Re: [Asterisk-Users] `hint` priority and Polycom 500

2005-06-01 Thread Kristian Kielhofner

Olle E. Johansson wrote:

Sean Kennedy wrote:


Hi all,

I'm trying to see if I can get the hint priority working with my polycom
500.

So far I have 2 /reg entries with the same sip registration, one is
labeled as private, the other as shared.  I have set the hint priority
before anything else in my dialplan for my extensions.  As it stands, I
have two registrations on the phone, one has a half greyed out phone
icon, the other is a full icon.  However, when I place a call to that
phone, the shared line display doesn't change.



Currently we don't support the shared line implementation in a lot of
phones. I don't know how the Polycom implements shared lines yet, but if
I get hold of one I'll take a look. Maybe someone on the list knows?

/Olle


Astricon - the Asterisk User's conference - Madrid June 15-17
http://www.astricon.net/europe/ - Register today!


Olle,

	If you need a Polycom, let me know where I can send one of my IP 600's. 
 Seriously, contact me off list!


--
Kristian Kielhofner
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] newbie with kphone and asterisk

2005-06-01 Thread Sukardi Shahdan
hello all,

i have already configure sip.conf and dialplan.
i done the follow me script.

first problem:

i want to call(with kphone) someone at my extension, i
must dial the extension number.
i can't dial their username.

  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  (call fail)
is it possible to do that??

second problem:

if i want to call another number (not my extension)
with my kphone also fail.
example if i call my mobile than it fail.
where i must configure so my asterisk can do that??

my sip.conf:

[general]
context=default  
bindport=5060   
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
srvlookup=yes   
disallow=all   
allow=ulaw   

[mustafa]
type=friend
secret=mustafa
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=inband
mailbox=1604

extension.conf:

exten = 20531604,1,Dial(SIP/mustafa,20)
exten = 20531604,2,playback(pls-wait-connect-call)
exten = 20531604,3,Setvar(NewCaller=${CALLERIDNUM})
exten = 20531604,4,SetCIDNum(0${CALLERIDNUM})
exten = 20531604,5,dial(${TRUNK}/0193041624,20,r)
exten = 20531604,6,SetCIDNum(${NewCaller})
exten = 20531604,7,VoiceMail(u1604)
exten = 20531604,8,Hangup

can anyone give an advise or some idea??
please..

thanks..

regard:
shahdan



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phone always busy after caller hangup

2005-06-01 Thread stevanus

Hi,

If you use digium card, then maybe you set wrong signaling on fxs...


Best regards,

Stevanus

Tim P wrote:


I have multiple sipura 2100 boxes connected to my * box and for some
reason that i cannot figure out when making a call to one and
answering it and then hanging up results in the line be permanently
busy (the phone called is permanently busy until * is rebooted).  Any
idea where to start with this one?  It seems to me that either the
SPA2100 is not registering the end of the call or * isn't.  I suspect
the SPA2100 but see nothing in the logs or in the SPA config to
indicate a fix.  Any ideas?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Phone always busy after caller hangup

2005-06-01 Thread Terry H. Gilsenan
Hi,

The problem is that the Sipura boxes don't do call progress monitoring. I
saw this on a thread about a week ago. 

If the call is dropped at the * side, then the sip channel is droppeds and
the sipura will drop the PSTN connection. However if the Sipura has trouble
with the PSTN's start/stop process (Signalling) then the sipura may think
that the call is still connected if the remote (PSTN) side terminates the
call.

Regards,
T

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of stevanus
 Sent: Wednesday, 1 June 2005 5:37 PM
 To: Tim P; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phone always busy after caller hangup
 
 Hi,
 
 If you use digium card, then maybe you set wrong signaling on fxs...
 
 
 Best regards,
 
 Stevanus
 
 Tim P wrote:
 
 I have multiple sipura 2100 boxes connected to my * box and for some 
 reason that i cannot figure out when making a call to one 
 and answering 
 it and then hanging up results in the line be permanently busy (the 
 phone called is permanently busy until * is rebooted).  Any 
 idea where 
 to start with this one?  It seems to me that either the 
 SPA2100 is not 
 registering the end of the call or * isn't.  I suspect the 
 SPA2100 but 
 see nothing in the logs or in the SPA config to indicate a fix.  Any 
 ideas?
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
   
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Built-In Transfer Questions

2005-06-01 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 06:45, Jennifer Hales wrote:
 Hello Matthew,

 You need to put exten = o,1,Hangup underneath your voicemail macro, then
 if your dial zero the call will come back to you, however it does read back
 an error in your ear.  It still works.

... or alternatively, if you add the 'h' option to the Dial command, you will 
be able to hang up by pressing the * key on your phone (or if you use CVS, 
any sequence you define as disconnect in the [featuremap] section of 
features.conf)

Cheers,
Gavin.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Dynamic IAX Server

2005-06-01 Thread chawki hammoud
Hi:

I read many documents and I posted my question several
times here without luck. I hope someone can help now
please. Here is an example to demonstarte my problem:

Suppose you manage the FWD server, how do you define
an IAX client behind nat so he can receive calls from
FWD.

NAT client would register with FWD to let it know how
to locate it. I just don't see how FWD finds the nat
client. How is that translated in terms of IAX.conf
contexts and what FWD dial in extensions.conf file.

Regards;
Chawki



__ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Phone always busy after caller hangup

2005-06-01 Thread Kulbir Saini
hi,

i m new to asterisk word, pl. help me for the below scenario

i have installed TDM22B card. Module is - wcfxs
i m in India so first of all wat zone is to specified is not defined?
Zaptel.conf is -
fxoks=1-2
fxsks=3-4

# ztcfg   parses it cleanly.

Zapata.conf contains-

signalling=fxo_ks 
callerid=asreceived
group=1
context=default ; points to the default context of extensions.conf file.
channel=1-2 ;for FXS interfaces on the TDM22 card installed.
signalling=fxs_ks ; to signal an internal FXO inferaces
group=2
context=incoming
channel=3-4

its just simple configuration.

running asterisk gives error -
unable to specify channel 1: no such device
unable to register channel 1-2
On 6/1/05, stevanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,If you use digium card, then maybe you set wrong signaling on fxs...Best regards,StevanusTim P wrote:I have multiple sipura 2100 boxes connected to my * box and for some
reason that i cannot figure out when making a call to one andanswering it and then hanging up results in the line be permanentlybusy (the phone called is permanently busy until * is rebooted).Any
idea where to start with this one?It seems to me that either theSPA2100 is not registering the end of the call or * isn't.I suspectthe SPA2100 but see nothing in the logs or in the SPA config to
indicate a fix.Any ideas?___Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users___Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Kulbir SinghEon Infotech LimitedSCO 315-316Sector 35-BChandigarh - 160 022 INDIAt: +91 172 2609849
f: +91 172 2615465m: 09872822266
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] When to use 'Answer' and when NOT to...

2005-06-01 Thread Chris Coulthurst








While everything seems to be working for the most part
correctly in my mix-network of Zap and Sip phones, it occurred to me that every
call, regardless of whether or not it was answered, is reporting ANSWERED
in the cdr records on mysql. 



I was having problems with strange hang-ups the moment a
call went off hook, and having Answer in the extensions.conf
contexts made it all go away.



Am I under-thinking the use of Answer()?



Chris Coulthurst

[EMAIL PROTECTED]






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] IVR Load

2005-06-01 Thread WipeOut

Hi,

Thinking about an IVR application and trying to get a handle on the best 
way to structure it so that the maximum number of concurrent calls can 
be achieved..


If the voice prompts were stored in a GSM format and were being played 
out through an IAX trunk that uses GSM compression would asterisk do a 
decompress/compress on the audio or would it simply pass through the GSM 
encoding?
Obviously if I could eliminate the decompress/compress activity is would 
make the server far more scalable..


Thanks..
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Hardware questions

2005-06-01 Thread Aitor
Hello!
I would like to know which hardware I need, to use asterisk with up to 20 
analog lines. 
Also I woul like to know if there is any card that suport both analog and isdn 
lines, and if there is any way to make the analog phones now I'm using work 
with asterisk.
Thanks
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: **POSSIBLE SPAM** [Asterisk-Users] AreskiCC - DOES IT REALLY WORK??????

2005-06-01 Thread David Choo
I think we should be thankful that the authors are relasing the software,
rather then crying out loud when you cannot get it to work. More people
will be willing to help you that way. Be ashamed of yourself!

Best Regards,

==
David Choo
Sales Engineer
Business  Technology Division
Engineered for Changing Businesses
Espore Corp Pte Ltd
68 Kallang Pudding Rd
#04-03 SYH Logistics Bldg
Singapore 349327
Tel: 65-6842 2725, Ext - 404
Fax : 65-6842 2724
E-mail :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=

Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message. If
you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy it or use it for any
purpose, nor deliver this message to anyone. Instead, please delete this
message and destroy any other record of it immediately and kindly notify
the sender by return email. Thank you for your co-operation.

Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, arrive late, or contain
viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or
omissions in the context of this message nor can the sender guarantee that
this message is virus free.


   
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 t.com
 Sent by:   To 
 asterisk-users-bo asterisk-users@lists.digium.com   
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  cc 
 m.com 
   Subject 
   **POSSIBLE SPAM** [Asterisk-Users]  
 31/05/2005 11:26  AreskiCC - DOES IT REALLY   
 PMWORK??  
   
   
 Please respond to 
  Asterisk Users   
  Mailing List -   
  Non-Commercial   
Discussion 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 ists.digium.com  
   
   




Hi all,

I am quite disappointed at the application AreskiCC. I have installed
everything following the instructions  but the thing doesnt want to work.

First of all, when I start the index.php page, any name/password logs in.
After the login it takes me to a page with a single option LOGOUT

We are monitoring the database and it seems like the application doesnt
connect to it.

Does anybody in this have made this work? Can someone help me please??

Thanks,

Robson___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] UPS rating for SOHO asterisk box

2005-06-01 Thread Jean-Michel Hiver

Daryl G. Jurbala wrote:


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Jean-Michel Hiver

Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 5:22 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] UPS rating for SOHO asterisk box

   


[...]
 


Regarding this, I have done this hack yesterday:

- Remove the battery from an existing UPS
- Rewire the UPS onto biggest car lead acid battery (12v) you 
can find.


Et voila! Bigger capacity. Put the batteries in parrallel and 
you do get monstruous UPS capacity... the only trouble with 
it is that re-charging the batteries may take some time.
   


[...]

Congratulationsyou've just given this part-time small town fire
marshal and 14-year fire service veteran nightmares.

Kidsdo NOT try this at home.  The inverters in small UPSes are not
designed to deal with runtimes that exceed the batteries in them.  If
you run this setup well past the time it was designed to run (by adding
3, 4, or more times that battery capacity it was ever designed to have)
that chances of a catastrophic inverter failure (meaning flash, boom,
fire) are very real and very likely.
 


Ouch...

In the test I have done, I replaced a HR 1224W F2F1 lead acid sealed 
battery by a fulmen heavy duty 95 amp/hours battery.


The UPS flattened the battery out after 70 minutes instead of the 
original 15 minutes. However, charging *is* slow: it's been now 36 hours 
and it's still charging.


Looks like I'll be better off buying a proper smart charger along with a 
decent inverter. I wouldn't want to fry the house :)


--
Ykoz Un Max - La VoIP en pré-payé!
Essayez gratuitement - 5 crédits offerts.
--- http://ykoz.net/voip/max ---


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Unreliable DTMF detection with DISA on incoming Zap channel on bristuffed * and GSM gateway

2005-06-01 Thread Robert Rozman

Hi,

I'm getting unusable DTMF detection with DISA on incoming ZAP channel 
(bristuffed *) on quadbri from GSM gateway. DTMF detection works ok in 
normal ISDN incoming line.


How can I check what's going on ? What settings to check ?

Anyone with more experience on such scenarios ?

Thanks in advance,

regards,

Rob.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] BT101 new firmware problem (1.0.6.3)

2005-06-01 Thread Elwin Andriol

Hello,

We found out that after upgrading the firmware in our GrandStream 
BudgeTone phones, that we were not able to transfer calls anymore. We 
use the BT's own tranfering mechanisme. We can dial the phone where the 
call should be tranfered to. But after that, the original caller stays 
in music on hold on the server and there's no way to get the calling 
channel back again (not to the first receiver, nor to the transfering 
target).


At first I was thinking it had something to do with the asterisk, 
because upgraded to version 1.0.7 a week ago. Though, the strange thing 
is that we also have some elmeg/snom190's and they do not have this 
transfer problem.


Not being able to transfer calls is a major problem. I'm puzzled. I 
didn't thought upgrading a firware would distroy existing functionality.


The new firware version in the BT's is 1.0.6.3, the old firmware was 
still one of the 1.5.x series. We are unable to downgrade the firmware. 
Something to do with missing files in the older versions compared to the 
new one.


Is there anybody that has similar problems with the BT's?
Is there anybody that might have an idee or advise how to fix this?

Please

regards;
elwin

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] UPS rating for SOHO asterisk box

2005-06-01 Thread Terry H. Gilsenan


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Jean-Michel Hiver
 Sent: Wednesday, 1 June 2005 6:45 PM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] UPS rating for SOHO asterisk box
 
 Daryl G. Jurbala wrote:
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Jean-Michel Hiver
 Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 5:22 AM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] UPS rating for SOHO asterisk box
 
 
 
 [...]
   
 
 Regarding this, I have done this hack yesterday:
 
 - Remove the battery from an existing UPS
 - Rewire the UPS onto biggest car lead acid battery (12v) you can 
 find.
 
 Et voila! Bigger capacity. Put the batteries in parrallel 
 and you do 
 get monstruous UPS capacity... the only trouble with it is that 
 re-charging the batteries may take some time.
 
 
 [...]
 
 Congratulationsyou've just given this part-time small town fire 
 marshal and 14-year fire service veteran nightmares.
 
 Kidsdo NOT try this at home.  The inverters in small 
 UPSes are not 
 designed to deal with runtimes that exceed the batteries in 
 them.  If 
 you run this setup well past the time it was designed to run 
 (by adding 
 3, 4, or more times that battery capacity it was ever 
 designed to have) 
 that chances of a catastrophic inverter failure (meaning flash, boom,
 fire) are very real and very likely.
   
 
 Ouch...
 
 In the test I have done, I replaced a HR 1224W F2F1 lead acid 
 sealed battery by a fulmen heavy duty 95 amp/hours battery.
 
 The UPS flattened the battery out after 70 minutes instead of 
 the original 15 minutes. However, charging *is* slow: it's 
 been now 36 hours and it's still charging.
 
 Looks like I'll be better off buying a proper smart charger 
 along with a decent inverter. I wouldn't want to fry the house :)

I have many sites that have a 35amp Charger with 2 x 400ah 900CCA deep cycle
batteries (10 year warranty), and 1000VA inverters.

The combination makes for perfect power and about 2.5 days run time with my
network kit whish consists of several Dlink wifi access points, 1 xbox
(hacked into a router/firewall) and a vsat system.

Total cost for the power kit AUD$1400 all up, and not a single second of
downtime in over a year.

On the flipside, I have seen a ups flare when the transformer overheated and
melted the varnish, nasty!

Regards,
T

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Problems hanging up PSTN line

2005-06-01 Thread db_nz






I am having problems with * not hanging up an incoming PSTN line, if that line is not answered before the person calling in hangs up.The line hangs in various states, it has hung with a busy tone, with no tone at all. I am running [EMAIL PROTECTED] and have a digium 4port line card. This wasconfigured by the genzaptel command I then added trunks for each line. I also have a Pulver WiSip phone which I need to be able to transfercalls on by dialing a prefix. Eg *2ext Any help on either problem would be greatly appreciated, I'm stilllearning my way around the whole *  [EMAIL PROTECTED] thing. Rick








___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems hanging up PSTN line

2005-06-01 Thread Terry H. Gilsenan



Hi,

What version of Asterisk @ Home are you 
using?

I had problems like that until I upgraded to version 
1.0

The problem has not recurred since.

Regards,T

  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, 1 June 2005 7:24 
  PMTo: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: 
  [Asterisk-Users] Problems hanging up PSTN line
  
  I am having problems with * not hanging up an incoming PSTN line, if that line is not answered before the person calling in hangs up.The line hangs in various states, it has hung with a busy tone, with no tone at all. I am running [EMAIL PROTECTED] and have a digium 4port line card. This wasconfigured by the genzaptel command I then added trunks for each line. I also have a Pulver WiSip phone which I need to be able to transfercalls on by dialing a prefix. Eg *2ext Any help on either problem would be greatly appreciated, I'm stilllearning my way around the whole *  [EMAIL PROTECTED] thing. Rick
  
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] UPS rating for SOHO asterisk box

2005-06-01 Thread Jean-Michel Hiver



I have many sites that have a 35amp Charger with 2 x 400ah 900CCA deep cycle
batteries (10 year warranty), and 1000VA inverters.
 

Those deep cycles batteries look quite appropriate... in which kind of 
store do you get them?



The combination makes for perfect power and about 2.5 days run time with my
network kit whish consists of several Dlink wifi access points, 1 xbox
(hacked into a router/firewall) and a vsat system.

Total cost for the power kit AUD$1400 all up, and not a single second of
downtime in over a year.
 


Looks pretty cool :)


On the flipside, I have seen a ups flare when the transformer overheated and
melted the varnish, nasty!
 

Woops! Well, at the moment I have only 95 amp/hour and the power drain 
on the UPS is pretty low (about 130W). Still, it looks like I need to 
get a proper charger / inverter :-/


Cheers,
Jean-Michel.

--
Ykoz Un Max - La VoIP en pré-payé!
Essayez gratuitement - 5 crédits offerts.
--- http://ykoz.net/voip/max ---


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problems hanging up PSTN line

2005-06-01 Thread Mike Price
On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 21:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I am having problems with * not hanging up an incoming PSTN line, if that 
 line is not answered before the person calling in hangs up.
 The line hangs in various states, it has hung with a busy tone, with no tone 
 at all. 
 I am running [EMAIL PROTECTED] and have a digium 4port line card. This was
 configured by the genzaptel command I then added trunks for each line.

I think that genzaptel uses fxs_ks as the default for the fxo devices.
This need to be changed to fxs_ls. Then it should work fine.
  
  
 I also have a Pulver WiSip phone which I need to be able to transfer
 calls on by dialing a prefix. Eg *2ext
  
 Any help on either problem would be greatly appreciated, I'm still
 learning my way around the whole *  [EMAIL PROTECTED] thing.
  
Stay with it. It's worth the effort.


Mike


 Rick
 
  
 
 
 
 __
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] send and receive MMS

2005-06-01 Thread Yannick Daronnat

Hello,

did anyone already experience MMS? SMS works fine, but I can't find infos on 
how to send and receive MMS on a similar way with Asterisk.


Thanks

Daryan 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems hanging up PSTN line

2005-06-01 Thread db_nz









Im running 0.9 I will try upgrading
thanks



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry H. Gilsenan
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 9:33 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
Problems hanging up PSTN line



Hi,



What version of Asterisk
@ Home are you using?



I had problems like that
until I upgraded to version 1.0



The problem has not
recurred since.



Regards,
T











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 1 June 2005 7:24 PM
To:
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Problems
hanging up PSTN line

I am having problems with * not hanging up an incoming PSTN line, if that line is not answered before the person calling in hangs up.The line hangs in various states, it has hung with a busy tone, with no tone at all. I am running [EMAIL PROTECTED] and have a digium 4port line card. This wasconfigured by the genzaptel command I then added trunks for each line. I also have a Pulver WiSip phone which I need to be able to transfercalls on by dialing a prefix. Eg *2ext Any help on either problem would be greatly appreciated, I'm stilllearning my way around the whole *  [EMAIL PROTECTED] thing. Rick










___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] debugging zap channel

2005-06-01 Thread robert.brown01








Hi,



I cannot seem to establish what is causing my analogue line
to be generating incoming calls, so I would like to do some debugging on my Zap
channel.



Can anyone confirm the syntax? 



I have tried;



Debug channel Zap/2

Debug channel Zap/2-1

Debug channel zap/2

Debug channel zap/2-1

Debug channel zap 2

Debug channel zap 2-1

Debug channel zap 02

Debug channel 02



All of which just comes back with no such
channel.



Any help or tips would be greatly appreciated.



Robert








___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

R: R: R: R: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

2005-06-01 Thread Giordano Grandis
Hi Gavin,
I'm testing atxfer and it looks work fine, but i have a small problem:

A call B
B answer, dial atxfer extension and then the new peer (C)
If C does not answer the phone, A and B got hangup and cannot speak again

I set canreinvite to no.

Can u help me ?

Thanks
Giordano
 

-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Gavin Hamill
Inviato: martedì 31 maggio 2005 16.21
A: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Oggetto: Re: R: R: R: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

On Tuesday 31 May 2005 14:41, Giordano Grandis wrote:
 Hi Gavin,

 But...how atxfer work ?

Ehm, just the way I explained yesterday :) Just make sure you include the 't' 
option to the Dial application, in the same way you need for the old-style '#' 
blind-transfer to function.

gdh
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] hang up a SIP channel

2005-06-01 Thread Lee Lee
Hi all

i been trying to manually hangup a sip channel which is inactive.

Peer User/ANR Call ID Seq (Tx/Rx) Format
x2.xx.xx.x5 6574260125 6f06bf400e9 00102/2 UNKN (d)

i tried soft hangup callerID and User but asterisk said is not a channel.

and i tried sip show channels User and CallerID as well.

Non tell me which is the channel to soft hangup

help is appreciated
		Discover Yahoo! 
Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news & more. Check it out!___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: R: R: R: R: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

2005-06-01 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 11:01, Giordano Grandis wrote:
 Hi Gavin,
 I'm testing atxfer and it looks work fine, but i have a small problem:

 A call B
 B answer, dial atxfer extension and then the new peer (C)
 If C does not answer the phone, A and B got hangup and cannot speak again

 I set canreinvite to no.

 Can u help me ?

Hm, this is the same response as I've posted to the list earlier today :)

if you add the 'h' option to the Dial command, you will be able to hang up by 
pressing the * key on your phone ...

If C's phone does not answer, pressing * should return you to talking to A.

You can change the '*' button by changing the 'disconnect' line in 
features.conf.

Be sure to STOP NOW and restart asterisk when changing features.conf - a 
'reload' is /not/ enough.

Cheers,
Gavin.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Problem with codec negotiation

2005-06-01 Thread Mark Dutton
Title: Message



Hi everyone I am 
having trouble with codec negotiation. I have Asterisk running at the office and 
a SIP phone at home. In my sip.conf, I have allow ordered as follows: alaw 
ulaw g729 and gsm On all my office extensions, I have no allow, or 
disallow entries. My Cisco gateway is setup to do alaw ulaw g729 and gsm 
My home phone does g729 alaw and ulaw. In sip.conf, I have disallow all 
and allow g729. In all my extensions and cisco gateway I have canreinvite 
set to yes and my dial commands don't have the t option, so all sip endpoints 
can talk directly to each other (rtp). If I call from home to the 
office, calls go through fine. SIP show channels, shows that the call is g729 as 
one would expect. If I get a call from Office to home, or from PSTN (via 
Cisco) to home, the phone rings, but as soon as I answer it hangs up. 
Asterisk says: May 29 05:45:49 WARNING[7514]: channel.c:2115 
ast_channel_make_compatible: No path to translate from SIP/390-8a3b(256) to 
SIP/192.168.44.23-08acccf0( -- 
SIP/390-8a3b is ringing -- SIP/390-8a3b answered SIP/192.168.44.23-08acccf0 
May 29 05:45:55 WARNING[7514]: channel.c:2115 ast_channel_make_compatible: 
No path to translate from SIP/192.168.44.23-08acccf0( to 
SIP/390-8a3b(256) May 29 05:45:55 WARNING[7514]: app_dial.c:1006 dial_exec: 
Had to drop call because I couldn't make SIP/192.168.44.23-08acccf0 compatible 
with SIP/390-8a3b == Spawn extension (default, 390, 1) exited non-zero on 
'SIP/192.168.44.23-08acccf0'SNIP.

One week later. I have now purchased two 9.729 licences as I suspected 
Asterisk was not allowing direct endpoint negotiation. Now my home phone 
answers, but it is receiving on 9.729 and sending on 
g.711a

This leads to delays building up on the g711a 
side.

I want to calls coming to my office phones to use alaw as the prefered 
codec in sip.conf, but I want calls to my home and remote sites to be g.729. 
Asterisk seems to ignore the codec negotiation phase and insists on running two 
different codecs in two directions. Most sip servers will always use the same 
codec in both directions based on the first agreed codec. As my home phone is 
set in sip.conf to only allow g.729, then it should do g.729 in both directions. 
I see this as a bug. Anyone know how to make it work 
properly?

Thanks to the gurus who might no the answer to this 
one. Cheers Mark 


P.S. Why do the real 
experts not use the users web forum? Much easier to manage than a mailing 
list.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] pbx - fiber - network media converter - wifi - network media converter - fiber - pbx ???

2005-06-01 Thread Rich Adamson
 Please forgive the (almost?) OT post.  (and the fact that I need a clue-bat)
 
 We've got a situation at one of our sites where a construction crew is
 likely to dig up our conduit which houses some data fiber and one pair
 of fiber used to tie a Definity 3gsi at a small office building to the
 rest of the phone system (school district).  We're using a pair of
 Aeronets to the data network stays up, but haven't decided how to keep
 the phone system up yet.
 
 I wonder if it is possible to bridge what I guess it a telco t1 via
 fiber over wireless using standard media converters like we use for data
 networks?  We're able to dedicate a set of radios to this if needed.
 
 Anyone ever tried this or know the basics well enough to know that it
 (will|will not) work?
 
 Any thoughts on how a guy might use * to save the day without having to
 hack the Definity or get fiber in and out of a * box on each end?

Yes, you can use wireless to accomplish this. However, the aeronet won't
be able to accomplish this without something to convert the datastream
into IP-based dataflows (eg, two asterisk boxes with iax between).

There are wireless boxes that will operate at 70 megabits/sec and will
accept T1 interfaces, but those typically are in the $15k - $20k range.

If you can estimate the true number of simultanous calls expected across
the facility, using an asterisk box at both ends (each with a T1 card
interfacing to the respective phone equipment) might work across the
aeronets. If you really had 24 simultanous conversations going on, the
likelihood of the aeronets providing acceptable service will be very
low. The exact number of simultanous conversations will be 100% dependent
on the codec used between the asterisk boxes, the quality of the signal
between the aeronets, and the stability (including jitter) of the end-
to-end wireless link.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Ztdummy usage

2005-06-01 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:35:32PM +0100, Gentian Bajraktari wrote:

 Then try to 'modprobe zaptel' and then 'modprobe ztdummy'

'modprobe ztdummy' should load zaptel as well.

If ytou happen to use debian, add the line 'ztdummy' (without quotes) to
the file /etc/modules to modprobe it at system boot.

-- 
Tzafrir Cohen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | VIM is
http://tzafrir.org.il |   | a Mutt's  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   |  best
ICQ# 16849755 |   | friend
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] UPS rating for SOHO asterisk box

2005-06-01 Thread Rich Adamson

 I have many sites that have a 35amp Charger with 2 x 400ah 900CCA deep cycle
 batteries (10 year warranty), and 1000VA inverters.
   
 
 Those deep cycles batteries look quite appropriate... in which kind of 
 store do you get them?

In the US just about any store that sells batteries including Sears,
InterState Batteries, most automotive parts stores, etc, etc. Just 
ask them.

You see a lot of the deep cycle batteries used in fishing boats where
they power electric trolling motors. 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] A newbie question - SIP to Trunk

2005-06-01 Thread JARVISGRAHAM STEWART
Hello,

Firstly sorry for covering old ground - I'm new to this. . . .

I've read that you have to be careful when configuring SIP phone extensions
so that an incoming call can't be connected to the trunk.
Anyone have some info on how this can happen and how to stop it?

Next,
Can anyone tell me (in outline) how to set up a wifi SIP phone so that when
I'm in the office I call in/out over Asterisk and the trunk and when I go
home I can still be called from the office and still use the office Asterisk
for trunk calls.
Of course the office Asterisk is behind a NAT/firewall.

Thanks in advance.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Launching an application from within Asterisk

2005-06-01 Thread Paulo
Hello,

I need to run an application that sets a few Asterisk
variables, that will be used by AGI scrpits.
Therefore, I believe that application should be run
somehow from within Asterisk, on startup. The
application needs to be always running, since it may
need to update those variables. Is there any simple
way to do this, like running an AGI script on startup
or do I need to compile my application as an Asterisk
application?

Thanks in avance,
Paulo
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Ztdummy usage

2005-06-01 Thread Andreas Sikkema
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:35:32PM +0100, Gentian Bajraktari wrote:
 
 Then try to 'modprobe zaptel' and then 'modprobe ztdummy'
 
 'modprobe ztdummy' should load zaptel as well.

I've seen this faul, when only modprobe zaptel first would help. 
(Debian sarge)

-- 
Andreas SikkemaRits tele.com
Van Vollenhovenstraat 33016 BE Rotterdam
t: +31 (0)10 2245544  f: +31 (0)10 413 65 45 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


R: R: R: R: R: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

2005-06-01 Thread Giordano Grandis
No...maybe i don't explain u well.

After that B call C andC not answer (go in timeout), B hear first the beeperr 
and then, together A the busy tone. Now i can't re-take the call :|

Thanks
Giordano

-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Gavin Hamill
Inviato: mercoledì 1 giugno 2005 12.34
A: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Oggetto: Re: R: R: R: R: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

On Wednesday 01 June 2005 11:01, Giordano Grandis wrote:
 Hi Gavin,
 I'm testing atxfer and it looks work fine, but i have a small problem:

 A call B
 B answer, dial atxfer extension and then the new peer (C) If C does 
 not answer the phone, A and B got hangup and cannot speak again

 I set canreinvite to no.

 Can u help me ?

Hm, this is the same response as I've posted to the list earlier today :)

if you add the 'h' option to the Dial command, you will be able to hang up by 
pressing the * key on your phone ...

If C's phone does not answer, pressing * should return you to talking to A.

You can change the '*' button by changing the 'disconnect' line in 
features.conf.

Be sure to STOP NOW and restart asterisk when changing features.conf - a 
'reload' is /not/ enough.

Cheers,
Gavin.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura 2000 behind NAT issue, Vonage is working

2005-06-01 Thread Michael George
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:06:55PM +0200, David Hajek wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm trying to configure Sipura 2000 (behind NAT) which connects to 
 Asterisk (public IP, no NAT) and having interesting results. When Sipura 
 is behind Linux/NAT firewall it works great and no special NAT settings 
 on Sipura are necessary. The issue I'm having is when Sipura is behind 
 Linksys broadband NAT router. Sipura gets registered with Asterisk just 
 fine, but I can't hear the other party (to be more precise I can hear 
 first two secs then nothing). So it must be the incoming RTP is blocked 
 on Linksys. Here I think STUN server enters the game and give some help?
 
 I have installed Vovida STUN server and point Sipura to use it. But no 
 luck, I still can't hear the other party. I've ended up with having 
 Linksys to forward all ports to my Sipura (DMZ host) which works.
 
 What is interesting is that when I'm using Vonage service (Cisco ATA) it 
 works just fine without touching the Linksys. How come they can get 
 through it?
 
 Any hints?

Do you have the NAT Enable and NAT keepalive set to Yes on the Sipura?

-- 
-M

There are 10 kinds of people in this world:
Those who can count in binary and those who cannot.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

2005-06-01 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 12:43, Giordano Grandis wrote:
 No...maybe i don't explain u well.

 After that B call C andC not answer (go in timeout), B hear first the
 beeperr and then, together A the busy tone. Now i can't re-take the call :|

I'm afraid I don't have any more suggestions to offer - anyone else?

Cheers,
Gavin.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


R: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

2005-06-01 Thread Giordano Grandis
Ok, thanks for all.
Just a thingh: how do u set DTMF on your phones ?

Giordano


-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Gavin Hamill
Inviato: mercoledì 1 giugno 2005 13.51
A: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Oggetto: Re: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

On Wednesday 01 June 2005 12:43, Giordano Grandis wrote:
 No...maybe i don't explain u well.

 After that B call C andC not answer (go in timeout), B hear first the 
 beeperr and then, together A the busy tone. Now i can't re-take the 
 call :|

I'm afraid I don't have any more suggestions to offer - anyone else?

Cheers,
Gavin.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] MOH Jittery Voice

2005-06-01 Thread usman

Hi All,
I am having trouble with MOH. I have downloaded the latest CVS head and 
when I try to call from PSTN side and play MOH on a queue then the voice 
breaks. However if I play the same file using Playback() application and 
listen to it through PSTN side then there is no problem. CVan somebody 
tell me how can i use Playbak or background application to be used as MOH 
player  I am waiting for any response.

Khan.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: R: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

2005-06-01 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 13:04, Giordano Grandis wrote:
 Ok, thanks for all.
 Just a thingh: how do u set DTMF on your phones ?

We have them set to RFC2833. 

I think I've noticed some cases where the remote party hears the tones, but 
it's not an issue that bothers me :)

Cheers,
Gavin.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura 2000 behind NAT issue, Vonage is working

2005-06-01 Thread David Hajek



I have installed Vovida STUN server and point Sipura to use it. But no 
luck, I still can't hear the other party. I've ended up with having 
Linksys to forward all ports to my Sipura (DMZ host) which works.


What is interesting is that when I'm using Vonage service (Cisco ATA) it 
works just fine without touching the Linksys. How come they can get 
through it?


Any hints?
   



Do you have the NAT Enable and NAT keepalive set to Yes on the Sipura?
 



Yes, I do. I have find out that Sipura works when I set it as DMZ host 
on the Linksys firewall. Why Vonage can work without any special settings?


-David
http://hajek.net/blog
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IVR Load

2005-06-01 Thread Mohamed A. Gombolaty


Dear All,
I was trying to enable call forwarding, following the steps of the link
on voip.org regarding this issue it doesn't work and the phone I am trying
to implement on is still ringing. below is my conf in extensions.conf and
the CLI output during the process.
My configuration is :
exten => _*5X.,1,DBput(CF/${CALLERIDNUM}=${EXTEN:2})
exten => _*5X.,2,Hangup
exten => *5,1,DBdel(CF/${CALLERIDNUM})
exten => *5,2,Hangup

[macro-stdexten]
;
; Standard extension macro (with call forwarding):
; ${ARG1} - Extension(we could have used ${MACRO_EXTEN} here as well
; ${ARG2} - Device(s) to ring
;
exten => s,1,DBget(temp=CF/${ARG1})
exten => s,2,Goto(${temp}|1)
exten => s,102,Goto(s|3)
exten => s,3,Dial(${ARG2},120)
exten => s,103,Goto(s|50)
exten => s,4,Voicemail(u${ARG1})
exten => s,5,Hangup
exten => s,104,Voicemail(b${ARG1}) ; busy
exten => s,105,Hangup
the output on the CLI during this process was:
*CLI>
 -- Executing DBdel("SIP/777-a77c", "CF/777") in
new stack
 -- DBdel: family=CF, key=777
Urgent handler
 -- Executing Hangup("SIP/777-a77c", "") in new stack
Urgent handler
 -- Executing DBput("SIP/777-ad46", "CF/777=888")
in new stack
 -- DBput: family=CF, key=777, value=888
Urgent handler
 -- Executing Hangup("SIP/777-ad46", "") in new stack
Urgent handler
*CLI>
*CLI>
 -- Executing Dial("SIP/999-8f50", "SIP/777|7|tr")
in new stack
 -- Called 777
Urgent handler
Urgent handler
 -- SIP/777-82e9 is ringing
Urgent handler
Any Idea what's wrong
--
Thx
MAG

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk x PROLIANT ML 150 G2 SATA

2005-06-01 Thread James Sizemore

Fedora core 3 supports SATA on that model.

listas iPfone wrote:

Hi All,

I´m tryingo to install asterisk in an PROLIANT ML 150 G2 SATA and can´t 
make it work because linux cant recognize the Hd (HP 160 mb).


No drivers for Centos ...Red Hat... i´t´s drivig me crazy..

Someone have a tip? if i make change it to SCSI i think it will work but 
not sure about.


Thanks

Miklos
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] gnugk

2005-06-01 Thread Micko
HI,

I would like to know how can I check if gateway is registered with gnugk?

Thank you,

Mitja
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] UPS rating for SOHO asterisk box

2005-06-01 Thread Daryl G. Jurbala
 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
 Terry H. Gilsenan
 Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 5:05 AM
 To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
 Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] UPS rating for SOHO asterisk box
 
 
 I have many sites that have a 35amp Charger with 2 x 400ah 
 900CCA deep cycle batteries (10 year warranty), and 1000VA inverters.
 
 The combination makes for perfect power and about 2.5 days 
 run time with my network kit whish consists of several Dlink 
 wifi access points, 1 xbox (hacked into a router/firewall) 
 and a vsat system.
 
 Total cost for the power kit AUD$1400 all up, and not a 
 single second of downtime in over a year.
[...]

Yepyou can (somewhat) build your own UPS with peoperly rated
equipment.  As a matter of fact, most telco installations don't have
monolithic UPS's (like you'll see in most larger datacentersyou
know..the big box that says Liebert on it), they use racks of batteries
with separate charging circuits.  Most of the equipment runs directly
off of the battery voltage, but you will find places with some inverters
as well.  Of course, the room is properly designed (spaced,
non-combustible racks, fire detection and supression systems, etc.) and,
in most jurisdictions they also have to carry one or more operational
permits (current Internation Fire Code requires permitting for stationar
lead-acid battery systems exceeding 50 gallons liquid capacity). 

 On the flipside, I have seen a ups flare when the transformer 
 overheated and melted the varnish, nasty!

I've seen completely unmodified (although not properly maintained) UPSes
as large as 5000 Va completely melt down to the point where they
destroyed their own chassis, damaged the rack they were sitting in, and
activated the clean-agent supression system in the rooms they were in.
This was actually a big problem with one of my customersthey hadn't
been maintaining their UPSesthe replace battery lights had been
lit for months (they had all been purchased at about the same time).
Within a span of about 3 months, 4 of them melted down similarly.  A
quick call to APC revealed that the batteries in these units were rated
for about 12 monts less than they had actually been in service, and a
simple battery replacement would have prevented the problem (the chassis
was rated for something like 3 sets of batteries...whatever the lifespan
of the batteries was3 years I believe).

So, don't do stupid things with high voltage, like modifying equipment
that wasn't meant to be modified, using undersized equipment, failing to
properly vent batteries, or storing your contraption on or near
combustibles.  It's just NOT worth the risk.  Take it from someone who's
pulled his share of bodies (of both the live and dead varities) out of
buildings.  I've seen way too many fires started by electrical system or
device modifications similar to those described in previous posts.
And most people who do things like this just never consider the life
safety risk involved until its way too late.

I'll get off my soap-box now and get back on topic.

Daryl
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] gnugk

2005-06-01 Thread Peter Valkov
telnet your-gnugk-ip 7000
use AllRgistrations command or limply ? or ?? for 
PrintAllRegistrationsVerbose

Of course you have to configure your gnugk to allow you to use telnet on port 
7000 ... but i think
you can use it by default

--- Micko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 HI,
 
 I would like to know how can I check if gateway is registered with gnugk?
 
 Thank you,
 
 Mitja
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 




__ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Sipura 2000 behind NAT issue, Vonage is working

2005-06-01 Thread Rich Adamson
 I have installed Vovida STUN server and point Sipura to use it. But no 
 luck, I still can't hear the other party. I've ended up with having 
 Linksys to forward all ports to my Sipura (DMZ host) which works.
 
 What is interesting is that when I'm using Vonage service (Cisco ATA) it 
 works just fine without touching the Linksys. How come they can get 
 through it?
 
 Any hints?
 
 
 
 Do you have the NAT Enable and NAT keepalive set to Yes on the Sipura?
   
 
 
 Yes, I do. I have find out that Sipura works when I set it as DMZ host 
 on the Linksys firewall. Why Vonage can work without any special settings?

I fired up a spa3000 behind a linksys wireless firewall (befw11s4 v2)
and it works just fine with nat=yes and canreinvite=no in sip.conf.
Registration functions fine, no timeouts after days of operation,
and 2-way audio functions correctly regardless of where a call
originates.

* sip debug _should_ provide the clues needed to resolve the issue.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


R: R: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

2005-06-01 Thread Giordano Grandis
This is what happen when i call a peer that not answer:

   -- Executing Dial(SIP/401-4de6, SIP/402|60|Thtr) in new stack
-- Called 402
-- SIP/402-fa23 is ringing
-- SIP/402-fa23 answered SIP/401-4de6
-- Attempting native bridge of SIP/401-4de6 and SIP/402-fa23
-- Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/401-4de6
-- Playing 'pbx-transfer' (language 'it')
-- Executing Dial(Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED],2, SIP/406|60|Tthr) in new 
stack
-- Called 406
-- SIP/406-aa46 is ringing
Warning, flexibel rate not heavily tested!
Jun  1 13:45:57 WARNING[25325]: res_features.c:858 builtin_atxfer: Unable to 
create channel Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/n do you have chan_local?
-- Stopped music on hold on SIP/401-4de6
  == Spawn extension (local, 406, 1) exited non-zero on 'Local/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED],2'
-- Playing 'beeperr' (language 'it')
  == Spawn extension (local, 402, 1) exited non-zero on 'SIP/401-4de6'

It could some extensions.conf problem ?

Thanks 

-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Gavin Hamill
Inviato: mercoledì 1 giugno 2005 14.20
A: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Oggetto: Re: R: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

On Wednesday 01 June 2005 13:04, Giordano Grandis wrote:
 Ok, thanks for all.
 Just a thingh: how do u set DTMF on your phones ?

We have them set to RFC2833. 

I think I've noticed some cases where the remote party hears the tones, but 
it's not an issue that bothers me :)

Cheers,
Gavin.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Dynamic IAX Server

2005-06-01 Thread Wiley Siler
You just need to read up on IAX a little.  IAX has no trouble with
firewalling.  

As long as the client registers to the IAX server, the path will be
defined and connectivity will occur.
It may look like an odd port if you don't have a static port forward in
place but it will work.
If you really want the mechanics of how then google up IAX.

There is nothing special in iax.conf or extensions.conf.  Just use the
example given for a logical dialplan and all should work fine.

Cheers,
Wiley
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of chawki
hammoud
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 12:49 AM
To: Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Dynamic IAX Server 

Hi:

I read many documents and I posted my question several times here
without luck. I hope someone can help now please. Here is an example to
demonstarte my problem:

Suppose you manage the FWD server, how do you define an IAX client
behind nat so he can receive calls from FWD.

NAT client would register with FWD to let it know how to locate it. I
just don't see how FWD finds the nat client. How is that translated in
terms of IAX.conf contexts and what FWD dial in extensions.conf file.

Regards;
Chawki



__
Discover Yahoo! 
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] MOH Jittery Voice

2005-06-01 Thread Wiley Siler
Are you using custom music files?  If so, how did you transfer them to
the box?
If you transferred via FTP, you need to be sure you set the tranfer type
to Binary before sending.
Tranferring using ASCII has always hosed mp3 files for me on the * box.
The net result being similar to your description.

Are you using the MOH definition that has normal volume?

Thanks,
Wiley
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 7:52 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] MOH Jittery Voice


Hi All,
I am having trouble with MOH. I have downloaded the latest CVS head and
when I try to call from PSTN side and play MOH on a queue then the voice
breaks. However if I play the same file using Playback() application and
listen to it through PSTN side then there is no problem. CVan somebody
tell me how can i use Playbak or background application to be used as
MOH player  I am waiting for any response.

Khan.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: R: R: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

2005-06-01 Thread Gavin Hamill
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 14:15, Giordano Grandis wrote:
 This is what happen when i call a peer that not answer:

 Jun  1 13:45:57 WARNING[25325]: res_features.c:858 builtin_atxfer: Unable
 to create channel Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/n do you have chan_local? 

I don't like the look of this part at all. Please try to 
rm /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/* then 'make clean; make install' on a fresh 
checkout of CVS HEAD :)

Also, there should be no need for the 'r' option to Dial since SIP already 
supports all the progress indication necessary.

gdh
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] FW: TellMe pay-as-you-go? - UPDATE

2005-06-01 Thread Dean Collins








As some of you know Ive been trying
to facilitate an involvement with www.tellme.com
speech recognition tools and Asterisk. See www.studio.tellme.com 



There have been a number of people who are
already integrating the two and utilizing Tellme as an ASP to deliver speech
recognition to their asterisk applications.



However I do need to update the asterisk
list that it isnt proceeding as fast I would have originally hoped. My
original intention was to have Tellme set up a website where anyone with a
credit card could log in and purchase blocks of time in advance.



Unfortunately Tellme have decided that
they are only interested in taking commercial customers at this time (though have
indicated that from Jan they would be in a position to relook at this
situation). Below is an email between myself and Bryan which gives you an idea
on what we were looking to develop.



Its a great opportunity for
commercial high volume applications to deliver speech without the outlay (if
you are one of these contact me for details on the trials) however I cant say Im
not disappointed in their decision not to offer this as a prepaid service
similar to how the asterisk community is being serviced by the sms ASPs.



If anyone has some alternative suggestions
Im open to hearing it



Cheers,

Dean















From: Bryan A.
Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 25 May 2005 2:16
PM
To: Dean Collins
Subject: Re: TellMe pay-as-you-go?





Yeah, I understand. It'd have to land into the community support world,
just as asterisk has for small-time users.

I'd imagine that folks like
yourself, and open-source developers who just think it'd
be neat to have certain home apps would do the support/feeding of the little
guys. TellMe would just need to provide a utility service.

Anyway, assuming that TellMe would be willing to SIP redirect (ie, I write my
app to redirect a caller to TellMe for the voice rec, but when I complete the
call somewhere, I pull TellMe out of the loop, so I'm
not paying them for termination. If that's
the case, then probably something like $0.10-$0.15/minute is reasonable.
Perhaps $0.20-$0.30 if billing were in fractional minutes (ie, 6 sec increments
like the industry does for long distance). I dunno, I'm
just making this up probably a monthly maintainence would also be ok. I'd like to see that be $5/mo, unless it's just a minimum charge, rather than a flat fee.
Or, an entirely other direction is to just charge $5/mo for some big
pseudo-unmetered-until-it's-abused
usage. That would cover most home users, who'd
probably only generate a couple of dozen minutes a month, but also make the
billing system (and, correlated, number of disputes) a lot simpler to deal
with.

I'm a techie, though, not a business
man, so I'm just guessing at what I
and others doing similar things would find reasonable. I have a pay-as-you-go
toll free number, a couple of free DIDs in different area codes, and a
$0.013/minute long distance termination company that bills in 6s increments. If
folks who tinker on the horizon I do are going to use these kinds of services,
they need to be cheap.



On 5/24/05, Dean
Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:



Hey I totally agree with you about scaling down. One of my
biggest arguments with a previous client was around this exact idea.

Unfortunately I think the average personal user would want
programming support for when things go wrong, what would you do in that
situation? I don't think you could
charge them $100 for the service call on an app they only pay $10 a month for?

I agree with what you are saying, I've
flicked the Tellme team an email about your idea, may they might take your app
on as a trial.


 If they were to take it on it
 would be on the understanding that it may be cancelled at any time.
 That it would not involve
 support from their end.
 That it would a fully paid in
 advance basis in the initial trial.


How much a minute per cycle do you think this is worth to
you?

Regards,

Dean Collins

Cognation Pty Ltd

[EMAIL PROTECTED]


+1-212-203-4357

+61-2-8307-3503 (Sydney in-dial)













From: Bryan A. Pendleton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2005 6:13 PM




To: Dean Collins
Subject: Re: TellMe
pay-as-you-go?











Well, for changes to the wiki, you might mention that
the service is not likely to be for personal use. It's
not totally clear from the entry.

Also, I disagree. There's absolutely
no reason that VXML hosting couldn't
be scaled to providing individual users low-volume service. It's merely a matter of having a sufficient pool of
resources, and removing all of the management cost-per-user, or making it very
very small and mostly the burden of the user. In principle, this is exactly
what VoIP termination companies like voipjet.com and voicepulse.com do, or, conversely, super-large-scale web
hosting companies, only the resource being dolled out is more expensive. You've gotta'
provide CPU cycles on 

[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Google API applications - $4500 bounties available

2005-06-01 Thread Dean Collins








In conjunction with my last post on Tellme I want to write another
suggestion for an application I had.



I dont know if you guys have come across Google Gas http://www.ahding.com/cheapgas 



But basically it is an application that this guy has developed
using the Google API to search an online database on gas prices in your area. 



One of my strong beliefs about how Asterisk is going to leave
the Commercial IP-PBX vendors behind is by leveraging the open
source community to write voice driven applications for Asterisk. The weather
app written for [EMAIL PROTECTED] is great example. (http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=3004652
the WAF on this was worth setting up asterisk alone, she checks this every
morning for NY weather).



I was also hoping that the www.tellme.com
and www.studio.tellme.com tools
would also stimulate this area. People should also check out www.angel.com for other ideas on best of breed
speech applications.



The suggestion I would like to make is that someone use the Google
api to write code for a directions application.



You could use Tellme to deliver the current address and the
destination address into the Google API and then use text to speech to read
back the directions. With enough finessing this could compete with any of the
current commercial direction solutions that are out there and because its
asterisk your cost base could be extremely minimal.



Hell you might even get paid for it http://code.google.com/summerofcode.html





Just a suggestion, any thoughts? Are there any other speech
driven apps being used today?



Cheers,

Dean










___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP Soft Video phone for Asterisk usage

2005-06-01 Thread Nardis Dome


--- Ronald Wiplinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Nardis Dome wrote:
 
 in your sip.conf: 
 
 [general] 
 videosupport=yes ;
   
 
 That helped a lot
 
 in your eyeBeam settings- try to enable all the
 h.263
 codec.
 
 hope it helps..
   
 
 However, I am still not there.
 I have installed eyeBeam on 612 and 617. While 612
 gets the video of 
 617, 617 sees 612 as a picture, like a big
 spreadsheet with dots in each 
 cell. Absolutely no picture to recognize.
 612 sees itself clear.
 
 What could be still wrong?
 
 I have enabled all codecs on both Xten.
 In asterisk it has the same settings (realtime shows
 the same record - 
 of course user and password is different)
 
 
Sometimes i have the same probleme. I have to restart
eyeBeam or reboot my PC...






__ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] pbx - fiber - network media converter - wifi - network media converter - fiber - pbx ???

2005-06-01 Thread Ben Dugdale
Thanks for your reply.

I wouldn't expect more than half a dozen concurrent calls.  Also, we can do the
bridge with proxims if needed (not the model with a telco t1 broken out).

The reason I ask about the media converters is to save the trouble having to
interface an * box to each Definity.

Rich Adamson wrote:
Please forgive the (almost?) OT post.  (and the fact that I need a clue-bat)

We've got a situation at one of our sites where a construction crew is
likely to dig up our conduit which houses some data fiber and one pair
of fiber used to tie a Definity 3gsi at a small office building to the
rest of the phone system (school district).  We're using a pair of
Aeronets to the data network stays up, but haven't decided how to keep
the phone system up yet.

I wonder if it is possible to bridge what I guess it a telco t1 via
fiber over wireless using standard media converters like we use for data
networks?  We're able to dedicate a set of radios to this if needed.

Anyone ever tried this or know the basics well enough to know that it
(will|will not) work?

Any thoughts on how a guy might use * to save the day without having to
hack the Definity or get fiber in and out of a * box on each end?
 
 
 Yes, you can use wireless to accomplish this. However, the aeronet won't
 be able to accomplish this without something to convert the datastream
 into IP-based dataflows (eg, two asterisk boxes with iax between).
 
 There are wireless boxes that will operate at 70 megabits/sec and will
 accept T1 interfaces, but those typically are in the $15k - $20k range.
 
 If you can estimate the true number of simultanous calls expected across
 the facility, using an asterisk box at both ends (each with a T1 card
 interfacing to the respective phone equipment) might work across the
 aeronets. If you really had 24 simultanous conversations going on, the
 likelihood of the aeronets providing acceptable service will be very
 low. The exact number of simultanous conversations will be 100% dependent
 on the codec used between the asterisk boxes, the quality of the signal
 between the aeronets, and the stability (including jitter) of the end-
 to-end wireless link.
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 [Scanned for viruses]
 
 [Scanned for viruses]
 
 

-- 
Ben Dugdale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator
Apache County Schools Business Consortium www.acsbc.net
Apache County Arizona www.co.apache.az.us
Work (928) 337-7507
Cell (928) 245-2754
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] pbx - fiber - network media converter - wifi - network media converter - fiber - pbx ???

2005-06-01 Thread Ben Dugdale
Thanks for the reply.

I'll get up there today and get more details on the Definity.

Alexander Lopez wrote:
  We use Wireless b/w two office in Miami We are using the Proxim stuff
 and it is solid.  Two Asterisk servers doing Iax b/w them should (will)
 work fine.  What is the interface into the 3gsi?? Do you have a card
 part number to post, that would help in determining what you need to do.
 
 Alex
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben
 Dugdale
 Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:52 PM
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] pbx - fiber - network media converter -
 wifi - network media converter - fiber - pbx ???
 
 Please forgive the (almost?) OT post.  (and the fact that I need a
 clue-bat)
 
 We've got a situation at one of our sites where a construction crew is
 likely to dig up our conduit which houses some data fiber and one pair
 of fiber used to tie a Definity 3gsi at a small office building to the
 rest of the phone system (school district).  We're using a pair of
 Aeronets to the data network stays up, but haven't decided how to keep
 the phone system up yet.
 
 I wonder if it is possible to bridge what I guess it a telco t1 via
 fiber over wireless using standard media converters like we use for data
 networks?  We're able to dedicate a set of radios to this if needed.
 
 Anyone ever tried this or know the basics well enough to know that it
 (will|will not) work?
 
 Any thoughts on how a guy might use * to save the day without having to
 hack the Definity or get fiber in and out of a * box on each end?
 
 Thanks!!
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Setting up a TDM

2005-06-01 Thread Hugo Barra
Greetings to all!

I have been writing a great new voice messaging application on Asterisk, and
am getting to the point of moving it to my own hosting environment.  I have
been in discussions with service providers who can provide me with a TDM
voice T1 line (analog?), but cannot provide a SIP-terminated line.  

My question is: what do I need to hook that TDM T1 line into the server
where I'm running Asterisk?  Is it simply a Digium card like the Wildcard
TE410P?

Many thanks!

Hugo


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Large installation with Asterisk

2005-06-01 Thread richard Coco

Hi all,

i am looking for informations about large installation
with Asterisk (~3000 users). Has anybody experience
with such a setup. Any comments, suggestions or
problems would be appreciated.

thx in advance...



__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Adam Vocks








In an order to save money, I would like to use a PRI that we
have going to one of our dial-up modem banks (We are an ISP.) During
business hours these channels are idle and during our peak internet times, we
are closed. Sounds too good to be true, but I thought I would throw it
out there. These are modem calls that if they would call our modem bank
number, they would be bridged to the outbound zap channels??? And of
course, if they dial our business number we would send them to the appropriate
sip channels. I didnt know if this could be done with two T1 cards
and asterisk



Here is a primitive sketch.



If anyone has information, please share.



Thank You



Adam Vocks

CTI








___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] [q] About chan_misdn, latest mISDNuser and asterisk cvs

2005-06-01 Thread Rus V. Brushkoff

Hi.

 Where I can get chan_misdn that compiles with latest asterisk and
mISDNuser cvs ? Or may be chan_misdn is already present in some asterisk
cvs branch ?

TIA

Rus
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Alexander Lopez



This may or may not work due to timings slips that you 
may experiance with the Digium Cards. Your are correct in assuming this 
scenaro.

I did the same (pre-asterisk) with an Adtran 
Atlas. It is rock solid and works great. What modem access bank are 
you using, there has been some talk about using the PM3 as an IAX gateway. 
(highly vaporware at this point), The Acend unit support SIP, the Cisco 
suport..., etc. etc,




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam 
VocksSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 11:07 AMTo: Asterisk 
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: 
[Asterisk-Users] Pass-through


In an order to save money, I would 
like to use a PRI that we have going to one of our dial-up modem banks (We are 
an ISP.) During business hours these channels are idle and during our peak 
internet times, we are closed. Sounds too good to be true, but I thought I 
would throw it out there. These are modem calls that if they would call 
our modem bank number, they would be bridged to the outbound zap 
channels??? And of course, if they dial our business number we would send 
them to the appropriate sip channels. I didnt know if this could be done 
with two T1 cards and asterisk

Here is a primitive 
sketch.

If anyone has information, please 
share.

Thank 
You

Adam 
Vocks
CTI

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Dustin Wildes

Adam Vocks wrote:

In an order to save money, I would like to use a PRI that we have 
going to one of our dial-up modem banks (We are an ISP.) During 
business hours these channels are idle and during our peak internet 
times, we are closed. Sounds too good to be true, but I thought I 
would throw it out there. These are modem calls that if they would 
call our modem bank number, they would be bridged to the outbound zap 
channels??? And of course, if they dial our business number we would 
send them to the appropriate sip channels. I didnt know if this could 
be done with two T1 cards and asterisk


Here is a primitive sketch.


If anyone has information, please share.

Thank You

Adam Vocks

CTI





I've done the exact same thing.
We had a 23-channel PRI that a client was using for voice, but had a 
small IVR for their banking application that had direct analog lines 
pointed to it.
I ordered an Adtran Total Access 750 and an additional T1 (T100P) card. 
The TA750 had 24 analog lines, with one T1 interface.
The asterisk server had 2 T100Ps one card was for the PRI, the second 
was a cross-over to the Adtran 750. Works great, don't see why it 
wouldn't work for you in the same method you are talking about for a 
modem pool.


Drawing:


inline: astModem.jpg___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Adam Vocks








Were still using Lucent PM3s



Adam











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Alexander Lopez
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005
10:24 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
Pass-through





This may or may not work due to timings
slips that you may experiance with the Digium Cards. Your are correct in
assuming this scenaro.



I did the same (pre-asterisk) with an
Adtran Atlas. It is rock solid and works great. What modem access
bank are you using, there has been some talk about using the PM3 as an IAX
gateway. (highly vaporware at this point), The Acend unit support SIP, the
Cisco suport..., etc. etc,













From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Adam Vocks
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005
11:07 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
Pass-through

In an order to save money, I would like to use a PRI that we
have going to one of our dial-up modem banks (We are an ISP.) During
business hours these channels are idle and during our peak internet times, we
are closed. Sounds too good to be true, but I thought I would throw it
out there. These are modem calls that if they would call our modem bank
number, they would be bridged to the outbound zap channels??? And of
course, if they dial our business number we would send them to the appropriate
sip channels. I didnt know if this could be done with two T1 cards
and asterisk



Here is a primitive sketch.



If anyone has information, please share.



Thank You



Adam Vocks

CTI








___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Dave Weis


On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Dustin Wildes wrote:

Adam Vocks wrote:
 In an order to save money, I would like to use a PRI that we have 
 going to one of our dial-up modem banks (We are an ISP.) During 
 business hours these channels are idle and during our peak internet 
 times, we are closed. Sounds too good to be true, but I thought I 
 would throw it out there. These are modem calls that if they would 
 call our modem bank number, they would be bridged to the outbound zap 
 channels??? And of course, if they dial our business number we would 
 send them to the appropriate sip channels. I didn?t know if this could 
 be done with two T1 cards and asterisk?

I've done the exact same thing.
We had a 23-channel PRI that a client was using for voice, but had a 
small IVR for their banking application that had direct analog lines 
pointed to it.
I ordered an Adtran Total Access 750 and an additional T1 (T100P) card. 
The TA750 had 24 analog lines, with one T1 interface.
The asterisk server had 2 T100Ps one card was for the PRI, the second 
was a cross-over to the Adtran 750. Works great, don't see why it 
wouldn't work for you in the same method you are talking about for a 
modem pool.


There is a better device if you have a PRI, an Adtran Atlas 550 is 
basically a full phone switch. You can put an entire dialplan on it to do 
router based on DID/DNIS. It will also do channelized T1 to PRI conversion 
each way. Very slick boxes, I'm about to set one up for another asterisk 
user to split 1 PRI to 12 pots lines for an older switch, 1 PRI for 
Asterisk, 1 channelized T1 for a modem bank, and some FXO ports for an 
older Brooktrout card. If anyone wants more info on them let me know.


--
Dave Weis I believe there are more instances of the abridgment
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent
  encroachments of those in power than by violent
  and sudden usurpations.- James Madison
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


R: R: R: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

2005-06-01 Thread Giordano Grandis
I did it...but with no good results.
Could i see a example of peer in extensions.conf ? 
I'm trying everythinghs but i always have differenta results :|

Thanks
giordano
 

-Messaggio originale-
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Per conto di Gavin Hamill
Inviato: mercoledì 1 giugno 2005 15.31
A: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Oggetto: Re: R: R: [Asterisk-Users] AT-320 + supervised transfer

On Wednesday 01 June 2005 14:15, Giordano Grandis wrote:
 This is what happen when i call a peer that not answer:

 Jun  1 13:45:57 WARNING[25325]: res_features.c:858 builtin_atxfer: 
 Unable to create channel Local/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/n do you have chan_local?

I don't like the look of this part at all. Please try to rm 
/usr/lib/asterisk/modules/* then 'make clean; make install' on a fresh 
checkout of CVS HEAD :)

Also, there should be no need for the 'r' option to Dial since SIP already 
supports all the progress indication necessary.

gdh
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Segmentation Fautl / Core Dump with G.729

2005-06-01 Thread Jorge Alayon

Hello, 

Has anyone experienced a segmentation fault in asterisk for using G729
against an AS5300 in SIP ? 
I'm having this problem. Also, any other codec I use gives me incompatible
media (can be read in SIP DEBUG messages). 
AS5300 configured for multiple codecs, so is Asterisk. 
Tried G711u/A G723 and G.729. Any clues ?

Regards,

Jorge A.

Info: 

Asterisk ver 1.0.7 stable
Using AMPortal 1.0.0.8

SIP.CONF

---
; Note: If your SIP devices are behind a NAT and your Asterisk
;  server isn't, try adding nat=1 to each peer definition to
;  solve translation problems.

[general]

port = 5060   ; Port to bind to (SIP is 5060)
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0; Address to bind to (all addresses on machine)
disallow=all
allow=alaw
allow=g729
allow=g723
context = from-sip-external ; Send unknown SIP callers to this context
callerid = Unknown
language=es
#include sip_nat.conf
#include sip_custom.conf
#include sip_additional.conf

---

SIP_ADDITIONAL.CONF

---
[as5300]
type=peer
qualify=yes
host=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (AS5300 box)


---

AS5300 relevant Config

---
...
!
voice class codec 1010
 codec preference 1 g711alaw
 codec preference 2 g711ulaw
 codec preference 3 g723ar63
 codec preference 4 g723r63
!
...
!
dial-peer voice 1010 voip
 destination-pattern 85..
 progress_ind setup enable 3
 progress_ind progress enable 8
 voice-class codec 1010
 session protocol sipv2
 session target ipv4:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (ASterisk Box)
 dtmf-relay cisco-rtp rtp-nte h245-signal h245-alphanumeric
!

---
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Adam Vocks








Would something as simple as this work?



[InFromZap1] ;Context
for incoming telco calls

exten = 1234567890, 1, Dial(Zap/g2) ;g2
would be the second digium card connected to our Lucent PM3 with a crossover
cable.



Thanks



Adam









From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Vocks
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005
10:24 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
Pass-through





Were still using Lucent PM3s



Adam











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander Lopez
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005
10:24 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
Pass-through





This may or may not work due to timings
slips that you may experiance with the Digium Cards. Your are correct in
assuming this scenaro.



I did the same (pre-asterisk) with an
Adtran Atlas. It is rock solid and works great. What modem access
bank are you using, there has been some talk about using the PM3 as an IAX
gateway. (highly vaporware at this point), The Acend unit support SIP, the
Cisco suport..., etc. etc,













From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Vocks
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005
11:07 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users]
Pass-through

In an order to save money, I would like to use a PRI that we
have going to one of our dial-up modem banks (We are an ISP.) During
business hours these channels are idle and during our peak internet times, we
are closed. Sounds too good to be true, but I thought I would throw it
out there. These are modem calls that if they would call our modem bank
number, they would be bridged to the outbound zap channels??? And of
course, if they dial our business number we would send them to the appropriate
sip channels. I didnt know if this could be done with two T1 cards
and asterisk



Here is a primitive sketch.



If anyone has information, please share.



Thank You



Adam Vocks

CTI








___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] ARESKICC - Another issue

2005-06-01 Thread robson








Hi all,



After finally making the web interface for AreskiCC work I am now running into new issues. 



1  In Asterisk the manager doesnt seem to
connect

2  When I try to create the file
additional_areskicc_sip.conf it says Could not open buddy file
/etc/asterisk/additional_areskicc_sip.conf



Any clues?










___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Last of the servers forsale cheap

2005-06-01 Thread Preston Garrison
Ok guys, due to someone recently backing out I have a couple more 
servers left.  These are tested, all freshly installed freebsd, double 
boxed and ready to ship.  I need to get these shipped out by tommorow 
before I got out of town, so I need to k now today if anyone wants 
them.  Make an offer on them if interested, I just want to get rid of 
them..



1u Dual P3 800mhz  512megs memory, 2 x 9gb scsi U160 drives.
Dual ethernet,  Supermicro server, v ery nice.   CDROM, FLoppy, etc
$400


1u Dual P3 933mhz  1gb memory, 2 x 40gb IDE drives Dual Ethernet 
$400


1u 1.2ghz AMD servers, 512megs memory, 2 x 60gig hard drive
$350


2u p4 2ghz 60gig drive, 512megs memory, CDROM   
 $400





Make me an offer if these prices seem too high, would like to get rid 
of them before tommorow.. let me know..




Preston Garrison
direct: 877-748-4142
fax: 310-774-3901
cell: 623-748-4140
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] rxfax problems - cont.

2005-06-01 Thread Marcin Kuczera
Well, my faxes passes through asterisk successfully, however I still have 
some problems about fax reception by rxfax.


The softfax answers, and negotiates transmission, however then as some stage 
of communiation something is wrong.

But I have nothing more but this log:

Jun  2 00:10:21 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:4242 zt_read: DTMF digit: * on 
Zap/10-1
Jun  2 00:10:22 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:4242 zt_read: DTMF digit: 1 on 
Zap/10-1
Jun  2 00:10:22 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:4242 zt_read: DTMF digit: 0 on 
Zap/10-1
Jun  2 00:10:22 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:4242 zt_read: DTMF digit: 7 on 
Zap/10-1
Jun  2 00:10:23 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:4242 zt_read: DTMF digit: 8 on 
Zap/10-1
Jun  2 00:10:23 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:1384 zt_enable_ec: No 
echocancellation requested

   -- Executing SetVar(Zap/10-1, CALLEDFAX=*1078) in new stack
   -- Executing Answer(Zap/10-1, ) in new stack
Jun  2 00:10:23 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:2484 zt_answer: Took Zap/10-1 off 
hook

   -- Executing Goto(Zap/10-1, fax|*1078|1) in new stack
   -- Goto (fax,*1078,1)
   -- Executing Macro(Zap/10-1, faxreceive) in new stack
   -- Executing SetVar(Zap/10-1, 
FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/*1078/asterisk-419-1117663820.32) in new 
stack
   -- Executing RxFAX(Zap/10-1, 
/var/spool/asterisk/fax/*1078/asterisk-419-1117663820.32.tif) in new stack
Jun  2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:80 phase_e_handler: 
==
Jun  2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:81 phase_e_handler: Fax 
successfully received.
Jun  2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:82 phase_e_handler: Remote station 
id:
Jun  2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:83 phase_e_handler: Local station 
id:
Jun  2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:84 phase_e_handler: Pages 
transferred: 0
Jun  2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:85 phase_e_handler: Image 
resolution:  0 x 0
Jun  2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:86 phase_e_handler: Transfer Rate: 
9600
Jun  2 00:10:37 DEBUG[16900]: app_rxfax.c:87 phase_e_handler: 
==
Jun  2 00:10:41 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:3974 __zt_exception: Exception on 
28, channel 10
Jun  2 00:10:41 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:3286 zt_handle_event: Got event On 
hook(1) on channel 10 (index 0)
   -- Executing System(Zap/10-1, /var/lib/asterisk/scripts/mailfax 
*1076 *1078   
/var/spool/asterisk/fax/*1078/asterisk-419-1117663820.32 ) in new stack
Jun  2 00:10:41 WARNING[16900]: app_system.c:70 system_exec_helper: Unable 
to execute '/var/lib/asterisk/scripts/mailfax *1076 *1078   
/var/spool/asterisk/fax/*1078/asterisk-419-1117663820.32 '
Jun  2 00:10:41 WARNING[16900]: app_system.c:70 system_exec_helper: Unable 
to execute '/var/lib/asterisk/scripts/mailfax *1076 *1078   
/var/spool/asterisk/fax/*1078/asterisk-419-1117663820.32 '

 == Spawn extension (fax, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/10-1'
Jun  2 00:10:41 DEBUG[445]: rate_engine.c:708 poster_worker: Rating Engine 
poster thread processing
Jun  2 00:10:41 DEBUG[445]: rate_engine.c:770 poster_worker: Attempting to 
write queue entry to database
Jun  2 00:10:41 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:2164 zt_hangup: Hangup: channel: 10 
index = 0, normal = 28, callwait = -1, thirdcall = -1
Jun  2 00:10:41 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:2577 zt_setoption: Set option TDD 
MODE, value: OFF(0) on Zap/10-1
Jun  2 00:10:41 DEBUG[16900]: chan_zap.c:1352 update_conf: Updated 
conferencing on 10, with 0 conference users

   -- Hungup 'Zap/10-1'

Asterisk 1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC7k
libspandsp-dev 0.0.2pre17-1
libspandsp00.0.2pre17-1
txfax/rxfax from spandsp-0.0.2pre18

Physical test fax is Panasonic KX-FT908PD connected to TDM400P FXS port

I also tried incomming fax through BRI interface - the same result, error 
code 41 (on Panasonic)



Maybe someone meet this problem ?

Regards
Marcin 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoiPSupply Dot Com

2005-06-01 Thread Robert Goodyear


On May 31, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Karl J. Vesterling wrote:



 Garrett, evidently there is some verbage to that effect on the site.  
But just to let you know, no other business that we've done business 
with requires anything like that.  Not a one. 


 Also worthy of note is that the purchase was not a credit card order, 
so I'm rather surprised your terms regarding credit cards would apply.


 In retrospect, I guess I should have spent the 16 hours browsing your 
site looking for the fine print instead of waiting for a prompt 
shipment.


 But, alas...  We found someone that knows how to do business with 
businesses.


Since you're compelled to send us evidence of your other business 
dealings, why don't you send the list some pictures of yourself with 
some completely unimportant politicians to further validate your sense 
of self-righteousness?


Listen: you obviously have no understanding of merchant accounts nor 
business risk management in general, so there's no amount of explaining 
a seller's right to uphold any and all terms in efforts of mitigating 
said risk. Go back to your workbench and sniff some solder fumes.


/rg
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] astapi memory errors?

2005-06-01 Thread Dean Collins








Im using outlook 2003 on windows xp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] v
0.8



Is anyone else having issues with Astapi?



About 50% of the time after I make a call and then terminate
it I have a memory 0X093 error.



Does anyone know what this is?





Cheers,

Dean








___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] DTMF not working

2005-06-01 Thread Aitor
Im trying to configure voicemail, but asterisk doesnt respond to dtmf codes.
I uses kphone with g711u codec (I've tryed the others one) and in sip.conf I 
configure dtmfmode=rfc2833 (I've tryied inband and info).
Asterisk seems not to see the tones. Could somebody help me? Thanks
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] HELP Cisco - can't find P0S3-07-4-00.sbn

2005-06-01 Thread Ing CIP Alejandro Celi =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mari=E1tegui?=

What I need to do?  Rename/Copy P003-07-4-00.bin to P0S3-07-4-00.sbn

Regards,

-- 
Ing CIP Alejandro Celi Mariátegui 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


El mar, 31-05-2005 a las 23:15, Andrew Latham escribió:
 sbn is a signed bin file
 
 P0S-xx-x-xx.sbn would be the format for the SIP image after version 5
 P0S-xx-x-xx.bin would be the format for the SIP image before version 5
 
 
 On 5/31/05, Ing CIP Alejandro Celi Mariátegui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  I have a problem, I'm working with firmware SIP 6.3 installed on my
  Cisco phone and works fine, and I have the 7.4 firmware version to
  upgrade:
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/alex/central/P0S3-07-4-00 ls -l
  total 2.3M
  -rw-r--r--1 root root 126K mar 10 15:33 P003-07-4-00.bin
  -rw-r--r--1 root root 578K mar 10 15:44 P0S3-07-4-00.bin
  -rw-r--r--1 root root  461 mar 10 16:01
  P0S3-07-4-00.loads
  -rw-r--r--1 root root 579K mar 10 15:45 P0S3-07-4-00.sb2
  -rw-r--r--1 root root 127K mar 10 15:33 P003-07-4-00.sbn
  -rw-r--r--1 root root   15 mar 10 15:33 OS79XX.TXT
  -rw-r--r--1 root root 895K abr 13 23:30 P0S3-07-4-00.zip
  
  When I try to upgrade to the 7.4 firmware I get this log:
  
  uploading OS79XX.TXT
  uploading P0S3-07-4-00.bin
  uploading P0S3-07-4-00.loads
  uploading P0S3-07-4-00.sb2
  can't find P0S3-07-4-00.sbn - Aborted
  
  My phone is asking for a P0S3-07-4-00.sbn file, and can't find it in the
  Cisco distro. Perhaps a Cisco bug?
  
  Any idea?
  
  Regards,
  
  --
  Ing CIP Alejandro Celi Mariátegui
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] list down?

2005-06-01 Thread Dean Collins








List doesnt seem to be posting out  still active
here http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-June/date.html
but not being received by email (time warner is the isp but other emails coming
in every few minutes as per normal).



Cheers,

Dean














___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Astcc does not work - no repeat metering

2005-06-01 Thread C W Nel
I have installed xorcom and [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2 different pc's,
with astcc.

It only registers the once of connection billing, and never again.

I have tried everything. Am I doing something wrong?

I will appreciate any help!






-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.3.3 - Release Date: 31/05/2005
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] HELP Cisco - can't find P0S3-07-4-00.sbn

2005-06-01 Thread Mailing List

OS79XX.TXT should contain:
P003-07-4-00


_
Mobilcom
http://www.mobilcom.net



- Original Message - 
From: Ing CIP Alejandro Celi Mariátegui [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 11:59 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] HELP Cisco - can't find P0S3-07-4-00.sbn




I have a problem, I'm working with firmware SIP 6.3 installed on my
Cisco phone and works fine, and I have the 7.4 firmware version to
upgrade:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]/home/alex/central/P0S3-07-4-00 ls -l
total 2.3M
-rw-r--r--1 root root 126K mar 10 15:33 P003-07-4-00.bin
-rw-r--r--1 root root 578K mar 10 15:44 P0S3-07-4-00.bin
-rw-r--r--1 root root  461 mar 10 16:01
P0S3-07-4-00.loads
-rw-r--r--1 root root 579K mar 10 15:45 P0S3-07-4-00.sb2
-rw-r--r--1 root root 127K mar 10 15:33 P003-07-4-00.sbn
-rw-r--r--1 root root   15 mar 10 15:33 OS79XX.TXT
-rw-r--r--1 root root 895K abr 13 23:30 P0S3-07-4-00.zip

When I try to upgrade to the 7.4 firmware I get this log:

   uploading OS79XX.TXT
   uploading P0S3-07-4-00.bin
   uploading P0S3-07-4-00.loads
   uploading P0S3-07-4-00.sb2
   can't find P0S3-07-4-00.sbn - Aborted

My phone is asking for a P0S3-07-4-00.sbn file, and can't find it in the
Cisco distro. Perhaps a Cisco bug?

Any idea?

Regards,

--
Ing CIP Alejandro Celi Mariátegui
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] pbx - fiber - network media converter - wifi - network media converter - fiber - pbx ???

2005-06-01 Thread Bill Ford
Check this out:

http://www.engagecom.com/Products/iptube_T1.htm

On 6/1/05, Rich Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Please forgive the (almost?) OT post.  (and the fact that I need a clue-bat)
 
  We've got a situation at one of our sites where a construction crew is
  likely to dig up our conduit which houses some data fiber and one pair
  of fiber used to tie a Definity 3gsi at a small office building to the
  rest of the phone system (school district).  We're using a pair of
  Aeronets to the data network stays up, but haven't decided how to keep
  the phone system up yet.
 
  I wonder if it is possible to bridge what I guess it a telco t1 via
  fiber over wireless using standard media converters like we use for data
  networks?  We're able to dedicate a set of radios to this if needed.
 
  Anyone ever tried this or know the basics well enough to know that it
  (will|will not) work?
 
  Any thoughts on how a guy might use * to save the day without having to
  hack the Definity or get fiber in and out of a * box on each end?
 
 Yes, you can use wireless to accomplish this. However, the aeronet won't
 be able to accomplish this without something to convert the datastream
 into IP-based dataflows (eg, two asterisk boxes with iax between).
 
 There are wireless boxes that will operate at 70 megabits/sec and will
 accept T1 interfaces, but those typically are in the $15k - $20k range.
 
 If you can estimate the true number of simultanous calls expected across
 the facility, using an asterisk box at both ends (each with a T1 card
 interfacing to the respective phone equipment) might work across the
 aeronets. If you really had 24 simultanous conversations going on, the
 likelihood of the aeronets providing acceptable service will be very
 low. The exact number of simultanous conversations will be 100% dependent
 on the codec used between the asterisk boxes, the quality of the signal
 between the aeronets, and the stability (including jitter) of the end-
 to-end wireless link.
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Suppress Missed Calls 7960 SIP

2005-06-01 Thread Robert Goodyear


On May 31, 2005, at 8:05 PM, Andy Hamilton wrote:



On 5/31/05, Robert Goodyear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Does anyone know how to suppress the Missed Calls indication --
perhaps on a per-line basis -- on the 7960 running SIP?

Reason: I've configured a group of extensions to ring for inbound 
calls

and it seems pointless to accrue missed calls on those line
presentations.

/rg

Rob:

Not sure how to (though I agree it would be handy). If anything, it
would be a Cisco thing. Have you checked their website to see if the
have any tips?

-Andy



Yeah, no such luck. I'm guessing it would require a Firmware hack, 
which is CERTAINLY out of my realm.


Which begs the question: I wonder if/when anyone will attempt to write 
FW for IP phones in the same vein as the openWRT / Sveasoft crowd.


/rg

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread Alexander Lopez



That should work but you need to have the asterisk box 
setup to do pri-net on the connection to the PM3. I would add the did dialed so 
that the PM3 knows about it for radius accounting..


exten = 1234567890, 
1, Dial(Zap/g2/${EXTEN})



From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam 
VocksSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 12:02 PMTo: Asterisk 
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: RE: 
[Asterisk-Users] Pass-through


Would something as 
simple as this work?

[InFromZap1] 
;Context for incoming telco calls
exten = 1234567890, 
1, Dial(Zap/g2) ;g2 would be the second digium card 
connected to our Lucent PM3 with a crossover cable.

Thanks

Adam




From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam VocksSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:24 
AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing 
List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] 
Pass-through

Were still using 
Lucent PM3s

Adam





From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexander LopezSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:24 
AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing 
List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] 
Pass-through

This may or may not 
work due to timings slips that you may experiance with the Digium Cards. 
Your are correct in assuming this scenaro.

I did the same 
(pre-asterisk) with an Adtran Atlas. It is rock solid and works 
great. What modem access bank are you using, there has been some talk 
about using the PM3 as an IAX gateway. (highly vaporware at this point), The 
Acend unit support SIP, the Cisco suport..., etc. 
etc,






From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam VocksSent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 11:07 
AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing 
List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: [Asterisk-Users] 
Pass-through
In an order to save money, I would 
like to use a PRI that we have going to one of our dial-up modem banks (We are 
an ISP.) During business hours these channels are idle and during our peak 
internet times, we are closed. Sounds too good to be true, but I thought I 
would throw it out there. These are modem calls that if they would call 
our modem bank number, they would be bridged to the outbound zap 
channels??? And of course, if they dial our business number we would send 
them to the appropriate sip channels. I didnt know if this could be done 
with two T1 cards and asterisk

Here is a primitive 
sketch.

If anyone has information, please 
share.

Thank 
You

Adam 
Vocks
CTI

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Unreliable DTMF detection with DISA on incomingZap channel on bristuffed * and GSM gateway

2005-06-01 Thread Marcelo Sosa Lugones
Hello,

 I'm getting unusable DTMF detection with DISA on incoming ZAP channel
 (bristuffed *) on quadbri from GSM gateway. DTMF detection works ok in
 normal ISDN incoming line.

I'm having similar problems with a gsm gateway connected to x100p.
The DTMF for 1, 4 and 7 are detected fine, but 2, 5 and 8 gets detected dupe
and 3 6 and 9 aren't detected.

Anyone has any idea? i've already tried relaxdtmf=yes with no success.

Regards,
Marcelo.

---
Este mensaje está libre de virus - www.v2r.com.ar

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] list down?

2005-06-01 Thread Gregory Junker

No problems here. 27 min behind according to your post time.

Dean Collins wrote:
List doesnt seem to be posting out  still active here 
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2005-June/date.html but 
not being received by email (time warner is the isp but other emails 
coming in every few minutes as per normal).


 


Cheers,

Dean

 

 

 

 





___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] HELP Cisco - can't find P0S3-07-4-00.sbn

2005-06-01 Thread Robert Goodyear


On Jun 1, 2005, at 9:38 AM, Ing CIP Alejandro Celi Mariátegui wrote:



What I need to do?  Rename/Copy P003-07-4-00.bin to P0S3-07-4-00.sbn

Regards,

--
Ing CIP Alejandro Celi Mariátegui
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



No, renaming won't work, as it's a signed binary. Plus S versus O 
designates the application type.


The file came with your firmware download from Cisco; it should have 
included:


OS79XX.TXT
POS3-07-4-00.bin
POS3-07-4-00.loads
POS3-07-4-00.sb2
POO3-07-4-00.bin
POO3-07-4-00.sbn

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Fax and codecs preferences to PSTN

2005-06-01 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9?= Mayorga
Hi, 
I have an asterisk running with a passtrought conf with G729,
when I try to send a fax from SIP to SIP  the ATAs make a good codec
negociation and the fax transmicion is OK,

But when I try to send the fax to PSTN fax machine 
(SIP -- AS5400 -- PSTN)
The ATA Device try to send the RTP with G711ulaw and the Cisco keep
answereing with G729
a snip some part of my confs.

 sip.conf 
[general]
port=5060
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
context=default 
allow=g729
.
.
.
[22194007]
type=friend
host=dynamic
secret=22194007
canreinvite=yes
callerid=ATA Sipura FAX 22194007
.
.
.

[as5400]
type=friend
host=XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
canreinvite=yes
insecure=yes
insecure=very
qualify=yes

/sip.conf


as5400

dial-peer voice 999001 pots
 description PRUEBAS SIP
 max-conn 3
 destination-pattern 65732.%
 progress_ind alert enable 8
 port 7/5:D
!
dial-peer voice 999000 voip
 description PRUEBAS SIP
 destination-pattern 2219400.
 session protocol sipv2
 session target sip-server
 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric
 fax-relay ecm disable
 fax rate 9600
 fax nsf 00
 fax protocol pass-through g711alaw
 no vad

/as5400

Thanks in advance
-- 
René Mayorga
Internet  Data 
El Salvador Telecom S.A. de S.V.
Tel:(503) 2247-7246
(503) 2247-7156
Cel:(503) 7962-8205

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] ARESKICC - Another issue

2005-06-01 Thread Julius Igugu
Try manually creating the file first.

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all,
 
  
 
 After finally making the web interface for AreskiCC work I am now running
 into new issues. 
 
  
 
 1 - In Asterisk the manager doesn't seem to connect
 
 2 - When I try to create the file additional_areskicc_sip.conf it says
 Could not open buddy file '/etc/asterisk/additional_areskicc_sip.conf'
 
  
 
 Any clues?
 
  
 
  
 
  ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Julius Igugu
SouthWork Co. Ltd.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] TDM400P Channels stop answering after some time .

2005-06-01 Thread Sandeep A.S

Hi

Need help on bridging SIP with TDM400P(4 FXO Modules )

My setup is as follows


US OFFICE -TDM400P(FXO) --SIP--- TDM400P(FXOs)INDIA OFFICE
(DSL Line)  Asterisk
Asterisk   PBX(Siemens) /DSL Line
 Server  
Server


Everithing works fine for one or two calls or maximum 4 calls over
the setup.

Ie after some time zap channels are not ringing.Then I have to reload
asterisk.Once restart everithing works fine for 2 or 3 calls over the setup
then the same issue .I need to restart asterisk again .

Is it the problem with TDM400P ?
OR the problem with 2.6 Kernel ?
or  Problem with SIP and TDM Card ?
How I can troubleshoot ?

I am using Fedora core3 Kernel 2.6.9-1.667

My zaptel.conf on both systes:
loadzone = us
defaultzone=us
fxsks=1-4

My zapdata.conf on both systems :

signalling=fxs_ks
rxwink=300
usecallingpres=yes
transfer=yes
echocancel=yes
echocancelwhenbridged=yes
echotraining=yes
relaxdtmf=yes
rxgain=4.9
txgain=6.9
busydetect=yes
callprogress=yes
progzone=us
musiconhold=default
jitterbuffers=4

My sip.conf on both systems
[pbx]
type=friend
username=pbx
secret=pbx
host=192.168.X.Y
dtmfmode=info
insecure=very
qualify=no
disallow=all
allow=ulaw

Do you want any more details ?

thanks
-Sandeep
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] VoiPSupply Dot Com

2005-06-01 Thread Race Vanderdecken








Give it a break you freakin
Cry Baby



Race the Tyrant Vanderdecken



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl J. Vesterling
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:05
PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -
Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users]
VoiPSupply Dot Com




Interesting... Seems the first portion of the message of the previous
post got chopped...

Garrett, evidently there is some verbage to that effect on the site. But
just to let you know, no other business that we've done business with requires
anything like that. Not a one. 

Also worthy of note is that the purchase was not a credit card order, so I'm
rather surprised your terms regarding credit cards would apply.

In retrospect, I guess I should have spent the 16 hours browsing your site
looking for the fine print instead of waiting for a prompt shipment.

But, alas... We found someone that knows how to do business with
businesses.


At 07:30 PM 5/31/2005, you wrote:



www.myriadsupply.com
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Joe Scinta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 12:55 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: Your request for a Cisco pricing quote from Myriad
Supply
 
  great hilary and will we be able to accomplish terms (net1) with
your
  company?
 
  Joseph A. Scinta
  President KEN-TON Electronics Inc.


187 Greenacres Rd.


Tonawanda, NY 14150 (716-837-9168)
 
  PRODUCTION Facility:


KEN-TON ELECTRONICS INC


2256 Sheridan Drive


BUFFALO NY 14223 (716-875-5114)
 
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Hilary DeCourcey - Myriad Supply
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: 'joe scinta' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 12:46 PM
  Subject: RE: Your request for a Cisco pricing quote from Myriad
Supply
 
 
   Hi Joe,
  
   Thank you for contacting Myriad Supply for your Cisco needs.
This is
 what
  we
   have for you:
  
   CP-7960G @ $299 (New) - requires 2 week lead
   CP-PWR-CUBE @ $38/ea (New Cisco)
   CP-PWR-CUBE @ $22/ea (New OEM)
  
   All phones are backed by a One Year Warranty. Extended
warranties and
  Cisco
   SMARTnets are also available. A standard Cisco SMARTnet for
this phone
  would
   be $20. Please let me know if you have any questions or
would like to
  place
   an order.
  
   Best,
  
   Hilary
   Myriad Supply Company, LLC
   212.366.6996 phone x114
   212.859.7329 fax
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   AIM: MyriadHilary
   www.myriadsupply.com
  

-- END EXCERPT --


At 03:00 PM 5/31/2005, you wrote:



Karl:

http://www.voipsupply.com/credit_authorization/

If you read the second paragraph it explains our policy as it refers to the
billing and shipping addresses.

**PLEASE NOTE**
If your billing address and shipping address are different you should call your
credit card company and have your shipping address added as a valid address. If
you do not do this your order may be delayed or possibly cancelled.

This is where everyone is getting their information from.

Thanks,

Garrett Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
716-250-3408 Direct
716-903-9495 Cell








From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Karl J. Vesterling
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 12:30
PM
To: C F; Asterisk Users Mailing
List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users]
VoiPSupply Dot Com


I'm amazed that this thread keeps going... 

About the claim of Ship-To being on file with bank...

CDW doesn't have a problem with it... Ingram Micro doesn't have a problem
with it. Merisel doesn't have a problem with it. Digi-Key doesn't
have a problem with it... Why would Voip-Supply???

We accept packages every day with the same Ship-To address specified to
Voip-Supply...

Additional comments dispursed throughout

At 02:32 PM 5/27/2005, you wrote:

On 5/27/05, Karl J. Vesterling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 At 08:59 AM 5/27/2005, you wrote:
 
 [ snip for brevity ]
 I just wanted to clarify ... this isn't a voipsupply.com problem at
all,
 but 
 rather a courier screwup... which happens anywhere and at anytime...
right?
 
 TWO screw ups in the shipment.
 1.) It was shipped to the Bill-To address. Since there is no
one there
 during the day I had to sit and wait for it lest it not be delivered.

This screw up has to do with the person that ordered it, because they
didn't have the ship to address on file with their bank.

This was not a paypal transaction.
The PO had BIG BOLD LETTERS - Ship To:

I'm unaware of any practices with the bank that requiring Ship-To addresses to
be on file with them. 
Perhaps your financial institution is a bit different?



 2.) when an order is placed on a Tuesday AM (or) Monday PM, and it's
 priority overnight, and it's across town, and the tracking number was
 supplied on Wednesday one would expect that it would show up Thursday, not
 Friday.

See above, again this is a screw up that happened because of the one
that ordered it, by NOT having the ship to address on file with their
bank.


[Asterisk-Users] Dell SC1425 and TE110P

2005-06-01 Thread Oswaldo Arratia
Hi List

I bought 1 Dell SC1425 server and 1 Digium TE110P T1/E1 card.
I installed Asterisk from aah 1.0

In the CLI I type 'genzaptelconf -svd' as I have done with other servers and
FXO cards to detect and configure the cards; this time it is not recognizing
the T1 card.

Any ideas why this might be happening??

Thanks!

Oswaldo


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] tellme hiring VXML

2005-06-01 Thread Dean Collins








Btw just in case someone is looking, maybe we can get
someone on the inside to help out J









http://www.tellme.com/job_voice-xml.html






 
  
  
  
 
 
  
  
  
 



Service Production
Engineering: Senior Engineer, Applications and Tools
Tellme leads the industry in large-scale deployments of voice-enabled services,
having answered over 1 billion calls to date. Radical improvements in voice
recognition at scale and the rapid progress of VoIP for carrier integration are
enabling a new generation of services at low cost.

Tellme is rapidly
expanding to address the opportunities in automated directory assistance,
next-generation telephony services (Dial Tone 2.0), and the tools
and infrastructure to support those services. Tellme seeks software engineers
to lead this effort, working hand-in-hand with cross-functional teams of subject
matter experts. 

Requirements: 


 3+ years software engineering
 and systems integration experience requiring first-rate problem solving
 and analytical skills 
 Extensive web programming
 experience using _javascript_, cvs, Document Object Model, and perl at scale
 in UNIX environments 
 Excellent internal
 cross-functional communication skills a must; client-facing professional
 services experience preferred 
 Practical experience delivering
 budgetary estimates and familiarity with speech recognition, VoiceXML,
 _javascript_ interpreter, and telephony a plus 


Please send resumes to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk compatible, hot swappable PRI card

2005-06-01 Thread Race Vanderdecken
Hmmm,

You are going to price yourself out of the market if you go with
hot swap.

If I understand you correctly that is.

Your residential gateway sits in a home and connects to the
internet to do VoIP calls for the owner.

What is your cost for this gateway? Doing hot swap is going to
add, let's say, $500 to the cost.

If the system goes down because of the hot swap card who is
going to replace it? 
The customer? Well if the machine is down then a reboot isn't
that big a deal vs. the extra cost.

A service tech? Well if the machine is down then a reboot isn't
that big a deal vs. the extra cost.

Besides you would have to have a spare card at the customer's
house. So every house has to have more expense and costs.

Sorry if my assumption is wrong. I went through a similar
exercise once.

Race the tyrant Vanderdecken

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick
Fortin
Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 10:59 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk compatible, hot swappable PRI card 

Hi

We are in a project where we will use asterisk as a residential gateway
for 
IP phone service.

We are aiming to replace the primary phone line so the service must be
up 
as long as possible so we are looking at ways to avoid shut downs.

We are looking for a solution to allow us to add/remove PRI cards
without 
shutting down the system

Is there such a thing as an asterisk compatible hot-swappable PRI card
and 
board ?

Someone told me to look at the C-PCI technology, it seems that telecom 
company use this.

Thanks

Patrick

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Pass-through

2005-06-01 Thread BJ Weschke
 It is likely possible. It's going to depend on getting * and your
modem bank to play nice together. If your modem bank is collecting ANI
or any kind of other carrier signaling info for normal operation, you
might have an easier time doing EM wink between * and the modem bank
if your modem bank support thats. The setup you're looking to put
together here doesn't appear to be much different than folks who have
hooked up an * device to an Avaya Definity or other PBX via a PRI tie
line.

On 6/1/05, Adam Vocks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
 
 In an order to save money, I would like to use a PRI that we have going to
 one of our dial-up modem banks (We are an ISP.)  During business hours these
 channels are idle and during our peak internet times, we are closed.  Sounds
 too good to be true, but I thought I would throw it out there.  These are
 modem calls that if they would call our modem bank number, they would be
 bridged to the outbound zap channels???  And of course, if they dial our
 business number we would send them to the appropriate sip channels.  I
 didn't know if this could be done with two T1 cards and asterisk 
 
   
 
 Here is a primitive sketch. 
 
  
 
 If anyone has information, please share. 
 
   
 
 Thank You 
 
   
 
 Adam Vocks 
 
 CTI 
 
   
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] 99% cpu on asterisk with chan_unicall and low traffic

2005-06-01 Thread Andres Maduro
Hi, 

I made a full strace of the running Asterisk process during a high load 99% of 
cpu usage, aprox. ~800 MBytes of data was gathered and found
lots of errors in this log.

The errors started when * tried to open a /dev/zap/channel file (before this, 
there were other errors but I think there are harmless).  Following, I include 
some pieces of the log and an url if you want to download the whole thing in 
gzipped format (25 Mbytes).

..
1085  open(/dev/zap/channel, O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK unfinished ...
1091  ... fcntl64 resumed )   = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
1085  ... open resumed )  = 34
1091  fcntl64(3615, F_GETFL unfinished ...
1085  ioctl(34, 0x40044a26 unfinished ...
1091  ... fcntl64 resumed )   = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
1085  ... ioctl resumed , 0xbfffdb4c) = 0
1091  fcntl64(3616, F_GETFL unfinished ...
1085  ioctl(34, 0x80184a1c unfinished ...
1091  ... fcntl64 resumed )   = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)
1085  ... ioctl resumed , 0xbfffdd60) = 0
1091  fcntl64(3617, F_GETFL unfinished ...
1085  ioctl(34, 0x40184a1b unfinished ...
1091  ... fcntl64 resumed )   = -1 EBADF (Bad file descriptor)

When the cpu is at 99%, lots of 

  write(34, \321\321\321\323\320\323\320\320\321\320\323\320\320\322..., 
160)
= -1 EAGAIN (Resour
ce temporarily unavailable)
  write(34, \321\321\321\323\320\323\320\320\321\320\323\320\320\322..., 
160)
= -1 EAGAIN (Resour
ce temporarily unavailable)

ocurrs which is a FD for /dev/zap/channel.

I think there is a problem with file descriptor 34 which is /dev/zap/channel.  
My zaptel.conf is as follows:

# Span 1: WCT1/0 Digium Wildcard TE110P T1/E1 Card 0 HDB3/ 
span=1,1,0,cas,hdb3
cas=1-15:1101
cas=17-31:1101

# Span 2: WCTDM/0 Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F Board 1 
fxols=32
fxols=33
fxols=34
fxols=35

and the MFCR2 proto configuration in unicall is as follows:

protocolclass=mfcr2
protocolvariant=ve,10,7
protocolend=co
group = 1
channel = 1-15
group = 2
channel = 17-31

This could give us more clues as to where the problem might be located.  Your 
comments are welcome.

The full gzipped 25 Mbytes log can be downloaded from 
http://www.iconos.com.ve/download/unicall/asterisk-kia-unicall-strace.out.gz

Regards.
Andres.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Alternate DID

2005-06-01 Thread Asterisk
I have 3 Asterisk systems that connected through IAX2 trunks. System 1 has a 
TE110P installed with a PRI and routes calls based on calling number to systems 
2 and 3 through the IAX2 trunk.

Systems 2 and 3 have TDM400P cards installed for failover and emergency/911.

I am having problems configuring an alternate route if the IAX2 trunk is down 
to the destination system (2 or 3) from system 1. Ideally, I would like to be 
able to route the call over the PSTN to the TDM400P if the IAX2 trunk is down 
or even forward the call to an answering service.

So far I am not having any luck so I was hoping that someone out there would be 
able to share a similar configuration.

Thanks,
Dave Lewis

 


Sent via the ISCG Web Mail system at !--http://MAIL.iscg.net--


 
   
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TDM400P vs SIP3000 x2

2005-06-01 Thread Andres Paglayan

Thank you very much for all answers.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Cannot receive incoming calls via ISDN

2005-06-01 Thread Igor Colombi
I'm experimenting with asterisk. This is my environment:

- Debian sarge (vanilla kernel 2.4.29)
- Asterisk 1.0.7-BRIstuffed-0.2.0-RC8g
- Two sip phones (One cisco 7905 and one soft-phones X-Lite)
- Digi International Datafire Micro V (Europe) (rev 02) (zaphfc)

After two days of work now  I can call between the two sip phones and
I can call from sip phones to outside numbers via ISDN card.

Now I'm not able to call one of the two numbers assigned to the ISDN
line and forward the call to the sip phones. When I try to call my two
assigned number I can't get any response.

This im my configuration:

***
ztcfg -vvv

Zaptel Configuration
==

SPAN 1: CCS/ AMI Build-out: 399-533 feet (DSX-1)

Channel map:

Channel 01: Individual Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 01)
Channel 02: Individual Clear channel (Default) (Slaves: 02)
Channel 03: D-channel (Default) (Slaves: 03)

3 channels configured.
***
cat /etc/zaptel.conf

loadzone=it
defaultzone=it
span=1,1,3,ccs,ami
bchan=1-2
dchan=3

***
cat /etc/asterisk/zapata.conf

[channels]
switchtype = euroisdn
signalling = bri_cpe
context=incoming
usecallerid=yes
echocancel=yes
callprogress=yes
transfer=yes
setcallerid(${CALLERIDNUM})
overlapdial=yes
immediate=no
callgroup = 1
group = 1
channel = 1-2
language=it

***
*CLI zap show channels
   Chan Extension  Context Language   MusicOnHold
 pseudoincomingit
  1incoming
  2incoming
***
*CLI show dialplan
[ Context 'incoming' created by 'pbx_config' ]
  '+390372xx' = 1. Dial(SIP/cisco2)   [pbx_config]
  '00372xx' =  1. Dial(SIP/cisco2)   [pbx_config]
  'xx' = 1. Dial(SIP/cisco2)   [pbx_config]
  '0372xx' =   1. Dial(SIP/cisco2)   [pbx_config]
  '390372xx' = 1. Dial(SIP/cisco2)   [pbx_config]
  '' =   1. Dial(SIP/cisco2)   [pbx_config]


[ Context 'default' created by 'pbx_config' ]
  '100' =  1. dial(SIP/topper)   [pbx_config]
  '103' =  1. dial(SIP/cisco2)   [pbx_config]
  'cisco2' =   1. goto(103|1)[pbx_config]
  'topper' =   1. goto(100|1)[pbx_config]
  '_0.' =  1. Dial(Zap/g1/${EXTEN})  [pbx_config]

***

I'm in stale: if I call cisco2 via sip it works, but when i try to
call from an external line the number 0372xx (xx is omitted)
nothing happens. What can I do to debug this?

Thanks in advance for you attention.

Igor
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Pri restarting randomly (TE110P or TE405P)

2005-06-01 Thread Niklas Larsson
Hi,

we have a E1 pri from Citylink, (they are using Ericsson Engine exchange), that 
are restarting after 5 - 15 minutes, before and after that we can make calls in 
and out w/o problems. The cards have been tested in two computers (Atholon XP 
2200+ and Celeron 2.6Ghz), are on there own IRQ, not showing any IRQ misses in 
zttool. It's all correctly configuered - zaptel and zapata (attached). We have 
tried with Asterisk 1.0.7 and CVS Head. Digium has done the loopbacktests w/o 
errors.

Our question is, is this hardware, software or pri related? What can we do?

The PRI is used to an Lucent pbx and is working fine, but when we connect it to 
asterisk we get this log (CVS HEAD):

May 31 20:08:31 NOTICE[1522] chan_zap.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on 
Primary D-channel of span 1
May 31 20:08:31 NOTICE[1522] chan_zap.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on 
Primary D-channel of span 1
May 31 20:09:17 NOTICE[1522] chan_zap.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on 
Primary D-channel of span 1
May 31 20:09:17 NOTICE[1522] chan_zap.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on 
Primary D-channel of span 1
May 31 20:20:49 WARNING[1522] app_dial.c: Unable to forward frame
May 31 20:21:37 NOTICE[1522] chan_zap.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on 
Primary D-channel of span 1
May 31 20:21:37 NOTICE[1522] chan_zap.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on 
Primary D-channel of span 1
May 31 20:21:47 NOTICE[1522] chan_zap.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on 
Primary D-channel of span 1
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: [Span 0 D-Channel 0] PRI: Write to 48 
failed: Unknown error 500
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: [Span 0 D-Channel 0] PRI: Short 
write: 0/15 (Unknown error 500)
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 3: Red Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: [Span 0 D-Channel 0] PRI: Write to 48 
failed: Unknown error 500
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: [Span 0 D-Channel 0] PRI: Short 
write: 0/15 (Unknown error 500)
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 1: Red Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: [Span 0 D-Channel 0] PRI: Write to 48 
failed: Unknown error 500
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: [Span 0 D-Channel 0] PRI: Short 
write: 0/15 (Unknown error 500)
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 2: Red Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: [Span 0 D-Channel 0] PRI: Write to 48 
failed: Unknown error 500
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: [Span 0 D-Channel 0] PRI: Short 
write: 0/15 (Unknown error 500)
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 4: Red Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 6: Red Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 6
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 7: Red Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 7
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 8: Red Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 8
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 9: Red Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 9
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 10: Red 
Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 10
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 11: Red 
Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 11
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 12: Red 
Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 12
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 13: Red 
Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 13
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 14: Red 
Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 14
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 15: Red 
Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 15
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 17: Red 
Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 17
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 18: Red 
Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 18
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on channel 19: Red 
Alarm
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Unable to disable echo cancellation 
on channel 19
May 31 20:23:49 WARNING[1522] chan_zap.c: Detected alarm on 

[Asterisk-Users] voice-coloring with asterisk

2005-06-01 Thread Script Head
I was pondering of the best way to implement voice-coloring within
Asterisk, e.g. pass a channel thru a multiband equalizer and modify it
enough where it could be distinguished from other voices in a
conference call. This could make conference calls much less confusing.

Perhaps the easiest way would be to use sox as the equalizer but I am
not familiar enough with * to know how to put a channel thru sox.
Anyone?

Scripthead
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] A Way to Write DTMF Digits as text to CDR?

2005-06-01 Thread PA
I've gotten my CDR working the way I like, but I am looking to customize it a 
bit.  I have set up an IVR menu, which works great.  I would like to be able to 
capture the prompted DTMF digits pressed by callers, to my CDR database but I 
don't see any AGI or Asterisk commands that allow one to customize the CDR 
contents.  Am I thinking about this on the wrong track?  If someone calls sales 
for instance, and presses 44364 for their PO number when prompted, I just want 
to have a text record of the digits they pressed in my CDR so I can easily view 
it.  No trying to do database lookups or screen pops from it or anything fancy, 
I'm trying to eat an elephant one bite at a time.  Anyone have a solution for 
that?  

I hope I'm not being a pest by asking a question every other day, but the 
responses I've gotten have been very helpful.  I'm trying to learn as much as I 
can from the array of documentation, and I swear I'm only asking when I feel 
like I've exhausted what I could find.  
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] HELP Cisco - can't find P0S3-07-4-00.sbn

2005-06-01 Thread Ing CIP Alejandro Celi =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mari=E1tegui?=
El mié, 01-06-2005 a las 12:34, Robert Goodyear escribió:
 No, renaming won't work, as it's a signed binary. Plus S versus O 
 designates the application type.

Yes, that's correct, S isn't the same to O

My firmware version is 6.3. I check info on these files:

cat OS79XX.TXT
POS3-07-4-00

and

SIPDefault.cnf
# Image Version
image_version: P0S3-07-4-00


 The file came with your firmware download from Cisco; it should have 
 included:
 
 OS79XX.TXT
 POS3-07-4-00.bin
 POS3-07-4-00.loads
 POS3-07-4-00.sb2
 POO3-07-4-00.bin
 POO3-07-4-00.sbn

I have the same files, and got this error messages:

Connection received from 192.168.100.183 on port 50182 [06/01
00:08:55.080]
Read request for file OS79XX.TXT. Mode octet [06/01 00:08:55.080]
OS79XX.TXT: sent 1 blk, 15 bytes in 0 s. 0 blk resent [06/01
00:08:55.080]
Connection received from 192.168.100.183 on port 50183 [06/01
00:08:55.080]
Read request for file SIPDefault.cnf. Mode octet [06/01 00:08:55.080]
SIPDefault.cnf: sent 12 blks, 6110 bytes in 0 s. 0 blk resent [06/01
00:08:55.130]
Connection received from 192.168.100.183 on port 50184 [06/01
00:08:55.190]
Read request for file SIP001319ACBD66.cnf. Mode octet [06/01
00:08:55.190]
SIP001319ACBD66.cnf: sent 2 blks, 823 bytes in 0 s. 0 blk resent
[06/01 00:08:55.190]
Connection received from 192.168.100.183 on port 50185 [06/01
00:08:56.510]
Read request for file P0S3-07-4-00.sbn. Mode octet [06/01
00:08:56.510]
File P0S3-07-4-00.sbn : error 2 in system call CreateFile, Not found.
[06/01 00:08:56.510]
Connection received from 192.168.100.183 on port 50187 [06/01
00:08:57.110]
Connection received from 192.168.100.183 on port 50188 [06/01
00:08:57.110]
Read request for file RINGLIST.DAT. Mode octet [06/01 00:08:57.110]
Read request for file dialplan.xml. Mode octet [06/01 00:08:57.110]
RINGLIST.DAT: sent 1 blk, 44 bytes in 0 s. 0 blk resent [06/01
00:08:57.220]
dialplan.xml: sent 3 blks, 1429 bytes in 0 s. 0 blk resent [06/01
00:08:57.220]

Hope that you can help me...

Regards,

-- 
Ing CIP Alejandro Celi Mariátegui 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] list of settings

2005-06-01 Thread Andres Paglayan

Dear all,
Sorry to ask, but...
Do you know where I can find a full list of configuration parameters and 
values for each of the .conf files?

Do default .conf files include all options?
Thanks Again

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE11OP - Mitel 200Sx??

2005-06-01 Thread Scott Wolfe
Does anyone know the pinout to make a cable so that My Asterisk can talk to
my Mitel 200SX?


- Original Message - 
From: Henry Devito [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE11OP - Mitel 200Sx??


 According to the Mitel manuals that version of SX-200D can only use a
 regular 24 channel T1.  It can not use a PRI interface.  You are going to
 have to configure * to use a standard T1 not a PRI D4/AMI is the correct
 signaling.
 - Original Message - 
 From: Scott Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 11:09 AM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE11OP - Mitel 200Sx??


  Thanks Henry,
   -Scott
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Henry Devito [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
  Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 11:05 PM
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE11OP - Mitel 200Sx??
 
 
 I am trying to locate the manual for that level software.  If it's not
 here at home it is at my office and I will look everything up in the
 morning.
  - Original Message - 
  From: Scott Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 9:00 PM
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE11OP - Mitel 200Sx??
 
 
  The Switch is since 1995 and I get a SX-200 Digital G1005 ENH 672P /
  F25.0 09-FEB1994 when I look up the software on the switch board so if
I
  am reading what your telling me then I have to do D4/AMI. So does my
  zaptel look correct? Maybe my cableing is off.
  Thanks,
   -Scott
  - Original Message - 
  From: Henry Devito [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Asterisk Users Mailing List -
  Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
  Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 8:34 PM
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE11OP - Mitel 200Sx??
 
 
  Of course there are exceptions to the rules.  I see now on a couple
  software releases where they do allow PRI with D4/AMI and PRI with
  esf/b8zs.  It's been a year or so since I messed with trunking on a
  200, I've mostly been installing and maintaining the SX2000's and
  3300's.
 
  Henry
 
 
 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Dennis Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
  asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
  Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 9:13 PM
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] TE11OP - Mitel 200Sx??
 
 
 I have done the same thing with an sx200 and a pri circuit
 
  My sx200 can only do ami d4 and em channels
 
  Here's parts of my config that takes the pri and converts it to em
  with
  ANI  DNIS
 
  zaptel.conf
 
  # t1 connected to the PRI circuit
  span=1,1,0,exf,b8zs
 
  # t1 connected to SX200
  # the t1 card on my sx200 did d4 ami and I supplied ANI and DNIS
  through
  the dial plan
 
  span=2,0,0,d4,ami
 
  bchan=1-23
  dchan=24
  em=25-47
  -
  zapata.conf
 
  [channels]
 
  echocancel=yes
  echocancelwhenbridged=yes
  echotraining=no
  rxgain=0.0
  txgain=0.0
  useincomingcalleridonzaptransfer=yes
  restrictcid=no
  context=default
  usecallingpres=yes
  usercallerid=yes
  hidecallerid=no
  callerid=Company Name8005551212
  signalling=pri_cpe
  switchtype=dms100
  group=1
  channel = 1-23
 
  group=2
  signalling=em_w
  emdigitwait=500
  channel = 24-47
 
  # I needed the emdigitwait=500 to wait long enough for the SX200 to
  dial
  out it's digits
 
 
  --
  extensions.conf
 
  # our PRI circiut gave us the last 4 digits of the dialed number and
  this
  is how I passed
  #   *ANI*DNIS*  to the SX200 for it to decode
 
  # the first group were individual numbers that mapped to faxes and
  modems
 
  exten = 1234,1,Dial(Zap/g2/*${CALLERIDNUM}*${EXTEN}*,,r)
  exten = ,1,Dial(Zap/g2/*${CALLERIDNUM}*${EXTEN}*,,r)
  exten = ,1,Dial(Zap/g2/*${CALLERIDNUM}*${EXTEN}*,,r)
 
  # this set mapped our did 5000 - 5199 to the SX200
 
  exten = _5[0-1]XX,1,Dial(Zap/g2/*${CALLERIDNUM}*${EXTEN}*,,r)
 
  The reset of the dial plan took what ever I set up in the sx200 ARS
to
  dial
  out and
  sent out put Zap/G1
 
 
  Hope this helps
 
 
 
 
  --
  From: Henry Devito[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 8:56 PM
  To: Scott Wolfe; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
  Discussion
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TE11OP - Mitel 200Sx??
 
  File: ATT00262.htmlFile: ATT00263.txt
  I was wrong.  I just looked in my Mitel IM's.  What level software
  are you
  on in the SX200?  Up until a certain level 200's could only do
D4/AMI
  T1's,
  they could not do PRI's.  

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk@Home 1.1b1 has been released

2005-06-01 Thread Kanuri, Seshu (Company IT)
I don't see the SugarCRM being part of the install. 
How do you activate this?

Seshu


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 4:55 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.1b1 has been released

We have replaced the simple contact management system in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with SugarCRM a full CRM system. This might seem like over kill for a
home PBX but Sugar has the best contact management we have seen. With
click to dial functionality and the ability to import data from other
contact managers it's a great fit for [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We have also added new version of the usual Asterisk software AMP and
Flash operator panel.

Download from http://asteriskathome.sourceforge.net

For support please read the [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handbook
http://asteriskathome.sourceforge.net/handbook/index.html

and use our support forum at
http://sourceforge.net/forum/?group_id=123387




__
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 

 
NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender.  Sender does 
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. 
 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >