clocks synced to an ntp source on every mikrotik router and that
>> it's accurate.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:09 PM Jason McKemie <
>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks.  I'll try 6.38.7 tonight.
>>>
>>> There haven't been many changes to the network, and every is pingable.
>>> I did add one static route for a Baicells eNB a week or two ago, but the
>>> problem cropped up more recently.  I'll have to look into that a bit more.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Chris Wright 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 I recommend sticking to the Bugfix releases (currently 6.38.7).



 Did anything happen recently that could possibly have provoked the
 disappearance like a VLAN or other L2/L3 change? Are the neighbors pingable
 on their backbone IPs?



 Chris Wright

 Network Administrator



 *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
 *Sent:* Wednesday, July 05, 2017 4:53 PM
 *To:* af@afmug.com
 *Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF



 Has anyone seen issues with Mikrotik OSPF neighbors just disappearing
 for no apparent reason? All of my links are ok, but I OSPF just isn't
 picking anything up on one of them. I might try upgrading both of the
 Mikrotiks involved, this feels like a bug. I have 6.38.5 on one end and
 6.38 on the other, both CCR's.

>>>
>>> --
>> Darin Steffl
>> Minnesota WiFi
>> www.mnwifi.com
>> 507-634-WiFi
>>  Like us on Facebook
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

[Jason McKemie]

No errors or packet loss.  Strangely, it seems to be preferring the Rocket
M5 backhaul over the SIAE 11GHz link.  The MTU on both ends of the link has
remained at default on these.  I'll double check, but unless it changed
itself it should be the same.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:13 PM, George Skorup 
wrote:

> Errors or packet loss? Something rate limiting multicast? Has someone
> recently changed MTUs? I don't know if RouterOS will even log OSPF MTU
> mismatches. Never tried it. If the IP/L3 MTUs don't match, then OSPF is not
> gonna have a good time. OSPF relies on IP since there is no native
> fragmentation in the protocol.
>
> As far as NTP and/or accurate time, I haven't experienced any issues with
> that in regards to OSPF. I discovered a router where the NTP process
> appeared to have crashed and the clock was off by like 10 minutes. OSPF was
> humming along with two neighbors for months and a third for hours because
> the adjacent router was rebooted.
>
> On 7/5/2017 7:20 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
>
> I also recommend only using bug fix release for mikrotik. Also make sure
> you have clocks synced to an ntp source on every mikrotik router and that
> it's accurate.
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:09 PM Jason McKemie <
> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks.  I'll try 6.38.7 tonight.
>>
>> There haven't been many changes to the network, and every is pingable.  I
>> did add one static route for a Baicells eNB a week or two ago, but the
>> problem cropped up more recently.  I'll have to look into that a bit more.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Chris Wright  wrote:
>>
>>> I recommend sticking to the Bugfix releases (currently 6.38.7).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Did anything happen recently that could possibly have provoked the
>>> disappearance like a VLAN or other L2/L3 change? Are the neighbors pingable
>>> on their backbone IPs?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Chris Wright
>>>
>>> Network Administrator
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 05, 2017 4:53 PM
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Has anyone seen issues with Mikrotik OSPF neighbors just disappearing
>>> for no apparent reason? All of my links are ok, but I OSPF just isn't
>>> picking anything up on one of them. I might try upgrading both of the
>>> Mikrotiks involved, this feels like a bug. I have 6.38.5 on one end and
>>> 6.38 on the other, both CCR's.
>>>
>>
>> --
> Darin Steffl
> Minnesota WiFi
> www.mnwifi.com
> 507-634-WiFi
>  Like us on Facebook
> 
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

[Adam Moffett]

+1


-- Original Message --
From: "George Skorup" 
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 7/5/2017 9:13:41 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

Errors or packet loss? Something rate limiting multicast? Has someone 
recently changed MTUs? I don't know if RouterOS will even log OSPF MTU 
mismatches. Never tried it. If the IP/L3 MTUs don't match, then OSPF is 
not gonna have a good time. OSPF relies on IP since there is no native 
fragmentation in the protocol.


As far as NTP and/or accurate time, I haven't experienced any issues 
with that in regards to OSPF. I discovered a router where the NTP 
process appeared to have crashed and the clock was off by like 10 
minutes. OSPF was humming along with two neighbors for months and a 
third for hours because the adjacent router was rebooted.


On 7/5/2017 7:20 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
I also recommend only using bug fix release for mikrotik. Also make 
sure you have clocks synced to an ntp source on every mikrotik router 
and that it's accurate.


On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:09 PM Jason McKemie 
 wrote:

Thanks.  I'll try 6.38.7 tonight.

There haven't been many changes to the network, and every is 
pingable.  I did add one static route for a Baicells eNB a week or 
two ago, but the problem cropped up more recently.  I'll have to look 
into that a bit more.


On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Chris Wright  
wrote:

I recommend sticking to the Bugfix releases (currently 6.38.7).



Did anything happen recently that could possibly have provoked the 
disappearance like a VLAN or other L2/L3 change? Are the neighbors 
pingable on their backbone IPs?




Chris Wright

Network Administrator



From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 4:53 PM
To:af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF



Has anyone seen issues with Mikrotik OSPF neighbors just 
disappearing for no apparent reason? All of my links are ok, but I 
OSPF just isn't picking anything up on one of them. I might try 
upgrading both of the Mikrotiks involved, this feels like a bug. I 
have 6.38.5 on one end and 6.38 on the other, both CCR's.





--
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com
507-634-WiFi
 Like us on Facebook 

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik 6.37.1 ethernet counters - Broken?

[Josh Luthman]

493 sounds like a bit too early to get those stats to me, too.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:42 PM, George Skorup 
wrote:

> 493 what? The 493 and 493AH switch controller is dumb and will not give
> you any port error stats. The 493G switch controllers will. And pretty much
> any other board with gigabit interfaces will as well.
>
> On 7/5/2017 2:29 PM, Wireless Administrator wrote:
>
> I see.  We’re running RB493 on this install.
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 05, 2017 2:38 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik 6.37.1 ethernet counters - Broken?
>
>
>
> I think it matters what hardware you have, not software version.
>
>
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Wireless Administrator 
> wrote:
>
> Can anyone confirm that Mikrotik Ethernet error counters work in 6.37.1
> and newer software?  I’m trying to identify a problem and was surprised to
> see all zeros on these counters.  These are columns that need to be added
> “Right Mouse, show columns” for them to display.  I can’t say that they
> ever worked since I have never tried to use them in the past.
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

[George Skorup]

Errors or packet loss? Something rate limiting multicast? Has someone 
recently changed MTUs? I don't know if RouterOS will even log OSPF MTU 
mismatches. Never tried it. If the IP/L3 MTUs don't match, then OSPF is 
not gonna have a good time. OSPF relies on IP since there is no native 
fragmentation in the protocol.


As far as NTP and/or accurate time, I haven't experienced any issues 
with that in regards to OSPF. I discovered a router where the NTP 
process appeared to have crashed and the clock was off by like 10 
minutes. OSPF was humming along with two neighbors for months and a 
third for hours because the adjacent router was rebooted.


