Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
FYI: moving the IP Address ranges off the BMU to another in the mirror group makes all the difference in the world. The snmp monitoring croaks out the NX216 somewhere over 200mb We are clean pushing up to 300mb across this one tonite after moving a few hundred ip ranges off. we are going to bring up another old retired BMU with nothing more than IP access to the network and move all ip ranges to that as nothing more than an snmp probe to get us through til the mikrotik implemenetaion is full production while we review out long term options. BTW powercode was pretty responsive today and very frank on the underlying issues and the long term solutions. I was satisfied with what they had to say because it fully explained what was going on. didn't have a today fix, but the root cause was acknowleged On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > just got off the phone with them, it looks promising, resolves some major > limitations. I may end up putting a couple of ours in play today or > tomorrow just to offset load > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Christopher Tyler < > ch...@totalhighspeed.net> wrote: > >> Don't know about any documentation but we will be testing out the >> Mikrotik "BMU" as soon as we can. >> >> -- >> Christopher Tyler >> MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE >> Total Highspeed Internet Services >> 417.851.1107 >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> To: af@afmug.com >> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 11:00:05 AM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >> >> is there any documentation now anywhere? I cant find anything outside >> change logs and videos. >> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > yeah, mikrotik used to be an option when imagestream was an option >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com >> > > wrote: >> > >> >> Back? No. Never had Mikrotik. In ancient times it was CentOS, then >> >> ImageStream, then their own. >> >> >> >> You'll still need a BMU of sorts for SNMP, monitoring, etc but the >> duties >> >> of queues/routes/redirect/packet pushing are the bigger demands. >> >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> >> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >> >> 1100 Wayne St >> >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+ >> OH+45373=gmail=g> >> >> Suite 1337 >> >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+ >> OH+45373=gmail=g> >> >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+ >> OH+45373=gmail=g> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Steve Jones < >> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >>> theyre going back to mikrotiks? >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Josh Luthman < >> >>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Mikrotik integrated is starting, I'd wait until that's done and avoid >> >>>> buying an official "BMU". >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Josh Luthman >> >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >> >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >> >>>> 1100 Wayne St >> >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+ >> OH+45373=gmail=g> >> >>>> Suite 1337 >> >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+ >> OH+45373=gmail=g> >> >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >> >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+ >> OH+45373=gmail=g> >> >>>> >> >>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Steve Jones < >> >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at >> >>>>> least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses >> a guy >> >>>>> off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> weve been
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
just got off the phone with them, it looks promising, resolves some major limitations. I may end up putting a couple of ours in play today or tomorrow just to offset load On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Christopher Tyler < ch...@totalhighspeed.net> wrote: > Don't know about any documentation but we will be testing out the Mikrotik > "BMU" as soon as we can. > > -- > Christopher Tyler > MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE > Total Highspeed Internet Services > 417.851.1107 > > - Original Message - > From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 11:00:05 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs > > is there any documentation now anywhere? I cant find anything outside > change logs and videos. > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > yeah, mikrotik used to be an option when imagestream was an option > > > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Josh Luthman < > j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > > > wrote: > > > >> Back? No. Never had Mikrotik. In ancient times it was CentOS, then > >> ImageStream, then their own. > >> > >> You'll still need a BMU of sorts for SNMP, monitoring, etc but the > duties > >> of queues/routes/redirect/packet pushing are the bigger demands. > >> > >> > >> Josh Luthman > >> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > >> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> > >> 1100 Wayne St > >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy, > +OH+45373=gmail=g> > >> Suite 1337 > >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy, > +OH+45373=gmail=g> > >> Troy, OH 45373 > >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy, > +OH+45373=gmail=g> > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Steve Jones < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> theyre going back to mikrotiks? > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Josh Luthman < > >>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Mikrotik integrated is starting, I'd wait until that's done and avoid > >>>> buying an official "BMU". > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Josh Luthman > >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> > >>>> 1100 Wayne St > >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy, > +OH+45373=gmail=g> > >>>> Suite 1337 > >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy, > +OH+45373=gmail=g> > >>>> Troy, OH 45373 > >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy, > +OH+45373=gmail=g> > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Steve Jones < > >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at > >>>>> least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a > guy > >>>>> off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. > >>>>> > >>>>> weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has > >>>>> increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm > >>>>> understanding the attacked MT correctly. > >>>>> > >>>>> This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring > >>>>> devices on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer > >>>>> latencies. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter < > >>>>> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < > >>>>>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or > >>>>>>> so accounts or higher. > >>>>>>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being > high(er) > >>>>>>> on your billing server. > >>>>>>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to > >>>>>>> 700 customers i think. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> - Original Message - > >>>>>>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com > >>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM > >>>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a > >>>>>>> bmu, but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard > tertiary sites I > >>>>>>> don't seem to be able to find any specs > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Adair Winter > >>>>>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner > >>>>>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071> > >>>>>> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180> > >>>>>> http://www.amarillowireless.net > >>>>>> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
