Re: Development Question
Group Type of 'None' does not make a group a permission group. It becomes only a notification type of a group. So yes that was your problem. Joe _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Simon Ellis Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:21 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Development Question Think I've found the problem.. On the Group form the group type was set as none, where as in DEV it was set as Change, everything else was the same. Flicking between the two allowed the panel tab to become visible.. Now noted for when I release to staging and prod.. Cheers Simon From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Thad Esser Sent: Wednesday, 22 January 2014 2:25 p.m. To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Development Question ** Simon, Are the Group IDs on the Group form for the Company in question the same between your Dev and Test environments? Thad On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Simon Ellis simon.el...@telecom.co.nz wrote: Seemed to have stumped myself In a multi tenated solution i've created a new panel on the HPD:Help Desk form, added a panel holder and additional panels within that. The new panel is only visible to members of one company. The People records have the Company listed in the Access Restictions box of there people record. To establish the permissions for this tab, I mapped a role to a group and through DEV studio set permissions for the Panel so that role/group only have access. In our DEV environment where i developed this, it works like a dream, if you have the company listed in your people record under access restrictions no problem you can view the tab and you can log and search for tickets for that company. If you don't you can't see the tab/panel and you can't log tickets for that company. When i've moved this through into our Test environment, users with the correct access restrictions can create and search tickets for this company but can't view the new tab/panel. As the administrator i can. Permissions of the form are identical. Can't fathom out if i've missed something out, done something in DEV that i've forgotten to move through any ideas? ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years
Development Question
Seemed to have stumped myself In a multi tenated solution i've created a new panel on the HPD:Help Desk form, added a panel holder and additional panels within that. The new panel is only visible to members of one company. The People records have the Company listed in the Access Restictions box of there people record. To establish the permissions for this tab, I mapped a role to a group and through DEV studio set permissions for the Panel so that role/group only have access. In our DEV environment where i developed this, it works like a dream, if you have the company listed in your people record under access restrictions no problem you can view the tab and you can log and search for tickets for that company. If you don't you can't see the tab/panel and you can't log tickets for that company. When i've moved this through into our Test environment, users with the correct access restrictions can create and search tickets for this company but can't view the new tab/panel. As the administrator i can. Permissions of the form are identical. Can't fathom out if i've missed something out, done something in DEV that i've forgotten to move through any ideas? ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years
Re: [EXTERNAL] Development Question
Simon: The only suggestion I'd have is to try resetting the access restriction for the user in your TEST environment, i.e. remove it, save the People record, then re-add it and resave the People record. I can't tell you the number of flaky little access-type problems I've solved doing that little dance with permissions and anything else that gives or removes access. Good luck! Natalie Stroud SAIC @ Sandia National Laboratories ARS-ITSM Reporting Specialist Albuquerque, NM USA nkst...@sandia.gov ITSM 7.6.04 SP2 – Windows 2003 – SQL Server 2008 -Original Message- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Simon Ellis Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:31 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: [EXTERNAL] Development Question Seemed to have stumped myself In a multi tenated solution i've created a new panel on the HPD:Help Desk form, added a panel holder and additional panels within that. The new panel is only visible to members of one company. The People records have the Company listed in the Access Restictions box of there people record. To establish the permissions for this tab, I mapped a role to a group and through DEV studio set permissions for the Panel so that role/group only have access. In our DEV environment where i developed this, it works like a dream, if you have the company listed in your people record under access restrictions no problem you can view the tab and you can log and search for tickets for that company. If you don't you can't see the tab/panel and you can't log tickets for that company. When i've moved this through into our Test environment, users with the correct access restrictions can create and search tickets for this company but can't view the new tab/panel. As the administrator i can. Permissions of the form are identical. Can't fathom out if i've missed something out, done something in DEV that i've forgotten to move through any ideas? ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years
Re: Development Question
Simon, Are the Group IDs on the Group form for the Company in question the same between your Dev and Test environments? Thad On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Simon Ellis simon.el...@telecom.co.nzwrote: Seemed to have stumped myself In a multi tenated solution i've created a new panel on the HPD:Help Desk form, added a panel holder and additional panels within that. The new panel is only visible to members of one company. The People records have the Company listed in the Access Restictions box of there people record. To establish the permissions for this tab, I mapped a role to a group and through DEV studio set permissions for the Panel so that role/group only have access. In our DEV environment where i developed this, it works like a dream, if you have the company listed in your people record under access restrictions no problem you can view the tab and you can log and search for tickets for that company. If you don't you can't see the tab/panel and you can't log tickets for that company. When i've moved this through into our Test environment, users with the correct access restrictions can create and search tickets for this company but can't view the new tab/panel. As the administrator i can. Permissions of the form are identical. Can't fathom out if i've missed something out, done something in DEV that i've forgotten to move through any ideas? ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years
Re: Development Question
Think I've found the problem On the Group form the group type was set as none, where as in DEV it was set as Change, everything else was the same. Flicking between the two allowed the panel tab to become visible Now noted for when I release to staging and prod Cheers Simon From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Thad Esser Sent: Wednesday, 22 January 2014 2:25 p.m. To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Development Question ** Simon, Are the Group IDs on the Group form for the Company in question the same between your Dev and Test environments? Thad On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Simon Ellis simon.el...@telecom.co.nzmailto:simon.el...@telecom.co.nz wrote: Seemed to have stumped myself In a multi tenated solution i've created a new panel on the HPD:Help Desk form, added a panel holder and additional panels within that. The new panel is only visible to members of one company. The People records have the Company listed in the Access Restictions box of there people record. To establish the permissions for this tab, I mapped a role to a group and through DEV studio set permissions for the Panel so that role/group only have access. In our DEV environment where i developed this, it works like a dream, if you have the company listed in your people record under access restrictions no problem you can view the tab and you can log and search for tickets for that company. If you don't you can't see the tab/panel and you can't log tickets for that company. When i've moved this through into our Test environment, users with the correct access restrictions can create and search tickets for this company but can't view the new tab/panel. As the administrator i can. Permissions of the form are identical. Can't fathom out if i've missed something out, done something in DEV that i've forgotten to move through any ideas? ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.orghttp://www.arslist.org Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years _ARSlist: Where the Answers Are and have been for 20 years_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years
Re: Development question
Hi,
If you walk your table, and then perform a service-call to the
details-records one at a time.
Whatever happens inside that service-call (a push-fields to the
details-record in this case), will be committed to the database before the
service-call exits.
This will then enable you to do a COLSUM(), or some such thing, on your
details-records after your table-walk has been completed.
The drawback is that the details-updates will be committed to the database
even though a later update should fail with an error...
Another drawback is that Doug Mueller has told me that if it works like
that, it is a bug, and should be fixed. But I have seen no evidence of
this being addressed in the 3 service packs released so far...
Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)
Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.
Can't use active links. The parameter can be changed from another form
using a push and active links won't be triggered.
Thanks!
El miércoles, 13 de junio de 2012, Joel Sender escribió:
**
Jose,
You might try it in stages;
**1. **An active link pushes the new Invoice value to all the
detail entries
**2. **A filter recalculates each detail’s value(s)
**3. **A second active link (higher exec order) recalculates (or
triggers filters to recalc) Invoice values from the detail entries.
HTH,
*Joel***
Joel Senderjdsen...@earthlink.net javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'jdsen...@earthlink.net');310.829.5552
** **
*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG');]
*On
Behalf Of *Jose Huerta
*Sent:* Monday, June 11, 2012 5:27 AM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG');
*Subject:* Development question
** **
** Hi listers,
** **
I have a question for developers. I've got a solution, but I want to
know
if there is a better option, since it doesn't satisfy me 100%.
** **
Here's the case (It's not really my case, but a simplified version of
it):
** **
I have one form: AAA:Invoices.
This form has a table field that shows related requests on
AAA:DetailLines.
** **
So each invoice in AAA:Invoices is related to several Detail Lines in
AAA:DetailLines.
** **
I have a field in AAA:Invoices that is a parameter used to compute the
value of the detail lines. I call it: InvoiceParameter.
I have a filter that when InvoiceParameter is changed, it propagates it
to
all related detail lines. When those lines are modified, they
automatically
(with filters) recalculate their value.
** **
I also have a total value field at AAA:Invoices that it is the sum of
the
detail lines. I want to keep it updated, so I thinked some options, but
concurrency makes the result going wrong.
** **
Summarizing the case: The objective is that when modifying the field
InvoiceParameter at an Invoice, it propagates to the detail lines,
recalculating its value, and returns to the invoice with the total as
the
sum of all detail lines.
** **
If I do it with a filter, the contents of the table at AAA:Invoice is
not
updated until the end of the transaction. So I can't see the new values.
And If I use parameter sending, only one of the detail lines, do
actually
change the value, the rest are lost, (beacuse concurrency).
** **
Using the override phase at PUSH actions, it overrides the ARS action,
but
not the SQL sending, that is sent at the end.
** **
** **
My solution is to have a filter at AAA:Invoice that propagates the
InvoiceParameter to the detail lines. Then the detail lines compute the
result and make a PUSH to the Invoice marking a flag field (so no
concurrency error is possible). Then an escalation executes at every
minute on marked invoices, that computes the total.
** **
I hate using escalations for complex computations. Do you know any other
way to achieve my objective without escalations?
Jose M. Huerta
Project Manager
Movil: 661 665 088
Telf.: 971 75 03 24
Fax: 971 75 07 94
http://www.sm2baleares.es/
SM2 Baleares S.A.
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_
--
Jose M. Huerta
Project Manager**
Movil: 661 665 088
Telf.: 971 75 03 24
Fax: 971 75 07 94
http://www.sm2baleares.es/
SM2 Baleares S.A.
C/Rita Levi
Edificio SM2 Parc Bit
07121 Palma de Mallorca
http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954
http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares
http
Re: Development question
Very happy until reading your last sentence :)
I can't provide a development based on a bug. If someday BMC solves it,
then my development will crash.
Thanks!
Jose M. Huerta
Project Manager**
Movil: 661 665 088
Telf.: 971 75 03 24
Fax: 971 75 07 94
http://www.sm2baleares.es/
SM2 Baleares S.A.
C/Rita Levi
Edificio SM2 Parc Bit
07121 Palma de Mallorca
http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954
http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares
http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares
La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es
confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea
leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje
por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos
que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del
mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de
inmediato.
P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es
necesario.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Misi Mladoniczky m...@rrr.se wrote:
Hi,
If you walk your table, and then perform a service-call to the
details-records one at a time.
Whatever happens inside that service-call (a push-fields to the
details-record in this case), will be committed to the database before the
service-call exits.
This will then enable you to do a COLSUM(), or some such thing, on your
details-records after your table-walk has been completed.
The drawback is that the details-updates will be committed to the database
even though a later update should fail with an error...
Another drawback is that Doug Mueller has told me that if it works like
that, it is a bug, and should be fixed. But I have seen no evidence of
this being addressed in the 3 service packs released so far...
Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)
Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.
Can't use active links. The parameter can be changed from another form
using a push and active links won't be triggered.
Thanks!
El miércoles, 13 de junio de 2012, Joel Sender escribió:
**
Jose,
You might try it in stages;
**1. **An active link pushes the new Invoice value to all the
detail entries
**2. **A filter recalculates each detail’s value(s)
**3. **A second active link (higher exec order) recalculates (or
triggers filters to recalc) Invoice values from the detail entries.
HTH,
*Joel***
Joel Senderjdsen...@earthlink.net javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'jdsen...@earthlink.net');310.829.5552
** **
*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
');]
*On
Behalf Of *Jose Huerta
*Sent:* Monday, June 11, 2012 5:27 AM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG');
*Subject:* Development question
** **
** Hi listers,
** **
I have a question for developers. I've got a solution, but I want to
know
if there is a better option, since it doesn't satisfy me 100%.
** **
Here's the case (It's not really my case, but a simplified version of
it):
** **
I have one form: AAA:Invoices.
This form has a table field that shows related requests on
AAA:DetailLines.
** **
So each invoice in AAA:Invoices is related to several Detail Lines in
AAA:DetailLines.
** **
I have a field in AAA:Invoices that is a parameter used to compute the
value of the detail lines. I call it: InvoiceParameter.
I have a filter that when InvoiceParameter is changed, it propagates it
to
all related detail lines. When those lines are modified, they
automatically
(with filters) recalculate their value.
** **
I also have a total value field at AAA:Invoices that it is the sum of
the
detail lines. I want to keep it updated, so I thinked some options, but
concurrency makes the result going wrong.
** **
Summarizing the case: The objective is that when modifying the field
InvoiceParameter at an Invoice, it propagates to the detail lines,
recalculating its value, and returns to the invoice with the total as
the
sum of all detail lines.
** **
If I do it with a filter, the contents of the table at AAA:Invoice is
not
updated until the end of the transaction. So I can't see the new values.
And If I use parameter sending, only one of the detail lines, do
actually
change the value, the rest are lost, (beacuse concurrency).
** **
Using
Re: Development question
Hi,
Well, I don't think it's a bug, and I don't think they will fix it.
I suggest that you try it, and then ask BMC if this is as designed.
The consistency of this bug is thorough, and I have depended heavily on
it in an internal RRR-system I built right after 7.6.04 was released.
Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://rrr.se
Very happy until reading your last sentence :)
I can't provide a development based on a bug. If someday BMC solves
it,
then my development will crash.
Thanks!
Jose M. Huerta
Project Manager**
Movil: 661 665 088
Telf.: 971 75 03 24
Fax: 971 75 07 94
http://www.sm2baleares.es/
SM2 Baleares S.A.
C/Rita Levi
Edificio SM2 Parc Bit
07121 Palma de Mallorca
http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954
http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares
http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares
La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es
confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea
leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje
por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos
que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del
mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de
inmediato.
P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es
necesario.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Misi Mladoniczky m...@rrr.se wrote:
Hi,
If you walk your table, and then perform a service-call to the
details-records one at a time.
Whatever happens inside that service-call (a push-fields to the
details-record in this case), will be committed to the database before
the
service-call exits.
This will then enable you to do a COLSUM(), or some such thing, on your
details-records after your table-walk has been completed.
The drawback is that the details-updates will be committed to the
database
even though a later update should fail with an error...
Another drawback is that Doug Mueller has told me that if it works like
that, it is a bug, and should be fixed. But I have seen no evidence of
this being addressed in the 3 service packs released so far...
Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)
Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy
logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at
http://rrr.se.
Can't use active links. The parameter can be changed from another form
using a push and active links won't be triggered.
Thanks!
El miércoles, 13 de junio de 2012, Joel Sender escribió:
**
Jose,
You might try it in stages;
**1. **An active link pushes the new Invoice value to all the
detail entries
**2. **A filter recalculates each detail’s value(s)
**3. **A second active link (higher exec order) recalculates
(or
triggers filters to recalc) Invoice values from the detail
entries.
