DIS: Test
Hello? This message contains no game actions. -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Re: DIS: Test 2
On 4/11/23 15:44, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: I scheduled them to send at the exact same time (Test 1 before Test 2) Ah interesting. My guess is that when you schedule the client sets the Date to the scheduled time, even if it doesn't actually *send* at the scheduled time. That'd explain the large timespan (it probably actually sent about a minute after the scheduled time). That might be an interesting wrinkle in any potential CFJ. -- nix Prime Minister, Herald
Re: DIS: Test 2
I scheduled them to send at the exact same time (Test 1 before Test 2) On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:40 PM nix via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 4/11/23 15:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: > > I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience > The time between your DATE and the first received on these messages > seems longer than your previous messages (or other players'). Did you > schedule these, or do something to the headers? > > -- > nix > Prime Minister, Herald > >
Re: DIS: Test 2
On 4/11/23 15:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience The time between your DATE and the first received on these messages seems longer than your previous messages (or other players'). Did you schedule these, or do something to the headers? -- nix Prime Minister, Herald
DIS: Test 2
I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience
DIS: Test 1
I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience
DIS: Test Post Please Ignore [Herald]
Just testing a filter. -- nix Herald
DIS: Test
This message contains no game actions. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
Re: DIS: Test
Jason wrote: I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare Apathy. [G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.] https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/2015/08/no-1973-1975.html
Re: DIS: Test
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:44 AM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare > Apathy. > > [G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.] > > -- > Jason Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason > > i object -- >From R. Lee
DIS: Test
I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare Apathy. [G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.] -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
DIS: test
test -- Falsifian
DIS: Test
This message contains no game actions. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
DIS: Test
This is a test message and contains no actions.
DIS: test
Test, sorry for the spam. The list was down for about 7 hours today because I messed something up while upgrading the server to be fully 64-bit. Sorry. (i386 in 2020? Absurd!)
Re: DIS: Test
On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 18:41 +, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote: > I intend, without objection, to figure out if the lists are quiet or > down. I support. -- ais523
DIS: Test
I intend, without objection, to figure out if the lists are quiet or down. Gaelan
DIS: test
I intend, without objection, to determine whether the list is working again.
DIS: Test
This is only a test. This message contains no game actions. -- Jason Cobb
DIS: Test
This message contains no game actions. This just a test to see if the fora are working properly again. -Aris
DIS: Test
No doubt this message will spur a flurry of suspicion and precautionary objections, but after being stuck with a temporary email client for a month, my main email client has started working for receiving Agoran email again. I'm therefore hoping that it will also be currently capable of sending, in which case I may be able to use my main email client for both sending and receiving Agoran email for the first time in years, and this is the message I'm using to test that. -- ais523
DIS: Test (double spacing)
=Metareport= This is the ADoP’s weekly report Date of last report: 2020-06-21 Date of this report: 2020-06-28 MISCELLANEOUS INFO -- Filled offices: 15/15 (100%) Total officers: 10 Consolidation[1]: 1.5 Late reports: 0% -- [1] This is the number of filled offices divided by the number of officers. Each officer, on average, holds this many offices. OFFICES Office Holder Since Last Election -- ADoP R. Lee 2020-06-072020-06-27 ArbitorG. 2019-06-112019-11-23 Assessor Jason 2019-07-092019-11-11 Distributoromd2018-06-15imposed Herald PSS2020-05-032020-05-16 Notary ATMunn 2020-06-152020-06-15 Prime Minister nch2020-06-222020-06-22 Promotor Aris 2016-10-212017-09-21 RefereePSS2020-03-292020-04-19 Registrar Falsifian 2019-05-042020-02-26 Rulekeepor Jason 2019-12-062020-03-07 SpeakerG. 2020-06-15imposed Tailor PSS2020-04-192020-04-19 Treasuror Trigon 2020-05-012020-05-01 Webmastor nch2020-06-032020-06-13 -- * = Interim office (vacant or holder not elected) WEEKLY REPORTS Office Report Last Published Late[1] -- ADoP Offices 2020-06-21[2] ArbitorJudicial matters 2020-06-20 Herald Matters of Honour2020-06-28 Notary Contracts2020-06-22 Promotor Proposal pool2020-06-21 RefereeRule violations 2020-06-28 Registrar Players, Fora2020-06-22 Rulekeepor Short Logical Ruleset2020-06-18 Treasuror Coins, other currencies 2020-06-28 Tailor Glitter Prices 2020-06-28 -- [1] ! = 1 period missed, !! = 2, !!! = 3+ [2] Not including this report MONTHLY REPORTS Office ReportLast Published Late -- Herald Patent titles 2020-05-31 Registrar Player history2020-06-16 Rulekeepor Full Logical Ruleset 2020-05-24 Tailor Ribbons 2020-05-31 Webmastor Web resources 2020-06-03 -- STARTABLE ELECTIONS[1] Office Last Election -- Promotor 2017-09-21 Assessor 2019-11-11 Arbitor 2019-11-23 Registrar2020-02-26 Rulekeepor 2020-03-07 -- [1] Anyone can start an election (with 2 support and also becoming a candidate) 90 days after the previous one (or if it's interim and no election is ongoing). This section lists the offices for which anyone could start an election this way. INTERESTS - Office Interest --ADoP Efficiency ArbitorJustice Assessor Efficiency, Legislation DistributorParticipation Herald Participation Notary Economy Prime Minister Every Ministry Promotor Legislation RefereeJustice Registrar Efficiency Rulekeepor Legislation, Participation SpeakerEvery Ministry Tailor Participation Treasuror Economy, Economy Webmastor Participation -- Recent Events - Jun 07: R. Lee pays rewards for previous officer duties. Jun 07: R. Lee initiates elections for ADoP and Webmastor Jun 07: Notary election enters voting phase. Jun 07: PSS publishes Herald weekly report Jun 07: PSS publishes Referee weekly report Jun 07: G. publishes Arbitor weekly report. BEGINNING OF NEW WEEK Jun 10: Aris publishes Promotor weekly report Jun 11: Prime Minister election enters voting phase Jun 11: Falsifian publishes Registrar weekly report Jun 11: Trigon publishes Treasuror weekly report Jun 12: Jason, the Assessor, resolves proposals Jun 13: Jason, the Rulekeepor, publishes Short Logical Ruleset Jun 13: R. Lee declared winner of ADoP election as only candidate Jun 13:
DIS: Test Post, Please Ignore
Playing around with KMail and the protonmail bridge. --- Nch
DIS: Test
1... 2... 3... testing. -Aris
Re: DIS: test
On 2/14/20 2:26 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: > On 2/14/20 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: >> Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if >> it's only for that message. >> >> -- Jason Cobb > > Looks like it is, since I got this back (w/o failure notice). > Oh, just figured out the cause of the error - I had typoed "discussion". Sorry for the spam. -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: test
On 2/14/20 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if > it's only for that message. > > -- Jason Cobb Looks like it is, since I got this back (w/o failure notice). -- Jason Cobb
DIS: test
Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if it's only for that message. -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: test
On 2/2/20 9:15 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote: > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote: >> Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone. > ...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the > wrong address. This time for real. Received, if it helps. -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: test
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote: > Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone. ...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the wrong address. This time for real.