Don't know about any documentation but we will be testing out the Mikrotik "BMU" as soon as we can. -- Christopher Tyler MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE Total Highspeed Internet Services 417.851.1107 - Original Message - From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 11:00:05 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs is there any documentation now anywhere? I cant find anything outside change logs and videos. On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > yeah, mikrotik used to be an option when imagestream was an option > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > > wrote: > >> Back? No. Never had Mikrotik. In ancient times it was CentOS, then >> ImageStream, then their own. >> >> You'll still need a BMU of sorts for SNMP, monitoring, etc but the duties >> of queues/routes/redirect/packet pushing are the bigger demands. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >> 1100 Wayne St >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >> Suite 1337 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >> Troy, OH 45373 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> theyre going back to mikrotiks? >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Josh Luthman < >>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Mikrotik integrated is starting, I'd wait until that's done and avoid >>>> buying an official "BMU". >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Steve Jones < >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at >>>>> least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy >>>>> off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. >>>>> >>>>> weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has >>>>> increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm >>>>> understanding the attacked MT correctly. >>>>> >>>>> This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring >>>>> devices on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer >>>>> latencies. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter < >>>>> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >>>>>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or >>>>>>> so accounts or higher. >>>>>>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) >>>>>>> on your billing server. >>>>>>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to >>>>>>> 700 customers i think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Original Message - >>>>>>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >>>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a >>>>>>> bmu, but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary >>>>>>> sites I >>>>>>> don't seem to be able to find any specs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Adair Winter >>>>>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >>>>>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071> >>>>>> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180> >>>>>> http://www.amarillowireless.net >>>>>> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
is there any documentation now anywhere? I cant find anything outside change logs and videos. On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > yeah, mikrotik used to be an option when imagestream was an option > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > > wrote: > >> Back? No. Never had Mikrotik. In ancient times it was CentOS, then >> ImageStream, then their own. >> >> You'll still need a BMU of sorts for SNMP, monitoring, etc but the duties >> of queues/routes/redirect/packet pushing are the bigger demands. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >> 1100 Wayne St >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >> Suite 1337 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >> Troy, OH 45373 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> theyre going back to mikrotiks? >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Josh Luthman < >>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Mikrotik integrated is starting, I'd wait until that's done and avoid >>>> buying an official "BMU". >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Steve Jones < >>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at >>>>> least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy >>>>> off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. >>>>> >>>>> weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has >>>>> increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm >>>>> understanding the attacked MT correctly. >>>>> >>>>> This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring >>>>> devices on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer >>>>> latencies. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter < >>>>> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >>>>>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or >>>>>>> so accounts or higher. >>>>>>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) >>>>>>> on your billing server. >>>>>>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to >>>>>>> 700 customers i think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Original Message - >>>>>>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >>>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a >>>>>>> bmu, but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary >>>>>>> sites I >>>>>>> don't seem to be able to find any specs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Adair Winter >>>>>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >>>>>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071> >>>>>> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180> >>>>>> http://www.amarillowireless.net >>>>>> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
yeah, mikrotik used to be an option when imagestream was an option On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > Back? No. Never had Mikrotik. In ancient times it was CentOS, then > ImageStream, then their own. > > You'll still need a BMU of sorts for SNMP, monitoring, etc but the duties > of queues/routes/redirect/packet pushing are the bigger demands. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> > Suite 1337 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> > Troy, OH 45373 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> theyre going back to mikrotiks? >> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >>> Mikrotik integrated is starting, I'd wait until that's done and avoid >>> buying an official "BMU". >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >>> Suite 1337 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at >>>> least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy >>>> off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. >>>> >>>> weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has >>>> increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm >>>> understanding the attacked MT correctly. >>>> >>>> This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring >>>> devices on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer >>>> latencies. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter < >>>> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >>>>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or >>>>>> so accounts or higher. >>>>>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) >>>>>> on your billing server. >>>>>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 >>>>>> customers i think. >>>>>> >>>>>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - Original Message - >>>>>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >>>>>> >>>>>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a >>>>>> bmu, but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary >>>>>> sites I >>>>>> don't seem to be able to find any specs >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Adair Winter >>>>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >>>>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071> >>>>> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180> >>>>> http://www.amarillowireless.net >>>>> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
