Re: DIS: Test 2
On 4/11/23 15:44, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: I scheduled them to send at the exact same time (Test 1 before Test 2) Ah interesting. My guess is that when you schedule the client sets the Date to the scheduled time, even if it doesn't actually *send* at the scheduled time. That'd explain the large timespan (it probably actually sent about a minute after the scheduled time). That might be an interesting wrinkle in any potential CFJ. -- nix Prime Minister, Herald
Re: DIS: Test 2
I scheduled them to send at the exact same time (Test 1 before Test 2) On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:40 PM nix via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 4/11/23 15:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: > > I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience > The time between your DATE and the first received on these messages > seems longer than your previous messages (or other players'). Did you > schedule these, or do something to the headers? > > -- > nix > Prime Minister, Herald > >
Re: DIS: Test 2
On 4/11/23 15:00, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote: I'm testing something, sorry for the inconvenience The time between your DATE and the first received on these messages seems longer than your previous messages (or other players'). Did you schedule these, or do something to the headers? -- nix Prime Minister, Herald
Re: DIS: Test
Jason wrote: I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare Apathy. [G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.] https://scarfolk.blogspot.com/2015/08/no-1973-1975.html
Re: DIS: Test
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:44 AM Jason Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > I intend, without objection, to intend, without objection, to declare > Apathy. > > [G. suggested the archives went down on Discord.] > > -- > Jason Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason > > i object -- >From R. Lee
Re: DIS: Test
On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 18:41 +, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion wrote: > I intend, without objection, to figure out if the lists are quiet or > down. I support. -- ais523
Re: DIS: test
On 2/14/20 2:26 PM, Jason Cobb wrote: > On 2/14/20 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: >> Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if >> it's only for that message. >> >> -- Jason Cobb > > Looks like it is, since I got this back (w/o failure notice). > Oh, just figured out the cause of the error - I had typoed "discussion". Sorry for the spam. -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: test
On 2/14/20 2:25 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: > Getting some failure notices for a certain message, I want to see if > it's only for that message. > > -- Jason Cobb Looks like it is, since I got this back (w/o failure notice). -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: test
On 2/2/20 9:15 PM, omd via agora-discussion wrote: > On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote: >> Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone. > ...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the > wrong address. This time for real. Received, if it helps. -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: test
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 6:01 PM comex wrote: > Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone. ...except that didn't actually use Haraka because I sent from the wrong address. This time for real.
Re: DIS: test
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020 at 5:11 PM comexk--- via agora-discussion wrote: > Nothing to see here, move along. Now testing if Haraka can deliver to everyone.
Re: DIS: test
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019, omd wrote: Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? Maybe this is a good time to remind you (you never responded to my original message) that back in June/July (I think) I had trouble receiving list email because the list IP got on a global spam blacklist that my own mail account's mail server subscribes to, which AFAIU normally happens because such an IP sends mail to a spam trap address. I eventually solved this personally by asking one of my sysadmins. He added an explicit exception for the IP. This might indicate that occasionally that IP _is_ being used for genuine spam (maybe it's a shared address (there's no reverse DNS), or maybe there's an actual vulnerability), and if gmail is also picking up on this it's no wonder if it starts dropping stuff. Paranoid greetings, Ørjan.
Re: DIS: test should fail
Never mind; I eventually got "Yeah ... I was trying" at 03:59 UTC. On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:52, James Cook wrote: > > I got "Testing my new address filter." but not "Yeah... I was trying > to send from an unsubscribed address, ...". > > > On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:49, Jason Cobb wrote: > > > > On 12/22/19 10:35 PM, Nicholas Allegra wrote: > > > > I received this, but not Falsifian's reply nor the one that says > > "Testing my new address filter." > > > > -- > > Jason Cobb > > > > > -- > - Falsifian -- - Falsifian
Re: DIS: test should fail
I got "Testing my new address filter." but not "Yeah... I was trying to send from an unsubscribed address, ...". On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:49, Jason Cobb wrote: > > On 12/22/19 10:35 PM, Nicholas Allegra wrote: > > I received this, but not Falsifian's reply nor the one that says > "Testing my new address filter." > > -- > Jason Cobb > -- - Falsifian
Re: DIS: test
On 12/22/19 10:34 PM, omd wrote: Testing my new address filter. On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 3:25 PM omd wrote: Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? Sorry, just received this; disregard my previous message. -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: test should fail
On 12/22/19 10:35 PM, Nicholas Allegra wrote: I received this, but not Falsifian's reply nor the one that says "Testing my new address filter." -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: test should fail
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 7:37 PM James Cook wrote: > I got this one. Yeah... I was trying to send from an unsubscribed address, but I didn't realize that when sending from an alias, Gmail would keep my normal address in the envelope. Whoops.
Re: DIS: test should fail
I got this one. On Mon, 23 Dec 2019 at 03:36, Nicholas Allegra wrote: > > -- - Falsifian
Re: DIS: test
Testing my new address filter. On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 3:25 PM omd wrote: > > Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP?
Re: DIS: test
On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 at 23:25, Jason Cobb wrote: > On 12/22/19 6:24 PM, omd wrote: > > Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? > > Received. > > -- > Jason Cobb I got both these messages, but GMail attached the note "This message was not sent to Spam because of a filter you created." to omd's. -- - Falsifian
Re: DIS: test
On 12/22/19 6:24 PM, omd wrote: Will Gmail deliver a list message if it's sent from a different IP? Received. -- Jason Cobb
Re: DIS: Test of a-d
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 10:58 -0800, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote: > This is a test of what happens if I don't add "DIS:" to the subject > line ahead of time. I received this (and the a-b and a-o versions too). The mailing list rewrote the "From:" line in order to prevent a DMARC mismatch. -- ais523
Re: DIS: test post
Actually I was testing if my new email was subscribed correctly (yes, obviously), and if my filters put the returning message in the right place (no they didn't, but I'll try to minimize tests to fix that). On 12/28/2018 8:42 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: I received this, if that's what you were trying to test. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, December 28, 2018 4:24 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: testing new email filters
Re: DIS: test post
I received this, if that's what you were trying to test. -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, December 28, 2018 4:24 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > testing new email filters
Re: DIS: Test (not a report)
I messed around with some settings and now it is working properly. On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:56 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing > characters actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the > rest of you? > > -twg > > ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │ATMunn │ 6│ 37│ 2│ 0│ 7│ 0│ 79│ 16│ 0│ 15│ > │Aris │ 5│ 35│ 11│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 117│ 17│ 0│ 14│ > │Corona │ 31│ 92│ 48│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 170│ 31│ 233│ 16│ > │CuddleBeam │ 11│ 23│ 9│ 4│ 8│ 9│ 60│ 12│ 0│ 14│ > │G. │ 42│ 91│ 23│ 0│ 6│ 3│ 613│ 33│ 68│ 36│ > │Murphy │ 0│ 27│ 6│ 0│ 3│ 0│ 76│ 13│ 0│ 14│ > │omd │ 0│ 5│ 1│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 15│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Pub. Scrib. Schol. │ 5│ 20│ 0│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 28│ 7│ 0│ 9│ > │Trigon │ 2│ 14│ 17│ 4│ 0│ 0│ 49│ 9│ 0│ 14│ > │twg │ 31│ 84│ 4│ 0│ 35│ 3│ 393│ 17│ 0│ 25│ > │V.J. Rada│ 10│ 75│ 3│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 105│ 24│ 0│ 28│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Gaelan │ 14│ 33│ 2│ 6│ 2│ 0│ 57│ 12│ 0│ 14│ > │Kenyon │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ > │nichdel │ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ > │o│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Ouri │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ > │pokes│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Quazie │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Telnaior │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │天火狐│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > └─┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┘ >
Re: DIS: Test (not a report)
needs an explicit declaration of monospace typestyle: [image: needs monospace.PNG] Here it is in monospace, gmail's "fixed width" option: > ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │ATMunn │ 6│ 37│ 2│ 0│ 7│ 0│ 79│ 16│ 0│ 15│ > │Aris │ 5│ 35│ 11│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 117│ 17│ 0│ 14│ > │Corona │ 31│ 92│ 48│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 170│ 31│ 233│ 16│ > │CuddleBeam │ 11│ 23│ 9│ 4│ 8│ 9│ 60│ 12│ 0│ 14│ > │G. │ 42│ 91│ 23│ 0│ 6│ 3│ 613│ 33│ 68│ 36│ > │Murphy │ 0│ 27│ 6│ 0│ 3│ 0│ 76│ 13│ 0│ 14│ > │omd │ 0│ 5│ 1│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 15│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Pub. Scrib. Schol. │ 5│ 20│ 0│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 28│ 7│ 0│ 9│ > │Trigon │ 2│ 14│ 17│ 4│ 0│ 0│ 49│ 9│ 0│ 14│ > │twg │ 31│ 84│ 4│ 0│ 35│ 3│ 393│ 17│ 0│ 25│ > │V.J. Rada│ 10│ 75│ 3│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 105│ 24│ 0│ 28│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Gaelan │ 14│ 33│ 2│ 6│ 2│ 0│ 57│ 12│ 0│ 14│ > │Kenyon │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ > │nichdel │ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ > │o│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Ouri │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ > │pokes│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Quazie │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Telnaior │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │天火狐│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > └─┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┘ > > -- "At this point, given the limited available data, certainty about only a very small number of things can be achieved." -- Plato, and others
Re: DIS: Test (not a report)
Looks sharp/nice/correct to me. With the usual exception of that Japanese line (but it's less out-of-line then other reports have been). On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing > characters > actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the rest of you? > > -twg > > ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │ATMunn │ 6│ 37│ 2│ 0│ 7│ 0│ 79│ 16│ 0│ 15│ > │Aris │ 5│ 35│ 11│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 117│ 17│ 0│ 14│ > │Corona │ 31│ 92│ 48│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 170│ 31│ 233│ 16│ > │CuddleBeam │ 11│ 23│ 9│ 4│ 8│ 9│ 60│ 12│ 0│ 14│ > │G. │ 42│ 91│ 23│ 0│ 6│ 3│ 613│ 33│ 68│ 36│ > │Murphy │ 0│ 27│ 6│ 0│ 3│ 0│ 76│ 13│ 0│ 14│ > │omd │ 0│ 5│ 1│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 15│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Pub. Scrib. Schol. │ 5│ 20│ 0│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 28│ 7│ 0│ 9│ > │Trigon │ 2│ 14│ 17│ 4│ 0│ 0│ 49│ 9│ 0│ 14│ > │twg │ 31│ 84│ 4│ 0│ 35│ 3│ 393│ 17│ 0│ 25│ > │V.J. Rada│ 10│ 75│ 3│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 105│ 24│ 0│ 28│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Gaelan │ 14│ 33│ 2│ 6│ 2│ 0│ 57│ 12│ 0│ 14│ > │Kenyon │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ > │nichdel │ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ > │o│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Ouri │ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ > │pokes│ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Quazie │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │Telnaior │ 0│ 5│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 10│ 2│ 0│ 3│ > │天火狐│ 0│ 10│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 0│ 20│ 4│ 0│ 6│ > ├─┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┼┤ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > └─┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┴┘ > >
Re: DIS: Test (not a report)