HTH,
*Joel***
Joel Senderjdsen...@earthlink.net javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'jdsen...@earthlink.net');310.829.5552
** **
*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
');]
*On
Behalf Of *Jose Huerta
*Sent:* Monday, June 11, 2012 5:27 AM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG');
*Subject:* Development question
** **
** Hi listers,
** **
I have a question for developers. I've got a solution, but I want to
know
if there is a better option, since it doesn't satisfy me 100%.
** **
Here's the case (It's not really my case, but a simplified version of
it):
** **
I have one form: AAA:Invoices.
This form has a table field that shows related requests on
AAA:DetailLines.
** **
So each invoice in AAA:Invoices is related to several Detail Lines in
AAA:DetailLines.
** **
I have a field in AAA:Invoices that is a parameter used to compute
the
value of the detail lines. I call it: InvoiceParameter.
I have a filter that when InvoiceParameter is changed, it propagates
it
to
all related detail lines. When those lines are modified, they
automatically
(with filters) recalculate their value.
** **
I also have a total value field at AAA:Invoices that it is the sum of
the
detail lines. I want to keep it updated, so I thinked some options,
but
concurrency makes the result going wrong.
** **
Summarizing the case: The objective is that when modifying the field
InvoiceParameter at an Invoice, it propagates to the detail lines,
recalculating its value, and returns to the invoice
Re: Development question
Jose, You might try it in stages; 1. An active link pushes the new Invoice value to all the detail entries 2. A filter recalculates each detail’s value(s) 3. A second active link (higher exec order) recalculates (or triggers filters to recalc) Invoice values from the detail entries. HTH, Joel Joel Senderjdsen...@earthlink.net310.829.5552 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Jose Huerta Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 5:27 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Development question ** Hi listers, I have a question for developers. I've got a solution, but I want to know if there is a better option, since it doesn't satisfy me 100%. Here's the case (It's not really my case, but a simplified version of it): I have one form: AAA:Invoices. This form has a table field that shows related requests on AAA:DetailLines. So each invoice in AAA:Invoices is related to several Detail Lines in AAA:DetailLines. I have a field in AAA:Invoices that is a parameter used to compute the value of the detail lines. I call it: InvoiceParameter. I have a filter that when InvoiceParameter is changed, it propagates it to all related detail lines. When those lines are modified, they automatically (with filters) recalculate their value. I also have a total value field at AAA:Invoices that it is the sum of the detail lines. I want to keep it updated, so I thinked some options, but concurrency makes the result going wrong. Summarizing the case: The objective is that when modifying the field InvoiceParameter at an Invoice, it propagates to the detail lines, recalculating its value, and returns to the invoice with the total as the sum of all detail lines. If I do it with a filter, the contents of the table at AAA:Invoice is not updated until the end of the transaction. So I can't see the new values. And If I use parameter sending, only one of the detail lines, do actually change the value, the rest are lost, (beacuse concurrency). Using the override phase at PUSH actions, it overrides the ARS action, but not the SQL sending, that is sent at the end. My solution is to have a filter at AAA:Invoice that propagates the InvoiceParameter to the detail lines. Then the detail lines compute the result and make a PUSH to the Invoice marking a flag field (so no concurrency error is possible). Then an escalation executes at every minute on marked invoices, that computes the total. I hate using escalations for complex computations. Do you know any other way to achieve my objective without escalations? Jose M. Huerta Project Manager Movil: 661 665 088 Telf.: 971 75 03 24 Fax: 971 75 07 94 http://www.sm2baleares.es/ SM2 Baleares S.A. C/Rita Levi Edificio SM2 Parc Bit 07121 Palma de Mallorca http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954 http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato. P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es necesario. _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are image001.jpgimage002.jpgimage003.jpgimage004.jpg
Re: Development question
Can't use active links. The parameter can be changed from another form
using a push and active links won't be triggered.
Thanks!
El miércoles, 13 de junio de 2012, Joel Sender escribió:
**
Jose,
You might try it in stages;
**1. **An active link pushes the new Invoice value to all the
detail entries
**2. **A filter recalculates each detail’s value(s)
**3. **A second active link (higher exec order) recalculates (or
triggers filters to recalc) Invoice values from the detail entries.
HTH,
*Joel***
Joel Senderjdsen...@earthlink.net javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'jdsen...@earthlink.net');310.829.5552
** **
*From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG');] *On
Behalf Of *Jose Huerta
*Sent:* Monday, June 11, 2012 5:27 AM
*To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
'arslist@ARSLIST.ORG');
*Subject:* Development question
** **
** Hi listers,
** **
I have a question for developers. I've got a solution, but I want to know
if there is a better option, since it doesn't satisfy me 100%.
** **
Here's the case (It's not really my case, but a simplified version of it):
** **
I have one form: AAA:Invoices.
This form has a table field that shows related requests on AAA:DetailLines.
** **
So each invoice in AAA:Invoices is related to several Detail Lines in
AAA:DetailLines.
** **
I have a field in AAA:Invoices that is a parameter used to compute the
value of the detail lines. I call it: InvoiceParameter.
I have a filter that when InvoiceParameter is changed, it propagates it to
all related detail lines. When those lines are modified, they automatically
(with filters) recalculate their value.
** **
I also have a total value field at AAA:Invoices that it is the sum of the
detail lines. I want to keep it updated, so I thinked some options, but
concurrency makes the result going wrong.
** **
Summarizing the case: The objective is that when modifying the field
InvoiceParameter at an Invoice, it propagates to the detail lines,
recalculating its value, and returns to the invoice with the total as the
sum of all detail lines.
** **
If I do it with a filter, the contents of the table at AAA:Invoice is not
updated until the end of the transaction. So I can't see the new values.
And If I use parameter sending, only one of the detail lines, do actually
change the value, the rest are lost, (beacuse concurrency).
** **
Using the override phase at PUSH actions, it overrides the ARS action, but
not the SQL sending, that is sent at the end.
** **
** **
My solution is to have a filter at AAA:Invoice that propagates the
InvoiceParameter to the detail lines. Then the detail lines compute the
result and make a PUSH to the Invoice marking a flag field (so no
concurrency error is possible). Then an escalation executes at every
minute on marked invoices, that computes the total.
** **
I hate using escalations for complex computations. Do you know any other
way to achieve my objective without escalations?
Jose M. Huerta
Project Manager
Movil: 661 665 088
Telf.: 971 75 03 24
Fax: 971 75 07 94
http://www.sm2baleares.es/
SM2 Baleares S.A.
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_
--
Jose M. Huerta
Project Manager**
Movil: 661 665 088
Telf.: 971 75 03 24
Fax: 971 75 07 94
http://www.sm2baleares.es/
SM2 Baleares S.A.
C/Rita Levi
Edificio SM2 Parc Bit
07121 Palma de Mallorca
http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954
http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares
http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares
La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es
confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea
leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje
por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos
que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del
mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de
inmediato.
P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es
necesario.
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are
image003.jpgimage002.jpgimage001.jpgimage004.jpg
Development question
Hi listers, I have a question for developers. I've got a solution, but I want to know if there is a better option, since it doesn't satisfy me 100%. Here's the case (It's not really my case, but a simplified version of it): I have one form: AAA:Invoices. This form has a table field that shows related requests on AAA:DetailLines. So each invoice in AAA:Invoices is related to several Detail Lines in AAA:DetailLines. I have a field in AAA:Invoices that is a parameter used to compute the value of the detail lines. I call it: InvoiceParameter. I have a filter that when InvoiceParameter is changed, it propagates it to all related detail lines. When those lines are modified, they automatically (with filters) recalculate their value. I also have a total value field at AAA:Invoices that it is the sum of the detail lines. I want to keep it updated, so I thinked some options, but concurrency makes the result going wrong. Summarizing the case: The objective is that when modifying the field InvoiceParameter at an Invoice, it propagates to the detail lines, recalculating its value, and returns to the invoice with the total as the sum of all detail lines. If I do it with a filter, the contents of the table at AAA:Invoice is not updated until the end of the transaction. So I can't see the new values. And If I use parameter sending, only one of the detail lines, do actually change the value, the rest are lost, (beacuse concurrency). Using the override phase at PUSH actions, it overrides the ARS action, but not the SQL sending, that is sent at the end. My solution is to have a filter at AAA:Invoice that propagates the InvoiceParameter to the detail lines. Then the detail lines compute the result and make a PUSH to the Invoice marking a flag field (so no concurrency error is possible). Then an escalation executes at every minute on marked invoices, that computes the total. I hate using escalations for complex computations. Do you know any other way to achieve my objective without escalations? Jose M. Huerta Project Manager** Movil: 661 665 088 Telf.: 971 75 03 24 Fax: 971 75 07 94 http://www.sm2baleares.es/ SM2 Baleares S.A. C/Rita Levi Edificio SM2 Parc Bit 07121 Palma de Mallorca http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954 http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato. P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es necesario. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are image001.jpgimage004.jpgimage003.jpgimage002.jpg
Re: Development question
Hi,
I think you should go with your original plan and set a third field when
both A and B has been set. Alternatively use the SET-CHANGE-FLAG to 1
whenever both fields have values.
I presume taht by saying A is changed you mean ('A' != $NULL$), as this
is a display-only-field?
Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)
Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.
No. Since it can be used in filters. Mmm. I will explain deeper and more
abstract.
Imagine the next case.
If field A is changed - No change
If field B is changed - No change
If field A and B are changed - It changes.
So if i set disable change to both, the third option won't work. I was
planning to add a third field and active link that changes it only if both
fields A and B are changed. But looking for another ideas.
Jose M. Huerta
Project Manager**
Movil: 661 665 088
Telf.: 971 75 03 24
Fax: 971 75 07 94
http://www.sm2baleares.es/
SM2 Baleares S.A.
C/Rita Levi
Edificio SM2 Parc Bit
07121 Palma de Mallorca
http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954
http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares
http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares
La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es
confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea
leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje
por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos
que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del
mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de
inmediato.
P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es
necesario.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 15:45, Hyunkel v2.0
lord_dyna...@hotmail.comwrote:
**
Jose;
Is that field set as disabled change flag on its field properties?
Cheers.
*Hugo Ruesga*
*Software Development Advisor*
US 972.577.7000 x 332.3868
MX +52 (33) 3332.3868
P Please consider the environment before printing this email
*The information contained in and transferred with this electronic
message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is
protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the
sender
of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it
from
your system. **Thank you.*
--
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:34:14 +0100
From: jose.hue...@sm2baleares.es
Subject: Development question
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
** Hi listers,
Let's take the next example. Imagine we have a form, where there is some
display only field used to start some active link workflow. But if the
user
only changed this field I don't want that ARS consider the request as
modified and then prompts the user to abandon changes when he closes
the
form.
For instance a regular form with related forms. The related requests are
shown in a table field. And some display only fields allow selecting the
filtering of the table field. If someone changes the data of those
fields
to filter the table field and then closes the form, ARS prompts that if
he
abandon the form he will loose the changes.
I have some ideas about avoiding it, but I want to know your opinion and
how do you handle it.
Thanks,
Jose M. Huerta
Project Manager**
Movil: 661 665 088
Telf.: 971 75 03 24
Fax: 971 75 07 94
http://www.sm2baleares.es/
SM2 Baleares S.A.
C/Rita Levi
Edificio SM2 Parc Bit
07121 Palma de Mallorca
http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954
http://twitter.com/#%21/SM2Baleares
http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares
La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es
confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente
sea
leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este
mensaje
por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le
rogamos
que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias
del
mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de
inmediato.
P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es
necesario.
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12
Re: Development question
Yes, Misi. It is a very strange requirement, but, you know, the client can
be vary strange sometimes...
Jose M. Huerta
Project Manager**
Movil: 661 665 088
Telf.: 971 75 03 24
Fax: 971 75 07 94
http://www.sm2baleares.es/
SM2 Baleares S.A.
C/Rita Levi
Edificio SM2 Parc Bit
07121 Palma de Mallorca
http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954
http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares
http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares
La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es
confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea
leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje
por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos
que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del
mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de
inmediato.
P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es
necesario.
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 13:30, Misi Mladoniczky m...@rrr.se wrote:
Hi,
I think you should go with your original plan and set a third field when
both A and B has been set. Alternatively use the SET-CHANGE-FLAG to 1
whenever both fields have values.
I presume taht by saying A is changed you mean ('A' != $NULL$), as this
is a display-only-field?
Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011)
Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11):
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.
No. Since it can be used in filters. Mmm. I will explain deeper and more
abstract.
Imagine the next case.
If field A is changed - No change
If field B is changed - No change
If field A and B are changed - It changes.
So if i set disable change to both, the third option won't work. I was
planning to add a third field and active link that changes it only if
both
fields A and B are changed. But looking for another ideas.
Jose M. Huerta
Project Manager**
Movil: 661 665 088
Telf.: 971 75 03 24
Fax: 971 75 07 94
http://www.sm2baleares.es/
SM2 Baleares S.A.
C/Rita Levi
Edificio SM2 Parc Bit
07121 Palma de Mallorca
http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954
http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares
http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares
La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es
confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea
leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje
por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos
que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del
mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de
inmediato.
P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es
necesario.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 15:45, Hyunkel v2.0
lord_dyna...@hotmail.comwrote:
**
Jose;
Is that field set as disabled change flag on its field properties?
Cheers.
*Hugo Ruesga*
*Software Development Advisor*
US 972.577.7000 x 332.3868
MX +52 (33) 3332.3868
P Please consider the environment before printing this email
*The information contained in and transferred with this electronic
message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is
protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read,
copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the
sender
of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it
from
your system. **Thank you.*
--
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:34:14 +0100
From: jose.hue...@sm2baleares.es
Subject: Development question
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
** Hi listers,
Let's take the next example. Imagine we have a form, where there is some
display only field used to start some active link workflow. But if the
user
only changed this field I don't want that ARS consider the request as
modified and then prompts the user to abandon changes when he closes
the
form.
For instance a regular form with related forms. The related requests are
shown in a table field. And some display only fields allow selecting the
filtering of the table field. If someone changes the data of those
fields
to filter the table field and then closes the form, ARS prompts that if
he
abandon the form he will loose the changes.
I have some ideas about avoiding it, but I want to know your opinion and
how do you handle it.
Thanks,
Jose M. Huerta
Development question
Hi listers, Let's take the next example. Imagine we have a form, where there is some display only field used to start some active link workflow. But if the user only changed this field I don't want that ARS consider the request as modified and then prompts the user to abandon changes when he closes the form. For instance a regular form with related forms. The related requests are shown in a table field. And some display only fields allow selecting the filtering of the table field. If someone changes the data of those fields to filter the table field and then closes the form, ARS prompts that if he abandon the form he will loose the changes. I have some ideas about avoiding it, but I want to know your opinion and how do you handle it. Thanks, Jose M. Huerta Project Manager** Movil: 661 665 088 Telf.: 971 75 03 24 Fax: 971 75 07 94 http://www.sm2baleares.es/ SM2 Baleares S.A. C/Rita Levi Edificio SM2 Parc Bit 07121 Palma de Mallorca http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954 http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato. P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es necesario. ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are image001.jpgimage002.jpgimage003.jpgimage004.jpg
Re: Development question
Jose; Is that field set as disabled change flag on its field properties? Cheers. Hugo Ruesga Software Development Advisor US 972.577.7000 x 332.3868 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you. Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:34:14 +0100 From: jose.hue...@sm2baleares.es Subject: Development question To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** Hi listers, Let's take the next example. Imagine we have a form, where there is some display only field used to start some active link workflow. But if the user only changed this field I don't want that ARS consider the request as modified and then prompts the user to abandon changes when he closes the form. For instance a regular form with related forms. The related requests are shown in a table field. And some display only fields allow selecting the filtering of the table field. If someone changes the data of those fields to filter the table field and then closes the form, ARS prompts that if he abandon the form he will loose the changes. I have some ideas about avoiding it, but I want to know your opinion and how do you handle it. Thanks, Jose M. Huerta Project Manager Movil: 661 665 088Telf.: 971 75 03 24 Fax: 971 75 07 94 SM2 Baleares S.A. C/Rita Levi Edificio SM2 Parc Bit 07121 Palma de Mallorca La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato. P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es necesario. _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are attachment: image001.jpgattachment: image002.jpgattachment: image003.jpgattachment: image004.jpg
Re: Development question
No. Since it can be used in filters. Mmm. I will explain deeper and more abstract. Imagine the next case. If field A is changed - No change If field B is changed - No change If field A and B are changed - It changes. So if i set disable change to both, the third option won't work. I was planning to add a third field and active link that changes it only if both fields A and B are changed. But looking for another ideas. Jose M. Huerta Project Manager** Movil: 661 665 088 Telf.: 971 75 03 24 Fax: 971 75 07 94 http://www.sm2baleares.es/ SM2 Baleares S.A. C/Rita Levi Edificio SM2 Parc Bit 07121 Palma de Mallorca http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954 http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato. P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es necesario. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 15:45, Hyunkel v2.0 lord_dyna...@hotmail.comwrote: ** Jose; Is that field set as disabled change flag on its field properties? Cheers. *Hugo Ruesga* *Software Development Advisor* US 972.577.7000 x 332.3868 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email *The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. **Thank you.* -- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:34:14 +0100 From: jose.hue...@sm2baleares.es Subject: Development question To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** Hi listers, Let's take the next example. Imagine we have a form, where there is some display only field used to start some active link workflow. But if the user only changed this field I don't want that ARS consider the request as modified and then prompts the user to abandon changes when he closes the form. For instance a regular form with related forms. The related requests are shown in a table field. And some display only fields allow selecting the filtering of the table field. If someone changes the data of those fields to filter the table field and then closes the form, ARS prompts that if he abandon the form he will loose the changes. I have some ideas about avoiding it, but I want to know your opinion and how do you handle it. Thanks, Jose M. Huerta Project Manager** Movil: 661 665 088 Telf.: 971 75 03 24 Fax: 971 75 07 94 http://www.sm2baleares.es/ SM2 Baleares S.A. C/Rita Levi Edificio SM2 Parc Bit 07121 Palma de Mallorca http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954 http://twitter.com/#%21/SM2Baleares http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato. P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es necesario. _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are image004.jpgimage001.jpgimage003.jpgimage002.jpg
Re: Development question [I]
I knew that it was a better option... thanks. Jose M. Huerta Project Manager** Movil: 661 665 088 Telf.: 971 75 03 24 Fax: 971 75 07 94 http://www.sm2baleares.es/ SM2 Baleares S.A. C/Rita Levi Edificio SM2 Parc Bit 07121 Palma de Mallorca http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954 http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato. P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es necesario. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 15:48, Paul Nicolaides paul.nicolai...@db.comwrote: ** Classification: For internal use only Jose, If you want to do it workflow, look up GET-CHANGE-FLAG and SET-CHANGE-FLAG in the *Workflow Objects* guide. *Hyunkel v2.0 lord_dyna...@hotmail.com* Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 29/02/2012 14:45 Please respond to arslist@ARSLIST.ORG To arslist@ARSLIST.ORG cc Subject Re: Development question ** Jose; Is that field set as disabled change flag on its field properties? Cheers. *Hugo Ruesga* * Software Development Advisor* US 972.577.7000 x 332.3868 MX +52 (33) 3332.3868 P Please consider the environment before printing this email *The information contained in and transferred with this electronic message is intended only for the recipient(s) designated above, it is protected by law and it may contain information which is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, or use it, and do not disclose it to others. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you.* -- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:34:14 +0100 From: jose.hue...@sm2baleares.es Subject: Development question To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ** Hi listers, Let's take the next example. Imagine we have a form, where there is some display only field used to start some active link workflow. But if the user only changed this field I don't want that ARS consider the request as modified and then prompts the user to abandon changes when he closes the form. For instance a regular form with related forms. The related requests are shown in a table field. And some display only fields allow selecting the filtering of the table field. If someone changes the data of those fields to filter the table field and then closes the form, ARS prompts that if he abandon the form he will loose the changes. I have some ideas about avoiding it, but I want to know your opinion and how do you handle it. Thanks, Jose M. Huerta Project Manager Movil: 661 665 088 Telf.: 971 75 03 24 Fax: 971 75 07 94 http://www.sm2baleares.es/ SM2 Baleares S.A. C/Rita Levi Edificio SM2 Parc Bit 07121 Palma de Mallorca http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954 http://twitter.com/#%21/SM2Baleares http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato. P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es necesario. _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ --- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures. _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are image002.jpgimage003.jpgimage001.jpgimage004.jpg
Re: Development question
I believe you're looking for the 'Disable Change Flag' property which is on the properties of the field. - Original Message - From: Jose Huerta jose.hue...@sm2baleares.es To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 9:34:14 AM Subject: Development question ** Hi listers, Let's take the next example. Imagine we have a form, where there is some display only field used to start some active link workflow. But if the user only changed this field I don't want that ARS consider the request as modified and then prompts the user to abandon changes when he closes the form. For instance a regular form with related forms. The related requests are shown in a table field. And some display only fields allow selecting the filtering of the table field. If someone changes the data of those fields to filter the table field and then closes the form, ARS prompts that if he abandon the form he will loose the changes. I have some ideas about avoiding it, but I want to know your opinion and how do you handle it. Thanks, Jose M. Huerta Project Manager Movil: 661 665 088 Telf.: 971 75 03 24 Fax: 971 75 07 94 SM2 Baleares S.A. C/Rita Levi Edificio SM2 Parc Bit 07121 Palma de Mallorca La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato. P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es necesario. _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are
Re: Development question
The problem is that I didn't explain it very well. I knew about this property. My question was about controlling the change flag by workflow. I know how to do it right now. Resolved. Jose M. Huerta Project Manager** Movil: 661 665 088 Telf.: 971 75 03 24 Fax: 971 75 07 94 http://www.sm2baleares.es/ SM2 Baleares S.A. C/Rita Levi Edificio SM2 Parc Bit 07121 Palma de Mallorca http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954 http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato. P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es necesario. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 18:57, pritch pri...@ptd.net wrote: I believe you're looking for the 'Disable Change Flag' property which is on the properties of the field. - Original Message - From: Jose Huerta jose.hue...@sm2baleares.es To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 9:34:14 AM Subject: Development question ** Hi listers, Let's take the next example. Imagine we have a form, where there is some display only field used to start some active link workflow. But if the user only changed this field I don't want that ARS consider the request as modified and then prompts the user to abandon changes when he closes the form. For instance a regular form with related forms. The related requests are shown in a table field. And some display only fields allow selecting the filtering of the table field. If someone changes the data of those fields to filter the table field and then closes the form, ARS prompts that if he abandon the form he will loose the changes. I have some ideas about avoiding it, but I want to know your opinion and how do you handle it. Thanks, Jose M. Huerta Project Manager Movil: 661 665 088 Telf.: 971 75 03 24 Fax: 971 75 07 94 SM2 Baleares S.A. C/Rita Levi Edificio SM2 Parc Bit 07121 Palma de Mallorca La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato. P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es necesario. _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are image003.jpgimage001.jpgimage004.jpgimage002.jpg
Re: Development question
You ever thought about using the “Service” workflow? Thanks, Sean From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Jose Huerta Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 9:34 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Development question ** Hi listers, Let's take the next example. Imagine we have a form, where there is some display only field used to start some active link workflow. But if the user only changed this field I don't want that ARS consider the request as modified and then prompts the user to abandon changes when he closes the form. For instance a regular form with related forms. The related requests are shown in a table field. And some display only fields allow selecting the filtering of the table field. If someone changes the data of those fields to filter the table field and then closes the form, ARS prompts that if he abandon the form he will loose the changes. I have some ideas about avoiding it, but I want to know your opinion and how do you handle it. Thanks, Jose M. Huerta Project Manager Movil: 661 665 088 Telf.: 971 75 03 24 Fax: 971 75 07 94 [cid:image001.jpg@01CCF6F8.3BCB6710]http://www.sm2baleares.es/ SM2 Baleares S.A. C/Rita Levi Edificio SM2 Parc Bit 07121 Palma de Mallorca [cid:image002.jpg@01CCF6F8.3BCB6710] http://es-es.facebook.com/pages/SM2-Baleares/158608627954 [cid:image003.jpg@01CCF6F8.3BCB6710] http://twitter.com/#!/SM2Baleares [cid:image004.jpg@01CCF6F8.3BCB6710] http://www.linkedin.com/company/sm2-baleares La información contenida en este mensaje de correo electrónico es confidencial. La misma, es enviada con la intención de que únicamente sea leída por la persona(s) a la(s) que va dirigida. El acceso a este mensaje por otras personas no está autorizado, por lo que en tal caso, le rogamos que nos lo comunique por la misma vía, se abstenga de realizar copias del mensaje o remitirlo o entregarlo a otra persona y proceda a borrarlo de inmediato. P Por favor, no imprima este mensaje ni sus documentos adjuntos si no es necesario. _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.comhttp://www.wwrug.com ARSlist: Where the Answers Are_ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: Where the Answers Are inline: image001.jpginline: image002.jpginline: image003.jpginline: image004.jpg