Back? No. Never had Mikrotik. In ancient times it was CentOS, then ImageStream, then their own. You'll still need a BMU of sorts for SNMP, monitoring, etc but the duties of queues/routes/redirect/packet pushing are the bigger demands. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > theyre going back to mikrotiks? > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > > wrote: > >> Mikrotik integrated is starting, I'd wait until that's done and avoid >> buying an official "BMU". >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> >> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> >> 1100 Wayne St >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >> Suite 1337 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >> Troy, OH 45373 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> >> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at >>> least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy >>> off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. >>> >>> weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has >>> increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm >>> understanding the attacked MT correctly. >>> >>> This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring devices >>> on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer latencies. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter < >>> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote: >>> >>>> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >>>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or so >>>>> accounts or higher. >>>>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) >>>>> on your billing server. >>>>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 >>>>> customers i think. >>>>> >>>>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - Original Message - >>>>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >>>>> >>>>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu, >>>>> but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I >>>>> don't seem to be able to find any specs >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Adair Winter >>>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >>>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071> >>>> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180> >>>> http://www.amarillowireless.net >>>> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
theyre going back to mikrotiks? On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > Mikrotik integrated is starting, I'd wait until that's done and avoid > buying an official "BMU". > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> > Suite 1337 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> > Troy, OH 45373 > <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373=gmail=g> > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at least >> the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy off when >> hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. >> >> weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has >> increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm >> understanding the attacked MT correctly. >> >> This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring devices >> on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer latencies. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter < >> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote: >> >>> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or so >>>> accounts or higher. >>>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) on >>>> your billing server. >>>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 >>>> customers i think. >>>> >>>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - Original Message - >>>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >>>> >>>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu, >>>> but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I >>>> don't seem to be able to find any specs >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Adair Winter >>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071> >>> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180> >>> http://www.amarillowireless.net >>> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >>> >>> >>> >> >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
Mikrotik integrated is starting, I'd wait until that's done and avoid buying an official "BMU". Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at least > the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy off when > hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. > > weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has increased. > As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm understanding the > attacked MT correctly. > > This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring devices > on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer latencies. > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net > > wrote: > >> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or so >>> accounts or higher. >>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) on >>> your billing server. >>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 >>> customers i think. >>> >>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >>> >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >>> >>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu, >>> but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I >>> don't seem to be able to find any specs >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Adair Winter >> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071> >> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180> >> http://www.amarillowireless.net >> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >> >> >> >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
Good place to start!
On 9/25/2017 10:14 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
...that you are
is sonar casts the place to go "to find out more"?
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software
<mailto:simon@sonar.software>> wrote:
I'm here talking to you at 10PM on a Monday
On 9/25/2017 10:08 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
there is production and there is production.
I see this: "If you just need to talk to someone, we're here for
that, too <https://sonar.software/contact>."
Are there any ***fine prints on this? Because sometimes I get
lonely and just need somebody to talk to
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Simon Westlake
<simon@sonar.software <mailto:simon@sonar.software>> wrote:
Been production for a long time now! Hit v1 last year.
On 9/25/2017 10:00 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
is sonar fully in production or alpha beta state?
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Simon Westlake
<simon@sonar.software <mailto:simon@sonar.software>> wrote:
I'm not a hater, I'm still here.
On 9/25/2017 9:58 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
hater
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Simon Westlake
<simon@sonar.software <mailto:simon@sonar.software>> wrote:
Mmmm.. no.
On 9/25/2017 9:34 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
Simon... please, please, please come back
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Steve Jones
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the
lighter used NX216 so at least the monitoring
offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses
a guy off when hardware specs are removed,
really pisses the guy off.
weve been running 750 or so through this one,
but bandwidth has increased. As best I can
tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm
understanding the attacked MT correctly.
This started with monitoring anomalies, high
pings on monitoring devices on the BMU, but no
customer impact, now its croaking customer
latencies.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter
<ada...@amarillowireless.net
<mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net>> wrote:
I think we started having issues around
600 or 800 subs on our NX216
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay
Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net
<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote:
i have heard rumor you might have
problems with a nx216 with 500 or so
accounts or higher.
the symptom is when you see "bmu
queue" counter start being high(er) on
your billing server.
we have not run into this yet and are
still on a nx216 - close to 700
customers i think.
we have been adding and removing a lot
(of customers) lately
- Original Message -
*From:* Steve Jones
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
*To:* af@afmug.com
<mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017
8:47 PM
*Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
anybody know where the hardware
details are? I think we outgrew a
bmu, but with the whole new
nonsense website and haphazard
tertiary sites I don't seem to be
able to find any specs
--
Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
<tel:%28806%29%20316-5071>
C: 806.231.7180 <tel:%28806%29%20231-7180>
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net/>
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
...that you are is sonar casts the place to go "to find out more"? On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software> wrote: > I'm here talking to you at 10PM on a Monday > > On 9/25/2017 10:08 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > > there is production and there is production. > > I see this: "If you just need to talk to someone, we're here for that, too > <https://sonar.software/contact>." > > Are there any ***fine prints on this? Because sometimes I get lonely and > just need somebody to talk to > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software> > wrote: > >> Been production for a long time now! Hit v1 last year. >> >> On 9/25/2017 10:00 PM, Steve Jones wrote: >> >> is sonar fully in production or alpha beta state? >> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm not a hater, I'm still here. >>> >>> On 9/25/2017 9:58 PM, Steve Jones wrote: >>> >>> hater >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Mmmm.. no. >>>> >>>> On 9/25/2017 9:34 PM, Steve Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> Simon... please, please, please come back >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at >>>>> least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy >>>>> off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. >>>>> >>>>> weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has >>>>> increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm >>>>> understanding the attacked MT correctly. >>>>> >>>>> This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring >>>>> devices on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer >>>>> latencies. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter < >>>>> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >>>>>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or >>>>>>> so accounts or higher. >>>>>>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) >>>>>>> on your billing server. >>>>>>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to >>>>>>> 700 customers i think. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Original Message - >>>>>>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >>>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a >>>>>>> bmu, but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary >>>>>>> sites I >>>>>>> don't seem to be able to find any specs >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Adair Winter >>>>>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >>>>>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <%28806%29%20316-5071> >>>>>> C: 806.231.7180 <%28806%29%20231-7180> >>>>>> http://www.amarillowireless.net >>>>>> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Simon Westlake >>>> Email: simon@sonar.software >>>> Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA >>>> --- >>>> Sonar Software Inc >>>> The future of ISP billing and OSShttps://sonar.software >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Simon Westlake >>> Email: simon@sonar.software >>> Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA >>> --- >>> Sonar Software Inc >>> The future of ISP billing and OSShttps://sonar.software >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Simon Westlake >> Email: simon@sonar.software >> Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA >> --- >> Sonar Software Inc >> The future of ISP billing and OSShttps://sonar.software >> >> > > -- > Simon Westlake > Email: simon@sonar.software > Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA > --- > Sonar Software Inc > The future of ISP billing and OSShttps://sonar.software > >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
I'm here talking to you at 10PM on a Monday
On 9/25/2017 10:08 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
there is production and there is production.
I see this: "If you just need to talk to someone, we're here for that,
too <https://sonar.software/contact>."
Are there any ***fine prints on this? Because sometimes I get lonely
and just need somebody to talk to
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software
<mailto:simon@sonar.software>> wrote:
Been production for a long time now! Hit v1 last year.
On 9/25/2017 10:00 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
is sonar fully in production or alpha beta state?
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Simon Westlake
<simon@sonar.software <mailto:simon@sonar.software>> wrote:
I'm not a hater, I'm still here.
On 9/25/2017 9:58 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
hater
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Simon Westlake
<simon@sonar.software <mailto:simon@sonar.software>> wrote:
Mmmm.. no.
On 9/25/2017 9:34 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
Simon... please, please, please come back
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Steve Jones
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter
used NX216 so at least the monitoring offloads. but
I have to say, it really pisses a guy off when
hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off.
weve been running 750 or so through this one, but
bandwidth has increased. As best I can tell its not
heavy, like 20kpps if I'm understanding the
attacked MT correctly.
This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings
on monitoring devices on the BMU, but no customer
impact, now its croaking customer latencies.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter
<ada...@amarillowireless.net
<mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net>> wrote:
I think we started having issues around 600 or
800 subs on our NX216
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay
Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net
<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote:
i have heard rumor you might have problems
with a nx216 with 500 or so accounts or higher.
the symptom is when you see "bmu queue"
counter start being high(er) on your
billing server.
we have not run into this yet and are still
on a nx216 - close to 700 customers i think.
we have been adding and removing a lot (of
customers) lately
- Original Message -
*From:* Steve Jones
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM
*Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
anybody know where the hardware details
are? I think we outgrew a bmu, but with
the whole new nonsense website and
haphazard tertiary sites I don't seem
to be able to find any specs
--
Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
<tel:%28806%29%20316-5071>
C: 806.231.7180 <tel:%28806%29%20231-7180>
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net/>
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
--
Simon Westlake
Email:simon@sonar.software <mailto:simon@sonar.software>
Phone:(702) 447-1247 <tel:%28702%29%20447-1247> US /(780) 900-1180
<tel:%28780%29%20900-1180> CA
---
Sonar Software Inc
The future of ISP billing and OSS
https://sonar.software
--
Simon Westlake
Email:simon@sonar.software <mailto:simon@sonar.software>
Phone:(702) 447-1247 <tel:%28702%29%20447-1247> US /(780) 900-1180
<tel:%28780%29%20900-1180> CA
---
Sonar Software Inc
The future of ISP billing and OSS
h
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
there is production and there is production. I see this: "If you just need to talk to someone, we're here for that, too <https://sonar.software/contact>." Are there any ***fine prints on this? Because sometimes I get lonely and just need somebody to talk to On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software> wrote: > Been production for a long time now! Hit v1 last year. > > On 9/25/2017 10:00 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > > is sonar fully in production or alpha beta state? > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software> > wrote: > >> I'm not a hater, I'm still here. >> >> On 9/25/2017 9:58 PM, Steve Jones wrote: >> >> hater >> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software> >> wrote: >> >>> Mmmm.. no. >>> >>> On 9/25/2017 9:34 PM, Steve Jones wrote: >>> >>> Simon... please, please, please come back >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at >>>> least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy >>>> off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. >>>> >>>> weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has >>>> increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm >>>> understanding the attacked MT correctly. >>>> >>>> This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring >>>> devices on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer >>>> latencies. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter < >>>> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >>>>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or >>>>>> so accounts or higher. >>>>>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) >>>>>> on your billing server. >>>>>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 >>>>>> customers i think. >>>>>> >>>>>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> - Original Message - >>>>>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >>>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >>>>>> >>>>>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a >>>>>> bmu, but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary >>>>>> sites I >>>>>> don't seem to be able to find any specs >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Adair Winter >>>>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >>>>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <%28806%29%20316-5071> >>>>> C: 806.231.7180 <%28806%29%20231-7180> >>>>> http://www.amarillowireless.net >>>>> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Simon Westlake >>> Email: simon@sonar.software >>> Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA >>> --- >>> Sonar Software Inc >>> The future of ISP billing and OSShttps://sonar.software >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Simon Westlake >> Email: simon@sonar.software >> Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA >> --- >> Sonar Software Inc >> The future of ISP billing and OSShttps://sonar.software >> >> > > -- > Simon Westlake > Email: simon@sonar.software > Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA > --- > Sonar Software Inc > The future of ISP billing and OSShttps://sonar.software > >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
Been production for a long time now! Hit v1 last year.
On 9/25/2017 10:00 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
is sonar fully in production or alpha beta state?
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software
<mailto:simon@sonar.software>> wrote:
I'm not a hater, I'm still here.
