Re: [Asterisk-Users] diax softphone

2004-02-04 Thread Peer Oliver schmidt
Greg,

my Linux iptables firewall, on a private network. Both boxes cann register
iax2 to asterisk, and dial, but as soon as asterisk tries to do the native

a private network -- as in a NATed network? Maybe canreinvite=no or
nat=yes will do the magic you need.
I think he is using the IAX2 protocol, and I can't find anything in the 
sources that indicate canreinvite or NAT in the sources of chan_iax.c.

BTW: I have the same problem.

rgds
pos
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] diax softphone

2004-02-04 Thread Dan
Hi,

- Original Message - 
From: Peer Oliver schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Greg,

 my Linux iptables firewall, on a private network. Both boxes cann
register
 iax2 to asterisk, and dial, but as soon as asterisk tries to do the
native

  a private network -- as in a NATed network? Maybe canreinvite=no or
  nat=yes will do the magic you need.

 I think he is using the IAX2 protocol, and I can't find anything in the
 sources that indicate canreinvite or NAT in the sources of chan_iax.c.

 BTW: I have the same problem.

I have 2 DIAX phones behind two different NAT firewalls and the * box on one
of the phones network.
It works for me.
One of the NATs is a Wndows RRAS and the other one is a hardware broadband
router from Netgear.
I have just opened the 4569 UDP port on the firewall in both direction (for
input it is forwarded to the * box).

BR,
Dan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] diax softphone

2004-02-04 Thread Peer Oliver schmidt
Hi Dan,
iax2 to asterisk, and dial, but as soon as asterisk tries to do the
native 

BTW: I have the same problem.

I have 2 DIAX phones behind two different NAT firewalls and the * box on one
of the phones network.
It works for me.
Cool. I am sure it has nothing to do with DIAX, but might be the 
configuration on the * side. Using IAX(1) works fine, btw.

I have 4569 opened and forwarded/NATed to my *. I am on the same network 
as the * server, a friend is remote. After about a minute you loose the 
connection.

rgds
pos
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] diax softphone

2004-02-04 Thread Dan
Hi,

  I have 2 DIAX phones behind two different NAT firewalls and the * box on
one
  of the phones network.
  It works for me.

 Cool. I am sure it has nothing to do with DIAX, but might be the
 configuration on the * side. Using IAX(1) works fine, btw.

This is very interesting. It seems they still are a lot of bugs to be solved
in IAX2 ...:-(


 I have 4569 opened and forwarded/NATed to my *. I am on the same network
 as the * server, a friend is remote. After about a minute you loose the
 connection.

This is another problem and it happens for me too (known bug, which seems to
be related with the re-registration which occurs at 60s).

BR,
Dan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] billing information from telecom

2004-02-04 Thread Tomica Crnek



Hi everyone, I have 
TE410P connected via E1 to telecom and another E1 to my internal Ericsson PBX. 
All calls from PBX to telecom pass through Asterisk. Our telecom is providing us 
with billing information during a call, and I would like to transfer this 
information to PBX and be able to show it on user displays. If I connect my PBX 
directly to telecom trunk it is working ok, but now, with Asterisk in between I 
am not getting it. Can anyone tell what should be done regarding 
this.

thanks

Tomica


RE: [Asterisk-Users] 8 lines - best approach

2004-02-04 Thread Darren Martz
The problem is when replacing a Nortel system. The existing phones become
useless, so we're looking at either using totally IP based phones or using a
channel bank with different office phones.

The only problem is finding an IP phone that is decent for business,
supports multiple lines (at least 2) and is reasonably priced.

This is more difficult than I expected. The voip-info.org site has excellent
information, but it seems to show the IP phone coverage is still in the
early adopter stage. Please correct me if my statement is wrong, I'd love
for it to be wrong.

My thinking is that most of us are looking for hardware based IP Phone's
that work well with Asterisk and begin to go beyond the traditional business
phone.

So my first step is to find the most cost effective way to utilize our
traditional lines and move on from there.

Cheers,
Darren

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tilghman
Lesher
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 5:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 8 lines - best approach

On Friday 23 January 2004 12:18, Paul Mahler wrote:
 On Friday, January 23, 2004 at 8:04 AM, Steven Critchfield wrote:
  On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 09:30, Darren Martz wrote:
   I have 8 lines coming into an existing PBX system and am looking
   for a cost
   effective way to replace the existing system with Asterisk. We
   need some of
   the features in Asterisk, including its ability to support remote
   offices (long distance savings).
  
   At first glance this appears to require a T100P card and a channel
   bank, but
   that seems rather expensive. My estimated price on that would be
   roughly $2600 for 8 lines given that system - perhaps my estimate
   is way off
  
   Is there another way that is more cost effective?
 
  That number sounds about right. It is likely that it will be less,
  but budgeting that much for hardware is a good start.
 
 Do you have to continue to use the existing handsets? You should look
 at replacing the existing phones with SIP phones.

He did say cost-effective.  Last I checked, 24 SIP phones (unless they
are Grandstreams) will cost far more than a channel bank.

-Tilghman


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dialling Hook Flash on Zaptel

2004-02-04 Thread Christopher Lee
 I had some similar problems with the X100P and our ATA-2.  I also couldn't
 ever get the Nortel to recognize the DTMF, or get Asterisk to recognize
 DTMF
 coming through the Nortel.  I wish I could say that I figured out a really
 cool way to make it work, but instead I moved on and interconnected via
 PRIs.

I did a little more testing here, I've found that from my Cisco 7940 dialing
out to my mobile, I can dial DTMF tones and hear them on the mobile. I'm not
sure if the Norstar is doing this, as no matter how long I press the button
down for I only get a short beep of the DTMF tone on the mobile.

Perhaps this means the Norstar can only pass along the tones but not
actually interpret them, or maybe the DTMF tone length is too short for the
Norstar.

Either way, I've changed the station filter for this particular extension to
allow a greater range of numbers to be dialled and will control it with the
dial plans in Asterisk.

I've also considered changing the interconnection method, unfortunately
(although this may be a good thing) my system is only a baby CICS with a
4-port analog trunk module and a 4-port BRI module. 

To connect via the analog trunk would be really neat with a 4-port FXS
digium card, but unfortunately this particular Nortel card is not a
supervised card, so can't be setup in the Norstar for auto-answer (which was
my main reason for installing the BRI card).

Then in terms of connecting via BRI, I think it would probably be more
effective in the long run to just replace the whole system with SIP handsets
since there's only 7 extensions in use (although the cost of Cisco 7940's
would quickly add up, but I wouldn't want to use anything less even though
they may be cheaper, as these are fantastic phones and really worth it
IMHO).

Also apart from the handset replacement cost, I think it'll be somewhat hard
to beat the near bullet-proof performance the current CICS system has given
us. The only outages its ever had was to install the BRI card and the odd
power outage that was long enough to fully drain the UPS batteries. 

Cheers,
Chris Lee


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] GS and NAT

2004-02-04 Thread Matteo Brancaleoni
hi.
I've gs working under NAT,
simply put nat=yes into sip.conf section if *,
then enable nat into the gs, without any stun server.

Matteo.

Il mar, 2004-02-03 alle 21:17, Tomas Prybil ha scritto:
 Hi all.
 
 Is it at all possible to have a GS B101 NATed with firmware 1.0.4.40?
 I've tried both STUN and not STUN. The odds seems best with stun because 
 the phone registers with right ip adress.
 When the connection is made * sends rtp packets to the right destination 
 AND port, but the phone doesn't accept the packets.
 
 Should I burn my D-LINK 604 or upgrade the GS?
 
 /t
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Matteo Brancaleoni
Espia System Administrator
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web   : http://www.espia.it
Phone : +39 02 70633354  - ext 201
IAX(2): [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ext 201
Iaxtel: 1-700-56-62458   - ext 201

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] X100P and PSTN line Callwaiting

2004-02-04 Thread Dan
Hi,

There is any way to use the PSTN line callwaiting functionality (including
callwaiting callerID) with an X00P card?
When a second incoming call, on an internal ATA I hear the callwaiting tone,
but I don't know how to switch to the other caller through ATA-*-X100P.
More, the callerid is not displayed during callwaiting (just during a
standard call).
There is any direct way to switch the calls from the phone connected to an
ATA device?
There is any modification to be made in the callerid.c file for the
callwaiting callerid functionality? (I have to make one for the normal call
in order to support my provider type of callerid signal, but does not work
for callwaiting callerid too).

Thanks,
Dan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP debug logs

2004-02-04 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Debuuging SIP to a file:

asterisk -c | tee /tmp/sipdebug.log

then turn on 'sip debug' at the CLI

/O

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Do you Linux softphone..

2004-02-04 Thread WipeOut
An article I came across this morning..

http://www.itnews.com.au/storycontent.asp?ID=12Art_ID=18128

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 (was: diax softphone )

2004-02-04 Thread Dan
Hi,

From: Peer Oliver schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 I have 4569 opened and forwarded/NATed to my *. I am on the same network
 as the * server, a friend is remote. After about a minute you loose the
 connection.

  This is another problem and it happens for me too (known bug, which
seems to
  be related with the re-registration which occurs at 60s).

 Maybe those two problems are related to each other, i.e. IAX2 tries to
 bridge the call ... (I have no idea what I am talking about)


I think that the call is allways passed through the * server if IAX(2) is
used.

BR,
Dan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Code Hosting...

2004-02-04 Thread Andy Powell
lo,

Is there a single central location for code and applications other than CVS? I'm 
talking about code that can't/wont be included in CVS for various reasons? Does the 
wiki have this sort of thing? I've done some code for the Cepstral TTS engine (bkw has 
done some updates too) but apparently this will never make it into CVS (since the 
engine is not GPL)... Seems to make sense to have a central location for this type of 
'outlaw' code... The bug tracker is useless for this sort of thing but there seem to 
be a number of bits of code like this in there

moo

Andy


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Code Hosting...

2004-02-04 Thread WipeOut
Andy Powell wrote:

lo,

Is there a single central location for code and applications other than CVS? I'm talking about code that can't/wont be included in CVS for various reasons? Does the wiki have this sort of thing? I've done some code for the Cepstral TTS engine (bkw has done some updates too) but apparently this will never make it into CVS (since the engine is not GPL)... Seems to make sense to have a central location for this type of 'outlaw' code... The bug tracker is useless for this sort of thing but there seem to be a number of bits of code like this in there

moo

Andy

 

I don't know of any repository, if you have access to a webserver why 
not start one? :)

Later..

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Code Hosting...

2004-02-04 Thread info-lists
Andy,
I would be interested in your Cepstral engine code.
Regards,
Robert
Friedrichshafen, Germany

Andy Powell said:
 lo,

 Is there a single central location for code and applications other than
 CVS? I'm talking about code that can't/wont be included in CVS for various
 reasons? Does the wiki have this sort of thing? I've done some code for
 the Cepstral TTS engine (bkw has done some updates too) but apparently
 this will never make it into CVS (since the engine is not GPL)... Seems to
 make sense to have a central location for this type of 'outlaw' code...
 The bug tracker is useless for this sort of thing but there seem to be a
 number of bits of code like this in there

 moo

 Andy


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Port bind

2004-02-04 Thread Senad Jordanovic
I have two cards in one of the servers. If I bind SIP port to public IP,
it all works fine. If I do not bind to specific IP (ie. Bind = 0.0.0.0),
I get segmentation fault while starting *.

Can SIP (and other protocols), bind to more then one IP address?
If yes, what is syntax?

SJ




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Port bind

2004-02-04 Thread Vic Cross
G'day,

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Senad Jordanovic wrote:

 I have two cards in one of the servers. If I bind SIP port to public IP,
 it all works fine. If I do not bind to specific IP (ie. Bind = 0.0.0.0),
 I get segmentation fault while starting *.

I have this configuration also, with two network cards and sip.conf 
specifying bindaddr = 0.0.0.0.  No problems, so it definitely works.  I 
think you'll need to provide further debug information (logs, core 
analysis, etc) so that the gurus can try and help you.

Hoo-roo,
Vic Cross
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 (was: diax softphone )

2004-02-04 Thread Grzegorz Nosek
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:13:52 +0200, Dan wrote
 Hi,
 
 From: Peer Oliver schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  I have 4569 opened and forwarded/NATed to my *. I am on the same
network
  as the * server, a friend is remote. After about a minute you
loose the
  connection.
 
   This is another problem and it happens for me too (known bug, which
 seems to
   be related with the re-registration which occurs at 60s).
 
  Maybe those two problems are related to each other, i.e. IAX2 tries to
  bridge the call ... (I have no idea what I am talking about)
 
 
 I think that the call is allways passed through the * server 
 if IAX(2) is used.
 
 BR,
 Dan
 

Actually, IAX(2) calls are bridged whenever they can. The server sends
TXREQ to both legs of the call and the clients try to connect to each
other. What came to my mind is that it might break in NAT
environment... Let's see (Note: not tested in the wild, just
speculations):
 - UA1 10.0.0.10:4569 - inside NAT
 - UA2 1.1.1.1:4569 - outside NAT
 - server 10.0.0.1:4569/2.2.2.2:4569 - accessible from both UAs

UA1 and UA2 register on the server, which fills their apparent_address
info the way it can see them (UA1 has private IP, UA2 is public). When
a call is established and UA1 and UA2 send TXCNTs to each other, they
get the peer address from the * server, so
 - UA1 tries to connect to 1.1.1.1:4569 which should work (NATted by
the router)
 - UA2 tries to connect to 10.0.0.10:4569 - no go.
 - UA1's packet reaches UA2 (say, NATted to 2.2.2.2:5), so UA2
sends TXACC, but (correct me if I'm wrong here) the peer address is
not updated.

Thus, the connection breaks as UA1 never receives the TXACC that UA2
sent. If libiax2 (and chan_iax2 - though I haven't actually looked
into it too much) set the peer's address upon receipt of TXCNT, it
might work (UA2 would talk to 2.2.2.2:5 which the router would NAT
back to 10.0.0.10:4569). If that's not the problem, sorry for
confusing you. :) A packet dump should reveal all.

What do you think?
 Greg

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 (was: diax softphone )

2004-02-04 Thread Dan
Hi,

- Original Message - 
From: Grzegorz Nosek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ...
 A packet dump should reveal all.

 What do you think?

Good idea.
Use Debug feature in DIAX and send both phones and asterisk logs to check
them offline (you'll have timestamps on each phone log so you can rebuild
the whole conversation.
As I told before, it works in my environment, so I have no way to reproduce
this behaviour here.

BR,
Dan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Newbie: Chan_capi, early b3 in Italy

2004-02-04 Thread Matteo Rancilio
When I make a call and the other party is busy I do not hear anything 
but a free ringing phone.
Also, if I call a call center with a voice menu the phone keep ringing 
without any sign of life.

I tried early b3 with these ones but nothing change much:
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-pagehistory.php?page=Asterisk+CAPI+readmediff=2 



My extensions are

[outgoing]
exten = 0,1,Goto(outgoing-isdn,s,1)
[outgoing-isdn]
exten = s,1,NoOp()
exten = _X.,1,Dial(CAPI/0255:b${EXTEN}|30)


Any idea?
Is Asterisk compatible with Italian signal out of the box?
Thank you all in advance
mr


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Minor Registration Problem With Polycom Soun dpoint IP 500

2004-02-04 Thread mattf
What firmware and sip versions are you using? I have several Polycom phones
on my system right now and I've never had any registration problems with
them. 

Instead of leaving the host as dynamic try declaring an IP address(that's
the only difference I see between your sip.conf and mine).

If you are still having problems I've like to see your polycom .cfg files
for one of these phones, you might be missing a setting in one of them.

MATT---


-Original Message-
From: David Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 1:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Minor Registration Problem With Polycom Soundpoint
IP 500


We recently took a few Polycom Soundpoint IP 500 to test out in Asterisk
environment.  So far it has been good.  Call Hold, Transfer, DMTF etc.
 
However, I do notice every now and then the Polycom fails to register with
Asterisk.  Asterisk console outputs the following:
 
Feb  3 13:02:32 WARNING[278546]: chan_sip.c:2365 __transmit_response: Unable
to determine sequence number from ''
Feb  3 13:02:34 NOTICE[278546]: chan_sip.c:5125 handle_request: Failed to
authenticate user DavidLiu
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=9F67E426-59D92ED7
Feb  3 13:02:36 NOTICE[278546]: chan_sip.c:5125 handle_request: Failed to
authenticate user DavidLiu
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=BFDEF35B-1CBC4F2C

in sip.conf:
canreinvite=yes
host=dynamic
canreinvite=yes
dtmfmode=rfc2833
context=sip
port=5060

Usually say after the phone failed to register with Asterisk, I can attempt
to place a call.  It will fail of course.  But then I can try calling again
and usually the call will go through and it will successfully re-register
itself without needing a restart.  
 
What can this be?  Surely Polycom is re-registering every 3600 before
Asterisk times it out.  But Asterisk is just refusing it.
 
By the way, anyone know whether Asterisk is geared towards RFC3261 or
RFC2543?  I know Asterisk is not a fully SIP Proxy but lets say if a SIP
PSTNGW or a SIP phone is designed under the spec 2543 as suppose to 3261,
will it work better or the same with Asterisk?
 
David
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] VOIP Deployment Concerns

2004-02-04 Thread Walt Reed
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 12:38:37AM -0500, William Suffill said:
 I will be moving in a few months and I'm concerned as to what kind of
 bandwidth I would need to work effectively. The reason I posed the
 question here is simple most of my work is remote SSH to various
 BSD/Linux machines but a majority of my business calls from the office
 and clients will be routed through Asterisk. Currently I use a SIP phone
snip 
 Where I'll be moving will more than likely be installing broadband from
 Adelphia Cable 256up 3mbit down unless I have a valid reason to require
 the 512up/4mbit down prem. package at approximately 80 a month. I don't
 have any personal experience with them since I do live in NJ and will be
 relocating to FL. Any advise would greatly appreciated.
snip

Good luck with Adelphia. My experience is that the service is VERY
flakey. Sure, you can occasionally get the 3Mb down, rarely get the
256Kb up, but the norm seems to have LOTS of service outages that last
5 seconds to a minute. I also found that as soon as school let out,
bandwidth and latency SUCKED. It also frequently went offline for hours
at a time (3 days in one case.) My normal upload was 5Kb, and download
was 100Kb. IMHO, cable is not a good medium for VOIP (at least
adelphia's service... I've heard other cable companies are better.)

When called about it, Adelphia claims that their service is designed for
web browsing and not interactive applications. WTF???

It would be interesting to hear others experiences.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] CALEA?

2004-02-04 Thread Rich Adamson

 What are my support options for CALEA with Asterisk?
  

Don't think you'll find any support without some major AGI/Manager programming,
and then not likely to interface with the calea requesters.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 quick dial

2004-02-04 Thread Christopher Lee
Out of interest, does anyone know if it's possible to get the 7960 to start
accepting a number while on-hook, without having to press NewCall, the
line button, or speaker button? 

This is just something I was used to with the Norstar extensions, I could
immediately start dialing the numbers for an internal extension and it'd
work.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Inzunza/YM/RWDOE
 Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2004 2:21 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 quick dial
 
 Is there a way to make  the Cisco 7960 SIP phone dial out automatically
 without having to press the dial button, once the numbers that you have
 entered match a specific pattern?  This feature is present when the phone
 is working with a Cisco CallManager.  For example, if all of my internal
 extensions begin with a '5' and are four digits long, if I dialed '5123'
 on
 the phone, the call would initiate once I pressed the '3'.  Any help would
 be appreciated.
 
 Jose
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Mediatrix sip fxo gateway workaround?

2004-02-04 Thread Clif Jones
Rich,

If the Mediatrix uses the Caller-ID field to select which channel to 
use, then you really have no
choice but to do that.  As you pointed out, the Caller-ID info is not 
(and cannot) be passed to
the PSTN line.

Rich Adamson wrote:

Possible Mediatrix 1204 fxo sip gateway workaround

Need some feedback from experienced * users relative to this workaround
please please please.
Problem: The mediatrix 4-port fxo gateway does not provide any mechanism
for * to select which port an outbound pstn call will use. (See lots
of previous posts over the past four days for more detail if needed.)
Our reseller has been working with Mediatrix to find a way for *
to send pstn calls to a specific port number on their 1204 4-port fxo sip 
gateway. The proposed work around (below) sets a unique-but-well-known 
CallerID prior to sending the call to the 1204, and the 1204 filters on 
the CallerID sending the outbound call to the designated port. (The 1204
_does_ have such filtering/routing capability.)

Since this unique callerid is _never_ forwarded to the US pstn providers,
does anyone see any technical or management problem with using this approach
both in the short and long term???
I'm thinking this is an acceptable workaround since it does not require
micro-managing the dialplan, the 1204, etc. In my case, I'm not very concerned
with scaling the solution since we could only hope business would increase
to the point where four additional pstn analog lines were needed. ;)
(FWIW, a 3,congestion statement can be added to the proposed statements.)
Thoughts anyone?
Rich
 

Ok, you need to use the net2pstnsourcefilter  to make this work. In this
example you need to set port 1 to , 2 to , 3 to , 4 to  .
Then with the extension configuration below, and number starting with 9 will
go to port 1 with the 9 removed from the string sent. Any number starting
with 8 will be sent to port 2 with the 8 removed from the string sent and so
on. It works like a charm on my 1204.
[SIP]
exten = _9.,1,SETCIDNUM()
exten = _9.,2,Dial,SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exten = _8.,1,SETCIDNUM()
exten = _8.,1,Dial,SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exten = _7.,1,SETCIDNUM()
exten = _7.,2,Dial,SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exten = _6.,1,SETCIDNUM()
exten = _6.,2,Dial,SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 quick dial

2004-02-04 Thread Rich Adamson
 Out of interest, does anyone know if it's possible to get the 7960 to start
 accepting a number while on-hook, without having to press NewCall, the
 line button, or speaker button? 
 
 This is just something I was used to with the Norstar extensions, I could
 immediately start dialing the numbers for an internal extension and it'd
 work.

I don't believe there is any way to do that. Would be handy though.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 bug in 6.1 evident in Asterisk

2004-02-04 Thread Brian West
Question.. is the 7960 on the same subnet as your asterisk server?  I have
a 7960 registered with 3 diffrent asterisk servers.  All 6 lines.  Running
6.1 and has 12 days of uptime.

bkw

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, John Todd wrote:


 So, I've managed to consistently lock up my Cisco 7960 (SIP 6.1) to
 the point where it needs to be unplugged, due to software errors.
 This is a first.

 My suspicions are that this bug in Asterisk is causing the lockups:
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=889

 It seems unusual to me that a low volume of bogus SIP messages should
 lock up the 7960, but that seems to be the case.   It seems this only
 happens on my 7960 that I have completely full of extensions (all six
 line buttons are lit, two of them are auto-answer.)   I think this is
 one bug tickling another bug; bad messages from * are killing the
 7960.

 I'd like anyone else with experiences with this  type of failure with
 Asterisk to give me a shout; I'm going to report this to Cisco
 somehow, but don't have enough evidence.

 JT

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 : No one-way audio

2004-02-04 Thread Isamar Maia

One friend with Cisco 7960 with public IP address connect to my
* box and I called me to my home phone through a X100P.
He can hear me clearly and I cannot hear him.

I thought the problem could be a NAT in the middle.. but there is no NAT.

Any thoughts?

Isamar

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 quick dial

2004-02-04 Thread Brian West
I have one word for you... LAZY!

bkw

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Christopher Lee wrote:

 Out of interest, does anyone know if it's possible to get the 7960 to start
 accepting a number while on-hook, without having to press NewCall, the
 line button, or speaker button?

 This is just something I was used to with the Norstar extensions, I could
 immediately start dialing the numbers for an internal extension and it'd
 work.

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jose Inzunza/YM/RWDOE
  Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2004 2:21 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 quick dial
 
  Is there a way to make  the Cisco 7960 SIP phone dial out automatically
  without having to press the dial button, once the numbers that you have
  entered match a specific pattern?  This feature is present when the phone
  is working with a Cisco CallManager.  For example, if all of my internal
  extensions begin with a '5' and are four digits long, if I dialed '5123'
  on
  the phone, the call would initiate once I pressed the '3'.  Any help would
  be appreciated.
 
  Jose
 
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Boards falling out...

2004-02-04 Thread Greg Kedrovsky
I have a TDM40B, 4-port fxs card. Each port seems to have it's own
little board on the fxs card. Each little board is not sodered in, but
rather hangs (I have a vertical case for the server) on what I would
call jumper pins (sorry, I'm not a profession geek, just a wannabe). One
of my little boards, over time, slides off those jumper pins. I just
noticed it this morning. I had to power down, seat it, and power up
again. That's a pain. 

We did, though, have an earthquake this morning. That may have shaken
things loose a bit. But, it wasn't much to speak of (long, but not
strong). 

Has anyone else experienced this problem? What could I do to solve it
(seat the little card a little more permanently)? 

Thanks ahead of time.

-Greg

-- 
Mutt 1.4.1i on Slackware 9.1 Linux
Curridabat, San Jose, Costa Rica
http://www.greg-and-sue.com/screenshot.jpg
Yahoo Instant Messenger ID: gregkedro
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 quick dial

2004-02-04 Thread Christopher Lee
Then you've got to hand it to Nortel, they do know how to make a damn good
phone extensions for lazy people like me :-) 

I actually believe this isn't the case with the Nortel Meridian systems, as
I noticed when using one it wouldn't accept the numbers without first
pressing that extensions DN key... perhaps it's just a Norstar CICS/MICS
features. 

Anyway I've opened a TAC case with Cisco and will await their response,
which I'm guessing already will be no, can't hurt to ask tho :-) 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West
 Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2004 11:58 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 quick dial
 
 I have one word for you... LAZY!
 
 bkw
 
 On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Christopher Lee wrote:
 
  Out of interest, does anyone know if it's possible to get the 7960 to
 start
  accepting a number while on-hook, without having to press NewCall, the
  line button, or speaker button?
 
  This is just something I was used to with the Norstar extensions, I
 could
  immediately start dialing the numbers for an internal extension and it'd
  work.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 quick dial

2004-02-04 Thread Brian West
hehe ya I have to admit they are very featureful. :P  Asterisk is still a
baby i'm sure sip phones will get better with time.  But you do have to
admit that the cisco 7960's are damn good phones.

bkw

On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Christopher Lee wrote:

 Then you've got to hand it to Nortel, they do know how to make a damn good
 phone extensions for lazy people like me :-)

 I actually believe this isn't the case with the Nortel Meridian systems, as
 I noticed when using one it wouldn't accept the numbers without first
 pressing that extensions DN key... perhaps it's just a Norstar CICS/MICS
 features.

 Anyway I've opened a TAC case with Cisco and will await their response,
 which I'm guessing already will be no, can't hurt to ask tho :-)

  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West
  Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2004 11:58 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 quick dial
 
  I have one word for you... LAZY!
 
  bkw
 
  On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Christopher Lee wrote:
 
   Out of interest, does anyone know if it's possible to get the 7960 to
  start
   accepting a number while on-hook, without having to press NewCall, the
   line button, or speaker button?
  
   This is just something I was used to with the Norstar extensions, I
  could
   immediately start dialing the numbers for an internal extension and it'd
   work.

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] talking clock

2004-02-04 Thread Deepakumar JV



Hello

I am looking for a AGI application that 
can say the current time with seconds, but i don't need the 
day/year.

Has anyone got this already?

Thanks in advance
Deepak


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Code Hosting...

2004-02-04 Thread Brian West
I agree.  app_cepstral is a damn fine app and has been banished to the
edges of the earth because the theta engine isn't open src.  I even added
a standalone build for app_cepstral... so you can download it.. make it
and install it without much trouble.  :(

Andy maybe we can go thru and pickout the offending code and compile them
on a site or something?  I can setup a mirror for them.

bkw

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Andy Powell wrote:

 lo,

 Is there a single central location for code and applications other than
 CVS? I'm talking about code that can't/wont be included in CVS for
 various reasons? Does the wiki have this sort of thing? I've done some
 code for the Cepstral TTS engine (bkw has done some updates too) but
 apparently this will never make it into CVS (since the engine is not
 GPL)... Seems to make sense to have a central location for this type of
 'outlaw' code... The bug tracker is useless for this sort of thing but
 there seem to be a number of bits of code like this in there

 moo

 Andy


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] talking clock

2004-02-04 Thread Brian West
SayUnixTime will do that just give it the format you want.

SayUnixTime([unixtime][|[timezone][|format]])
  unixtime: time, in seconds since Jan 1, 1970.  May be negative.
  defaults to now.
  timezone: timezone, see /usr/share/zoneinfo for a list.
  defaults to machine default.
  format:   a format the time is to be said in.  See voicemail.conf.
  defaults to ABdY 'digits/at' IMp
  Returns 0 or -1 on hangup.


bkw

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Deepakumar JV wrote:

 Hello

 I am looking for a AGI application that can  say the current time with seconds, but 
 i don't need the day/year.

 Has anyone got this already?

 Thanks in advance
 Deepak
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 quick dial

2004-02-04 Thread Christopher Lee
Absolutely no argument from me on that front, hands down the Cisco 7940/7960
are a damn good IP phone, and compared to the existing Norstar handsets we
have, a far better phone overall. 

The handsfree functionality on the Cisco's is truly awesome, the mic pickup
and clarity is far better than the Norstar and people can barely tell the
difference between talking to them on handsfree or picking up the handpiece.


Definitely worth every dollar, although I wouldn't say no to them lowering
the price, which they appear to have done with the introduction of the 7970.

The next phone I want to get is a Cisco 7920 WiFi... although once again,
they're on the exy side, I'm sure they'll also be well worth it.
Unfortunately they aren't available in Australia yet, hopefully not too far
off.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian West
 Sent: Thursday, 5 February 2004 12:15 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 quick dial
 
 hehe ya I have to admit they are very featureful. :P  Asterisk is still a
 baby i'm sure sip phones will get better with time.  But you do have to
 admit that the cisco 7960's are damn good phones.
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Do you Linux softphone..

2004-02-04 Thread Walker Haddock
The link to the download site for the softphone is:
http://www.lipz4.com/lipz4.htm

On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 08:57:00AM +, WipeOut wrote:
 An article I came across this morning..
 
 http://www.itnews.com.au/storycontent.asp?ID=12Art_ID=18128
-- 
   DataCrest, Inc. -- Technically Superior   **
Walker Haddock   http://www.datacrest.com
DataCrest, Inc.e-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1634A Montgomery Hwy.phone:  1-888-941-3282, 1-205-335-8589
Birmingham, AL 35216  fax:  1-205-823-7838
***
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Boards falling out...

2004-02-04 Thread Mark Spencer
Usually the cards seat pretty well.  Do you have a green or blue
TDM40B card?

Mark

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Greg Kedrovsky wrote:

 I have a TDM40B, 4-port fxs card. Each port seems to have it's own
 little board on the fxs card. Each little board is not sodered in, but
 rather hangs (I have a vertical case for the server) on what I would
 call jumper pins (sorry, I'm not a profession geek, just a wannabe). One
 of my little boards, over time, slides off those jumper pins. I just
 noticed it this morning. I had to power down, seat it, and power up
 again. That's a pain.

 We did, though, have an earthquake this morning. That may have shaken
 things loose a bit. But, it wasn't much to speak of (long, but not
 strong).

 Has anyone else experienced this problem? What could I do to solve it
 (seat the little card a little more permanently)?

 Thanks ahead of time.

 -Greg

 --
 Mutt 1.4.1i on Slackware 9.1 Linux
 Curridabat, San Jose, Costa Rica
 http://www.greg-and-sue.com/screenshot.jpg
 Yahoo Instant Messenger ID: gregkedro
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] talking clock

2004-02-04 Thread Deepakumar JV
Thanks for your reply Brian.

I am able to get only the hour and minute but not the seconds. I need
seconds also, any suggestions?

Regards
Deepak
- Original Message - 
From: Brian West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 02:23 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] talking clock


 SayUnixTime will do that just give it the format you want.

 SayUnixTime([unixtime][|[timezone][|format]])
   unixtime: time, in seconds since Jan 1, 1970.  May be negative.
   defaults to now.
   timezone: timezone, see /usr/share/zoneinfo for a list.
   defaults to machine default.
   format:   a format the time is to be said in.  See voicemail.conf.
   defaults to ABdY 'digits/at' IMp
   Returns 0 or -1 on hangup.


 bkw

 On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Deepakumar JV wrote:

  Hello
 
  I am looking for a AGI application that can  say the current time with
seconds, but i don't need the day/year.
 
  Has anyone got this already?
 
  Thanks in advance
  Deepak
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Boards falling out...

2004-02-04 Thread Greg Hill
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Greg Kedrovsky wrote:
 Has anyone else experienced this problem? What could I do to solve it
 (seat the little card a little more permanently)?

Automotive parts places sell products like lok-tite (a thread locker
compound for mechanical fasteners). A drop or two of that, placed over the
seam in the connector (after it's fully seated!) would probably hold it in
place. This is the same kind of stuff you see on the screws that hold PCBs
in their place in nearly everything. It seems to do well keeping those
from rattling loose, so it would probably work for your card too.

Greg


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Boards falling out...

2004-02-04 Thread Greg Kedrovsky
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 08:42:04AM -0600, Mark Spencer wrote:
 Usually the cards seat pretty well.  Do you have a green or blue
 TDM40B card?

Blue. 

-- 
Mutt 1.4.1i on Slackware 9.1 Linux
Curridabat, San Jose, Costa Rica
http://www.greg-and-sue.com/screenshot.jpg
Yahoo Instant Messenger ID: gregkedro
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] talking clock

2004-02-04 Thread Brian West
Search bugs.digium.com their was a patch for seconds but I don't think it
was applied yet

bkw

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Deepakumar JV wrote:

 Thanks for your reply Brian.

 I am able to get only the hour and minute but not the seconds. I need
 seconds also, any suggestions?

 Regards
 Deepak
 - Original Message -
 From: Brian West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 02:23 PM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] talking clock


  SayUnixTime will do that just give it the format you want.
 
  SayUnixTime([unixtime][|[timezone][|format]])
unixtime: time, in seconds since Jan 1, 1970.  May be negative.
defaults to now.
timezone: timezone, see /usr/share/zoneinfo for a list.
defaults to machine default.
format:   a format the time is to be said in.  See voicemail.conf.
defaults to ABdY 'digits/at' IMp
Returns 0 or -1 on hangup.
 
 
  bkw
 
  On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Deepakumar JV wrote:
 
   Hello
  
   I am looking for a AGI application that can  say the current time with
 seconds, but i don't need the day/year.
  
   Has anyone got this already?
  
   Thanks in advance
   Deepak
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Cepstral TTS Code

2004-02-04 Thread info-lists
Feedback for the list.  I compiled Andy's code.  Installation went well
(except for me misspellng something in the dialplan) with no problems.
The Application works great.   Will run down Brian's and give it a try too.

Robert
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Whats wrong with dialplan?

2004-02-04 Thread Chris Lee
I am having problems with my dial plan, please help me locate the problem:

In the following dialplan, I am not able to press 8 to get to voicemail 
main while the 3000 mailbox unavailable message is being read in the 
background.
What am I doing wrong?

[globals]
;physical-phones
p1 = SIP/p3000
p2 = SIP/p3001
p3 = SIP/p3002
p4 = some other physical phone
;lines
line1 = Zap/1
[voicemail access]
;Extension 8 to get to voicmail:
exten = 8,1,VoicemailMain
[no match]
exten = _.,1,Playback(sorry-no-match)
exten = _.,2,Hangup
[extensions]
;ext3000:
exten = 3000,1,Dial(${p1},10,tr)
exten = 3000,2,Answer
exten = 3000,3,Background,vm/3000/unavail
exten = 3000,4,Voicemail,3000
exten = 3000,5,Hangup
;If Busy:
exten = 3000,102,Background,vm/3000/unavail
exten = 3000,103,Goto,4
[well-road]
;includes
include = voicmail access
include = extensions
include = no match
exten = h,1,Hangup

[default]

exten = s,1,Goto(well-road,3000,1)

Thanks for any help

Regards
Chris
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Boards falling out...

2004-02-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
 Has anyone else experienced this problem? What could I do to solve it
 (seat the little card a little more permanently)?

Haven't experienced it but I would think that a small bead of silicone 
sealant would hold things in place.  As the stuff cures it will release 
acetic acid but so long as you're not forcing the goop into the connectors 
(rather just around it) you should be fine.

They do make RTV silicone sealant that does not release this acid as it 
cures; look for Neutral RTV sealant but as I have said, I've *never* run 
into problems with the normal stuff and holding down electronics so long as 
you're not going out of your way to get it into the connections.

Regards,
Andrew
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Boards falling out...

2004-02-04 Thread Greg Kedrovsky
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 07:47:08AM -0700, Greg Hill wrote:
 
 Automotive parts places sell products like lok-tite (a thread locker
 compound for mechanical fasteners).

Thanks. I'll give that a try.

-Greg

-- 
Mutt 1.4.1i on Slackware 9.1 Linux
Curridabat, San Jose, Costa Rica
http://www.greg-and-sue.com/screenshot.jpg
Yahoo Instant Messenger ID: gregkedro
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Whats wrong with dialplan?

2004-02-04 Thread Florian Overkamp
Hi, 

 -Original Message-
 In the following dialplan, I am not able to press 8 to get to 
 voicemail main while the 3000 mailbox unavailable message is 
 being read in the background.
 What am I doing wrong?


You need to put the exten =  8,... Line in the same context as extensions,
otherwise it won't work like that.

During a Background play, you can access extensions in your _current_
context.


 [voicemail access]
 ;Extension 8 to get to voicmail:
 exten = 8,1,VoicemailMain
 
 [no match]
 exten = _.,1,Playback(sorry-no-match)
 exten = _.,2,Hangup
 
 [extensions]
 ;ext3000:
 exten = 3000,1,Dial(${p1},10,tr)
 exten = 3000,2,Answer
 exten = 3000,3,Background,vm/3000/unavail exten = 
 3000,4,Voicemail,3000 exten = 3000,5,Hangup ;If Busy:
 exten = 3000,102,Background,vm/3000/unavail
 exten = 3000,103,Goto,4

Florian

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cepstral TTS Code

2004-02-04 Thread Brian Capouch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feedback for the list.  I compiled Andy's code.  Installation went well
(except for me misspellng something in the dialplan) with no problems.
The Application works great.   Will run down Brian's and give it a try too.
Hope you can do us a HOWTO.

Cepstral would be a major win IMO compared to Festival.  I use Frank, 
and even though he sounds a bit effete, my customers love him.

I currently generate static GSMs and then play them.  Being able to do 
it inside asterisk would be way cool.

BTW what is Andy's code?

Thx.

B.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Whats wrong with dialplan?

2004-02-04 Thread Blake Van Eekeren
Do you evern include the [well-road] context?

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Lee
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Whats wrong with dialplan?


I am having problems with my dial plan, please help me locate the
problem:

In the following dialplan, I am not able to press 8 to get to voicemail 
main while the 3000 mailbox unavailable message is being read in the 
background.
What am I doing wrong?

[globals]
;physical-phones
p1 = SIP/p3000
p2 = SIP/p3001
p3 = SIP/p3002
p4 = some other physical phone
 

;lines
line1 = Zap/1

[voicemail access]
;Extension 8 to get to voicmail:
exten = 8,1,VoicemailMain

[no match]
exten = _.,1,Playback(sorry-no-match)
exten = _.,2,Hangup

[extensions]
;ext3000:
exten = 3000,1,Dial(${p1},10,tr)
exten = 3000,2,Answer
exten = 3000,3,Background,vm/3000/unavail
exten = 3000,4,Voicemail,3000
exten = 3000,5,Hangup
;If Busy:
exten = 3000,102,Background,vm/3000/unavail
exten = 3000,103,Goto,4

[well-road]
;includes
include = voicmail access
include = extensions
include = no match
 

exten = h,1,Hangup

[default]
 

exten = s,1,Goto(well-road,3000,1)


Thanks for any help

Regards
Chris
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 1/30/2004
 
  

---

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.576 / Virus Database: 365 - Release Date: 1/30/2004
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] IAX2 Problem

2004-02-04 Thread marin blu
Hi,

I have setup * from IAX2 and for the client the IAXphone (sokol).
When I try to call an demo-extension there is a notice:
[114696]: chan_iax2.c:4341 socket_read: rejected connect attempt from my_ip

Any idea ?

Regards,
MarinBlu
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.2

2004-02-04 Thread Mark Spencer
Asterisk 0.7.2 is now released and contains lots and lots of bug fixes
from the bug tracker.  Highly recommended for people running 0.7.1.

Mark

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Code Hosting...

2004-02-04 Thread John Todd
At 10:18 AM +0100 2/4/04, Andy Powell wrote:
lo,

Is there a single central location for code and applications other 
than CVS? I'm talking about code that can't/wont be included in CVS 
for various reasons? Does the wiki have this sort of thing? I've 
done some code for the Cepstral TTS engine (bkw has done some 
updates too) but apparently this will never make it into CVS (since 
the engine is not GPL)... Seems to make sense to have a central 
location for this type of 'outlaw' code... The bug tracker is 
useless for this sort of thing but there seem to be a number of bits 
of code like this in there

moo

Andy
Isn't this what the asterisk-addons directory was created for?  This 
is where the MySQL code was relegated after it became legally 
unfavorable to put it in the CVS main branches.

JT
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Whats wrong with dialplan?

2004-02-04 Thread Bob Klepfer
Chris Lee wrote:

I am having problems with my dial plan, please help me locate the 
problem:

In the following dialplan, I am not able to press 8 to get to 
voicemail main while the 3000 mailbox unavailable message is being 
read in the background.
What am I doing wrong?


[well-road]
;includes
include = voicmail access
include = extensions
include = no match
voicemail is misspelled - would that do it?

Bob

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] ParkAndAnnounce - Get Parking Extension

2004-02-04 Thread Carlton J. O'Riley
Is there a way to get the extension that was used to park the call using the
ParkAndAnnounce command into a variable?  Or a variable that is set?  I
would like to create an application that allows the person the call is being
announce to be able to accept the call (by pressing 1) or send the call to
voicemail by pressing (2), but I need to know what parked extension the call
is on.  If the only way is to modify the source I'm comfortable with that.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Code Hosting...

2004-02-04 Thread ast
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, John Todd wrote:

 At 10:18 AM +0100 2/4/04, Andy Powell wrote:
 
 lo,
 
 Is there a single central location for code and applications other 
 than CVS? I'm talking about code that can't/wont be included in CVS 
 for various reasons? Does the wiki have this sort of thing? I've 
 done some code for the Cepstral TTS engine (bkw has done some 
 updates too) but apparently this will never make it into CVS (since 
 the engine is not GPL)... Seems to make sense to have a central 
 location for this type of 'outlaw' code... The bug tracker is 
 useless for this sort of thing but there seem to be a number of bits 
 of code like this in there
 
 moo
 
 Andy
 
 Isn't this what the asterisk-addons directory was created for?  This 
 is where the MySQL code was relegated after it became legally 
 unfavorable to put it in the CVS main branches.

I think we need some control on what makes it into the asterisk-addons 
directory. Someone needs to do quility control so that not just anyone can 
put code there.  Maybe make a bug marshel in charge of that area (BKW ?).  
Let them control it make sure that it is current and working code.

MIchael


 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] voicemail auth failure

2004-02-04 Thread Louis-David Mitterrand
When I access voicemail remotely, from a gsm phone say, some extra
characters get inserted in my dtmf tones: when I type , *
understands 88f8f8 (it always seems to be 'f'):

-- Incorrect password '88f8f8' for user '2130' (context = any)

And the 'f' always starts after the second digit. Might it be related to
this warning message?

Feb  4 16:40:59 WARNING[622613]: res_adsi.c:234__adsi_transmit_messages: Unknown ADSI 
response 'f'

This is on debian unstable with 7.1 packages.

-- 
Every day is a gift, that's why the present is so named
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.2

2004-02-04 Thread Steve Foy
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 09:21:28AM -0600, Mark Spencer wrote:
 Asterisk 0.7.2 is now released and contains lots and lots of bug fixes
 from the bug tracker.  Highly recommended for people running 0.7.1.

Great, I was going to grab the latest CVS version after business hours today
anyway :)

Cheers,
Steve

-- 
Steve Foy|  http://www.unite.net
UNITE Solutions  |  Tel: 028 9077 7338 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: iax, trunking, etc.

2004-02-04 Thread Stephen R. Besch
Chris Clifton wrote:
The majority of sip to pstn gateway providers (vonage, voicepulse, and
others) appear to be setup for a one line only type of set up. Their web
sites seem to be heavily geared for these one line setups.
Anyone willing to comment on what type of pricing plans these providers
offer when using iax2 trunking or other methods with asterisk  to send
multiple (and possibly simultaneous) calls through their gateways ?
Voicepulse told me that there was no additional charge to enable trunking.

Stephen R. Besch

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Boards falling out...

2004-02-04 Thread Tom Walsh
 I have a TDM40B, 4-port fxs card. Each port seems to have 
 it's own little board on the fxs card. Each little board is 
 not sodered in, but rather hangs (I have a vertical case 
 for the server) on what I would call jumper pins (sorry, I'm 
 not a profession geek, just a wannabe). One of my little 
 boards, over time, slides off those jumper pins. I just 
 noticed it this morning. I had to power down, seat it, and 
 power up again. That's a pain. 
 
 We did, though, have an earthquake this morning. That may 
 have shaken things loose a bit. But, it wasn't much to speak 
 of (long, but not strong). 
 
 Has anyone else experienced this problem? What could I do to 
 solve it (seat the little card a little more permanently)? 


I haven't looked at an FXS card recently... But when we use to build
computers for shipping over seas the IDE card would unseat from the VESA
Local Bus during shipping... (God I am probably dating myself with that
one.) We would use zip ties (flexible plastic ratchet type of
fastener) to hold the cards in place.

Plastic == non-conductive and holds like a son of a gun.

Not sure if this would work with the FXS card, but just throwing out an
alternative to adhesives that might break down due to heat or other
environmental issues.

We used hot glue for a time, but the zip ties just worked much better.

Tom Walsh
Network Administrator
http://www.ala.net/


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: iax, trunking, etc.

2004-02-04 Thread ast
Nufone is setup for it and it works great


On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Stephen R. 
Besch wrote:

 Chris Clifton wrote:
  The majority of sip to pstn gateway providers (vonage, voicepulse, and
  others) appear to be setup for a one line only type of set up. Their web
  sites seem to be heavily geared for these one line setups.
  
  Anyone willing to comment on what type of pricing plans these providers
  offer when using iax2 trunking or other methods with asterisk  to send
  multiple (and possibly simultaneous) calls through their gateways ?
  
 Voicepulse told me that there was no additional charge to enable trunking.
 
 Stephen R. Besch
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] GS and NAT

2004-02-04 Thread Tomas Prybil
Matteo Brancaleoni wrote:

hi.
I've gs working under NAT,
simply put nat=yes into sip.conf section if *,
then enable nat into the gs, without any stun server.
 

If I do that (which I already have tested) * will try to initiate rtp 
with dest IP eq the inside adress ie 192.168.0.160.

BTW nat=yes  or nat=1 is treated likewise?

:(

Matteo.

Il mar, 2004-02-03 alle 21:17, Tomas Prybil ha scritto:
 

Hi all.

Is it at all possible to have a GS B101 NATed with firmware 1.0.4.40?
I've tried both STUN and not STUN. The odds seems best with stun because 
the phone registers with right ip adress.
When the connection is made * sends rtp packets to the right destination 
AND port, but the phone doesn't accept the packets.

Should I burn my D-LINK 604 or upgrade the GS?

/t
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cepstral TTS Code

2004-02-04 Thread Brian West
Andy's code and my code are the same code basically.  I cleaned up a few
things and added the noanswer option.  Other than that Andy did all of the
hard work.

bkw

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Brian Capouch wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Feedback for the list.  I compiled Andy's code.  Installation went well
  (except for me misspellng something in the dialplan) with no problems.
  The Application works great.   Will run down Brian's and give it a try too.
 

 Hope you can do us a HOWTO.

 Cepstral would be a major win IMO compared to Festival.  I use Frank,
 and even though he sounds a bit effete, my customers love him.

 I currently generate static GSMs and then play them.  Being able to do
 it inside asterisk would be way cool.

 BTW what is Andy's code?

 Thx.

 B.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: iax, trunking, etc.

2004-02-04 Thread Brian West
 Voicepulse told me that there was no additional charge to enable trunking.

GASP  SWOON!!! You received a response out of voicepulse?

bkw
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Whats wrong with dialplan?

2004-02-04 Thread Chris Lee
Bob Klepfer wrote:

voicemail is misspelled - would that do it?

Yup that fixed it, thanks for all the help

Regards
Chris
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Do you Linux softphone..

2004-02-04 Thread Chris Tooley
Would be great if I could actually download it.  It looks nice, does it
work?

On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 08:37, Walker Haddock wrote:
 The link to the download site for the softphone is:
 http://www.lipz4.com/lipz4.htm
 
 On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 08:57:00AM +, WipeOut wrote:
  An article I came across this morning..
  
  http://www.itnews.com.au/storycontent.asp?ID=12Art_ID=18128

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Newbie Question. Is asterisk right for my scenario?

2004-02-04 Thread Anthony Law
Hi,

Please excuse me if my question seems too simplistic. I have been reading
the mailing list for some time and I am still a bit confused. Here is the
scenario that I would need to achieve and am wondering if asterisk is the
correct software to use.

(h323) (h323/SIP)   (h323)
pstn---cisco--Asterisk??-cisco---pstn
|
|
| -sip phone



I have an existing h323 structure doing h323 pstn termination and would like
add sip to part of the structure, also at the same time would like asterik
to act as a softswitch to store dial plans and make routing decisions.
Asterisk at the same time will do h323/SIP translation.

My question, can Asterisk do all these? Or am I totally off?

Any comments are welcome. Many Thanks to all.



Regards,



Anthony


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] 7960 MGCP dialtone problems, part 1 [long]

2004-02-04 Thread John S.
Hi all,

I've been trying on and off again for several months to get my 7960 
(MGCP 5.3) working with * with no success.  As you know, working MGCP 
configs for non-ATA Ciscos seem to be very hard to come by.  I'm not 
shooting for the moon here, just trying to get dialtone at the moment.

The problem I'd like to focus on today: I only get dialtone when I go 
off-hook (via the Speaker button, if it matters) maybe once every 3 
tries.  If it fails, or after I've successfully gotten the dialtone 
once, the phone will not get it again until it has been power-cycled.

This is a failed attempt below.  Config files are at the bottom.  See my 
next message for a successful attempt.

=
initial registration:
=
MGCP read:
RSIP 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
RM: restart
from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
RSIP 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
RM: restart
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: 'RSIP', Identifier: '1', Endpoint: 
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]', Version: 'MGCP 1.0'
2 headers, 0 lines
Handling request 'RSIP' on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transmitting:
200 1 OK

 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP Asked to indicate tone:  on  [EMAIL PROTECTED] in 
cxmode: inactive
Posting Request:
RQNT 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
R: hd(N)
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
MGCP read:
200 2 OK

from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
200 2 OK
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: '200', Identifier: '2', Endpoint: 'OK', 
Version: '(null)'
1 headers, 0 lines

==
going offhook:
==
MGCP read:
NTFY 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
O: hd
from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
NTFY 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
O: hd
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: 'NTFY', Identifier: '2', Endpoint: 
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]', Version: 'MGCP 1.0'
3 headers, 0 lines
Handling request 'NTFY' on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transmitting:
200 2 OK

 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- Creating connection for [EMAIL PROTECTED] in cxmode: 
sendrecv callid: 5d77f7f876d91892
We're at 192.168.144.100 port 16348
Answering with capability 4
Answering with capability 8
Posting Request:
CRCX 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
C: 5d77f7f876d91892
L: p:20, a:PCMU, a:PCMA
M: sendrecv
X: 76d91892

v=0
o=root 16680 16680 IN IP4 192.168.144.100
s=session
c=IN IP4 192.168.144.100
t=0 0
m=audio 16348 RTP/AVP 0 8
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP Asked to indicate tone: dl on  [EMAIL PROTECTED] in 
cxmode: sendrecv
Posting Request:
RQNT 4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
R: hu(N), hf(N), D/[0-9#*](N)
S: dl
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP mgcp_new(MGCP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) created in state: Down
MGCP read:
200 3 OK
I: 0

v=0
o=- 7960 7960 IN IP4 192.168.144.225
s=MGCP Call
c=IN IP4 192.168.144.225
t=0 0
m=audio 26536 RTP/AVP 0 18
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
200 3 OK
I: 0
v=0
o=- 7960 7960 IN IP4 192.168.144.225
s=MGCP Call
c=IN IP4 192.168.144.225
t=0 0
m=audio 26536 RTP/AVP 0 18
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: '200', Identifier: '3', Endpoint: 'OK', 
Version: '(null)'
2 headers, 7 lines
Capabilities: us - 12, them - 260, combined - 4
Non-codec capabilities: us - 1, them - 0, combined - 0
MGCP read:
200 4 OK

from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
200 4 OK
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: '200', Identifier: '4', Endpoint: 'OK', 
Version: '(null)'
1 headers, 0 lines
MGCP read:
NTFY 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
O: hu

from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
NTFY 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
O: hu
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: 'NTFY', Identifier: '3', Endpoint: 
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]', Version: 'MGCP 1.0'
3 headers, 0 lines
Handling request 'NTFY' on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transmitting:
200 3 OK

 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- Modified [EMAIL PROTECTED] with new mode: recvonly on 
callid: 5d77f7f876d91892
Posting Request:
MDCX 5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
C: 5d77f7f876d91892
M: recvonly
X: 76d91892
I: 0
R: L/hd(N)
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP mgcp_hangup(MGCP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Delete connection 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] with new mode: 
recvonly on callid: 5d77f7f876d91892
Posting Request:
DLCX 6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
C: 5d77f7f876d91892
X: 76d91892
I: 0
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP Asked to indicate tone:  on  [EMAIL PROTECTED] in 
cxmode: recvonly
Posting Request:
RQNT 7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
R: hd(N)
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP mgcp_hangup(MGCP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) on 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] set vmwi(-)
-- MGCP Asked to indicate tone: vmwi(-) on  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
in cxmode: inactive
Posting Request:
RQNT 8 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
R: hd(N)
S: vmwi(-)
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
MGCP read:
200 5 OK
I: 0

v=0
o=- 7960 7960 IN IP4 192.168.144.225
s=MGCP Call
c=IN IP4 192.168.144.225
t=0 0
m=audio 26536 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
200 5 OK
I: 0
v=0
o=- 7960 7960 IN IP4 192.168.144.225
s=MGCP Call
c=IN IP4 192.168.144.225
t=0 0
m=audio 

[Asterisk-Users] 7960 MGCP dialtone problems, part 2 [long]

2004-02-04 Thread John S.
Hi all,

I've been trying on and off again for several months to get my 7960 
(MGCP 5.3) working with * with no success.  As you know, working MGCP 
configs for non-ATA Ciscos seem to be very hard to come by.  I'm not 
shooting for the moon here, just trying to get dialtone at the moment.

The problem I'd like to focus on today: I only get dialtone when I go 
off-hook (via the Speaker button, if it matters) maybe once every 3 
tries.  If it fails, or after I've successfully gotten the dialtone 
once, the phone will not get it again until it has been power-cycled.

This is a successful attempt below.  Config files are at the bottom.

=
initial registration:
=
MGCP read:
RSIP 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
RM: restart
from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
RSIP 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
RM: restart
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: 'RSIP', Identifier: '1', Endpoint: 
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]',

Version: 'MGCP 1.0'
2 headers, 0 lines
Handling request 'RSIP' on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transmitting:
200 1 OK
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP Asked to indicate tone:  on  [EMAIL PROTECTED] in 
cxmode: inactive
Posting Request:
RQNT 11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
R: hd(N)
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
MGCP read:
200 11 OK

from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
200 11 OK
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: '200', Identifier: '11', Endpoint: 'OK', 
Version: '(null)'
1 headers, 0 lines

===
offhook, dialtone, dial 1000, hangup;
===
MGCP read:
NTFY 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
O: hd
from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
NTFY 2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
O: hd
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: 'NTFY', Identifier: '2', Endpoint: 
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]',

Version: 'MGCP 1.0'
3 headers, 0 lines
Handling request 'NTFY' on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transmitting:
200 2 OK
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- Modified [EMAIL PROTECTED] with new mode: sendrecv on 
callid: 7e0ef17b76d91892
Posting Request:
MDCX 12 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
C: 7e0ef17b76d91892
M: sendrecv
X: 76d91892
I: 0
R: L/hu(N),L/hf(N),D/[0-9#*](N)
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP Asked to indicate tone: dl on  [EMAIL PROTECTED] in 
cxmode: sendrecv
Posting Request:
RQNT 13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
R: hu(N), hf(N), D/[0-9#*](N)
S: dl
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP mgcp_new(MGCP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) created in state: Down
MGCP read:
515 12 NO CONNECTION FOR CONNECTION ID

from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
515 12 NO CONNECTION FOR CONNECTION ID
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: '515', Identifier: '12', Endpoint: 'NO', 
Version:

'CONNECTION FOR'
1 headers, 0 lines
MGCP read:
200 13 OK
from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
200 13 OK
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: '200', Identifier: '13', Endpoint: 'OK', 
Version: '(null)'
1 headers, 0 lines
MGCP read:
NTFY 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
O: D/1

from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
NTFY 3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
O: D/1
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: 'NTFY', Identifier: '3', Endpoint: 
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]',

Version: 'MGCP 1.0'
3 headers, 0 lines
Handling request 'NTFY' on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transmitting:
200 3 OK
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP Asked to indicate tone: dl on  [EMAIL PROTECTED] in 
cxmode: sendrecv
Posting Request:
RQNT 14 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
R: hu(N), hf(N), D/[0-9#*](N)
S: dl
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP asked to indicate -1 'UNKNOWN' condition on channel

MGCP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- MGCP Asked to indicate tone:  on  [EMAIL PROTECTED] in 
cxmode: sendrecv
Posting Request:
RQNT 15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
R: hu(N), hf(N), D/[0-9#*](N)
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP asked to indicate -1 'UNKNOWN' condition on channel

MGCP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- MGCP Asked to indicate tone:  on  [EMAIL PROTECTED] in 
cxmode: sendrecv
Posting Request:
RQNT 16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
R: hu(N), hf(N), D/[0-9#*](N)
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
MGCP read:
200 14 OK

from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
200 14 OK
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: '200', Identifier: '14', Endpoint: 'OK', 
Version: '(null)'
1 headers, 0 lines
MGCP read:
200 15 OK

from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
200 15 OK
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: '200', Identifier: '15', Endpoint: 'OK', 
Version: '(null)'
1 headers, 0 lines
MGCP read:
200 16 OK

from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
200 16 OK
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: '200', Identifier: '16', Endpoint: 'OK', 
Version: '(null)'
1 headers, 0 lines
MGCP read:
NTFY 4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
O: D/0

from 192.168.144.225:2427MGCP read:
NTFY 4 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 1.0
X: 76d91892
O: D/0
from 192.168.144.225:2427Verb: 'NTFY', Identifier: '4', Endpoint: 
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]',

Version: 'MGCP 1.0'
3 headers, 0 lines
Handling request 'NTFY' on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transmitting:
200 4 OK
 to 192.168.144.225:2427
-- MGCP Asked to indicate tone:  on  [EMAIL PROTECTED] in 
cxmode: 

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Anyone used a Grandstream ATA286 with Asterisk

2004-02-04 Thread Stephen R. Besch
MLS Drop for SysAdmin wrote:

an associate of mine sent me an email of the slick sheet on this one.  I 
understand that mentioning this vendor has resulted in some 
flamethrowing on the list, and I do not want to cause trouble - just 
looking for some info.

Thanks!

Sam Z
I have one in service. It has no serious problems. The one issue we have 
had is that it adds an additional 2-wire to 4-wire hybrid and therefore 
adds an echo source that the remote end hears (varies depending upon 
what you plug into it) - and, I suspect that, because of the somewhat 
longer packet delay, the echo from this source is not well corrected by 
the * echocanceller.

Stephen R. Besch

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] talking clock

2004-02-04 Thread Tilghman Lesher
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 08:58, Brian West wrote:
 Search bugs.digium.com their was a patch for seconds but I don't
 think it was applied yet

It was applied; it's just not part of the default.  'S' is the digit
for speaking seconds.

-Tilghman

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] MeetMe questions

2004-02-04 Thread PBXtech
The Meetme needs to monitor DTMF and be able to trigger an AGI.
and
When the Meetme room is emptied it needs to be notified back to * so you 
can trigger a clean-up event or what not.

that is what i would like to see.   :)

There really aren't any.  Once you're in a conference, you can only
exit the conference, if you entered with option p specified in the
dialplan, by pressing a #.  Otherwise, the only way to exit a
conference is to hangup.
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Code Hosting...

2004-02-04 Thread Jeremy McNamara
Andy Powell wrote:

lo,

Is there a single central location for code and applications other than CVS? I'm talking about code that can't/wont be included in CVS for various reasons? Does the wiki have this sort of thing? I've done some code for the Cepstral TTS engine (bkw has done some updates too) but apparently this will never make it into CVS (since the engine is not GPL)... Seems to make sense to have a central location for this type of 'outlaw' code... The bug tracker is useless for this sort of thing but there seem to be a number of bits of code like this in there

 

I have setup http://www.sf.net/projects/asterisk and store various 
things in that CVS Repository.

Jeremy McNamara

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Newbie Question. Is asterisk right for my scenario?

2004-02-04 Thread James Sharp
 Hi,

 Please excuse me if my question seems too simplistic. I have been reading
 the mailing list for some time and I am still a bit confused. Here is the
 scenario that I would need to achieve and am wondering if asterisk is the
 correct software to use.

 (h323) (h323/SIP)   (h323)
 pstn---cisco--Asterisk??-cisco---pstn
 |
 |
 | -sip phone



 I have an existing h323 structure doing h323 pstn termination and would
 like
 add sip to part of the structure, also at the same time would like asterik
 to act as a softswitch to store dial plans and make routing decisions.
 Asterisk at the same time will do h323/SIP translation.

 My question, can Asterisk do all these? Or am I totally off?

Quite simply, yes.  Asterisk is a softswitch more than anything else.  And
it can take an incoming call on any of its available protocols (PSTN, IAX,
SIP, H323, plus many more) and route it back out any of them.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Boards falling out...

2004-02-04 Thread Stephen R. Besch
Greg Kedrovsky wrote:

I have a TDM40B, 4-port fxs card. Each port seems to have it's own
little board on the fxs card. Each little board is not sodered in, but
rather hangs (I have a vertical case for the server) on what I would
call jumper pins (sorry, I'm not a profession geek, just a wannabe). One
of my little boards, over time, slides off those jumper pins. I just
noticed it this morning. I had to power down, seat it, and power up
again. That's a pain. 

We did, though, have an earthquake this morning. That may have shaken
things loose a bit. But, it wasn't much to speak of (long, but not
strong). 

Has anyone else experienced this problem? What could I do to solve it
(seat the little card a little more permanently)? 

Thanks ahead of time.

-Greg

There are three issues here, relating to the other posts on this topic. 
  Don't use loktite. Loktite is what is called an anerobic adhesive. 
Specifically, it is catalyzed by contact with metal in the absence of 
oxygen. As such, it will only cure (in the absence of some other 
chemical activator) only down inside the pin sockets, holding them 
together. The rest will stay uncured and spread all over other stuff. 
This may essentially make them a single use contact.

The silicone is a good bet.  The acid referred to is the acetic acid 
(i.e., vinegar) released when the monomers in the RTV goo cross react to 
form the silicone. Once the cure is complete, there is no acid 
production and what was produced diffuses away. Mild acids are not 
terribly corrosive to most metals, and not at all corrosive to gold. 
The types of RTV that don't produce acid may actually produce alkali 
(ammonia), which is far more corrosive, but also diffuses away readily. 
Nevertheless, I would stick to the stuff that smells like vinegar.

Finally, I have found that the best approach is the simplest, when it 
works. If you can get one of those nylon tie-wraps around the daughter 
card in such a way as to hold it in place, this is the best - and most 
reversible approach. Sometimes, there are appropriate holes in the 
motherboard, othertimes the ty-wrap can be snaked around under the 
connector - however, don't run it under any other type of component.  I 
have even drilled holes in 2-layer circuit boards, but I would not 
advise this unless you really, really, really know what you are doing.

Finally, if the female side of pin sockets are loose enough to let the 
dayghter cards fall out, they may also be the source of noisy, 
intermittent connections.  Sockets of allmost all kinds are notorious 
for this kind of thing. I can't tell you how many times I have repaired 
a flakey circuit board by removing the sockets and soldering in all the 
(formerly) socketed chips. The square pin spring contacts in those 
connectors are only designed for a few insertion/removal cycles.  If 
that is the case, you should get a good repair tech. to replace them.

Good luck and hang in there.

Stephen R. Besch

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Voicemail volume level?

2004-02-04 Thread Rich Adamson

Are there any parameters that can bump voicemail volume up just a
little?

I can't seem to find anything but thought I'd ask the list. Normal pstn
calls via x100p's are reasonable (very little echo) and running -0.5 db 
on xmt  rcv within zapata. But using the exact same path (pstn via x100p) 
the voicemail gsm audio seems a little bit low.

options?

Rich


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Boards falling out...

2004-02-04 Thread Stephen R. Besch
Jon Pounder wrote:


nail polish and liquid-paper work fine for this sort of stuff.
Too brittle. Adhesion to metal and many plastics is marginal. Fine for 
places where there is no shock (of the physical kind). If this is 
earthquake territory, stick to the silicone or ty-wraps.

Stephen R. Besch

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Interrupted musiconhold sound when silence suppression is enabled

2004-02-04 Thread George Ye
Hi,

I am a new player of the Asterisk. I have a strage problem with musiconhold feature. Can anyone give some clues what might be the problem? A description of the problem is as follows:

1. Call from Cisco ATA 186 without silence suppression, when I push the "hold" button at the Cisco 7960 IP phone, the music plays just fine.
2. Call from Cisco ATA 186 with silence suppression enable, when I push the "hold" button of phone, the music is annoying, it cannot play smoothly. Sometimes, itplays well for a while, then there is a pause, then plays again, then pause,...

Certainly, an obvious solution is to disable silence suppression, however, this is unpracticable, because, sometimes, you might have no control of the remote side. Thanks in advance.

George
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!

[Asterisk-Users] New Search engine for the list - Final resting place

2004-02-04 Thread Kim Hendrikse
I've found a home for my new search engine of the Asterisk users mailing list.
Thanks to Linkx in the Netherlands (http://www.linkx.net) for hosting this.

There are a number of search resources for this list. This is another. This
one is a little different however, you can do a fuzzy phrase search if
desired and you can restrict the search within specific periods, from certain
users, to require certain words in the subject and other features. It's also
pretty fast.

It's subscribed to the list and will be updated daily.

Have fun.

  - Kim Hendrikse
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cepstral TTS Code

2004-02-04 Thread Andreas Anderson
Hi Brian,

Andy's code and my code are the same code basically.  I cleaned up a few
things and added the noanswer option.  Other than that Andy did all of the
hard work.
is cepstral a special tts-api, or does this mean, we can use every 
windows(tm)
tts-engine on the market...? Even ATT Natural Voices...?

Can we allready test this app, or is this a closed source thingy...?

Greez

Andreas

_
Surf the net and talk on the phone with Xtra Jetstream @  
http://www.xtra.co.nz/products/0,,5803,00.html !

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Compiling while * is running

2004-02-04 Thread Stephen R. Besch
Stephen R. Besch wrote:

I just fetched today's cvs (1/30/04 11:10:31). Compiles/installs on my 
test  machine (ASUS A7V, 900 MHZ). However, If I try to compile on my 
production machine (Elite K7S5A, 2.4GHz, 512MB) while * is running the 
zaptel and asterisk compiles seg fault. I am assuming that they will 
compile correctly if I bring down * and rmmod the zaptel driver. 0.7.1 
compiled and is now running.

Is there a way to safely compile while * is running, so that I can 
minimize down time of the server?

Here's the update on the seg fault problems.  After bad memory was 
suggested, I checked to see what memory the tech who assembled the 
machine had used. I don't know why, but the module was not in the 
recommended list for the MOBO at Crucial.com.  I ordered one of the 
recommended modules. It arrived this morning. I installed it and all of 
the seg faults are gone.  I've learned my lesson.  Next time, I will 
assemble my own machine!  Thanks again for all the help.

Stephen R. Besch

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: New Search engine for the list - Whoops!

2004-02-04 Thread Kim Hendrikse
Whoops! I forgot to mention it's location :)

Here you go:

http://asterisk.linkx.net/cgi-bin/asterisk

  - Kim Hendrikse

 I've found a home for my new search engine of the Asterisk users mailing list.
 Thanks to Linkx in the Netherlands (http://www.linkx.net) for hosting this.
 
 There are a number of search resources for this list. This is another. This
 one is a little different however, you can do a fuzzy phrase search if
 desired and you can restrict the search within specific periods, from certain
 users, to require certain words in the subject and other features. It's also
 pretty fast.
 
 It's subscribed to the list and will be updated daily.
 
 Have fun.
 
   - Kim Hendrikse
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] 7960 MGCP dialtone problems, part 1 [long]

2004-02-04 Thread Andreas Anderson
Hiya,

I've been trying on and off again for several months to get my 7960 (MGCP 
5.3) working with * with no success.  As you know, working MGCP configs for 
non-ATA Ciscos seem to be very hard to come by.  I'm not shooting for the 
moon here, just trying to get dialtone at the moment.

The problem I'd like to focus on today: I only get dialtone when I go 
off-hook (via the Speaker button, if it matters) maybe once every 3 tries.  
If it fails, or after I've successfully gotten the dialtone once, the phone 
will not get it again until it has been power-cycled.
I could not get 5.3 to work, but 6.1 seems to work. Basic Phone that is,
i don't get *any* buttons on the phone, i guess this is a problem with
CARD.XML, the only version on CCO ist for version 3.0 (!). If anyone
has a working one, please post it on the list ;-)
Regards,

aa

_
Surf the net and talk on the phone with Xtra Jetstream @  
http://www.xtra.co.nz/products/0,,5803,00.html !

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Sip flow diagram?

2004-02-04 Thread Rich Adamson

Does anyone have a high level flow diagram showing acceptable sip
messages exchanges?

For exampe:
  Source Dest
  Invite   -
   -Trying
  Ok   -

I'm specifically trying to debug an issue with various hangups, prior
to call completion, after call completion, calling vs called party
hold, etc, and getting rather confused watching the various packets
flowing between sip devices with a sniffer (and no reference document).

Rich


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Code Hosting...

2004-02-04 Thread Andy Powell

Isn't this what the asterisk-addons directory was created for?  This
is where the MySQL code was relegated after it became legally
unfavorable to put it in the CVS main branches.

JT

The code in question was actively denied entry into CVS (asterisk core or addons)

Andy


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] ParkAndAnnounce - Get Parking Extension

2004-02-04 Thread Ben Miller
Yup, the only way to do that is to modify the source.
The task of setting a channel variable to the parked slot is simple;
however, because the parkandannounce application is placing the call to
the callee to announce, it would need to have the logic of handling
the press 1 or 2 inside itself, rather than in the call plan.  Not a bad
feature, but definitely an edit to the source.
Ben

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carlton J.
O'Riley
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] ParkAndAnnounce - Get Parking Extension

Is there a way to get the extension that was used to park the call using
the
ParkAndAnnounce command into a variable?  Or a variable that is set?  I
would like to create an application that allows the person the call is
being
announce to be able to accept the call (by pressing 1) or send the call
to
voicemail by pressing (2), but I need to know what parked extension the
call
is on.  If the only way is to modify the source I'm comfortable with
that.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sip flow diagram?

2004-02-04 Thread Steve Dolloff
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_programm
ing_reference_guide_book09186a0080080221.html

Stephen Dolloff
DLS Internet Services
847-854-4799 x256
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: Rich Adamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 11:45 AM
 To: Asterisk-a-users-list
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sip flow diagram?
 
 
 Does anyone have a high level flow diagram showing acceptable sip
 messages exchanges?
 
 For exampe:
   Source Dest
   Invite   -
-Trying
   Ok   -
 
 I'm specifically trying to debug an issue with various hangups, prior
 to call completion, after call completion, calling vs called party
 hold, etc, and getting rather confused watching the various packets
 flowing between sip devices with a sniffer (and no reference
document).
 
 Rich
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sip flow diagram?

2004-02-04 Thread Regovich, Timothy
Try RFC 3261 

http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3261.html

Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 12:45 PM
To: Asterisk-a-users-list
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sip flow diagram?



Does anyone have a high level flow diagram showing acceptable sip
messages exchanges?

For exampe:
  Source Dest
  Invite   -
   -Trying
  Ok   -

I'm specifically trying to debug an issue with various hangups, prior
to call completion, after call completion, calling vs called party
hold, etc, and getting rather confused watching the various packets
flowing between sip devices with a sniffer (and no reference document).

Rich


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





--
Notice:  This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains
information of Merck  Co., Inc. (One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New
Jersey, USA 08889), and/or its affiliates (which may be known outside the
United States as Merck Frosst, Merck Sharp  Dohme or MSD and in Japan as
Banyu) that may be confidential, proprietary copyrighted and/or legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity
named on this message.  If you are not the intended recipient, and have
received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail
and then delete it from your system.
--
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Do you Linux softphone..

2004-02-04 Thread Dave Cotton
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 17:36, Chris Tooley wrote:
 Would be great if I could actually download it.  It looks nice, does it
 work?

Well after a few false starts, I've got as far as:-
it registers with * and can make calls, but for some reason doesn't
accept calls. I'll have to check configs.

On Mandrake and maybe others it looks for it's modules in the wrong
place but this fix works:-

LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/zultys/kylix3/bin softphone

I've found it easier to edit the config file directly than use  the menu
system all the time.

-- 
Dave Cotton [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Boards falling out...

2004-02-04 Thread Greg Kedrovsky
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 12:17:46PM -0500, Stephen R. Besch wrote:
 
 nail polish and liquid-paper work fine for this sort of stuff.
 
 Too brittle. Adhesion to metal and many plastics is marginal. Fine for 
 places where there is no shock (of the physical kind). If this is 
 earthquake territory, stick to the silicone or ty-wraps.

That's good to know. Thanks. Yes, it's earthquake territory. Nothing
major, be we get bounced around regularly. Volcanos - active and
inactive. The country (Costa Rica) is one big volcano. 

-Greg

-- 
Mutt 1.4.1i on Slackware 9.1 Linux
Curridabat, San Jose, Costa Rica
http://www.greg-and-sue.com/screenshot.jpg
Yahoo Instant Messenger ID: gregkedro
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Boards falling out...

2004-02-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 12:12, Colin Anderson wrote:
 I have used hot glue for many years with no problems. Decent adhesion, but
 can be picked off if ness. I showed this to a systems integrator that had
 problems with shipping PC's upside down and boards would become unseated. He
 used this on thousands of systems and the problem was eliminated. 

Hmm, sounds like something the Digium resellers could do. I can see the
commercial now

cheesy announcer voice
Is your access to insert local emergency number important to you. Do
you want to not have to go looking for your tools in the middle of an
emergency. For the low low cost of $29.99, we will throw in a hot glue
gun and 3 sticks of glue to solve all those earthquake related failures.
/cheesy announcer voice

 -Original Message-
 From: Stephen R. Besch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:14 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Boards falling out...
 
 
 Greg Kedrovsky wrote:
 
  I have a TDM40B, 4-port fxs card. Each port seems to have it's own
  little board on the fxs card. Each little board is not sodered in, but
  rather hangs (I have a vertical case for the server) on what I would
  call jumper pins (sorry, I'm not a profession geek, just a wannabe). One
  of my little boards, over time, slides off those jumper pins. I just
  noticed it this morning. I had to power down, seat it, and power up
  again. That's a pain. 
  
  We did, though, have an earthquake this morning. That may have shaken
  things loose a bit. But, it wasn't much to speak of (long, but not
  strong). 
  
  Has anyone else experienced this problem? What could I do to solve it
  (seat the little card a little more permanently)? 
  
  Thanks ahead of time.
  
  -Greg
  
 There are three issues here, relating to the other posts on this topic. 
Don't use loktite. Loktite is what is called an anerobic adhesive. 
 Specifically, it is catalyzed by contact with metal in the absence of 
 oxygen. As such, it will only cure (in the absence of some other 
 chemical activator) only down inside the pin sockets, holding them 
 together. The rest will stay uncured and spread all over other stuff. 
 This may essentially make them a single use contact.
 
 The silicone is a good bet.  The acid referred to is the acetic acid 
 (i.e., vinegar) released when the monomers in the RTV goo cross react to 
 form the silicone. Once the cure is complete, there is no acid 
 production and what was produced diffuses away. Mild acids are not 
 terribly corrosive to most metals, and not at all corrosive to gold. 
 The types of RTV that don't produce acid may actually produce alkali 
 (ammonia), which is far more corrosive, but also diffuses away readily. 
 Nevertheless, I would stick to the stuff that smells like vinegar.
 
 Finally, I have found that the best approach is the simplest, when it 
 works. If you can get one of those nylon tie-wraps around the daughter 
 card in such a way as to hold it in place, this is the best - and most 
 reversible approach. Sometimes, there are appropriate holes in the 
 motherboard, othertimes the ty-wrap can be snaked around under the 
 connector - however, don't run it under any other type of component.  I 
 have even drilled holes in 2-layer circuit boards, but I would not 
 advise this unless you really, really, really know what you are doing.
 
 Finally, if the female side of pin sockets are loose enough to let the 
 dayghter cards fall out, they may also be the source of noisy, 
 intermittent connections.  Sockets of allmost all kinds are notorious 
 for this kind of thing. I can't tell you how many times I have repaired 
 a flakey circuit board by removing the sockets and soldering in all the 
 (formerly) socketed chips. The square pin spring contacts in those 
 connectors are only designed for a few insertion/removal cycles.  If 
 that is the case, you should get a good repair tech. to replace them.
 
 Good luck and hang in there.
 
 Stephen R. Besch
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Steven Critchfield  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 bug in 6.1 evident in Asterisk

2004-02-04 Thread John Todd
Yes and no.  The Cisco phone is on a NAT network that is quite 
distant from one of the Asterisk servers, but on the same wire as the 
other.  Three lines go to the remote *, and three lines remain local 
on the network to the other * server.  I'm running CVS as of this 
morning on both servers.  Strangely, today the phone hasn't locked up 
or rebooted, though now I am getting one or two of the lines failing 
to REGISTER - they're simply not sending out a request, according to 
the network dump.  sigh

JT

At 7:43 AM -0600 2/4/04, Brian West wrote:
Question.. is the 7960 on the same subnet as your asterisk server?  I have
a 7960 registered with 3 diffrent asterisk servers.  All 6 lines.  Running
6.1 and has 12 days of uptime.
bkw

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, John Todd wrote:

 So, I've managed to consistently lock up my Cisco 7960 (SIP 6.1) to
 the point where it needs to be unplugged, due to software errors.
 This is a first.
 My suspicions are that this bug in Asterisk is causing the lockups:
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=889
 It seems unusual to me that a low volume of bogus SIP messages should
 lock up the 7960, but that seems to be the case.   It seems this only
 happens on my 7960 that I have completely full of extensions (all six
 line buttons are lit, two of them are auto-answer.)   I think this is
 one bug tickling another bug; bad messages from * are killing the
 7960.
 I'd like anyone else with experiences with this  type of failure with
 Asterisk to give me a shout; I'm going to report this to Cisco
 somehow, but don't have enough evidence.
  JT

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sip flow diagram?

2004-02-04 Thread Bob Knight
Rich Adamson wrote:

Does anyone have a high level flow diagram showing acceptable sip
messages exchanges?
For exampe:
 Source Dest
 Invite   -
  -Trying
 Ok   -

I'm specifically trying to debug an issue with various hangups, prior
to call completion, after call completion, calling vs called party
hold, etc, and getting rather confused watching the various packets
flowing between sip devices with a sniffer (and no reference document).
Rich

 

It may be a little verbose, but you can find it in the rfc 3261 as a start.

--
Bob Knight
[-w] the work option
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
925-449-9163
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cepstral TTS Code

2004-02-04 Thread Brian West
No it uses the linux theta libs and header files.

bkw

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Andreas Anderson wrote:

 Hi Brian,

 Andy's code and my code are the same code basically.  I cleaned up a few
 things and added the noanswer option.  Other than that Andy did all of the
 hard work.

 is cepstral a special tts-api, or does this mean, we can use every
 windows(tm)
 tts-engine on the market...? Even ATT Natural Voices...?

 Can we allready test this app, or is this a closed source thingy...?


 Greez

 Andreas

 _
 Surf the net and talk on the phone with Xtra Jetstream @
 http://www.xtra.co.nz/products/0,,5803,00.html !

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cepstral TTS Code

2004-02-04 Thread Brian West
http://asterisk.bkw.org/other/cepstral.tar.gz

bkw

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Brian Capouch wrote:

 I'm prolly showing my ignorance here, but where *is* this code?

 I've done a search at the bugs site and it came up dry.  It's not in the
 CVS contrib tree.

 Don't know where else to look.

 Thx.

 B.
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk 0.7.2

2004-02-04 Thread Miguel Cavazos
would be a good idea to put it on the changelog, i see its there but it
doesnt really inform nothing.

Miguel Cavazos
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 15:21, Mark Spencer wrote:
 Asterisk 0.7.2 is now released and contains lots and lots of bug fixes
 from the bug tracker.  Highly recommended for people running 0.7.1.
 
 Mark
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Sip flow diagram?

2004-02-04 Thread Christian Stredicke
You can find some examples here:

http://www.iptel.org/info/players/ietf/callflows/

Enjoy reading... SIP is like poetry!

Christian

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
 Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 6:45 PM
 To: Asterisk-a-users-list
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Sip flow diagram?
 
 
 Does anyone have a high level flow diagram showing acceptable sip
 messages exchanges?
 
 For exampe:
   Source Dest
   Invite   -
-Trying
   Ok   -
 
 I'm specifically trying to debug an issue with various hangups, prior
 to call completion, after call completion, calling vs called party
 hold, etc, and getting rather confused watching the various packets
 flowing between sip devices with a sniffer (and no reference document).
 
 Rich
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Code Hosting...

2004-02-04 Thread William Waites
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:18:10AM +0100, Andy Powell wrote:
 but apparently this will never make it into CVS
 (since the engine is not GPL)...

GPL code is not allowed in the Digium CVS repository.
Only split-licensed code is.

/w
-- 
/~\  The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
\ /No HTML/RTF in email
 X No Word docs in email
/ \  Respect for open standards
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asuscom HiSax based ISDN BRI card - one way latency

2004-02-04 Thread Martin 'poorman' Klozik
Hi all,

I have configured Asterisk server with Asuscom ISDN card and 1 port TDM10B 
card. ISDN card is based on HiSax chipset and it runs with hisax kernel 
module. When call from 'zap/1' phone (or any SIP client) to PSTN is connected 
next behaviour occurs:

- PSTN station hears 'zap/1' with latency (about 1 sec)
- 'zap/1' hears PSTN station without latency

I've spent a lot of time by tracing the cause. A few minutes ago I've find 
something really strange. When kernel module is loaded and asterisk run (e.g. 
asterisk -c) it works fine. Once you connect to running asterisk server by 
'asterisk -r' then one way latency starts! The only way to get a rid of 
latency is to stop asterisk, remove hisax module and start all again.

I've tested Asuscom ISDN card (HiSax: HFC-PCI card manufacturer: 
Asuscom/Askey) and Eicon Diva (HiSax: Eicon.Diehl Diva driver Rev. 1.1.4.2).
Asuscom works as described. With Eicon card there is no latency at all. It 
doesn't matter if remote connection to asterisk was made or not.

Any ideas why remote connection to asterisk server confuses Asuscom ISDN card? 
Why Eicon Diva is not affected? It uses the same chipset and kernel module...

My configuration:
PC: Athlon XP 2200+, 512MB RAM, Debian-stable (Woody), Kernel 2.4.22
Asterisk - updating continuously from CVS - I get the same behaviour over two 
months
modem.conf is as follows (nothing special):
[interfaces]
driver=i4l
type=autodetect
dialtype=tone
mode=immediate
stripmsd=0
group=1
msn=xx
context=isdn
device = /dev/ttyI0
device = /dev/ttyI1

Thank you, poorman

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco 7960 bug in 6.1 evident in Asterisk

2004-02-04 Thread Brian West
Does the first line, backup and emergency proxy go to the * box on the
same wire?  Malcolm and I figured out the 7960's freak smooth out if the
asterisk server isn't on the same subnet his phones kept rebooting over
and over and over till we took them off the switch they were on and move
them to the one with the aterisk server.

bkw

On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, John Todd wrote:

 Yes and no.  The Cisco phone is on a NAT network that is quite
 distant from one of the Asterisk servers, but on the same wire as the
 other.  Three lines go to the remote *, and three lines remain local
 on the network to the other * server.  I'm running CVS as of this
 morning on both servers.  Strangely, today the phone hasn't locked up
 or rebooted, though now I am getting one or two of the lines failing
 to REGISTER - they're simply not sending out a request, according to
 the network dump.  sigh

 JT


 At 7:43 AM -0600 2/4/04, Brian West wrote:
 
 Question.. is the 7960 on the same subnet as your asterisk server?  I have
 a 7960 registered with 3 diffrent asterisk servers.  All 6 lines.  Running
 6.1 and has 12 days of uptime.
 
 bkw
 
 On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, John Todd wrote:
 
 
   So, I've managed to consistently lock up my Cisco 7960 (SIP 6.1) to
   the point where it needs to be unplugged, due to software errors.
   This is a first.
 
   My suspicions are that this bug in Asterisk is causing the lockups:
  http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=889
 
   It seems unusual to me that a low volume of bogus SIP messages should
   lock up the 7960, but that seems to be the case.   It seems this only
   happens on my 7960 that I have completely full of extensions (all six
   line buttons are lit, two of them are auto-answer.)   I think this is
   one bug tickling another bug; bad messages from * are killing the
   7960.
 
   I'd like anyone else with experiences with this  type of failure with
   Asterisk to give me a shout; I'm going to report this to Cisco
   somehow, but don't have enough evidence.
 
JT
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Audio code registration

2004-02-04 Thread Roy

I am pulling my hair out trying to get an AUdiocodes MP-108 FXO gateway to
register.  I set it up like some of my other phones but keep getting errors.
Here is the SIP debug.  Any pointers would be appreciated.



10 headers, 0 lines
Message is NOTIFY
Sip read:
REGISTER sip:216.139.32.179 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.139.30.77;branch=z9hG4bKacgKAyfjp
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=1c25733
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 208177 REGISTER
Expires: 180
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];user=phone;expires=180
Content-Length: 0


9 headers, 0 lines
Using latest request as basis request
Sending to 216.139.30.77 : 5060 (non-NAT)
Transmitting (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.139.30.77;branch=z9hG4bKacgKAyfjp
From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=1c25733
To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as4fe5fd3a
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 208177 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Length: 0

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >