BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
Mangled vote below might not be clear. I vote ENDORSE ais523 on 8584. -G. On 6/21/2021 8:27 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I vote: >>> 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deferenceEndorse ais523. I >>> think limiting deference to being within-power > deference only is a security design choice not a bug - not convinced on > changing it. > >>> 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation > FOR. *thank you* for finally doing this. > >>> 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period >> AGAINST due to text collision/reversion - it would leave a procedural mess >> with duplicative text but not identical to Rule 2651. > > No change of vote for 8587, just highlighting the issue. > -G. >
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
I vote: >> 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deferenceEndorse ais523. I >> think limiting deference to being within-power deference only is a security design choice not a bug - not convinced on changing it. >> 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation FOR. *thank you* for finally doing this. >> 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period > AGAINST due to text collision/reversion - it would leave a procedural mess > with duplicative text but not identical to Rule 2651. No change of vote for 8587, just highlighting the issue. -G.
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
I vote: > 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill FOR > 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2 FOR > 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening FOR > 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility (already voted) > 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation FOR > 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2 FOR > 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2 Note a typo (missing 'a'). Seems unsignificant. FOR. > 8581& Aris1.0 Grants on Resets FOR. Increases in specialization are good > 8582& Aris2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art FOR > 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches FOR > 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference no vote yet > 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting periodFOR > 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation no vote yet > 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period AGAINST due to text collision/reversion - it would leave a procedural mess with duplicative text but not identical to Rule 2651. > 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval FOR. I agree this does not break things. > 8589& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal A PRESENT > 8590& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal B FOR > 8591& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal C AGAINST > 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal D PRESENT -G.
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On 6/20/21 9:21 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-business wrote: > On 6/15/2021 12:11 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote: >> 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility > I vote AGAINST this proposal. > > It's either a scam or bad security. In this bit: > >> 5. Non-Festive players are not eligible to object to intents to >> perform the following actions: >> >> a. Enact, amend, or repeal Emergency Regulations > we need to add to the fact that Emergency Regs can set Festivity. So if > you have control over an Emergency Reg, you can set the festivity high and > keep people out. > > I considered using festivity when doing the emergency reg scam back a few > months ago, and the fact that the PM could use some level of Agoran > Consent to change that was a big protection - so IMO it's a big > vulnerability to lock non-festival people out of changing emergency regs. > > -G. > I change my vote on that proposal to AGAINST It's not an (intentional) scam, though I think the better solution is to remove that ability from emergency regs than to let non-Festive people object to them. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On 6/15/2021 12:11 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote: > 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility I vote AGAINST this proposal. It's either a scam or bad security. In this bit: > 5. Non-Festive players are not eligible to object to intents to > perform the following actions: > > a. Enact, amend, or repeal Emergency Regulations we need to add to the fact that Emergency Regs can set Festivity. So if you have control over an Emergency Reg, you can set the festivity high and keep people out. I considered using festivity when doing the emergency reg scam back a few months ago, and the fact that the PM could use some level of Agoran Consent to change that was a big protection - so IMO it's a big vulnerability to lock non-festival people out of changing emergency regs. -G.
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
I vote as follows: 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill FOR 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2 PRESENT 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening FOR 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility FOR 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation FOR 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2 FOR 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2 FOR 8581& Aris1.0 Grants on Resets FOR 8582& Aris2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art FOR 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches FOR 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference FOR 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting period FOR 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation FOR 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period FOR 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval FOR 8589& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal A FOR (same reason I supported rulebending) 8590& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal B FOR 8591& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal C FOR 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal D FOR
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On 2021-06-18 14:22, ais523 via agora-business wrote: On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 00:20 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: On 6/17/21 3:38 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation FOR I change this vote to AGAINST, per Falsifian. I also change my vote on this proposal to AGAINST. I also change my vote on this proposal to AGAINST.
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 00:20 -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > On 6/17/21 3:38 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > > > 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation > > FOR > > > I change this vote to AGAINST, per Falsifian. I also change my vote on this proposal to AGAINST. -- ais523
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On 6/17/21 3:38 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: >> 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation > FOR > > I change this vote to AGAINST, per Falsifian. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
I vote as follows. > ID Author(s) AITitle > --- > 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill endorse Trigon > 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2 endorse Jason > 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening endorse Jason > 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility endorse Jason > 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation endorse Jason > 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2 endorse Jason > 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2 endorse Jason > 8581& Aris1.0 Grants on Resets endorse Aris > 8582& Aris2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art endorse Aris > 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches endorse Murphy > 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference endorse Murphy > 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting period endorse Murphy > 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation AGAINST. [Missing the "and" linking the conditions. Without that, I think it's most natural to interpret this as a list where *any* of the listed conditions are sufficient, which is not what we want.] > 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period endorse Murphy > 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval endorse Murphy > 8589& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal A AGAINST > 8590& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal B AGAINST > 8591& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal C AGAINST > 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal D AGAINST -- Falsifian
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 00:11 -0700, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote: > ID Author(s) AITitle > --- I vote as follows: > 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill FOR (the wording here is awkward but it's still an improvement) > 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2 FOR > 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening FOR > 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility FOR > 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation ENDORSE G. > 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2 FOR > 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2 FOR > 8581& Aris1.0 Grants on Resets AGAINST > 8582& Aris2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art PRESENT > 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches FOR > 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference AGAINST; it's easy enough to avoid introducing a contradiction, as shown in your first example, and allowing low-power rules to ever overrule high-power rules (even with their permission) makes me suspicious that something might break or be scammable, even though I can't immediately think of any examples > 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting period FOR > 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation FOR > 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period PRESENT; this gives the ADoP two different "CAN"s to perform the same action, which I think works (there's no contradiction), but it's ugly and goes against how many people think about how actions work > 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval AGAINST; as many other people pointed out, this prevents the L owning coins, and doesn't explain why > 8589& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal A AGAINST > 8590& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal B AGAINST > 8591& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal C AGAINST > 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal D AGAINST -- ais523
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
I vote as follows: > 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill FOR > 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2 FOR > 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening ENDORSE G. since while I'm relatively sure this doesn't break anything, if e thinks it's a bad idea it probably is. > 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility FOR > 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation FOR > 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2 FOR > 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2 FOR > 8581& Aris1.0 Grants on Resets PRESENT > 8582& Aris2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art ENDORSE nix > 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches FOR > 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference FOR > 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting period FOR > 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation FOR > 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period AGAINST because this reverts the election cycle changes > 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval FOR > 8589& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal A AGAINST > 8590& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal B AGAINST > 8591& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal C AGAINST > 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal D AGAINST -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
Clarifying: On 2021-06-16 14:00, Telna via agora-business wrote: 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting periodFOR I vote FOR 8585. 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal DAGAINST I vote AGAINST 8592.
Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 3:27 PM N. S. via agora-business < agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > I vote in this manner > 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill > FOR > 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2 > FOR > 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening > AGAINST, the current version already works or arguably should work and this > new version is longer and is comma gore. > 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility > FOR > 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation > AGAINST - overlong and any nonconsensual auction regs would be objected to. > 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2 > AGAINST - of course I support in principle but the wording would be very > much clearer if it were "an adoption index other than 'none'" > 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2 > FOR > 8581& Aris1.0 Grants on Resets > AGAINST > 8582& Aris2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art > FOR > 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches > FOR > 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference > Endorse Aris. (my eyes glaze over) > 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting period > FOR > 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation > Enthusiastically FOR, nice job > 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period > Endorse Aris (eyes glazed over) > 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval > FOR > 8589& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal A > FOR > 8590& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal B > FOR > 8591& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal C > FOR > 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal D > FOR > -- > From R. Lee > I change my vote to AGAINST 8588 -- >From R. Lee
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
> > > I vote in this manner 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill FOR 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2 FOR 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening AGAINST, the current version already works or arguably should work and this new version is longer and is comma gore. 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility FOR 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation AGAINST - overlong and any nonconsensual auction regs would be objected to. 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2 AGAINST - of course I support in principle but the wording would be very much clearer if it were "an adoption index other than 'none'" 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2 FOR 8581& Aris1.0 Grants on Resets AGAINST 8582& Aris2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art FOR 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches FOR 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference Endorse Aris. (my eyes glaze over) 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting period FOR 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation Enthusiastically FOR, nice job 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period Endorse Aris (eyes glazed over) 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval FOR 8589& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal A FOR 8590& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal B FOR 8591& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal C FOR 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal D FOR -- >From R. Lee
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
I vote as follows:> 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill FOR 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2 FOR 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening FOR 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility FOR 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation FOR 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2 FOR 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2 PRESENT 8581& Aris1.0 Grants on Resets AGAINST Aren't there enough cards going around at the start of the round already? I'd support this if it only awarded your grant if you'd used it already that month (and just lost it in the reset). 8582& Aris2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art PRESENT 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches FOR 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference PRESENT I feel very wary of this one. 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting periodFOR 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation FOR 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period FOR 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval AGAINST Why are we locking L out of coins? 8589& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal A AGAINST 8590& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal B AGAINST 8591& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal C AGAINST 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal DAGAINST
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
I vote FOR each of Atmunn's proposals
On Tue, Jun 15, 2021, 5:12 PM Aris Merchant via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW.
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it,
> and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote
> collector
> is the Assessor, the quorum is 7, the voting method is AI-majority, and the
> valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
> conditional votes).
>
> ID Author(s) AITitle
> ---
> 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill
> 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2
> 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening
> 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility
> 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation
> 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2
> 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2
> 8581& Aris1.0 Grants on Resets
> 8582& Aris2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art
> 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches
> 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference
> 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting period
> 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation
> 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period
> 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval
> 8589& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal A
> 8590& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal B
> 8591& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal C
> 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal D
>
> The proposal pool is currently empty.
>
> Legend: * : Democratic proposal.
> & : Ordinary proposal.
> ~ : Unsponsored proposal.
>
> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where
> the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
> the information shown above shall control.
>
> //
> ID: 8574
> Title: mending the quill
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: Trigon
> Co-author(s): Jason, Aris
>
>
> [ Comment: It is not unusual for the final draft of a proposal to be
>submitted by someone other than the person who did most of the
>drafting for that proposal. These proposals have, in several
>instances, made it to the finals. Notably, during the Silver Quill
>2020 discussions, an honorable mention was given to Interesting
>Chambers, which I wrote and did revisions on but never wrote the final
>version of. This kind of stuff has happened before. It isn't too
>worrying, but it would be nice to not have to work around it. Plus,
>proposals are cheap. ]
>
> Amend Rule 2582 by replacing:
>
> - Silver Quill, awardable by the Promotor to the author of a
> proposal of outstanding merit and influence on the game
> (additional information: ID Number of the proposal).
>
> with:
>
> - Silver Quill, awardable by the Promotor to the author of a
> proposal of outstanding merit and influence on the game, or to
> a coauthor, although e SHOULD only do so if it is generally
> agreed that that coauthor contributed more to that proposal
> than the person who submitted it (additional information: ID
> Number of the proposal).
>
> //
> ID: 8575
> Title: Stone Win Delay v2
> Adoption index: 2.0
> Author: Jason
> Co-author(s): Gaelan
>
>
> Amend Rule 2644 to read, in whole:
>
> {
>
> A player CAN, by announcement, Notice the Gauntlet, specifying a single
> player that owns 5 or more stones, provided that no person has done so
> in the past 30 days.
>
> When the Gauntlet is Noticed, the specified player wins the game. If the
> Gauntlet was Noticed 4 days ago, then all existing stones are
> transferred to Agora.
>
> }
>
>
> [Adds a delay to stone wins to bring it inline with VP wins. Also adds a
> prevention for rapid-fire stone wins. This doesn't allow the bearer of
> many stones to prevent the win, in order to maintain a balance of stone
> power.]
>
> //
> ID: 8576
> Title: "By announcement" loosening
> Adoption index:
> Author: Jason
> Co-author(s): Aris, Murphy
>
>
> Amend Rule 478 by replacing the following:
>
> {
>
> Where the rules define an action that a person CAN perform "by
> announcement", that person performs that action by unambiguously and
> clearly specifying the action and announcing that e performs it.
>
> }
>
> with the following:
>
> {
>
> Where the rules define an action that a person CAN perform "by
> announcement", that person performs that action by, in a single public
>
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
On 6/15/21 2:11 AM, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote: > PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW. > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it, > and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector > is the Assessor, the quorum is 7, the voting method is AI-majority, and the > valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are > conditional votes). > > ID Author(s) AITitle > --- > 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill I vote FOR AND ENDORSE HERALD > 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2 PRESENT > 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening ENDORSE G. > 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility PRESENT; on the reverse side this also impacts de register/lockout scams > 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation PRESENT > 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2 PRESENT > 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2 FOR > 8581& Aris1.0 Grants on Resets AGAINST; not strongly against this, but it seems to favor people involved in the takeover, or at least paying enough attention to use eir grant before the reset and get a free refill. > 8582& Aris2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art PRESENT > 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches PRESENT > 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference ENDORSE G. AND AIS523 if equal, otherwise AGAINST > 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting period PRESENT; this seems just as clunky, but in a different way > 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation PRESENT > 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period PRESENT > 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval PRESENT I do not vote on any proposal currently up for vote by ATMunn. -- nix Webmastor, Ministor, Herald
BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8574-8592
I vote as follows: On 15/06/2021 07:11, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote: 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill FOR 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2 FOR 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening ENDORSE Jason 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility FOR 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation FOR 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2 FOR 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2 FOR 8581& Aris1.0 Grants on Resets FOR 8582& Aris2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art PRESENT 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches PRESENT 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference PRESENT 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting period PRESENT 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation PRESENT until I have time to run a diff on this. 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period PRESENT 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval AGAINST as this makes the L unable to own coins, which is bad. 8589& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal A FOR 8590& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal B FOR 8591& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal C FOR 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal D FOR -- Trigon ¸¸.•*¨*• Play AGORA QUEST I’m always happy to become a party to contracts. I LOVE SPAGHETTI transfer Jason one coin nch was here I hereby don't... trust... the dragon... don't... trust... the dragon... Do not Construe Jason's message with subject TRIGON as extending this