On 7/5/2017 7:20 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
I also recommend only using bug fix release for mikrotik. Also make 
sure you have clocks synced to an ntp source on every mikrotik router 
and that it's accurate.


On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:09 PM Jason McKemie 
> wrote:


Thanks.  I'll try 6.38.7 tonight.

There haven't been many changes to the network, and every is
pingable.  I did add one static route for a Baicells eNB a week or
two ago, but the problem cropped up more recently.  I'll have to
look into that a bit more.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Chris Wright > wrote:

I recommend sticking to the Bugfix releases (currently 6.38.7).

Did anything happen recently that could possibly have provoked
the disappearance like a VLAN or other L2/L3 change? Are the
neighbors pingable on their backbone IPs?

Chris Wright

Network Administrator

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 05, 2017 4:53 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com 
*Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

Has anyone seen issues with Mikrotik OSPF neighbors just
disappearing for no apparent reason? All of my links are ok,
but I OSPF just isn't picking anything up on one of them. I
might try upgrading both of the Mikrotiks involved, this feels
like a bug. I have 6.38.5 on one end and 6.38 on the other,
both CCR's.


--
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com 
507-634-WiFi
 Like us on Facebook 

Re: [AFMUG] simple IP POE camera

[Eric Kuhnke]

24V will really limit your choices, most all good quality IP cameras these
days are 48V 802.3af (or 802.3at for super high powered ones such as Axis
pan/tilt/zoom with heater).



On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Robert  wrote:

> Looking for a simple 24V POE camera that does not require an NVR or
> special software, just want to log in over IP connection and view...
>  Recommendations?
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] simple IP POE camera

[Jaime Solorza]

I just installed 2 Hikvision IP cameras with SD card slot...I used 32g
version 10 ones and installed iVMS 4500 in a PC to store video
files...cameras 95.00 each and 13.00 for SD cards...Dome style with IR

Jaime Solorza

On Jul 5, 2017 6:37 PM, "Robert"  wrote:

> Looking for a simple 24V POE camera that does not require an NVR or
> special software, just want to log in over IP connection and view...
>  Recommendations?
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

[Bill Prince]

If you are overloading IP space without VLANs, mikrotik can get confused 
about who's on first so to speak.


bp


On 7/5/2017 4:53 PM, Jason McKemie wrote:
Has anyone seen issues with Mikrotik OSPF neighbors just disappearing 
for no apparent reason? All of my links are ok, but I OSPF just isn't 
picking anything up on one of them. I might try upgrading both of the 
Mikrotiks involved, this feels like a bug. I have 6.38.5 on one end 
and 6.38 on the other, both CCR's. 

[AFMUG] simple IP POE camera

[Robert]

Looking for a simple 24V POE camera that does not require an NVR or 
special software, just want to log in over IP connection and view... 
Recommendations?

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

[Jeff Evans]

And use the same ntp source on all routers



Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
 Original message From: Darin Steffl  
Date: 7/5/17  8:20 PM  (GMT-05:00) To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 
Mikrotik OSPF 
I also recommend only using bug fix release for mikrotik. Also make sure you 
have clocks synced to an ntp source on every mikrotik router and that it's 
accurate.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:09 PM Jason McKemie  
wrote:
Thanks.  I'll try 6.38.7 tonight.
There haven't been many changes to the network, and every is pingable.  I did 
add one static route for a Baicells eNB a week or two ago, but the problem 
cropped up more recently.  I'll have to look into that a bit more.
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Chris Wright  wrote:
I recommend sticking to the Bugfix releases (currently 6.38.7). Did anything 
happen recently that could possibly have provoked the disappearance like a VLAN 
or other L2/L3 change? Are the neighbors pingable on their backbone IPs? Chris 
WrightNetwork Administrator From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of 
Jason McKemie
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 4:53 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF Has anyone seen issues with Mikrotik OSPF 
neighbors just disappearing for no apparent reason? All of my links are ok, but 
I OSPF just isn't picking anything up on one of them. I might try upgrading 
both of the Mikrotiks involved, this feels like a bug. I have 6.38.5 on one end 
and 6.38 on the other, both CCR's. 

-- 
Darin StefflMinnesota WiFiwww.mnwifi.com507-634-WiFi Like us on Facebook

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

[Darin Steffl]

I also recommend only using bug fix release for mikrotik. Also make sure
you have clocks synced to an ntp source on every mikrotik router and that
it's accurate.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:09 PM Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:

> Thanks.  I'll try 6.38.7 tonight.
>
> There haven't been many changes to the network, and every is pingable.  I
> did add one static route for a Baicells eNB a week or two ago, but the
> problem cropped up more recently.  I'll have to look into that a bit more.
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Chris Wright  wrote:
>
>> I recommend sticking to the Bugfix releases (currently 6.38.7).
>>
>>
>>
>> Did anything happen recently that could possibly have provoked the
>> disappearance like a VLAN or other L2/L3 change? Are the neighbors pingable
>> on their backbone IPs?
>>
>>
>>
>> Chris Wright
>>
>> Network Administrator
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 05, 2017 4:53 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF
>>
>>
>>
>> Has anyone seen issues with Mikrotik OSPF neighbors just disappearing for
>> no apparent reason? All of my links are ok, but I OSPF just isn't picking
>> anything up on one of them. I might try upgrading both of the Mikrotiks
>> involved, this feels like a bug. I have 6.38.5 on one end and 6.38 on the
>> other, both CCR's.
>>
>
> --
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com
507-634-WiFi
 Like us on Facebook

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

[Jason McKemie]

Thanks.  I'll try 6.38.7 tonight.

There haven't been many changes to the network, and every is pingable.  I
did add one static route for a Baicells eNB a week or two ago, but the
problem cropped up more recently.  I'll have to look into that a bit more.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Chris Wright  wrote:

> I recommend sticking to the Bugfix releases (currently 6.38.7).
>
>
>
> Did anything happen recently that could possibly have provoked the
> disappearance like a VLAN or other L2/L3 change? Are the neighbors pingable
> on their backbone IPs?
>
>
>
> Chris Wright
>
> Network Administrator
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 05, 2017 4:53 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF
>
>
>
> Has anyone seen issues with Mikrotik OSPF neighbors just disappearing for
> no apparent reason? All of my links are ok, but I OSPF just isn't picking
> anything up on one of them. I might try upgrading both of the Mikrotiks
> involved, this feels like a bug. I have 6.38.5 on one end and 6.38 on the
> other, both CCR's.
>

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

[Chris Wright]

I recommend sticking to the Bugfix releases (currently 6.38.7).

 

Did anything happen recently that could possibly have provoked the 
disappearance like a VLAN or other L2/L3 change? Are the neighbors pingable on 
their backbone IPs?

 

Chris Wright

Network Administrator

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 4:53 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

 

Has anyone seen issues with Mikrotik OSPF neighbors just disappearing for no 
apparent reason? All of my links are ok, but I OSPF just isn't picking anything 
up on one of them. I might try upgrading both of the Mikrotiks involved, this 
feels like a bug. I have 6.38.5 on one end and 6.38 on the other, both CCR's. 

