[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from danie...@openoffice.org Fri May 28 14:00:20 + 2010 --- I often have to analyze more than 100k records, the limit should be at least 1 million (without any restrictions on grafics, pivots etc.). To be more future- proof it would be wise to have either no limit or a very high one (e.g. billion, 2^30) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|STARTED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from e...@openoffice.org Fri May 28 16:48:18 + 2010 --- After a few fixes I activated 1M (1048576) rows in CWS koheirowlimitperf. You can observe the progress and possible integration date of CWS koheirowlimitperf at http://tools.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Path=DEV300%2Fkoheirowlimitperf - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User gbpacheco changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc,|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc, |camillem,er,jeongkyu,jondo|camillem,er,gbpacheco,jeon |,jrahemipour,kami_,kohei,k|gkyu,jondo,jrahemipour,kam |palagin,matthiasbasler,mwe|i_,kohei,kpalagin,matthias |xler,norbert2,nsaa,okapi12|basler,mwexler,norbert2,ns |53,olithered,pagalmes'|aa,okapi1253,olithered,pag | |almes' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User jeongkyu changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc,|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc, |camillem,er,jondo,jrahemip|camillem,er,jeongkyu,jondo |our,kami_,kohei,kpalagin,m|,jrahemipour,kami_,kohei,k |atthiasbasler,mwexler,norb|palagin,matthiasbasler,mwe |ert2,nsaa,okapi1253,olithe|xler,norbert2,nsaa,okapi12 |red,pagalmes' |53,olithered,pagalmes' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User olithered changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc,|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc, |camillem,er,jondo,jrahemip|camillem,er,jondo,jrahemip |our,kami_,kohei,kpalagin,m|our,kami_,kohei,kpalagin,m |atthiasbasler,mwexler,norb|atthiasbasler,mwexler,norb |ert2,nsaa,okapi1253,pagalm|ert2,nsaa,okapi1253,olithe |es' |red,pagalmes' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User kohei changed the following: What|Old value |New value IssuesThisDependsOn|106249,106522 |106249,106522,109369 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 This issue depends on issue 109369, which changed state: What|Old value |New value Status|STARTED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from shawn...@openoffice.org Fri Feb 12 17:32:07 + 2010 --- Actually look at Gnumeric 1.9.14 you can right click on the tab and select resize, then you get a slider to change to whatever row or columns you need. This to me ( a non programmer ) seems to be a useful feature (implementation) of all this talked about request. Those that need a large number can change to it an accept the cost in performance and hardware requirements, those that don't need it don't need to select it. Being opensource software (assuming both gpl) could you not use methodologies they implemented to help solve the problem than try reinvent then here? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User camillem changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc,|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc, |er,jondo,jrahemipour,kami_|camillem,er,jondo,jrahemip |,kohei,kpalagin,matthiasba|our,kami_,kohei,kpalagin,m |sler,mwexler,norbert2,nsaa|atthiasbasler,mwexler,norb |,okapi1253,pagalmes' |ert2,nsaa,okapi1253,pagalm | |es' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from mest...@openoffice.org Thu Dec 10 16:44:26 + 2009 --- Tmugan's comment is a reason why this should be a very high priority. Also for future, OOo should have a larger limit than Excel. I see that they are looking for 3.3, when is that due as we are still at 3.1.1? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Thu Dec 10 17:16:06 + 2009 --- My current plan is to put performance enhancements relevant to the row limit increase into 3.3 first, then resolve the following two outstanding issues. 1) formula performance enhancement. 2) drawing objects positioning issue. We may or may not resolve these by the release of 3.3; we'll try but no guarantee. But at least we'll lay the foundation for future row limit increase post-3.3 in case we don't make it for 3.3. This may be bad news for those waiting, but please do understand that this involves a large amount of work, so we need to do this in multiple phases. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from tmu...@openoffice.org Wed Dec 9 06:20:47 + 2009 --- This limitation is being used as a means to justify our corporate migration to Office 2007. We are increasingly dealing with larger datasets and the extra rows and columns of Excel 2007 is an attractive feature for our users. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User matthiasbasler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc,|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc, |er,jondo,jrahemipour,kami_|er,jondo,jrahemipour,kami_ |,kohei,kpalagin,mwexler,no|,kohei,kpalagin,matthiasba |rbert2,nsaa,okapi1253,paga|sler,mwexler,norbert2,nsaa |lmes' |,okapi1253,pagalmes' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User kohei changed the following: What|Old value |New value IssuesThisDependsOn|106249|106249,106522 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from mest...@openoffice.org Mon Oct 26 19:27:32 + 2009 --- bobharvey, you are correct to some aspects. Many users that have issues don't post or complain, they just go back to MSO. At present, we are just moving to the latest version of MSO (at least those that can stand the ribbon) so many have not seen the row limits. I have run into row limits when importing data from trials that I want to process and do calculations on. Calc has limits but I have found ways of working around these with different tools. As for comparison to WP/Quatro Pro/Lotus, it is interesting. I don't see many installations of these anymore. I do see the odd one though. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from bobhar...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 24 08:10:07 + 2009 --- I have been reading the comments, and there is something remarkable about it all, that might make it worth forking this matter. The real-life examples given are all about data lists, not calculation. The world has, for want of a better application, used spreadsheets to handle what should be in databases. None of these, presumably, require hyperbolic trig functions or regression (for example) The WP-spreadhseet-graphic-database paradigm for integrated suites appears to be fundamentally unaltered since the 1980s and 1-2-3. If huge tranches of computing users are bending the purpose of the spreadsheet to do something they cannot otherwise do, then perhaps it is time to invent something else. We no longer use steam engines on railways, so why are we still using a mathematical tool to sort and display data? It is, at the very least, a damning indictment of database applications. But it is also an opportunity to come up with a new type of application that does what people actually want to do. Why can't Mr Steelhoof's clients open the list in Base? what does it /not/ do that they can do in a spreadsheet? And, therefore, Why does Base not do that? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from riesl...@openoffice.org Sat Oct 24 10:31:35 + 2009 --- bobharvey: as I noted in my earlier comment of Sat Mar 22 2008, OpenOffice 2.1 Base uses Calc as a helper application for the purpose of importing data in the form of tab-delimited text. That is why Mr Steelhoof's clients can't open the list in Base. The Issue 30215 developers are working very hard to fix this. Let's give them our full support. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User kohei changed the following: What|Old value |New value IssuesThisDependsOn| |106249 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from steelh...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 23 00:57:22 + 2009 --- Here is a reality check. I just pulled up a list from the IRS. (October 22, 2009) here is where the 64k limit snipped the list... ** Beet Street Fort Collins CO The list does go to the letter Z I cannot let OO lose on common folk that cannot parse a file to make it work. Can YOU ? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from norbe...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 16 07:50:18 + 2009 --- @kohei: Are you working on this issue? Will your patch be integrated into OOo or only into go-oo? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from norbe...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 16 07:51:54 + 2009 --- What about performance problems? Are they already solved? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 16 20:06:23 + 2009 --- @norbert2: My plan is to upstream my patches from go-oo to the upstream version, and I have created a cws for this (koheirowlimitperf). I haven't done much there so far because of other priorities, but I'm trying to get this done in time for 3.3 upstream. What about performance problems? Are they already solved? I've taken care of the major ones we've discovered, so that editing regular sized documents (i.e. documents with rows less than the old limit of 64K) will not feel sluggish. But I doubt I've taken care of all potential performance problems. This will be an on-going process, and having my work integrated will not be the end of it. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from jo...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 13:38:51 + 2009 --- My company are currently using Excel 2000/2003 and the row limits are becoming more of any issue when working with third parties. They are keen to upgrade to Excel 2007 for obvious reasons, but I'm try to hold them off in the hope that OpenOffice/StarOffice will increase the row limits in Calc, do we have any idea of when this is likely to be? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Thu Oct 15 13:48:32 + 2009 --- My tentative target currently is 3.3. There is still an unresolved issue of the resolution of the positioning of drawing objects (e.g. notes at higher rows get placed slightly off, as much as one cell height off). Whether or not that will be a show stopper for this will need to be decided. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User kohei changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|OOo 3.x |OOo 3.3 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User hotbbq changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc,|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc, |er,hotbbq,jondo,jrahemipou|er,jondo,jrahemipour,kami_ |r,kami_,kohei,kpalagin,mwe|,kohei,kpalagin,mwexler,no |xler,norbert2,nsaa,okapi12|rbert2,nsaa,okapi1253,paga |53,pagalmes' |lmes' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User bijugc changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'aceman_ooo,andr55,er,hotb|'aceman_ooo,andr55,bijugc, |bq,jondo,jrahemipour,kami_|er,hotbbq,jondo,jrahemipou |,kohei,kpalagin,mwexler,no|r,kami_,kohei,kpalagin,mwe |rbert2,nsaa,okapi1253,paga|xler,norbert2,nsaa,okapi12 |lmes' |53,pagalmes' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from westl...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 3 15:31:21 + 2009 --- I have been using open office at home for some time. I didn't hesitate to bring it into work when I upgraded the computers however... I work in a cemetery the calc sheet is used for recording names, burial dates, and burial plots. This is an ongoing sheet that is being added to daily. It currently holds 40,000 plus rows and is due to expand. I find the program to be slow to load, taking nearly a two full minutes, adding to it is slow, as it hesitates for a minute before suddenly bringing up what was typed, and resaving after adding to it is a long process. I thought about splitting the sheet but that would make looking up the names upon request a little difficult as some families have members in the A lists and some in the W lists. If this program has row limits on top of the slow lagging response time then it will be nessicary for me to convert back to microsoft to meet the needs at work. The lag and the limits will o doubt limit open office to home use only. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from westl...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 3 15:31:30 + 2009 --- I have been using open office at home for some time. I didn't hesitate to bring it into work when I upgraded the computers however... I work in a cemetery the calc sheet is used for recording names, burial dates, and burial plots. This is an ongoing sheet that is being added to daily. It currently holds 40,000 plus rows and is due to expand. I find the program to be slow to load, taking nearly a two full minutes, adding to it is slow, as it hesitates for a minute before suddenly bringing up what was typed, and resaving after adding to it is a long process. I thought about splitting the sheet but that would make looking up the names upon request a little difficult as some families have members in the A lists and some in the W lists. If this program has row limits on top of the slow lagging response time then it will be nessicary for me to convert back to microsoft to meet the needs at work. The lag and the limits will no doubt limit open office to home use only. --- Additional comments from westl...@openoffice.org Thu Sep 3 15:31:32 + 2009 --- I have been using open office at home for some time. I didn't hesitate to bring it into work when I upgraded the computers however... I work in a cemetery the calc sheet is used for recording names, burial dates, and burial plots. This is an ongoing sheet that is being added to daily. It currently holds 40,000 plus rows and is due to expand. I find the program to be slow to load, taking nearly a two full minutes, adding to it is slow, as it hesitates for a minute before suddenly bringing up what was typed, and resaving after adding to it is a long process. I thought about splitting the sheet but that would make looking up the names upon request a little difficult as some families have members in the A lists and some in the W lists. If this program has row limits on top of the slow lagging response time then it will be nessicary for me to convert back to microsoft to meet the needs at work. The lag and the limits will no doubt limit open office to home use only. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 10 20:07:13 + 2009 --- How do you go about giving this enhancement more priority or having main developers give it more attention? Unfortunately I'm not the right person to answer that question, since I'm just a lowly external contributor with no power in the project. However, I can try to create a cws and commit my changes to it, and lobby for its inclusion. It's not entirely finished, and I was hoping to have the code mature a bit. But since I have recently been accused (wrongly I might add) of holding back my code from the upstream inclusion, I will start committing my incomplete changes, and hope for the best. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User kohei changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|nn|kohei --- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 10 20:10:02 + 2009 --- I'll commit my changes to kohei03 cws once I'm able to create it there. I have trouble creating new CWS'es at the moment. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User kohei changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |STARTED --- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Wed Jun 10 20:11:02 + 2009 --- . - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from murdock1...@openoffice.org Tue May 19 09:00:07 + 2009 --- Hello Kohei, Thank you for your effort and the feedback. I was reading through all the comments and only yours had any information about how this is issue is developing. Maybe there are things that can influence this issues current standing? How do you go about giving this enhancement more priority or having main developers give it more attention? Thanks, Elliot - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from murdock1...@openoffice.org Mon May 18 21:51:03 + 2009 --- Besides having a personal use for a spreadsheet that allows more than 64K rows, it seems only obvious that as computers become more powerful, software should reflect the capabilities of current hardware. I mean no animosity, but staying at a 64K limit for even older computers is akin to using a 16bit operating system for a 64bit processor. Sure, the 16bit OS will work, but it is also a fine waste of resources. If not for any other reason, when we are shelling out cash for more powerful hardware, it is only natural that software should accommodate it. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Mon May 18 22:11:33 + 2009 --- Ok, just to let everyone know, I've been working on increasing the row size limit to match that of Excel 2007. Along the way, I've discovered tons of serious performance issues, many of which have been resolved, but some are still outstanding. No one is denying the importance of row limit increase, but not many people seem to realize the scope of work that will be involved to increase the row limit without substantial performance problems. Just to give you an example, right after I increased the row limit to 1048576, setting a page style started to take 70 seconds, saving a small-ish ods document went into an infinite loop, switching active sheet started to take 10 minutes, and on and on. These are the type of the performance problems that I mentioned would happen. What I'm trying to say is, you don't need to try to convince us of the need. We are convinced. It's just that it will take efforts to make it happen without making Calc a totally useless piece of junk. Just FYI... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User aceman_ooo changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'andr55,er,hotbbq,jondo,jr|'aceman_ooo,andr55,er,hotb |ahemipour,kami_,kohei,kpal|bq,jondo,jrahemipour,kami_ |agin,mwexler,norbert2,nsaa|,kohei,kpalagin,mwexler,no |,okapi1253,pagalmes' |rbert2,nsaa,okapi1253,paga | |lmes' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from omb...@openoffice.org Wed Apr 15 02:22:27 + 2009 --- Hi, i'm a system analyst working at a +1000 employee company and i confirm the need for +64K rows. It is common practice in this company to use spreadsheets with customer billing information that comprises +100 rows. And i cannot just tell the users you have to use a database not a spreadsheet for that. They will simply answer: Office 2007 handle the data without problems, OpenOffice is *limited* , so we cannot use OO in this company. Please, rethink the priority of this issue. Thank you very much. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from rt...@openoffice.org Thu Apr 9 08:25:09 + 2009 --- ***Not inttegrated in Featurelist, releasenote or the newest OOo-dev 3.2.0 300m44*** Bad news: it seems like this usefull feature will still not be avaible to the Oo Comunity. The next version will be released in less than 50 Days, and the unlimted Rows are still not listed in any featurelist. So there will be only one solution if you need an easy-to-use spreadsheet with lot of rows: learn to use and learn to love ribbons. It seems as Open Source wount give us this feature in the next future... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from rt...@openoffice.org Tue Mar 17 14:02:01 + 2009 --- Solution only for developer. Hi there, i've been contacted and told, that -You realy need to recompile the sources to use the new rowlimit, and this isn't funny if you don't eat Bits for Breakfast -there will be soon a 3.1 beta version with this patch integrated, downloadable as executables for Guys like me (i only eat bytes ,not bits for breakfast). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from rt...@openoffice.org Sun Mar 15 18:33:42 + 2009 --- Solution! Solution! Solution? The Diff-file seems like the Fileversion of the known hack. pls don't laugh about me, but: how do i use the Diff-File? do i need to recompile the sources? I am a user of OO (poorly, i know...), not a programmer. is there a how-to for using this (or other) diff-files? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from lszy...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 12 13:24:55 + 2009 --- Hello, It seems as this is an issue for a lot of people. A lot of duplicate bugs have been raised, and there seem to be a hack to make this happen. I propose that this bug be narrowed down to: Choice 1: 2 million rows (2^21) Choice 2: 1024 x 65536 ~ 67 million (Almost no limit. This should satisfy any csv import). Beyond that a performance analysis would need to be done to see if its feasible. I vote for choice 2. Is that technically possible? Can an OpenOffice Developer confirm this is doable and a time frame this would take him/her? If we are talking about one variable change can somebody knowledgeable on a topic submit a patch to this ticket. I appreciate your contributions. Thank you. Lucas - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User kohei changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |60899) this is the patch i | |n go-oo --- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 12 13:32:23 + 2009 --- Created an attachment (id=60899) this is the patch in go-oo - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from ko...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 12 13:38:59 + 2009 --- As is already mentioned, increasing the row limit itself is very simple (as the patch shows). In go-oo the row limit has already been increased partly as an experiment to identify the real-world problems with this change, and also to properly prioritize those problems. BTW I have already seen some performance problems when importing a large xlsx file. I anticipate other problems as we go along. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from dc...@openoffice.org Thu Mar 12 20:43:44 + 2009 --- The last time I wanted to work with large files, it was 8M rows. So the bigger the better. I wanted to do some statistical analysis as a prelude to data mining. Performance in terms of user responsiveness is not so big an issue; I expect it to take awhile to load, run or do lots of other things when there are that many rows. Maybe some quantification of performance problems would be in order. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from rt...@openoffice.org Mon Mar 9 15:42:23 + 2009 --- Usage in Reality? -searching Items in your ERP with wrong fields -searching postings in your ERP for wrong Values -analysing Item-movements (a quick BI) -analysing your customers, ledger Entrys All this types of data are mostly much more than 65K of lines. And all of them hold the secret, that you don't know exactly what you are searching for. There has to be something other than the others. Shurely, you could use BI and Databases and Reportsystems and Analyzingtools, but mostly you can speed up your job just by STRG+A,STRG+C,STRG+V in your Spreadsheet, do one or to re-sorts, or do an Autofilter, or do something very quickly, very easy, and: only this one time. Next Time you need another quick way to do your Job. And if you are just a accounter or controler, you dont like to invest much money for a job you cant describe before it is present, and you dont like to learn a database without any suggestion about the need. PLs pls pls kill this rowlimit, or make it at least configurable ( [_] 65 K combatible to all Excel [_] 1 Mio compatible to Excel 2007 [_] 2 Mio combatible to yourself and your Family with OO3 [_] Unlimited combatible to nothing and dame slow, but we warned you i think it would help the mass of the people more to do their Job fast with a simple, well-known tool, even if this tool slows down a bit, and the OoTeam can word on speed up Calc where it needs to be speed up (the forum will tell!!), instead of can't do the Job, but you can't do it very fast... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from lukef...@openoffice.org Tue Feb 17 08:41:43 + 2009 --- i wish Oo3.1 abandon row limits and column limits which seems an outdated feature - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from dc...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 12 14:56:34 + 2009 --- Yes, please! As many people have noted, spreadsheets can be useful far beyond traditional accounting. At least in principle, since all the computational power needed is available. But an arbitrary row (or column) limit simply prevents these applications from working. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from jaap...@openoffice.org Wed Feb 11 22:24:34 + 2009 --- More columns would make Calc a good replacement for SPSS in my case. My (market research) datasets are usually 5-15k columns wide. My colleagues are all raving about Excel 2007 being able to handle 16k columns; I hope Calc can follow suit soon. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from norbe...@openoffice.org Thu Feb 12 07:59:08 + 2009 --- Since the second OOo3 release is out now and this issue is nearly five years old now I think it is time to specify an explicit target. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User jrahemipour changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'andr55,er,hotbbq,jondo,ka|'andr55,er,hotbbq,jondo,jr |mi_,kohei,kpalagin,mwexler|ahemipour,kami_,kohei,kpal |,norbert2,nsaa,okapi1253,p|agin,mwexler,norbert2,nsaa |agalmes' |,okapi1253,pagalmes' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User andr55 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'er,hotbbq,jondo,kami_,koh|'andr55,er,hotbbq,jondo,ka |ei,kpalagin,mwexler,norber|mi_,kohei,kpalagin,mwexler |t2,nsaa,okapi1253,pagalmes|,norbert2,nsaa,okapi1253,p |' |agalmes' --- Additional comments from and...@openoffice.org Mon Jan 12 02:25:38 + 2009 --- Personally I'd like dynamic row and column sizes, perhaps defaulting to 256 columns and 32k rows, if that would save any space. In the transition from the old Openoffice 1 format to Openoffice 2 format, I noticed that smaller spreadsheets generally doubled in size. If this was due to doubling the number of rows, it would be advantageous to keep the default at 32k rows for the generally more common smaller files. (Often I use very small spreadsheets instead of text files for organizing information.) At the same time, unlimited dynamic sizes would accomodate the very large spreadsheets that I and many others sometimes need. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from dridg...@openoffice.org Tue Dec 30 03:29:08 + 2008 --- *** Issue 96784 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@sc.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 21 16:47:34 + 2008 --- Please increase row limit to match excel 2007 (at least). Why can't I open my list of 70k records as a spreadsheet? Its 2008 people, and we are still working with computer limits from what 1997? Earlier? Please. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 24 11:06:01 + 2008 --- Another need for more than 65k rows is in the university sector. I'm an academic (science field) working with large datasets all the time and the row limit is a constant problem for me and my colleagues and students. If Calc had unlimited rows I could persuade most of my students to start using it (as opposed to shelling out for MSO) and grow the OOo user base. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User mwexler changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'er,hotbbq,jondo,kami_,koh|'er,hotbbq,jondo,kami_,koh |ei,kpalagin,norbert2,nsaa,|ei,kpalagin,mwexler,norber |okapi1253,pagalmes' |t2,nsaa,okapi1253,pagalmes | |' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 2 15:53:31 + 2008 --- A few examples when over 65K would be needed - Quick self analysis (and charting) of a big amount of electronically produced data (does everyone have to be a programmer to be able to do it? No.) - Phone bill detail (CDR) analysis (for a company, the live case) - - CDR analysis for small VOIP provider - who don't yet have money for a billing (Very live case even for a period of 1 year after startup for some cell-phone companies in developing world - personaly have seen that case) - Internet traffic bill details analysis (for home user) for correctness comparision (yes, details are BIG) and applies to any users who is able to get an internet traffic details from it's ISP. - As For a programmer - quick charting the big amount of different electronically produced data - to not have to learn GNUPLOT or similar soft. 5 minutes thought. And sure who deal with finances and other types of businesses - have their examples too. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 4 11:50:00 + 2008 --- I made the original suggestion partly because I believed it to be possible. Back in about 1985 I was using a cluster of VAX computers for software cross- development, and to increase usefulness obtained a spreadsheet from one of the DECUS user-supported tapes. That had unlimited numbers of rows and columns, and used a sparse matrix technique of double-linked lists to store the data. no doubt there would be problems saving in older microsoft and ooo formats, but a warning and a choice of saving multiple sheets would cover that. The unlimited spreadsheet is an idea whose time has come. As, indeed, has a simple syntax for relative cell references to allow things like Starting at H2048, 12,000 rows and 8,000 columns - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 3 07:24:34 + 2008 --- I see two key comments in previous notes here. why [do] we need a row limit at all? and The concern for increased sheet size is always with the performance. But I assume that even with the current hard limits, Calc will keep track of the highest row/col/sheet used (if it doesn't, it should). In which case a permitted unlimited size becomes a non-issue, at least as regards performance because Calc should only be calculating for non-empty cells. Then if a user needs a large spreadsheet and is prepared to put up with correspondingly slow performance, that should be his choice; better that than making some large tasks totally impossible for some users. Fixed limits is usually a result of hard-coded static arrays. Surely we have better techniques these days? There's a lot to be said for the old 0, 1, infinity rule! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 4 08:31:20 + 2008 --- Performance and internal implementation of arrays aren't the only issues. The current drawing layer implementation doesn't allow coordinates that far down, and already at its current limits it positions objects with an error offset. Going for a million rows or so definitely needs a new drawing layer implementation, which is on its way anyway, but will take its time. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 4 10:22:51 + 2008 --- I did a quick test, and A1:XFD1048576 seems works well. After these coords the calculation is perfect. I also saw problem with XFD1048576 cell only. I will build another version with these maximized coords, and come back the findings soon. * It seems increasing row nomber is not affect the performance so much (but here we need more testing) Incerasing cols degragate the performance more. IHMO increasing number of rows is more important than increasing cols. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 3 17:05:59 + 2008 --- Man, I was so excited that I missed the 'x' in my hopes. :) I guess I will just have to wait and hope that people don't start going to the latest MS Office. I was hoping that with the change seeming so easy with changing the MAXCOLCOUNT_DEFINE working for some, I had my hopes up. Any increase is better. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User kami_ changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'er,hotbbq,jondo,kami_,kpa|'er,hotbbq,jondo,kami_,koh |lagin,norbert2,nsaa,okapi1|ei,kpalagin,norbert2,nsaa, |253,pagalmes' |okapi1253,pagalmes' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 3 17:43:10 + 2008 --- I think we should follow MSO here so we have to increase the available rows/columns. Kohei what is your opinion about it? How hard to implement it? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 3 23:43:59 + 2008 --- Physically increasing the row and column sizes are as simple as changing the magic numbers in one file. The concern for increased sheet size is always with the performance. A larger sheet means more data to fill, which in turn means sorting a maxed out data gets slower, copy paste gets slower because of the more expensive re-calculation operation etc. So, we need to make sure that Calc is up for handling that large size of data before increasing the maximum size. You need to buy a larger air conditioning unit when you increase the size of your house. The same principle. :-) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 3 23:46:25 + 2008 --- Also, the reason why the maximum sizes are static is because currently the sheets are implemented using static size arrays. We would need to switch to using dynamically sized arrays to make the sheet size configurable. It's possible to do it in theory, but I have no idea how much work would be involved to make that happen in practice. (maybe one of those days...) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 23 15:10:40 + 2008 --- Seeing that the target is now 3.0, I will be looking at testing 3.0 sooner than later. This is good news. I have enough data that requires many more rows than in OOo or previous to 2007 excel. I may also be able to get other to use OOo sooner because of this. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 23 16:06:14 + 2008 --- mestech, please don't start any false rumors. Target for this is 3.x, not 3.0. 3.0 will have 1024 x 65536, like the beta version. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User fl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|--- |OOo 3.x --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 22 08:31:45 + 2008 --- This issue is important and listed on the quarterly review for Calc: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/2008_Q2_Review_of_Spreadsheet_Project Therefore adjusting target to 3.x. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 17 17:02:40 + 2008 --- nsaa, thank you for that link to hack the number of columns! Just changing MAXCOLCOUNT_DEFINE in sc/inc/address.hxx is good enough for me as I export to statistical software after doing some data integrity checking anyway. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 13 10:17:56 + 2008 --- See http://sc.openoffice.org/row-limit.html for an explanation - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 13 10:54:08 + 2008 --- And this one http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Calc/hacks/number_of_rows - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 11 19:22:36 + 2008 --- Please, please add support for additional columns. I occasionally have data (not suitable for a database) that requires more than 1024, so am unable to use OOo. Also, Excel has 16,384 (2^14) columns and 1,048,576 (2^20) rows. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa730921.aspx OOo needs at least as many as Excel, not just for compatibility's sake, but also in order to be useful to those of us who need that many columns in a spreadsheet format. Could someone please explain the technical limitations of these two improvements? Why is an indefinite number (hardware resource limited) of columns and rows impossible? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 30 15:37:25 + 2008 --- i created an account just so i could vote. I'm surprised, free software is usually ahead of the curve, but not this time. i have logs that i load into a database, and if there is a problem with the load, i need to be able to open the file and examine the offending record which is often grater than row 64k. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 22 17:48:44 + 2008 --- OpenOffice 2.1 Base uses Calc as a helper application for the purpose of importing data in the form of tab-delimited text. However, when I attempted to use Calc to load data regarding voters in Broward County, Florida (which has nearly 1 million voters), Calc failed with an error message indicating that it could only load 65,536 records (its design limit) and thus the rest were truncated. This makes OpenOffice Base unusable with respect to this or any other non-miniature database. Request that Calc be revised to eliminate the 65,536-record limitation, or that some other means be developed whereby Base can import and export tab-delimited text containing 1 million or more records. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 21 15:31:02 + 2008 --- Target milestone for this should be set to OOo 3.0, since Calc should support Microsoft's format OOXML. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User bobharvey changed the following: What|Old value |New value Priority|P5|P3 - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 25 23:31:32 + 2008 --- Upgrade the Priority (http://www.openoffice.org/scdocs/ddIssues_EnterModify.html#priority) to 3. The number of columns/rows should at least match Excel 2007, and should be fixed as sone as possible. If Calc can't read Excel 2007 files it will be devasting. If it's possible to make the number of columns and rows dynamic (only memory or other hardware limits) this will be great ... - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 15 15:50:23 + 2008 --- This issue is related to the increase in the number of columns to compete/surpass other applications. http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86049 Should be looked at together as far as I am concerned. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 15 09:45:16 + 2008 --- I work in a bank as an EDP responsible. In this bank, all the PC's have OOo installed and in 5/6 (of 150 workstations) there is installed also MSOffice (because we receive from Istitutional Offices MS-Office files, usally with macros). I often have problems in OOCalc for the reason of this issue (max numbers of columns and rows). I think OOcalc should have AT LEAST the number of columns and rows of the last version of MSOffice for this reasons: 1) often the analyze of data requires the import (usally CSV files) which are longer than 65536 rows; 2) often this CSV have to be exported to MSOffice; 3) I also receive xls files with more tham 65536 rows. So I think it should be very nice if we can have this request to be developed. Greeting. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 3 10:52:27 + 2008 --- I had made some posts on the forum before I found this issue. I think the row limit needs to be increased. I have wanted to move to open office calc for a while but the row limit has prevented this. I work with large amounts of product data and currently use Excel 2007 to manipulate the data in a spreadsheet. As a comment above mentioned the priority of this should be raised since Open Office is fast getting left behind by Excel and will require the new 1 million row limit if it is to be compatible with Excel 2007 files. I think this could be a key feature of Calc if it had no (or a very large) limit on rows and columns. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User kami_ changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'er,hotbbq,jondo,kpalagin,|'er,hotbbq,jondo,kami_,kpa |norbert2,nsaa,okapi1253,pa|lagin,norbert2,nsaa,okapi1 |galmes' |253,pagalmes' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 6 09:09:15 + 2007 --- The large data sets I work with are manipulated with PERL scripts and stored in a database or large flat files. Reviews of large subsets are facilitated using a spreadsheet, and often this requires more than 256 columns. This allows easy perusal and provides facilities for further analyses and visualization (graphs) that would otherwise require sophisticated custom script solutions. We recently purchased WordPerfect Office X3 to get Quattro Pro because all other spreadsheets we then had access to (Excel, OOo, Gnumeric (without recompile)) had stuck with the archaic 256-column limit. I could deal with extracting smaller subsets, transforming rows/columns, etc., but why should it be that hard? Users often employ spreadsheets as formatting tools, and reviewing a large layout of rows columns shouldn't be such a technical challenge today. As mentioned, with the Excel 2007 boost to near Quattro Pro limits, everyone else will now need to follow. Who will take the lead from Quattro Pro? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 5 13:51:28 + 2007 --- hotbbq: use scilab.org instead of matlab! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 5 12:24:39 + 2007 --- Arbitrary row/column limits would be a boon for the project I'm working on at the office. Currently we are forced to use Matlab for doing analysis on large sets of numbers, which works, but adds significant cost (training new users, licenses, etc). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User norbert2 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'er,jondo,kpalagin,norbert|'er,hotbbq,jondo,kpalagin, |2,nsaa,okapi1253,pagalmes'|norbert2,nsaa,okapi1253,pa | |galmes' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 16 21:17:06 + 2007 --- PLEASE raise the limit on the number of rows! The first poster got it right. The only reason this problem doesn't affect many people is because everyone has conformed to the crippled tradition of Excel. Being just as broken as Excel used to be doesn't seem to be a great selling point to me. 1M rows is somewhat less broken, but the right answer is no limit beyond VM space. I am perfectly comfortable writing SQL, and prefer a database for some tasks like persistent storage. But for a quick analysis of my latest 60M-row dataset I don't want to always have to design a schema, import the data, transform it and then do the analysis. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User pagalmes changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'er,jondo,kpalagin,norbert|'er,jondo,kpalagin,norbert |2,nsaa,okapi1253' |2,nsaa,okapi1253,pagalmes' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 7 16:12:31 + 2007 --- Should not this issue get a priority P3 since it will be impossible to open up Excel 2007 files if this issue isn't fixed? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User norbert2 changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'er,jondo,kpalagin,nsaa,ok|'er,jondo,kpalagin,norbert |api1253' |2,nsaa,okapi1253' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 10 14:56:40 + 2007 --- I completely agree with the comments above, as OOo has real benefits when compared to Excel but the drag a lagging row limit creates is striking. Why would M$ invest in such a feature, if everybody would just use a database? ;-) (Is this a point at all?!) I would prefer a database myself (which could be related to the fact that I am capable of writing SQL) and I don't tell users what they should use without a coercive (technical) reason, which is not given in the concrete discussion. chris - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 7 07:55:56 + 2007 --- Excel 2007: 1048576 rows by 16384 columns References http://blogs.msdn.com/excel/archive/2005/09/23/473185.aspx the Excel 12 grid will be 1,048,576 rows by 16,384 columns. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa730921.aspx#Office2007excelPerf_BigGridIncreasedLimitsExcel The Excel 2007 Big Grid increases the maximum number of rows per worksheet from 65,536 to over 1 million, and the number of columns from 256 (IV) to 16,384 (XFD). - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User nsaa changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'er,jondo,kpalagin,okapi12|'er,jondo,kpalagin,nsaa,ok |53' |api1253' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 31 12:42:08 + 2007 --- *** Issue 65773 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 30 19:59:38 + 2007 --- I just voted on this issue as it is important to me. In science we are getting more detailed data and this means increased data points to be processed. Now I have to break my data points into multiple work sheets because of the row limits. It would be nice to be able to load my data set into a single work sheet. I think OpenOffice needs to exceed Excel in this ability. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 12 15:20:29 + 2007 --- More columns and rows are essential for the research project I'm involved in (due to the large amount of data). Because it is carried out in developing countries it would be great if Calc could be used - currently we are dependent on SPSS for managing the data and this is very expensive software. I really hope this will be added in a future version. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 25 15:23:55 + 2007 --- *** Issue 31612 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 20 08:45:18 + 2007 --- Not just rows, columns too. Don't just think vertically, think laterally. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User njglin changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed| |1 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 16 17:44:23 + 2007 --- *** Issue 30215 has been confirmed by votes. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Feb 14 14:43:36 + 2007 --- *** Issue 74511 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User jondo changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'er,kpalagin,okapi1253' |'er,jondo,kpalagin,okapi12 | |53' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 20 03:16:25 -0800 2007 --- OOo is lagging behind Excel 2007, which allows about 1 million (2^20) rows. (I am afraid this could be Excel's unique selling point in my company.) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[sc-issues] [Issue 30215] Further thoughts on row li mits
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=30215 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'okapi1253' |'er,okapi1253' - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