On 9/25/2017 9:58 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
hater
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Simon Westlake
<simon@sonar.software <mailto:simon@sonar.software>> wrote:
Mmmm.. no.
On 9/25/2017 9:34 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
Simon... please, please, please come back
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Steve Jones
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used
NX216 so at least the monitoring offloads. but I have to
say, it really pisses a guy off when hardware specs are
removed, really pisses the guy off.
weve been running 750 or so through this one, but
bandwidth has increased. As best I can tell its not
heavy, like 20kpps if I'm understanding the attacked MT
correctly.
This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on
monitoring devices on the BMU, but no customer impact,
now its croaking customer latencies.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter
<ada...@amarillowireless.net
<mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net>> wrote:
I think we started having issues around 600 or 800
subs on our NX216
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller
<par...@cyberbroadband.net
<mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote:
i have heard rumor you might have problems with
a nx216 with 500 or so accounts or higher.
the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter
start being high(er) on your billing server.
we have not run into this yet and are still on a
nx216 - close to 700 customers i think.
we have been adding and removing a lot (of
customers) lately
- Original Message -
*From:* Steve Jones
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM
*Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
anybody know where the hardware details are?
I think we outgrew a bmu, but with the whole
new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary
sites I don't seem to be able to find any specs
--
Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
<tel:%28806%29%20316-5071>
C: 806.231.7180 <tel:%28806%29%20231-7180>
http://www.amarillowireless.net
<http://www.amarillowireless.net/>
<http://www.amarillowireless.net>
--
Simon Westlake
Email:simon@sonar.software <mailto:simon@sonar.software>
Phone:(702) 447-1247 <tel:%28702%29%20447-1247> US /(780) 900-1180
<tel:%28780%29%20900-1180> CA
---
Sonar Software Inc
The future of ISP billing and OSS
https://sonar.software
--
Simon Westlake
Email:simon@sonar.software <mailto:simon@sonar.software>
Phone:(702) 447-1247 <tel:%28702%29%20447-1247> US /(780) 900-1180
<tel:%28780%29%20900-1180> CA
---
Sonar Software Inc
The future of ISP billing and OSS
https://sonar.software
--
Simon Westlake
Email: simon@sonar.software
Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA
---
Sonar Software Inc
The future of ISP billing and OSS
https://sonar.software
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
is sonar fully in production or alpha beta state? On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software> wrote: > I'm not a hater, I'm still here. > > On 9/25/2017 9:58 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > > hater > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software> > wrote: > >> Mmmm.. no. >> >> On 9/25/2017 9:34 PM, Steve Jones wrote: >> >> Simon... please, please, please come back >> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at >>> least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy >>> off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. >>> >>> weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has >>> increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm >>> understanding the attacked MT correctly. >>> >>> This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring devices >>> on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer latencies. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter < >>> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote: >>> >>>> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >>>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or so >>>>> accounts or higher. >>>>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) >>>>> on your billing server. >>>>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 >>>>> customers i think. >>>>> >>>>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - Original Message - >>>>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >>>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >>>>> >>>>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu, >>>>> but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I >>>>> don't seem to be able to find any specs >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Adair Winter >>>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >>>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <%28806%29%20316-5071> >>>> C: 806.231.7180 <%28806%29%20231-7180> >>>> http://www.amarillowireless.net >>>> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Simon Westlake >> Email: simon@sonar.software >> Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA >> --- >> Sonar Software Inc >> The future of ISP billing and OSShttps://sonar.software >> >> > > -- > Simon Westlake > Email: simon@sonar.software > Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA > --- > Sonar Software Inc > The future of ISP billing and OSShttps://sonar.software > >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
I'm not a hater, I'm still here. On 9/25/2017 9:58 PM, Steve Jones wrote: hater On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software <mailto:simon@sonar.software>> wrote: Mmmm.. no. On 9/25/2017 9:34 PM, Steve Jones wrote: Simon... please, please, please come back On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote: I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm understanding the attacked MT correctly. This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring devices on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer latencies. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net <mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net>> wrote: I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net <mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote: i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or so accounts or higher. the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) on your billing server. we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 customers i think. we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately - Original Message - *From:* Steve Jones <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu, but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I don't seem to be able to find any specs -- Adair Winter VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <tel:%28806%29%20316-5071> C: 806.231.7180 <tel:%28806%29%20231-7180> http://www.amarillowireless.net <http://www.amarillowireless.net/> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> -- Simon Westlake Email:simon@sonar.software <mailto:simon@sonar.software> Phone:(702) 447-1247 <tel:%28702%29%20447-1247> US /(780) 900-1180 <tel:%28780%29%20900-1180> CA --- Sonar Software Inc The future of ISP billing and OSS https://sonar.software -- Simon Westlake Email: simon@sonar.software Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA --- Sonar Software Inc The future of ISP billing and OSS https://sonar.software
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