Re: [AFMUG] Access Control for gated community

[Jaime Solorza]

So I went over to check it out...the panel is AE1000...connect via RS-232
cable to USR RS 232 to Ethernet converter.. That is connected to
Nanostation.   At office Nanostation connects to router.  I connected my
laptop and scanned network...found USR device and checked out settings.
copied those down.  went to PC with Access Base 2000 program and ran the
USR VCom programno linkran the software and it found device, it
mapped Com port 2.   The system is set at 115,000 kbps.   left all those
settings alone until I read manual I just read rs232 is only 38.4 so
that is one change I will make tomorrow after they get me all the passwords.
A couple of Maxstream RS-232 wireless radios would have been my choiceI
ran several billboards at TISD with themI will try to make it work with
what they havemore tomorrow...thanks for tips

Jaime Solorza

On Jul 5, 2017 5:20 PM, "Josh Reynolds"  wrote:

> Actually now I think about it, I want to say it was a DoorKing gate and
> motor, linear board, and HID access control system. I had it running to a
> VM over a pair of 5GHz locos on 5MHz channel.
>
> Anywho, Linear had good documentation from what I remember. This was back
> in... I think 2010 though.
>
> - Josh
>
> On Jul 5, 2017 6:14 PM, "Josh Reynolds"  wrote:
>
> DoorKing is nice to work with. Dunno what they have. I've done a few.
>
> - Josh
>
> On Jul 5, 2017 12:51 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
> wrote:
>
>> Ha...I got a call from a property manager asking for help with gate
>> access control.  Some camera company recommended me telling them I can
>> figure most things out.  I appreciate the compliment but I have never
>> worked on access control system like this.   Taking my meters and tools and
>> rosary.   Any heads up from the Borg? Tips?
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>
>

[AFMUG] Mikrotik OSPF

[Jason McKemie]

Has anyone seen issues with Mikrotik OSPF neighbors just disappearing for
no apparent reason? All of my links are ok, but I OSPF just isn't picking
anything up on one of them. I might try upgrading both of the Mikrotiks
involved, this feels like a bug. I have 6.38.5 on one end and 6.38 on the
other, both CCR's.

Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

[Bill Prince]

I know some people in the satellite business. ;-)


bp


On 7/5/2017 4:32 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists wrote:

Heard a rumor or started one?  ;-)

Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com 

On Jul 5, 2017, at 7:29 PM, Bill Prince > wrote:


Heard a rumor that Apple was wanting to get into the LEO broadband 
satellite business too.


You heard it here first.


bp


On 7/5/2017 12:09 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:


900 f’n satellites? Jeez, isn’t there some sort of international 
consortium that says that’s more than enough?


That’s going to be over 1Tbps capacity network wide?

That should definitely help the digital divide for remote areas.

*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:01 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

None of these guys know what’s about to hit them with Viasat 2 and 
Viasat 3.  Other than the latency for gaming and voice, Viasat 2 can 
hit up to 1Gbps and it goes live in January.  Viasat 3 will by up by 
2019 or 2020 and several times faster than Viasat 2.


Rory

*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:47 AM
*To:* Animal Farm >
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

Sure...fill up the sky with more stuff, how the hell are my buddies 
supposed to navigate through safely?  Lots of people still need to 
be probed


Jaime Solorza

On Jul 5, 2017 10:21 AM, "Lewis Bergman" > wrote:


*OneWeb Satellites Preps for Global Broadband Service*


OneWeb Satellites cranked up its assembly line last week in
Toulouse, France to begin end-to-end validation, testing, and
integration of its first satellites set for launch in just over
nine months. The move comes after the FCC granted the company
authority to access the U.S. market using its proposed
non-geostationary Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellation.
OneWeb says its satellites will enable carriers and ISPs to
offer affordable broadband access in rural areas.

OneWeb Satellites


 is
a joint venture between OneWeb communications and Airbus Defense
and Space. The Toulouse factory will validate production methods
for a larger factory near the Kennedy Space Center, FL. The
company plans to initially launch 10 satellites, and grow the
constellation to 900 satellites to offer high-speed internet
with global coverage and bridge the digital divide by 2027.

Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

[Jeff Broadwick - Lists]

Heard a rumor or started one?  ;-)

Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com

> On Jul 5, 2017, at 7:29 PM, Bill Prince  wrote:
> 
> Heard a rumor that Apple was wanting to get into the LEO broadband satellite 
> business too.
> 
> You heard it here first.
> 
> 
> bp
> 
> 
>> On 7/5/2017 12:09 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:
>> 900 f’n satellites? Jeez, isn’t there some sort of international consortium 
>> that says that’s more than enough?
>>  
>> That’s going to be over 1Tbps capacity network wide?
>>  
>> That should definitely help the digital divide for remote areas.
>>  
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:01 PM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?
>>  
>> None of these guys know what’s about to hit them with Viasat 2 and Viasat 3. 
>>  Other than the latency for gaming and voice, Viasat 2 can hit up to 1Gbps 
>> and it goes live in January.  Viasat 3 will by up by 2019 or 2020 and 
>> several times faster than Viasat 2.
>> 
>> Rory
>>  
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:47 AM
>> To: Animal Farm 
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?
>>  
>> Sure...fill up the sky with more stuff, how the hell are my buddies supposed 
>> to navigate through safely?  Lots of people still need to be probed
>> 
>> Jaime Solorza
>>  
>> On Jul 5, 2017 10:21 AM, "Lewis Bergman"  wrote:
>> OneWeb Satellites Preps for Global Broadband Service
>> 
>> OneWeb Satellites cranked up its assembly line last week in Toulouse, France 
>> to begin end-to-end validation, testing, and integration of its first 
>> satellites set for launch in just over nine months. The move comes after the 
>> FCC granted the company authority to access the U.S. market using its 
>> proposed non-geostationary Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellation. 
>> OneWeb says its satellites will enable carriers and ISPs to offer affordable 
>> broadband access in rural areas.
>> 
>> OneWeb Satellites is a joint venture between OneWeb communications and 
>> Airbus Defense and Space. The Toulouse factory will validate production 
>> methods for a larger factory near the Kennedy Space Center, FL. The company 
>> plans to initially launch 10 satellites, and grow the constellation to 900 
>> satellites to offer high-speed internet with global coverage and bridge the 
>> digital divide by 2027.
>>  
> 

Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

[Bill Prince]

Heard a rumor that Apple was wanting to get into the LEO broadband 
satellite business too.


You heard it here first.


bp


On 7/5/2017 12:09 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:


900 f’n satellites? Jeez, isn’t there some sort of international 
consortium that says that’s more than enough?


That’s going to be over 1Tbps capacity network wide?

That should definitely help the digital divide for remote areas.

*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:01 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

None of these guys know what’s about to hit them with Viasat 2 and 
Viasat 3.  Other than the latency for gaming and voice, Viasat 2 can 
hit up to 1Gbps and it goes live in January.  Viasat 3 will by up by 
2019 or 2020 and several times faster than Viasat 2.


Rory

*From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:47 AM
*To:* Animal Farm >
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

Sure...fill up the sky with more stuff, how the hell are my buddies 
supposed to navigate through safely?  Lots of people still need to be 
probed


Jaime Solorza

On Jul 5, 2017 10:21 AM, "Lewis Bergman" > wrote:


*OneWeb Satellites Preps for Global Broadband Service*


OneWeb Satellites cranked up its assembly line last week in
Toulouse, France to begin end-to-end validation, testing, and
integration of its first satellites set for launch in just over
nine months. The move comes after the FCC granted the company
authority to access the U.S. market using its proposed
non-geostationary Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellation.
OneWeb says its satellites will enable carriers and ISPs to offer
affordable broadband access in rural areas.

OneWeb Satellites


 is
a joint venture between OneWeb communications and Airbus Defense
and Space. The Toulouse factory will validate production methods
for a larger factory near the Kennedy Space Center, FL. The
company plans to initially launch 10 satellites, and grow the
constellation to 900 satellites to offer high-speed internet with
global coverage and bridge the digital divide by 2027.

Re: [AFMUG] Access Control for gated community

[Josh Reynolds]

Actually now I think about it, I want to say it was a DoorKing gate and
motor, linear board, and HID access control system. I had it running to a
VM over a pair of 5GHz locos on 5MHz channel.

Anywho, Linear had good documentation from what I remember. This was back
in... I think 2010 though.

- Josh

On Jul 5, 2017 6:14 PM, "Josh Reynolds"  wrote:

DoorKing is nice to work with. Dunno what they have. I've done a few.

- Josh

On Jul 5, 2017 12:51 PM, "Jaime Solorza"  wrote:

> Ha...I got a call from a property manager asking for help with gate access
> control.  Some camera company recommended me telling them I can figure most
> things out.  I appreciate the compliment but I have never worked on access
> control system like this.   Taking my meters and tools and rosary.   Any
> heads up from the Borg? Tips?
>
> Jaime Solorza
>

Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

[Darin Steffl]

Viasat 2 will have about 300 gbps of capacity. Viasat 3 will have 1 tbps
per satellite with a total of 3 being launched between 2019 and 2020 for
worldwide coverage.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:31 PM Chuck Hogg  wrote:

> https://phys.org/news/2017-05-spacex-thousands-internet-satellites.html
>
>
> Regards,
> Chuck
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Mike Hammett  wrote:
>
>> Some companies (more than one) are planning on launching 4,000 satellites
>> each.
>>
>>
>>
>> -
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Midwest Internet Exchange 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The Brothers WISP 
>> 
>>
>>
>> 
>> --
>> *From: *"Sterling Jacobson" 
>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:09:57 PM
>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?
>>
>> 900 f’n satellites? Jeez, isn’t there some sort of international
>> consortium that says that’s more than enough?
>>
>>
>>
>> That’s going to be over 1Tbps capacity network wide?
>>
>>
>>
>> That should definitely help the digital divide for remote areas.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:01 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?
>>
>>
>>
>> None of these guys know what’s about to hit them with Viasat 2 and Viasat
>> 3.  Other than the latency for gaming and voice, Viasat 2 can hit up to
>> 1Gbps and it goes live in January.  Viasat 3 will by up by 2019 or 2020 and
>> several times faster than Viasat 2.
>>
>> Rory
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] *On
>> Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:47 AM
>> *To:* Animal Farm 
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?
>>
>>
>>
>> Sure...fill up the sky with more stuff, how the hell are my buddies
>> supposed to navigate through safely?  Lots of people still need to be probed
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 5, 2017 10:21 AM, "Lewis Bergman"  wrote:
>>
>> *OneWeb Satellites Preps for Global Broadband Service*
>>
>> OneWeb Satellites cranked up its assembly line last week in Toulouse,
>> France to begin end-to-end validation, testing, and integration of its
>> first satellites set for launch in just over nine months. The move comes
>> after the FCC granted the company authority to access the U.S. market using
>> its proposed non-geostationary Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite
>> constellation. OneWeb says its satellites will enable carriers and ISPs to
>> offer affordable broadband access in rural areas.
>>
>> OneWeb Satellites
>> 
>>  is
>> a joint venture between OneWeb communications and Airbus Defense and Space.
>> The Toulouse factory will validate production methods for a larger factory
>> near the Kennedy Space Center, FL. The company plans to initially launch 10
>> satellites, and grow the constellation to 900 satellites to offer
>> high-speed internet with global coverage and bridge the digital divide by
>> 2027.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
Darin Steffl
Minnesota WiFi
www.mnwifi.com
507-634-WiFi
 Like us on Facebook

Re: [AFMUG] Access Control for gated community

[Josh Reynolds]

DoorKing is nice to work with. Dunno what they have. I've done a few.

- Josh

On Jul 5, 2017 12:51 PM, "Jaime Solorza"  wrote:

> Ha...I got a call from a property manager asking for help with gate access
> control.  Some camera company recommended me telling them I can figure most
> things out.  I appreciate the compliment but I have never worked on access
> control system like this.   Taking my meters and tools and rosary.   Any
> heads up from the Borg? Tips?
>
> Jaime Solorza
>

Re: [AFMUG] Planet Switches Suck Ass?

[Lewis Bergman]

I have 2 24 port SFP's that worked the whole time we had them installed. I
think they ae in a box upstairs now.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:13 PM Sterling Jacobson 
wrote:

> Ok.
>
> I bought them from Versa, so I'll try that.
>
> I hesitate because I don't have a replacement that isn't also a Planet
> until today.
>
> I got in two more Fiberstore switches that are also Chinese interface.
> But they are also responsive, and the switch cost the same as the Planet,
> and the one we have in production seems to work a lot better.
>
> It also has dual power supplies.
>
> The Planet only has the one.
>
> Also, Vera got back to me and stated their switches were operating outside
> of temperature range.
> AND they were not supposed to be installed without air flow between them.
> In other words, don't place your planet 1U switches in a stack one on top
> of another I guess, lol!
>
> I replied and told them that's total BS and the temp is their fault,
> ambient is normal and their fan lights never went past the first fan that I
> ever saw.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:05 PM
> To: 'af@afmug.com' 
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Planet Switches Suck Ass?
>
> I cannot speak to the particular model # you referenced, but we have
> deployed a WGSW-48040HP (48-port copper gigabit PoE, used to power a VoIP
> installation for a customer site).  Hardware-wise it has been fine, but the
> software was another story.  It had (and still has) many quirks, as well as
> some severe firmware bugs when it came to LLDP that prevented the phones
> from learning the voice VLAN.
>
> As unimpressed as I was with the quality of the software, the support was
> another matter.  We were crunched for time as far as the schedule for
> installing the switch for the customer went, but rather than start by going
> through the hassle of returning the switch and sourcing a different one, I
> decided to see what would happen if I opened a ticket with them.  I had a
> hot-off-the-presses new firmware build that had been made directly in
> response to my ticket in my inbox inside of a week.  I don't think I've
> ever before experienced such a quick turnaround from a vendor in response
> to a software defect report.
>
> I am not sure yet if that will be enough to retain my business in the
> future -- for PoE applications, EdgeSwitches seem to be significantly
> cheaper per-port and the software quality is arguably higher, although they
> also aren't without their own quirks and problems -- but it certainly
> hasn't hurt their chances, I can tell you that.
>
> The disclaimers I'll add is that we bought our switch directly from their
> main U.S. distributor, Versa Technologies, and we opened our ticket up
> directly with them via their Zendesk (http://vtek.zendesk.com).  I don't
> know if you get the same treatment if you buy through different channels,
> but it's worth a shot.
>
> The one issue with half the SFP ports on one particular switch no longer
> lighting up sounds like a hardware defect.  If it's new I don't know why
> you would hesitate either to return it for a refund or for warranty
> repair/replacement.
>
> -- Nathan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 12:16 PM
> To: 'af@afmug.com'
> Subject: [AFMUG] Planet Switches Suck Ass?
>
> Anyone use the larger Planet switches?
>
> I've got five of the 48 port SFP switches (with 4 port SFP+).
>
> They are total crap.
>
> Brand new out of box, and a few hours later one switch can't seem to bring
> up lights on ports 25-48 anymore.
>
> Four of them have issues with SFP+ port disconnecting and not reconnecting
> anymore.
> They also blink out and show lights on an SFP+ port with activity THAT HAS
> NOTHING PLUGGED IN.
>
> This is specifically for the GS-5220-46S2C4X.
>
> Does anyone have any special contact with them, or a contact person/email?
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Access Control for gated community

[Lewis Bergman]

Windows 10 seems to be pretty good with serial to USB. It has been a while
since I have had one not work. Startech makes some nice multiport serial
devices if you need them.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:59 PM Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

> I am reading up on software ..they already called me to help them.
>
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Jul 5, 2017 1:48 PM, "Chuck Hogg"  wrote:
>
>> I use a USB to serial adapter for our old Plotter that uses serial...You
>> can probably get one of those...install the drivers and be done.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chuck
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Jaime Solorza 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> They bought new PC with Windows 10 and installed software with client
>>> database...old system was Windows 7 with 9 pin serial connector that worked
>>> for several years...it looks like their guy installed a serial to Ethernet
>>> converter and now can't get access to control panel.  He has been at it for
>>> three weeks.  If he can't get going they want to hire me to give it a shot.
>>> It's a Linear Access Base 2000 system.  I was recommended by new camera
>>> systems guy.  I asked questions and took pictures.  Didn't offer any
>>> consultant advice.
>>>
>>> Jaime Solorza
>>>
>>> On Jul 5, 2017 1:13 PM, "Josh Luthman" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 What are you supposed to be accomplishing?


 Josh Luthman
 Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
 Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
 1100 Wayne St
 Suite 1337
 Troy, OH 45373

 On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Jaime Solorza <
 losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Not touching anything yet...just took some pictures and asked
> questions...
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Jul 5, 2017 12:02 PM, "Lewis Bergman" 
> wrote:
>
>> We have gotten the same thing a few times. Some are computer
>> controlled, others pretty simple. I doubt you'll have any issues with it.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:51 PM Jaime Solorza <
>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ha...I got a call from a property manager asking for help with gate
>>> access control.  Some camera company recommended me telling them I can
>>> figure most things out.  I appreciate the compliment but I have never
>>> worked on access control system like this.   Taking my meters and tools 
>>> and
>>> rosary.   Any heads up from the Borg? Tips?
>>>
>>>
>>> Jaime Solorza
>>>
>>

>>

Re: [AFMUG] Planet Switches Suck Ass?

[Sterling Jacobson]

Ok.

I bought them from Versa, so I'll try that.

I hesitate because I don't have a replacement that isn't also a Planet until 
today.

I got in two more Fiberstore switches that are also Chinese interface.
But they are also responsive, and the switch cost the same as the Planet, and 
the one we have in production seems to work a lot better.

It also has dual power supplies.

The Planet only has the one.

Also, Vera got back to me and stated their switches were operating outside of 
temperature range.
AND they were not supposed to be installed without air flow between them.
In other words, don't place your planet 1U switches in a stack one on top of 
another I guess, lol!

I replied and told them that's total BS and the temp is their fault, ambient is 
normal and their fan lights never went past the first fan that I ever saw.



-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Nathan Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:05 PM
To: 'af@afmug.com' 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Planet Switches Suck Ass?

I cannot speak to the particular model # you referenced, but we have deployed a 
WGSW-48040HP (48-port copper gigabit PoE, used to power a VoIP installation for 
a customer site).  Hardware-wise it has been fine, but the software was another 
story.  It had (and still has) many quirks, as well as some severe firmware 
bugs when it came to LLDP that prevented the phones from learning the voice 
VLAN.

As unimpressed as I was with the quality of the software, the support was 
another matter.  We were crunched for time as far as the schedule for 
installing the switch for the customer went, but rather than start by going 
through the hassle of returning the switch and sourcing a different one, I 
decided to see what would happen if I opened a ticket with them.  I had a 
hot-off-the-presses new firmware build that had been made directly in response 
to my ticket in my inbox inside of a week.  I don't think I've ever before 
experienced such a quick turnaround from a vendor in response to a software 
defect report.

I am not sure yet if that will be enough to retain my business in the future -- 
for PoE applications, EdgeSwitches seem to be significantly cheaper per-port 
and the software quality is arguably higher, although they also aren't without 
their own quirks and problems -- but it certainly hasn't hurt their chances, I 
can tell you that.

The disclaimers I'll add is that we bought our switch directly from their main 
U.S. distributor, Versa Technologies, and we opened our ticket up directly with 
them via their Zendesk (http://vtek.zendesk.com).  I don't know if you get the 
same treatment if you buy through different channels, but it's worth a shot.

The one issue with half the SFP ports on one particular switch no longer 
lighting up sounds like a hardware defect.  If it's new I don't know why you 
would hesitate either to return it for a refund or for warranty 
repair/replacement.

-- Nathan

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 12:16 PM
To: 'af@afmug.com'
Subject: [AFMUG] Planet Switches Suck Ass?

Anyone use the larger Planet switches?

I've got five of the 48 port SFP switches (with 4 port SFP+).

They are total crap.

Brand new out of box, and a few hours later one switch can't seem to bring up 
lights on ports 25-48 anymore.

Four of them have issues with SFP+ port disconnecting and not reconnecting 
anymore.
They also blink out and show lights on an SFP+ port with activity THAT HAS 
NOTHING PLUGGED IN.

This is specifically for the GS-5220-46S2C4X.

Does anyone have any special contact with them, or a contact person/email?

Re: [AFMUG] Planet Switches Suck Ass?

[Nathan Anderson]

I cannot speak to the particular model # you referenced, but we have deployed a 
WGSW-48040HP (48-port copper gigabit PoE, used to power a VoIP installation for 
a customer site).  Hardware-wise it has been fine, but the software was another 
story.  It had (and still has) many quirks, as well as some severe firmware 
bugs when it came to LLDP that prevented the phones from learning the voice 
VLAN.

As unimpressed as I was with the quality of the software, the support was 
another matter.  We were crunched for time as far as the schedule for 
installing the switch for the customer went, but rather than start by going 
through the hassle of returning the switch and sourcing a different one, I 
decided to see what would happen if I opened a ticket with them.  I had a 
hot-off-the-presses new firmware build that had been made directly in response 
to my ticket in my inbox inside of a week.  I don't think I've ever before 
experienced such a quick turnaround from a vendor in response to a software 
defect report.

I am not sure yet if that will be enough to retain my business in the future -- 
for PoE applications, EdgeSwitches seem to be significantly cheaper per-port 
and the software quality is arguably higher, although they also aren't without 
their own quirks and problems -- but it certainly hasn't hurt their chances, I 
can tell you that.

The disclaimers I'll add is that we bought our switch directly from their main 
U.S. distributor, Versa Technologies, and we opened our ticket up directly with 
them via their Zendesk (http://vtek.zendesk.com).  I don't know if you get the 
same treatment if you buy through different channels, but it's worth a shot.

The one issue with half the SFP ports on one particular switch no longer 
lighting up sounds like a hardware defect.  If it's new I don't know why you 
would hesitate either to return it for a refund or for warranty 
repair/replacement.

-- Nathan

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sterling Jacobson
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 12:16 PM
To: 'af@afmug.com'
Subject: [AFMUG] Planet Switches Suck Ass?

Anyone use the larger Planet switches?

I've got five of the 48 port SFP switches (with 4 port SFP+).

They are total crap.

Brand new out of box, and a few hours later one switch can't seem to bring up 
lights on ports 25-48 anymore.

Four of them have issues with SFP+ port disconnecting and not reconnecting 
anymore.
They also blink out and show lights on an SFP+ port with activity THAT HAS 
NOTHING PLUGGED IN.

This is specifically for the GS-5220-46S2C4X.

Does anyone have any special contact with them, or a contact person/email?

Re: [AFMUG] Planet Switches Suck Ass?

[George Skorup]

I only have experience with the MGSW-28240F. They're OK and I haven't 
had any h/w reliability issues with them. I'm not sure if it's the 
language barrier or what, but I pointed out some issues and got nowhere. 
Shit is still broken, no updates for months. Since we're planning a move 
to GPON for new customers anyway, probably just gonna go with some 
shelves w/ line cards for the existing AE customers and pull the Planet 
switches.


On 7/5/2017 2:16 PM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:

Anyone use the larger Planet switches?

I've got five of the 48 port SFP switches (with 4 port SFP+).

They are total crap.

Brand new out of box, and a few hours later one switch can't seem to bring up 
lights on ports 25-48 anymore.

Four of them have issues with SFP+ port disconnecting and not reconnecting 
anymore.
They also blink out and show lights on an SFP+ port with activity THAT HAS 
NOTHING PLUGGED IN.

This is specifically for the GS-5220-46S2C4X.

Does anyone have any special contact with them, or a contact person/email?

Re: [AFMUG] Access Control for gated community

[Jaime Solorza]

I am reading up on software ..they already called me to help them.

Jaime Solorza

On Jul 5, 2017 1:48 PM, "Chuck Hogg"  wrote:

> I use a USB to serial adapter for our old Plotter that uses serial...You
> can probably get one of those...install the drivers and be done.
>
> Regards,
> Chuck
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Jaime Solorza 
> wrote:
>
>> They bought new PC with Windows 10 and installed software with client
>> database...old system was Windows 7 with 9 pin serial connector that worked
>> for several years...it looks like their guy installed a serial to Ethernet
>> converter and now can't get access to control panel.  He has been at it for
>> three weeks.  If he can't get going they want to hire me to give it a shot.
>> It's a Linear Access Base 2000 system.  I was recommended by new camera
>> systems guy.  I asked questions and took pictures.  Didn't offer any
>> consultant advice.
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>> On Jul 5, 2017 1:13 PM, "Josh Luthman" 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> What are you supposed to be accomplishing?
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Jaime Solorza >> > wrote:
>>>
 Not touching anything yet...just took some pictures and asked
 questions...

 Jaime Solorza

 On Jul 5, 2017 12:02 PM, "Lewis Bergman" 
 wrote:

> We have gotten the same thing a few times. Some are computer
> controlled, others pretty simple. I doubt you'll have any issues with it.
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:51 PM Jaime Solorza <
> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ha...I got a call from a property manager asking for help with gate
>> access control.  Some camera company recommended me telling them I can
>> figure most things out.  I appreciate the compliment but I have never
>> worked on access control system like this.   Taking my meters and tools 
>> and
>> rosary.   Any heads up from the Borg? Tips?
>>
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>
>>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Access Control for gated community

[Chuck Hogg]

I use a USB to serial adapter for our old Plotter that uses serial...You
can probably get one of those...install the drivers and be done.

Regards,
Chuck

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

> They bought new PC with Windows 10 and installed software with client
> database...old system was Windows 7 with 9 pin serial connector that worked
> for several years...it looks like their guy installed a serial to Ethernet
> converter and now can't get access to control panel.  He has been at it for
> three weeks.  If he can't get going they want to hire me to give it a shot.
> It's a Linear Access Base 2000 system.  I was recommended by new camera
> systems guy.  I asked questions and took pictures.  Didn't offer any
> consultant advice.
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Jul 5, 2017 1:13 PM, "Josh Luthman" 
> wrote:
>
>> What are you supposed to be accomplishing?
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Jaime Solorza 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Not touching anything yet...just took some pictures and asked
>>> questions...
>>>
>>> Jaime Solorza
>>>
>>> On Jul 5, 2017 12:02 PM, "Lewis Bergman" 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 We have gotten the same thing a few times. Some are computer
 controlled, others pretty simple. I doubt you'll have any issues with it.

 On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:51 PM Jaime Solorza <
 losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ha...I got a call from a property manager asking for help with gate
> access control.  Some camera company recommended me telling them I can
> figure most things out.  I appreciate the compliment but I have never
> worked on access control system like this.   Taking my meters and tools 
> and
> rosary.   Any heads up from the Borg? Tips?
>
>
> Jaime Solorza
>

>>

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik 6.37.1 ethernet counters - Broken?

[George Skorup]

493 what? The 493 and 493AH switch controller is dumb and will not give 
you any port error stats. The 493G switch controllers will. And pretty 
much any other board with gigabit interfaces will as well.


On 7/5/2017 2:29 PM, Wireless Administrator wrote:


I see.  We’re running RB493 on this install.

Steve

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 05, 2017 2:38 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik 6.37.1 ethernet counters - Broken?

I think it matters what hardware you have, not software version.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Wireless Administrator 
> wrote:


Can anyone confirm that Mikrotik Ethernet error counters work in 
6.37.1 and newer software?  I’m trying to identify a problem and was 
surprised to see all zeros on these counters.  These are columns that 
need to be added “Right Mouse, show columns” for them to display.  I 
can’t say that they ever worked since I have never tried to use them 
in the past.


Steve

Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

[Chuck Hogg]

https://phys.org/news/2017-05-spacex-thousands-internet-satellites.html


Regards,
Chuck

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Mike Hammett  wrote:

> Some companies (more than one) are planning on launching 4,000 satellites
> each.
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Midwest Internet Exchange 
> 
> 
> 
> The Brothers WISP 
> 
>
>
> 
> --
> *From: *"Sterling Jacobson" 
> *To: *af@afmug.com
> *Sent: *Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:09:57 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?
>
> 900 f’n satellites? Jeez, isn’t there some sort of international
> consortium that says that’s more than enough?
>
>
>
> That’s going to be over 1Tbps capacity network wide?
>
>
>
> That should definitely help the digital divide for remote areas.
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Rory Conaway
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:01 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?
>
>
>
> None of these guys know what’s about to hit them with Viasat 2 and Viasat
> 3.  Other than the latency for gaming and voice, Viasat 2 can hit up to
> 1Gbps and it goes live in January.  Viasat 3 will by up by 2019 or 2020 and
> several times faster than Viasat 2.
>
> Rory
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] *On
> Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:47 AM
> *To:* Animal Farm 
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?
>
>
>
> Sure...fill up the sky with more stuff, how the hell are my buddies
> supposed to navigate through safely?  Lots of people still need to be probed
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
>
>
> On Jul 5, 2017 10:21 AM, "Lewis Bergman"  wrote:
>
> *OneWeb Satellites Preps for Global Broadband Service*
>
> OneWeb Satellites cranked up its assembly line last week in Toulouse,
> France to begin end-to-end validation, testing, and integration of its
> first satellites set for launch in just over nine months. The move comes
> after the FCC granted the company authority to access the U.S. market using
> its proposed non-geostationary Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite
> constellation. OneWeb says its satellites will enable carriers and ISPs to
> offer affordable broadband access in rural areas.
>
> OneWeb Satellites
> 
>  is
> a joint venture between OneWeb communications and Airbus Defense and Space.
> The Toulouse factory will validate production methods for a larger factory
> near the Kennedy Space Center, FL. The company plans to initially launch 10
> satellites, and grow the constellation to 900 satellites to offer
> high-speed internet with global coverage and bridge the digital divide by
> 2027.
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Access Control for gated community

[Jaime Solorza]

They bought new PC with Windows 10 and installed software with client
database...old system was Windows 7 with 9 pin serial connector that worked
for several years...it looks like their guy installed a serial to Ethernet
converter and now can't get access to control panel.  He has been at it for
three weeks.  If he can't get going they want to hire me to give it a shot.
It's a Linear Access Base 2000 system.  I was recommended by new camera
systems guy.  I asked questions and took pictures.  Didn't offer any
consultant advice.

Jaime Solorza

On Jul 5, 2017 1:13 PM, "Josh Luthman"  wrote:

> What are you supposed to be accomplishing?
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Jaime Solorza 
> wrote:
>
>> Not touching anything yet...just took some pictures and asked questions...
>>
>> Jaime Solorza
>>
>> On Jul 5, 2017 12:02 PM, "Lewis Bergman"  wrote:
>>
>>> We have gotten the same thing a few times. Some are computer controlled,
>>> others pretty simple. I doubt you'll have any issues with it.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:51 PM Jaime Solorza 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Ha...I got a call from a property manager asking for help with gate
 access control.  Some camera company recommended me telling them I can
 figure most things out.  I appreciate the compliment but I have never
 worked on access control system like this.   Taking my meters and tools and
 rosary.   Any heads up from the Borg? Tips?


 Jaime Solorza

>>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik 6.37.1 ethernet counters - Broken?

[Wireless Administrator]

I see.  We’re running RB493 on this install.

 

Steve

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 2:38 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik 6.37.1 ethernet counters - Broken?

 

I think it matters what hardware you have, not software version.




 

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

 

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Wireless Administrator  wrote:

Can anyone confirm that Mikrotik Ethernet error counters work in 6.37.1 and 
newer software?  I’m trying to identify a problem and was surprised to see all 
zeros on these counters.  These are columns that need to be added “Right Mouse, 
show columns” for them to display.  I can’t say that they ever worked since I 
have never tried to use them in the past.

 

Steve 

 

 

 

 



 

[AFMUG] Planet Switches Suck Ass?

[Sterling Jacobson]

Anyone use the larger Planet switches?

I've got five of the 48 port SFP switches (with 4 port SFP+).

They are total crap.

Brand new out of box, and a few hours later one switch can't seem to bring up 
lights on ports 25-48 anymore.

Four of them have issues with SFP+ port disconnecting and not reconnecting 
anymore.
They also blink out and show lights on an SFP+ port with activity THAT HAS 
NOTHING PLUGGED IN.

This is specifically for the GS-5220-46S2C4X.

Does anyone have any special contact with them, or a contact person/email?

Re: [AFMUG] Access Control for gated community

[Josh Luthman]

What are you supposed to be accomplishing?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

> Not touching anything yet...just took some pictures and asked questions...
>
> Jaime Solorza
>
> On Jul 5, 2017 12:02 PM, "Lewis Bergman"  wrote:
>
>> We have gotten the same thing a few times. Some are computer controlled,
>> others pretty simple. I doubt you'll have any issues with it.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:51 PM Jaime Solorza 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ha...I got a call from a property manager asking for help with gate
>>> access control.  Some camera company recommended me telling them I can
>>> figure most things out.  I appreciate the compliment but I have never
>>> worked on access control system like this.   Taking my meters and tools and
>>> rosary.   Any heads up from the Borg? Tips?
>>>
>>>
>>> Jaime Solorza
>>>
>>

Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

[Mike Hammett]

Some companies (more than one) are planning on launching 4,000 satellites each. 




- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




- Original Message -

From: "Sterling Jacobson"  
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 2:09:57 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0? 



900 f’n satellites? Jeez, isn’t there some sort of international consortium 
that says that’s more than enough? 

That’s going to be over 1Tbps capacity network wide? 

That should definitely help the digital divide for remote areas. 



From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway 
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:01 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0? 

None of these guys know what’s about to hit them with Viasat 2 and Viasat 3. 
Other than the latency for gaming and voice, Viasat 2 can hit up to 1Gbps and 
it goes live in January. Viasat 3 will by up by 2019 or 2020 and several times 
faster than Viasat 2. 

Rory 

From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza 
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:47 AM 
To: Animal Farm < af@afmug.com > 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0? 


Sure...fill up the sky with more stuff, how the hell are my buddies supposed to 
navigate through safely? Lots of people still need to be probed 

Jaime Solorza 



On Jul 5, 2017 10:21 AM, "Lewis Bergman" < lewis.berg...@gmail.com > wrote: 





OneWeb Satellites Preps for Global Broadband Service 


OneWeb Satellites cranked up its assembly line last week in Toulouse, France to 
begin end-to-end validation, testing, and integration of its first satellites 
set for launch in just over nine months. The move comes after the FCC granted 
the company authority to access the U.S. market using its proposed 
non-geostationary Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellation. OneWeb says 
its satellites will enable carriers and ISPs to offer affordable broadband 
access in rural areas. 

OneWeb Satellites is a joint venture between OneWeb communications and Airbus 
Defense and Space. The Toulouse factory will validate production methods for a 
larger factory near the Kennedy Space Center, FL. The company plans to 
initially launch 10 satellites, and grow the constellation to 900 satellites to 
offer high-speed internet with global coverage and bridge the digital divide by 
2027. 

Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

[Sterling Jacobson]

900 f’n satellites? Jeez, isn’t there some sort of international consortium 
that says that’s more than enough?

That’s going to be over 1Tbps capacity network wide?

That should definitely help the digital divide for remote areas.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 1:01 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

None of these guys know what’s about to hit them with Viasat 2 and Viasat 3.  
Other than the latency for gaming and voice, Viasat 2 can hit up to 1Gbps and 
it goes live in January.  Viasat 3 will by up by 2019 or 2020 and several times 
faster than Viasat 2.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:47 AM
To: Animal Farm >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

Sure...fill up the sky with more stuff, how the hell are my buddies supposed to 
navigate through safely?  Lots of people still need to be probed
Jaime Solorza

On Jul 5, 2017 10:21 AM, "Lewis Bergman" 
> wrote:
OneWeb Satellites Preps for Global Broadband Service


[https://gallery.mailchimp.com/d1b803ea3d99f4c1c1335a213/images/7db4b3f3-8969-43ad-9749-561df52d7ae8.jpg]OneWeb
 Satellites cranked up its assembly line last week in Toulouse, France to begin 
end-to-end validation, testing, and integration of its first satellites set for 
launch in just over nine months. The move comes after the FCC granted the 
company authority to access the U.S. market using its proposed 
non-geostationary Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellation. OneWeb says 
its satellites will enable carriers and ISPs to offer affordable broadband 
access in rural areas.

OneWeb 
Satellites
 is a joint venture between OneWeb communications and Airbus Defense and Space. 
The Toulouse factory will validate production methods for a larger factory near 
the Kennedy Space Center, FL. The company plans to initially launch 10 
satellites, and grow the constellation to 900 satellites to offer high-speed 
internet with global coverage and bridge the digital divide by 2027.

Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

[Rory Conaway]

None of these guys know what’s about to hit them with Viasat 2 and Viasat 3.  
Other than the latency for gaming and voice, Viasat 2 can hit up to 1Gbps and 
it goes live in January.  Viasat 3 will by up by 2019 or 2020 and several times 
faster than Viasat 2.

Rory

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 10:47 AM
To: Animal Farm 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

Sure...fill up the sky with more stuff, how the hell are my buddies supposed to 
navigate through safely?  Lots of people still need to be probed
Jaime Solorza

On Jul 5, 2017 10:21 AM, "Lewis Bergman" 
> wrote:
OneWeb Satellites Preps for Global Broadband Service


[https://gallery.mailchimp.com/d1b803ea3d99f4c1c1335a213/images/7db4b3f3-8969-43ad-9749-561df52d7ae8.jpg]OneWeb
 Satellites cranked up its assembly line last week in Toulouse, France to begin 
end-to-end validation, testing, and integration of its first satellites set for 
launch in just over nine months. The move comes after the FCC granted the 
company authority to access the U.S. market using its proposed 
non-geostationary Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite constellation. OneWeb says 
its satellites will enable carriers and ISPs to offer affordable broadband 
access in rural areas.

OneWeb 
Satellites
 is a joint venture between OneWeb communications and Airbus Defense and Space. 
The Toulouse factory will validate production methods for a larger factory near 
the Kennedy Space Center, FL. The company plans to initially launch 10 
satellites, and grow the constellation to 900 satellites to offer high-speed 
internet with global coverage and bridge the digital divide by 2027.

Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik 6.37.1 ethernet counters - Broken?

[Josh Luthman]

I think it matters what hardware you have, not software version.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Wireless Administrator 
wrote:

> Can anyone confirm that Mikrotik Ethernet error counters work in 6.37.1
> and newer software?  I’m trying to identify a problem and was surprised to
> see all zeros on these counters.  These are columns that need to be added
> “Right Mouse, show columns” for them to display.  I can’t say that they
> ever worked since I have never tried to use them in the past.
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] ot TSLA

[Jon Langeler]

Thanks for sharing as usual...

Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.


> On Jul 5, 2017, at 12:40 PM, Chuck McCown  wrote:
> 
> May be an opportunity coming again.  Lots of folks shorted the stock.  If it 
> hits $300 I will buy again. 

Re: [AFMUG] Access Control for gated community

[Lewis Bergman]

We have gotten the same thing a few times. Some are computer controlled,
others pretty simple. I doubt you'll have any issues with it.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:51 PM Jaime Solorza 
wrote:

> Ha...I got a call from a property manager asking for help with gate access
> control.  Some camera company recommended me telling them I can figure most
> things out.  I appreciate the compliment but I have never worked on access
> control system like this.   Taking my meters and tools and rosary.   Any
> heads up from the Borg? Tips?
>
>
> Jaime Solorza
>

[AFMUG] Access Control for gated community

[Jaime Solorza]

Ha...I got a call from a property manager asking for help with gate access
control.  Some camera company recommended me telling them I can figure most
things out.  I appreciate the compliment but I have never worked on access
control system like this.   Taking my meters and tools and rosary.   Any
heads up from the Borg? Tips?

Jaime Solorza

Re: [AFMUG] ot TSLA

[Chris Wright]

Earnings report coming up in a month with expected losses, but with the
Model 3 rollout happening on time - makes things interesting.

 

Chris Wright

Network Administrator

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2017 9:40 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] ot TSLA

 

May be an opportunity coming again.  Lots of folks shorted the stock.  If it
hits $300 I will buy again.  

[AFMUG] Mikrotik 6.37.1 ethernet counters - Broken?

[Wireless Administrator]

Can anyone confirm that Mikrotik Ethernet error counters work in 6.37.1 and
newer software?  I'm trying to identify a problem and was surprised to see
all zeros on these counters.  These are columns that need to be added "Right
Mouse, show columns" for them to display.  I can't say that they ever worked
since I have never tried to use them in the past.

 

Steve 

 

 

 

 

[AFMUG] ot TSLA

[Chuck McCown]

May be an opportunity coming again.  Lots of folks shorted the stock.  If it 
hits $300 I will buy again.  

[AFMUG] Iridium 2.0?

[Lewis Bergman]

*OneWeb Satellites Preps for Global Broadband Service*
OneWeb Satellites cranked up its assembly line last week in Toulouse,
France to begin end-to-end validation, testing, and integration of its
first satellites set for launch in just over nine months. The move comes
after the FCC granted the company authority to access the U.S. market using
its proposed non-geostationary Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite
constellation. OneWeb says its satellites will enable carriers and ISPs to
offer affordable broadband access in rural areas.

OneWeb Satellites

is
a joint venture between OneWeb communications and Airbus Defense and Space.
The Toulouse factory will validate production methods for a larger factory
near the Kennedy Space Center, FL. The company plans to initially launch 10
satellites, and grow the constellation to 900 satellites to offer
high-speed internet with global coverage and bridge the digital divide by
2027.

[AFMUG] Text messaging services

[Adair Winter]

I'm looking for a service that will allow me to load in lists of numbers to
send text messages to. I'd like to be able to manage the lists from a web
gui or possible integrate with some CRM. I'd like for the users to be able
to unsubscribe from the texts by sending STOP or whatever.

Does anyone have any experience with such a beast?

-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net