Worst President ever?

2005-12-04 Thread Gary Denton
The History News Network at George Mason University has just polled
historians informally on the Bush record. Four hundred and fifteen,
about a third of those contacted, answered -- maybe they were all
crazed liberals -- making the project as unofficial as it was
interesting. These were the results: 338 said they believed Bush was
failing, while 77 said he was succeeding. Fifty said they thought he
was the worst president ever. Worse than Buchanan.

This is what those historians said -- and it should be noted that some
of the criticism about deficit spending and misuse of the military
came from self-identified conservatives -- about the Bush record:

He has taken the country into an unwinnable war and alienated friend
and foe alike in the process;

He is bankrupting the country with a combination of aggressive
military spending and reduced taxation of the rich;

He has deliberately and dangerously attacked separation of church and state;

He has repeatedly misled, to use a kind word, the American people on
affairs domestic and foreign;

He has proved to be incompetent in affairs domestic (New Orleans) and
foreign ( Iraq and the battle against al-Qaida);

He has sacrificed American employment (including the toleration of
pension and benefit elimination) to increase overall productivity;

He is ignorantly hostile to science and technological progress;

He has tolerated or ignored one of the republic's oldest problems,
corporate cheating in supplying the military in wartime.

Still, while the great majority said he was failing as president less
than 15% were willing now to say he was the worst president.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ucrr/20051203/cm_ucrr/isgeorgebushtheworstpresidentever
--
Gary Denton
http://www.apollocon.org  June 23-25, 2006
The budget should be balanced; the treasury should be refilled; public
debt should be reduced; and the arrogance of public officials should be
controlled. -Cicero. 106-43 B.C.
Easter Lemming Liberal News Digest -
http://elemming2.blogspot.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Andrew Paul
I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate
so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there is
no-one to staunchly dispute the centrist viewpoints we all seem to
espouse (Dan excepted). There is no right answer, we surely all know
that, but the debate to find one must go on, or we sink into
self-absorbed narcissism.

Other things are going on too. Is this the victory of Osama, that we are
so focused on fear that we forget the future?

My Belly Button Fluff Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Doug Pensinger
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:57:22 +1100, Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:



I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate
so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there is
no-one to staunchly dispute the centrist viewpoints we all seem to
espouse (Dan excepted). There is no right answer, we surely all know
that, but the debate to find one must go on, or we sink into
self-absorbed narcissism.

Other things are going on too. Is this the victory of Osama, that we are
so focused on fear that we forget the future?

My Belly Button Fluff Maru


I think that it is important that we debate Iraq and believe that part of 
the reason that supporters of the administration contribute to the debate 
is that their position has become so indefensable.


All that being said, I agree that there are many other interesting things 
to discuss and the list has become far too quiet.


Pump it up, people!

--
Doug
Reading The Algebraist and Olympus, recently finished The Half Blood 
Prince and The Baroque Cycle (Stephenson trilogy)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Brin: left-right inanities

2005-12-04 Thread Doug Pensinger

Robert wrote:


Seconded!
I follow blogs almost exclusively via RSS/XML/ATOM.

Doc, if you have not tried an RSS reader, you owe yourself the
pleasure of the experience. RSS readers aggregate all your news into
one handy dandy program that updates your news/blogs automatically.

Info: http://tinyurl.com/9fxfe


Did you mean to send a Google search?  Can you (or anyone else) suggest a 
particular site?



--
Doug
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Robert Seeberger
Andrew Paul wrote:
 I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate 
 debate
 so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there 
 is
 no-one to staunchly dispute the centrist viewpoints we all seem to
 espouse (Dan excepted). There is no right answer, we surely all know
 that, but the debate to find one must go on, or we sink into
 self-absorbed narcissism.

Are you implying that we are not full-on narcissists?



 Other things are going on too. Is this the victory of Osama, that we
 are so focused on fear that we forget the future?


At worst there is a detente, at best we are having some difficulties 
putting Al-Quaeda down.



xponent
Stormbringer Maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Julia Thompson

Doug Pensinger wrote:
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:57:22 +1100, Andrew Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:



I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate
so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there is
no-one to staunchly dispute the centrist viewpoints we all seem to
espouse (Dan excepted). There is no right answer, we surely all know
that, but the debate to find one must go on, or we sink into
self-absorbed narcissism.

Other things are going on too. Is this the victory of Osama, that we are
so focused on fear that we forget the future?

My Belly Button Fluff Maru



I think that it is important that we debate Iraq and believe that part 
of the reason that supporters of the administration contribute to the 
debate is that their position has become so indefensable.


All that being said, I agree that there are many other interesting 
things to discuss and the list has become far too quiet.


Pump it up, people!


I *know* JDG has been extremely busy lately.  (I was hoping he'd come 
back to active posting before football season ended, but it's looking 
like he won't.)


I'm not going to jump into the Iraq debate except to ask for 
clarifications.  I have too many other things on my plate at the moment 
that are more important to me than formulating arguments one way or 
another for anything having to do with that.  (People currently not 
caring for several small children will probably have a different set of 
priorities, as they should.)


Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Andrew Paul
 On Behalf Of Doug Pensinger
 
 On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:57:22 +1100, Andrew Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate
debate
  so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there
is
  no-one to staunchly dispute the centrist viewpoints we all seem to
  espouse (Dan excepted). There is no right answer, we surely all know
  that, but the debate to find one must go on, or we sink into
  self-absorbed narcissism.
 
  Other things are going on too. Is this the victory of Osama, that we
are
  so focused on fear that we forget the future?
 
  My Belly Button Fluff Maru
 
 I think that it is important that we debate Iraq and believe that part
of
 the reason that supporters of the administration contribute to the
debate
 is that their position has become so indefensable.

That may be so, but then I thought they had some valid points. And it's
a reality. At least we could debate solutions.

Paradox Maru

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Brin: left-right inanities

2005-12-04 Thread Robert Seeberger
Doug Pensinger wrote:
 Robert wrote:

 Seconded!
 I follow blogs almost exclusively via RSS/XML/ATOM.

 Doc, if you have not tried an RSS reader, you owe yourself the
 pleasure of the experience. RSS readers aggregate all your news 
 into
 one handy dandy program that updates your news/blogs automatically.

 Info: http://tinyurl.com/9fxfe

 Did you mean to send a Google search?

Yes.I knew Doc is a MacDude so I figured he could decide what was 
good for himself. I know jack bout Mac.G


Can you (or anyone else)
 suggest a particular site?

I use RSSReader 1.0.88.0 and am quite happy with it.
http://www.rssreader.com/

But there are plenty of alternatives. (I'm thinking of getting a 
second reader and using one for blogs and the other for news)
Some people use a Yahoo syndication page (I dislike this myself)
http://my.yahoo.com/

Otherwise just look through the links on the search page I sent and 
find something you like.


What I do is use the RSS reader as a base and if it shows me something 
interesting I get it to take me to the webpage,but if it only 
generates idle curiousity I view it in the reader itself. RSS readers 
add some flexibility to ones infosurfing habits


xponent
Surfing Toward The Ur-Singularity Maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Brin: left-right inanities

2005-12-04 Thread Richard Baker

Rob said:


Yes.I knew Doc is a MacDude so I figured he could decide what was
good for himself. I know jack bout Mac.G


I would highly recommend NetNewsWire for OS X:

http://ranchero.com/netnewswire/

Rich

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Brin: left-right inanities

2005-12-04 Thread David Brin

RSS readers aggregate
 all your news into
  one handy dandy program that updates your
 news/blogs automatically.


There is a page in EARTH (written in 1988) that
predicts this), the book's 18th hit

ANy of you interested in nature or teachig?  drop by: 
http://www.cabscience.com/index.html
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


My annual Xmas tirade... Was RE: An armed society ...

2005-12-04 Thread Gary Nunn
 
Mr. House Of Pain Maru wrote...
Wishes may never become fishes, and unfortunate as it may be, 
people most often are not polite unless there is some 
overriding reason to be polite.


Rob's wisdom is a great segue into my Annual Christmas Rant.

For the first time in my work career, I had to work the Friday after
Thanksgiving. That in itself wasn't a big deal as I had volunteered to work
it so some of my co-workers could go out of town for Thanksgiving.

Driving to work, at 5:00 am that morning was a REAL eye-opener.  I was
astounded at the number of people at the Super Wal-Mart. I made the mistake
of stopping there to pick up donuts on the way to work, and I was left
speechless at just how rude and inconsiderate people were. I'm not just
talking about one or two people, I'm talking about a majority of people.
People were impatient and rude in the parking lot. Quick to cut someone off
just to save a few steps and get 3 or 4 parking spaces closer. They were
quick to honk their horns over and over if you didn't move the microsecond
the light turned green, and of course they were quick to scream out the
window or give the one finger salute - most had kids in the car.

In the store, grown adults, were shoving and being rude in the toy
department and especially electronics, because they just had to get that
certain, popular toy. Others, amazingly, brought kids with them to shop and
were screaming at them, to shut up and no you can't have any toys. What
are these people thinking when they bring young children to shop for others
and then are mean and nasty to the kids because they naturally want toys
that they see?

The REALLY popular item around here this year is the Nintendo DS Nintendogs
Best Friends edition. It was made it VERY limited quantities and advertised
like your would not believe, and I saw two grown adults, arguing and
screaming at the unfortunate teenage Wal-Mart employee, about who saw the
very last one, first. 

Naturally, my daughter wants one of the special edition Nintendo DS games,
but there was NO WAY that I was going to join the feeding frenzy and act
like an idiot.  My son's mom (my daughter and son have different moms) , who
makes sure her kids always have the latest and greatest, paid almost twice
the price by buying the game and cartridge separately. She paid over $100
for the game cartridge on eBay. The game itself was a limited edition color
and the cartridge was only available in the Special Limited Edition
bundle, and was being sold on eBay by people who bought the game, but didn't
want the cartridge.  Saying that I am astounded would be an understatement.

What's the point, if everyone is going to be rude and nasty?  Perhaps I had
a sheltered life, but growing up in the 70's, I NEVER remember anyone being
rude, like I have seen in the last few years.

Even now, when I go to a store now, I see the same things, maybe not as
intense as the day after Thanksgiving, but still nasty and rude.

So what is the cause?  Why the change? Is it because people don't have
patience any more? Is it because manufactures create an artificial shortage
of popular products to sell other products when the Limited Editions sell
out?

It seems to be getting worse every year.

climbing off my soapbox

Gary

PS - Quite by accident, one night a few days ago, I ran across one of the
rare and coveted Nintendo DS Nintendog Best Friends edition bundle at
Meijers The very last one, on sale no less, and I didn't have to act like a
rude inconsiderate idiot to get it. :-)





___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


My annual Xmas tirade... Was RE: An armed society ...

2005-12-04 Thread Jim Sharkey

Gary Nunn wrote:
Is it because manufactures create an artificial shortage
of popular products to sell other products when the Limited 
Editions sell out?

In my opinion, it's because far too many parents feel that they have
to purchase their children's love.  My understanding is that a full
10% of the XBox 360's sold in the USA have been sold on eBay.  For
between $600 and $700 apiece, or a 100% markup.  Had I known, I'd 
have ordered two, sold one, and essentially got one for free.

I don't know exactly *how* the monster got created, but I do know
there doesn't seem to be any way to put it back in its cave.

On a related note, I consider myself lucky to live in a working class
neighborhood.  The pressure on my kids to keep up with the Joneses is
nearly non-existent.

Jim

___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 09:53 AM Sunday 12/4/2005, Doug Pensinger wrote:
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:57:22 +1100, Andrew Paul 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate
so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there is
no-one to staunchly dispute the centrist viewpoints we all seem to
espouse (Dan excepted). There is no right answer, we surely all know
that, but the debate to find one must go on, or we sink into
self-absorbed narcissism.

Other things are going on too. Is this the victory of Osama, that we are
so focused on fear that we forget the future?

My Belly Button Fluff Maru


I think that it is important that we debate Iraq and believe that 
part of the reason that supporters of the administration contribute 
to the debate is that their position has become so indefensable.




Alternatively, that many people on both sides of the debate have 
concluded that no one on the other side is even listening to them any 
more, much less is likely to change his/her mind . . .


(I've seen similar things on other lists wrt other topics.)



All that being said, I agree that there are many other interesting 
things to discuss and the list has become far too quiet.


Pump it up, people!

--
Doug
Reading The Algebraist and Olympus, recently finished The Half Blood 
Prince and The Baroque Cycle (Stephenson trilogy)




Does it ever get fixed?



When In Doubt, Pun Maru


--Ronn!  :)

Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country 
and two words have been added to the pledge of Allegiance... UNDER 
GOD.  Wouldn't it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer and that 
would be eliminated from schools too?

   -- Red Skelton




___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 10:10 AM Sunday 12/4/2005, Julia Thompson wrote:

Doug Pensinger wrote:
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 00:57:22 +1100, Andrew Paul 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



I hate how terrorism and the war in Iraq have come to dominate debate
so. I notice that Gautam and JDG rarely post these days, and there is
no-one to staunchly dispute the centrist viewpoints we all seem to
espouse (Dan excepted). There is no right answer, we surely all know
that, but the debate to find one must go on, or we sink into
self-absorbed narcissism.

Other things are going on too. Is this the victory of Osama, that we are
so focused on fear that we forget the future?

My Belly Button Fluff Maru


I think that it is important that we debate Iraq and believe that 
part of the reason that supporters of the administration contribute 
to the debate is that their position has become so indefensable.
All that being said, I agree that there are many other interesting 
things to discuss and the list has become far too quiet.

Pump it up, people!


I *know* JDG has been extremely busy lately.  (I was hoping he'd 
come back to active posting before football season ended, but it's 
looking like he won't.)


I'm not going to jump into the Iraq debate except to ask for 
clarifications.  I have too many other things




Would that number be 3?



on my plate at the moment that are more important to me than 
formulating arguments one way or another for anything having to do 
with that.  (People currently not caring for several small children 
will probably have a different set of priorities, as they should.)


Julia






--Ronn!  :)

Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country 
and two words have been added to the pledge of Allegiance... UNDER 
GOD.  Wouldn't it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer and that 
would be eliminated from schools too?

   -- Red Skelton




___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: My annual Xmas tirade... Was RE: An armed society ...

2005-12-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 01:16 PM Sunday 12/4/2005, Gary Nunn wrote:


Mr. House Of Pain Maru wrote...
Wishes may never become fishes, and unfortunate as it may be,
people most often are not polite unless there is some
overriding reason to be polite.


Rob's wisdom is a great segue into my Annual Christmas Rant.

For the first time in my work career, I had to work the Friday after
Thanksgiving. That in itself wasn't a big deal as I had volunteered to work
it so some of my co-workers could go out of town for Thanksgiving.

Driving to work, at 5:00 am that morning was a REAL eye-opener.  I was
astounded at the number of people at the Super Wal-Mart. I made the mistake
of stopping there to pick up donuts on the way to work, and I was left
speechless at just how rude and inconsiderate people were. I'm not just
talking about one or two people, I'm talking about a majority of people.
People were impatient and rude in the parking lot. Quick to cut someone off
just to save a few steps and get 3 or 4 parking spaces closer. They were
quick to honk their horns over and over if you didn't move the microsecond
the light turned green, and of course they were quick to scream out the
window or give the one finger salute - most had kids in the car.

In the store, grown adults, were shoving and being rude in the toy
department and especially electronics, because they just had to get that
certain, popular toy. Others, amazingly, brought kids with them to shop and
were screaming at them, to shut up and no you can't have any toys. What
are these people thinking when they bring young children to shop for others
and then are mean and nasty to the kids because they naturally want toys
that they see?




Maybe they could not find a baby sitter (perhaps 'cuz everyone else 
they could call also wanted to be at Wal-Mart at 0500) and so had to 
bring the kids with them.





The REALLY popular item around here this year is the Nintendo DS Nintendogs
Best Friends edition. It was made it VERY limited quantities and advertised
like your would not believe, and I saw two grown adults, arguing and
screaming at the unfortunate teenage Wal-Mart employee, about who saw the
very last one, first.




Think about those poor employees, having to get up in time to have 
the store open at 0500 (or 0100, as some of the stores around here 
have done in the past) on what for many is a long holiday 
weekend.  But then for several years now stores like K-Mart and 
others have been open on Thanksgiving Day and running special sales 
that were only good that day.  (Maybe that is their attempt to get a 
jump on Wal-Mart, which locally at least is closed on Thanksgiving Day itself.)





Naturally, my daughter wants one of the special edition Nintendo DS games,
but there was NO WAY that I was going to join the feeding frenzy and act
like an idiot.  My son's mom (my daughter and son have different moms) , who
makes sure her kids always have the latest and greatest, paid almost twice
the price by buying the game and cartridge separately. She paid over $100
for the game cartridge on eBay. The game itself was a limited edition color
and the cartridge was only available in the Special Limited Edition
bundle, and was being sold on eBay by people who bought the game, but didn't
want the cartridge.  Saying that I am astounded would be an understatement.




Several years ago when Tickle Me Elmo was the hot, 
impossible-to-find item, I responded by getting one of the little 
5-inch-or-so-high Elmos, tying a noose around its neck, and hanging 
it from the post my mailbox is attached to with a sign that said 
TICKLE THIS! pinned to its chest as part of my holiday decorations 
. . . (I suppose it may still be in a bag somewhere with other 
decorations where I put them after taking them down.)


(Haven't figured out a way to do anything similar with an Xbox . . . 
at least not for a financial outlay comparable to that of the 
miniature Elmo . . .)





What's the point, if everyone is going to be rude and nasty?  Perhaps I had
a sheltered life, but growing up in the 70's, I NEVER remember anyone being
rude, like I have seen in the last few years.

Even now, when I go to a store now, I see the same things, maybe not as
intense as the day after Thanksgiving, but still nasty and rude.

So what is the cause?  Why the change? Is it because people don't have
patience any more? Is it because manufactures create an artificial shortage
of popular products to sell other products when the Limited Editions sell
out?




IMO, that (your last sentence) is a big part of it.  Also, notice how 
much free advertising the national and local news on Thanksgiving and 
the following days give to those sales and their results.  Me, I stay 
away from all the stores on Black Friday in protest.  Of course, I 
don't have little ones who have been programmed by TV and their peers 
to demand that hot, impossible-to-find item, either . . .





It seems to be getting worse every year.

climbing off my soapbox

Gary

PS 

Re: Brin: left-right inanities

2005-12-04 Thread Max Battcher

Doug Pensinger wrote:
Did you mean to send a Google search?  Can you (or anyone else) suggest 
a particular site?


There are as many ways to read RSS as there are people.  My email client 
(Thunderbird) supports it out of the box and makes RSS reading like 
email reading, that's my preferred way.  Other people like the way their 
browser (Firefox) handles RSS (live bookmarks).


On the opposite end of things is something like Bloglines or 
Reader.Google.com.


There are a veritable ton of RSS readers out there.

--
--Max Battcher--
http://www.worldmaker.net/
History bleeds for tomorrow / for us to realize and never more follow 
blind --Machinae Supremacy, Deus Ex Machinae, Title Track

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Defeat in Victory

2005-12-04 Thread Julia Thompson

Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

At 10:10 AM Sunday 12/4/2005, Julia Thompson wrote:

I'm not going to jump into the Iraq debate except to ask for 
clarifications.  I have too many other things





Would that number be 3?


Well, after Dan's outpatient procedure on Tuesday, it was more like 4 
for a few days there.  :P  Plus there's a room that needs to be cleaned 
out, half a garage that needs to be cleaned out, and as much of this as 
possible done by noon on Saturday.


Suffice to say, my RL is going to be just a letle hectic for the 
next few days.  (Probably not going to let up until a day or two after 
Christmas, actually.  I think I want to declare the 27th reading day 
and just encourage everyone to spend as much time as possible with 
books.  Tommy will love that as long as he gets read aloud to often enough.)


on my plate at the moment that are more important to me than 
formulating arguments one way or another for anything having to do 
with that.  (People currently not caring for several small children 
will probably have a different set of priorities, as they should.)


Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: My annual Xmas tirade... Was RE: An armed society ...

2005-12-04 Thread Julia Thompson

Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

At 01:16 PM Sunday 12/4/2005, Gary Nunn wrote:


What
are these people thinking when they bring young children to shop for 
others

and then are mean and nasty to the kids because they naturally want toys
that they see?





Maybe they could not find a baby sitter (perhaps 'cuz everyone else they 
could call also wanted to be at Wal-Mart at 0500) and so had to bring 
the kids with them.


Hm.  My kids' daddy doesn't WANT to be at Wal-Mart on that day. 
(Neither do I, come to think of it.)  So if I really want to be at 
Wal-Mart the minute it opens, gee, I can leave the kids at home with him.


Are some of these parents divorced?

(Also, who gets a kid up that early anyway?  You don't want to ENCOURAGE 
them to be up at 4AM!)


Naturally, my daughter wants one of the special edition Nintendo DS 
games,

but there was NO WAY that I was going to join the feeding frenzy and act
like an idiot.  My son's mom (my daughter and son have different moms) 
, who
makes sure her kids always have the latest and greatest, paid almost 
twice

the price by buying the game and cartridge separately. She paid over $100
for the game cartridge on eBay. The game itself was a limited edition 
color

and the cartridge was only available in the Special Limited Edition
bundle, and was being sold on eBay by people who bought the game, but 
didn't
want the cartridge.  Saying that I am astounded would be an 
understatement.





Several years ago when Tickle Me Elmo was the hot, impossible-to-find 
item, I responded by getting one of the little 5-inch-or-so-high Elmos, 
tying a noose around its neck, and hanging it from the post my mailbox 
is attached to with a sign that said TICKLE THIS! pinned to its chest 
as part of my holiday decorations . . . (I suppose it may still be in a 
bag somewhere with other decorations where I put them after taking them 
down.)


Heh.  I sold a used one for $5 a couple of months ago.  (Elmo gets 
annoying after awhile.  They've managed to break the Hokey Pokey Elmo. 
 Unfortunately, what broke wasn't the part that controls the singing.)


(Haven't figured out a way to do anything similar with an Xbox . . . at 
least not for a financial outlay comparable to that of the miniature 
Elmo . . .)


If you had the use of one for an afternoon, to take measurements, you 
could probably make a decent mock-up out of cardboard, masking tape and 
paint, couldn't you?


Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: My annual Xmas tirade... Was RE: An armed society ...

2005-12-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 11:54 PM Sunday 12/4/2005, Julia Thompson wrote:

Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

At 01:16 PM Sunday 12/4/2005, Gary Nunn wrote:


What
are these people thinking when they bring young children to shop for others
and then are mean and nasty to the kids because they naturally want toys
that they see?



Maybe they could not find a baby sitter (perhaps 'cuz everyone else 
they could call also wanted to be at Wal-Mart at 0500) and so had 
to bring the kids with them.


Hm.  My kids' daddy doesn't WANT to be at Wal-Mart on that day. 
(Neither do I, come to think of it.)  So if I really want to be at 
Wal-Mart the minute it opens, gee, I can leave the kids at home with him.


Are some of these parents divorced?




Or possibly never married in the first place.



(Also, who gets a kid up that early anyway?  You don't want to 
ENCOURAGE them to be up at 4AM!)



Naturally, my daughter wants one of the special edition Nintendo DS games,
but there was NO WAY that I was going to join the feeding frenzy and act
like an idiot.  My son's mom (my daughter and son have different moms) , who
makes sure her kids always have the latest and greatest, paid almost twice
the price by buying the game and cartridge separately. She paid over $100
for the game cartridge on eBay. The game itself was a limited edition color
and the cartridge was only available in the Special Limited Edition
bundle, and was being sold on eBay by people who bought the game, but didn't
want the cartridge.  Saying that I am astounded would be an understatement.



Several years ago when Tickle Me Elmo was the hot, 
impossible-to-find item, I responded by getting one of the little 
5-inch-or-so-high Elmos, tying a noose around its neck, and hanging 
it from the post my mailbox is attached to with a sign that said 
TICKLE THIS! pinned to its chest as part of my holiday 
decorations . . . (I suppose it may still be in a bag somewhere 
with other decorations where I put them after taking them down.)


Heh.  I sold a used one for $5 a couple of months ago.  (Elmo gets 
annoying after awhile.




About .001 seconds, if it makes noise and you are over a certain age . . .



  They've managed to break the Hokey Pokey Elmo.  Unfortunately, 
what broke wasn't the part that controls the singing.)




I dated a girl who wanted me to pick anything I wanted for our 
song.  For some reason, she seemed disappointed when I chose the 
hokey Pokey . . .




(Haven't figured out a way to do anything similar with an Xbox . . 
. at least not for a financial outlay comparable to that of the 
miniature Elmo . . .)


If you had the use of one for an afternoon, to take measurements, 
you could probably make a decent mock-up out of cardboard, masking 
tape and paint, couldn't you?




Assuming I had nothing else to do . . .


--Ronn!  :)

Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country 
and two words have been added to the pledge of Allegiance... UNDER 
GOD.  Wouldn't it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer and that 
would be eliminated from schools too?

   -- Red Skelton




___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RepubliKlan Amerika:Valtrex

2005-12-04 Thread The Fool
http://www.livejournal.com/users/triggur/104525.html

I know a young woman who has the misfortune to have contracted genital
herpes.

She is on a daily regimen of Valtrex to prevent symptoms from
manifesting themselves.

Recently she took her prescription to a pharmacist who was apparently a
fundamentalist Christian.

Not only did he refuse to fill the prescription, but he tore it up and
handed it back to her, saying, God is punishing you for your sin.

--
Morality is not the basis of the governance of the state. 
Machiaveli noted that. Those who attempt to govern the state 
for moral ends, find themselves committing immoral acts and 
rarely achieve moral ends. The basis of government is the 
monopoly of organized violence and the supremacy of force. 
This is inherently immoral or amoral at the best. 

The virtues of the state are the virtues of ethics and not 
of morality. We seek to have an ethical state and not a 
moral one. This is supremely difficult for most men to 
grasp, for morality is sentimental and parochial and ethics 
is dispassionate and relative.

People always ask that the state should be moral. But then 
the question arises, whose morality? And it turns out that 
there are many different moralities and they all end up 
squabbling over whose shall dominate. And then madmen and 
scoundrels promise each side that theirs shall triumph in 
order to gain power and distribute favor and use the state 
for their own gain.

The definition of the ethical state is that it should treat 
all equally unfairly, high or low, rich or poor, regardless 
of color or gender, living or dead. Because it is impossible 
to make everyone happy all the time, but it is possible to 
treat everyone unfairly all the time.

That is the function of the state, which is to create 
unhappiness, and it succeeds when it gives everyone an equal 
measure. Morality therefore is far removed from any such 
discussion.
--Oldman (RIP) BopNews
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: RepubliKlan Amerika:Valtrex

2005-12-04 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

At 12:36 AM Monday 12/5/2005, The Fool wrote:

http://www.livejournal.com/users/triggur/104525.html

I know a young woman who has the misfortune to have contracted genital
herpes.

She is on a daily regimen of Valtrex to prevent symptoms from
manifesting themselves.

Recently she took her prescription to a pharmacist who was apparently a
fundamentalist Christian.

Not only did he refuse to fill the prescription, but he tore it up and
handed it back to her, saying, God is punishing you for your sin.




Some *ahem* creative suggestions as to what the patient could have 
done in retaliation, to be sure, but I didn't see the political 
affiliation (if indeed any) of the pharmacist was indicated anywhere.



--Ronn!  :)

Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country 
and two words have been added to the pledge of Allegiance... UNDER 
GOD.  Wouldn't it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer and that 
would be eliminated from schools too?

   -- Red Skelton




___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l