hater On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Simon Westlake <simon@sonar.software> wrote: > Mmmm.. no. > > On 9/25/2017 9:34 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > > Simon... please, please, please come back > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at least >> the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy off when >> hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. >> >> weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has >> increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm >> understanding the attacked MT correctly. >> >> This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring devices >> on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer latencies. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter < >> ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote: >> >>> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or so >>>> accounts or higher. >>>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) on >>>> your billing server. >>>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 >>>> customers i think. >>>> >>>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - Original Message - >>>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >>>> >>>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu, >>>> but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I >>>> don't seem to be able to find any specs >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Adair Winter >>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <%28806%29%20316-5071> >>> C: 806.231.7180 <%28806%29%20231-7180> >>> http://www.amarillowireless.net >>> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >>> >>> >>> >> > > -- > Simon Westlake > Email: simon@sonar.software > Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA > --- > Sonar Software Inc > The future of ISP billing and OSShttps://sonar.software > >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
Mmmm.. no. On 9/25/2017 9:34 PM, Steve Jones wrote: Simon... please, please, please come back On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote: I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm understanding the attacked MT correctly. This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring devices on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer latencies. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net <mailto:ada...@amarillowireless.net>> wrote: I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net <mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote: i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or so accounts or higher. the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) on your billing server. we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 customers i think. we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately - Original Message - *From:* Steve Jones <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu, but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I don't seem to be able to find any specs -- Adair Winter VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <tel:%28806%29%20316-5071> C: 806.231.7180 <tel:%28806%29%20231-7180> http://www.amarillowireless.net <http://www.amarillowireless.net/> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> -- Simon Westlake Email: simon@sonar.software Phone: (702) 447-1247 US / (780) 900-1180 CA --- Sonar Software Inc The future of ISP billing and OSS https://sonar.software
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
Simon... please, please, please come back On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:21 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at least > the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy off when > hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. > > weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has increased. > As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm understanding the > attacked MT correctly. > > This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring devices > on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer latencies. > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net > > wrote: > >> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < >> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: >> >>> >>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or so >>> accounts or higher. >>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) on >>> your billing server. >>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 >>> customers i think. >>> >>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >>> >>> >>> >>> - Original Message - >>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >>> >>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu, >>> but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I >>> don't seem to be able to find any specs >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Adair Winter >> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner >> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071> >> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180> >> http://www.amarillowireless.net >> <http://www.amarillowireless.net> >> >> >> >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at least the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy off when hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off. weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has increased. As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm understanding the attacked MT correctly. This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring devices on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer latencies. On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net> wrote: > I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 > > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < > par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: > >> >> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or so >> accounts or higher. >> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) on >> your billing server. >> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 >> customers i think. >> >> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately >> >> >> >> - Original Message - >> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs >> >> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu, >> but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I >> don't seem to be able to find any specs >> >> > > > -- > > Adair Winter > VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner > Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071> > C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180> > http://www.amarillowireless.net > <http://www.amarillowireless.net> > > >
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216 On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net > wrote: > > i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or so > accounts or higher. > the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) on > your billing server. > we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 > customers i think. > > we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately > > > > - Original Message - > *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM > *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs > > anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu, but > with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I don't > seem to be able to find any specs > > -- Adair Winter VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 C: 806.231.7180 http://www.amarillowireless.net <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
Re: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or so accounts or higher. the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) on your billing server. we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700 customers i think. we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately - Original Message - From: Steve Jones To: af@afmug.com Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM Subject: [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu, but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I don't seem to be able to find any specs
[AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu, but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I don't seem to be able to find any specs