Re: DIS: test
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 5:11 PM comexk--- via agora-discussion wrote: > Nothing to see here, move along. Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone.
DIS: test
Nothing to see here, move along.
DIS: test 2
my filters work differently if the subject is munged with "DIS" etc. this is testing that part of the filter.
Re: DIS: test
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019, omd wrote: Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? Maybe this is a good time to remind you (you never responded to my original message) that back in June/July (I think) I had trouble receiving list email because the list IP got on a global spam blacklist that my own mail account's mail server subscribes to, which AFAIU normally happens because such an IP sends mail to a spam trap address. I eventually solved this personally by asking one of my sysadmins. He added an explicit exception for the IP. This might indicate that occasionally that IP _is_ being used for genuine spam (maybe it's a shared address (there's no reverse DNS), or maybe there's an actual vulnerability), and if gmail is also picking up on this it's no wonder if it starts dropping stuff. Paranoid greetings, Ørjan.
Re: DIS: test should fail
Never mind; I eventually got "Yeah ... I was trying" at 03:59 UTC. On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:52, James Cook wrote: > > I got "Testing my new address filter." but not "Yeah... I was trying > to send from an unsubscribed address, ...". > > > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:49, Jason Cobb wrote: > > > > On 12/22/19 10:35 PM, Nicholas Allegra wrote: > > > > I received this, but not Falsifian's reply nor the one that says > > "Testing my new address filter." > > > > -- > > Jason Cobb > > > > > -- > - Falsifian -- - Falsifian
Re: DIS: test should fail
I got "Testing my new address filter." but not "Yeah... I was trying to send from an unsubscribed address, ...". On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:49, Jason Cobb wrote: > > On 12/22/19 10:35 PM, Nicholas Allegra wrote: > > I received this, but not Falsifian's reply nor the one that says > "Testing my new address filter." > > -- > Jason Cobb > -- - Falsifian
Re: DIS: test
On 12/22/19 10:34 PM, omd wrote: Testing my new address filter. On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 3:25 PM omd wrote: Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? Sorry, just received this; disregard my previous message. -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: test should fail
On 12/22/19 10:35 PM, Nicholas Allegra wrote: I received this, but not Falsifian's reply nor the one that says "Testing my new address filter." -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: test should fail
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 7:37 PM James Cook wrote: > I got this one. Yeah... I was trying to send from an unsubscribed address, but I didn't realize that when sending from an alias, Gmail would keep my normal address in the envelope. Whoops.
Re: DIS: test should fail
I got this one. On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:36, Nicholas Allegra wrote: > > -- - Falsifian
DIS: test should fail
Re: DIS: test
Testing my new address filter. On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 3:25 PM omd wrote: > > Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP?
Re: DIS: test
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 at 23:25, Jason Cobb wrote: > On 12/22/19 6:24 PM, omd wrote: > > Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? > > Received. > > -- > Jason Cobb I got both these messages, but GMail attached the note "This message was not sent to Spam because of a filter you created." to omd's. -- - Falsifian
Re: DIS: test
On 12/22/19 6:24 PM, omd wrote: Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? Received. -- Jason Cobb
DIS: test
Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP?
Re: DIS: Test of a-d
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 10:58 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote: > This is a test of what happens if I don't add "DIS:" to the subject > line ahead of time. I received this (and the a-b and a-o versions too). The mailing list rewrote the "From:" line in order to prevent a DMARC mismatch. -- ais523
DIS: Test of a-d
This is a test of what happens if I don't add "DIS:" to the subject line ahead of time.
DIS: test
test Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
DIS: test post the third
third time's the charm (or not)
Re: DIS: test post
Actually I was testing if my new email was subscribed correctly (yes, obviously), and if my filters put the returning message in the right place (no they didn't, but I'll try to minimize tests to fix that). On 12/28/2018 8:42 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: I received this, if that's what you were trying to test. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, December 28, 2018 4:24 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: testing new email filters
Re: DIS: test post
I received this, if that's what you were trying to test. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, December 28, 2018 4:24 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > testing new email filters
DIS: test post
testing new email filters
Re: DIS: Test (not a report)
I messed around with some settings and now it is working properly. On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:56 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing > characters actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the > rest of you? > > -twg > > ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │ATMunn │ 6│ 37│ 2│ 0│ 7│ 0│ 79│ 16│ 0│ 15│ > │Aris │ 5│ 35│ 11│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 117│ 17│ 0│ 14│ > │Corona │ 31│ 92│ 48│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 170│ 31│ 233│ 16│ > │CuddleBeam │ 11│ 23│ 9│ 4│ 8│ 9│ 60│ 12│ 0│ 14│ > │G. │ 42│ 91│ 23│ 0│ 6│ 3│ 613│ 33│ 68│ 36│ > │Murphy │ 0│ 27│ 6│ 0│ 3│ 0│ 76│ 13│ 0│ 14│ > │omd │ 0│ 5│ 1│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 15│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Pub. Scrib. Schol. │ 5│ 20│ 0│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 28│ 7│ 0│ 9│ > │Trigon │ 2│ 14│ 17│ 4│ 0│ 0│ 49│ 9│ 0│ 14│ > │twg │ 31│ 84│ 4│ 0│ 35│ 3│ 393│ 17│ 0│ 25│ > │V.J. Rada│ 10│ 75│ 3│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 105│ 24│ 0│ 28│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Gaelan │ 14│ 33│ 2│ 6│ 2│ 0│ 57│ 12│ 0│ 14│ > │Kenyon │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ > │nichdel │ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ > │o│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Ouri │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ > │pokes│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Quazie │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Telnaior │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │天火狐│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > └─┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┘ >
Re: DIS: Test (not a report)
needs an explicit declaration of monospace typestyle: [image: needs monospace.PNG] Here it is in monospace, gmail's "fixed width" option: > ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │ATMunn │ 6│ 37│ 2│ 0│ 7│ 0│ 79│ 16│ 0│ 15│ > │Aris │ 5│ 35│ 11│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 117│ 17│ 0│ 14│ > │Corona │ 31│ 92│ 48│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 170│ 31│ 233│ 16│ > │CuddleBeam │ 11│ 23│ 9│ 4│ 8│ 9│ 60│ 12│ 0│ 14│ > │G. │ 42│ 91│ 23│ 0│ 6│ 3│ 613│ 33│ 68│ 36│ > │Murphy │ 0│ 27│ 6│ 0│ 3│ 0│ 76│ 13│ 0│ 14│ > │omd │ 0│ 5│ 1│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 15│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Pub. Scrib. Schol. │ 5│ 20│ 0│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 28│ 7│ 0│ 9│ > │Trigon │ 2│ 14│ 17│ 4│ 0│ 0│ 49│ 9│ 0│ 14│ > │twg │ 31│ 84│ 4│ 0│ 35│ 3│ 393│ 17│ 0│ 25│ > │V.J. Rada│ 10│ 75│ 3│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 105│ 24│ 0│ 28│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Gaelan │ 14│ 33│ 2│ 6│ 2│ 0│ 57│ 12│ 0│ 14│ > │Kenyon │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ > │nichdel │ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ > │o│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Ouri │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ > │pokes│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Quazie │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Telnaior │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │天火狐│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > └─┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┘ > > -- "At this point, given the limited available data, certainty about only a very small number of things can be achieved." -- Plato, and others
Re: DIS: Test (not a report)
Looks sharp/nice/correct to me. With the usual exception of that Japanese line (but it's less out-of-line then other reports have been). On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing > characters > actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the rest of you? > > -twg > > ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │ATMunn │ 6│ 37│ 2│ 0│ 7│ 0│ 79│ 16│ 0│ 15│ > │Aris │ 5│ 35│ 11│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 117│ 17│ 0│ 14│ > │Corona │ 31│ 92│ 48│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 170│ 31│ 233│ 16│ > │CuddleBeam │ 11│ 23│ 9│ 4│ 8│ 9│ 60│ 12│ 0│ 14│ > │G. │ 42│ 91│ 23│ 0│ 6│ 3│ 613│ 33│ 68│ 36│ > │Murphy │ 0│ 27│ 6│ 0│ 3│ 0│ 76│ 13│ 0│ 14│ > │omd │ 0│ 5│ 1│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 15│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Pub. Scrib. Schol. │ 5│ 20│ 0│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 28│ 7│ 0│ 9│ > │Trigon │ 2│ 14│ 17│ 4│ 0│ 0│ 49│ 9│ 0│ 14│ > │twg │ 31│ 84│ 4│ 0│ 35│ 3│ 393│ 17│ 0│ 25│ > │V.J. Rada│ 10│ 75│ 3│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 105│ 24│ 0│ 28│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Gaelan │ 14│ 33│ 2│ 6│ 2│ 0│ 57│ 12│ 0│ 14│ > │Kenyon │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ > │nichdel │ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ > │o│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Ouri │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ > │pokes│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Quazie │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Telnaior │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │天火狐│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > └─┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┘ > >
Re: DIS: Test (not a report)
Hmm. Perhaps an experiment to shelve for the time being. 樂 -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On July 16, 2018 3:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > > =E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=90 > > =E2=94=82Entity =E2=94=82Ston=E2=94=82Appl=E2=94=82Corn=E2=94= > > =82 Ore=E2=94=82Lmbr=E2=94=82Cotn=E2=94=82Coin=E2=94=82Papr=E2=94=82Fabr=E2= > > =94=82Incs=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=A4 > > =E2=94=82ATMunn =E2=94=82 6=E2=94=82 37=E2=94=82 2=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 7=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 79=E2=94=82 16=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 15=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82Aris =E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 35=E2=94=82 11=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 117=E2=94=82 17=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 14=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82Corona =E2=94=82 31=E2=94=82 92=E2=94=82 48=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 10=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 170=E2=94=82 31=E2=94=82 233=E2= > > =94=82 16=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82CuddleBeam =E2=94=82 11=E2=94=82 23=E2=94=82 9=E2=94= > > =82 4=E2=94=82 8=E2=94=82 9=E2=94=82 60=E2=94=82 12=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 14=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82G. =E2=94=82 42=E2=94=82 91=E2=94=82 23=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 6=E2=94=82 3=E2=94=82 613=E2=94=82 33=E2=94=82 68=E2= > > =94=82 36=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82Murphy =E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 27=E2=94=82 6=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 3=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 76=E2=94=82 13=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 14=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82omd =E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 1=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 15=E2=94=82 2=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 3=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82Pub. Scrib. Schol. =E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 20=E2=94=82 0=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 28=E2=94=82 7=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 9=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82Trigon =E2=94=82 2=E2=94=82 14=E2=94=82 17=E2=94= > > =82 4=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 49=E2=94=82 9=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 14=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82twg =E2=94=82 31=E2=94=82 84=E2=94=82 4=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 35=E2=94=82 3=E2=94=82 393=E2=94=82 17=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 25=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82V.J. Rada =E2=94=82 10=E2=94=82 75=E2=94=82 3=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 10=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 105=E2=94=82 24=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 28=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=A4 > > =E2=94=82Entity =E2=94=82Ston=E2=94=82Appl=E2=94=82Corn=E2=94= > > =82 Ore=E2=94=82Lmbr=E2=94=82Cotn=E2=94=82Coin=E2=94=82Papr=E2=94=82Fabr=E2= > > =94=82Incs=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > >
Re: DIS: Test (not a report)
=E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=90 =E2=94=82Entity =E2=94=82Ston=E2=94=82Appl=E2=94=82Corn=E2=94= =82 Ore=E2=94=82Lmbr=E2=94=82Cotn=E2=94=82Coin=E2=94=82Papr=E2=94=82Fabr=E2= =94=82Incs=E2=94=82 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=A4 =E2=94=82ATMunn =E2=94=82 6=E2=94=82 37=E2=94=82 2=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 7=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 79=E2=94=82 16=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 15=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82Aris =E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 35=E2=94=82 11=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 117=E2=94=82 17=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 14=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82Corona =E2=94=82 31=E2=94=82 92=E2=94=82 48=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 10=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 170=E2=94=82 31=E2=94=82 233=E2= =94=82 16=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82CuddleBeam =E2=94=82 11=E2=94=82 23=E2=94=82 9=E2=94= =82 4=E2=94=82 8=E2=94=82 9=E2=94=82 60=E2=94=82 12=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 14=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82G. =E2=94=82 42=E2=94=82 91=E2=94=82 23=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 6=E2=94=82 3=E2=94=82 613=E2=94=82 33=E2=94=82 68=E2= =94=82 36=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82Murphy =E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 27=E2=94=82 6=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 3=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 76=E2=94=82 13=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 14=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82omd =E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 1=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 15=E2=94=82 2=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 3=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82Pub. Scrib. Schol. =E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 20=E2=94=82 0=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 28=E2=94=82 7=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 9=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82Trigon =E2=94=82 2=E2=94=82 14=E2=94=82 17=E2=94= =82 4=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 49=E2=94=82 9=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 14=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82twg =E2=94=82 31=E2=94=82 84=E2=94=82 4=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 35=E2=94=82 3=E2=94=82 393=E2=94=82 17=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 25=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82V.J. Rada=E2=94=82 10=E2=94=82 75=E2=94=82 3=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 10=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 105=E2=94=82 24=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 28=E2=94=82 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=A4 =E2=94=82Entity =E2=94=82Ston=E2=94=82Appl=E2=94=82Corn=E2=94= =82 Ore=E2=94=82Lmbr=E2=94=82Cotn=E2=94=82Coin=E2=94=82Papr=E2=94=82Fabr=E2= =94=82Incs=E2=94=82 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=A4 =E2=94=82Gaelan =E2=94=82
DIS: Test (not a report)
I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing characters actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the rest of you? -twg ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐ │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ │ATMunn │ 6│ 37│ 2│ 0│ 7│ 0│ 79│ 16│ 0│ 15│ │Aris │ 5│ 35│ 11│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 117│ 17│ 0│ 14│ │Corona │ 31│ 92│ 48│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 170│ 31│ 233│ 16│ │CuddleBeam │ 11│ 23│ 9│ 4│ 8│ 9│ 60│ 12│ 0│ 14│ │G. │ 42│ 91│ 23│ 0│ 6│ 3│ 613│ 33│ 68│ 36│ │Murphy │ 0│ 27│ 6│ 0│ 3│ 0│ 76│ 13│ 0│ 14│ │omd │ 0│ 5│ 1│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 15│ 2│ 0│ 3│ │Pub. Scrib. Schol. │ 5│ 20│ 0│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 28│ 7│ 0│ 9│ │Trigon │ 2│ 14│ 17│ 4│ 0│ 0│ 49│ 9│ 0│ 14│ │twg │ 31│ 84│ 4│ 0│ 35│ 3│ 393│ 17│ 0│ 25│ │V.J. Rada│ 10│ 75│ 3│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 105│ 24│ 0│ 28│ ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ │Gaelan │ 14│ 33│ 2│ 6│ 2│ 0│ 57│ 12│ 0│ 14│ │Kenyon │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ │nichdel │ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ │o│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ │Ouri │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ │pokes│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ │Quazie │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ │Telnaior │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ │天火狐│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ └─┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┘
DIS: Test
Testing server. -Aris
Re: DIS: Test
*HTML preformatted style, perhaps?* *+---++++---+++++++ * *|Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| * *+---++++---+++++++ * *|ATMunn | 10| 35| 0| 0| 10| 0| 39| 10| 0| 5| * *|Aris | 5| 25| 7| 0| 5| 0| 77| 5| 0| 5| * *|Corona | 24| 40| 21| 17| 9| 18| 89| 16| 0| 5| * *|CuddleBeam | 11| 13| 9| 4| 8| 9| 40| 8| 0| 5| * *|G. | 20| 90| 11| 0| 20| 0| 140| 29| 0| 5| * *|Gaelan | 14| 23| 2| 6| 2| 0| 37| 8| 0| 5| * *|Kenyon | 14| 32| 4| 6| 20| 3| 35| 7| 0| 5| * *|Murphy | 5| 25| 4| 0| 8| 0| 60| 9| 0| 5| * *|Publius Scribonius Scholasticus| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| 0| 0| * *|Quazie | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|Telnaior | 5| 25| 3| 0| 5| 0| 55| 9| 0| 0| * *|Trigon | 3| 20| 11| 2| 4| 12| 28| 6| 0| 5| * *|VJ Rada| 10| 45| 1| 0| 10| 0| 55| 15| 0| 5| * *|nichdel| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| 0| 0| * *|o | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|omd| 0| 10| 0| 0| 0| 0| 20| 4| 0| 0| * *|Ouri | 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 14| 2| 0| 5| * *|pokes | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|天火狐 | 5| 25| 0| 0| 5| 0| 40| 9| 0| 5| * *+---++++---+++++++ * *|farm at 1,-1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|mine at -1,-1 | 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|mine at 1,1| 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|orchard at -1,1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|(Corona’s) mine at 0,2 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|(Corona’s) refinery at 1,-2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|(Corona’s) orchard at 2,1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|Finger Pointing Workaround | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| * *|Agora | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 174| 0| 0| 0| * *+---++++---+++++++* +---++++---+++++++ |Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| +---++++---+++++++ |ATMunn | 10| 35| 0| 0| 10| 0| 39| 10| 0| 5| |Aris | 5| 25| 7| 0| 5| 0| 77| 5| 0| 5| |Corona | 24| 40| 21| 17| 9| 18| 89| 16| 0| 5| |CuddleBeam | 11| 13| 9| 4| 8| 9| 40| 8| 0| 5| |G. | 20| 90| 11| 0| 20| 0| 140| 29| 0| 5| |Gaelan | 14| 23| 2| 6| 2| 0| 37| 8| 0| 5| |Kenyon | 14| 32| 4| 6| 20| 3| 35| 7| 0| 5| |Murphy | 5| 25| 4| 0| 8| 0| 60| 9| 0| 5| |Publius Scribonius Scholasticus| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| 0| 0| |Quazie | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |Telnaior | 5| 25| 3| 0| 5| 0| 55| 9| 0| 0| |Trigon | 3| 20| 11| 2| 4| 12| 28| 6| 0| 5| |VJ Rada| 10| 45| 1| 0| 10| 0| 55| 15| 0| 5| |nichdel| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| 0| 0| |o | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |omd| 0| 10| 0| 0| 0| 0| 20| 4| 0| 0| |Ouri | 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 14| 2| 0| 5| |pokes | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |天火狐 | 5| 25| 0| 0| 5| 0| 40| 9| 0| 5| +---++++---+++++++ |farm at 1,-1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |mine at -1,-1 | 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |mine at 1,1| 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |orchard at -1,1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |(Corona’s) mine at 0,2 |
Re: DIS: Test
Why... How do you all make the tables??? (Let me try reposting Gaelan's previous report) +---++++---++++++ |*Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr| *+---++++---++++++ |*ATMunn | 5| 15| 0| 0| 5| 0| 20| 3| 0| *|*Aris | 5| 20| 4| 0| 5| 0| 50| 7| 0| *|*Corona | 11| 14| 2| 4| 5| 0| 45| 6| 0| *|*CuddleBeam | 11| 8| 9| 4| 8| 9| 30| 6| 0| *|*G. | 5| 20| 5| 0| 5| 0| 55| 6| 0| *|*Gaelan | 5| 20| 1| 0| 2| 0| 35| 6| 0| *|*Kenyon | 14| 21| 3| 6| 14| 3| 30| 7| 0| *|*Murphy | 5| 20| 4| 0| 8| 0| 50| 7| 0| *|*Publius Scribonius Scholasticus| 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*Quazie | 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*Telnaior | 5| 20| 2| 0| 5| 0| 40| 7| 0| *|*Trigon | 5| 20| 1| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*VJ Rada| 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*nichdel| 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*o | 5| 20| 2| 0| 5| 0| 40| 7| 0| *|*omd| 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*pokes | 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*天火狐 | 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*farm at 1,-1 | 0| 0| 6| 0| 0| 6| 0| 0| 0| *|*mine at -1,-1 | 9| 0| 0| 6| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| *|*mine at 1,1| 6| 0| 0| 4| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| *|*orchard at -1,1| 0| 6| 0| 0| 6| 0| 0| 0| 0| *+---++++---++++++ ~Corona On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:14 PM, Coronawrote: > Testing the tables > > > +---++++---++--- > -+++++ > |Entity > |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| > +---++++---++--- > -+++++ > |ATMunn | 10| 35| 0| 0| 10| 0| 39| 10| > 0| 5| > |Aris | 5| 25| 7| 0| 5| 0| 77| 5| > 0| 5| > |Corona | 24| 40| 21| 17| 9| 18| 89| 16| > 0| 5| > |CuddleBeam | 11| 13| 9| 4| 8| 9| 40| 8| > 0| 5| > |G. | 20| 90| 11| 0| 20| 0| 140| 29| > 0| 5| > |Gaelan | 14| 23| 2| 6| 2| 0| 37| 8| > 0| 5| > |Kenyon | 14| 32| 4| 6| 20| 3| 35| 7| > 0| 5| > |Murphy | 5| 25| 4| 0| 8| 0| 60| 9| > 0| 5| > |Publius Scribonius Scholasticus| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| > 0| 0| > |Quazie | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |Telnaior | 5| 25| 3| 0| 5| 0| 55| 9| > 0| 0| > |Trigon | 3| 20| 11| 2| 4| 12| 28| 6| > 0| 5| > |VJ Rada| 10| 45| 1| 0| 10| 0| 55| 15| > 0| 5| > |nichdel| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| > 0| 0| > |o | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |omd| 0| 10| 0| 0| 0| 0| 20| 4| > 0| 0| > |Ouri | 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 14| 2| > 0| 5| > |pokes | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |天火狐 | 5| 25| 0| 0| 5| 0| 40| 9| 0| > 5| > +---++++---++--- > -+++++ > |farm at 1,-1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |mine at -1,-1 | 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |mine at 1,1| 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |orchard at -1,1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |(Corona’s) mine at 0,2 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |(Corona’s) refinery at 1,-2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |(Corona’s) orchard at 2,1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |Finger Pointing Workaround | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| > 0| 0| > |Agora | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 174| 0| > 0| 0| >
DIS: Test
Testing the tables +---++++---+++++++ |Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| +---++++---+++++++ |ATMunn | 10| 35| 0| 0| 10| 0| 39| 10| 0| 5| |Aris | 5| 25| 7| 0| 5| 0| 77| 5| 0| 5| |Corona | 24| 40| 21| 17| 9| 18| 89| 16| 0| 5| |CuddleBeam | 11| 13| 9| 4| 8| 9| 40| 8| 0| 5| |G. | 20| 90| 11| 0| 20| 0| 140| 29| 0| 5| |Gaelan | 14| 23| 2| 6| 2| 0| 37| 8| 0| 5| |Kenyon | 14| 32| 4| 6| 20| 3| 35| 7| 0| 5| |Murphy | 5| 25| 4| 0| 8| 0| 60| 9| 0| 5| |Publius Scribonius Scholasticus| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| 0| 0| |Quazie | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |Telnaior | 5| 25| 3| 0| 5| 0| 55| 9| 0| 0| |Trigon | 3| 20| 11| 2| 4| 12| 28| 6| 0| 5| |VJ Rada| 10| 45| 1| 0| 10| 0| 55| 15| 0| 5| |nichdel| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| 0| 0| |o | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |omd| 0| 10| 0| 0| 0| 0| 20| 4| 0| 0| |Ouri | 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 14| 2| 0| 5| |pokes | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |天火狐 | 5| 25| 0| 0| 5| 0| 40| 9| 0| 5| +---++++---+++++++ |farm at 1,-1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |mine at -1,-1 | 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |mine at 1,1| 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |orchard at -1,1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |(Corona’s) mine at 0,2 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |(Corona’s) refinery at 1,-2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |(Corona’s) orchard at 2,1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |Finger Pointing Workaround | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| |Agora | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 174| 0| 0| 0| +---++++---+++++++ +---++++---+++++++ |Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| +---++++---+++++++ |ATMunn | 10| 35| 0| 0| 10| 0| 39| 10| 0| 5| |Aris | 5| 25| 7| 0| 5| 0| 77| 5| 0| 5| |Corona | 24| 40| 21| 17| 9| 18| 89| 16| 0| 5| |CuddleBeam | 11| 13| 9| 4| 8| 9| 40| 8| 0| 5| |G. | 20| 90| 11| 0| 20| 0| 140| 29| 0| 5| |Gaelan | 14| 23| 2| 6| 2| 0| 37| 8| 0| 5| |Kenyon | 14| 32| 4| 6| 20| 3| 35| 7| 0| 5| |Murphy | 5| 25| 4| 0| 8| 0| 60| 9| 0| 5| |Publius Scribonius Scholasticus| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| 0| 0| |Quazie | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |Telnaior | 5| 25| 3| 0| 5| 0| 55| 9| 0| 0| |Trigon | 3| 20| 11| 2| 4| 12| 28| 6| 0| 5| |VJ Rada| 10| 45| 1| 0| 10| 0| 55| 15| 0| 5| |nichdel| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| 0| 0| |o | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |omd| 0| 10| 0| 0| 0| 0| 20| 4| 0| 0| |Ouri | 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 14| 2| 0| 5| |pokes | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |天火狐 | 5| 25| 0| 0| 5| 0| 40| 9| 0| 5| +---++++---+++++++ |farm at 1,-1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |mine at -1,-1 | 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |mine at 1,1| 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |orchard at -1,1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |(Corona’s) mine at 0,2 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |(Corona’s) refinery at 1,-2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0|
Re: DIS: test message please ignore
My nickname: dragging Agora to like 1992 in terms of internationalization of its encoding. 天火狐 On 22 November 2017 at 19:59, ATMunnwrote: > Yeah, I've noticed this as well, it happens in my text editor as well. I > tend to go with the approach of having the | be in the same column. > > > On 11/22/2017 7:56 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > >> On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: >> >>> Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | >>> >>> Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | >>> >>> Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | >>> >> According to the Unicode standards, the vast majority of Japanese >> characters (whichever alphabet they come from) are intended to be twice >> as wide as an English letter would be in a monospace font. >> >> However, many email clients suck at enforcing this rule in practice >> (e.g. mine seems to be displaying the above three-character word as >> just over five columns wide). In order to avoid making peoples' eyes >> bleed, I tend to use a footnote whenever I have to write 天火狐's name in >> tabular data, so that it doesn't need to line up with anything else. >> >>
Re: DIS: test message please ignore
Yeah, I've noticed this as well, it happens in my text editor as well. I tend to go with the approach of having the | be in the same column. On 11/22/2017 7:56 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | According to the Unicode standards, the vast majority of Japanese characters (whichever alphabet they come from) are intended to be twice as wide as an English letter would be in a monospace font. However, many email clients suck at enforcing this rule in practice (e.g. mine seems to be displaying the above three-character word as just over five columns wide). In order to avoid making peoples' eyes bleed, I tend to use a footnote whenever I have to write 天火狐's name in tabular data, so that it doesn't need to line up with anything else.
Re: DIS: test message please ignore
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 19:57 Alex Smithwrote: > On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: > > > Telnaior| > > > 天火狐 | > > > Trigon | > > > > > Telnaior| > > > 天火狐 | > > > Trigon | > > > > > Telnaior| > > > 天火狐 | > > > Trigon | > > According to the Unicode standards, the vast majority of Japanese > characters (whichever alphabet they come from) are intended to be twice > as wide as an English letter would be in a monospace font. > > However, many email clients suck at enforcing this rule in practice > (e.g. mine seems to be displaying the above three-character word as > just over five columns wide). In order to avoid making peoples' eyes > bleed, I tend to use a footnote whenever I have to write 天火狐's name in > tabular data, so that it doesn't need to line up with anything else. > Yeah, I noticed that too. I do my Tailor reports in a text editor, which handles them correctly. Not sure about Rulekeepor; word-wrapping there is done by a library which I'd have to look up how it actually handles it. My guess is that it treats them as width-1, so it occasionally goes over.
Re: DIS: test message please ignore
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: > > Telnaior| > > 天火狐 | > > Trigon | > > > Telnaior| > > 天火狐 | > > Trigon | > > > Telnaior| > > 天火狐 | > > Trigon | According to the Unicode standards, the vast majority of Japanese characters (whichever alphabet they come from) are intended to be twice as wide as an English letter would be in a monospace font. However, many email clients suck at enforcing this rule in practice (e.g. mine seems to be displaying the above three-character word as just over five columns wide). In order to avoid making peoples' eyes bleed, I tend to use a footnote whenever I have to write 天火狐's name in tabular data, so that it doesn't need to line up with anything else. -- ais523
DIS: test message please ignore
| Telnaior | | 天火狐 | | Trigon | | Telnaior | | 天火狐 | | Trigon | | Telnaior | | 天火狐 | | Trigon |
Re: DIS: Test
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smithwrote: > > Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam? > > It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with > respect to sending. If this message gets through, presumably others > will too. I did not receive this. (I kid. It came through fine.) -o signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: DIS: Test
me too. On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticuswrote: > I received this. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >> On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith wrote: >> >> Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam? >> >> It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with >> respect to sending. If this message gets through, presumably others >> will too. >> >> -- >> ais523 > -- >From V.J. Rada
Re: DIS: Test
I received this. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smithwrote: > > Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam? > > It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with > respect to sending. If this message gets through, presumably others > will too. > > -- > ais523 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
DIS: Test
Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam? It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with respect to sending. If this message gets through, presumably others will too. -- ais523
Re: DIS: test
Yeah, that was the thing I wanted to try to exploit. Unfortunately SLR and other stuff are not self-ratifying like other reports. On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 at 09:39, Owen Jacobsonwrote: > > > On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > > > This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given > that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. > > > > Gaelan > > The “Estate Auctions” rule is missing a paragraph, I believe. > > -o > >
Re: DIS: test
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Gaelan Steelewrote: > > This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that > your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. > > Gaelan The “Estate Auctions” rule is missing a paragraph, I believe. -o signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: DIS: test
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Kerim Aydinwrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > test > > This concludes our test of the emergency scam response system. > > Had this been an actual working scam, it probably wouldn't have > involved CuddleBeam I refer the interested students to the list of Scamsters. OscarMeyr
Re: DIS: test
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > test This concludes our test of the emergency scam response system. Had this been an actual working scam, it probably wouldn't have involved CuddleBeam.
Re: DIS: test
Auctions became unregulated. It was just "an auction" and such. Presumably I could just make my own. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Ørjan Johansenwrote: > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given >> that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. >> > > The last paragraph of rule 2491 is duplicated. I don't see how that allows > any scam though... > > Greetings, > Ørjan.
Re: DIS: test
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. The last paragraph of rule 2491 is duplicated. I don't see how that allows any scam though... Greetings, Ørjan.
Re: DIS: test
This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. Gaelan > On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Cuddle Beamwrote: > > I don't have any email problems fortunately. I was trying to pull a scam > which relied on timing and I wanted to see what time appeared on the archives > for my message to compare with a-o. > > Sorry for any concerns. > > Also, my scam didn't work because the SLR isn't self-ratifying and now I cry > in a corner lol > >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> wrote: >> The implication that Cuddlebeam sending this email suggested e might be >> having email problems. >> >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: >> > >> > I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I could >> > spot anything funny in the headers but I didn't), what's wrong with it? >> > >> > Greetings, >> > Ørjan. >> > >> > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> > >> >> I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am >> >> slightly concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own. >> >> >> >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: >> >>> >> >>> test >> >> >> >
Re: DIS: test
I don't have any email problems fortunately. I was trying to pull a scam which relied on timing and I wanted to see what time appeared on the archives for my message to compare with a-o. Sorry for any concerns. Also, my scam didn't work because the SLR isn't self-ratifying and now I cry in a corner lol On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > The implication that Cuddlebeam sending this email suggested e might be > having email problems. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Ørjan Johansenwrote: > > > > I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I > could spot anything funny in the headers but I didn't), what's wrong with > it? > > > > Greetings, > > Ørjan. > > > > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > > >> I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am > slightly concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own. > >> > >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > >>> > >>> test > >> > >
Re: DIS: test
The implication that Cuddlebeam sending this email suggested e might be having email problems. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Ørjan Johansenwrote: > > I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I could > spot anything funny in the headers but I didn't), what's wrong with it? > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > >> I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am >> slightly concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own. >> >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>> On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: >>> >>> test >> signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: DIS: test
I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I could spot anything funny in the headers but I didn't), what's wrong with it? Greetings, Ørjan. On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am slightly concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beamwrote: test
Re: DIS: test
I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am slightly concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beamwrote: > > test signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: DIS: test
Uh oh. -Aris On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:22 PM Cuddle Beamwrote: > test >
DIS: test
test
Re: DIS: Test
Would it be better if I write the subject tags myself? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Alex Smithwrote: > On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: > > Is this working? > > It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter > how many I mark as "not spam" it keeps happening. > > I can unstick them manually, but finding a long-term solution to this > might well be helpful. (The DKIM signature on your emails is > "h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to;"; the Subject > field is getting rewritten on most emails, which would break it, but > some emails don't rewrite Subject and are nonetheless not getting > through, so perhaps one of the other fields is being changed by the > mailing list software too?) > > -- > ais523 >
Re: DIS: Test
On 05/20/2017 08:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: Is this working? It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter how many I mark as "not spam" it keeps happening. I distinctly remember having this problem a while back with someone else's posts. I solved it by creating a google filter that never sent anything matching the following to spam: "to:(agora-offic...@agoranomic.org OR agora-busin...@agoranomic.org OR agora-discussion@agoranomic.org) replyto:agora-discussion@agoranomic.org" Of course, this is a more sophisticated bandage, not a fix. I can unstick them manually, but finding a long-term solution to this might well be helpful. (The DKIM signature on your emails is "h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to;"; the Subject field is getting rewritten on most emails, which would break it, but some emails don't rewrite Subject and are nonetheless not getting through, so perhaps one of the other fields is being changed by the mailing list software too?)
Re: DIS: Test
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Nic Evanswrote: > I use it too, but nearly exclusively through a desktop client. Maybe it's a > problem with the web client? > > Nope. I mostly use the web client. -Aris
Re: DIS: Test
On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: > Is this working? It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter how many I mark as "not spam" it keeps happening. I can unstick them manually, but finding a long-term solution to this might well be helpful. (The DKIM signature on your emails is "h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to;"; the Subject field is getting rewritten on most emails, which would break it, but some emails don't rewrite Subject and are nonetheless not getting through, so perhaps one of the other fields is being changed by the mailing list software too?) -- ais523
Re: DIS: Test
I use it too, but nearly exclusively through a desktop client. Maybe it's a problem with the web client? On 05/20/2017 08:27 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:09 PM, CuddleBeamwrote: I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works lol, holy fuck. Kudos to PSS btw, he helped me out. Straight up gmail doesn't work apparently but they taught me the googlemail.com trick and it works and I'm super grateful. Gmail doesn't work? I've been using it for months and it works fine. Stuff gets caught in spam occasionally, but other than that... -Aris
Re: DIS: Test
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:09 PM, CuddleBeamwrote: > I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works > lol, holy fuck. > > Kudos to PSS btw, he helped me out. Straight up gmail doesn't work > apparently but they taught me the googlemail.com trick and it works and I'm > super grateful. Gmail doesn't work? I've been using it for months and it works fine. Stuff gets caught in spam occasionally, but other than that... -Aris
Re: DIS: Test
I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works lol, holy fuck. Kudos to PSS btw, he helped me out. Straight up gmail doesn't work apparently but they taught me the googlemail.com trick and it works and I'm super grateful.
Re: DIS: Test
Yeah, I noticed, but I didn't want to point it out. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, it should probably be ita vero. It's kind of scary how long I've > been doing that wrong. > > -Aris > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:15 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Yes. I appreciate the Latin. >> >> >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Aris Merchant> gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam >>> wrote: >>> Is this working? Ita vera. >>> >>> -Aris >>> >> >>
Re: DIS: Test
Actually, it should probably be ita vero. It's kind of scary how long I've been doing that wrong. -Aris On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:15 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Yes. I appreciate the Latin. > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam>> wrote: >> >>> Is this working? >>> >>> Ita vera. >> >> -Aris >> > >
Re: DIS: Test
Yes. I appreciate the Latin. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam> wrote: > >> Is this working? >> >> Ita vera. > > -Aris >
Re: DIS: Test
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeamwrote: > Is this working? > > Ita vera. -Aris
DIS: Test
Is this working?
DIS: Test
I hereby identify (give an id number to) the following proposal(s): ID Author(s) AI Title - 7820^! Alexis, ais523 1.0 Official Clarification Legend: * : Proposal is pending. + : By publishing this report, I pend the marked proposal. ^ : Proposal has already been distributed. ! : Proposal has been expedited. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. // ID: 7820 Title: Official Clarification Adoption index: 1.0 Author: Alexis Co-author(s): ais523 Amend Rule 2143 (Official Duties) by adding "A person's obligation to publish a report or other document is satisfied by eir publication of a substantially correct document if the only errors it contains are minor errors of which e is unaware.” //
DIS: test
testing digest.
Re: DIS: test
One more test - this time I'm trying to fix the DIS: Re: problem.
Re: DIS: Test
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: ☃ BRR ITS COLD
Re: DIS: Test
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:33 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Elliott Hird penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com wrote: ☃ I create a promise with text ☃ and transfer it to ehird. ...and, in a separate message to avoid any question of whether this affects the interpretation of the promise at the time it was made: I suggest defining ☃ as slang for I perform [some action], then cashing the promise. After all, even though the promise did not mean anything when it was made, if I replied to a message containing such a definition with a message of ☃, it would be clear what I intended, and a promise is a simulated message... anyway, I want to see whether it works.