Hmm. Perhaps an experiment to shelve for the time being. 🤔 -twg ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On July 16, 2018 3:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > > =E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=90 > > =E2=94=82Entity =E2=94=82Ston=E2=94=82Appl=E2=94=82Corn=E2=94= > > =82 Ore=E2=94=82Lmbr=E2=94=82Cotn=E2=94=82Coin=E2=94=82Papr=E2=94=82Fabr=E2= > > =94=82Incs=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=A4 > > =E2=94=82ATMunn =E2=94=82 6=E2=94=82 37=E2=94=82 2=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 7=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 79=E2=94=82 16=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 15=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82Aris =E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 35=E2=94=82 11=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 117=E2=94=82 17=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 14=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82Corona =E2=94=82 31=E2=94=82 92=E2=94=82 48=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 10=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 170=E2=94=82 31=E2=94=82 233=E2= > > =94=82 16=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82CuddleBeam =E2=94=82 11=E2=94=82 23=E2=94=82 9=E2=94= > > =82 4=E2=94=82 8=E2=94=82 9=E2=94=82 60=E2=94=82 12=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 14=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82G. =E2=94=82 42=E2=94=82 91=E2=94=82 23=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 6=E2=94=82 3=E2=94=82 613=E2=94=82 33=E2=94=82 68=E2= > > =94=82 36=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82Murphy =E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 27=E2=94=82 6=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 3=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 76=E2=94=82 13=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 14=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82omd =E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 1=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 15=E2=94=82 2=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 3=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82Pub. Scrib. Schol. =E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 20=E2=94=82 0=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 28=E2=94=82 7=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 9=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82Trigon =E2=94=82 2=E2=94=82 14=E2=94=82 17=E2=94= > > =82 4=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 49=E2=94=82 9=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 14=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82twg =E2=94=82 31=E2=94=82 84=E2=94=82 4=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 35=E2=94=82 3=E2=94=82 393=E2=94=82 17=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 25=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=82V.J. Rada =E2=94=82 10=E2=94=82 75=E2=94=82 3=E2=94= > > =82 0=E2=94=82 10=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 105=E2=94=82 24=E2=94=82 0=E2= > > =94=82 28=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=A4 > > =E2=94=82Entity =E2=94=82Ston=E2=94=82Appl=E2=94=82Corn=E2=94= > > =82 Ore=E2=94=82Lmbr=E2=94=82Cotn=E2=94=82Coin=E2=94=82Papr=E2=94=82Fabr=E2= > > =94=82Incs=E2=94=82 > > =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= > > =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= > > =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=
Re: DIS: Test (not a report)
=E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=90 =E2=94=82Entity =E2=94=82Ston=E2=94=82Appl=E2=94=82Corn=E2=94= =82 Ore=E2=94=82Lmbr=E2=94=82Cotn=E2=94=82Coin=E2=94=82Papr=E2=94=82Fabr=E2= =94=82Incs=E2=94=82 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=A4 =E2=94=82ATMunn =E2=94=82 6=E2=94=82 37=E2=94=82 2=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 7=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 79=E2=94=82 16=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 15=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82Aris =E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 35=E2=94=82 11=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 117=E2=94=82 17=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 14=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82Corona =E2=94=82 31=E2=94=82 92=E2=94=82 48=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 10=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 170=E2=94=82 31=E2=94=82 233=E2= =94=82 16=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82CuddleBeam =E2=94=82 11=E2=94=82 23=E2=94=82 9=E2=94= =82 4=E2=94=82 8=E2=94=82 9=E2=94=82 60=E2=94=82 12=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 14=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82G. =E2=94=82 42=E2=94=82 91=E2=94=82 23=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 6=E2=94=82 3=E2=94=82 613=E2=94=82 33=E2=94=82 68=E2= =94=82 36=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82Murphy =E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 27=E2=94=82 6=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 3=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 76=E2=94=82 13=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 14=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82omd =E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 1=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 15=E2=94=82 2=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 3=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82Pub. Scrib. Schol. =E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 20=E2=94=82 0=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 5=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 28=E2=94=82 7=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 9=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82Trigon =E2=94=82 2=E2=94=82 14=E2=94=82 17=E2=94= =82 4=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 49=E2=94=82 9=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 14=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82twg =E2=94=82 31=E2=94=82 84=E2=94=82 4=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 35=E2=94=82 3=E2=94=82 393=E2=94=82 17=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 25=E2=94=82 =E2=94=82V.J. Rada=E2=94=82 10=E2=94=82 75=E2=94=82 3=E2=94= =82 0=E2=94=82 10=E2=94=82 0=E2=94=82 105=E2=94=82 24=E2=94=82 0=E2= =94=82 28=E2=94=82 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=A4 =E2=94=82Entity =E2=94=82Ston=E2=94=82Appl=E2=94=82Corn=E2=94= =82 Ore=E2=94=82Lmbr=E2=94=82Cotn=E2=94=82Coin=E2=94=82Papr=E2=94=82Fabr=E2= =94=82Incs=E2=94=82 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=BC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=A4 =E2=94=82Gaelan =E2=94=82
Re: DIS: Test
*HTML preformatted style, perhaps?* *+---++++---+++++++ * *|Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| * *+---++++---+++++++ * *|ATMunn | 10| 35| 0| 0| 10| 0| 39| 10| 0| 5| * *|Aris | 5| 25| 7| 0| 5| 0| 77| 5| 0| 5| * *|Corona | 24| 40| 21| 17| 9| 18| 89| 16| 0| 5| * *|CuddleBeam | 11| 13| 9| 4| 8| 9| 40| 8| 0| 5| * *|G. | 20| 90| 11| 0| 20| 0| 140| 29| 0| 5| * *|Gaelan | 14| 23| 2| 6| 2| 0| 37| 8| 0| 5| * *|Kenyon | 14| 32| 4| 6| 20| 3| 35| 7| 0| 5| * *|Murphy | 5| 25| 4| 0| 8| 0| 60| 9| 0| 5| * *|Publius Scribonius Scholasticus| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| 0| 0| * *|Quazie | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|Telnaior | 5| 25| 3| 0| 5| 0| 55| 9| 0| 0| * *|Trigon | 3| 20| 11| 2| 4| 12| 28| 6| 0| 5| * *|VJ Rada| 10| 45| 1| 0| 10| 0| 55| 15| 0| 5| * *|nichdel| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| 0| 0| * *|o | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|omd| 0| 10| 0| 0| 0| 0| 20| 4| 0| 0| * *|Ouri | 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 14| 2| 0| 5| * *|pokes | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|天火狐 | 5| 25| 0| 0| 5| 0| 40| 9| 0| 5| * *+---++++---+++++++ * *|farm at 1,-1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|mine at -1,-1 | 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|mine at 1,1| 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|orchard at -1,1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|(Corona’s) mine at 0,2 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|(Corona’s) refinery at 1,-2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|(Corona’s) orchard at 2,1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| * *|Finger Pointing Workaround | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| 0| 0| * *|Agora | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 174| 0| 0| 0| * *+---++++---+++++++* +---++++---+++++++ |Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| +---++++---+++++++ |ATMunn | 10| 35| 0| 0| 10| 0| 39| 10| 0| 5| |Aris | 5| 25| 7| 0| 5| 0| 77| 5| 0| 5| |Corona | 24| 40| 21| 17| 9| 18| 89| 16| 0| 5| |CuddleBeam | 11| 13| 9| 4| 8| 9| 40| 8| 0| 5| |G. | 20| 90| 11| 0| 20| 0| 140| 29| 0| 5| |Gaelan | 14| 23| 2| 6| 2| 0| 37| 8| 0| 5| |Kenyon | 14| 32| 4| 6| 20| 3| 35| 7| 0| 5| |Murphy | 5| 25| 4| 0| 8| 0| 60| 9| 0| 5| |Publius Scribonius Scholasticus| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| 0| 0| |Quazie | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |Telnaior | 5| 25| 3| 0| 5| 0| 55| 9| 0| 0| |Trigon | 3| 20| 11| 2| 4| 12| 28| 6| 0| 5| |VJ Rada| 10| 45| 1| 0| 10| 0| 55| 15| 0| 5| |nichdel| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| 0| 0| |o | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |omd| 0| 10| 0| 0| 0| 0| 20| 4| 0| 0| |Ouri | 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 14| 2| 0| 5| |pokes | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |天火狐 | 5| 25| 0| 0| 5| 0| 40| 9| 0| 5| +---++++---+++++++ |farm at 1,-1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |mine at -1,-1 | 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |mine at 1,1| 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |orchard at -1,1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| |(Corona’s) mine at 0,2 |
Re: DIS: Test
Why... How do you all make the tables??? (Let me try reposting Gaelan's previous report) +---++++---++++++ |*Entity |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr| *+---++++---++++++ |*ATMunn | 5| 15| 0| 0| 5| 0| 20| 3| 0| *|*Aris | 5| 20| 4| 0| 5| 0| 50| 7| 0| *|*Corona | 11| 14| 2| 4| 5| 0| 45| 6| 0| *|*CuddleBeam | 11| 8| 9| 4| 8| 9| 30| 6| 0| *|*G. | 5| 20| 5| 0| 5| 0| 55| 6| 0| *|*Gaelan | 5| 20| 1| 0| 2| 0| 35| 6| 0| *|*Kenyon | 14| 21| 3| 6| 14| 3| 30| 7| 0| *|*Murphy | 5| 20| 4| 0| 8| 0| 50| 7| 0| *|*Publius Scribonius Scholasticus| 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*Quazie | 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*Telnaior | 5| 20| 2| 0| 5| 0| 40| 7| 0| *|*Trigon | 5| 20| 1| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*VJ Rada| 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*nichdel| 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*o | 5| 20| 2| 0| 5| 0| 40| 7| 0| *|*omd| 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*pokes | 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*天火狐 | 5| 20| 0| 0| 5| 0| 30| 7| 0| *|*farm at 1,-1 | 0| 0| 6| 0| 0| 6| 0| 0| 0| *|*mine at -1,-1 | 9| 0| 0| 6| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| *|*mine at 1,1| 6| 0| 0| 4| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| *|*orchard at -1,1| 0| 6| 0| 0| 6| 0| 0| 0| 0| *+---++++---++++++ ~Corona On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 9:14 PM, Corona wrote: > Testing the tables > > > +---++++---++--- > -+++++ > |Entity > |Ston|Appl|Corn|Ore|Lmbr|Cotn|Coin|Papr|Fabr|Incs| > +---++++---++--- > -+++++ > |ATMunn | 10| 35| 0| 0| 10| 0| 39| 10| > 0| 5| > |Aris | 5| 25| 7| 0| 5| 0| 77| 5| > 0| 5| > |Corona | 24| 40| 21| 17| 9| 18| 89| 16| > 0| 5| > |CuddleBeam | 11| 13| 9| 4| 8| 9| 40| 8| > 0| 5| > |G. | 20| 90| 11| 0| 20| 0| 140| 29| > 0| 5| > |Gaelan | 14| 23| 2| 6| 2| 0| 37| 8| > 0| 5| > |Kenyon | 14| 32| 4| 6| 20| 3| 35| 7| > 0| 5| > |Murphy | 5| 25| 4| 0| 8| 0| 60| 9| > 0| 5| > |Publius Scribonius Scholasticus| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| > 0| 0| > |Quazie | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |Telnaior | 5| 25| 3| 0| 5| 0| 55| 9| > 0| 0| > |Trigon | 3| 20| 11| 2| 4| 12| 28| 6| > 0| 5| > |VJ Rada| 10| 45| 1| 0| 10| 0| 55| 15| > 0| 5| > |nichdel| 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 10| 2| > 0| 0| > |o | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |omd| 0| 10| 0| 0| 0| 0| 20| 4| > 0| 0| > |Ouri | 0| 5| 0| 0| 0| 0| 14| 2| > 0| 5| > |pokes | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |天火狐 | 5| 25| 0| 0| 5| 0| 40| 9| 0| > 5| > +---++++---++--- > -+++++ > |farm at 1,-1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |mine at -1,-1 | 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |mine at 1,1| 3| 0| 0| 2| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |orchard at -1,1| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |(Corona’s) mine at 0,2 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |(Corona’s) refinery at 1,-2| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |(Corona’s) orchard at 2,1 | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| > 0| 0| > |Finger Pointing Workaround | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 1| 0| > 0| 0| > |Agora | 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 0| 174| 0| > 0| 0| > +---++-
Re: DIS: test message please ignore
My nickname: dragging Agora to like 1992 in terms of internationalization of its encoding. 天火狐 On 22 November 2017 at 19:59, ATMunn wrote: > Yeah, I've noticed this as well, it happens in my text editor as well. I > tend to go with the approach of having the | be in the same column. > > > On 11/22/2017 7:56 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > >> On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: >> >>> Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | >>> >>> Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | >>> >>> Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | >>> >> According to the Unicode standards, the vast majority of Japanese >> characters (whichever alphabet they come from) are intended to be twice >> as wide as an English letter would be in a monospace font. >> >> However, many email clients suck at enforcing this rule in practice >> (e.g. mine seems to be displaying the above three-character word as >> just over five columns wide). In order to avoid making peoples' eyes >> bleed, I tend to use a footnote whenever I have to write 天火狐's name in >> tabular data, so that it doesn't need to line up with anything else. >> >>
Re: DIS: test message please ignore
Yeah, I've noticed this as well, it happens in my text editor as well. I tend to go with the approach of having the | be in the same column. On 11/22/2017 7:56 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | Telnaior| 天火狐 | Trigon | According to the Unicode standards, the vast majority of Japanese characters (whichever alphabet they come from) are intended to be twice as wide as an English letter would be in a monospace font. However, many email clients suck at enforcing this rule in practice (e.g. mine seems to be displaying the above three-character word as just over five columns wide). In order to avoid making peoples' eyes bleed, I tend to use a footnote whenever I have to write 天火狐's name in tabular data, so that it doesn't need to line up with anything else.
Re: DIS: test message please ignore
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 at 19:57 Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: > > > Telnaior| > > > 天火狐 | > > > Trigon | > > > > > Telnaior| > > > 天火狐 | > > > Trigon | > > > > > Telnaior| > > > 天火狐 | > > > Trigon | > > According to the Unicode standards, the vast majority of Japanese > characters (whichever alphabet they come from) are intended to be twice > as wide as an English letter would be in a monospace font. > > However, many email clients suck at enforcing this rule in practice > (e.g. mine seems to be displaying the above three-character word as > just over five columns wide). In order to avoid making peoples' eyes > bleed, I tend to use a footnote whenever I have to write 天火狐's name in > tabular data, so that it doesn't need to line up with anything else. > Yeah, I noticed that too. I do my Tailor reports in a text editor, which handles them correctly. Not sure about Rulekeepor; word-wrapping there is done by a library which I'd have to look up how it actually handles it. My guess is that it treats them as width-1, so it occasionally goes over.
Re: DIS: test message please ignore
On Thu, 2017-11-23 at 11:45 +1100, Madeline wrote: > > Telnaior| > > 天火狐 | > > Trigon | > > > Telnaior| > > 天火狐 | > > Trigon | > > > Telnaior| > > 天火狐 | > > Trigon | According to the Unicode standards, the vast majority of Japanese characters (whichever alphabet they come from) are intended to be twice as wide as an English letter would be in a monospace font. However, many email clients suck at enforcing this rule in practice (e.g. mine seems to be displaying the above three-character word as just over five columns wide). In order to avoid making peoples' eyes bleed, I tend to use a footnote whenever I have to write 天火狐's name in tabular data, so that it doesn't need to line up with anything else. -- ais523
Re: DIS: Test
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > > Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam? > > It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with > respect to sending. If this message gets through, presumably others > will too. I did not receive this. (I kid. It came through fine.) -o signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: DIS: Test
me too. On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > I received this. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >> On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith wrote: >> >> Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam? >> >> It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with >> respect to sending. If this message gets through, presumably others >> will too. >> >> -- >> ais523 > -- >From V.J. Rada
Re: DIS: Test
I received this. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 22, 2017, at 4:34 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > > Possibly the first time one of these /isn't/ a timing scam? > > It's possible my email problems have been resolved, at least with > respect to sending. If this message gets through, presumably others > will too. > > -- > ais523 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: DIS: test
Yeah, that was the thing I wanted to try to exploit. Unfortunately SLR and other stuff are not self-ratifying like other reports. On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 at 09:39, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > > > This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given > that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. > > > > Gaelan > > The “Estate Auctions” rule is missing a paragraph, I believe. > > -o > >
Re: DIS: test
> On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:13 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that > your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. > > Gaelan The “Estate Auctions” rule is missing a paragraph, I believe. -o signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: DIS: test
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > test > > This concludes our test of the emergency scam response system. > > Had this been an actual working scam, it probably wouldn't have > involved CuddleBeam I refer the interested students to the list of Scamsters. OscarMeyr
Re: DIS: test
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > test This concludes our test of the emergency scam response system. Had this been an actual working scam, it probably wouldn't have involved CuddleBeam.
Re: DIS: test
Auctions became unregulated. It was just "an auction" and such. Presumably I could just make my own. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: > > This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given >> that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. >> > > The last paragraph of rule 2491 is duplicated. I don't see how that allows > any scam though... > > Greetings, > Ørjan.
Re: DIS: test
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote: This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. The last paragraph of rule 2491 is duplicated. I don't see how that allows any scam though... Greetings, Ørjan.
Re: DIS: test
This worries me. Is there something in the SLR that is incorrect? Given that your scam doesn’t work, I see little harm in you sharing. Gaelan > On Sep 18, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > I don't have any email problems fortunately. I was trying to pull a scam > which relied on timing and I wanted to see what time appeared on the archives > for my message to compare with a-o. > > Sorry for any concerns. > > Also, my scam didn't work because the SLR isn't self-ratifying and now I cry > in a corner lol > >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> wrote: >> The implication that Cuddlebeam sending this email suggested e might be >> having email problems. >> >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: >> > >> > I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I could >> > spot anything funny in the headers but I didn't), what's wrong with it? >> > >> > Greetings, >> > Ørjan. >> > >> > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> > >> >> I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am >> >> slightly concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own. >> >> >> >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: >> >>> >> >>> test >> >> >> >
Re: DIS: test
I don't have any email problems fortunately. I was trying to pull a scam which relied on timing and I wanted to see what time appeared on the archives for my message to compare with a-o. Sorry for any concerns. Also, my scam didn't work because the SLR isn't self-ratifying and now I cry in a corner lol On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > The implication that Cuddlebeam sending this email suggested e might be > having email problems. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > > > > I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I > could spot anything funny in the headers but I didn't), what's wrong with > it? > > > > Greetings, > > Ørjan. > > > > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > > >> I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am > slightly concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own. > >> > >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > >>> > >>> test > >> > >
Re: DIS: test
The implication that Cuddlebeam sending this email suggested e might be having email problems. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:52 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > > I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I could > spot anything funny in the headers but I didn't), what's wrong with it? > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > >> I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am >> slightly concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own. >> >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>> On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: >>> >>> test >> signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: DIS: test
I received it too (but already deleted it, after briefly seeing if I could spot anything funny in the headers but I didn't), what's wrong with it? Greetings, Ørjan. On Mon, 18 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am slightly concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: test
Re: DIS: test
I received this, but I concur with Aris this could be a problem. I am slightly concerned that gmail users may be forming a cult of their own. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > test signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: DIS: test
Uh oh. -Aris On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:22 PM Cuddle Beam wrote: > test >
Re: DIS: Test
Would it be better if I write the subject tags myself? Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote: > On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: > > Is this working? > > It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter > how many I mark as "not spam" it keeps happening. > > I can unstick them manually, but finding a long-term solution to this > might well be helpful. (The DKIM signature on your emails is > "h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to;"; the Subject > field is getting rewritten on most emails, which would break it, but > some emails don't rewrite Subject and are nonetheless not getting > through, so perhaps one of the other fields is being changed by the > mailing list software too?) > > -- > ais523 >
Re: DIS: Test
On 05/20/2017 08:50 PM, Alex Smith wrote: On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: Is this working? It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter how many I mark as "not spam" it keeps happening. I distinctly remember having this problem a while back with someone else's posts. I solved it by creating a google filter that never sent anything matching the following to spam: "to:(agora-offic...@agoranomic.org OR agora-busin...@agoranomic.org OR agora-discussion@agoranomic.org) replyto:agora-discussion@agoranomic.org" Of course, this is a more sophisticated bandage, not a fix. I can unstick them manually, but finding a long-term solution to this might well be helpful. (The DKIM signature on your emails is "h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to;"; the Subject field is getting rewritten on most emails, which would break it, but some emails don't rewrite Subject and are nonetheless not getting through, so perhaps one of the other fields is being changed by the mailing list software too?)
Re: DIS: Test
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Nic Evans wrote: > I use it too, but nearly exclusively through a desktop client. Maybe it's a > problem with the web client? > > Nope. I mostly use the web client. -Aris
Re: DIS: Test
On Sun, 2017-05-21 at 02:11 +0200, CuddleBeam wrote: > Is this working? It's going to my spam folder, just like PSS's posts are, and no matter how many I mark as "not spam" it keeps happening. I can unstick them manually, but finding a long-term solution to this might well be helpful. (The DKIM signature on your emails is "h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to;"; the Subject field is getting rewritten on most emails, which would break it, but some emails don't rewrite Subject and are nonetheless not getting through, so perhaps one of the other fields is being changed by the mailing list software too?) -- ais523
Re: DIS: Test
I use it too, but nearly exclusively through a desktop client. Maybe it's a problem with the web client? On 05/20/2017 08:27 PM, Aris Merchant wrote: On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:09 PM, CuddleBeam wrote: I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works lol, holy fuck. Kudos to PSS btw, he helped me out. Straight up gmail doesn't work apparently but they taught me the googlemail.com trick and it works and I'm super grateful. Gmail doesn't work? I've been using it for months and it works fine. Stuff gets caught in spam occasionally, but other than that... -Aris
Re: DIS: Test
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 6:09 PM, CuddleBeam wrote: > I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works > lol, holy fuck. > > Kudos to PSS btw, he helped me out. Straight up gmail doesn't work > apparently but they taught me the googlemail.com trick and it works and I'm > super grateful. Gmail doesn't work? I've been using it for months and it works fine. Stuff gets caught in spam occasionally, but other than that... -Aris
Re: DIS: Test
I've been trying to get this to work for months and now it finally works lol, holy fuck. Kudos to PSS btw, he helped me out. Straight up gmail doesn't work apparently but they taught me the googlemail.com trick and it works and I'm super grateful.
Re: DIS: Test
Yeah, I noticed, but I didn't want to point it out. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, it should probably be ita vero. It's kind of scary how long I've > been doing that wrong. > > -Aris > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:15 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < > p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Yes. I appreciate the Latin. >> >> >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Aris Merchant > gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam >>> wrote: >>> Is this working? Ita vera. >>> >>> -Aris >>> >> >>
Re: DIS: Test
Actually, it should probably be ita vero. It's kind of scary how long I've been doing that wrong. -Aris On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:15 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Yes. I appreciate the Latin. > > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Aris Merchant < > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam >> wrote: >> >>> Is this working? >>> >>> Ita vera. >> >> -Aris >> > >
Re: DIS: Test
Yes. I appreciate the Latin. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam > wrote: > >> Is this working? >> >> Ita vera. > > -Aris >
Re: DIS: Test
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:11 PM CuddleBeam wrote: > Is this working? > > Ita vera. -Aris
Re: DIS: test
One more test - this time I'm trying to fix the "DIS: Re:" problem.
Re: DIS: Test
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:33 PM, omd wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Elliott Hird > wrote: >> ☃ > > I create a promise with text "☃" and transfer it to ehird. ...and, in a separate message to avoid any question of whether this affects the interpretation of the promise at the time it was made: I suggest defining ☃ as slang for "I perform [some action]", then cashing the promise. After all, even though the promise did not mean anything when it was made, if I replied to a message containing such a definition with a message of "☃", it would be clear what I intended, and a promise is a simulated message... anyway, I want to see whether it works.
Re: DIS: Test
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > ☃ BRR ITS COLD
Re: DIS: Test
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Elliott Hird < penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 27 August 2012 09:32, Sean Christopher Sherwood Hunt > wrote: > > This is a test email; please ignore. > > Don't tell me what to do. > > CFJ: That was a test email; please ignore. > Ignoring it as TTDF. -- OscarMeyr
Re: DIS: Test
On 27 August 2012 09:32, Sean Christopher Sherwood Hunt wrote: > This is a test email; please ignore. Don't tell me what to do. CFJ: That was a test email; please ignore.
Re: DIS: test
On 14 March 2012 11:49, Elliott Hird wrote: > test
Re: DIS: test
On Sun, 2011-07-17 at 02:41 -0700, Sean Hunt wrote: I support and -- ais523
Re: DIS: test
I support and do so. ~ Roujo On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 5:08 PM, ais523 wrote: > On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:06 +, ais523 wrote: >> This is a test. > > Whoops, wrong year... > > (I was checking to see if there was some sort of firewall preventing me > just sending email by hand from this connection. It seems there isn't.) > > -- > ais523 > >
Re: DIS: test
On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 10:06 +, ais523 wrote: > This is a test. Whoops, wrong year... (I was checking to see if there was some sort of firewall preventing me just sending email by hand from this connection. It seems there isn't.) -- ais523
Re: DIS: test
I support. On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:57 AM, ais523 wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:52 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote: >> this am a test > > I object. > > -- > ais523 > >
Re: DIS: test
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 10:52 -0500, Sean Hunt wrote: > this am a test I object. -- ais523
Re: DIS: test
On 05/02/2010 11:30 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: testing... Sorry for the spam; I was testing my automated mail delivery which had broken. Looks like I finally found the problem. -coppro
Re: DIS: test
2009/8/23 Pavitra : > Testing PGP/MIME for readability. > > In Gmail, below the message there is a horizontal rule (not full-width) and a text attachment available called signature.asc. It's quite small and ignorable. I can view it with one click. (I'm probably the one who complained about it being in-message.)
Re: DIS: test
I wrote: > Pavitra wrote: > >> Testing PGP/MIME for readability. > > Looks fine here (Thunderbird 2.0.0.23) Clarification: the PGP stuff is not shown unless I select View Source; I have not attempted to do anything else with it.
Re: DIS: test
Pavitra wrote: > Testing PGP/MIME for readability. Looks fine here (Thunderbird 2.0.0.23)
Re: DIS: test
ais523 wrote: > On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 17:03 -0500, Pavitra wrote: >> Testing PGP/MIME for readability. > > What's your public key? Obviously there's basically no security against a MITM attack here (the Distributor is in a particularly good position to execute it, and is known to be generally familiar with PGP), but here it is for the lulz. ID: 0xC947500EA8107B7D Fingerprint: 3219 DF6A B330 EFBD 1A42 E887 C947 500E A810 7B7D Full public key: -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) mQGiBEZI6BkRBAC1A7FPWjCVvXHI4uiYi0n44M15gi+V5RsnabbvDy5Q8zVY/Bfg Ie7fUrgsaBNgGtR0DWKmqWkunZByYdLfoI/bwRJsPEbm1aJxpT1rC0ssjASHTwQN oT5O3U8qv88xPLaZ6GH+vccoM0LNqA4BbbYxfNRL+DfPmgkW77wk1+nEawCg6txI WKvjzGKM7jlFt4IQV+wTm2ED/R5uf3/0zoAQCOSBMFqtko1ggJyEBv1l3v9WJrux 1h24DZMwtJaearGLCZyH9vZgocYt6GbXzm9Kgdk/AwliI4dHVIO2chmGhzqH7o0V zq0i8a6l5nA5kXskivAglmQdXtBx0SImBRB10etqLystchPlQZwqvX7/dFDMTi6D ShSFA/9ze8zouHS9Dr5WKiQlCvJHwLwmzy24MmLQKuiv5eralGN1tJ0CVg8NZPiC eAKlTjWCoXNjcXNlndcxp6WpCYuLmw4R64t/bv7vvAV0KQRNDTed8PSMVjmA7COK tIOi/TX8z0quAF2S+tVJzYO3b59hTu64LcklNrq+hFcSsxrqS7QsQmVuamFtaW4g Q2FwbGFuIDxiZW5qYW1pbkBiZW5qYW1pbi5mcmVlbWFpbD6IYAQTEQIAIAIbAwYL CQgHAwIEFQIIAwQWAgMBAh4BAheABQJKGfDxAAoJEMlHUA6oEHt9VZwAoKNMaRD9 Lry4zLuk999G4K20c29kAKDUtYdI34X6OnxqCzrHnF4+Np+9n7QuQmVuamFtaW4g Q2FwbGFuIDxjZWxlc3RpYWxjb2duaXRpb25AZ21haWwuY29tPohjBBMRAgAjAhsD BgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYCAwECHgECF4AFAkqPEW8CGQEACgkQyUdQDqgQe30r8gCg 5kgFKsQpILuJldBBz8ohZaz+rcYAnjbhVSnex/asLNGdK5tGL+oZTRHQtLxCZW5q YW1pbiBDYXBsYW4gPGJlbmphbWluQHB6bWVndDNqbnZ4Z3E1cm5wenJkaTUzcG5u a3V5dWN3cGZxeDR1bHlqajN1Nm5zZmpqM3Myd3RubGJqdTZua2Rpam5oZ2xjb212 aXhvdmNpajQzZnNzZGpqNXV1Y3UzdWpmcnV5dWtwa3JpdWN3dHNrYnZkZXp6cmlq aXc0NWtiaGV5Zm1tZHpvdnpzeXFrcmlmYnVjcWtmLmZyZWVtYWlsPohgBBMRAgAg BQJJp3JVAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQyUdQDqgQe33iDQCf deg+tXGYHxxxTWJOu1Pk3Y9TqskAnigb8UmBkdTj/7kAs4pzkWR/Xn23uQQNBEZI 8NYQEAC077mgukPYOylovYUgHu7H9MARZWRARgjpHyGmNnNICMjdwYgC+rb5dZ2T SNsVQdW0uk5g3wwU0GNiLj1U2sLanyHEJ43/Ny9z2Pc152L/grCVFZfBPmjxUjjH 3M0dAWGSsJcu+sAvIH7XdBdo6FacidgF5gp8IQw2Zv2vPUke16a6teoh0/knukyJ NhXiKAhiiK38jG9b/pRm10dx1y0px8yJihh+kJEodXeqGFDN4gsA07iaPgui+TMB trAbAiKJPNYbPM0Q7K+GHI4kjn8X1t7o/MJh5Pd8NXXZvpmc1bL5VvJm1J8Y3BQO nyEdG5F/uzN08s1Hw6RZ+IUmfygD92O7OTGSPsO12oCIA1ACBb3PURnBeq0kxrh1 m3uTesrrr9M/dzB1JSLfIqpIXBUcgHhJVqg/T7R4JNJONsV2qwabQXVxabzF1yGY Ipwons2YUP6FtAWyrbQZqyO9RH7pqcPPmfUSBplTDvUCKFz2gIijNfkGqcGXI0hl jtP19qEpvg0870su3rq1aNt/L123Axbg4dhOew0qAg+FHguMlNTThZQ1hG0JdXjq M6fmvoHO1atgxzK5zRNqXUH4bFZKtnU980GrwSnwCh2f0mKKBkhMoDfpp09zs3z3 WXmw70jRCU6EnurV+690Uq8UZONahFPn+rTawNeJg5z/Eo0y6wADBRAAj/yzyPAW FaKXv+XDrrkynCUd8Rr4HC88QHenxkdR4UANVYsawdZYK3kicTrR5ZUPyqvpxdoG mFC/wSqnWH+5OLQAXlmMPljIPO/LXH5XvsdYwGxtI6ytXbKvmTvLe1lwJ70Qyh3n 0t/mE6eDwWWluMd4t6mS4JDADQmBQZkaAyXZPg1VerhtFfF+24dDTWZAdrmcKz/g w+XdMHwzMYv2vV0kRItO+T5AHO6xVbcEvZvfdKPG7lFGxKlfW5DNC7Nft6SPvb1t CaFPDX5C42VsfTpIS39ccp3WXhU9ST8+g0URXV2WocWkoqu8Dilc8lVQNA3U/SLp weD1a8MHrEO/Q3ATqU4BT4SA1461clC0L2qWk7f0EBpnb5yd5z+Y50JYbTWYXAw2 eGYOdXrfersvcyqxiDJFDXFOsk2u9qoIpIWY4zrS2Hqhb8Z5gtir0fJsKw6NEMis JW6c/HbUTjClXcrhzCRv8uiBKhYg0HPHM4xql5c5x19YD8w//kdw73VxbxcvTw+X Qb3JrpAWvyDccgRQdVzuP1uF8+VbH0jDirZ29OqchDu7DiDI210fJuHM7bXCvIHe iqXX6baE4x6ZMkGkTOcCftkJ3uaLajbmXiCPDPOCEIB31u34jP3t9uF/dYgJ9wzd q+kJDKB2eGiTemAu/V5OJ2tfhUXzyXahnuGISQQYEQIACQUCRkjw1wIbDAAKCRDJ R1AOqBB7fe9tAKCmTDtC+uJUBQBND6fInN81HmBG9gCfYIklOfb65+opZqmrahQA 5v2kUzY= =bvoL -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: DIS: test
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 17:03 -0500, Pavitra wrote: > Testing PGP/MIME for readability. What's your public key? -- ais523
Re: DIS: test
Pavitra wrote: > Testing PGP/MIME for readability. It looks the same as woggle's messages to me. I seem to remember that I stopped using GPG with Agora because someone complained that their MUA didn't strip out the machine-readable parts of the message properly. How does this look to everyone else? Is there a community consensus on the use of PGP/MIME &c.? Pavitra
Re: DIS: test
2009/6/2 Sean Hunt : > Sean Hunt wrote: >> Sorry guys, just doing a test that needs to go through the lists. >> Apologies for spam. > This is another test; sorry again for spam. > i uh object
Re: DIS: test
Sean Hunt wrote: > Sorry guys, just doing a test that needs to go through the lists. > Apologies for spam. This is another test; sorry again for spam.
Re: DIS: Test
#P [EMAIL PROTECTED] #S 6 #D 3 #R 1 #L 1 #C This is a test, I promise. #T This is a test, I promise.
Re: DIS: Test
On 9 Dec 2008, at 23:35, Sgeo wrote: #P agora-discussion@agoranomic.org #S 6 #D 3 #R 1 #L 1 #C This is a test, I promise. #T This is a test, I promise. Next time to the proper dice forum.
Re: DIS: Test
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > #P agora-discussion@agoranomic.org > #S 6 > #D 3 > #R 1 > #L 1 > #C This is a test, I promise. > #T This is a test, I promise. > Well, that failed pretty hard.
Re: DIS: test
Pavitra wrote: This is a test message. That looked like a real message to me. -- -- 0x44;
Re: DIS: Test...
On Jun 12, 2007, at 1:22 AM, Zefram wrote: Benjamin Schultz wrote: The last message went out twice, does this one double up? I have received at most one copy of each of your messages. -zefram I think I figured out my problem -- I was still double-subscribed. - Benjamin Schultz KE3OM OscarMeyr
Re: DIS: Test...
Benjamin Schultz wrote: >The last message went out twice, does this one double up? I have received at most one copy of each of your messages. -zefram