[asterisk-users] TxFax works only with one of 2 PRI

2009-10-21 Thread martin cabrera
Hi there,

I'm Using TxFAX to send faxes via Zaptel PRI. I have 2 PSTN PRI Providers,
with the first provider, all faxes are trasmited fine. With the second
provider, faxes can't be sent, we suspect about the setting of this PRI
provider, perhaps is doing some compression somewhere. Any suggestion
welcome.

I've tried these txfax calls with these results:

txfax(${FAXFILE}):  Fax receive not successful - result (50) Disconnected
after permitted retries
txfax(${FAXFILE}|||ecm): Fax send not successful - result (51) The call
dropped prematurely.
txfax(${FAXFILE}|caller|debug|): Fax receive not successful - result (13)
Unexpected message received.

For detailed logs please take a look of http://www.pastebin.ca/1634790

Cordialmente,

Martin Cabrera
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] txfax/rxfax fun

2008-12-22 Thread Danny Nicholas
Hi Gang,

 I'm trying to make an application to upload a tiff via a web
interface, slap a cover page onto it, merge the two into a new tiff and send
it out via txfax.  I'm able to get it out to a fax machine using this
sequence:

/usr/bin/tiff2pdf /tmp/faxout/1229978819_filea.tif -o
/tmp/faxout/1229978819_filea.pdf
/usr/bin/gs -dBATCH -dNOPAUSE -q -sDEVICE=pdfwrite
-OutputFile=/srv/www/htdocs/faxout/1229978819_fin.pdf
/srv/www/htdocs/faxout/1229978819_faxout.pdf
/tmp/faxout/1229978819_filea.pdf
cp /srv/www/htdocs/faxout/1229978819_fin.pdf
/srv/www/htdocs/faxout/1229978819_faxout.pdf
convert -compress group4 -monochrome -negate -units pixelsperinch -page
1758x1075 /srv/www/htdocs/faxout/1229978819_fin.pdf
/srv/www/htdocs/faxout/1229978819_out.tif

 

Call file 

Channel: Zap/2/ww205xxx,60

CallerID: SIP/108

MaxRetries: 1

WaitTime: 60

retryTime: 5

SetVar: LOCALHEADERINFO=Asterisk Fax 

Application: txfax

Data: /srv/www/htdocs/faxout/1229978108_out.tif|caller|debug|ecm

 

The problems I'm having are:

1.  RXFax won't receive the fax
2.  I can't change the page resolution or TXFax will fail to send the
fax.

 

Any Ideas?

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing

2008-04-16 Thread Mindaugas Kezys
AGX-Addons crashes Asterisk for us.

 

Working solution (on 100+ servers we installed):

 

-

 

apt-get -y install g++ libtiff4 libtiff4-dev patch autoconf automake
libtiff-tools 

 

cd /usr/src

wget
http://www.soft-switch.org/downloads/snapshots/spandsp/spandsp-20080402.tar.
gz

 

tar xzvf spandsp-20080402.tar.gz

cd /usr/src/spandsp-0.0.4

./configure

make

make install

 

echo /usr/local/lib  /etc/ld.so.conf

ldconfig

 

cd /usr/src

wget http://193.138.191.205/packets/fax_apps_asterisk14.tgz

tar xzvf fax_apps_asterisk14.tgz

cd /usr/src/fax_apps

make

make install

 



 

Restart Asterisk.

 

Voila!

 

Regards,

Mindaugas Kezys

http://www.kolmisoft.com

MOR PRO - Advanced Billing for Asterisk

 

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 5:07 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing

 

No progress at all. Version from Debian/Lenny repository still crashes and
I'm not able to compile AGX. It gives out a long list of error messages.
Some unsatisfied dependencies...?

I Can't experiment for a while after unwanted night-time visit of
fire-fighters :-( I have to let everything dry and clean out of sand and
drywall pieces :-(

Martin

- Original Message - 

From: Justin Newman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com 

Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: 11. dubna 2008 13:00

Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing

 

Did this just start happening with the 1.4 tree? 

Have you made any progress on getting it resolved?

Justin Newman

Matt Riddell wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 Let's be more specific here, folks:

 What version numbers?

 Asterisk, spandsp, agx-addons / rx-tx-fax?

 Asterisk: yesterday's 1.4 SVN
 SpanDSP: tried with pre 15, 16 and 18
 AGX-Addons: tried with 1.4.5 and svn trunk
 rx/txfax: supplied by AGX Addons - although they seem to build the files
 and stick them into the modules directory, rather than adding to the
 apps directory and modifying the Makefile.

i have Asterisk 1.4.18, SpanDSP 0.0.4pre16, AGX addons 1.4.5
linux kernel 2.6.18 AMD64. it (Asterisk) segfault on rxfax
when i enable faxdetect in zapata.conf. since then it disabled
faxdetect and use nvfaxdetect function in dialplan, it works
fine afterward.

also it seems to works fine using regular 32bit kernel.

-- 
Edwin Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Engineer, Office General, Inc.
Ph: +1 415 439 4988 Fax: +1 415 283 3370
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD6506D20
search=0xD6506D20

 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

  _  

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing

2008-04-15 Thread Martin
No progress at all. Version from Debian/Lenny repository still crashes and I'm 
not able to compile AGX. It gives out a long list of error messages. Some 
unsatisfied dependencies...?
I Can't experiment for a while after unwanted night-time visit of fire-fighters 
:-( I have to let everything dry and clean out of sand and drywall pieces :-(
Martin
  - Original Message - 
  From: Justin Newman 
  To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com 
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: 11. dubna 2008 13:00
  Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing


  Did this just start happening with the 1.4 tree? 

  Have you made any progress on getting it resolved?

  Justin Newman

  Matt Riddell wrote:
   -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
   Hash: SHA1
  
   Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
   Let's be more specific here, folks:
  
   What version numbers?
  
   Asterisk, spandsp, agx-addons / rx-tx-fax?
  
   Asterisk: yesterday's 1.4 SVN
   SpanDSP: tried with pre 15, 16 and 18
   AGX-Addons: tried with 1.4.5 and svn trunk
   rx/txfax: supplied by AGX Addons - although they seem to build the files
   and stick them into the modules directory, rather than adding to the
   apps directory and modifying the Makefile.
  
  i have Asterisk 1.4.18, SpanDSP 0.0.4pre16, AGX addons 1.4.5
  linux kernel 2.6.18 AMD64. it (Asterisk) segfault on rxfax
  when i enable faxdetect in zapata.conf. since then it disabled
  faxdetect and use nvfaxdetect function in dialplan, it works
  fine afterward.
  
  also it seems to works fine using regular 32bit kernel.
  
  -- 
  Edwin Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Systems Engineer, Office General, Inc.
  Ph: +1 415 439 4988 Fax: +1 415 283 3370
  http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD6506D20





  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
  http://mail.yahoo.com 



  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
  http://mail.yahoo.com 


--


  ___
  -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

  asterisk-users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing

2008-04-11 Thread Justin Newman
Did this just start happening with the 1.4 tree? 

Have you made any progress on getting it resolved?

Justin Newman

Matt Riddell wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 Let's be more specific here, folks:

 What version numbers?

 Asterisk, spandsp, agx-addons / rx-tx-fax?

 Asterisk: yesterday's 1.4 SVN
 SpanDSP: tried with pre 15, 16 and 18
 AGX-Addons: tried with 1.4.5 and svn trunk
 rx/txfax: supplied by AGX Addons - although they seem to build the files
 and stick them into the modules directory, rather than adding to the
 apps directory and modifying the Makefile.

i have Asterisk 1.4.18, SpanDSP 0.0.4pre16, AGX addons 1.4.5
linux kernel 2.6.18 AMD64. it (Asterisk) segfault on rxfax
when i enable faxdetect in zapata.conf. since then it disabled
faxdetect and use nvfaxdetect function in dialplan, it works
fine afterward.

also it seems to works fine using regular 32bit kernel.

-- 
Edwin Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Engineer, Office General, Inc.
Ph: +1 415 439 4988 Fax: +1 415 283 3370
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD6506D20





__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com ___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] TxFax in asterisk 1.4

2008-03-21 Thread Giordano Grandis
Hi guys,
I installed asterisk 1.4.17 and mISDN 1.1.7 with AGX addons to test the faxs. 
If I receive i do not have any problem, but i'm not able to send put any fax, i 
get always the same error:
 
txfax_exec: transmission done with ast_read(chan) == NULL
 
Anyone has txfax working with asterisk 1.4? I try to download app_rxfax.c and 
app_txfax.c with the asterisk.patch file but without success. On HYPERLINK 
http://www.soft-switch.orgwww.soft-switch.org is not longer available.
 
Anyone can help me please ?
 
TIA
 
Giordano

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1335 - Release Date: 19/03/2008 9.54
 
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] TxFax in asterisk 1.4

2008-03-21 Thread Jonn R Taylor
No, Steve removed it from his site. I have a copy of it @ 
http://www.taylortelephone.com/asterisk/



Jonn



  _

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Giordano Grandis
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 10:13 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [asterisk-users] TxFax in asterisk 1.4



Hi guys,

I installed asterisk 1.4.17 and mISDN 1.1.7 with AGX addons to test the faxs. 
If I receive i do not have any problem, but i'm not able to send put any fax, i 
get always the same error:



txfax_exec: transmission done with ast_read(chan) == NULL



Anyone has txfax working with asterisk 1.4? I try to download app_rxfax.c and 
app_txfax.c with the asterisk.patch file but without success. On 
www.soft-switch.org is not longer available.



Anyone can help me please ?



TIA



Giordano


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1335 - Release Date: 19/03/2008 9.54




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing

2008-03-14 Thread Edwin Lam
Matt Riddell wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 Let's be more specific here, folks:

 What version numbers?

 Asterisk, spandsp, agx-addons / rx-tx-fax?
 
 Asterisk: yesterday's 1.4 SVN
 SpanDSP: tried with pre 15, 16 and 18
 AGX-Addons: tried with 1.4.5 and svn trunk
 rx/txfax: supplied by AGX Addons - although they seem to build the files
 and stick them into the modules directory, rather than adding to the
 apps directory and modifying the Makefile.

i have Asterisk 1.4.18, SpanDSP 0.0.4pre16, AGX addons 1.4.5
linux kernel 2.6.18 AMD64. it (Asterisk) segfault on rxfax
when i enable faxdetect in zapata.conf. since then it disabled
faxdetect and use nvfaxdetect function in dialplan, it works
fine afterward.

also it seems to works fine using regular 32bit kernel.

-- 
Edwin Lam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Engineer, Office General, Inc.
Ph: +1 415 439 4988 Fax: +1 415 283 3370
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xD6506D20


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing

2008-03-13 Thread lordfuknowsyou
Matt Riddell wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
   
 Let's be more specific here, folks:

 What version numbers?

 Asterisk, spandsp, agx-addons / rx-tx-fax?
 

 Asterisk: yesterday's 1.4 SVN
 SpanDSP: tried with pre 15, 16 and 18
 AGX-Addons: tried with 1.4.5 and svn trunk
 rx/txfax: supplied by AGX Addons - although they seem to build the files
 and stick them into the modules directory, rather than adding to the
 apps directory and modifying the Makefile.

 If I had to point a finger at something I'd say it was because the
 modules don't seem to be compiled against Asterisk.

 I'd love to use Asterisk 1.6, but this is a 300 seat hotel in production
 and its bad enough that faxing doesn't work - installing 1.6 beta in
 this environment would probably get my head bitten off :)

 It seems that SpanDSP no longer includes rx/txfax and that the accepted
 place to get them is that AGX-Addons package.

 - --
 Kind Regards,

 Matt Riddell
 Director
 ___

 http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution)
 http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
 http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFH2DY1DQNt8rg0Kp4RAod1AJ0UAL+d1u7XyCtsyLlemoZPYw629wCfSIR4
 SliiIjwHapNlvTWHBNYTMFM=
 =Rk/y
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

   

It seems that SpanDSP no longer includes rx/txfax and that the accepted
place to get them is that AGX-Addons package.

I have faxing working reliably using 1.4.18 and pre16 on * 1.4.18.
I noticed to that Steve doesn't provide rx/txfax and I mailed hime about it but 
never received a response. I used the above sources and compiled with those.

I can provide you with the pre16 sources if you would like.

Jeremy


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing

2008-03-12 Thread Martin
My asterisk crashes after fax is received using app_rxfax. But its not svn 
version, its binary from Debian/Lenny ...
Martin

- Original Message - 
From: Matt Riddell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: 11. brezna 2008 21:02
Subject: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing


 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Hi all,

 anyone else seen RX/TXFax crashing Asterisk on latest Asterisk SVN?

 I've now seen it on two machines I tried to set up - one it seems
 because the tiff file was malformed, but the other is doing:

 tiff - tx fax - zaptel - pstn - ddi - zaptel - rx fax - tiff

 The above crashes every time.

 If no one else has seen it/has a fix for it I can do a back trace.

 - --
 Kind Regards,

 Matt Riddell
 Director
 ___

 http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution)
 http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
 http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFH1yudDQNt8rg0Kp4RAtpyAKCkh6AQgHWYtW6gB8NgMnm/E2RoUgCgmvsx
 lVnVU5Bd8Wwk1b8GAaLyhxY=
 =4997
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing

2008-03-12 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 08:18:25AM -0400, Martin wrote:
 - Original Message - 
 From: Matt Riddell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Sent: 11. brezna 2008 21:02
 Subject: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing
 
 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  Hi all,
 
  anyone else seen RX/TXFax crashing Asterisk on latest Asterisk SVN?
 
  I've now seen it on two machines I tried to set up - one it seems
  because the tiff file was malformed, but the other is doing:
 
  tiff - tx fax - zaptel - pstn - ddi - zaptel - rx fax - tiff
 
  The above crashes every time.
 
  If no one else has seen it/has a fix for it I can do a back trace.

 My asterisk crashes after fax is received using app_rxfax. But its not svn 
 version, its binary from Debian/Lenny ...

Let's be more specific here, folks:

What version numbers?

Asterisk, spandsp, agx-addons / rx-tx-fax?

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing

2008-03-12 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 Let's be more specific here, folks:
 
 What version numbers?
 
 Asterisk, spandsp, agx-addons / rx-tx-fax?

Asterisk: yesterday's 1.4 SVN
SpanDSP: tried with pre 15, 16 and 18
AGX-Addons: tried with 1.4.5 and svn trunk
rx/txfax: supplied by AGX Addons - although they seem to build the files
and stick them into the modules directory, rather than adding to the
apps directory and modifying the Makefile.

If I had to point a finger at something I'd say it was because the
modules don't seem to be compiled against Asterisk.

I'd love to use Asterisk 1.6, but this is a 300 seat hotel in production
and its bad enough that faxing doesn't work - installing 1.6 beta in
this environment would probably get my head bitten off :)

It seems that SpanDSP no longer includes rx/txfax and that the accepted
place to get them is that AGX-Addons package.

- --
Kind Regards,

Matt Riddell
Director
___

http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution)
http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH2DY1DQNt8rg0Kp4RAod1AJ0UAL+d1u7XyCtsyLlemoZPYw629wCfSIR4
SliiIjwHapNlvTWHBNYTMFM=
=Rk/y
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing

2008-03-12 Thread Martin
 My asterisk crashes after fax is received using app_rxfax. But its not
 svn
 version, its binary from Debian/Lenny ...

 Let's be more specific here, folks:

 What version numbers?

 Asterisk, spandsp, agx-addons / rx-tx-fax?

Asterisk 1.4.17
libspandsp3 0.0.4 pre16-1
 I don't know how to tell version of rxfax/txfax (probably most important
:-) )
core show file version app_rxfax is empty... It comes as package in
Debian/Lenny, I had no time to compile from latest svn yet...

This is all I've found in log...:
[2008-03-07 19:04:44] WARNING[12700] channel.c: Unable to find a codec
translation path from unknown to unknown
[2008-03-07 19:04:44] WARNING[12700] app_rxfax.c: Unable to restore read
format on 'Zap/1-1'

After second line it crashes with segfault...

Mar  7 19:04:44 moonstone kernel: asterisk[12700]: segfault at 0011 eip
b7df079b esp b5fe0ae0 error 4

Fax is received just fine, it crashes after transfer is complete
Martin


 -- 
   Tzafrir Cohen
 icq#16849755  jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 +972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] TXFax/RXFax/AGX-Addons/SpanDSP Crashing

2008-03-11 Thread Matt Riddell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

anyone else seen RX/TXFax crashing Asterisk on latest Asterisk SVN?

I've now seen it on two machines I tried to set up - one it seems
because the tiff file was malformed, but the other is doing:

tiff - tx fax - zaptel - pstn - ddi - zaptel - rx fax - tiff

The above crashes every time.

If no one else has seen it/has a fix for it I can do a back trace.

- --
Kind Regards,

Matt Riddell
Director
___

http://www.venturevoip.com (Great new VoIP end to end solution)
http://www.venturevoip.com/news.php (Daily Asterisk News - html)
http://www.venturevoip.com/newrssfeed.php (Daily Asterisk News - rss)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH1yudDQNt8rg0Kp4RAtpyAKCkh6AQgHWYtW6gB8NgMnm/E2RoUgCgmvsx
lVnVU5Bd8Wwk1b8GAaLyhxY=
=4997
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] txfax not working with spandsp

2007-12-25 Thread Dinesh Nair
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:50:28 -0500, David Boyd wrote:

 On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 18:41 +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
  the attached log with verbose=6 and debug=6 refers.
  
  we've got a sangoma A104 (no hwec) with PRI ports 1  3 loopbacked to
  each other. we're trying to have txfax send out on one of those pri
  ports with rxfax listening on the other side, hence having asterisk
  send a fax to itself. we however have bad, and i mean really bad
  (10%) success rates.
  
  we're currently using asterisk 1.2.24 with spandsp 0.0.4-20071214
  (snapshot of 14/12/07) and we keep getting Fax send not successful -
  result (25) No response after sending a page. errors. ECM is turned
  on in both app_txfax.c and app_rxfax.c.
  
  from what we gather just reading the code, time T4 expires in txfax
  because apparently rxfax is not sending a response back out, and thus
  after the maximum message retries (3) txfax just drops the call,
  leading rxfax to say that the call was dropped prematurely.
  
  does anyone know what's going on here, and if there is a version of
  spandsp which could work in this scenario ?

timing issues on the PRI you mean ? none that we can see clearly. anything
specific we need to investigate ? zttest returns 100% all of the time. 

-- 
Regards,   /\_/\   All dogs go to heaven.
[EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)   http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/
+==oOO--(_)--OOo==+
| for a in past present future; do|
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b.  |
| done; done  |
+=+

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] txfax not working with spandsp

2007-12-21 Thread Dinesh Nair

the attached log with verbose=6 and debug=6 refers.

we've got a sangoma A104 (no hwec) with PRI ports 1  3 loopbacked to each
other. we're trying to have txfax send out on one of those pri ports with
rxfax listening on the other side, hence having asterisk send a fax to
itself. we however have bad, and i mean really bad (10%) success rates.

we're currently using asterisk 1.2.24 with spandsp 0.0.4-20071214
(snapshot of 14/12/07) and we keep getting Fax send not successful -
result (25) No response after sending a page. errors. ECM is turned on in
both app_txfax.c and app_rxfax.c.

from what we gather just reading the code, time T4 expires in txfax because
apparently rxfax is not sending a response back out, and thus after the
maximum message retries (3) txfax just drops the call, leading rxfax to
say that the call was dropped prematurely.

does anyone know what's going on here, and if there is a version of
spandsp which could work in this scenario ?

-- 
Regards,   /\_/\   All dogs go to heaven.
[EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)   http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/
+==oOO--(_)--OOo==+
| for a in past present future; do|
|   for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do   |
|   echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b.  |
| done; done  |
+=+
Dec 21 18:32:05 VERBOSE[205] logger.c: -- Attempting call on Zap/g1/1002 
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 (Retry 1)
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] chan_zap.c: Using channel 1
Dec 21 18:32:05 VERBOSE[205] logger.c: -- Requested transfer capability: 
0x00 - SPEECH
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] devicestate.c: Changing state for Zap/1 - state 2 
(In use)
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] devicestate.c: Changing state for Zap/1 - state 2 
(In use)
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] app_queue.c: Device 'Zap/1' changed to state '2' (In 
use) but we don't care because they're not a member of any queue.
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] app_queue.c: Device 'Zap/1' changed to state '2' (In 
use) but we don't care because they're not a member of any queue.
Dec 21 18:32:05 VERBOSE[205] logger.c: -- Accepting call from '' to '1002' 
on channel 0/1, span 2
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] chan_zap.c: No echo cancellation requested
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] devicestate.c: Changing state for Zap/32 - state 2 
(In use)
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] pbx.c: Launching 'Answer'
Dec 21 18:32:05 VERBOSE[205] logger.c: -- Executing Answer(Zap/32-1, ) 
in new stack
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] pbx.c: Launching 'Wait'
Dec 21 18:32:05 VERBOSE[205] logger.c: -- Executing Wait(Zap/32-1, ) in 
new stack
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] pbx.c: Launching 'Set'
Dec 21 18:32:05 VERBOSE[205] logger.c: -- Executing Set(Zap/32-1, 
FAXFILE=/tmp/FAX-1198233125.1.tiff) in new stack
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] pbx.c: Function result is '1002'
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] pbx.c: Launching 'Set'
Dec 21 18:32:05 VERBOSE[205] logger.c: -- Executing Set(Zap/32-1, 
NEWFAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/FAX-1002--11982331251198233125.1.tiff) 
in new stack
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] pbx.c: Launching 'RxFAX'
Dec 21 18:32:05 VERBOSE[205] logger.c: -- Executing RxFAX(Zap/32-1, 
/tmp/FAX-1198233125.1.tiff|debug) in new stack
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] app_queue.c: Device 'Zap/32' changed to state '2' 
(In use) but we don't care because they're not a member of any queue.
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] devicestate.c: Changing state for Zap/32 - state 2 
(In use)
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] channel.c: Set channel Zap/32-1 to read format slin
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] channel.c: Set channel Zap/32-1 to write format slin
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] app_queue.c: Device 'Zap/32' changed to state '2' 
(In use) but we don't care because they're not a member of any queue.
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] chan_zap.c: Queuing frame from PRI_EVENT_PROCEEDING 
on channel 0/1 span 1
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] chan_zap.c: No echo cancellation requested
Dec 21 18:32:05 VERBOSE[205] logger.c: Channel Zap/1-1 was answered.
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] pbx.c: Launching 'Answer'
Dec 21 18:32:05 VERBOSE[205] logger.c: -- Executing Answer(Zap/1-1, ) 
in new stack
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] pbx.c: Launching 'Set'
Dec 21 18:32:05 VERBOSE[205] logger.c: -- Executing Set(Zap/1-1, 
CDR(userfield)=FAX-1) in new stack
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] pbx.c: Launching 'TxFAX'
Dec 21 18:32:05 VERBOSE[205] logger.c: -- Executing TxFAX(Zap/1-1, 
/var/spool/asterisk/outgoing_fax/page.1.1.tiff|caller|debug) in new stack
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] channel.c: Set channel Zap/1-1 to read format slin
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] channel.c: Set channel Zap/1-1 to write format slin
Dec 21 18:32:05 DEBUG[205] devicestate.c: Changing state for Zap/1 - state 2 
(In use)
Dec 21 18:32:05 

Re: [asterisk-users] txfax not working with spandsp

2007-12-21 Thread David Boyd
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 18:41 +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote:
 the attached log with verbose=6 and debug=6 refers.
 
 we've got a sangoma A104 (no hwec) with PRI ports 1  3 loopbacked to each
 other. we're trying to have txfax send out on one of those pri ports with
 rxfax listening on the other side, hence having asterisk send a fax to
 itself. we however have bad, and i mean really bad (10%) success rates.
 
 we're currently using asterisk 1.2.24 with spandsp 0.0.4-20071214
 (snapshot of 14/12/07) and we keep getting Fax send not successful -
 result (25) No response after sending a page. errors. ECM is turned on in
 both app_txfax.c and app_rxfax.c.
 
 from what we gather just reading the code, time T4 expires in txfax because
 apparently rxfax is not sending a response back out, and thus after the
 maximum message retries (3) txfax just drops the call, leading rxfax to
 say that the call was dropped prematurely.
 
 does anyone know what's going on here, and if there is a version of
 spandsp which could work in this scenario ?
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
 
 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Do you have any timing issues such as slips or bi-polar violations
taking place. It sounds like there are dropped packets or something.

dave




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] (txfax+spandsp) fax is successfully sent, but Asterisk keeps sending DelayedRetries.

2007-09-06 Thread Pirlouwi
Hello
my current test is to send a fax to an analog fax (# is 5656) using the
Asterisk spooler.

I created this file which I copied into /var/spool/asterisk/outgoing
directory:

# fax_out.call
Channel: Zap/4/5656
MaxRetries: 50
RetryTime: 60
WaitTime: 45
Application: txfax
Data: /tmp/test.tif|caller


The fax was successfully sent, immediately. But after this successfully
sending, Asterisk keeps retrying to send this file. The fax_out.call file do
not disappear from the spool directory, but some messages are added to the
end of the .call file, like this:

Channel: Zap/4/5656
MaxRetries: 50
RetryTime: 60
WaitTime: 45
Application: txfax
Data: /tmp/test.tif|caller


StartRetry: 13740 1 (1189086695)

DelayedRetry: 13740 0 (1189086756)

DelayedRetry: 13740 0 (1189086817)




Any idea how to correct that?
The fact that the call file is removed from the spool/outgoing directory,
does it automatically means that the sending was successful?

_Pirlouwi
___

Sign up now for AstriCon 2007!  September 25-28th.  http://www.astricon.net/ 

--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] txfax and result

2007-03-29 Thread Giedrius Augys

Hi,
I have created mail to fax with txfax. I send faxes successfully. But I
want to know, is it possible to get result from txfax and what are solutions
to do this? For example, if fax send is unsuccessfully,  the user will get
email, that fax was unsuccessfully.

Thanks
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] txfax only getting 1 page of 3.

2006-10-24 Thread Jerry Geis

Steve and everyone...

I am using spandsp snapshot from oct 12, 2006. I am using asterisk 1.2.13.

When I am sending faxes I am only getting partial pages.

Internally using an IAXY connected to the fax machine I get 1 page of 3.

Extenally to a fax service using TDM2401E card I get the same results.
Only partial pages for my fax. 1 or 2 pages of my 3 page fax.

exten = smvoice_faxout,1,txfax(${SMFAXFILE},caller,debug)

This is my fax line and I am not getting any debug information that I see.

Why am I only getting partial pages? My machine is 97% idle.

Thanks,

Jerry

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] txfax reliability on TDM cards

2006-09-28 Thread Jerry Geis




Hi all,

What is the reliability of sending faxes with txfax?
I am sending a 4 page fax. I have received 1 and 2 pages
but never the whole thing?

Do I have to have T1 or something different to reliably 
send faxes with a TDM card?

Jerry




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


SV: [asterisk-users] txfax reliability on TDM cards

2006-09-28 Thread Jon Schøpzinsky








Hello



Use IAXmodem+hylafax instead. It works a
lot more stable than rxfax and txfax. Probably something to do with hylafax
being more accepting of errors.



Jon











Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Jerry Geis
Sendt: 28. september 2006 15:51
Til: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Emne: [asterisk-users] txfax
reliability on TDM cards





Hi all,

What is the reliability of sending faxes with txfax?
I am sending a 4 page fax. I have received 1 and 2 pages
but never the whole thing?

Do I have to have T1 or something different to reliably 
send faxes with a TDM card?

Jerry








--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/457 - Release Date: 26-09-2006
 

  

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/457 - Release Date: 26-09-2006
 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] txfax question

2006-09-27 Thread Jerry Geis

I am playing with txfax. I have gotten a fax to send which is great.

However now I am creating a multipage fax, I can view all the pages with 
viewfax (mgetty-viewfax package)

but when I fax it with txfax I only get 1 page

Any ideas there?

Jerry

I basically do:
gs -q -sDEVICE=tiffg3 -sPAPERSIZE=a4 -r204x196 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH 
-sOutputFile=/tmp/file.g3 file1.pdf file2.pdf


when I viewfax /tmp/file.g3 I see all the pages.




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[asterisk-users] TxFax

2006-07-18 Thread Giordano Grandis



Hi 
all,
I'm using spandsp 
0.0.2pre21 with tiff 3.7.1 and asterisk 1.0.9
With rxfax 
application, everythinghs is ok, but when i try to send a fax whit txfax 
applicationthe channel got hangup. I'm testing send fax towards an ATA 
grandstrem 488, but if i sent it to a normal fax i got the same 
error.
This is what 
happen:

 
-- Executing TxFAX("Zap/1-1", "/fax07182006190657.tif|caller|debug") in new 
stackFLOW Slow carrier upFLOW Slow carrier downFLOW Slow carrier 
upFLOW  NSF: 20 ad 00 36 20 00 00 00 00FLOW NSF without 
final frame tagFLOW The remote was made by 'HP'FLOW  CSI: 40 
37 37 34 39 35 34 34 20 35 38 30 20 39 33 2b 20 20 20 20 20FLOW CSI without 
final frame tagFLOW Remote fax gave CSI as: "+39 085 4459477"FLOW 
 DIS: 80 00 ee f8 c4 80 92 80 80 98 00FLOW DIS with final frame 
tagFLOW In state 10FLOW ???:FLOW 3rd generation mobile 
networkFLOW V.8 capableFLOW Prefer 64 octet 
blocksFLOW Reserved: 0x98FLOW Supported data 
signalling rates: V.29FLOW R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 
200x200pels/25.4mmFLOW 2D codingFLOW Scan line 
length: 215mmFLOW Recording length: A4 
(297mm)FLOW Receiver's minimum scan line time: 20ms at 3.85 
l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85FLOW Uncompressed modeFLOW 
Reserved: 0x10FLOW Minimum scan line time for higher 
resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7FLOW Binary file transfer 
(BFT)FLOW Reserved: 1FLOW ???:FLOW Prefer 
256 octet blocksFLOW Reserved: 0x80FLOW 
Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter fallback modeFLOW 2D 
codingFLOW Scan line length: 215mmFLOW Recording 
length: A4 (297mm)FLOW Receiver's minimum scan line time: 20ms 
at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85FLOW Start sending documentTIFFOpen: 
/fax07182006190657.tif: Cannot open.FLOW Cannot open source TIFF file 
'/fax07182006190657.tif'FLOW DIS nothing to send [0]FLOW 
???:FLOW Real-time Internet fax (T.38)FLOW V.8 
capableFLOW Prefer 64 octet blocksFLOW Reserved: 
0x90FLOW Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter fallback 
modeFLOW 2D codingFLOW Scan line length: 
215mmFLOW Recording length: A4 (297mm)FLOW 
Receiver's minimum scan line time: 20ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = 
T3.85FLOW Reserved: 0x1FLOW Minimum scan line 
time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7FLOW Character 
modeFLOW Reserved: 0x10FLOW DIS nothing to receive 
[0]FLOW Changed from phase 2 to 4FLOW  DCN: fbFLOW HDLC 
underflow in state 2FLOW DisconnectingFLOW Changed from phase 4 to 
7FLOW Changed from phase 7 to 8 == Spawn extension (incoming, 
X, 2) exited non-zero on 'Zap/2-1' -- Hungup 
'Zap/2-1' -- Channel 0/1, span 1 got 
hangup -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1'
I'm going to check 
it towards several fax, but i think i will get the same 
problem.
Anyone can help 
me?

Thanks very 
much

Giordano
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax tiff file format

2006-04-09 Thread Mohammad Shokuie

Dear folks,

I got a problem sending faxes using spandsp. Primerily, when the tiff file 
made using GIMP 2 with different compresions the fax app break downs whole 
*. Moreover when i made a tiff file using Microsoft mdi, everything works 
fine but on the other end of the call, the received fax is shrinked in size. 
Anyone has any idea whats the right file format and compression type for it?


PS. Im using libtiff-3.7.1-2 and spandsp-0.0.2-pre25

Regards.
---
M. Shokuie Nia

_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax problem

2006-03-27 Thread James Hawks



I can not get txfax to work with a multiple page 
tiff image. It works fine with a single page tiff image. Has anyone had this 
problem before and if so is there a fix?


Thank You,James HawksCTO 
CustomerFunding.com Inc.(877) 784-1030 
x206
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] txfax problem

2006-03-27 Thread Technical Support



James,

Which fax application are you 
using?

MD


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James 
HawksSent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:29 PMTo: 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: [Asterisk-Users] txfax 
problem

I can not get txfax to work with a multiple page 
tiff image. It works fine with a single page tiff image. Has anyone had this 
problem before and if so is there a fix? 


Thank You,James HawksCTO 
CustomerFunding.com Inc.(877) 784-1030 
x206
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax problem

2006-03-27 Thread James Hawks



I am using Asterfax but I also tried the following 
with the same results:

[macro-testfax]exten = 
s,1,Set(FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/QWWWxx1.tif))exten = 
s,2,txfax(${FAXFILE}|caller)

[default]exten = 7001,1,Answerexten 
= 7001,n,Dial(ZAP/97/94805175098|30|gM(testfax))exten = 
7001,n,Hangupexten = 7001,102,Congestion


I did this to see if Asterfax was the problem or it 
was txfax. It seems to be txfax or the tif file. I also tried using a fax 
machine attached to my asterisk server and the fax went through with no problems 
so that eliminated a hardware issue with my Digium cards.


Thank You,James HawksCTO CustomerFunding.com Inc.(877) 784-1030 
x206

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Technical Support 
  
  To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - 
  Non-Commercial Discussion' 
  Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 4:31 
PM
  Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] txfax 
  problem
  
  James,
  
  Which fax application are you 
  using?
  
  MD
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James 
  HawksSent: Monday, March 27, 2006 5:29 PMTo: asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSubject: 
  [Asterisk-Users] txfax problem
  
  I can not get txfax to work with a multiple page 
  tiff image. It works fine with a single page tiff image. Has anyone had this 
  problem before and if so is there a fix? 
  
  
  Thank You,James HawksCTO 
  CustomerFunding.com Inc.(877) 784-1030 x206
  
  

  ___--Bandwidth and 
  Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing 
  listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

2006-01-30 Thread Allan Gee
I wonder if anyone can tell me which version of spandsp is used in iaxmodem?
I would like to use the app_rxfax application WITH iaxmodem.

Regards Allan Gee
Phone: +27 21 4644400 Ext. 103
www.equation.co.za


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Philip
Edelbrock
Sent: 26 January 2006 02:32 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem




Jeff Herring wrote:
 would you care to share with the list your installation procedure
 and configuration files associated with your iaxmodem and hylafax
 installation alongside asterisk?

Sure!  Some things, I'm sure, could use improvement, but this is working 
for me:

Get iaxmodem: https://sourceforge.net/projects/iaxmodem

You need libiax2 and spandsp-0.0.3 (yes, the devel one not the other 
installed.  Both are included in iaxmodem (in the lib directory), 
however I grabbed a slightly newer spandsp-0.0.3 from the spandsp site.

Make sure spandsp and libiax2 are found by your system (usually by doing 
a 'ldconfig').

Build and install iaxmodem.

iaxmodem wants a config file at /etc/iaxmode-cfg.something.  Mine looks 
something like:

# cat /etc/iaxmodem-cfg.ttyIAX

device  /dev/ttyIAX
port4569
refresh 60
server  YOUR.SERVER.IP.HERE
peernameiaxmodem
secret  YOUR_SECRET_HERE
cidname John Doe
cidnumber   8005551212
codec   slinear
swapbytes   true

Now, create an entry for the iax channel in your Asterisk config.  Mine 
looks something like this (in iax.conf):

[iaxmodem]
type=friend
username=iaxmodem
secret=YOUR_SECRET_HERE
context=faxout
host=dynamic
auth=md5,plaintext,rsa

Notice that the context is 'faxout' in my extensions.conf.  Here's what 
the relevent contexts are in my extensions.conf:

[fax]
exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/iaxmodem)

[faxout]
exten = _.,1,Dial(Zap/g2/${EXTEN})

Notice I also have 'fax' which is incoming.  That's a context for my zap 
channel (a dedicated fax line).  From zapata.conf:

group = 2
faxdetect=both
faxdetect=incoming
faxdetect=outgoing
faxdetect=yes
rxgain=0.0
txgain=0.0
context=fax
channel = 4

OK, what this all does thus far: It sets up a serial port, /dev/ttyIAX 
in this case, which looks like a fax-modem that is connected to the 
provided iax channel.  You can point minicom at it and play with it if 
you want.  Calls coming into Zap-4 will automaticly go to iaxmodem and 
'ring' on the /dev/ttyIAX serial device.  Faxes going out on iaxmodem 
automatically go our on the same Zap channel (although doesn't have to).

Now, run iaxmodem (e.g. iaxmodem ttyIAX), after you've already got 
asterisk going, to get it registered.  Make sure it registers and things 
look OK (iax2 show peers).  You could even try to call it or dial out w/ 
  minicom (using /dev/ttyIAX as the modem device).

Now, you can set up hylafax.  I installed from RPM, which was pretty 
easy following the directions.  Run through its set up and get the email 
addresses and those relevent things set.  Instead of setting up a new 
modem config, however, I edited and then copied the supplied one out of 
the iaxmodex distro (config.ttyIAX).

Get hylafax going (/etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax start).

Now, here's the only stumbling block that I had: In order for things to 
work, faxgetty needs to be running!  The hylafax service doesn't do this 
for you, you need to set it up yourself.  The easiest way is to add it 
to your /etc/inittab. I added it to mine like this (the new line is the 
last here, the rest were already there and included for context):

# Run gettys in standard runlevels
1:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty1
2:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty2
3:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty3
4:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty4
5:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty5
6:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty6
7:2345:respawn:/usr/sbin/faxgetty ttyIAX

You may need to restart or 'telinit q' or something to get the changes 
noticed by init.

Now you can try sending and receiving faxes.  For fun, I created a new 
account on the Asterisk server and put a .procmailrc file there which 
passes emails to that account to hylafax:

SUBJECT=`formail -xSubject:`

:0 c
* ^Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|/usr/bin/faxmail -d $SUBJECT


How it works: send a mail to the account and in the subject line put 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and it will fax the email to 555-1234 with 'attn Joe' on 
the cover page.  Slick... although it seems to take more work to convert 
non-text (e.g. images), which I haven't attempted yet.

OK, so there's the crash course.  I hope it helps.


Phil
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list

Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

2006-01-30 Thread Lee Howard

Allan Gee wrote:


I wonder if anyone can tell me which version of spandsp is used in iaxmodem?
 



IAXmodem version 0.0.8 uses spandsp development snapshot 20051220... so 
it's 0.0.3, more recent than pre6.



I would like to use the app_rxfax application WITH iaxmodem.



This will be possible so long as you can get both app_rxfax and iaxmodem 
to function properly with the same spandsp installation... or unless you 
can get each to use a different installation of spandsp.


That said, there should be no functionality in app_rxfax that you would 
miss in using IAXmodem+HylaFAX.


Lee.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

2006-01-25 Thread Jeff Herring

would you care to share with the list your installation procedure
and configuration files associated with your iaxmodem and hylafax
installation alongside asterisk?

At 01:07 PM 1/24/2006, Philip Edelbrock wrote:

iaxmodem + hylafax worked much better for me.  Seems solid where 
txfax/rxfax was very iffy.  Thus far, I'm just using it with Zap lines, though.



Phil

Technical Support wrote:

Downgrade your spandsp.  Do some reading on spandsp first!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allan Gee
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:36 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem
Nobody seems to use txfax or does nobody have any problems with it?
I have sent mails to most lists and get no reply.
I cannot get a fax to go through with txfax.
I use a call file as a test and all I get on the receiving fax is a bunch of
vertical lines.
my call file is:
Channel:Srx/gout/4658158
MaxRetries: 0
WaitTime: 20
Application:txfax
Data:/etc/asterisk/testfax.tif|caller|debug
FYI tiffinfo on file is:
TIFF Directory at offset 0x733e
  Image Width: 1728 Image Length: 1161
  Resolution: 77, 38.5 pixels/cm
  Bits/Sample: 1
  Compression Scheme: CCITT Group 3
  Photometric Interpretation: min-is-white
  FillOrder: lsb-to-msb
  Date  Time: 2006/01/11 18:06:14
  Host Computer: asterisk.equation.co.za
  Orientation: row 0 top, col 0 lhs
  Samples/Pixel: 1
  Rows/Strip: (infinite)
  Planar Configuration: single image plane
  Page Number: 0-1
  Software: spandsp
  Group 3 Options: 2-d encoding+EOL padding (5 = 0x5)
  Fax Data: clean (0 = 0x0)
  Fax Receive Time: 29 secs
what is going on here?
I have used latest spandsp-0.0.3pre23 with it's app_txfax.c and tiff-3.7.1
from source I have also used just about every other spandsp and libtiff
combo but no joy with sending the faxes.
PLEASE HELP!!

Regards Allan Gee
Phone: +27 21 4644400 Ext. 103
www.equation.co.za

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

2006-01-25 Thread Philip Edelbrock



Jeff Herring wrote:

would you care to share with the list your installation procedure
and configuration files associated with your iaxmodem and hylafax
installation alongside asterisk?


Sure!  Some things, I'm sure, could use improvement, but this is working 
for me:


Get iaxmodem: https://sourceforge.net/projects/iaxmodem

You need libiax2 and spandsp-0.0.3 (yes, the devel one not the other 
installed.  Both are included in iaxmodem (in the lib directory), 
however I grabbed a slightly newer spandsp-0.0.3 from the spandsp site.


Make sure spandsp and libiax2 are found by your system (usually by doing 
a 'ldconfig').


Build and install iaxmodem.

iaxmodem wants a config file at /etc/iaxmode-cfg.something.  Mine looks 
something like:


# cat /etc/iaxmodem-cfg.ttyIAX

device  /dev/ttyIAX
port4569
refresh 60
server  YOUR.SERVER.IP.HERE
peernameiaxmodem
secret  YOUR_SECRET_HERE
cidname John Doe
cidnumber   8005551212
codec   slinear
swapbytes   true

Now, create an entry for the iax channel in your Asterisk config.  Mine 
looks something like this (in iax.conf):


[iaxmodem]
type=friend
username=iaxmodem
secret=YOUR_SECRET_HERE
context=faxout
host=dynamic
auth=md5,plaintext,rsa

Notice that the context is 'faxout' in my extensions.conf.  Here's what 
the relevent contexts are in my extensions.conf:


[fax]
exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/iaxmodem)

[faxout]
exten = _.,1,Dial(Zap/g2/${EXTEN})

Notice I also have 'fax' which is incoming.  That's a context for my zap 
channel (a dedicated fax line).  From zapata.conf:


group = 2
faxdetect=both
faxdetect=incoming
faxdetect=outgoing
faxdetect=yes
rxgain=0.0
txgain=0.0
context=fax
channel = 4

OK, what this all does thus far: It sets up a serial port, /dev/ttyIAX 
in this case, which looks like a fax-modem that is connected to the 
provided iax channel.  You can point minicom at it and play with it if 
you want.  Calls coming into Zap-4 will automaticly go to iaxmodem and 
'ring' on the /dev/ttyIAX serial device.  Faxes going out on iaxmodem 
automatically go our on the same Zap channel (although doesn't have to).


Now, run iaxmodem (e.g. iaxmodem ttyIAX), after you've already got 
asterisk going, to get it registered.  Make sure it registers and things 
look OK (iax2 show peers).  You could even try to call it or dial out w/ 
 minicom (using /dev/ttyIAX as the modem device).


Now, you can set up hylafax.  I installed from RPM, which was pretty 
easy following the directions.  Run through its set up and get the email 
addresses and those relevent things set.  Instead of setting up a new 
modem config, however, I edited and then copied the supplied one out of 
the iaxmodex distro (config.ttyIAX).


Get hylafax going (/etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax start).

Now, here's the only stumbling block that I had: In order for things to 
work, faxgetty needs to be running!  The hylafax service doesn't do this 
for you, you need to set it up yourself.  The easiest way is to add it 
to your /etc/inittab. I added it to mine like this (the new line is the 
last here, the rest were already there and included for context):


# Run gettys in standard runlevels
1:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty1
2:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty2
3:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty3
4:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty4
5:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty5
6:2345:respawn:/sbin/mingetty tty6
7:2345:respawn:/usr/sbin/faxgetty ttyIAX

You may need to restart or 'telinit q' or something to get the changes 
noticed by init.


Now you can try sending and receiving faxes.  For fun, I created a new 
account on the Asterisk server and put a .procmailrc file there which 
passes emails to that account to hylafax:


SUBJECT=`formail -xSubject:`

:0 c
* ^Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|/usr/bin/faxmail -d $SUBJECT


How it works: send a mail to the account and in the subject line put 
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and it will fax the email to 555-1234 with 'attn Joe' on 
the cover page.  Slick... although it seems to take more work to convert 
non-text (e.g. images), which I haven't attempted yet.


OK, so there's the crash course.  I hope it helps.


Phil
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

2006-01-24 Thread Allan Gee
Nobody seems to use txfax or does nobody have any problems with it?
I have sent mails to most lists and get no reply.
I cannot get a fax to go through with txfax.
I use a call file as a test and all I get on the receiving fax is a bunch of 
vertical lines.

my call file is:

Channel:Srx/gout/4658158
MaxRetries: 0
WaitTime: 20
Application:txfax
Data:/etc/asterisk/testfax.tif|caller|debug

FYI tiffinfo on file is:

TIFF Directory at offset 0x733e
  Image Width: 1728 Image Length: 1161
  Resolution: 77, 38.5 pixels/cm
  Bits/Sample: 1
  Compression Scheme: CCITT Group 3
  Photometric Interpretation: min-is-white
  FillOrder: lsb-to-msb
  Date  Time: 2006/01/11 18:06:14
  Host Computer: asterisk.equation.co.za
  Orientation: row 0 top, col 0 lhs
  Samples/Pixel: 1
  Rows/Strip: (infinite)
  Planar Configuration: single image plane
  Page Number: 0-1
  Software: spandsp
  Group 3 Options: 2-d encoding+EOL padding (5 = 0x5)
  Fax Data: clean (0 = 0x0)
  Fax Receive Time: 29 secs

what is going on here?
I have used latest spandsp-0.0.3pre23 with it's app_txfax.c and tiff-3.7.1 from 
source
I have also used just about every other spandsp and libtiff combo but no joy 
with sending the faxes.

PLEASE HELP!!


Regards Allan Gee
Phone: +27 21 4644400 Ext. 103
www.equation.co.za
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

2006-01-24 Thread Technical Support
Downgrade your spandsp.  Do some reading on spandsp first! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allan Gee
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:36 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

Nobody seems to use txfax or does nobody have any problems with it?
I have sent mails to most lists and get no reply.
I cannot get a fax to go through with txfax.
I use a call file as a test and all I get on the receiving fax is a bunch of
vertical lines.

my call file is:

Channel:Srx/gout/4658158
MaxRetries: 0
WaitTime: 20
Application:txfax
Data:/etc/asterisk/testfax.tif|caller|debug

FYI tiffinfo on file is:

TIFF Directory at offset 0x733e
  Image Width: 1728 Image Length: 1161
  Resolution: 77, 38.5 pixels/cm
  Bits/Sample: 1
  Compression Scheme: CCITT Group 3
  Photometric Interpretation: min-is-white
  FillOrder: lsb-to-msb
  Date  Time: 2006/01/11 18:06:14
  Host Computer: asterisk.equation.co.za
  Orientation: row 0 top, col 0 lhs
  Samples/Pixel: 1
  Rows/Strip: (infinite)
  Planar Configuration: single image plane
  Page Number: 0-1
  Software: spandsp
  Group 3 Options: 2-d encoding+EOL padding (5 = 0x5)
  Fax Data: clean (0 = 0x0)
  Fax Receive Time: 29 secs

what is going on here?
I have used latest spandsp-0.0.3pre23 with it's app_txfax.c and tiff-3.7.1
from source I have also used just about every other spandsp and libtiff
combo but no joy with sending the faxes.

PLEASE HELP!!


Regards Allan Gee
Phone: +27 21 4644400 Ext. 103
www.equation.co.za


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

2006-01-24 Thread Philip Edelbrock


iaxmodem + hylafax worked much better for me.  Seems solid where 
txfax/rxfax was very iffy.  Thus far, I'm just using it with Zap lines, 
though.



Phil

Technical Support wrote:
Downgrade your spandsp.  Do some reading on spandsp first! 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allan Gee
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:36 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

Nobody seems to use txfax or does nobody have any problems with it?
I have sent mails to most lists and get no reply.
I cannot get a fax to go through with txfax.
I use a call file as a test and all I get on the receiving fax is a bunch of
vertical lines.

my call file is:

Channel:Srx/gout/4658158
MaxRetries: 0
WaitTime: 20
Application:txfax
Data:/etc/asterisk/testfax.tif|caller|debug

FYI tiffinfo on file is:

TIFF Directory at offset 0x733e
  Image Width: 1728 Image Length: 1161
  Resolution: 77, 38.5 pixels/cm
  Bits/Sample: 1
  Compression Scheme: CCITT Group 3
  Photometric Interpretation: min-is-white
  FillOrder: lsb-to-msb
  Date  Time: 2006/01/11 18:06:14
  Host Computer: asterisk.equation.co.za
  Orientation: row 0 top, col 0 lhs
  Samples/Pixel: 1
  Rows/Strip: (infinite)
  Planar Configuration: single image plane
  Page Number: 0-1
  Software: spandsp
  Group 3 Options: 2-d encoding+EOL padding (5 = 0x5)
  Fax Data: clean (0 = 0x0)
  Fax Receive Time: 29 secs

what is going on here?
I have used latest spandsp-0.0.3pre23 with it's app_txfax.c and tiff-3.7.1
from source I have also used just about every other spandsp and libtiff
combo but no joy with sending the faxes.

PLEASE HELP!!


Regards Allan Gee
Phone: +27 21 4644400 Ext. 103
www.equation.co.za


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

2006-01-24 Thread Ben Higley

i second the iaxmodem + hylafax...

It has worked from day 1 with no problems.

I have been using Cypheus as the client to send things out and they make
their way.  Hylafax handles the res-schedule and notification.

I saw an update to asterfax, that would be good as an email-fax gateway. I
haven't dove down far enough if there is a link with hylafax with asterfax

ben


 iaxmodem + hylafax worked much better for me.  Seems solid where
 txfax/rxfax was very iffy.  Thus far, I'm just using it with Zap lines,
 though.


 Phil

 Technical Support wrote:
 Downgrade your spandsp.  Do some reading on spandsp first!

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allan Gee
 Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:36 AM
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

 Nobody seems to use txfax or does nobody have any problems with it?
 I have sent mails to most lists and get no reply.
 I cannot get a fax to go through with txfax.
 I use a call file as a test and all I get on the receiving fax is a
 bunch of
 vertical lines.

 my call file is:

 Channel:Srx/gout/4658158
 MaxRetries: 0
 WaitTime: 20
 Application:txfax
 Data:/etc/asterisk/testfax.tif|caller|debug

 FYI tiffinfo on file is:

 TIFF Directory at offset 0x733e
   Image Width: 1728 Image Length: 1161
   Resolution: 77, 38.5 pixels/cm
   Bits/Sample: 1
   Compression Scheme: CCITT Group 3
   Photometric Interpretation: min-is-white
   FillOrder: lsb-to-msb
   Date  Time: 2006/01/11 18:06:14
   Host Computer: asterisk.equation.co.za
   Orientation: row 0 top, col 0 lhs
   Samples/Pixel: 1
   Rows/Strip: (infinite)
   Planar Configuration: single image plane
   Page Number: 0-1
   Software: spandsp
   Group 3 Options: 2-d encoding+EOL padding (5 = 0x5)
   Fax Data: clean (0 = 0x0)
   Fax Receive Time: 29 secs

 what is going on here?
 I have used latest spandsp-0.0.3pre23 with it's app_txfax.c and
 tiff-3.7.1
 from source I have also used just about every other spandsp and libtiff
 combo but no joy with sending the faxes.

 PLEASE HELP!!


 Regards Allan Gee
 Phone: +27 21 4644400 Ext. 103
 www.equation.co.za


 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

2006-01-24 Thread Technical Support
The docs for spandsp say that 0.0.3 is purely experimental/developmental.
Don't expect it to work!  (I would be surprised if you got everything to
compile without warnings).  Stick with the latest in the 0.0.2 family.

After that, you would have to follow a logical diagnostic process and post
relevant data.  Based on your previous posts, I don't even know if asterisk
is complaining about the call file during fax out (no debug logs) etc.

Post all the relevant details and you'll find the list very helpful!  If you
have not paid attention to compile warnings, mixed library versions, etc.,
you may have to pay someone to go onto your system to untangle the mess (or
post your problems and analysis one step at a time).

Michelle

-Original Message-
From: Allan Gee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 12:06 PM
To: Technical Support
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

Thanks for the tip but if I am using Asterisk 1.2.X I can ONLY use
spandsp-0.0.2pre21 and up.
The earlier ones don't compile against 1.2.X

I have done reading spandsp docs and nowhere does it say what works and what
does not.
Which version of spandsp/asterisk works for you?

Regards Allan Gee
Phone: +27 21 4644400 Ext. 103
www.equation.co.za


-Original Message-
From: Technical Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 January 2006 06:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial
Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem


Downgrade your spandsp.  Do some reading on spandsp first! 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allan Gee
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:36 AM
To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] txfax application problem

Nobody seems to use txfax or does nobody have any problems with it?
I have sent mails to most lists and get no reply.
I cannot get a fax to go through with txfax.
I use a call file as a test and all I get on the receiving fax is a bunch of
vertical lines.

my call file is:

Channel:Srx/gout/4658158
MaxRetries: 0
WaitTime: 20
Application:txfax
Data:/etc/asterisk/testfax.tif|caller|debug

FYI tiffinfo on file is:

TIFF Directory at offset 0x733e
  Image Width: 1728 Image Length: 1161
  Resolution: 77, 38.5 pixels/cm
  Bits/Sample: 1
  Compression Scheme: CCITT Group 3
  Photometric Interpretation: min-is-white
  FillOrder: lsb-to-msb
  Date  Time: 2006/01/11 18:06:14
  Host Computer: asterisk.equation.co.za
  Orientation: row 0 top, col 0 lhs
  Samples/Pixel: 1
  Rows/Strip: (infinite)
  Planar Configuration: single image plane
  Page Number: 0-1
  Software: spandsp
  Group 3 Options: 2-d encoding+EOL padding (5 = 0x5)
  Fax Data: clean (0 = 0x0)
  Fax Receive Time: 29 secs

what is going on here?
I have used latest spandsp-0.0.3pre23 with it's app_txfax.c and tiff-3.7.1
from source I have also used just about every other spandsp and libtiff
combo but no joy with sending the faxes.

PLEASE HELP!!


Regards Allan Gee
Phone: +27 21 4644400 Ext. 103
www.equation.co.za




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax and rxfax problem with spandsp 0.0.2pre21c and 1.2rc1

2005-11-12 Thread John Covici
I am getting the same with cvs head as of today.

on Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:29:05 -0600 Anton Krall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Steve!

 I tried compiling the recent spandsp 0.0.2pre21c with 1.2rc1 and I also
 compiled unicall for r2mfc support.

 R2mfc seems to be working great! But when I load everything up I get this on
 the CLI:

 Nov 10 15:28:49 WARNING[26895]: loader.c:325 __load_resource:
 /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_rxfax.so: undefined symbol:
 fax_set_phase_d_handler

 And rxfax/txfax doesn't load and coredumps asterisk.

 Any ideas? Is there any relation or problem if you use unicall and txfax at
 the same time?

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

 John Covici
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax and rxfax problem with spandsp 0.0.2pre21c and 1.2rc1

2005-11-10 Thread Anton Krall
Hi Steve!

I tried compiling the recent spandsp 0.0.2pre21c with 1.2rc1 and I also
compiled unicall for r2mfc support.

R2mfc seems to be working great! But when I load everything up I get this on
the CLI:

Nov 10 15:28:49 WARNING[26895]: loader.c:325 __load_resource:
/usr/lib/asterisk/modules/app_rxfax.so: undefined symbol:
fax_set_phase_d_handler

And rxfax/txfax doesn't load and coredumps asterisk.

Any ideas? Is there any relation or problem if you use unicall and txfax at
the same time?

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax (app_txfax) sending issue

2005-10-07 Thread JC van der Walt

Hi All,

With spandsp.0.0.2 pre20 installed I can't seem to send faxes with 
tx_fax over a Zap channel (POTS). rx_fax works just fine so no issues 
with libtiff and (presumably) libxml2.


Basically I get 'slow carrier up' and 'slow carrier down' together with 
accompanying beeping noises until tx_fax times out and hangs up.  This 
could quite possibly be a PEBKAC or n00b problem since I'm relatively 
new to Asterisk.


- snippet: extensions.conf -

exten = _8NXX,1,Set(FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/sendfax.tif)
exten = _8NXX,2,Set(LOCALHEADERINFO=Company name and department)
exten = _8NXX,3,Set(LOCALSTATIONID=Company name)
exten = _8NXX,4,TXFAX(${FAXFILE}|caller)

- // extensions.conf -


- snippet: * console -

*CLI -- Executing Set(SIP/rec1pub1-af67, 
FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/sendfax.tif) in new stack
   -- Executing Set(SIP/rec1pub1-af67, LOCALHEADERINFO=Company name 
and department) in new stack
   -- Executing Set(SIP/rec1pub1-af67, LOCALSTATIONID=Company name) 
in new stack
   -- Executing TxFAX(SIP/rec1pub1-af67, 
/var/spool/asterisk/fax/sendfax.tif|caller) in new stack

Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
...

- // * console -


Could anyone tell me what I might be missing or what I have to look for?

Thanks in advance.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] TXFAX

2005-09-19 Thread Il Neofita
Hi,
do you know what it means the following:

 Call failed to go through, reason 3


I received it when I try to send a FAX and no one answer it.

Thank you
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] TXFAX

2005-09-19 Thread Damon Estep








This is a wild guess, but maybe it means
no one answered!













From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Il Neofita
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005
8:22 AM
To: Asterisk
 Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TXFAX





Hi,
do you know what it means the following:
Call failed to go through, reason 3 

I received it when I try to send a FAX and no one answer it.

Thank you








___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] TxFAX don't work

2005-09-15 Thread Michele \O-Zone\ Pinassi
As subject, (i've updated spandsp to latest version) and this is the log:

Sep 15 13:06:50 VERBOSE[14085]: -- Attempting call on Zap/g0/2479 for 
application txfax(/var/tmp/ast_fax-1126782409.10240.1804289383.0|caller) 
(Retry 1)
Sep 15 13:06:50 DEBUG[14085]: Using channel 1
Sep 15 13:06:50 DEBUG[14085]: Dialing '2479'
Sep 15 13:06:50 DEBUG[14085]: Deferring dialing...
Sep 15 13:06:50 DEBUG[14085]: Exception on 18, channel 1
Sep 15 13:06:50 DEBUG[14085]: Got event Hook Transition Complete(12) on 
channel 1 (index 0)
Sep 15 13:06:51 DEBUG[14085]: Exception on 18, channel 1
Sep 15 13:06:51 DEBUG[14085]: Got event Dial Complete(9) on channel 1 (index 
0)
Sep 15 13:06:51 DEBUG[14085]: Enabled echo cancellation on channel 1
Sep 15 13:06:51 DEBUG[14085]: Engaged echo training on channel 1
Sep 15 13:06:53 DEBUG[14085]: Exception on 18, channel 1
Sep 15 13:06:53 DEBUG[14085]: Got event Dial Complete(9) on channel 1 (index 
0)
Sep 15 13:06:53 DEBUG[14085]: Echo cancellation already on
Sep 15 13:06:53 DEBUG[14085]: Dropping duplicate answer!
Sep 15 13:06:53 VERBOSE[14085]: Channel Zap/1-1 was answered.
Sep 15 13:06:53 VERBOSE[14085]: Launching 
txfax(/var/tmp/ast_fax-1126782409.10240.1804289383.0|caller) on Zap/1-1
Sep 15 13:06:53 DEBUG[14085]: Set channel Zap/1-1 to read format slin
Sep 15 13:06:53 DEBUG[14085]: Set channel Zap/1-1 to write format slin
Sep 15 13:07:27 DEBUG[14085]: Set channel Zap/1-1 to read format ulaw
Sep 15 13:07:27 DEBUG[14085]: Set channel Zap/1-1 to write format ulaw
Sep 15 13:07:27 DEBUG[14085]: Hanging up channel 'Zap/1-1'
Sep 15 13:07:27 DEBUG[14085]: zt_hangup(Zap/1-1)
Sep 15 13:07:27 DEBUG[14085]: Hangup: channel: 1 index = 0, normal = 18, 
callwait = -1, thirdcall = -1
Sep 15 13:07:27 DEBUG[14085]: disabled echo cancellation on channel 1
Sep 15 13:07:27 DEBUG[14085]: Set option TDD MODE, value: OFF(0) on Zap/1-1
Sep 15 13:07:27 DEBUG[14085]: Updated conferencing on 1, with 0 conference 
users
Sep 15 13:07:27 VERBOSE[14085]: -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1'
Sep 15 13:07:27 NOTICE[14085]: Call completed to Zap/g0/2479

or remote FAX machine say Error receiving fax and line remaing stale.

Any help ?

-- 

O-Zone ! No (C) 2005
WEB @ http://www.zerozone.it
HOBBY @ http://peggy.altervista.org
Call me with FWD: 692329
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Txfax

2005-09-09 Thread Roger Schreiter

Chris Shipman schrieb:

What build of SpanDSP did you use?


spandsp-0.0.2pre18



 I'm working on a windows program
so users can print to a local printer which will be forwarded to the
asterisk server to be faxed.

So far the program FTPs a Tiff to the Asterisk server to be faxed with a
Sample.Call file.(For lack of a better method thus far)



I don't understand, what you are telling or asking us
with this information.

Has it something to do with your question? If not, please
avoid confusing with additional infos which are not relevant!

Roger.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Txfax

2005-09-09 Thread Luki
 I don't understand, what you are telling or asking us
 with this information. Has it something to do with your question? 
But others might understand... I do. Yes, it's related.

Essentially it's the equivalent of WHFC for Hylafax -- a Windows
client that will allow Windows users print from any program to a
virtual fax printer; Chris's program will then submit the job as a
TIFF to the asterisk server along with a call file. Here's the
relevant part: it's quite important to know if the fax went through or
not, and if it should be rescheduled for resending without (Windows)
user intervention.

Anyway, IMO Roger's hack is useful regardless and I'd be interested in
trying Chris's solution out once it's ready (and if he chooses to
share it).

--Luki
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Txfax

2005-09-09 Thread Chris Shipman
Thanks Luki,

Maybe it was the wrong place to mention it.

Back to the other matter: The program will create a PDF or tif. It
can submit the fax by FTP or by AstFax.
If someone is willing to develop a CGI/PERL script for HTTP submissions I
will integrate that into the program as well.

Since my program uses a lot of Open source programs I will release it
under the GPL as well.  I plan to test the faxing portions
next week.After I have some of the bugs worked out I will release the
program.


Regards,

Chris

- Original Message - 
From: Luki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Txfax


  I don't understand, what you are telling or asking us
  with this information. Has it something to do with your question?
 But others might understand... I do. Yes, it's related.

 Essentially it's the equivalent of WHFC for Hylafax -- a Windows
 client that will allow Windows users print from any program to a
 virtual fax printer; Chris's program will then submit the job as a
 TIFF to the asterisk server along with a call file. Here's the
 relevant part: it's quite important to know if the fax went through or
 not, and if it should be rescheduled for resending without (Windows)
 user intervention.

 Anyway, IMO Roger's hack is useful regardless and I'd be interested in
 trying Chris's solution out once it's ready (and if he chooses to
 share it).

 --Luki
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users




___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Txfax

2005-09-09 Thread Il Neofita
This is the script I do not remeber the name of the author

For me is working
On 9/9/05, Chris Shipman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Luki,Maybe it was the wrong place to mention it.Back to the other matter: The program will create a PDF or tif. Itcan submit the fax by FTP or by AstFax.If someone is willing to develop a CGI/PERL script for HTTP submissions I
will integrate that into the program as well.Since my program uses a lot of Open source programs I will release itunder the GPL as well.I plan to test the faxing portionsnext week.After I have some of the bugs worked out I will release the
program.Regards,Chris- Original Message -From: Luki [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSent: Friday, September 09, 2005 6:20 PMSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Txfax  I don't understand, what you are telling or asking us
  with this information. Has it something to do with your question? But others might understand... I do. Yes, it's related. Essentially it's the equivalent of WHFC for Hylafax -- a Windows
 client that will allow Windows users print from any program to a virtual fax printer; Chris's program will then submit the job as a TIFF to the asterisk server along with a call file. Here's the
 relevant part: it's quite important to know if the fax went through or not, and if it should be rescheduled for resending without (Windows) user intervention. Anyway, IMO Roger's hack is useful regardless and I'd be interested in
 trying Chris's solution out once it's ready (and if he chooses to share it). --Luki ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by 
Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


asterfax.0.22.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Txfax

2005-09-09 Thread Chris



 It doesn't say how to use 
it.


Chris



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Il 
  Neofita 
  To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - 
  Non-Commercial Discussion 
  Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 8:30 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Txfax
  This is the script I do not remeber the name of the 
  authorFor me is working
  On 9/9/05, Chris 
  Shipman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Thanks 
Luki,Maybe it was the wrong place to mention 
it.Back to the other matter: The program 
will create a PDF or tif. Itcan submit the fax 
by FTP or by AstFax.If someone is willing to develop a CGI/PERL script 
for HTTP submissions I will integrate that into the program as 
well.Since my program uses a lot of Open 
source programs I will release itunder the GPL as well.I 
plan to test the faxing portionsnext week.After 
I have some of the bugs worked out I will release the 
program.Regards,Chris- Original Message 
-From: "Luki" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: "Asterisk 
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" asterisk-users@lists.digium.comSent: 
Friday, September 09, 2005 6:20 PMSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 
Txfax  I don't understand, what you are telling or 
asking us   with this information. Has it something to do with 
your question? But others might understand... I do. Yes, it's 
related. Essentially it's the equivalent of WHFC for Hylafax 
-- a Windows  client that will allow Windows users print from any 
program to a virtual fax printer; Chris's program will then submit 
the job as a TIFF to the asterisk server along with a call file. 
Here's the relevant part: it's quite important to know if the fax 
went through or not, and if it should be rescheduled for resending 
without (Windows) user intervention. Anyway, IMO 
Roger's hack is useful regardless and I'd be interested in  trying 
Chris's solution out once it's ready (and if he chooses to share 
it). --Luki 
___ --Bandwidth and 
Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com 
-- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com 
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
___--Bandwidth 
and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com 
--Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo 
UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  

  ___--Bandwidth and 
  Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing 
  listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo 
  UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: 
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Txfax

2005-09-08 Thread Il Neofita
Is theresome way to know if the fax was received correctly or not?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Txfax

2005-09-08 Thread Roger Schreiter

Il Neofita schrieb:

Is there some way to know if the fax was received correctly or not?



Hi,

after also having asked here some days ago without an answer,
I assume, there is currently no way.

Thus, I started to study a little bit the source code.
Maybe I found a solution, which will work.

I haven't yet understood the whole souce, so I don't know,
whether my solution was silly or not or whether my solution
is reliable or not.

For me it is working great, but use with care!


Roger.



My proposal for a fax-send-success-feedback:

1. Look in txfax.c (approx line 60) for the function
   static void phase_e_handler(t30_state_t *s 

2. Add some code, which writes the number of successfully sent pages to
   an channel variable:

static void phase_e_handler(t30_state_t *s, void *user_data, int result)
{
   struct ast_channel *chan;
   char far_ident[21];
   char minibuf[11];new line

   chan = (struct ast_channel *) user_data;
   if (result)
   {
 fax_get_far_ident(s, far_ident);
 pbx_builtin_setvar_helper(chan, REMOTESTATIONID, far_ident);
 sprintf(minibuf, %d, s-t4.pages_transferred);  new
 pbx_builtin_setvar_helper(chan, FAX_PAGES_TRANSFERRED, minibuf);
   new


Then you'll find the variable ${FAX_PAGES_TRANSFERRED} accessible from
the dialplan.
If you know the number of pages to be sent, you can compare and see if
complete.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Txfax

2005-09-08 Thread Chris Shipman
What build of SpanDSP did you use?  I'm working on a windows program
so users can print to a local printer which will be forwarded to the
asterisk server to be faxed.

So far the program FTPs a Tiff to the Asterisk server to be faxed with a
Sample.Call file.(For lack of a better method thus far)


Regards,


Chris

- Original Message - 
From: Roger Schreiter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Txfax


 Il Neofita schrieb:
  Is there some way to know if the fax was received correctly or not?


 Hi,

 after also having asked here some days ago without an answer,
 I assume, there is currently no way.

 Thus, I started to study a little bit the source code.
 Maybe I found a solution, which will work.

 I haven't yet understood the whole souce, so I don't know,
 whether my solution was silly or not or whether my solution
 is reliable or not.

 For me it is working great, but use with care!


 Roger.



 My proposal for a fax-send-success-feedback:

 1. Look in txfax.c (approx line 60) for the function
 static void phase_e_handler(t30_state_t *s 

 2. Add some code, which writes the number of successfully sent pages to
 an channel variable:

 static void phase_e_handler(t30_state_t *s, void *user_data, int result)
 {
 struct ast_channel *chan;
 char far_ident[21];
 char minibuf[11];new line

 chan = (struct ast_channel *) user_data;
 if (result)
 {
   fax_get_far_ident(s, far_ident);
   pbx_builtin_setvar_helper(chan, REMOTESTATIONID, far_ident);
   sprintf(minibuf, %d, s-t4.pages_transferred);  new
   pbx_builtin_setvar_helper(chan, FAX_PAGES_TRANSFERRED, minibuf);
 new


 Then you'll find the variable ${FAX_PAGES_TRANSFERRED} accessible from
 the dialplan.
 If you know the number of pages to be sent, you can compare and see if
 complete.

 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TXFAX() status

2005-09-01 Thread Moises Silva
hum... may be you could try to connect a real fax device at the other end ??On 8/29/05, Il Neofita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:Hi,I'm usinga script in order to send out my faxes with the application
txfax, therefore, I do not know how to see if the faxes are sent.Any idea?___--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com
 --Asterisk-Users mailing listAsterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- Su nombre es GNU/Linux, no solamente Linux, mas info en http://www.gnu.org
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] TXFAX() status

2005-08-29 Thread Il Neofita
Hi,
I'm using  a script in order to send out my faxes with the application
txfax, therefore, I do not know how to see if the faxes are sent.
Any idea?
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

2005-08-18 Thread Eckhard Rothfuchs
Am Mittwoch, 17. August 2005 17:06 schrieb Craig Guy:
 Hi Bartek, I posted the exact same problem last week - I found that if I
 connected two Asterisk systems together via a PRI crossover cable and talk
 txfax to rxfax then you get a T4 state timeout.  I tried connecting ports
 one and two together on a TE410p and also connecting a TE410p to a TE110p,
 and a TE110p to a TE110p on different machines.  I also found this when
 looping back via the PSTN.  I read up a bit on what T4 actually is, and it
 seems to be a pretty high level state, where the faxes are transferring or
 about to transfer the tiff image data between themselves.  The faxes will
 eventually hangup on each other - if you do a zap destroy channel to force
 hangup then you will sometimes get a segfault and asterisk will crash.

 I haven't found a solution for it, but it's not a big problem for me as I
 was only going txfax to rxfax as part of testing something else and I am
 using a hardfax attached to a SIP ata instead that works just fine against
 both rxfax and txfax.

 Craig

 - Original Message -
 From: Bartek Kania [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 9:57 PM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:
  Bartek Kania wrote:
  If the call really dialed out through a PSTN port and back in it
  should work.  It is was a pure internal connection between 2
  processes it will not. The timing for these programs comes from the
  received data. No data, no work.
 
  I can confirm that this problem appears on a call through the PSTN.
  My setup is:
  TxFax - Asterisk - E1 - Asterisk (same box) -RxFax
  Asterisk version 1.0.9 and spandsp version 0.0.2pre18 on debian woody
  (3.0).
  I sent you an email about it with some debug information a week or so
  ago.
  If you need it again, or need some other info I'll be happy to provide
  it.
 
  Did you put txfax in caller mode?
 
  Yes I did.
  This is a snippet from 'show channel' for the two channels:
 Name: Zap/3-1
 Type: Zap
  ...
Frames in: 5249
   Frames out: 265
   Time to Hangup: 0
 Elapsed Time: 0h1m45s
   ...
  Application: RxFAX
 Data: /tmp/1123753288.12.tif
Stack: 1
  Blocking in: ast_waitfor_nandfds
 
  and
 
 Name: Zap/28-1
 Type: Zap
  ...
Frames in: 3123
   Frames out: 430
   Time to Hangup: 0
 Elapsed Time: 0h1m3s
   ...
  Application: TxFAX
 Data:
  /usr/local/asterisk/var/spool/asterisk/faxspool//ff-psbj1x.tif|caller|deb
 ug Stack: 0
  Blocking in: ast_waitfor_nandfds
 
  The console seems to indicate that the faxes start to communicate using
  the slow modems, and then hang after switching to a fast modem.
  Log is attached.
 
  /B
  - --
  * GPG-Key: http://evil.gnarf.org/mrbk.pgp
 
  A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
  Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
  - -- http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/
 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
 
  iD8DBQFDA0I5ckvkFeO3ANARAjLJAJ0eXELd2WjzGOy59ptkFEE3kiUJcQCgxF9P
  3WgYpTG5b1BfA3yOVk3w9wc=
  =lNab
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 ---
-

  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

-- 
-

Dipl. Ing. 
Eckhard   Rothfuchs

Felix-Klein-Str. 1a
37083 Göttingen

Fon:+49.(0)551.37075860
Fax:+49.(0)551.37075861
mobil:  +49.(0) 163.8760443
mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

2005-08-17 Thread Bartek Kania

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:

Roger Schreiter wrote:

How can I enable asterisk to fax to itsself?
Well, it won't be the normal operation, but when allowing clients
to fax, it can happen by chance, that someone faxes to another
user on the same machine without knowing it.
Thanks for any hints!

If the call really dialed out through a PSTN port and back in it
should work.  It is was a pure internal connection between 2
processes it will not. The timing for these programs comes from the
received data. No data, no work.


I can confirm that this problem appears on a call through the PSTN.
My setup is:
TxFax - Asterisk - E1 - Asterisk (same box) -RxFax

Asterisk version 1.0.9 and spandsp version 0.0.2pre18 on debian woody (3.0).

I sent you an email about it with some debug information a week or so ago.
If you need it again, or need some other info I'll be happy to provide it.

/B
- -- 
* GPG-Key: http://evil.gnarf.org/mrbk.pgp


A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
- -- http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDAui2ckvkFeO3ANARAuJPAKC00b+lEeHz+mOfb8J/zOF7+YAwggCeLFrG
KGkJxLFGCeBY6foyDqC1xGM=
=J6zk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

2005-08-17 Thread Steve Underwood

Bartek Kania wrote:


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:


Roger Schreiter wrote:


How can I enable asterisk to fax to itsself?
Well, it won't be the normal operation, but when allowing clients
to fax, it can happen by chance, that someone faxes to another
user on the same machine without knowing it.
Thanks for any hints!


If the call really dialed out through a PSTN port and back in it
should work.  It is was a pure internal connection between 2
processes it will not. The timing for these programs comes from the
received data. No data, no work.



I can confirm that this problem appears on a call through the PSTN.
My setup is:
TxFax - Asterisk - E1 - Asterisk (same box) -RxFax

Asterisk version 1.0.9 and spandsp version 0.0.2pre18 on debian woody 
(3.0).


I sent you an email about it with some debug information a week or so 
ago.
If you need it again, or need some other info I'll be happy to provide 
it.


Did you put txfax in caller mode?

Steve

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

2005-08-17 Thread Bartek Kania

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:

Bartek Kania wrote:

If the call really dialed out through a PSTN port and back in it
should work.  It is was a pure internal connection between 2
processes it will not. The timing for these programs comes from the
received data. No data, no work.

I can confirm that this problem appears on a call through the PSTN.
My setup is:
TxFax - Asterisk - E1 - Asterisk (same box) -RxFax
Asterisk version 1.0.9 and spandsp version 0.0.2pre18 on debian woody 
(3.0).

I sent you an email about it with some debug information a week or so ago.
If you need it again, or need some other info I'll be happy to provide it.

Did you put txfax in caller mode?


Yes I did.
This is a snippet from 'show channel' for the two channels:
   Name: Zap/3-1
   Type: Zap
   ...
  Frames in: 5249
 Frames out: 265
 Time to Hangup: 0
   Elapsed Time: 0h1m45s
...
Application: RxFAX
   Data: /tmp/1123753288.12.tif
  Stack: 1
Blocking in: ast_waitfor_nandfds

and

   Name: Zap/28-1
   Type: Zap
   ...
  Frames in: 3123
 Frames out: 430
 Time to Hangup: 0
   Elapsed Time: 0h1m3s
...
Application: TxFAX
   Data:
/usr/local/asterisk/var/spool/asterisk/faxspool//ff-psbj1x.tif|caller|debug
  Stack: 0
Blocking in: ast_waitfor_nandfds

The console seems to indicate that the faxes start to communicate using
the slow modems, and then hang after switching to a fast modem.
Log is attached.

/B
- -- 
* GPG-Key: http://evil.gnarf.org/mrbk.pgp


A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
- -- http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDA0I5ckvkFeO3ANARAjLJAJ0eXELd2WjzGOy59ptkFEE3kiUJcQCgxF9P
3WgYpTG5b1BfA3yOVk3w9wc=
=lNab
-END PGP SIGNATURE-Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 CSI: 40 35 38 33 20 30 30 30 36 2d 30 34 2d 36 34 2b 20 20 20 20 20
CSI without final frame tag
Remote fax gave CSI as: +xx-xx- xxx
 DIS: 80 00 ce f4 80 80 81 80 80 80 18
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
  Prefer 256 octet blocks
  Can receive fax
  Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: Unlimited
  Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
  R8x15.4lines/mm
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
  North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
  North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)
DCS:
  Can receive fax
  Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: A4 (297mm)
  Minimum scan line time: 20ms
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Start sending document
Start tx document
Changed from phase 2 to 4
 DCS: 83 00 c6 80 80 80 00
HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
DCS with final frame tag
In state 9
Coarse carrier frequency 1699.85 (66)
Training error 0.506731
Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 0.703194)
Changed from phase 6 to 3
Slow carrier up
T4 timeout in state 4
Start rx document
Start rx page - compression 2
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

2005-08-17 Thread Craig Guy
Hi Bartek, I posted the exact same problem last week - I found that if I 
connected two Asterisk systems together via a PRI crossover cable and talk 
txfax to rxfax then you get a T4 state timeout.  I tried connecting ports 
one and two together on a TE410p and also connecting a TE410p to a TE110p, 
and a TE110p to a TE110p on different machines.  I also found this when 
looping back via the PSTN.  I read up a bit on what T4 actually is, and it 
seems to be a pretty high level state, where the faxes are transferring or 
about to transfer the tiff image data between themselves.  The faxes will 
eventually hangup on each other - if you do a zap destroy channel to force 
hangup then you will sometimes get a segfault and asterisk will crash.


I haven't found a solution for it, but it's not a big problem for me as I 
was only going txfax to rxfax as part of testing something else and I am 
using a hardfax attached to a SIP ata instead that works just fine against 
both rxfax and txfax.


Craig

- Original Message - 
From: Bartek Kania [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion 
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com

Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs



-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Steve Underwood wrote:

Bartek Kania wrote:

If the call really dialed out through a PSTN port and back in it
should work.  It is was a pure internal connection between 2
processes it will not. The timing for these programs comes from the
received data. No data, no work.

I can confirm that this problem appears on a call through the PSTN.
My setup is:
TxFax - Asterisk - E1 - Asterisk (same box) -RxFax
Asterisk version 1.0.9 and spandsp version 0.0.2pre18 on debian woody
(3.0).
I sent you an email about it with some debug information a week or so 
ago.
If you need it again, or need some other info I'll be happy to provide 
it.

Did you put txfax in caller mode?


Yes I did.
This is a snippet from 'show channel' for the two channels:
   Name: Zap/3-1
   Type: Zap
...
  Frames in: 5249
 Frames out: 265
 Time to Hangup: 0
   Elapsed Time: 0h1m45s
 ...
Application: RxFAX
   Data: /tmp/1123753288.12.tif
  Stack: 1
Blocking in: ast_waitfor_nandfds

and

   Name: Zap/28-1
   Type: Zap
...
  Frames in: 3123
 Frames out: 430
 Time to Hangup: 0
   Elapsed Time: 0h1m3s
 ...
Application: TxFAX
   Data:
/usr/local/asterisk/var/spool/asterisk/faxspool//ff-psbj1x.tif|caller|debug
  Stack: 0
Blocking in: ast_waitfor_nandfds

The console seems to indicate that the faxes start to communicate using
the slow modems, and then hang after switching to a fast modem.
Log is attached.

/B
- -- 
* GPG-Key: http://evil.gnarf.org/mrbk.pgp


A: Because we read from top to bottom, left to right.
Q: Why should i start my reply below the quoted text?
- -- http://www.i-hate-computers.demon.co.uk/

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDA0I5ckvkFeO3ANARAjLJAJ0eXELd2WjzGOy59ptkFEE3kiUJcQCgxF9P
3WgYpTG5b1BfA3yOVk3w9wc=
=lNab
-END PGP SIGNATURE-







___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

2005-08-16 Thread Roger Schreiter

Hi,

I noticed a strange behaviour:
Faxing using spandsp (TxFax) from my asterisk box to my
old, common fax machine at home works fine.
Faxing from the same box to my office pc-fax (Hylafax)
also worke fine.

Receveiving faxes on my asterisk box using spandsp (RxFax)
also works fine. It is a PSTN number connected to the digium
card of that asterisk box.

Then I faxed from my asterisk box (TxFax) to that PSTN number,
my asterisk box answers the call, TxFax and RxFax, both start,
but no tif file is created in the directory, where normally the
fax files are created. Using show channel I can still see
both apps, TxFax and RxFax, even after half an hour. Then
I stopped using soft hangup, and tried again several times:
Same result.

So, do I have to avoid to fax to myself in any case, because
I risk to produce those never terminating jobs, which probably
consume some resources?


How can I enable asterisk to fax to itsself?
Well, it won't be the normal operation, but when allowing clients
to fax, it can happen by chance, that someone faxes to another
user on the same machine without knowing it.

Thanks for any hints!


Roger.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

2005-08-16 Thread Steve Underwood

Roger Schreiter wrote:


Hi,

I noticed a strange behaviour:
Faxing using spandsp (TxFax) from my asterisk box to my
old, common fax machine at home works fine.
Faxing from the same box to my office pc-fax (Hylafax)
also worke fine.

Receveiving faxes on my asterisk box using spandsp (RxFax)
also works fine. It is a PSTN number connected to the digium
card of that asterisk box.

Then I faxed from my asterisk box (TxFax) to that PSTN number,
my asterisk box answers the call, TxFax and RxFax, both start,
but no tif file is created in the directory, where normally the
fax files are created. Using show channel I can still see
both apps, TxFax and RxFax, even after half an hour. Then
I stopped using soft hangup, and tried again several times:
Same result.

So, do I have to avoid to fax to myself in any case, because
I risk to produce those never terminating jobs, which probably
consume some resources?


How can I enable asterisk to fax to itsself?
Well, it won't be the normal operation, but when allowing clients
to fax, it can happen by chance, that someone faxes to another
user on the same machine without knowing it.

Thanks for any hints!


If the call really dialed out through a PSTN port and back in it should 
work. It is was a pure internal connection between 2 processes it will 
not. The timing for these programs comes from the received data. No 
data, no work.


Regards,
Steve

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax - RxFax on same machine hangs

2005-08-16 Thread Roger Schreiter

Steve Underwood schrieb:

...
If the call really dialed out through a PSTN port and back in it should 
work. It is was a pure internal connection between 2 processes it will 



Hi,

the setup is:

TxFax (Box A)
Dial(Zap...) (Box A, Digium Card)
  v
PSTN
  v
Box B, Digium Card
Dial(IAX2...) (Box B)
  v
RxFax (Box A)

TxFax and RxFax ran on Box A. The PSTN call was accepted
at Box B and then forwarded via IAX2 to Box A.

RxFax and TxFax did nothing, and were never terminated, and
thus needed an expicit Hangup command.


Regards,
Roger.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax on strike while rxfax works flawlessly

2005-08-13 Thread Arik Funke

Hello,
I have installed SpanDSP and the apps txfax an rxfax. Unfortunately I am 
having problems sending faxes. I only get cancelled transfers. I am 
trying to send a fax to a ISDN card connected to a zap channel.


I am using following call file:
---
Channel: ZAP/g1/25
MaxRetries: 0
WaitTime: 20
Application: txfax
Data: /tmp/lVD3wy.tiff|caller


Asterisk shows:
---
-- Attempting call on ZAP/g1/25 for application 
txfax(/tmp/EmailToFax-lVD3wy.tiff|caller) (Retry 1)

-- Requested transfer capability: 0x00 - SPEECH
  == Primary D-Channel on span 2 up for TEI 64
Channel Zap/2-1 was answered.
Lauching txfax(/tmp/lVD3wy.tiff|caller) on Zap/2-1
Urgent handler
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
Start tx document
CFR with final frame tag
In state 4
Start tx page 0
Start tx page 1
XCN with final frame tag
In state 14
-- Hungup 'Zap/2-1'
Aug 13 13:43:55 NOTICE[11332]: pbx_spool.c:239 attempt_thread: Call 
completed to ZAP/g1/25



The tiff file I am using I have received and saved with rxfax... So I am 
reasonably sure that it has nothing to do with the image file. 
Unfortunatly the messages txfax prints do not tell me anything at all.


Can anybody help me with this?

Cheers,
Arik
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax spandsp

2005-08-12 Thread Craig Guy
I've been using spandsp and rxfax to receive faxes for a while now and over 
the past few days I've looked into the other side of things - txfax.  I 
can't seem to get it working properly.  I've included debug logs below of 
both the tx and rx side of things.  I've tried three different servers, 
asterisk v1.0.6, 1.0.9 and CVS, FC2 and FC4, libtiff 3.5.7 and 3.7.1, TE405P 
and TE110P cards, connected to each other via crossover cable (with rxfax as 
a fax client), the TE405P connected to itself (ports one and two crossover 
cable), and also connected to the PSTN with a hardfax on the other end.  I 
always get the same errors.


Would be very grateful if someone could give me some pointers or otherwise 
shed some light.  The logs below are from spandsp 0.0.2 pre18 on CVS Head 
txfax talking to 0.0.2 pre18 on v1.0.9 stable rxfax.  Doesn't matter though 
as the last debug entry is always the same (T4 timeout in state 4)



*  TXFAX Debug *

   -- Executing TxFAX(Zap/1-1, /tmp/11236686843.tif|caller|debug) in 
new stack

Slow carrier up
Urgent handler
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 DIS: 80 00 ce f4 80 80 81 80 80 80 18
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
 Prefer 256 octet blocks
 Can receive fax
 Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29
 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: Unlimited
 Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
 R8x15.4lines/mm
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
 North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
 North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)
DCS:
 Can receive fax
 Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: A4 (297mm)
 Minimum scan line time: 20ms
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Start sending document
Start tx document
Changed from phase 2 to 4

DCS: 83 00 86 80 80 80 00

HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 3
Slow carrier up
T4 timeout in state 4

* End of txfax debug *

* RXFAX debug *
Aug 12 11:00:12 DEBUG[11937]: pbx.c:1274 pbx_extension_helper: Launching 
'RxFAX'-- Executing RxFAX(Zap/1-1, 
/var/mbox/msgs/1123815612.2.tif|debug) in new stack

Urgent handler
Aug 12 11:00:12 DEBUG[11937]: channel.c:1752 ast_set_read_format: Set 
channel Zap/1-1 to read format slin
Aug 12 11:00:12 DEBUG[11937]: channel.c:1719 ast_set_write_format: Set 
channel Zap/1-1 to write format slin

Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Aug 12 11:00:12 DEBUG[11937]: chan_zap.c:4138 my_zt_write: Write returned -1 
(Resource temporarily unavailable) on channel 1

Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Changed from phase 1 to 4
DIS:
 Prefer 256 octet blocks
 Can receive fax
 Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29
 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: Unlimited
 Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
 R8x15.4lines/mm
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
 North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
 North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)

DIS: 80 00 ce f4 80 80 81 80 80 80 18
Aug 12 11:00:16 DEBUG[11937]: chan_zap.c:4053 zt_read: DTMF digit: f on 
Zap/1-1

Aug 12 11:00:16 DEBUG[11937]: chan_zap.c:4095 zt_read: Fax already handled
HDLC underflow in state 9
Changed from phase 4 to 3
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 DCS: 83 00 86 80 80 80 00
DCS with final frame tag
In state 9
DCS:
 Can receive fax
 Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: A4 (297mm)
 Minimum scan line time: 20ms
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Get at 9600bps, modem 1
Changed from phase 3 to 5
Fast carrier up
Fast carrier down
Fast carrier up
Coarse carrier frequency 1699.90 (68)
Training error 0.294910
Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 0.636352)
Fast carrier trained


Craig 


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] TxFax: can't get a fax to destination (log inside)

2005-06-20 Thread Marco Parmeggiani
Can someone explain me what's going on and why the receiver of this fax 
guives up saying communication error?



Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 34 39 34 35 36 34 39 35 30 20 39 33 2b
CSI without final frame tag
Remote fax gave CSI as: +39 059465494   
 DIS: 80 00 ee f8 c4 00
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
  Prefer 256 octet blocks
  Can receive fax
  Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
  Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
  Error correction mode
  T.6 coding
DCS:
  Can receive fax
  Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: A4 (297mm)
  Minimum scan line time: 20ms
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Start sending document
Start tx document
Changed from phase 2 to 4
 DCS: 83 00 86 80 80 80 00
HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 3
Slow carrier up
 CFR: 84
CFR with final frame tag
In state 4
Trainability test succeeded
Start tx page 0
Slow carrier down
Changed from phase 3 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 4
Start tx page 1
 EOP: 2f
HDLC underflow in state 14
Changed from phase 4 to 3
Slow carrier up
 RTN: 4c
RTN with final frame tag
In state 14
Changed from phase 3 to 4
 DCN: fb
HDLC underflow in state 2
Disconnecting
Changed from phase 4 to 7
Changed from phase 7 to 8
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax: can't get a fax to destination (log inside)

2005-06-20 Thread Lee Howard

Marco Parmeggiani wrote:

Can someone explain me what's going on and why the receiver of this 
fax guives up saying communication error?


Start tx page 1
 EOP: 2f
 RTN: 4c
 DCN: fb
Disconnecting



The receiver says communication error because txfax's response to the 
receiver's RTN signal was a DCN (disconnect) signal instead of a usual 
Phase B signal (i.e. DCS), also known as retraining.


In non-ECM mode a receiver analyzes the quality of the incoming image 
data and determines whether or not it is of an acceptable quality.  
Then, after the sender transmits the post-page signal (EOP in this case, 
meaning last page), the receiver transmits either MCF (confirmation, 
meaning the received page quality was acceptable) or RTN (meaning the 
page quality was unacceptable and that retraining is required before the 
next page is received).


My understanding of T.30 (and I'm not alone in this thought) was that 
RTN is meant to be the antithesis of MCF.  So not only does it mean that 
retraining is required for the next page, but it also means that the 
previous page was *not* received properly (i.e. not printed).  So, 
basically the page will need to get resent for the page to get through.  
However, many fax senders (especially old fax machines) were incapable 
of retransmitting a page because they didn't have the memory to store a 
full page of image data and so they sent data as they scanned it.  So of 
necessity these senders had to treat RTN as a confirmation and they left 
it up to the receiver to call back and request a retransmission of 
whatever pages came through uncleanly.  Some senders may have even 
produced a transmission report indicating to the sender which pages 
should be retransmitted in a new call.  Ultimately what this did for the 
fax community, though, was that it gave us a very confused understanding 
of an RTN signal.  And so various things were programmed with this 
confusing understanding programmed-in, and this programming often 
persists in modern fax machines because manufacturers don't rewrite 
their fax code very often if ever.


So txfax is behaving as many fax senders out there behave, although my 
opinion is that it is behaving incorrectly... and apparently this 
receiver that you are working with shares that opinion.


Lee.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax: can't get a fax to destination (log inside)

2005-06-20 Thread Steve Underwood

Lee Howard wrote:


Marco Parmeggiani wrote:

Can someone explain me what's going on and why the receiver of this 
fax guives up saying communication error?


Start tx page 1
 EOP: 2f
 RTN: 4c
 DCN: fb
Disconnecting




The receiver says communication error because txfax's response to the 
receiver's RTN signal was a DCN (disconnect) signal instead of a usual 
Phase B signal (i.e. DCS), also known as retraining.


In non-ECM mode a receiver analyzes the quality of the incoming 
image data and determines whether or not it is of an acceptable 
quality.  Then, after the sender transmits the post-page signal (EOP 
in this case, meaning last page), the receiver transmits either MCF 
(confirmation, meaning the received page quality was acceptable) or 
RTN (meaning the page quality was unacceptable and that retraining is 
required before the next page is received).


My understanding of T.30 (and I'm not alone in this thought) was that 
RTN is meant to be the antithesis of MCF.  So not only does it mean 
that retraining is required for the next page, but it also means that 
the previous page was *not* received properly (i.e. not printed).  So, 
basically the page will need to get resent for the page to get 
through.  However, many fax senders (especially old fax machines) were 
incapable of retransmitting a page because they didn't have the memory 
to store a full page of image data and so they sent data as they 
scanned it.  So of necessity these senders had to treat RTN as a 
confirmation and they left it up to the receiver to call back and 
request a retransmission of whatever pages came through uncleanly.  
Some senders may have even produced a transmission report indicating 
to the sender which pages should be retransmitted in a new call.  
Ultimately what this did for the fax community, though, was that it 
gave us a very confused understanding of an RTN signal.  And so 
various things were programmed with this confusing understanding 
programmed-in, and this programming often persists in modern fax 
machines because manufacturers don't rewrite their fax code very often 
if ever.


So txfax is behaving as many fax senders out there behave, although my 
opinion is that it is behaving incorrectly... and apparently this 
receiver that you are working with shares that opinion.


TxFAX is doing the right thing, according to the spec. If you don't know 
how to handle RTN you should disconect. spandsp has not yet been taught 
how to retrain and retransmit properly. However, this is largely 
irrelevant. On modern lines a retransmit should be rare. Lately lots of 
people are reporting this problem to me, and I have not had time to 
investigate why it happens. Some say it happens with specific machines, 
and some with all machines.


Regards,
Steve

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax: can't get a fax to destination (log inside)

2005-06-20 Thread Lee Howard

Steve Underwood wrote:

TxFAX is doing the right thing, according to the spec. If you don't 
know how to handle RTN you should disconect. spandsp has not yet been 
taught how to retrain and retransmit properly.



Okay, so it's not an error.  It's an unimplemented feature.  :-)

However, this is largely irrelevant. On modern lines a retransmit 
should be rare.



Yes, agreed.  On a digital receiver I've seen it only 5 times in the 
last week of 672 applicable (non-ECM) faxes... although those statistics 
may be skewed due to the receiver supporting ECM (the vast majority of 
faxes -  - were received with ECM).


Lately lots of people are reporting this problem to me, and I have not 
had time to investigate why it happens. Some say it happens with 
specific machines, and some with all machines.



One of the nice things about ECM is that it generally gives a very 
accurate picture of any Phase C data corruption, and that can help lead 
to an understanding as to the nature of any problems.  It's helped me 
find modem flow-control problems as well as modulator flaws that were 
causing the modulator itself to generate interference.  You may want to 
try running some faxes through your unicall T.31 modem to/from HylaFAX 
to see if the error lies within the common underlying interfaces, or 
whether or not it is something specific to txfax or libtiff.


Lee.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax 18Kb file problem

2005-06-17 Thread Vladyslav
 Hi ALL.
 I have a problem with TxFax application. (RxFax is working properly)
 Txfax does not work when sending tiff files bigger than approx. 18Kb. If tiff
file smaller than 18Kb everything is OK. Tested in LAN with Panasonic UF-E1 fax
machine (tiff files was created by the rxfax from that machine) and SAP-3000.
Also tested with some remote fax machines (connected to PSTN and via VoIP).
Results are same. Small file in most cases is OK, bigger is FAILED.
 Environment: Fedora Core 2 and 3, spandsp 0.0.2pre18, libtiff 3.5.7-20.2 and
3.7.1-6, Asterisk 20050427CVS


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax return code

2005-05-24 Thread Wallace Wadge
I needed a system to allow my windows clients to hit print and
eventually result in a fax being sent via asterisk. I used smbfax and
modified it to allow the phone number to be supplied by means of an
email and it all works fine


...except I do not know how to read off the TxFAX application exit
code to determine if the fax was successfully sent or not. I'm
currently using .call files to auto dial the fax out.


Any ideas?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] TxFax and Tiffs

2005-05-04 Thread Matthew
I am trying to use TxFax and I'm running into a few issues with it.
The problems seem to come from the format of the tiff I am sending.
Does anyone know what the correct format to be sending in? I'm using
Ghostscript to create the tiff, and I've tried quite a few different
settings. Right now the Tiff comes through pretty clear, but gets cut
off after about 570pixels of height.

I've tried tiffg3 tiffg4 tiffg32d (which is best?)
I've tried various resolutions(what should the resolution be?)
I've tried various paper sizes (Should I be using letter?, A4?,
something else? Does it matter?)
Is there some other setting i should be changing?

Thanks
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax and Ghostscript 8.51

2005-05-02 Thread Me
If the problem is with libtiff, its a problem with every version i've
tried (3.5.7, 3.6.0,  3.6.1, 3.7.1 and 3.7.2)


On 4/30/05, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Me wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 I'm trying to use spandsp and asterisk to send faxes. To do so I am
 creating tiffs with Ghostscript. When I use Ghostscript 6.50 it seems
 to work fine, but when I create the tiff using Ghostscript 8.51 (or
 7.06) txfax garbles the tiff and it comes through all messed up.
 First of all is this a known problem or is it just me. More
 importantly does anyone know of a way to fix this, I'd like to use
 8.51 instead of 6.50.
 
 By the way, if it makes a differnece i'm currently running
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I've encountered the same problem with all the other
 asterisk builds i've tried
 
 
 It is really a change to Ghostscript or a related change to libtiff
 causing you problems. Libtiff is the usual suspect when FAX images go wrong.
 
 Regards,
 Steve
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax and Ghostscript 8.51

2005-05-02 Thread Steve Underwood
Send an example TIFF file, and I will investigate.
Regards,
Steve
Me wrote:
If the problem is with libtiff, its a problem with every version i've
tried (3.5.7, 3.6.0,  3.6.1, 3.7.1 and 3.7.2)
On 4/30/05, Steve Underwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

Me wrote:
   

Hi all,
I'm trying to use spandsp and asterisk to send faxes. To do so I am
creating tiffs with Ghostscript. When I use Ghostscript 6.50 it seems
to work fine, but when I create the tiff using Ghostscript 8.51 (or
7.06) txfax garbles the tiff and it comes through all messed up.
First of all is this a known problem or is it just me. More
importantly does anyone know of a way to fix this, I'd like to use
8.51 instead of 6.50.
By the way, if it makes a differnece i'm currently running
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but I've encountered the same problem with all the other
asterisk builds i've tried
 

It is really a change to Ghostscript or a related change to libtiff
causing you problems. Libtiff is the usual suspect when FAX images go wrong.
Regards,
Steve
   

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax and Ghostscript 8.51

2005-04-30 Thread Steve Underwood
Me wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use spandsp and asterisk to send faxes. To do so I am
creating tiffs with Ghostscript. When I use Ghostscript 6.50 it seems
to work fine, but when I create the tiff using Ghostscript 8.51 (or
7.06) txfax garbles the tiff and it comes through all messed up. 
First of all is this a known problem or is it just me. More
importantly does anyone know of a way to fix this, I'd like to use
8.51 instead of 6.50.

By the way, if it makes a differnece i'm currently running
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but I've encountered the same problem with all the other
asterisk builds i've tried
 

It is really a change to Ghostscript or a related change to libtiff 
causing you problems. Libtiff is the usual suspect when FAX images go wrong.

Regards,
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax and Ghostscript 8.51

2005-04-29 Thread Me
Hi all,

I'm trying to use spandsp and asterisk to send faxes. To do so I am
creating tiffs with Ghostscript. When I use Ghostscript 6.50 it seems
to work fine, but when I create the tiff using Ghostscript 8.51 (or
7.06) txfax garbles the tiff and it comes through all messed up. 
First of all is this a known problem or is it just me. More
importantly does anyone know of a way to fix this, I'd like to use
8.51 instead of 6.50.

By the way, if it makes a differnece i'm currently running
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but I've encountered the same problem with all the other
asterisk builds i've tried

thanks
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Vladyslav
Hi Ppl.
Once, couple weeks ago when I have updated * from CVS-HEAD something
happen and I could not send a fax anymore.
After that I have tried previous * CVS versions with different versions
of spandsp (0.0.1, 0.0.2pre4, 0.0.2pre10) but without any changes.
I have tried that on Fedora Core 2 with libtiff-3.5.7-16.1 and
libtiff-devel-3.5.7-16.1. Everything compiles smoothly, but when I try
to send a fax it tries to negotiate and than hangup (on fax machine -
incomplete), also tried to send to another fax machine (but result was
the same). 
I get back to spandsp-0.0.1 because that one has at least a bit more
debug output than 0.0.2pre10.
and here what I got:

Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
NSF without final frame tag
The remote is made by 'Panasonic'
 DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
DIS with final frame tag
In state 4
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 XCN: fa
XCN with final frame tag
In state 4
Disconnecting
Changed from phase 3 to 7

 Does anyone have a clue what it could be ?


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Vladyslav,
Use 0.0.2pre1, but add the line
   fax.verbose = TRUE;
just after
   fax_init(fax, calling_party, NULL);
That will turn on the detailed logging.
Is the listing you posted the entire log? It looks like there should be 
more.

One common mistake people make - Did you use the |caller parameter 
when running txfax?

Regards,
Steve
Vladyslav wrote:
Hi Ppl.
Once, couple weeks ago when I have updated * from CVS-HEAD something
happen and I could not send a fax anymore.
After that I have tried previous * CVS versions with different versions
of spandsp (0.0.1, 0.0.2pre4, 0.0.2pre10) but without any changes.
I have tried that on Fedora Core 2 with libtiff-3.5.7-16.1 and
libtiff-devel-3.5.7-16.1. Everything compiles smoothly, but when I try
to send a fax it tries to negotiate and than hangup (on fax machine -
incomplete), also tried to send to another fax machine (but result was
the same). 
I get back to spandsp-0.0.1 because that one has at least a bit more
debug output than 0.0.2pre10.
and here what I got:

Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
NSF without final frame tag
The remote is made by 'Panasonic'
 DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
DIS with final frame tag
In state 4
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 XCN: fa
XCN with final frame tag
In state 4
Disconnecting
Changed from phase 3 to 7
Does anyone have a clue what it could be ?
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Vladyslav
Thx for your reply.

On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 17:35, Steve Underwood wrote:
 Hi Vladyslav,
 
 Use 0.0.2pre1, but add the line
 fax.verbose = TRUE;
 just after
 fax_init(fax, calling_party, NULL);
 
 That will turn on the detailed logging.
 
Added, recompiled and tested again.
 Is the listing you posted the entire log? It looks like there should be 
 more.
 
Yes, before there was some additional information 
 One common mistake people make - Did you use the |caller parameter 
 when running txfax?
yes I use that one.

 Regards,
 Steve
 
Here is new one : (but it's spandsp-0.0.2pre10)

*CLI -- Executing NoOp(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
-- Executing AGI(SIP/103-dfb6, set-timestamp.agi) in new stack
-- Executing System(SIP/103-dfb6, echo 16032005-18:15:06 -
VladK 103 - SIP/103-dfb6 - 901  /var/log/asterisk/calls) in new
stack
-- Executing DBput(SIP/103-dfb6, RepeatDial/103=901) in new
stack
-- DBput: family=RepeatDial, key=103, value=901
-- Executing DBget(SIP/103-dfb6, recv=Record/103) in new stack
-- DBget: varname=recv, family=Record, key=103
-- DBget: set variable recv to on
-- Executing GotoIf(SIP/103-dfb6, 1?7:9) in new stack
-- Goto (from-sip,901,7)
-- Executing SetVar(SIP/103-dfb6,
CALLFILENAME=20050316-181506-103-901) in new stack
-- Executing Monitor(SIP/103-dfb6, wav|20050316-181506-103-901)
in new stack
-- Executing Goto(SIP/103-dfb6, from-sip-post|901|1) in new
stack
-- Goto (from-sip-post,901,1)
-- Executing Answer(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
-- Executing TxFAX(SIP/103-dfb6, /tmp/testfax.tif|caller) in new
stack
Slow carrier up
Mar 16 18:15:10 NOTICE[10168]: rtp.c:540 ast_rtp_read: Unknown RTP codec
100 received
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
NSF without final frame tag
The remote was made by 'Panasonic'
 DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
  V.8 capable
  Prefer 256 octet blocks
  Can receive fax
  Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm or 255mm
  Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
  Receiver's minimum scan line time: 5ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
  Error correction mode
  R8x15.4lines/mm
  Metric-based resolution preferred
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
DCS:
  Can receive fax
  Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: A4 (297mm)
  Minimum scan line time: 20ms
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Start sending document
Start tx document
Changed from phase 2 to 4
 DCS: 83 00 c6 80 80 80 00
HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 3
Slow carrier up
 CFR: 84
CFR with final frame tag
In state 4
Trainability test succeeded
Start tx page
Slow carrier down
Changed from phase 3 to 6

*CLI show ch
channel   channels  channeltypes
*CLI show channels
Channel  (ContextExtensionPri )   State Appl.
Data
0 active channel(s)


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Vladyslav,
The log looks good so far. The far end has negotiated. The fast modem 
has been tested. Transmission of the first page has been. What happens 
next. I don't think the log really stopped at that point. Did you wait 
long enough for the page transmission to complete?

Regards,
Steve
Vladyslav wrote:
Here is new one : (but it's spandsp-0.0.2pre10)
*CLI -- Executing NoOp(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
   -- Executing AGI(SIP/103-dfb6, set-timestamp.agi) in new stack
   -- Executing System(SIP/103-dfb6, echo 16032005-18:15:06 -
VladK 103 - SIP/103-dfb6 - 901  /var/log/asterisk/calls) in new
stack
   -- Executing DBput(SIP/103-dfb6, RepeatDial/103=901) in new
stack
   -- DBput: family=RepeatDial, key=103, value=901
   -- Executing DBget(SIP/103-dfb6, recv=Record/103) in new stack
   -- DBget: varname=recv, family=Record, key=103
   -- DBget: set variable recv to on
   -- Executing GotoIf(SIP/103-dfb6, 1?7:9) in new stack
   -- Goto (from-sip,901,7)
   -- Executing SetVar(SIP/103-dfb6,
CALLFILENAME=20050316-181506-103-901) in new stack
   -- Executing Monitor(SIP/103-dfb6, wav|20050316-181506-103-901)
in new stack
   -- Executing Goto(SIP/103-dfb6, from-sip-post|901|1) in new
stack
   -- Goto (from-sip-post,901,1)
   -- Executing Answer(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
   -- Executing TxFAX(SIP/103-dfb6, /tmp/testfax.tif|caller) in new
stack
Slow carrier up
Mar 16 18:15:10 NOTICE[10168]: rtp.c:540 ast_rtp_read: Unknown RTP codec
100 received
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
NSF without final frame tag
The remote was made by 'Panasonic'
 DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
 V.8 capable
 Prefer 256 octet blocks
 Can receive fax
 Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm or 255mm
 Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
 Receiver's minimum scan line time: 5ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
 Error correction mode
 R8x15.4lines/mm
 Metric-based resolution preferred
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
DCS:
 Can receive fax
 Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
 2D coding
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: A4 (297mm)
 Minimum scan line time: 20ms
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Start sending document
Start tx document
Changed from phase 2 to 4
 

DCS: 83 00 c6 80 80 80 00
   

HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 3
Slow carrier up
 CFR: 84
CFR with final frame tag
In state 4
Trainability test succeeded
Start tx page
Slow carrier down
Changed from phase 3 to 6
*CLI show ch
channel   channels  channeltypes
*CLI show channels
   Channel  (ContextExtensionPri )   State Appl.
Data
0 active channel(s)
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFAX problem

2005-03-16 Thread Vladyslav
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 18:25, Steve Underwood wrote:
 Hi Vladyslav,
 
 The log looks good so far. The far end has negotiated. The fast modem 
 has been tested. Transmission of the first page has been. What happens 
 next. I don't think the log really stopped at that point. Did you wait 
 long enough for the page transmission to complete?

After that point Changed from phase 3 to 6 
fax machine says Incomplete + error code.
And that's all.

BTW, Fax machine connected via SIPURA-2000 (which registered directly on
* and use ulaw)
But I could receive fax from PSTN via *-SIPURA-Fax machine
 
 
 Regards,
 Steve
 
 
 Vladyslav wrote:
 
 Here is new one : (but it's spandsp-0.0.2pre10)
 
 *CLI -- Executing NoOp(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
 -- Executing AGI(SIP/103-dfb6, set-timestamp.agi) in new stack
 -- Executing System(SIP/103-dfb6, echo 16032005-18:15:06 -
 VladK 103 - SIP/103-dfb6 - 901  /var/log/asterisk/calls) in new
 stack
 -- Executing DBput(SIP/103-dfb6, RepeatDial/103=901) in new
 stack
 -- DBput: family=RepeatDial, key=103, value=901
 -- Executing DBget(SIP/103-dfb6, recv=Record/103) in new stack
 -- DBget: varname=recv, family=Record, key=103
 -- DBget: set variable recv to on
 -- Executing GotoIf(SIP/103-dfb6, 1?7:9) in new stack
 -- Goto (from-sip,901,7)
 -- Executing SetVar(SIP/103-dfb6,
 CALLFILENAME=20050316-181506-103-901) in new stack
 -- Executing Monitor(SIP/103-dfb6, wav|20050316-181506-103-901)
 in new stack
 -- Executing Goto(SIP/103-dfb6, from-sip-post|901|1) in new
 stack
 -- Goto (from-sip-post,901,1)
 -- Executing Answer(SIP/103-dfb6, ) in new stack
 -- Executing TxFAX(SIP/103-dfb6, /tmp/testfax.tif|caller) in new
 stack
 Slow carrier up
 Mar 16 18:15:10 NOTICE[10168]: rtp.c:540 ast_rtp_read: Unknown RTP codec
 100 received
 Slow carrier down
 Slow carrier up
 Slow carrier down
 Slow carrier up
  NSF: 20 00 00 79 00 00 00 82 0f 09 03 10 10 00 02 95 80 9c f8 80 40
 01 49 02 41 52 41 59 4f 5a 20 55 4b 52 41 49 4e 45 23 20 03
 NSF without final frame tag
 The remote was made by 'Panasonic'
  DIS: 80 20 ee 99 84 80 11
 DIS with final frame tag
 In state 10
 DIS:
   V.8 capable
   Prefer 256 octet blocks
   Can receive fax
   Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
   R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
   2D coding
   Scan line length: 215mm or 255mm
   Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
   Receiver's minimum scan line time: 5ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
   Error correction mode
   R8x15.4lines/mm
   Metric-based resolution preferred
   Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
 DCS:
   Can receive fax
   Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
   2D coding
   Scan line length: 215mm
   Recording length: A4 (297mm)
   Minimum scan line time: 20ms
   Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
 Start sending document
 Start tx document
 Changed from phase 2 to 4
   
 
 DCS: 83 00 c6 80 80 80 00
 
 
 HDLC underflow in state 3
 Changed from phase 4 to 6
 Changed from phase 6 to 3
 Slow carrier up
  CFR: 84
 CFR with final frame tag
 In state 4
 Trainability test succeeded
 Start tx page
 Slow carrier down
 Changed from phase 3 to 6
 
 *CLI show ch
 channel   channels  channeltypes
 *CLI show channels
 Channel  (ContextExtensionPri )   State Appl.
 Data
 0 active channel(s)
   
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax failure

2004-12-22 Thread Jean-Denis Girard
Hi list,
Just installed spandsp. In my limiting testing, I have an issue on a 
Philips fax machine (HFC21) directly connected to my * server through 
TDM400, reception with rxfax works fine, but txfax always fails. Below 
is a transcript of failed transmit.
This is with asterisk-1.0.3 (with native moh patch but I don't think it 
is the source of the problem). I already tried libtiff 3.5.7, 3.6.0, 
3.6.1 (with hylafax patch), with same results. Echo cancel is off on the 
zap channel, though I dont think this is still needed. I have read the 
wiki, scott's faxing with asterisk, the mailing list, found nothing on 
bug tracker.
On a test to a Sagem fax (through the PSTN via TDM400 on my side) txfax 
worked flawlessly, so this is obviously related to the Philips fax, but 
maybe there is something in the logs below that shows the source of the 
problem, and a help fix it. I'm available for more testing.

Thanks,
Jean-Denis Girard
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/1-1'
Urgent handler
Dec 17 11:22:32 DEBUG[3600]: chan_zap.c:4031 zt_read: DTMF digit: 9 on
Zap/1-1
Dec 17 11:22:32 DEBUG[3600]: chan_zap.c:4031 zt_read: DTMF digit: 7 on
Zap/1-1
Dec 17 11:22:32 DEBUG[3600]: chan_zap.c:1221 zt_enable_ec: No
echocancellation requested
Dec 17 11:22:32 DEBUG[3600]: pbx.c:1261 pbx_extension_helper: Launching
'Answer'
-- Executing Answer(Zap/1-1, ) in new stack
Dec 17 11:22:32 DEBUG[3600]: chan_zap.c:2288 zt_answer: Took Zap/1-1 off
hook
Dec 17 11:22:32 DEBUG[3600]: pbx.c:1261 pbx_extension_helper: Launching
'BackGround'
-- Executing BackGround(Zap/1-1, Sysnux/bonjour1) in new stack
Dec 17 11:22:32 DEBUG[3600]: channel.c:1710 ast_set_write_format: Set
channel Zap/1-1 to write format slin
Dec 17 11:22:32 DEBUG[3600]: channel.c:1131 ast_settimeout: Scheduling
timer at 160 sample intervals
-- Playing 'Sysnux/bonjour1' (language 'fr')
Urgent handler
Dec 17 11:22:40 DEBUG[3600]: channel.c:1131 ast_settimeout: Scheduling
timer at 97 sample intervals
Dec 17 11:22:40 DEBUG[3600]: channel.c:1131 ast_settimeout: Scheduling
timer at 0 sample intervals
Dec 17 11:22:40 DEBUG[3600]: channel.c:1131 ast_settimeout: Scheduling
timer at 0 sample intervals
Dec 17 11:22:40 DEBUG[3600]: channel.c:1710 ast_set_write_format: Set
channel Zap/1-1 to write format ulaw
Dec 17 11:22:40 DEBUG[3600]: pbx.c:1261 pbx_extension_helper: Launching
'TxFAX'
-- Executing TxFAX(Zap/1-1, ) in new stack
Dec 17 11:22:40 DEBUG[3600]: channel.c:1743 ast_set_read_format: Set
channel Zap/1-1 to read format slin
Dec 17 11:22:40 DEBUG[3600]: channel.c:1710 ast_set_write_format: Set
channel Zap/1-1 to write format slin
Changed from phase 0 to 1
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Urgent handler
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Changed from phase 1 to 4
Sending ident
CSI: 40 37 32 35 33 38 34 20 39 38 36 2b 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
DIS:
  Prefer 256 octet blocks
  Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: Unlimited
  Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
  R8x15.4lines/mm
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
  North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
  North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)
DIS: 80 00 cc f4 80 80 81 80 80 80 18
HDLC underflow in state 9
Changed from phase 4 to 3
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 50 80 00 da 00 00 02 00 60 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
NSF without final frame tag
 CSI: 40 37 32 35 33 38 34 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
CSI without final frame tag
Remote fax gave CSI as: 483527
T4 timeout in state 9
Changed from phase 3 to 4
Sending ident
CSI: 40 37 32 35 33 38 34 20 39 38 36 2b 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
DIS:
  Prefer 256 octet blocks
  Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm
  2D coding
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: Unlimited
  Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
  R8x15.4lines/mm
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
  North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
  North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)
DIS: 80 00 cc f4 80 80 81 80 80 80 18
HDLC underflow in state 9
Changed from phase 4 to 3
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 XCN: fa
XCN with final frame tag
In state 9
Disconnecting
Changed from phase 3 to 7
-- Setting global variable 'REMOTESTATIONID' to '483527'
Changed from phase 7 to 8
Urgent handler
Dec 17 11:22:52 DEBUG[3600]: channel.c:1743 ast_set_read_format: Set
channel Zap/1-1 to read format ulaw
Dec 17 11:22:52 DEBUG[3600]: channel.c:1710 ast_set_write_format: Set
channel Zap/1-1 to write format ulaw
Dec 17 11:22:59 DEBUG[3600]: chan_zap.c:3764 __zt_exception: Exception
on 19, channel 1
Dec 17 11:22:59 DEBUG[3600]: chan_zap.c:3076 zt_handle_event: Got event
On hook(1) on channel 1 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax failure

2004-12-22 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Jean Denis,
I think you are using spandsp-0.0.1 It has this problem with some 
Philips, Canon, and a few other machines. Try spandsp-0.0.2pre6. That 
fixes the problem, and has various other improvements.

Regards,
Steve
Jean-Denis Girard wrote:
Hi list,
Just installed spandsp. In my limiting testing, I have an issue on a 
Philips fax machine (HFC21) directly connected to my * server through 
TDM400, reception with rxfax works fine, but txfax always fails. Below 
is a transcript of failed transmit.
This is with asterisk-1.0.3 (with native moh patch but I don't think 
it is the source of the problem). I already tried libtiff 3.5.7, 
3.6.0, 3.6.1 (with hylafax patch), with same results. Echo cancel is 
off on the zap channel, though I dont think this is still needed. I 
have read the wiki, scott's faxing with asterisk, the mailing list, 
found nothing on bug tracker.
On a test to a Sagem fax (through the PSTN via TDM400 on my side) 
txfax worked flawlessly, so this is obviously related to the Philips 
fax, but maybe there is something in the logs below that shows the 
source of the problem, and a help fix it. I'm available for more testing.

Thanks,
Jean-Denis Girard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax failure

2004-12-22 Thread Jean-Denis Girard
Steve Underwood a écrit :
Hi Jean Denis,
I think you are using spandsp-0.0.1 It has this problem with some 
Philips, Canon, and a few other machines. Try spandsp-0.0.2pre6. That 
fixes the problem, and has various other improvements.

Sorry for forgetting that important info in my first message, but I am 
already using spandsp-0.0.2pre6.

Thanks,
Jean-Denis
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax

2004-11-19 Thread John Hill

Trying to send a fax using a call file and txfax.
Phone dials the remote fax answers but * gives me:

Call failed to go through, reason 3

And hangs up.

Any help.

Thanks
--John

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax

2004-11-19 Thread Steve Underwood
John Hill wrote:
Trying to send a fax using a call file and txfax.
Phone dials the remote fax answers but * gives me:
Call failed to go through, reason 3
And hangs up.
Any help.
Thanks
--John
 

Did you add |caller to the command?
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax problem?

2004-11-08 Thread Michael Welter
In my dial plan, I have
exten = 160,1,txfax(${FILENAME})
When I dial 160 from a fax machine, I hear a broken dial tone.  The 
processor utilization goes to 100%, and the following pair of messages 
is displayed at the console:

Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
This pair of messages repeats until I push the Start key on the fax. 
At this point things return to normal and the fax is sent to the machine.

Is this how it should work?  I'm using asterisk-1.0.2 and spandsp-0.0.1k
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael Welter
Introspect Telephony Corp.
Denver, Colorado US
+1.303.674.2575
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.introspect.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] txfax problem?

2004-11-08 Thread Steve Underwood
Michael Welter wrote:
In my dial plan, I have
exten = 160,1,txfax(${FILENAME})
When I dial 160 from a fax machine, I hear a broken dial tone.  The 
processor utilization goes to 100%, and the following pair of messages 
is displayed at the console:
100% CPU utilisation is not normal, unless you have a 16MHz 386 
processor. :-)

Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
This pair of messages repeats until I push the Start key on the fax. 
At this point things return to normal and the fax is sent to the machine.

Is this how it should work?  I'm using asterisk-1.0.2 and spandsp-0.0.1k
It may be the settings of your FAX machine. Some won't go into receive 
mode when they are the caller, unless special action is taken. Was there 
any document in the FAX machine's send tray? Some refuse to receive 
until they have finished sending. When I call into txfax with a fax 
machine the machine receives OK.

Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] txfax: Trainability test failed

2004-05-03 Thread ryan
Hi all,

I'm using txfax and rxfax to send and receive faxes.  I find that txfax performs very 
well when sending to an old fax machine.  However, when trying to send to a Mac (OS X) 
that accepts faxes, I get a Trainability test failed message on the * console (full 
console log below).

I'm OK with being unable to fax to Mac, as I'm just using it to test. For future 
reference, I'd like to know what causes this problem, and what steps (if any) I can 
take to correct it.

Thanks
Ryan


exten = out_fax,1,txfax(${TXFAX_NAME}|caller)

---SNIP---
-- Attempting call on Zap/g1/2442790 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 (Retry 1)
Channel Zap/1-1 was answered.
-- Executing Wait(Zap/1-1, 7) in new stack
-- Executing TxFAX(Zap/1-1, /var/spool/asterisk/fax/test.tif|caller) in new 
stack
File name is '/var/spool/asterisk/fax/test.tif'
Changed from phase 0 to 2
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 CSI: 40 30 39 37 32 20 34 34 32 20 33 30 34 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
CSI without final frame tag
Remote fax gave CSI as: 403 244 2790
 DIS: 80 00 6e 78
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
Preferred octets: 256
Can receive fax
Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK
Scan line length: 215mm
Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
DCS:
Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
Scan line length: 215mm
Recording length: A4 (297mm)
Minimum scan line time: 0ms
Start sending document
Start tx document - compression 1
Fine mode
Changed from phase 2 to 4
Sending ident
 TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
 DCS: 83 00 44 70
HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 3
T4 timeout in state 4
Slow carrier up
 FTT: 44
FTT with final frame tag
In state 4
Trainability test failed
Changed from phase 3 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 3
T4 timeout in state 4
---SNIP---
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems

2004-04-24 Thread Steve Underwood
Most Canon models seem to be working OK. Serge's Canon drops the line 
every time during negotiation, as though it has decided spandsp doesn't 
support compatible capabilities. It is not clear why this is happening, 
though. The modes which spandsp is asking to use are the most widely 
used ones. I think this must be a model specific issue.

Regards,
Steve
Eric Wieling wrote:

Almost all of our fax machines are Canon, so it's kinda tough to test
TxFax.
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 11:35, Serge Oleinikov wrote:
 

Hi Eric !
I have the same problem with Canon fax mashine as you have.  I have wrote an
email to Steve (developer of spandsp) some weeks ago and got no answer how
to fix the problem :(
Looks like connection was dropped by fax mashine without any reason
   

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems

2004-04-24 Thread Eric Wieling
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 12:38, Steve Underwood wrote:
 Most Canon models seem to be working OK. Serge's Canon drops the line 
 every time during negotiation, as though it has decided spandsp doesn't 
 support compatible capabilities. It is not clear why this is happening, 
 though. The modes which spandsp is asking to use are the most widely 
 used ones. I think this must be a model specific issue.

I can give you the number to our Cannon fax machines that have problems
if you want.  Or I can give you the audio files generated by spandsp, or
anything else you need to get this fixed.  I might even be able to find
an older machine that exhibits the problem we I can ship to you for
testing.  I don't suppose a bribe would help? 8-)

--Eric

-- 
  Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems

2004-04-24 Thread Serge Oleinikov

Hi Eric and Steve :)

My fax numbers (both Canon faxes)
3717201651
3726062501

- Original Message - 
From: Eric Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems


 On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 12:38, Steve Underwood wrote:
  Most Canon models seem to be working OK. Serge's Canon drops the line
  every time during negotiation, as though it has decided spandsp doesn't
  support compatible capabilities. It is not clear why this is happening,
  though. The modes which spandsp is asking to use are the most widely
  used ones. I think this must be a model specific issue.

 I can give you the number to our Cannon fax machines that have problems
 if you want.  Or I can give you the audio files generated by spandsp, or
 anything else you need to get this fixed.  I might even be able to find
 an older machine that exhibits the problem we I can ship to you for
 testing.  I don't suppose a bribe would help? 8-)

 --Eric

 -- 
   Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
 In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
 upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems

2004-04-21 Thread Eric Wieling
I'm getting the following when sending to a specific fax machine.  Any
ideas?

File name is '/var/spool/asterisk/email2fax/7F2SOeYJiU.tif'
Changed from phase 0 to 2
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
 NSF: 20 00 00 11 80 00 8a 49 10 53 54 49 52 4c 49 4e 47 20 43 4f 56
49 4e 47 54 00 67 00 80 80 80 0c 01 02
NSF without final frame tag
The remote is made by 'Canon'
 DIS: 80 20 ee 88 c4 80 95 80 80 80 38
DIS with final frame tag
In state 10
DIS:
V.8 capable
Preferred octets: 256
Can receive fax
Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK
2D coding OK
Scan line length: 215mm
Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
Receiver's minimum scan line time: 20ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
Error correction mode
T.6 coding
R8x15.4lines/mm OK
R16x15.4lines/mm and/or 400x400pels/25.4 mm OK
Metric-based resolution preferred
Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)
Single-progression sequential coding (Rec. T.85) basic
DCS:
Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
2D coding OK
Scan line length: 215mm
Recording length: A4 (297mm)
Minimum scan line time: 20ms
Start sending document
Start tx document - compression 2
Fine mode
Changed from phase 2 to 4
Sending ident
 TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
 DCS: 83 00 c4 00
HDLC underflow in state 3
Changed from phase 4 to 6
Changed from phase 6 to 3
Slow carrier up
 XCN: fa
XCN with final frame tag
In state 4
Disconnecting
Changed from phase 3 to 7
Changed from phase 7 to 8

-- 
  Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems

2004-04-21 Thread Serge Oleinikov
Hi Eric !
I have the same problem with Canon fax mashine as you have.  I have wrote an
email to Steve (developer of spandsp) some weeks ago and got no answer how
to fix the problem :(
Looks like connection was dropped by fax mashine without any reason

- Original Message - 
From: Eric Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 6:19 PM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems


 I'm getting the following when sending to a specific fax machine.  Any
 ideas?

 File name is '/var/spool/asterisk/email2fax/7F2SOeYJiU.tif'
 Changed from phase 0 to 2
 Slow carrier up
 Slow carrier down
 Slow carrier up
  NSF: 20 00 00 11 80 00 8a 49 10 53 54 49 52 4c 49 4e 47 20 43 4f 56
 49 4e 47 54 00 67 00 80 80 80 0c 01 02
 NSF without final frame tag
 The remote is made by 'Canon'
  DIS: 80 20 ee 88 c4 80 95 80 80 80 38
 DIS with final frame tag
 In state 10
 DIS:
 V.8 capable
 Preferred octets: 256
 Can receive fax
 Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK
 2D coding OK
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
 Receiver's minimum scan line time: 20ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
 Error correction mode
 T.6 coding
 R8x15.4lines/mm OK
 R16x15.4lines/mm and/or 400x400pels/25.4 mm OK
 Metric-based resolution preferred
 Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
 North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
 North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)
 Single-progression sequential coding (Rec. T.85) basic
 DCS:
 Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
 2D coding OK
 Scan line length: 215mm
 Recording length: A4 (297mm)
 Minimum scan line time: 20ms
 Start sending document
 Start tx document - compression 2
 Fine mode
 Changed from phase 2 to 4
 Sending ident
  TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
  DCS: 83 00 c4 00
 HDLC underflow in state 3
 Changed from phase 4 to 6
 Changed from phase 6 to 3
 Slow carrier up
  XCN: fa
 XCN with final frame tag
 In state 4
 Disconnecting
 Changed from phase 3 to 7
 Changed from phase 7 to 8

 -- 
   Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
 In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
 upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems

2004-04-21 Thread Eric Wieling
Almost all of our fax machines are Canon, so it's kinda tough to test
TxFax.

On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 11:35, Serge Oleinikov wrote:
 Hi Eric !
 I have the same problem with Canon fax mashine as you have.  I have wrote an
 email to Steve (developer of spandsp) some weeks ago and got no answer how
 to fix the problem :(
 Looks like connection was dropped by fax mashine without any reason
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Eric Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 6:19 PM
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems
 
 
  I'm getting the following when sending to a specific fax machine.  Any
  ideas?
 
  File name is '/var/spool/asterisk/email2fax/7F2SOeYJiU.tif'
  Changed from phase 0 to 2
  Slow carrier up
  Slow carrier down
  Slow carrier up
   NSF: 20 00 00 11 80 00 8a 49 10 53 54 49 52 4c 49 4e 47 20 43 4f 56
  49 4e 47 54 00 67 00 80 80 80 0c 01 02
  NSF without final frame tag
  The remote is made by 'Canon'
   DIS: 80 20 ee 88 c4 80 95 80 80 80 38
  DIS with final frame tag
  In state 10
  DIS:
  V.8 capable
  Preferred octets: 256
  Can receive fax
  Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
  R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK
  2D coding OK
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
  Receiver's minimum scan line time: 20ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
  Error correction mode
  T.6 coding
  R8x15.4lines/mm OK
  R16x15.4lines/mm and/or 400x400pels/25.4 mm OK
  Metric-based resolution preferred
  Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
  North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
  North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)
  Single-progression sequential coding (Rec. T.85) basic
  DCS:
  Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
  2D coding OK
  Scan line length: 215mm
  Recording length: A4 (297mm)
  Minimum scan line time: 20ms
  Start sending document
  Start tx document - compression 2
  Fine mode
  Changed from phase 2 to 4
  Sending ident
   TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
   DCS: 83 00 c4 00
  HDLC underflow in state 3
  Changed from phase 4 to 6
  Changed from phase 6 to 3
  Slow carrier up
   XCN: fa
  XCN with final frame tag
  In state 4
  Disconnecting
  Changed from phase 3 to 7
  Changed from phase 7 to 8
 
  -- 
Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
  In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
  upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
  Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems

2004-04-21 Thread Eric Wieling
It would be VERY nice if TxFax exited with a non-zero return code if the
fax was not actually sent.  In the case of the problem with sending to
the Canon fax machine, this always returns 0:

$status = $AGI-exec(TxFAX, $fax_filename|caller);

On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 12:46, Eric Wieling wrote:
 Almost all of our fax machines are Canon, so it's kinda tough to test
 TxFax.
 
 On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 11:35, Serge Oleinikov wrote:
  Hi Eric !
  I have the same problem with Canon fax mashine as you have.  I have wrote an
  email to Steve (developer of spandsp) some weeks ago and got no answer how
  to fix the problem :(
  Looks like connection was dropped by fax mashine without any reason
  
  - Original Message - 
  From: Eric Wieling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 6:19 PM
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems
  
  
   I'm getting the following when sending to a specific fax machine.  Any
   ideas?
  
   File name is '/var/spool/asterisk/email2fax/7F2SOeYJiU.tif'
   Changed from phase 0 to 2
   Slow carrier up
   Slow carrier down
   Slow carrier up
NSF: 20 00 00 11 80 00 8a 49 10 53 54 49 52 4c 49 4e 47 20 43 4f 56
   49 4e 47 54 00 67 00 80 80 80 0c 01 02
   NSF without final frame tag
   The remote is made by 'Canon'
DIS: 80 20 ee 88 c4 80 95 80 80 80 38
   DIS with final frame tag
   In state 10
   DIS:
   V.8 capable
   Preferred octets: 256
   Can receive fax
   Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17
   R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK
   2D coding OK
   Scan line length: 215mm
   Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm)
   Receiver's minimum scan line time: 20ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
   Error correction mode
   T.6 coding
   R8x15.4lines/mm OK
   R16x15.4lines/mm and/or 400x400pels/25.4 mm OK
   Metric-based resolution preferred
   Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
   North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm)
   North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm)
   Single-progression sequential coding (Rec. T.85) basic
   DCS:
   Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
   2D coding OK
   Scan line length: 215mm
   Recording length: A4 (297mm)
   Minimum scan line time: 20ms
   Start sending document
   Start tx document - compression 2
   Fine mode
   Changed from phase 2 to 4
   Sending ident
TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
DCS: 83 00 c4 00
   HDLC underflow in state 3
   Changed from phase 4 to 6
   Changed from phase 6 to 3
   Slow carrier up
XCN: fa
   XCN with final frame tag
   In state 4
   Disconnecting
   Changed from phase 3 to 7
   Changed from phase 7 to 8
  
   -- 
 Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
   In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
   upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
  
   ___
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
  Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111
In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows
upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users