Re: [Asterisk-Users] [Fwd: Call Transfer between phones]

2004-11-29 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Michael Nolan wrote:
Receive call, press flash, call other party, wait for answer, press
transfer, hangup.

Yes, assuming fairly recent firmware (1.0.5.16+).  That does an
attended transfer.  To blind transfer you can just press transfer
exten send and hangup.

Question: I saw on the Wiki a report that 1.0.5.16 message button does 
not play well with Asterisk and sends a broken NOTIFY. Is that true?

Anyone here have been using 1.0.5.16 (or later?) and care to comment on 
problems he or she may be having?

The reason is that I have a working setup here, except the attended 
transfer and I'm willing to upgrade the firmware to get that extra 
feature but not if it breaks something that already works... :-)

Thanks!
Gilad
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Codefidence. A name you can trust(tm)
Web: http://codefidence.com  | SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +972.9.8650475 ext. 201 | Fax:  +972.9.8850643
I am Jack's Overwritten Stack Pointer
-- Hackers Club, the movie
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OS Choice ?

2004-11-29 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef
Alex Brecher wrote:
Which Distro is the most commonly used distro with Asterisk please ?
I don't know which is most commonly used, but I can tell you which is 
the easiest to install if you're going to install the OS from scratch 
anyway and plan to use it with Asterisk:

Xorcom Rapid is a Debian/Asterisk distribution program that includes an 
auto-install and special auto-configuration features. It quickly and 
effortlessly converts any PC to a functioning Asterisk PBX...

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Xorcom+Rapid
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Codefidence. A name you can trust(tm)
Web: http://codefidence.com  | SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +972.9.8650475 ext. 201 | Fax:  +972.9.8850643
I am Jack's Overwritten Stack Pointer
-- Hackers Club, the movie
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom Reboot Script PRI errors!!

2004-11-29 Thread Simon Brown
Kevin wrote:
 There is a reboot script posted on the wiki to reboot Polycom 
 telephones.  When I execute this script, I get the following messages.
 I am concerned as this is causing issues with asterisk and the PRI.
 Does anyone have any ideas why this would be happening?
 
 
 
 asterisk console:
 
 -- Remote UNIX connection
 -- Remote UNIX connection disconnected
 
 and in the Asterisk Log:
 
 Nov 28 22:30:42 NOTICE[1099909936]: PRI got event: 6 on Primary 
 D-channel of span 1 Nov 28 22:43:08 NOTICE[1099909936]: PRI got event: 
 6 on Primary D-channel of span 1
 
 
 Script:
 
 #!/usr/bin/perl -w
 
 use Net::Ping;
 use Socket;
 
 $polycompath = '/home//';# Where you keep your config files
 $arp = '/sbin/arp';  # Location of arp command
 $sipserver   = '192.168.XXX.XXX';  # IP of asterisk server
 
 $phone = shift;
 
 checkphone($phone);
 touch( arp2config($phone) );
 
 reboot_sip_phone( $phone, $sipserver, Reboot );
 
 sub checkphone { # Checks for existence of phone, makes sure
  # it's in arp table
 $activephone = shift;
 
 # Populate ARP table
 print Checking ARP table.\n;
 $p = Net::Ping-new(icmp);
 if ( $p-ping( $activephone, 2 ) ) {
 print $activephone is ;
 print reachable.\n;
 }
 else { die Polycom at , $activephone,  is not reachable!; }
 sleep(1);
 $p-close();
 
 }
 
 sub arp2config {# Gets mac address from arp table, converts
 # to a polycom config filename, makes sure
 # the config file exists
 $arpip = shift;
 open( ARP, $arp -an| ) || die Couldn't open arp table: $!\n;
 print checking for polycom config name..., \n;
 while (ARP) {
 chomp;
 $addr = $_;
 $ip   = $_;
 $addr =~ s/.*
 ([\d\w]+:[\d\w]+:[\d\w]+:[\d\w]+:[\d\w]+:[\d\w]+).*/$1/;
 $addr =~ s/://g;
 $addr = lc($addr) . '.cfg';
 $ip =~ s/.*?(\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+).*/$1/;
 if ( $ip eq $arpip ) {
 last;
 }
 }
 
 $polycomconfig = $polycompath . $addr;
 
 unless ( -e $polycomconfig ) {
 print sorry, polycom config file , $polycomconfig,
is not found.\n\n;
 exit;
 }
 
 return $polycomconfig;
 }
 
 sub touch {# We need to touch the config files or the phone
# won't reboot - it depends on time synchronization
 
 print touching config file , $polycomconfig, \n;
 my $now = time;
 local (*TMP);
 foreach my $file (@_) {
 utime( $now, $now, $file )
   || open( TMP, $file )
   || die ($0: Couldn't touch file: $!\n);
 }
 }
 
 sub reboot_sip_phone {# Send the phone a check-sync to reboot it
 $phone_ip = shift;
 
 $local_ip = shift;
 $sip_to   = shift;
 $sip_from = 0;
 $tm   = time();
 $call_id  = $tm . msgto$sip_to;
 $httptime = `date -R`;
 $MESG = NOTIFY sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0
 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP $local_ip
 From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Event: check-sync
 Date: $httptime
 Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CSeq: 1300 NOTIFY
 Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Length: 0
 
 ;
 
 $proto = getprotobyname('udp');
 socket( SOCKET, PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, $proto );
 $iaddr = inet_aton($phone_ip);
 $paddr = sockaddr_in( 5060, $iaddr );
 bind( SOCKET, $paddr );
 $port = 5060;
 
 $hisiaddr = inet_aton($phone_ip);
 $hispaddr = sockaddr_in( $port, $hisiaddr );
 
 if ( send( SOCKET, $MESG, 0, $hispaddr ) ) {
 print reboot of phone , $phone_ip,  was successful, \n;
 }
 else { print reboot of phone , $phone_ip,  failed, \n; }
 
 }
 exit;
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 


Kevin -

I rewrote this some time ago because of some issues with Polycom's latest
bootroom/sip update.  Try this:

Also, serctl, part of the ser package, has a cisco_restart parameter that
works on Polycoms as well.

John



#!/usr/bin/perl -w

use Net::Ping;
use Socket;

$polycompath = '/home/PlcmSpIp/';# Where you keep your polycom files
$arp = '/sbin/arp';  # Location of arp command
$sipserver   = '192.168.XXX.XXX';  # IP of asterisk server

$phone = shift;

checkphone($phone);
touch( arp2config($phone) );

reboot_sip_phone( $phone, $sipserver, get_extension($phone) );

sub checkphone { # Checks for existence of phone, 
makes sure
 # it's in arp table
 $activephone = shift;

 # Populate ARP table
 print Checking ARP table.\n;
 $p = Net::Ping-new(icmp);
 if ( $p-ping( $activephone, 2 ) ) {
 print $activephone is ;
 print reachable.\n;
 }
 else { die Polycom at , $activephone,  is not reachable!; }

Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP to IP call without server?

2004-11-29 Thread Wilson Pickett
 What's the diff. between FWD and Skype other than Skype uses proprietary
 solution? I'm getting a little confused with these softphones and
 provider companies. I cant tell what's so great of one from the other.
 Is there something special about FWD I'm missing that make it better
 than other solution like Skype? Thanks!

Skype can only work with their software AFAIK. FWD works with many,
many clients.

The most important issue with Skype is that is works with no
adjustments to your computer and it doesn't care about NAT routers. It
also is supposedly encrypted end to end and has built in free
conferencing for some small limited number of users. Since it's free
and one wouldn't be likely to build a huge commercial app around it,
it makes no difference that it is proprietory, you'd just drop it if
it no longer works for you.

FWD and many other free services will also work and they use a
standard protocol (SIP) to set your session up. They will all require
some screwing around to get them to work and I have never tried one
that worked anywhere near as reliably or with as good quality as
Skype.

Skype is the Microsoft of voIP in some ways ;)

However, discussing skype and ip to ip calling is not the subject of
this list, so I'll now shut up.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Billing of outoging calls via CAPI

2004-11-29 Thread Rastislav Lukac
Hi Patrick,

exactly, i am looking for something like AOC.
The CDR offers just billing seconds and this is not enough
because additionaly i would need rate-tables to calculate
accurate price of the outgoing call. hmm...and is not what i want.

Maybe there is a way to catch the billing information
from D-channel. Is there any standalone application
for linux, which is able to filter these charging informations
when the Asterisk can't do that?

Regards
Rastislav




On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 10:35 +0100, Rastislav Lukac wrote:

 Hello all,

 I would like to get billing/charging informations of all
 outgoing calls of any PSTN numbers made with my IP-Phone via asterisk.

Asterisk automatically generates CDR's (Call Detail Records). They are
stored in cdr-csv (or a database if you want it there).

 Can I obtain in * an accurate charge information of outgoing call via CAPI
which
 destination is any PSTN number?

I think you are referring to AOC (Advice of Charge) and afaik chan_capi
does not support that nor does the CDR generation code.

 Does the ISDN signal contain charging informations ?

Depends on your telco but if Asterisk does not support AOC, it will not
matter...

Regards,
Patrick


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Dial plan for TDM22B

2004-11-29 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
I finally got the TDM22B to work.
Just for the rcord. The problem was, that I did not see the zaptel.conf 
and created a new one in /etc/asterisk, however /etc/zaptel.conf 
existed, 

Now I am trying to setup the dial plan for these 4 ports of the TDM22B. 
I face with my extension.conf following problems:
601 (on an ATA-186) can reach 603 / 604 (on the TDM22B)
603 or 604 cannot dial anything !!!

dailing in from the PSTN results in You have configured Asterisk ...  
- You can stop it by dialing the extension number you want.

Unfortunately you also can dial to a remote line (UK, USA) ...
[incoming_88097680]
exten = _**7680,1,Ringing
exten = _**7680,2,Answer
exten = _**7680,3,Dial(SIP/601,20,r)
exten = _**7680,4,Voicemail,u601
exten = _**7680,105,Voicemail,b601
[incoming_88097074]
exten = _**7074,1,Ringing
exten = _**7074,2,NoOp
exten = _**7074,3,Dial(SIP/601,20,r)
exten = _**7074,4,Voicemail,u601
exten = _**7074,105,Voicemail,b601
[TDM22B]
exten = 603,1,Dial(ZAP/1,60,tr)
exten = 603,2,Voicemail,u603
exten = 603,102,Voicemail,b603
exten = 604,1,Dial(ZAP/2,60,tr)
exten = 604,2,Voicemail,u604
exten = 604,102,Voicemail,b604
I also did not find a document about possible options (like t, T, m, r 
 ) . What does the ** mean ??? (I guess it means anything ending 
with the numbers)

bye
Ronald
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Audio Drops out at Random - one way

2004-11-29 Thread Craig Waddington








Have a strange problem.



2 different asterisk servers, running different CVS. 



One behind Firewall, one not.



Cisco 7940 phones.



Over the past two weeks, users have had a problem with one
way audio, after about 2 minutes into a call, they can hear the other person,
but the other person cannot hear them, this happens for about 3-5 seconds, then
all is fine again.



It doesnt happen on every call, about one in 5. 



Hardware is good, 2mb Connection, QOS enabled.



If it was only one Asterisk server I would be ok, but it
happens on two completely different places.



I cannot work out what is causing it, can anyone offer
anyone offer a solution or a method to track this down.



Thanks.






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Problem when I call someone who is busy

2004-11-29 Thread Nelington Anthony
Hi,

My setup is quite complicated.
I have to Asterisk server linked via IAX. 
My Sip phones are connected to one and go out (PSTN)
via the IAX trunk and the other server is connected to
a Quintum CMS via H323.

Phone---(SIP)---Asterisk1---(IAX)---Asterisk2--(H323)---CMS--
PSTN

All work fine but when a call someone who is busy I
didn't hear the corresponding tone and asterisk2 go to
timeout and after asterisk1.
In my log the call is well routed through the two
asterisk server.
I don't know what is the problem so if you have any
idea ?

Thanks in advance !

Anthony








Vous manquez d’espace pour stocker vos mails ? 
Yahoo! Mail vous offre GRATUITEMENT 100 Mo !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.benefits.yahoo.com/

Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour 
dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis. A télécharger gratuitement sur 
http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] low quality sound samples

2004-11-29 Thread Corvin
Hi,

I'm testing Asterisk installation on my Slackware Linux Box,
I am making calls from kphone. I've noticed that standard sample
voice files attached to * distro (*.gdm files) havn't good quality.
What can be done to improve it? I'm using alsa drivers.

BR,
Corvin  
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] low quality sound samples

2004-11-29 Thread Corvin

 voice files attached to * distro (*.gdm files) havn't good quality.

sorry I meant *gsm files
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Audio Drops out at Random - one way

2004-11-29 Thread Craig Waddington








Sorry forgot to mention this is with IAX2
only, SIP works fine.











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Waddington
Sent: 29 November 2004 10:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Audio
Drops out at Random - one way





Have a strange problem.



2 different asterisk servers, running different CVS. 



One behind Firewall, one not.



Cisco 7940 phones.



Over the past two weeks, users have had a problem with one
way audio, after about 2 minutes into a call, they can hear the other person,
but the other person cannot hear them, this happens for about 3-5 seconds, then
all is fine again.



It doesnt happen on every call, about one in 5. 



Hardware is good, 2mb Connection, QOS enabled.



If it was only one Asterisk server I would be ok, but it
happens on two completely different places.



I cannot work out what is causing it, can anyone offer
anyone offer a solution or a method to track this down.



Thanks.






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Billing of outoging calls via CAPI

2004-11-29 Thread Patrick
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 10:58 +0100, Rastislav Lukac wrote:
[snip]
 Maybe there is a way to catch the billing information
 from D-channel. Is there any standalone application
 for linux, which is able to filter these charging informations
 when the Asterisk can't do that?

I don't know. Seems difficult to have a standalone app catch AOC info
while Asterisk needs the ISDN link also. You can ask junghanns.net of
they are willing to add AOC support to chan_capi (Possibly at a fee).

Regards,
Patrick
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] unable to compile testcpuid.c in spandsp in x86_64

2004-11-29 Thread Michael Welter
Steven Hi,
I'm unable to compile testcpuid.c with the __x86_64__ architecture 
(Athlon 64 processor).  The messages are:

/tmp/ccONleRV.s: Assembly messages:
/tmp/ccONleRV.s: Error: suffix or operands invalid for 'pushf'
 'pop'
 'push'
 'popf'
Is it safe to ignore this module?
When I attempt to start asterisk, libspandsp.so.0 fails to load because 
'top_bit' is undefined.  Is this related to the compile problem?

Thanks for your help,
--
Michael Welter
Introspect Telephony Corp.
Denver, Colorado US
+1.303.674.2575
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.introspect.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] [Fwd: Call Transfer between phones]

2004-11-29 Thread Craig Guy
Yes, 1.0.5.16 breaks the message button.  1.0.5.18 fixes the message button
but shows a 403 error 'bout once an hour.

Craig

- Original Message - 
From: Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Nolan [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing
List - Non-Commercial Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] [Fwd: Call Transfer between phones]


 Michael Nolan wrote:

 Receive call, press flash, call other party, wait for answer, press
 transfer, hangup.
 

  Yes, assuming fairly recent firmware (1.0.5.16+).  That does an
  attended transfer.  To blind transfer you can just press transfer
  exten send and hangup.



 Question: I saw on the Wiki a report that 1.0.5.16 message button does
 not play well with Asterisk and sends a broken NOTIFY. Is that true?

 Anyone here have been using 1.0.5.16 (or later?) and care to comment on
 problems he or she may be having?

 The reason is that I have a working setup here, except the attended
 transfer and I'm willing to upgrade the firmware to get that extra
 feature but not if it breaks something that already works... :-)

 Thanks!
 Gilad


 -- 
 Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Codefidence. A name you can trust(tm)
 Web: http://codefidence.com  | SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Tel: +972.9.8650475 ext. 201 | Fax:  +972.9.8850643

 I am Jack's Overwritten Stack Pointer
 -- Hackers Club, the movie
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple EICON Diva 2.01 PCI ISDN cards with Asterisk - possible?

2004-11-29 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Hello,
I'm thinking of deploying Asterisk.
I already have a handful of EICON Diva 2.01 PCI ISDN cards.
I was thinking if it's possible to insert 4 such cards to my 
PC-Asterisk server (which I yet have to install) and use them as 4 
lines in case anyone has to call me in / I have to call out using ISDN 
line(s)?

 From what I have been told on this very list you can only use Diva 
Server cards with asterisk because the 'cheaper' diva cards do not 
support some stuff called 'capi'.
It appears they have been wrong.
I just checked on www.capi.org, and Eicon Diva 2.0 PCI cards offers CAPI 
2.0...

This same page says this card is is not Linux compatibile, though, but 
it is.

Tomek
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Audio Drops out at Random - one way

2004-11-29 Thread WipeOut
Craig Waddington wrote:
Have a strange problem.
2 different asterisk servers, running different CVS.
One behind Firewall, one not.
Cisco 7940 phones.
Over the past two weeks, users have had a problem with one way audio, 
after about 2 minutes into a call, they can hear the other person, but 
the other person cannot hear them, this happens for about 3-5 seconds, 
then all is fine again.

It doesnt happen on every call, about one in 5.
Hardware is good, 2mb Connection, QOS enabled.
If it was only one Asterisk server I would be ok, but it happens on 
two completely different places.

I cannot work out what is causing it, can anyone offer anyone offer a 
solution or a method to track this down.

Thanks.

 

I have a similar problem with my IAX connection to my termination 
provider.. No one seems to be able to help and I have replaced or 
reinstalled just about every component in the chain except the internet 
itself and the termination provider..

Have updated Asterisk to 1.0.2, have added a switch to my network (was 
using a hub), have changes to a different firewall, have setup port 
mapping through the NAT, have tried different DSL routers and put in a 
high quality microfilter..

So the only things I think it can be are a) my termination provider (but 
they service many people and I am sure others would have brought it up 
if it was a problem), b) Asterisk itself or c) my DSL line or ISP..

Unfortunately these are all hard to check and the debug logging on 
Asterisk didn't help much when I tried looking at it..

I know this doesn't help much but if you come up with anything please 
let me know.. Its driving us crazy having calls drop on us especially 
when talking to customers..

Later..
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dial plan for TDM22B

2004-11-29 Thread Garry Taylor
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Ronald Wiplinger
 Sent: Monday, 29 November 2004 6:35 PM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Dial plan for TDM22B
 
 
 I finally got the TDM22B to work.
 Just for the rcord. The problem was, that I did not see the 
 zaptel.conf 
 and created a new one in /etc/asterisk, however /etc/zaptel.conf 
 existed, 
 
 
 Now I am trying to setup the dial plan for these 4 ports of 
 the TDM22B. 
 I face with my extension.conf following problems:
 601 (on an ATA-186) can reach 603 / 604 (on the TDM22B)
 603 or 604 cannot dial anything !!!
 
 dailing in from the PSTN results in You have configured 
 Asterisk ...  
 - You can stop it by dialing the extension number you want.
 
 Unfortunately you also can dial to a remote line (UK, USA) ...
 
 [incoming_88097680]
 exten = _**7680,1,Ringing
 exten = _**7680,2,Answer
 exten = _**7680,3,Dial(SIP/601,20,r)
 exten = _**7680,4,Voicemail,u601
 exten = _**7680,105,Voicemail,b601
 
 [incoming_88097074]
 exten = _**7074,1,Ringing
 exten = _**7074,2,NoOp
 exten = _**7074,3,Dial(SIP/601,20,r)
 exten = _**7074,4,Voicemail,u601
 exten = _**7074,105,Voicemail,b601
 
 [TDM22B]
 exten = 603,1,Dial(ZAP/1,60,tr)
 exten = 603,2,Voicemail,u603
 exten = 603,102,Voicemail,b603
 exten = 604,1,Dial(ZAP/2,60,tr)
 exten = 604,2,Voicemail,u604
 exten = 604,102,Voicemail,b604
 
 
 I also did not find a document about possible options (like 
 t, T, m, r 
  ) . What does the ** mean ??? (I guess it means 
 anything ending 
 with the numbers)

Actually, * is not a wildcard, . is the asterisk wildcard. 
The problem that you have here is that you are assuming that the PSTN passes
calling ID and it does not. Calling ID can only be passed on a PRI or BRI
(ISDN) interface. So all you receive on a ZAP interface is caller ID. Since
there is no calling ID (as you expect), incoming calls must go the the s
extention. Here is what I use on a TDM22B -
; incoming calls from the PSTN should come here
[incoming]
exten = s,1,Wait(1) ;wait to get caller ID in.
exten = s,2,Dial(SIP/102,20)
exten = s,3,Voicemail(u102)
exten = s,102,Voicemail(b102)
exten = s,103,Hangup

Not sure what you mean by 603 and 604 cannot dial anything, they should be
able to dial each other based on the config you have here. Maybe you have
errors in other parts of your config?

 
 
 bye
 
 Ronald
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster isk-users
 To 
 UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Audio Drops out at Random - one way

2004-11-29 Thread Craig Waddington
I found this:

http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2003-May/000764.html

But it is old, and I am sure lots of changes have been made to the
source, since then.

Where and how do you set absolutetimeout=0, would this help?

A test I want to perform is, we make a call, and say nothing for 20
seconds, and see if that's why the audio stream is being dropped. ???

What I am doing currently is running debug IAX2 when users make a call,
to try pinpoint the issue, but I don't know what I am looking for in the
output.

Are you using Cisco Phones? If so, what firmware, that is the only
common thing at my end.

This install worked fine for months, the audio issue has just started
occurring.

The quality is perfect, except this loss of Audio for a few seconds.

Is your problem purely outgoing?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WipeOut
Sent: 29 November 2004 13:01
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Audio Drops out at Random - one way

Craig Waddington wrote:

 Have a strange problem.

 2 different asterisk servers, running different CVS.

 One behind Firewall, one not.

 Cisco 7940 phones.

 Over the past two weeks, users have had a problem with one way audio, 
 after about 2 minutes into a call, they can hear the other person, but

 the other person cannot hear them, this happens for about 3-5 seconds,

 then all is fine again.

 It doesn't happen on every call, about one in 5.

 Hardware is good, 2mb Connection, QOS enabled.

 If it was only one Asterisk server I would be ok, but it happens on 
 two completely different places.

 I cannot work out what is causing it, can anyone offer anyone offer a 
 solution or a method to track this down.

 Thanks.

---
-

  


I have a similar problem with my IAX connection to my termination 
provider.. No one seems to be able to help and I have replaced or 
reinstalled just about every component in the chain except the internet 
itself and the termination provider..

Have updated Asterisk to 1.0.2, have added a switch to my network (was 
using a hub), have changes to a different firewall, have setup port 
mapping through the NAT, have tried different DSL routers and put in a 
high quality microfilter..

So the only things I think it can be are a) my termination provider (but

they service many people and I am sure others would have brought it up 
if it was a problem), b) Asterisk itself or c) my DSL line or ISP..

Unfortunately these are all hard to check and the debug logging on 
Asterisk didn't help much when I tried looking at it..

I know this doesn't help much but if you come up with anything please 
let me know.. Its driving us crazy having calls drop on us especially 
when talking to customers..

Later..
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] D-LINK PoE switch, does it work with cisco or do I need to do the cable trick?

2004-11-29 Thread Garry Taylor
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Daniel Chester
 Sent: Monday, 29 November 2004 2:28 PM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] D-LINK PoE switch, does it work 
 with cisco or do I need to do the cable trick?
 
 
 As an alternative to the expensive PoE switches out there, 
 I found the 
 D-Link Web Smart DES-1316 switch for just around $400.  Now, 
 the issue 
 is, it does 802.3af power and, as I've found out through previous 
 discussions, this original 76?0 series phones (the non G 
 variety) do not 
 use 802.3af.  So I'm assuming I just need to use the special 
 cable thing 
 as per http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Cisco+POE and it will 
 work.  Is it 
 this simple to save myself $1000 over the next lowest price 
 PoE switch? 
It depends on whether the D-LINK injects the power into the unused wires
or whether it injects the power into the TX and RX pairs? Look at the UPDATE
at the bottom of the page you mentioned. 3com inject the power into the TX
and RX pairs, so if the end device is not fully 802.3af compliant in anyway
(like these Cisco phones), then to bad, or buy the 3com covertors first. -
http://www.3com.com/products/en_US/detail.jsp?tab=featurespathtype=purchase
sku=3CNJVOIP-CPOD
___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster isk-users
 To 
 UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] low quality sound samples

2004-11-29 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 12:10 +, Corvin wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm testing Asterisk installation on my Slackware Linux Box,
 I am making calls from kphone. I've noticed that standard sample
 voice files attached to * distro (*.gdm files) havn't good quality.
 What can be done to improve it? I'm using alsa drivers.

Adjust your expectations to telephone quality. Everything is based
around 8khz samples and at best around 14 bit quality. The GSM files
should be around cell phone quality due to the codec. You are welcome to
rerecord any sound prompts you wish and use them at a slightly higher
quality but 8khz 16bit PCM is the highest quality you can use.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] how to call s extension from SIP phone?

2004-11-29 Thread Corvin
BR

C.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Fwd: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Adit 600 channel bank in UK setting]

2004-11-29 Thread Jon Lawrence
On Thursday 18 November 2004 22:16, Tim Robinson wrote:

 Channel banks are a peculiar US thing. Be careful!  You will almost
 certainly be better off using voip handsets (SNOMs are cool, avoid
 Grandstream for anything other than domestic environment) and a few
 Sipura-type ATA's for the analogue fax machines etc. or some Digium
 analogue cards.

So what would you advise using in the UK to interface with standard 2 wire 
phones - I'm trying to avoid having to use ata type adapters.

Jon
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk based bbs

2004-11-29 Thread lenz
In data Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:51:08 +, Jean-Michel Hiver  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto:


It's a very interesting idea. The more I think about it, the more I
wonder . . .
Sounds like something that would end up being used as a dating phone  
service to me :-)

yes, I think so. that could be a viable usage. also for small groups of  
people willing to share a message with each other.
l.


--
Creato con M2, il rivoluzionario client e-mail di Opera:  
http://www.opera.com/m2/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Best SIP phone for high quality telemarketing

2004-11-29 Thread Jon Lawrence
On Friday 19 November 2004 04:42, Luke Connolly wrote:
 I'm really happy with my Polycom IP 600

 http://www.polycom.com

 About $200 cheaper than cisco and no difference in qual or features.


If only :).
In the UK, I found 7960G's for £200 (ish) if I could lose $200 (about £105) 
I'd definitely be tempted with the polycoms.

Jon
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] unable to compile testcpuid.c in spandsp in x86_64

2004-11-29 Thread Nicolás Gudiño
Hello,

 I'm unable to compile testcpuid.c with the __x86_64__ architecture
 (Athlon 64 processor).  The messages are:
 
 /tmp/ccONleRV.s: Assembly messages:
 /tmp/ccONleRV.s: Error: suffix or operands invalid for 'pushf'
  'pop'
  'push'
  'popf'
 
 Is it safe to ignore this module?

I have similar problems compiling under PPC. I just removed that
module together with other troubling assembler parts (MMX detection
routines). After that it compiled fine and worked well (but the
platform is 32 bits, I dunno if it will work under a 64bit platform).
Regards,

-- 
Nicolás Gudiño
Buenos Aires - Argentina
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] low quality sound samples

2004-11-29 Thread Corvin


 Adjust your expectations to telephone quality. Everything is based
 around 8khz samples and at best around 14 bit quality. The GSM files
 should be around cell phone quality due to the codec. You are welcome to
 rerecord any sound prompts you wish and use them at a slightly higher
 quality but 8khz 16bit PCM is the highest quality you can use.

Heh sorry but I can't agree with you I am very familiar with GSM technology
and I use every day cellphone with EFR codec. And voice quality of what I can
hear from kphone is much worse :(.

C.

---
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] UK available SIP phone?

2004-11-29 Thread Jon Lawrence
On Sunday 21 November 2004 12:03, Clive Carter wrote:
  Hi,
   Anybody here from the UK using Asterisk at home?
  I'm looking for a SIP phone which will work with Asterisk and
  not leave me broke!
  
  I got one of the Tecom ones from Solwise but it refuses to
  login to Asterisk server for some reason. May have to send it back.
  
  What are the other options please?
  
  Thanks
  Mike

 I use Grandstream Budge Tones. They are cheap, and some people say they
 look it, but they work !
 I have also got ipDialogs SipTone II. They are twice the price, and
 although I have got the basic functions working, for some reason they
 just will not connect to VoiceMail


I have used both sipura 2k's and ata286 - both worked perfectly with my dect 
phones.
Currently 2K is connected to DECT, ata286 to fax and a 7960G for main use.
I have in the past had budgetones and yes, they do look cheap - but so what if 
it's only for home use.
I work from home, hence the 7960G (I simply needed more lines). But imho 
you'll struggle to beat a sipura 2K with a good quality DECT phone - although 
that works out a similar price as my 7960G.

HTH
Jon
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] low quality sound samples

2004-11-29 Thread Steve Underwood
Corvin wrote:
 

Adjust your expectations to telephone quality. Everything is based
around 8khz samples and at best around 14 bit quality. The GSM files
should be around cell phone quality due to the codec. You are welcome to
rerecord any sound prompts you wish and use them at a slightly higher
quality but 8khz 16bit PCM is the highest quality you can use.
   

Heh sorry but I can't agree with you I am very familiar with GSM technology
and I use every day cellphone with EFR codec. And voice quality of what I can
hear from kphone is much worse :(.
 

Not that it is particularly relevant to your issue, but * doesn't use 
EFR. It uses 06.10, the original GSM codec. EFR is encumbered by Nokia 
and other patents (and isn't that interesting anyway).

Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Audio Drops out at Random - one way

2004-11-29 Thread WipeOut
Craig Waddington wrote:
I found this:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2003-May/000764.html
But it is old, and I am sure lots of changes have been made to the
source, since then.
Where and how do you set absolutetimeout=0, would this help?
A test I want to perform is, we make a call, and say nothing for 20
seconds, and see if that's why the audio stream is being dropped. ???
What I am doing currently is running debug IAX2 when users make a call,
to try pinpoint the issue, but I don't know what I am looking for in the
output.
Are you using Cisco Phones? If so, what firmware, that is the only
common thing at my end.
This install worked fine for months, the audio issue has just started
occurring.
The quality is perfect, except this loss of Audio for a few seconds.
Is your problem purely outgoing?
 

If you haven't set absolutetimeout in your dialplan then there will be 
no reason to have to reset it back to 0..

I tried the debug but didn't see much useful in there.. probably because 
I don't know what its telling me..

I am using Snom phones but I am almost sure its not the phone to 
Asterisk leg because I have an analog phone connected directly to the 
Asterisk box and it also drops calls.. Its almost certainly the IAX leg..

My problem appears to be purely on outgoing but we don't get a huge 
amount of incoming calls over the IAX and as far as I know we have never 
dropped an inbound call, but because of the small inbound call volume I 
wouldn't take it as fact..

Later..
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Record() and problems converting with sox.

2004-11-29 Thread Nick Barnes

Hi,

I'm trying to convert a high(er) quality wav/ulaw/alaw file (captured with
Record()) to a gsm file and can't get the bugger to work. The example on the
page http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+sound+files says that:

$ sox inputfile.wav -r 8000 -c 1 outputfile.gsm resample -ql

Should work, but I get the error message:

sox: Input and Output rates must be different to use resample effect

I get the same error message with

$ sox -t la inputfile.alaw -r 8000 outputfile.gsm resample -ql

And also with WAV, ulaw and everything else. I've trawled through the man
page and am still completely bamboozled - it doesn't explain exactly what is
necessary for it to work properly.

I'm currently running sox version 12.17.6 (the latest) with gsm support
enabled.

Any ideas?

Cheers,

Nick.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] UK available SIP phone?

2004-11-29 Thread Mike Dent
I should reply back now and say that I managed to get the Tecom IP2005
from solwise.co.uk working with Asterisk.

I did however buy a Grandstream Budge Tone when I had almost given up
on the Tecom one, so now I have both! :)

The external quality of rhe grandstream is not as nice as the Tecom
but they it is a bit cheaper.
I'm still in the very early stages of Asterisk so I'm not sure what
features the Tecom one does/not support yet.

Thanks to those who replied.

Regs
Mike (now if only I could get IAX/FWD/SIP or something to work I'd be happy)






On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:48:12 +, Jon Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sunday 21 November 2004 12:03, Clive Carter wrote:
 
 
   Hi,
Anybody here from the UK using Asterisk at home?
   I'm looking for a SIP phone which will work with Asterisk and
   not leave me broke!
   
   I got one of the Tecom ones from Solwise but it refuses to
   login to Asterisk server for some reason. May have to send it back.
   
   What are the other options please?
   
   Thanks
   Mike
 
  I use Grandstream Budge Tones. They are cheap, and some people say they
  look it, but they work !
  I have also got ipDialogs SipTone II. They are twice the price, and
  although I have got the basic functions working, for some reason they
  just will not connect to VoiceMail
 
 
 I have used both sipura 2k's and ata286 - both worked perfectly with my dect
 phones.
 Currently 2K is connected to DECT, ata286 to fax and a 7960G for main use.
 I have in the past had budgetones and yes, they do look cheap - but so what if
 it's only for home use.
 I work from home, hence the 7960G (I simply needed more lines). But imho
 you'll struggle to beat a sipura 2K with a good quality DECT phone - although
 that works out a similar price as my 7960G.
 
 HTH
 Jon
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] New T100P Pri install suggestions?

2004-11-29 Thread Rich Adamson
In the next week or so, we'll be turning up a new T1 Pri from Cox Cable
in Omaha using a T100P (installed but not yet configured). While discussing
the interface parameters with a very knowledgable Cox engineer, we decided
on some of the basics including b8zs, esf, dchan=24, callerid, 5 digits
of called number forwarded to *, and switchtype=national (NI2). They
indicated their CO switch is a DMS500 that is compatible with several
different switchtypes including 5ess, dms100, etc. * will clock sync
from this pri.

This system also has a tdm04b (4-port fxo) installed and working, and is 
expected to remain after the t100p is implemented. Zttool can see both cards
at the moment.

Questions:
1. Is a switchtype=national (NI2) a reasonable choice, or are there other
types that others have found to be more usable/stable with * in the US?

2. Since the current system has a working tdm04b defined as fxsks=1-4 in
/etc/zaptel.conf, how will I know when implementing the t100p whether
those b-channels should be 5-28 or 1-23? (eg, which card has channel 1?
It almost appears that defining the span= first with bchan=1-23 and
follow it with fxsks=25-28 (for the tdm04b), is about the only way to
do that without creating ambiguity for the reader.) Is that a reasonable
approach or assumption?

3. Other then zttool, what other methods have others found useful for
diagnosing layer 1  2 type issues remotely during an initial pri install?
(After ensuring layer 1/2 functionality, I'm assuming 'pri debug', etc,
is most appropriate for diagnosing higher layer and dialplan issues.)

4. In very general terms, when passing incoming pri calls to a specific
extensions.conf context, is using 'exten = s,1...' a reasonable way
to handle inbound calls initially? (Is the 'called number' passed in 
EXTEN like it is with sip calls?)

Any other tips/tricks for handling an initial pri installation?

Rich


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] UK available SIP phone?

2004-11-29 Thread Whisker, Peter
I picked up a Sipura SPA-2000 (new) on e-Bay for ~£70. The voice quality is
excellent.

Peter

-Original Message-
From: Mike Dent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2004 14:12
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] UK available SIP phone?


I should reply back now and say that I managed to get the Tecom IP2005
from solwise.co.uk working with Asterisk.

I did however buy a Grandstream Budge Tone when I had almost given up
on the Tecom one, so now I have both! :)

The external quality of rhe grandstream is not as nice as the Tecom
but they it is a bit cheaper.
I'm still in the very early stages of Asterisk so I'm not sure what
features the Tecom one does/not support yet.

Thanks to those who replied.

Regs
Mike (now if only I could get IAX/FWD/SIP or something to work I'd be happy)






On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:48:12 +, Jon Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 On Sunday 21 November 2004 12:03, Clive Carter wrote:
 
 
   Hi,
Anybody here from the UK using Asterisk at home?
   I'm looking for a SIP phone which will work with Asterisk and
   not leave me broke!
   
   I got one of the Tecom ones from Solwise but it refuses to
   login to Asterisk server for some reason. May have to send it back.
   
   What are the other options please?
   
   Thanks
   Mike
 
  I use Grandstream Budge Tones. They are cheap, and some people say they
  look it, but they work !
  I have also got ipDialogs SipTone II. They are twice the price, and
  although I have got the basic functions working, for some reason they
  just will not connect to VoiceMail
 
 
 I have used both sipura 2k's and ata286 - both worked perfectly with my
dect
 phones.
 Currently 2K is connected to DECT, ata286 to fax and a 7960G for main use.
 I have in the past had budgetones and yes, they do look cheap - but so
what if
 it's only for home use.
 I work from home, hence the 7960G (I simply needed more lines). But imho
 you'll struggle to beat a sipura 2K with a good quality DECT phone -
although
 that works out a similar price as my 7960G.
 
 HTH
 Jon
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended 
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential 
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, 
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended 
recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all 
copies and inform the sender. Thank you.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] unable to compile testcpuid.c in spandsp in x86_64

2004-11-29 Thread Steve Underwood
Nicolás Gudiño wrote:
Hello,
 

I'm unable to compile testcpuid.c with the __x86_64__ architecture
(Athlon 64 processor).  The messages are:
/tmp/ccONleRV.s: Assembly messages:
/tmp/ccONleRV.s: Error: suffix or operands invalid for 'pushf'
 'pop'
 'push'
 'popf'
Is it safe to ignore this module?
   

I have similar problems compiling under PPC. I just removed that
module together with other troubling assembler parts (MMX detection
routines). After that it compiled fine and worked well (but the
platform is 32 bits, I dunno if it will work under a 64bit platform).
Regards,
 

It would be nice if we customised the code for PPC, and maybe ARM. The 
only thing I really do in assembly right now is where is the top bit. 
There is usually an instruction for this on most modern CPUs. It can 
really speed up a couple of things. It think it should really be a 
standard C intrinsic.

Regards,
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk based bbs

2004-11-29 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On November 29, 2004 08:37 am, lenz wrote:
 yes, I think so. that could be a viable usage. also for small groups of
 people willing to share a message with each other.

Meh -- My time is more valuable than that -- why listen to people talk when I 
can read a dozen messages in the same amount of time?  Sure it's a little 
more personal but it's the same reason I prefer to listen to radio than 
watch TV -- there are less senses involved, so I can essentially multitask.  

Now if I were trying to do some kind of dating service, it's better to involve 
more senses but when you're talking about straight information exchange and 
indeed with anything technical, it seems that text and diagrams are best 
unless there is a specific need to communicate something audibly or that 
involves change with time (i.e. motion).

Just my $0.02, having been in this kind of situation many times over the last 
two decades or so.

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple EICON Diva 2.01 PCI ISDN cards with Asterisk - possible?

2004-11-29 Thread Patrick
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 13:51 +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
[snip]
 It appears they have been wrong.
 I just checked on www.capi.org, and Eicon Diva 2.0 PCI cards offers CAPI 
 2.0... This same page says this card is is not Linux compatibile, though, but 
 it is.

Capi.org is not the same as chan_capi or Asterisk. I have never heard of
a cheap (non Server or active) Eicon Diva card working with chan_capi
 Asterisk. If you want an ISDN based chan_capi/Asterisk solution either
buy an Eicon Diva Server, any of the active AVM cards (B1 or C4 iirc) or
the cheapest solution: an AVM Fritz! card.

Regards,
Patrick





___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple EICON Diva 2.01 PCI ISDN cards with Asterisk - possible?

2004-11-29 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Patrick wrote:
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 13:51 +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
[snip]
It appears they have been wrong.
I just checked on www.capi.org, and Eicon Diva 2.0 PCI cards offers CAPI 
2.0... This same page says this card is is not Linux compatibile, though, but 
it is.

Capi.org is not the same as chan_capi or Asterisk. I have never heard of
a cheap (non Server or active) Eicon Diva card working with chan_capi
 Asterisk. If you want an ISDN based chan_capi/Asterisk solution either
buy an Eicon Diva Server, any of the active AVM cards (B1 or C4 iirc) or
the cheapest solution: an AVM Fritz! card.
And I was so happy today because I thought I won't have to buy anything :)
So because I have these cheap Eicon Diva cards - does this mean they 
won't work at all? Or rather that some features will be missing only?

I need only incoming and outgoing calls through these cards.
Tomek
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] multiple EICON Diva 2.01 PCI ISDN cards with Asterisk - possible?

2004-11-29 Thread Patrick
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 15:51 +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
[snip]
 So because I have these cheap Eicon Diva cards - does this mean they 
 won't work at all? Or rather that some features will be missing only?

It just won't work at all (again afaik).

 I need only incoming and outgoing calls through these cards.

That's pretty much everything :)

If you want to explore support for plain Eicon Diva cards in chan_capi
talk to junghanns.net. If you don't want to do that get an AVM Fritz!
card or go the other way and get an HFC-S based ISDN card and use
bristuff (also from junghanns.net). For more info about HFC-S  bristuff
search voip-info.org or google.

Regards,
Patrick

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OS Choice ?

2004-11-29 Thread Michael Graves
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:09:26 +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:

Alex Brecher wrote:
 Which Distro is the most commonly used distro with Asterisk please ?

I don't know which is most commonly used, but I can tell you which is 
the easiest to install if you're going to install the OS from scratch 
anyway and plan to use it with Asterisk:

Xorcom Rapid is a Debian/Asterisk distribution program that includes an 
auto-install and special auto-configuration features. It quickly and 
effortlessly converts any PC to a functioning Asterisk PBX...

Since I had to rebuild my * server over the weekend I had a go with
this Xorcom thingy. It pretty much did as it promised, with minimal
user interaction it created a working * installation with a handy text
mode shell. However, being a Linux newbie I found that it lacked a few
basic things that I needed to make it work for me...most significantly
the ability to use SSH to connect from my desktop transfer config files
and otherwise and administer *. Had I been able to do that I would
probably have tried it out for a while.

Oh, also the version of * it installed was quite old...CVS 5/11/04 if I
recall. That was also a major concern.

If I have to build a new server for my home office some time in the
future I'll try the AstLinux  ISO which is an embedded version of
Gentoo with Asterisk 1.0. Runs on PC Engines WRAP boards.

Michael

--
Michael Graves   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Product Specialist  www.pixelpower.com
Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

o713-861-4005
o800-905-6412
c713-201-1262



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] OS Choice ?

2004-11-29 Thread dean collins
Michael,
Xorcom can allow ssh. You didn't read the instructions properly (lord
knows I didn't the first few dozen times).

When you insert the disk for the first time instead of typing linux or
pressing enter to start the install type expert

This will halt the installation at each section to ask you various
questions (most of which you can ignore) but it will allow you to
install ssh and then you can continue the rest of the installation
remotely.


Cheers,
Dean
(yeh one question I was able to answer).



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
Graves
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 10:17 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] OS Choice ?

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:09:26 +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:

Alex Brecher wrote:
 Which Distro is the most commonly used distro with Asterisk please ?

I don't know which is most commonly used, but I can tell you which is 
the easiest to install if you're going to install the OS from scratch 
anyway and plan to use it with Asterisk:

Xorcom Rapid is a Debian/Asterisk distribution program that includes
an 
auto-install and special auto-configuration features. It quickly and 
effortlessly converts any PC to a functioning Asterisk PBX...

Since I had to rebuild my * server over the weekend I had a go with
this Xorcom thingy. It pretty much did as it promised, with minimal
user interaction it created a working * installation with a handy text
mode shell. However, being a Linux newbie I found that it lacked a few
basic things that I needed to make it work for me...most significantly
the ability to use SSH to connect from my desktop transfer config files
and otherwise and administer *. Had I been able to do that I would
probably have tried it out for a while.

Oh, also the version of * it installed was quite old...CVS 5/11/04 if I
recall. That was also a major concern.

If I have to build a new server for my home office some time in the
future I'll try the AstLinux  ISO which is an embedded version of
Gentoo with Asterisk 1.0. Runs on PC Engines WRAP boards.

Michael

--
Michael Graves   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Product Specialist  www.pixelpower.com
Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

o713-861-4005
o800-905-6412
c713-201-1262



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] app_sms: problems sending a sms

2004-11-29 Thread Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
 Thanks Steffen. Please update me if this ever works.

Seshu

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steffen
Koepf
Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 3:36 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] app_sms: problems sending a sms

Hello Seshu,

no it still does not work. I started to debug this thing, and as far as
i can say, the problem is that app_sms does not recognize the initial
connection established packet, that the SM-SC sends when answering the
call. I don't know now what exactly the problem is at the moment,
possible that it is the level of the signal. I will examine this in the
next days.


cu,

Steffen


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 

 
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does 
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cannot get two TE410Ps to operate correctly in the same machine

2004-11-29 Thread Fernando Macías




Your description makes perfect sense. My system is still getting HDLC
overruns, which are certainly a consequence of frame slips because the
second card is not getting clocked from the external source.

I come back to my basic question: 

How do you configure an asterisk system so that a second TE410P card
recognizes an external clock source? No matter what I've done the
second card is always reported as "internally clocked". Configuring
span 5 (the first on the second board) with exactly the same timing
parameters as for span 1 (which works great) is not doing it. What is
the trick?

Can anybody share the config files for a succesful installation with
more than one TE410P boards? 

Fernando

Rich Adamson wrote:

  
It seems to me that if not all cards are clocked from the same source, 
then each one should be able to get its own external clock. However, 
card 0 has an external clock, but card 1 does not.

  
  
I've read the early posts relating to this and there still seems to be
a misunderstanding on this clock sync issue. This stuff has been around
for a long time in the telephony business, but it seems like not
many people understand it on this list.

Syncing a digium card's clock has nothing to do with universal time, 
expensive add-on clocking hardware, or my clock is more accurate then
your clock. Every single T1/E1 data stream has clocking information
embedded in the data stream. There is no such thing as turning _off_
the clocking. The telco can't do it and you can't do it.

Also, there is absolutely no need for a clock on one digium card to be
in sync with the clock on another digium card (or any other manufacturer
of T1/E1 cards). That discussion is totally irrelevant to using those
ports with one exception, and I'll mention that further in this text.

The clock syncing issue is really very simple. For asterisk cards, do
you connect to some system/device via a T1/E1 that you think interconnects
with _other_ systems/telcos/ITSP's? If so, your digium card should accept
clock syncing from that source (and only that source). You only need to
choose one, but on the four-port digium card you're also given the option
of selecting a secondary (etc) source should the first one fail.

What's the issue?  The telco (or whatever your connecting to) is doing
exactly the same thing; they accept clock sync from another telco or long
distance provider that provides T1/E1 connections to them. Assume purely
for discussion purposes, the telco's clock is supposed to run at exactly
1.544 mhz/sec. What happens if their clock is actually running at
1,543,900 hz instead (clocks do drift)? You could have the most accurate
clock in the world that you're syncing to, and in this case you are going
to have a problem because the two clocks are _different_. There is going 
to be frame slips that occur, and the rate of slips is directly related 
to how far apart the two clocks really are. How do you get around that? 
By simply telling your T1/E1 card that you are syncing to that span. 
No more slips, period.

The digium T1/E1 cards only have a single clock chip on the card. There 
is no reason to have four clocks on a four port card. By telling your
card to accept clock sync on port 1 (as an example), the digium card has
the smarts to adjust that single clock chip to be in sync with that span.
Since practically every telephone company has T1/E1 feeds from other
telco's, they follow a hierarchical engineering approach that basically
says all telco's are in sync. That engineering approach has been around
since T1's were invented, and the telco engineers know that very well.

So, what happens if port #2 goes to yet another telco? No problem, because
the telco's are already in sync. Choose one as your primary sync and
the other for backup (secondary).

What happens if port #3 goes to one of your channel banks? No problem, 
your digium card has embedded the clocking information in the T1/E1 data
stream (you don't have a choice either), and you configure your channel
bank to _accept_ clock sync from that T1/E1.

The only exception (as mentioned above) to this is "if" you happen to 
engineer a combination of three or more asterisk systems in a circular
fashion, and you've told all three to sync from its neighbor. In other
words, system A connects to system B, then C, which connects back to 
system A, and you have B accepting clock sync from A, C from B, and 
then on the last leg from C back to A you tell A to use clocking 
from C. Any clock drifting that might occur will be passed around the 
closed loop and _could_ present a problem if the clock drifted far 
enough off frequency. E.g., one bad card could impact all three spans 
under the right conditions.

What happens if you have a second T1/E1 card in the system? It doesn't
make any difference. If a port on that card _is_ connected to a telco,
then accept clock sync from it. If none of the ports have such a 
connection, then simply configure the devices at the far 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] how to call s extension from SIP phone?

2004-11-29 Thread Gilad Ben-Yossef

*Which* SIP phone?
Some of them, like the Gradstream Budgettone, have a dial this number 
when user picks up configuration option. If you have such a phone you 
can create an alias for the s extention like so:

exten = 666,1,Goto(s,1)
And instruct the phone to dial '666' when the phone is off the hook.
Hope this helps,
Gilad
--
Gilad Ben-Yossef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Codefidence. A name you can trust(tm)
Web: http://codefidence.com  | SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +972.9.8650475 ext. 201 | Fax:  +972.9.8850643
I am Jack's Overwritten Stack Pointer
-- Hackers Club, the movie
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: how to call s extension from SIP phone?

2004-11-29 Thread Jason Kawakami
- Original Message - 
snip

build another extension that uses the goto() application.
exten=xxx,goto(context,s,1)
will send the call to that context.
think about restating your question in the body of your email when you post.
Jason Kawakami
www.optellabs.com
Salt Lake City, UT 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] overriding DTMF and codec from dialplan?

2004-11-29 Thread Brian West
OH But it is just that simple. 

You also have:
  -= Info about application 'ImportVar' =-

[Synopsis]:
Set variable to value

[Description]:
  ImportVar(#n=channel|variable): Sets variable n to variable as evaluated
on
the specified channel (instead of current).  If prefixed with _, single
inheritance assumed.  If prefixed with __, infinite inheritance is assumed.

bkw

 
 It's not so simple. Check
 http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=928
 
 for the details.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Registering on Gatekeeper

2004-11-29 Thread Nahuel Alejandro Ramos
Thanks in advance kido. Please someone could help me. I am so closed
to the solution :)

My provider sent me this log from his gnuGK:

RCF|200.68.216.107:1720|root:h323_ID|terminal|7000_endp;
URQ|200.68.216.107:32877|7000_endp|maintenance;
SoftPBX: Endpoint 200.68.216.107:1720 unregistered!

My Asterisk keep sending root as h323_id. My h323.conf is this:

; h323.conf
[general]
listenAddress=0.0.0.0
listenPort=1720
tcpStart=1
tcpEnd=2
udpStart=1
udpEnd=2
fastStart=yes
h245tunnelling=yes
h245inSetup=yes
gatekeeper=###.###.###.###
gatekeeperTTL=600
AllowGKRouted = yes
userInputMode=Q931
amaFlags=default
accountCode=4571025814
disallow=all
allow=all
wrapLibTraceLevel=1
libTraceLevel=9
libTraceFile=/root/pruebalogasterisk

[##] ; Mi h323_id
type=h323
prefix=99,0343
context=casanahuel

I have already done a log watch, a h.323 debug and a h.323 trace 10,
and Asterisk send root as h323_id.

The h.323 trace 1 give me millons of this lines:

  0:23.901   Transactor:81395c8h323trans.cxx(709)   Trans 
 registrationRequest rejected: fullRegistrationRequired
  0:24.922   Transactor:81395c8h323trans.cxx(709)   Trans 
 registrationRequest rejected: fullRegistrationRequired
  0:25.359   Transactor:81395c8h323trans.cxx(709)   Trans 
 registrationRequest rejected: fullRegistrationRequired
  0:26.003   Transactor:81395c8h323trans.cxx(709)   Trans 
 registrationRequest rejected: fullRegistrationRequired






On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 20:41:17 -0300, Nahuel Alejandro Ramos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have already tryed this but asterisk always send root as h323_id
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 21:31:52 -, kido noagbodji [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  If you are using GnuGK, i think this should do,
  in your h323.conf file, configure an asterisk endpoint as follow for
  instance
 
  [time]    Username
  type=h323
  e164=99
  context=test
 
  K.
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Nahuel Alejandro Ramos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 5:52 PM
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Registering on Gatekeeper
 
   Hi,
   Anyone know how can I send a username or account id (h.323) and a
   password to register on a remote Gatekeeper. I am using the Nuphone
   channel with the h323.conf. I tryed everything but Asterisk always
   send root as account id and the Gatekeeper rejected me.
   Thank you very much...
  
   Nahuel Ramos.
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] IAX2 Warnings - chan_iax2.c:1464 attempt_transmit

2004-11-29 Thread Craig Waddington








I am getting quite a few of these warnings lately, and audio
is sometimes dropping to one way.



Is this some way related? Latency to my IAX provider is
minimal, and no major packet loss.



Nov 29 15:04:00 WARNING[1095035200]: chan_iax2.c:1464
attempt_transmit: Max retries exceeded to host X.X.X.X on IAX2/marg/2 (type =
6, subclass = 2, ts=120009, seqno=36)

Nov 29 15:04:00 WARNING[1095035200]: chan_iax2.c:1464
attempt_transmit: Max retries exceeded to host X.X.X.X on IAX2/marg/2 (type =
6, subclass = 11, ts=120012, seqno=37)

Nov 29 15:10:42 WARNING[1089370688]: chan_sip.c:675
retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for seqno 102 (Critical Request)

Nov 29 15:10:46 WARNING[1089370688]: chan_sip.c:675 retrans_pkt:
Maximum retries exceeded on call [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
seqno 102 (Non-critical Request)



Can anyone bring some light to this?



Using cisco phones.






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Subject: IAXy and ADPCM codec problem.

2004-11-29 Thread Carlos Clemares
Hi everyone,

I'm using the IAXy boxes and i'm having some trouble when I use it with
the ADPCM codec.

When I use the ADPCM codec only one person (out of the two of the
conversation) is able to hear the other, but when I switch to ULAW codec
everybody can hear the other.

The ULAW codec is too heavy for my bandwidth (64Kbits/s) and its sounds
choppy, the ADPCM codec sounds good but only in one way, can anyboddy
help me with this isue??? I don't thing the ADPCM codec works like this
normally.

Thanks for all
-- 
Carlos Clemares
Director
58 (0) 212 740-53-12/17
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.radiumtec.com

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] SIP phones cutting out with Asterisk??

2004-11-29 Thread Doug Reid - Stormcorp



Hi 


The 
problem is not normally the phones, check that you don't have busy detect on 
this sometimes can cause the phone to cut out.
What 
card are you using? I have had the same problem with Digium FXO cards, we 
changed to Voictronix and the problem went
away. 
If you are using an ISDN card it is most probably the busy 
detect.

Doug

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Tim 
  JacksonSent: Friday, November 26, 2004 9:44 PMTo: 
  Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: RE: 
  [Asterisk-Users] SIP phones cutting out with Asterisk??
  
  Ive had the same 
  problem. I posted to the list earlier about the problem, and from what I can 
  tell, its a Polycom issue (not a network issue as stated in the other post). 
  It happens after the phones have been on for about 2-3 days from what I can 
  tell. My solution to this was to use a script to reboot the phones every night 
  at like 3am, and the problem has almost disappeared. If you find any other 
  solutions, please post them to the list.
  
  -Tim
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave HendersonSent: Friday, November 26, 2004 12:11 
  PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Asterisk-Users] SIP phones 
  cutting out with Asterisk??Importance: 
  High
  
  
  Hi 
  folks,
  
  
  
  I've got a very bizarre problem 
  recurring when making calls with Polycom SoundPoint IP500 SIP phones and 
  Asterisk. Sometimes when a call comes in to an IP500, one of the sides 
  of the conversation is cut off (i.e. the caller can't hear the callee, or 
  vice-versa). This isn't easily repeated, and rebooting the phone, or 
  restarting Asterisk, doesn't seem to have an 
  effect.
  
  
  
  Has anybody else experienced 
  this sort of thing happening?
  
  
  
  I've seen this with both 
  CVS-v1-0-10/27/04-21:54:17 and 
  CVS-HEAD-09/02/04-22:57:21.
  
  
  
  Thanks for any 
  insight,
  Dave 
  HendersonCustomer Service 
  ManagerThe IT Department, 
  Inc.ph: 
  613-523-2322x321fx: 613-526-3949 
  
  
  
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] IAXy and ADPCM codec problem

2004-11-29 Thread Carlos Clemares
Hi everyone,

I'm using the IAXy boxes and i'm having some trouble when I use it with
the ADPCM codec.

When I use the ADPCM codec only one person (out of the two of the
conversation) is able to hear the other, but when I switch to ULAW codec
everybody can hear the other.

The ULAW codec is too heavy for my bandwidth (64Kbits/s) and its sounds
choppy, the ADPCM codec sounds good but only in one way, can anyboddy
help me with this isue??? I don't thing the ADPCM codec works like this
normally.

Thanks for all
-- 
Carlos Clemares

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cannot get two TE410Ps to operate correctly in the same machine

2004-11-29 Thread Rich Adamson

 Your description makes perfect sense. My system is still getting HDLC 
 overruns, which are 
certainly a consequence of frame
 slips because the second card is not getting clocked from the external source.
 
 I come back to my basic question:
 
 How do you configure an asterisk system so that a second TE410P card 
 recognizes an external 
clock source? No matter
 what I've done the second card is always reported as internally clocked. 
 Configuring span 5 
(the first on the second board)
 with exactly the same timing parameters as for span 1 (which works great) is 
 not doing it. 
What is the trick?
 
 Can anybody share the config files for a succesful installation with more 
 than one TE410P 
boards?
 

I don't recall from your previous postings on this topic, so I'll ask.

After config'ing span 5 in /etc/zaptel.conf, are you reloading/restarting 
the drivers? (That _is_ necessary.)

Rich




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Fax pass-throught.

2004-11-29 Thread Alessandro Ren





 I've already search in the mailing list and voip-wiki site but I
can not find any examples in how to send a FAX through a IAX channel.
 I've found the fax extention setting, but this is not what I want
to do. I'd like to dial from the line on the other side of the IAX
channel to a fax, to cut long distance costs, and send a FAX from the
source IAX channel. Like bellow:

 source
   destination
 FAX --- Asterisk --- internet --- Asterisk ---
external line - PSTN -- FAX

 I've also tried setting the codec to G.711 but it has not worked
either.
 Can anyone shed a light on this matter?
 I am using Asterisk 1.0.2.

 Thanks.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fax pass-throught.

2004-11-29 Thread Steve Prior
Alessandro Ren wrote:


I've found the fax extention setting, but this is not what I want to 
do. I'd like to dial from the line on the other side of the IAX channel 
to a fax, to cut long distance costs, and send a FAX from the source IAX 
channel. Like bellow:

source 
 destination
 FAX --- Asterisk  --- internet --- Asterisk --- 
external line - PSTN --  FAX

I haven't done this, but I've heard that faxing through a voip connection
is problematic.  Have you considered the possibility (if you control both
Asterisk installations in your diagram) that you could fax to a virtual
fax on the source Asterisk system which would capture to a file, email or
file transfer the image to the other Asterisk box which would then dial out
and send to the final destination?  This assumes your source and destination
actually have to be real fax machines, otherwise you have even more options.
Check out:
http://scottstuff.net/scott/archives/000152.html
and see if it gives you any ideas.
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Spawn extension

2004-11-29 Thread Nardis Dome
hi,

calling from Asterisk to PBX via Eicon Diva 4BRI gives
me the following error.

-- Executing NoOp(SIP/2004-41dc,  call for 
998004) in new stack

-- Executing Dial(SIP/2004-41dc,
CAPI/99:8004|20|r) in new stack
  == Everyone is busy/congested at this time

-- Executing Congestion(SIP/2004-41dc, ) in new
stack
  == Spawn extension (default, 998004, 3) exited
non-zero on 'SIP/2004-41dc'

What is the meaning of the exited non-zero line?

thx for your feedback








__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! 
http://my.yahoo.com 
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: how to call s extension from SIP phone?

2004-11-29 Thread Jason Kawakami
- Original Message - 
snip

build another extension that uses the goto() application.
exten=xxx,goto(context,s,1)
will send the call to that context.
think about restating your question in the body of your email when you post.
Jason Kawakami
www.optellabs.com
Salt Lake City, UT
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] OS Choice ?

2004-11-29 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
Michael Graves wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:09:26 +0200, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:

Alex Brecher wrote:
Which Distro is the most commonly used distro with Asterisk please ?
I don't know which is most commonly used, but I can tell you which is 
the easiest to install if you're going to install the OS from scratch 
anyway and plan to use it with Asterisk:

Xorcom Rapid is a Debian/Asterisk distribution program that includes an 
auto-install and special auto-configuration features. It quickly and 
effortlessly converts any PC to a functioning Asterisk PBX...

Since I had to rebuild my * server over the weekend I had a go with
this Xorcom thingy. It pretty much did as it promised, with minimal
user interaction it created a working * installation with a handy text
mode shell. However, being a Linux newbie I found that it lacked a few
basic things that I needed to make it work for me...most significantly
the ability to use SSH to connect from my desktop transfer config files
and otherwise and administer *. Had I been able to do that I would
probably have tried it out for a while.
Oh, also the version of * it installed was quite old...CVS 5/11/04 if I
recall. That was also a major concern.
If I have to build a new server for my home office some time in the
future I'll try the AstLinux  ISO which is an embedded version of
Gentoo with Asterisk 1.0. Runs on PC Engines WRAP boards.
Michael
Micheal,
	Actually, AstLinux is not available as an ISO just yet.  I am waiting 
until I hear more feedback from current users of AstLinux before I 
create an ISO.  When I do create the ISO I will let you know.

--
Kristian Kielhofner
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] fxo connection in the UK

2004-11-29 Thread Peter Hoppe
I located in the UK and am looking into connecting three analog BT lines to an astersik system which 
is replacing our current pbx. I could use three Digium wildcard x100p cards for that but I rather 
use a unit which is external to the computer to have a better separation of analogue/digital side. I 
would not like to go ISDN because the analog lines have so far sufficed in every repect and I tend 
not to fix what isn't broken.

Today I found a unit on a supplier's website
http://www.peripheralcorner.co.uk/product_info.php/cPath/113/products_id/544
which is  a
Micronet SP5054 VoIP Gateway 4 FXO Ports
The website for this product is
http://www.micronet.info/Products/voip/SP5054.asp
and it appears to me that this unit would (similar to a channel bank) multiplex our three BT lines 
into one LAN port. If so, I could simply connect such a box to a LAN port in my asterisk server. I 
suspect the unit would appear to the asterisk box like three SIP-to-fxo converters (sorry for the 
horrible beginner-jargon). I basically would like to know whether I could use this unit instead of 
three x100P cards and it would functionally replace them.

Questions
* Would it be legal in the UK to connect such a unit to the PSTN ?
  In the specifications
http://www.micronet.info/Products/voip/SP5054.asp#Specif
  there seems to be CE regulatory approval (see bottom row of table, Emission),
  but I don't know whether that is sufficient for use with a PSTN in the UK.
* Could I operate the unit in a transparent fashion, i.e. it would look to 
the asterisk
  machine as if I had connected three SIP-to-fxo converters which I can control
  independently of each other from the asterisk machine?
  For example, could I initiate / receive a phone call while another phone 
conversation
  is running? For outgoing calls, could I specify which fxo port to use / for 
incoming
  calls, could I find out which port answered it?
* Would the fxo ports match the UK PSTN specifications (impedance)?
I am asking in this list just in case that someone has used / is using such voip gateways. I am 
still very much in the enquiry phase. Thank you very much for your consideration.

Peter
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Spawn extension

2004-11-29 Thread Colin Anderson
 == Spawn extension (default, 998004, 3) exited
non-zero on 'SIP/2004-41dc'

What is the meaning of the exited non-zero line?

afaik, after something executes, zero is returned: Everything went OK or
-1 Something bad happened, you can branch conditionally in the dialplan
based on that. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any kind of
granularity there so you can't branch based on what went wrong, just that
something went wrong. hth.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on a notebook: Modem = FXO?

2004-11-29 Thread Philipp Ebneter
Hi,
I've got a (maybe stupid) question:
I'd like to install Asterisk on my notebook (just to play around with 
it). Is my internal phone modem equivalent to an FXO port? Hence, could 
I make phonecalls to my pots-line with it?

thanks
philipp
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on a notebook: Modem = FXO?

2004-11-29 Thread Sean Kennedy
Philipp Ebneter wrote:
Hi,
I've got a (maybe stupid) question:
I'd like to install Asterisk on my notebook (just to play around with 
it). Is my internal phone modem equivalent to an FXO port? Hence, 
could I make phonecalls to my pots-line with it?

thanks
philipp

If the modem has an Intel 537 chipset ( or 517? ), I don't see why not. 

But that's just a guess.  :)
Sean
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk on a notebook: Modem = FXO?

2004-11-29 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 17:46 +0100, Philipp Ebneter wrote:
 Hi,
 I've got a (maybe stupid) question:
 I'd like to install Asterisk on my notebook (just to play around with 
 it). Is my internal phone modem equivalent to an FXO port? Hence, could 
 I make phonecalls to my pots-line with it?

While yes your modem is an FXO port, it is highly unlikely you will get
a driver for that modem working with asterisk. Your best option for a
laptop would be to consider a VoIP appliance that would provide FXO or
FXS ports for the laptop. 
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cannot get two TE410Ps to operate correctly in the same machine

2004-11-29 Thread Fernando Macías




Yes. I've tried:

- ztcfg
- rmmod the wct4xxp module and zaptel and modprob'ing again
- rebooting the server.

No matter what I do, the second card is always "internally clocked".
The E1 I have plugged into that board is good. It can clock the first
card just fine.

This is my complete zaptel.conf, just for reference:

# E1 ISDN PRI.

span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3
bchan=1-15
dchan=16
bchan=17-31

# E1 R2 

span=2,2,0,cas,hdb3
cas=32-46:1101
cas=48-62:1101

# E1 ISDN PRI

span=3,0,0,ccs,hdb3
bchan=63-77
dchan=78
bchan=79-93

# T1 Channel bank.

span=4,0,0,esf,b8zs
fxsks=94-101
fxoks=102-117

# E1 ISDN PRI. Same carrier as span 1. Line can be exchanged with span
1 and all is OK.

span=5,1,0,ccs,hdb3
bchan=118-132
dchan=133
bchan=134-148

# E1 Unused.

span=6,0,0,ccs,hdb3
unused=149-163
unused=164
unused=165-179

# E1 Unused

span=7,0,0,ccs,hdb3
unused=180-194
unused=195
unused=196-210

# T1 Channel bank.

span=8,0,0,esf,b8zs
fxoks=211-234

Fernando

Rich Adamson wrote:

  
Your description makes perfect sense. My system is still getting HDLC overruns, which are 

  
  certainly a consequence of frame
  
  
slips because the second card is not getting clocked from the external source.

I come back to my basic question:

How do you configure an asterisk system so that a second TE410P card recognizes an external 

  
  clock source? No matter
  
  
what I've done the second card is always reported as "internally clocked". Configuring span 5 

  
  (the first on the second board)
  
  
with exactly the same timing parameters as for span 1 (which works great) is not doing it. 

  
  What is the trick?
  
  
Can anybody share the config files for a succesful installation with more than one TE410P 

  
  boards?
  
  
I don't recall from your previous postings on this topic, so I'll ask.

After config'ing span 5 in /etc/zaptel.conf, are you reloading/restarting 
the drivers? (That _is_ necessary.)

Rich




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Sending triggers through SIP

2004-11-29 Thread Håkan Persson
Hi!
I have a Asterisk implementation where I would like to start an update 
of the PBX (config files, etc) by sending some kind of trigger from a 
remote machine through SIP and catching that in a (AGI) script in the 
Asterisk PBX. What is the simplest way to archive this? I don't want to 
set up other services than SIP on the machine.

I am not a SIP expert and I am planning to use one of the available SIP 
libraries.

Thanks,
Håkan

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Regular Phones - ISDN NT - FXS Adapters

2004-11-29 Thread Dhennys Pestana
Hello!
I'd like to connect regular analog phones (Cordless Panasonic, for instance) to 
Asterisk.
What's the cheapest FXS device on the market that can be used with Asterisk? 
Where can I find it?
It has to be the cheapest to avoid huge import taxes, since I'm planning to buy 
in bulk.
I'm also looking for BRI ISDN cards (cheap and used, preferable) that can be 
used in NT mode so I can connect my ISDN phones to
Asterisk but it seems hard to find on E-bay or any web site
Can anybody point me to some direction? Any tips on brand and model?
In case there's any retail/vendor reading this, please contactme in private.
Thanks!
-Dhennys


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] NOTICE[507921]: app_dial.c:742 dial_exec: Unable to create channel of type 'Zap'

2004-11-29 Thread U. Abdullah Sheikh
Hi Asterisk-ians!
Need all of your help. I am stuck with this issue for last few days. I have 
one X100P installed in my system. My Asterisk is registered with another 
Asterisk Server/SIP provider as client and the call is successfully received 
by my Asterisk server (named as starwars).

Now, the extentions.conf file states, the incoming INTO * should go out to 
fxo as below:

exten = s,1,Dial(Zap/1/403142142)
exten = s,2,Dial(Zap/1/403132663)
exten = s,3,hangup
whereas other file config is as below:
zapata.conf
[channels]
relaxdtmf=yes
callwaiting=yes
callwaitingcallerid=yes
threewaycalling=yes
transfer=yes
cancallforward=yes
usecallerid=yes
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
rxgain=0.0
txgain=0.0
immediate=yes
context=bell
signalling=fxs_ks
callerid=asreceived
channel = 1
zaptel
fxsks=1
loadzone=us
defaultzone=us
sip.conf
register = 7062210:9211:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[MyService]
type=peer
username=7062210
fromuser=7062210
secret=9211
host=192.168.7.16
context=incoming
fromdomain=sipdom.inf
nat=no
canreinvite=no
dtmfmode=inband
so whenever the call comes in from service provider's asterisk to my 
starwars asterisk, I get the error messages captured below:

starwars*CLI sip show registry
HostUsername   Refresh State
192.168.7.16:5060   7062210105 Registered
   -- Executing Dial(SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790, Zap/1/67742142) in new 
stack
Nov 30 01:41:52 NOTICE[507921]: app_dial.c:742 dial_exec: Unable to create 
channel of type 'Zap'
 == Everyone is busy/congested at this time
   -- Executing Dial(SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790, Zap/1/61002663) in new 
stack
Nov 30 01:41:52 NOTICE[507921]: app_dial.c:742 dial_exec: Unable to create 
channel of type 'Zap'
 == Everyone is busy/congested at this time
   -- Executing Hangup(SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790, ) in new stack
 == Spawn extension (incoming, s, 3) exited non-zero on 
'SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790'
   -- Executing Dial(SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790, Zap/1/67742142) in new 
stack
Nov 30 01:41:52 NOTICE[524305]: app_dial.c:742 dial_exec: Unable to create 
channel of type 'Zap'
 == Everyone is busy/congested at this time
   -- Executing Dial(SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790, Zap/1/61002663) in new 
stack
Nov 30 01:41:52 NOTICE[524305]: app_dial.c:742 dial_exec: Unable to create 
channel of type 'Zap'
 == Everyone is busy/congested at this time
   -- Executing Hangup(SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790, ) in new stack
 == Spawn extension (incoming, s, 3) exited non-zero on 
'SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790'

please note the output of the following commands:
starwars*CLI zap show channels
  Chan Extension  Context Language   MusicOnHold
pseudodefaultdefault
starwars*CLI zap show channel 1
Unable to find given channel 1
starwars*CLI sip show registry
HostUsername   Refresh State
192.168.7.16:5060   7062210105 Registered
starwars*CLI sip show peers
Name/usernameHostDyn Nat ACL Mask Port 
Status
MyService/7062210  192.168.7.16255.255.255.255  5060 
Unmonitored

Thanks  Thanks
Abdullah.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Zap gives no ring to the caller...

2004-11-29 Thread adria vidal
I have a E1 conected to asterisk all zap channels are ok, but when calls come into Asterisk caller don't hear none ring, the call goes straight into the menu, how can i simulate 2 or 3 rings?

here it is my conf.

exten => s,1,Answer
exten => s,2,Wait,2
exten => s,3,NoOp(${CALLERID})

exten => s,4,ResponseTimeout,45
exten => s,5,DigitTimeout,3
exten => s,6,Background(wellcome)


Adrià Vidal 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zap gives no ring to the caller...

2004-11-29 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On November 29, 2004 12:35 pm, adria vidal wrote:
 I have a E1 conected to asterisk all zap channels are ok, but when
 calls come into Asterisk caller don't hear none ring, the call goes
 straight into the menu, how can i simulate 2 or 3 rings?

 exten = s,1,Answer
 exten = s,2,Wait,2
 exten = s,3,NoOp(${CALLERID})

Wait() before Answer() if you want to have the caller hear a few rings.  Why I 
don't know, but hey, it's your setup.  :-)

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zap gives no ring to the caller...

2004-11-29 Thread Rich Adamson
Have you tried exten = s,2,Ringing

phoenix*CLI show application ringing
phoenix*CLI 
  -= Info about application 'Ringing' =- 

[Synopsis]:
Indicate ringing tone

[Description]:
  Ringing(): Request that the channel indicate ringing tone to the user.
Always returns 0.



  From: adria vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Zap gives no ring to the caller...
  Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:35:36 +0100 
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 I have a E1 conected to asterisk all zap channels are ok, but when 
 calls come into Asterisk caller don't hear none ring, the call goes 
 straight into the menu, how can i simulate 2 or 3 rings?
 
 here it is my conf.
 
 exten = s,1,Answer
 exten = s,2,Wait,2
 exten = s,3,NoOp(${CALLERID})
 
 exten = s,4,ResponseTimeout,45
 exten = s,5,DigitTimeout,3
 exten = s,6,Background(wellcome)
 
 
 Adrià Vidal
 

---End of Original Message-


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cannot get two TE410Ps to operate correctly in the same machine

2004-11-29 Thread Rich Adamson
Guess at this point I'd call digium support and open a ticket.


 Yes. I've tried:
 
 - ztcfg
 - rmmod the wct4xxp module and zaptel and modprob'ing again
 - rebooting the server.
 
 No matter what I do, the second card is always internally clocked. The E1 I 
 have plugged 
into that board is good. It can
 clock the first card just fine.
 
 This is my complete zaptel.conf, just for reference:
 
 # E1 ISDN PRI.
 
 span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3
 bchan=1-15
 dchan=16
 bchan=17-31
 
 # E1 R2
 
 span=2,2,0,cas,hdb3
 cas=32-46:1101
 cas=48-62:1101
 
 # E1 ISDN PRI
 
 span=3,0,0,ccs,hdb3
 bchan=63-77
 dchan=78
 bchan=79-93
 
 # T1 Channel bank.
 
 span=4,0,0,esf,b8zs
 fxsks=94-101
 fxoks=102-117
 
 # E1 ISDN PRI. Same carrier as span 1. Line can be exchanged with span 1 and 
 all is OK.
 
 span=5,1,0,ccs,hdb3
 bchan=118-132
 dchan=133
 bchan=134-148
 
 # E1 Unused.
 
 span=6,0,0,ccs,hdb3
 unused=149-163
 unused=164
 unused=165-179
 
 # E1 Unused
 
 span=7,0,0,ccs,hdb3
 unused=180-194
 unused=195
 unused=196-210
 
 # T1 Channel bank.
 
 span=8,0,0,esf,b8zs
 fxoks=211-234
 
 Fernando
 
 Rich Adamson wrote:
 
 Your description makes perfect sense. My system is still getting HDLC 
 overruns, which are 
 
 
 certainly a consequence of frame
   
 
 slips because the second card is not getting clocked from the 
 external source.
 
 I come back to my basic question:
 
 How do you configure an asterisk system so that a second TE410P card 
 recognizes an external 
 
 
 clock source? No matter
   
 
 what I've done the second card is always reported as internally 
 clocked. Configuring span 5 
 
 
 (the first on the second board)
   
 
 with exactly the same timing parameters as for span 1 (which works 
 great) is not doing it. 
 
 
 What is the trick?
   
 
 Can anybody share the config files for a succesful installation with 
 more than one TE410P 
 
 
 boards?
   
 
 I don't recall from your previous postings on this topic, so I'll ask.
 
 After config'ing span 5 in /etc/zaptel.conf, are you reloading/restarting 
 the drivers? (That _is_ necessary.)
 
 Rich
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   
---End of Original Message-


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IP to IP call without server?

2004-11-29 Thread Michael Graves
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:38:00 +0900, nkb wrote:

 I'm not a big fan of supporting proprietary soltuions so I'd avoid
 Skype. However, what about Free World Dialup? Uses common sip clients,
 they have the new Pulver communicator which supports video, voice, and
 text chat. Seems like a good solution.
 
What's the diff. between FWD and Skype other than Skype uses proprietary 
solution? I'm getting a little confused with these softphones and 
provider companies. I cant tell what's so great of one from the other. 
Is there something special about FWD I'm missing that make it better 
than other solution like Skype? Thanks!

From my standpoint as the user of * for my home office I prefer FWD.
They have an experimental program that lets me use IAX2 to connect my
server to theirs. While it's not a production program yet (Ed Guy
assures us that will happen soon) it has been useful. The fact that
they support the * community makes me inclibed to use/support their
effort over Skype.

FWIW, Skype isn't anything spectacularily innovative anyway. There's
been much coverage of this fact in the bloggosphere. It works, connects
Skype users, PSTN if you pay. How is that any different of better than
anything else? They handle NAT well, but so do IAX2 clients. They
generate a lot of hype, which many SIP providers don't.

Michael
--
Michael Graves   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Product Specialist  www.pixelpower.com
Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

o713-861-4005
o800-905-6412
c713-201-1262



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Parking from call group problems

2004-11-29 Thread Ronald Hartmann










Trouble in Parking Paradise!



Good Day all,



I have a situation that I have tracked as far as I can take it and am
looking for assistance into the matter.



My setup. Asterisk 1.0.1 with the AMP config
environment.





When I have auto attendant answer the phone and I dial my extension 2204

The call come through and If I park it it
gets place into extension 701 (the first parking spot).

I am able to successfully pick the call up and all works fine.



Then I repeat step one, however If I leave the call parked, and upon
the timeout the call rings back to my phone.



Excellent this is what I expected.



NOW The problem



A call comes in and goes to a call group (700) in this case. This call group then rings 3 extensions
(2203, 2204, 2201)

I can pick up the call and place it into parking . I am then able to grab the call out of
parking slot with no problems.



BUT.



If I let the call in the parking slot, upon it timing out, the person
who was parked gets a loud screeching noise and the call is eventually dropped.



I have it narrowed down to the following.



When the call is parked from the auto attendant the ring back is set to




snip from pastebin.ca/2452  *** Works Correctly and
send call back to the extension that parked the call **



069 == Parked Zap/3-1 on 701. Will timeout
back to aa_1,2204,1 in 45 seconds
070 -- Playing
'digits/7' (language 'en')
071 -- Playing
'digits/0' (language 'en')
072 -- Playing
'digits/1' (language 'en')
073 -- Stopped music
on hold on Zap/3-1
074 -- Started music
on hold, class 'default', on Zap/3-1
075 -- Added extension
'701' priority 1 to parkedcalls
076 == Spawn extension
(macro-dial, s, 1) exited KEEPALIVE in macro 'dial' on 'Zap/3-1'
077 == Spawn extension (macro-exten-vm,
s, 4) exited KEEPALIVE in macro 'exten-vm' on 'Zap/3-1'
078 == Spawn extension (aa_1,
2204, 1) exited KEEPALIVE on 'Zap/3-1'
079 == Timeout for Zap/3-1 parked
on 701. Returning to aa_1,2204,1



snip from pastebin.ca/2453  *** DOES NOT Work
Correctly **



078 == Parked Zap/3-1 on 701. Will timeout
back to ext-group,700,3 in 45 seconds
079 -- Playing
'digits/7' (language 'en')
080 -- Playing
'digits/0' (language 'en')
081 -- Playing
'digits/1' (language 'en')
082 -- Stopped music
on hold on Zap/3-1
083 -- Started music
on hold, class 'default', on Zap/3-1
084 -- Added extension
'701' priority 1 to parkedcalls
085 == Spawn extension
(macro-dial, s, 1) exited KEEPALIVE in macro 'dial' on 'Zap/3-1'
086 == Spawn extension
(macro-rg-group, s, 4) exited KEEPALIVE in macro 'rg-group' on 'Zap/3-1'
087 == Spawn extension (ext-group,
700, 3) exited KEEPALIVE on 'Zap/3-1'
088 == Timeout for Zap/3-1 parked
on 701. Returning to ext-group,700,3



This is as far as my skill level allows me to go with this
problem. 



Anyone willing to assist in determining how to make the call group
actually set the ringback extension to the actual
extension that did the parking would be most appreciated.



Thanks for your time list.



Files which may be helpful.



http://pastebin.ca/2452 Manager debug
messages of working parking situation

http://pastebin.ca/2453 Manager Debug messages of NON_Functional Parking

http://pastebin.ca/2454 Extensions.conf

http://pastebin.ca/2455 Extensions_additional.conf






~ron








___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] NOTICE[507921]: app_dial.c:742 dial_exec: Unable to create channel of type 'Zap'

2004-11-29 Thread Rich Adamson
Looks like asterisk is trying to send the call out Zap/1, but is having
an issue that appears almost like there is no telephone line attached to
your x100p card. Is this machine located in the US and are you sure
the pstn line is properly plugged to the card?
Another remote possibility is that asterisk is detecting a busy signal
on the pstn line. If you are in the US, what is 403142142? That isn't
a standard US telephone number. (Nine digits?) Again, if this is in the
US, best guess is that sending those digits out the pstn line is 
resulting in some sort of busy/congestion tone coming back from your
telco.


 Hi Asterisk-ians!
 
 Need all of your help. I am stuck with this issue for last few days. I have 
 one X100P installed in my system. My Asterisk is registered with another 
 Asterisk Server/SIP provider as client and the call is successfully received 
 by my Asterisk server (named as starwars).
 
 Now, the extentions.conf file states, the incoming INTO * should go out to 
 fxo as below:
 
 exten = s,1,Dial(Zap/1/403142142)
 exten = s,2,Dial(Zap/1/403132663)
 exten = s,3,hangup
 
 whereas other file config is as below:
 
 zapata.conf
 [channels]
 relaxdtmf=yes
 callwaiting=yes
 callwaitingcallerid=yes
 threewaycalling=yes
 transfer=yes
 cancallforward=yes
 usecallerid=yes
 echocancel=yes
 echocancelwhenbridged=yes
 rxgain=0.0
 txgain=0.0
 immediate=yes
 context=bell
 signalling=fxs_ks
 callerid=asreceived
 channel = 1
 
 zaptel
 
 fxsks=1
 loadzone=us
 defaultzone=us
 
 sip.conf
 register = 7062210:9211:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 [MyService]
 type=peer
 username=7062210
 fromuser=7062210
 secret=9211
 host=192.168.7.16
 context=incoming
 fromdomain=sipdom.inf
 nat=no
 canreinvite=no
 dtmfmode=inband
 
 
 so whenever the call comes in from service provider's asterisk to my 
 starwars asterisk, I get the error messages captured below:
 
 
 starwars*CLI sip show registry
 HostUsername   Refresh State
 192.168.7.16:5060   7062210105 Registered
 -- Executing Dial(SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790, Zap/1/67742142) in new 
 stack
 Nov 30 01:41:52 NOTICE[507921]: app_dial.c:742 dial_exec: Unable to create 
 channel of type 'Zap'
   == Everyone is busy/congested at this time
 -- Executing Dial(SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790, Zap/1/61002663) in new 
 stack
 Nov 30 01:41:52 NOTICE[507921]: app_dial.c:742 dial_exec: Unable to create 
 channel of type 'Zap'
   == Everyone is busy/congested at this time
 -- Executing Hangup(SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790, ) in new stack
   == Spawn extension (incoming, s, 3) exited non-zero on 
 'SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790'
 -- Executing Dial(SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790, Zap/1/67742142) in new 
 stack
 Nov 30 01:41:52 NOTICE[524305]: app_dial.c:742 dial_exec: Unable to create 
 channel of type 'Zap'
   == Everyone is busy/congested at this time
 -- Executing Dial(SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790, Zap/1/61002663) in new 
 stack
 Nov 30 01:41:52 NOTICE[524305]: app_dial.c:742 dial_exec: Unable to create 
 channel of type 'Zap'
   == Everyone is busy/congested at this time
 -- Executing Hangup(SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790, ) in new stack
   == Spawn extension (incoming, s, 3) exited non-zero on 
 'SIP/192.168.7.14-085a4790'
 
 
 please note the output of the following commands:
 
 starwars*CLI zap show channels
Chan Extension  Context Language   MusicOnHold
 pseudodefaultdefault
 
 starwars*CLI zap show channel 1
 Unable to find given channel 1
 
 starwars*CLI sip show registry
 HostUsername   Refresh State
 192.168.7.16:5060   7062210105 Registered
 
 starwars*CLI sip show peers
 Name/usernameHostDyn Nat ACL Mask Port 
 Status
 MyService/7062210  192.168.7.16255.255.255.255  5060 
 Unmonitored


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Directed call pickup

2004-11-29 Thread Matthew Marlowe
Is anyone successfully using directed call pickup with asterisk?

*8exten to only pick up that persons extension if the phone is
ringing.. It says in the wiki asterisk supports it but I can not get
it to work..
Thanks


-- 
MBM
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Vonage integration... Hardware or Softphone type acct.

2004-11-29 Thread Angus Berry
Hi All,

I've got an * PBX up with couple of stations and now I'd like to
integrate my Vonage service for outgoing PSTN calls. Is this possible if
I have an account with them that uses their hardware box (ATA186) or do
I need a 'softphone' account?

thanks...

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Directed call pickup

2004-11-29 Thread Peter Svensson
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Matthew Marlowe wrote:

 Is anyone successfully using directed call pickup with asterisk?
 
 *8exten to only pick up that persons extension if the phone is
 ringing.. It says in the wiki asterisk supports it but I can not get
 it to work..

You could use app_intercept from
  http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=0002692

Peter


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] overriding DTMF and codec from dialplan?

2004-11-29 Thread Michael Manousos
Brian West wrote:
OH But it is just that simple. 

You also have:
  -= Info about application 'ImportVar' =-
[Synopsis]:
Set variable to value
[Description]:
  ImportVar(#n=channel|variable): Sets variable n to variable as evaluated
on
the specified channel (instead of current).  If prefixed with _, single
inheritance assumed.  If prefixed with __, infinite inheritance is assumed.
I give up, my mistake.

bkw

It's not so simple. Check
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=928
for the details.

Michael.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: IAX2 and FWD problems?

2004-11-29 Thread Jim Van Meggelen

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Wilson Pickett
 Sent: November 29, 2004 1:53 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: IAX2 and FWD problems?
 
 
  If there are problems with FWD's IAX gateway,  please
  fill out a trouble report at FWD.   If enough of us do it,
  the guys on the desk will realize there really is a problem and let 
  someone know!
 
 Hi Ed,
 
 You can't not know that this has been talked about for weeks 
 on the Pulver board, including people saying they sent 
 trouble tickets with no reply. 

I'm sure he does know. 

 The conclusion most people 
 have drawn is basically what you state, that FWD is experimental.

Keep in mind that Ed does not own Pulver, and is almost certainly not
the sole decision-maker with repect to their policies.

What I hear him saying is that the more of us that make our voices heard
with respect to FWD and IAX, the easier it will be for him to make IAX
support a priority for rest of the executive team at Pulver.

If you'll recall, Ed represented Pulver at Astricon (and gave a VERY
enjoyable and informative presentation; thanks Ed) so be assured that Ed
is someone who champions Asterisk and IAX.

  IAX will be fully supported in the very near future!

Can't be any plainer than that. We can help speed up the process by
doing some cheering for IAX.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] How to rid yourself of Broadvoice

2004-11-29 Thread Tim Mattison
If you're having problems cancelling your Broadvoice service like I was
simply do the following:

1) Dial 1-978-418-7300 (don't block your caller ID/CPN).
2) Announce your displeasure with the service to their voicemail (it
should tell you something that you have to leave voicemail to get
support).  Expletives will reduce the waiting in step 3 from 10 minutes
to 5 minutes.
3) Wait 10 minutes and your phone will ring with a Broadvoice
representative ready to receive your appreciation for being a great
company.

After two months of no service, dozens of e-mails and phone calls, and
canned we don't support Asterisk responses this finally got the job
done.  American Express is doing the rest of the legwork in getting my
$30+ back for the entire month the service didn't work.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Fwd: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Adit 600 channel bank in UK setting]

2004-11-29 Thread Peter Hoppe
Jon,
I actually had some more discussions with Tim on this issue, and it seems that the channel bank 
would still be a good option to choose for internal purposes. I would not see any other solution 
than a channel bank to connect many 2wire phones into one asterisk box. I had a talk today with 
Carrier Access, and it seems that the adit would do us fine. The fxs cards of the adit 600 are 
actually reprogrammable for uk phones (dip switches). We have requested a test platform from CAC 
which I hope would arrive here shortly, and we would test how the fxs ports work with different uk 
phones.

I would really be unhappy to scratch our existing phone cable network and to lay an entire new LAN 
and to buy many IP phones. First of all - new installations always have teething problems. Then the 
admin headache with the many IP phones. Also - the solution doesn't scale very easily. For each new 
phones we need a new network socket... or a hub. Then one mains connection per phone (with power 
supply - more fire risk). And on and on... Using 2wire phones eliminates all that - cables are there 
already, users can buy any phone they like, we can put in additional sockets without admin effort 
and so on. Really - 2wire rocks!

The pstn connectivity is an entirely different matter. The fxo cards of the adit600 seem not to be 
EU approved for public ( = pstn) connection (mainly) because of emission regulations. Also, I would 
not be sure how well the impedances of the fxo ports and the BT lines match (Echo problem, noise 
etc.). I am looking into using a voip gateway with fxo ports for our BT line connectivity. I found 
one on sale on a UK website, see

http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2004-November/075118.html
However, it looks to me more and more that for our internal phones we use the adit 600. Lets see 
what the testing will show...

Peter

On Thursday 18 November 2004 22:16, Tim Robinson wrote:
Channel banks are a peculiar US thing. Be careful!  You will almost
certainly be better off using voip handsets (SNOMs are cool, avoid
Grandstream for anything other than domestic environment) and a few
Sipura-type ATA's for the analogue fax machines etc. or some Digium
analogue cards.
So what would you advise using in the UK to interface with standard 2 wire 
phones - I'm trying to avoid having to use ata type adapters.

Jon

--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world,
those who understand binary, and those who don't.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] TOS Settings to DSCP

2004-11-29 Thread Keith O'Brien








I am assuming that the TOS values directly map to DSCP
values in the ip header. Is this a correct assumption? If so, can someone
tell me the correct setting to set call control packets with a DSCP of AF31(011010) and media
with EF(101110)? So would the setting for AF be TOS=46?? Is it
possible to mark the media and call control separately??






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] TOS Settings to DSCP

2004-11-29 Thread Keith O'Brien








I am assuming that the TOS values directly map to DSCP
values in the ip header. Is this a correct assumption? If so, can someone
tell me the correct setting to set call control packets with a DSCP of AF31(011010) and media
with EF(101110)? So would the setting for AF be TOS=46?? Is it
possible to mark the media and call control separately??






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Variable substitution - How can I do Dial(${DIALSTRING}) where ${DIALSTRING} is 'SIP/201, 15, tT'?

2004-11-29 Thread Nick Barnes

I've been banging my head against a brick wall for the last hour and I'm
sure this is one of those easy to solve things - just that I can't see the
wood for the trees.

I'm trying to do:

---

[some-context]
Exten = s,1,Macro(dodial,'SIP/201,15,tT',123456,MOHClass)

[macro-dodial]
Exten = s,1,SetCallerID(${ARG2})
Exten = s,2,SetMusicOnHold(${ARG3})
Exten = s,3,Dial(${ARG1})

---

(there's a lot more to it than that, but the above should give you an idea
of what I'm trying to achieve)

A command starting at some-context,s,1 returns the following error:

-- Executing Macro(SIP/200-b9d9,
dodial|SIP/201,15,tT|123456|MOHClass) in new stack
-- Executing SetCallerID(SIP/200-b9d9, 123456) in new stack
-- Executing SetMusicOnHold(SIP/200-b9d9, MOHClass) in new stack
Nov 29 19:43:09 WARNING[802835]: pbx.c:1280 pbx_extension_helper: No
application 'Dial{${ARG1})' for extension (macro-dodial, s, 5)
  == Spawn extension (macro-dodial, s, 5) exited non-zero on 'SIP/200-b9d9'
in macro 'dodial'
  == Spawn extension (from-sip, 201, 2) exited non-zero on 'SIP/200-b9d9'

Is there any way I can achieve this without having to pass each of the dial
parameters to the macro individually?

Cheers,

Nick.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Prepaid

2004-11-29 Thread Sebastian Atala
Is anyone successfully using asterisk-prepaid-0.3.1?

I try to configure but doesn't work. It said that you need to do a few step,
copy a few files and that is.

Please, if someone has any tips about the configuration, answer me.

Sebastian
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 TDM400P cards?

2004-11-29 Thread Graeme Ogilvie



Has anybody managed 
to get Fedora Core 3 and the zapata drivers working with the TDM400P 
cards?

Everything is going 
fine untilI do 

modprobe 
mcfxs

Any ideas? 
It's a straight install of Fedora Core 3.

Graeme
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] IAXy power source from Radio Shack

2004-11-29 Thread Wilson Pickett
Anyone using this 110-220v 9v  1500ma supply? If so, which DC plug
adapter does the IAXy need?

A friend brought the wall wart over here for me but she said you get
one plug free and she didn't know which one it took. Does anyone here
know?

http://www.radioshack.com/category.asp?catalog%5Fname=CTLGcategory%5Fname=CTLG%5F009%5F001%5F001%5F003Page=1
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Uniden UIP200 -- configured, but not working?

2004-11-29 Thread Ryan Courtnage

On Mon, 2004-29-11 at 00:21 -0500, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
 no calls actually take place, either 
 in-bound or out-bound.  With sip debug going, I get this:

 The phone's firmware rev. is BS4.59a
 
 The unidenmac.txt file is as follows:
 
 MyLcdDisplay22
 MyDialNumber22
 UserNameForRegistrar22
 PasswordForRegistrarfoo
 TimeDisplay Enable

Try adding :

UserNameForProxy   22
PasswordForProxy   foo


 Lastly, if, in the unidencom.txt file, I put a proxy bit in, I get an 
 honest-to-goodness busy signal, which certainly seems better than 
 nothing.  But I'm not using a proxy -- I'm going straight to the 
 Asterisk box.

I don't use a proxy either, but always define ProxyServer and
OutboundProxy1 in unidencom.txt (in addition to Registrar1/2)

Ryan

PS: Try using Ethereal to debug problems like this.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Fwd: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Adit 600 channel bank in UK setting]

2004-11-29 Thread Jon Lawrence
On Monday 29 November 2004 19:12, Peter Hoppe wrote:
 Jon,

 I actually had some more discussions with Tim on this issue, and it seems
 that the channel bank would still be a good option to choose for internal
 purposes. I would not see any other solution than a channel bank to connect
 many 2wire phones into one asterisk box. I had a talk today with Carrier
 Access, and it seems that the adit would do us fine. The fxs cards of the
 adit 600 are actually reprogrammable for uk phones (dip switches). We have
 requested a test platform from CAC which I hope would arrive here shortly,
 and we would test how the fxs ports work with different uk phones.

I'd be interested if you could report back to the list with your findings.


 I would really be unhappy to scratch our existing phone cable network and
 to lay an entire new LAN and to buy many IP phones. First of all - new
 installations always have teething problems. Then the admin headache with
 the many IP phones. Also - the solution doesn't scale very easily. For each
 new phones we need a new network socket... or a hub. Then one mains
 connection per phone (with power supply - more fire risk). And on and on...
 Using 2wire phones eliminates all that - cables are there already, users
 can buy any phone they like, we can put in additional sockets without admin
 effort and so on. Really - 2wire rocks!

Wiring isn't my problem - all our connections are over cat5e. In our building 
we rent out most of the offices, the clients provide their own phones and we 
simply provide the lines. Some of their phones look pretty expensive, so I'd 
rather not tell them that they can't use them anymore.
As with any office scenario power sockets are an issue - people never put 
enough in when they design the rooms.

 The pstn connectivity is an entirely different matter. 

Our connection is via pri so this isn't  a great issue.

Jon
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Variable substitution - How can I do Dial(${DIALSTRING}) where ${DIALSTRING} is 'SIP/201, 15, tT'?

2004-11-29 Thread Christopher L. Wade
Nick Barnes wrote:
snip
Exten = s,3,Dial(${ARG1})
snip
---
Nov 29 19:43:09 WARNING[802835]: pbx.c:1280 pbx_extension_helper: No
application 'Dial{${ARG1})' for extension (macro-dodial, s, 5)
snip
Look very close at this output.  Unless you did a copy-and-paste of your 
extensions.conf segment, I would say that you typed, in your actual 
extensions.conf, 'Dial{${ARG1})' instead of 'Dial(${ARG1})'.  Notice the 
'{' vs '(' ?  That, or did you type out that entire CLI output?

Anyway, my $0.00. (feeling stingy today :)
Chris
--
Christopher L. Wade Unistar-Sparco Computers, Inc.
Senior Systems Administratordba Sparco.com
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7089 Ryburn Drive
Phone: (901) 872 2272 / (800) 840 8400Millington, TN 38053
Fax:   (901) 872 8482  USA
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] fxo connection in the UK

2004-11-29 Thread Stephan Wik
On 29 Nov 2004, at 17:30, Peter Hoppe wrote:
 Micronet SP5054 VoIP Gateway 4 FXO Ports
We bought one of these units and had a lot of grief with them. The SIP 
firmware isn't great at all IMHO. For H.323 they work just fine.

Stephan Wik
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 TDM400P cards?

2004-11-29 Thread Rich Adamson
 Has anybody managed to get Fedora Core 3 and the zapata drivers working with 
 the TDM400P 
cards?
  
 Everything is going fine until I do
  
 modprobe mcfxs
  
 Any ideas?  It's a straight install of Fedora Core 3.

The driver for the TDM400P card is wctdm. Not sure what a mcfxs happens
to be. The old wcfxs was renamed to wctdm some time ago.




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom Reboot Script PRI errors!!

2004-11-29 Thread Simon Brown
Has anyone written an equivalent script to remote reboot Cisco 79XX phones?

Simon 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Baker
Sent: Monday, 29 November 2004 17:29
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom Reboot Script PRI errors!!

Kevin wrote:
 There is a reboot script posted on the wiki to reboot Polycom 
 telephones.  When I execute this script, I get the following messages.
 I am concerned as this is causing issues with asterisk and the PRI.
 Does anyone have any ideas why this would be happening?
 
 
 
 asterisk console:
 
 -- Remote UNIX connection
 -- Remote UNIX connection disconnected
 
 and in the Asterisk Log:
 
 Nov 28 22:30:42 NOTICE[1099909936]: PRI got event: 6 on Primary 
 D-channel of span 1 Nov 28 22:43:08 NOTICE[1099909936]: PRI got event: 
 6 on Primary D-channel of span 1
 
 
 Script:
 
 #!/usr/bin/perl -w
 
 use Net::Ping;
 use Socket;
 
 $polycompath = '/home//';# Where you keep your config files
 $arp = '/sbin/arp';  # Location of arp command
 $sipserver   = '192.168.XXX.XXX';  # IP of asterisk server
 
 $phone = shift;
 
 checkphone($phone);
 touch( arp2config($phone) );
 
 reboot_sip_phone( $phone, $sipserver, Reboot );
 
 sub checkphone { # Checks for existence of phone, makes sure
  # it's in arp table
 $activephone = shift;
 
 # Populate ARP table
 print Checking ARP table.\n;
 $p = Net::Ping-new(icmp);
 if ( $p-ping( $activephone, 2 ) ) {
 print $activephone is ;
 print reachable.\n;
 }
 else { die Polycom at , $activephone,  is not reachable!; }
 sleep(1);
 $p-close();
 
 }
 
 sub arp2config {# Gets mac address from arp table, converts
 # to a polycom config filename, makes sure
 # the config file exists
 $arpip = shift;
 open( ARP, $arp -an| ) || die Couldn't open arp table: $!\n;
 print checking for polycom config name..., \n;
 while (ARP) {
 chomp;
 $addr = $_;
 $ip   = $_;
 $addr =~ s/.*
 ([\d\w]+:[\d\w]+:[\d\w]+:[\d\w]+:[\d\w]+:[\d\w]+).*/$1/;
 $addr =~ s/://g;
 $addr = lc($addr) . '.cfg';
 $ip =~ s/.*?(\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+).*/$1/;
 if ( $ip eq $arpip ) {
 last;
 }
 }
 
 $polycomconfig = $polycompath . $addr;
 
 unless ( -e $polycomconfig ) {
 print sorry, polycom config file , $polycomconfig,
is not found.\n\n;
 exit;
 }
 
 return $polycomconfig;
 }
 
 sub touch {# We need to touch the config files or the phone
# won't reboot - it depends on time synchronization
 
 print touching config file , $polycomconfig, \n;
 my $now = time;
 local (*TMP);
 foreach my $file (@_) {
 utime( $now, $now, $file )
   || open( TMP, $file )
   || die ($0: Couldn't touch file: $!\n);
 }
 }
 
 sub reboot_sip_phone {# Send the phone a check-sync to reboot it
 $phone_ip = shift;
 
 $local_ip = shift;
 $sip_to   = shift;
 $sip_from = 0;
 $tm   = time();
 $call_id  = $tm . msgto$sip_to;
 $httptime = `date -R`;
 $MESG = NOTIFY sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0
 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP $local_ip
 From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Event: check-sync
 Date: $httptime
 Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 CSeq: 1300 NOTIFY
 Contact: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Content-Length: 0
 
 ;
 
 $proto = getprotobyname('udp');
 socket( SOCKET, PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, $proto );
 $iaddr = inet_aton($phone_ip);
 $paddr = sockaddr_in( 5060, $iaddr );
 bind( SOCKET, $paddr );
 $port = 5060;
 
 $hisiaddr = inet_aton($phone_ip);
 $hispaddr = sockaddr_in( $port, $hisiaddr );
 
 if ( send( SOCKET, $MESG, 0, $hispaddr ) ) {
 print reboot of phone , $phone_ip,  was successful, \n;
 }
 else { print reboot of phone , $phone_ip,  failed, \n; }
 
 }
 exit;
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 


Kevin -

I rewrote this some time ago because of some issues with Polycom's latest
bootroom/sip update.  Try this:

Also, serctl, part of the ser package, has a cisco_restart parameter that
works on Polycoms as well.

John



#!/usr/bin/perl -w

use Net::Ping;
use Socket;

$polycompath = '/home/PlcmSpIp/';# Where you keep your polycom files
$arp = '/sbin/arp';  # Location of arp command
$sipserver   = '192.168.XXX.XXX';  # IP of asterisk server

$phone = shift;

checkphone($phone);
touch( arp2config($phone) );

reboot_sip_phone( $phone, $sipserver, get_extension($phone) );

sub checkphone { # Checks for existence 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] OH323 Rocks :) --- H323 guys, use it to solve no answer at this time problem!!!

2004-11-29 Thread Nahuel Alejandro Ramos
Thank you very much. I have been trying it but I get in trouble installing it
I will try it again.

  Nahuel Ramos.


On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 12:11:20 +0200, Michael Manousos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Thanks.
 I appreciate that.
 
 Michael.
 
 
 
 
 kido noagbodji wrote:
  i have had some problems with the H323 channel ... Other party not
  anwsering SIP 2 H323 bridge.
  the chan_oh323 solves the problem. Use it.
  (Even though it is quite complicated to install but READ the README file)
 
  Nahuel that should solve it!!
 
  Kido
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 TDM400P cards?

2004-11-29 Thread Michael Graves
--Original Message Text---
From: Graeme Ogilvie
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:45:41 -

Has anybody managed to get Fedora Core 3 and the zapata drivers working with 
the TDM400P cards? 
 
Everything is going fine until I do  
 
modprobe mcfxs 
 
Any ideas?  It's a straight install of Fedora Core 3. 
 
Graeme 

I tried to use FC3 in rebuilding an * server over the weekend. However,
the Anaconda installer failed very early in the install so I ended up
going back to FC1. The TDM400P works great though!

Michael


--
Michael Graves   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Product Specialist  www.pixelpower.com
Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

o713-861-4005
o800-905-6412
c713-201-1262



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: IAX2 and FWD problems?

2004-11-29 Thread Michael Graves
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:03:42 -0500, Jim Van Meggelen wrote:

What I hear him saying is that the more of us that make our voices heard
with respect to FWD and IAX, the easier it will be for him to make IAX
support a priority for rest of the executive team at Pulver.

If you'll recall, Ed represented Pulver at Astricon (and gave a VERY
enjoyable and informative presentation; thanks Ed) so be assured that Ed
is someone who champions Asterisk and IAX.

  IAX will be fully supported in the very near future!

Can't be any plainer than that. We can help speed up the process by
doing some cheering for IAX.

Whatever the case in the future I see from a simple test that IAX2 to
FWD is working a of 2pm CST.

Michael

--
Michael Graves   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sr. Product Specialist  www.pixelpower.com
Pixel Power Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

o713-861-4005
o800-905-6412
c713-201-1262



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Polycom Reboot Script PRI errors!!

2004-11-29 Thread Christopher L. Wade
Simon Brown wrote:
Has anyone written an equivalent script to remote reboot Cisco 79XX phones?
Simon 

Check the wiki... there are two versions for cisco, one that uses the 
check-sync sip message, the other that simply logs into the phone via 
telnet and 'reset's the phone.  I have made some changes to the latter 
and use it in production along with some other console commands to 
remotely setup things like my intercom line, server push, etc.

Anyway, the wiki link is 
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+phone+cisco+79xx

If you look about 1/3 way down the page you'll see a link to 'reboot.pl' 
pointing to http://mklein.bendtel.net/mkreboot.pl

That should get you going.
Chris
--
Christopher L. Wade Unistar-Sparco Computers, Inc.
Senior Systems Administratordba Sparco.com
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7089 Ryburn Drive
Phone: (901) 872 2272 / (800) 840 8400Millington, TN 38053
Fax:   (901) 872 8482  USA
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3 TDM400P cards?

2004-11-29 Thread Graeme Ogilvie
The card must have shipped with some old documentation then.

I'll give that a go tomorrow.

Thanks.

Graeme 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Adamson
Sent: 29 November 2004 20:01
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fedora Core 3  TDM400P cards?

 Has anybody managed to get Fedora Core 3 and the zapata drivers 
 working with the TDM400P
cards?
  
 Everything is going fine until I do
  
 modprobe mcfxs
  
 Any ideas?  It's a straight install of Fedora Core 3.

The driver for the TDM400P card is wctdm. Not sure what a mcfxs happens to
be. The old wcfxs was renamed to wctdm some time ago.




___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage integration... Hardware or Softphone typeacct.

2004-11-29 Thread Jay Milk
Vonage hard lines only run through an FXO port.  There's no feasible
way to get the SIP credentials in order to terminate directly into *.
You can terminate a soft line directly into asterisk, both for
incoming and outgoing calls -- for configuration examples, simply search
the list archives (use google and add site:lists.digium.com to your
search-term).

 -Original Message-
 From: Angus Berry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 12:27 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Vonage integration... Hardware or 
 Softphone typeacct.
 
 
 Hi All,
 
 I've got an * PBX up with couple of stations and now I'd like 
 to integrate my Vonage service for outgoing PSTN calls. Is 
 this possible if I have an account with them that uses their 
 hardware box (ATA186) or do I need a 'softphone' account?
 
 thanks...
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/aster isk-users
 To 
 UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Packet8 integration into Asterisk?

2004-11-29 Thread John Fach
Hello everybody

Does anybody may tell me how to make the configuration SIP on Asterisk
for one Packet8 account?

I want to use it with my Asterisk

Regards

John F
---
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Comparision of IAX2, FWD, iaxtel etc etc.

2004-11-29 Thread Mike Dent
Hi,

I've been setting up * recently and slowly getting to grips with it, however
I'm getting rather confused with all the different configs for IAX
calls, FWD calls
iaxtel etc etc. What I think I need it a basic understanding or even a
comparison of
these different voip systems (if thats what they are?)

I'd like to be able to make calls to other voip users, both in the UK and abroad
and also make calls out on to the UK and US networks if possible.

I'd also like to receive calls via a voip number?

My * box is on my local LAN behind a nat router if that helps.

Many thanks
Mike
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] asterisk newsgrup proposal or phpBB forum

2004-11-29 Thread Corvin
Hi all,

I can see huge traffic here over 400 post in 4 days.
My proposal is to create asterisk newsgrup proposal or phpBB forum
what do think about it ?

BR,
Corvin

btw. I'm admin of phpBB Forum (slackware forum - polish language), nearly 900 
users. I think if someone will prepare it good it can be great project.

(but I have 7 person team). 

 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   3   >