Re: [blfs-support] BLFS-9.0, BLFS-9.1, BLFS-SVN: xorgproto
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 21:25:02 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 08:00:39AM -0400, Scott Andrews via > blfs-support wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:06:34 +0100 > > Ken Moffat via blfs-support > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 08:01:18PM -0400, Scott Andrews via > > > blfs-support wrote: > > > > > > > If you never need to build multilib (e.g. 32-bit and 64-bit) then > > > moving them should not cause you any trouble. > > > > > > Looking at Arch for xorgproto, the only pc file that I see > > > mentioned at > > > https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/blob/packages/xorgproto/trunk/PKGBUILD > > > is applewmproto.pc which they remove as part of cleaning up the > > > apple stuff. I don't see any mention of the other pc files being > > > moved. > > > > > > Similarly, fedora, mandriva cooker are using /usr/share. > > > > > > ĸen > > > > They are in /usr/share/pkgconfig > > > > Indeed, and yet your original post implied that Arch were installing > them in /usr/lib/pkgconfig: > > | *.pc files in wrong directory > | > | install -m755 -d /usr/lib > | mv /usr/share/pkgconfig /usr/lib/ > > > Name: xorgproto > > Version : 2019.1 > > Release : 1 > > Architecture: armv7hnl > > Install Date: (not installed) > > Group : Xorg > > Size: 4060717 > > License : Other > > Signature : (none) > > Source RPM : xorgproto-2019.1-1.src.rpm > > Build Date : Fri Aug 28 11:53:31 2020 > > Build Host : rpi.example.org > > Relocations : (not relocatable) > > Vendor : Octothorpe > > URL : https://xorg.freedesktop.org/ > > Summary : Combined X.Org X11 Protocol headers > > Description : > > Combined X.Org X11 Protocol headers > > > > [ putolin ] > > > > An interesting word for snipping, somebody by another name used > that. I have no problem with whatever language people wish to use, > merely mentioning it. > > > /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-kbproto > > Licenses can reasonably go into /usr/share/licenses (in BLFS we do > not explicitly install them if the package does not automatically do > that - but for anyone who provides a binary package that is a good > idea). Not material > > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/bigreqsproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/compositeproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/damageproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/dmxproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/dri2proto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/dri3proto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/fixesproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/fontsproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/glproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/inputproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/kbproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/presentproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/randrproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/recordproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/renderproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/resourceproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/scrnsaverproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/videoproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/windowswmproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xcmiscproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xextproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xf86bigfontproto.pc > > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xf86dgaproto.pc > > But you started by saying that /usr/share/pkgconfig is the wrong > directory. That is correct, But. You said they were in /usr/lib/pkgconfig, they are in /usr/share/pkgconfig. I rebuilt the package according to BLFS and posted the result. > > Those all match the canonical Arch install at > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/xorgproto/ I moved them to were they should be, for consistency > I repeat: you can do what you want for pkgconfig files on a > non-multilib build. But saying that Arch are installing them in > /usr/lib is at best misleading. The ones that are in /usr/share/pkgconfig are not architecture specific at least the packages I have built. That means it is NOT an issue on multilib. Who does that? How many people even run multilib? > > ĸen -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] BLFS-9.0, BLFS-9.1, BLFS-SVN: xorgproto
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 08:00:39AM -0400, Scott Andrews via blfs-support wrote: > On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:06:34 +0100 > Ken Moffat via blfs-support > wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 08:01:18PM -0400, Scott Andrews via > > blfs-support wrote: > > > > If you never need to build multilib (e.g. 32-bit and 64-bit) then > > moving them should not cause you any trouble. > > > > Looking at Arch for xorgproto, the only pc file that I see mentioned > > at > > https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/blob/packages/xorgproto/trunk/PKGBUILD > > is applewmproto.pc which they remove as part of cleaning up the > > apple stuff. I don't see any mention of the other pc files being > > moved. > > > > Similarly, fedora, mandriva cooker are using /usr/share. > > > > ĸen > > They are in /usr/share/pkgconfig > Indeed, and yet your original post implied that Arch were installing them in /usr/lib/pkgconfig: | *.pc files in wrong directory | | install -m755 -d /usr/lib | mv /usr/share/pkgconfig /usr/lib/ > Name: xorgproto > Version : 2019.1 > Release : 1 > Architecture: armv7hnl > Install Date: (not installed) > Group : Xorg > Size: 4060717 > License : Other > Signature : (none) > Source RPM : xorgproto-2019.1-1.src.rpm > Build Date : Fri Aug 28 11:53:31 2020 > Build Host : rpi.example.org > Relocations : (not relocatable) > Vendor : Octothorpe > URL : https://xorg.freedesktop.org/ > Summary : Combined X.Org X11 Protocol headers > Description : > Combined X.Org X11 Protocol headers > > [ putolin ] > An interesting word for snipping, somebody by another name used that. I have no problem with whatever language people wish to use, merely mentioning it. > /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-kbproto Licenses can reasonably go into /usr/share/licenses (in BLFS we do not explicitly install them if the package does not automatically do that - but for anyone who provides a binary package that is a good idea). > /usr/share/pkgconfig/bigreqsproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/compositeproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/damageproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/dmxproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/dri2proto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/dri3proto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/fixesproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/fontsproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/glproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/inputproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/kbproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/presentproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/randrproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/recordproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/renderproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/resourceproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/scrnsaverproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/videoproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/windowswmproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xcmiscproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xextproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xf86bigfontproto.pc > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xf86dgaproto.pc But you started by saying that /usr/share/pkgconfig is the wrong directory. Those all match the canonical Arch install at https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/xorgproto/ I repeat: you can do what you want for pkgconfig files on a non-multilib build. But saying that Arch are installing them in /usr/lib is at best misleading. ĸen -- Juliet's version of cleanliness was next to godliness, which was to say it was erratic, past all understanding and was seldom seen. -- Unseen Academicals -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] BLFS-9.0, BLFS-9.1, BLFS-SVN: xorgproto
On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 02:06:34 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 08:01:18PM -0400, Scott Andrews via > blfs-support wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:46:52 +0100 > > Ken Moffat via blfs-support > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 05:32:37PM -0400, Scott Andrews via > > > blfs-support wrote: > > > > > > > > *.pc files in wrong directory > > > > > > > > install -m755 -d /usr/lib > > > > mv /usr/share/pkgconfig /usr/lib/ > > > > > > No. /usr/share/pkgconfig was introduced many years ago, for > > > pkgconfig files which are not architecture-specific. My oldest > > > remaining logs are from LFS-7.1, and at that time iso-codes, udev, > > > shared-mime-info, dbus, xbitmaps, util-macros were among the > > > packages using it. > > > > > > ĸen > > > > Most distros are moving them, check archlinux for one > > If you never need to build multilib (e.g. 32-bit and 64-bit) then > moving them should not cause you any trouble. > > Looking at Arch for xorgproto, the only pc file that I see mentioned > at > https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/blob/packages/xorgproto/trunk/PKGBUILD > is applewmproto.pc which they remove as part of cleaning up the > apple stuff. I don't see any mention of the other pc files being > moved. > > Similarly, fedora, mandriva cooker are using /usr/share. > > ĸen They are in /usr/share/pkgconfig Name: xorgproto Version : 2019.1 Release : 1 Architecture: armv7hnl Install Date: (not installed) Group : Xorg Size: 4060717 License : Other Signature : (none) Source RPM : xorgproto-2019.1-1.src.rpm Build Date : Fri Aug 28 11:53:31 2020 Build Host : rpi.example.org Relocations : (not relocatable) Vendor : Octothorpe URL : https://xorg.freedesktop.org/ Summary : Combined X.Org X11 Protocol headers Description : Combined X.Org X11 Protocol headers [ putolin ] /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-kbproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-pmproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-presentproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-randrproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-recordproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-renderproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-resourceproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-scrnsaverproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-trapproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-videoproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-x11proto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-xcmiscproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-xextproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-xf86bigfontproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-xf86dgaproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-xf86driproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-xf86miscproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-xf86vidmodeproto /usr/share/licenses/xorgproto/COPYING-xineramaproto /usr/share/pkgconfig/bigreqsproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/compositeproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/damageproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/dmxproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/dri2proto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/dri3proto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/fixesproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/fontsproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/glproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/inputproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/kbproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/presentproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/randrproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/recordproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/renderproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/resourceproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/scrnsaverproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/videoproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/windowswmproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/xcmiscproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/xextproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/xf86bigfontproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig/xf86dgaproto.pc /usr/share/pkgconfig -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] BLFS-9.0, BLFS-9.1, BLFS-SVN: xorgproto
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 08:01:18PM -0400, Scott Andrews via blfs-support wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:46:52 +0100 > Ken Moffat via blfs-support > wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 05:32:37PM -0400, Scott Andrews via > > blfs-support wrote: > > > > > > *.pc files in wrong directory > > > > > > install -m755 -d /usr/lib > > > mv /usr/share/pkgconfig /usr/lib/ > > > > No. /usr/share/pkgconfig was introduced many years ago, for > > pkgconfig files which are not architecture-specific. My oldest > > remaining logs are from LFS-7.1, and at that time iso-codes, udev, > > shared-mime-info, dbus, xbitmaps, util-macros were among the > > packages using it. > > > > ĸen > > Most distros are moving them, check archlinux for one If you never need to build multilib (e.g. 32-bit and 64-bit) then moving them should not cause you any trouble. Looking at Arch for xorgproto, the only pc file that I see mentioned at https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-packages/blob/packages/xorgproto/trunk/PKGBUILD is applewmproto.pc which they remove as part of cleaning up the apple stuff. I don't see any mention of the other pc files being moved. Similarly, fedora, mandriva cooker are using /usr/share. ĸen -- Juliet's version of cleanliness was next to godliness, which was to say it was erratic, past all understanding and was seldom seen. -- Unseen Academicals -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] BLFS-9.0, BLFS-9.1, BLFS-SVN: xorgproto
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 22:46:52 +0100 Ken Moffat via blfs-support wrote: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 05:32:37PM -0400, Scott Andrews via > blfs-support wrote: > > > > *.pc files in wrong directory > > > > install -m755 -d /usr/lib > > mv /usr/share/pkgconfig /usr/lib/ > > No. /usr/share/pkgconfig was introduced many years ago, for > pkgconfig files which are not architecture-specific. My oldest > remaining logs are from LFS-7.1, and at that time iso-codes, udev, > shared-mime-info, dbus, xbitmaps, util-macros were among the > packages using it. > > ĸen Most distros are moving them, check archlinux for one -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-support] BLFS-9.0, BLFS-9.1, BLFS-SVN: xorgproto
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 05:32:37PM -0400, Scott Andrews via blfs-support wrote: > > *.pc files in wrong directory > > install -m755 -d /usr/lib > mv /usr/share/pkgconfig /usr/lib/ No. /usr/share/pkgconfig was introduced many years ago, for pkgconfig files which are not architecture-specific. My oldest remaining logs are from LFS-7.1, and at that time iso-codes, udev, shared-mime-info, dbus, xbitmaps, util-macros were among the packages using it. ĸen -- Juliet's version of cleanliness was next to godliness, which was to say it was erratic, past all understanding and was seldom seen. -- Unseen Academicals -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
