Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS 3750

[Vik Malhi]

I would 100% recommend running auto qos on an UNUSED port for the base config 
it adds in global config (e.g. cos-dscp maps) - but MANUALLY add port specific 
commands if required (e.g srr, pr out, service-policy).

Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 
Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
Fax: +1.810.454.0130 
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com




On Mar 10, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Emanuel Damasceno wrote:

> I found this to be very interesting...
> 
> I remember some people asking about the "priority-queue out" command in 
> earlier posts. As I am fine tuning my QoS skills, I found this here on the 
> Command Reference Guide for Catalyst 3750:
> Usage Guidelines When you configure the priority-queue out command, the 
> shaped round robin (SRR) weight ratios are
> affected because there is one fewer queue participating in SRR. This means 
> that weight1 in the srr-queue
> bandwidth shape or the srr-queue bandwidth shape interface configuration 
> command is ignored (not
> used in the ratio calculation). The expedite queue is a priority queue, and 
> it is serviced until empty before
> the other queues are serviced.
> Follow these guidelines when the expedite queue is enabled or the egress 
> queues are serviced based on
> their SRR weights:
> • If the egress expedite queue is enabled, it overrides the SRR shaped and 
> shared weights for queue 1.
> • If the egress expedite queue is disabled and the SRR shaped and shared 
> weights are configured, the
> shaped mode overrides the shared mode for queue 1, and SRR services this 
> queue in shaped mode.
> • If the egress expedite queue is disabled and the SRR shaped weights are not 
> configured, SRR
> services the queue in shared mode.
> So, watch out for auto qos, because it adds priority-queue out on the port 
> you applied auto qos...
> Emanuel Damasceno
> CCNP Voice
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Emanuel Damasceno  
> wrote:
> Hello Expert,
> 
> I am curious... When we issue "auto qos" command on a port, does it "mess" 
> around with queue-set 1 or queue-set 2? 
> 
> I was told by a friend that when we do auto qos it messes around with 
> queue-set 1, but I also see equal configs on queue-set 2. Can anybody share 
> some thoughts?
> 
> Thanks
> Emanuel Damasceno
> CCNP Voice
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call dropped after change SIP trunk MTP Preferred Originating Codec

[Vik Malhi]

You must ensure that the MRGL of the SIP Trunk now points to an IOS Enhanced 
MTP which contains "codec g729r8" as the codec (within the IOS). When using the 
g711u codec you can use the UCM built-in MTP  or the IOS Enhanced MTP (which 
would have "codec g711u" as the chosen codec).

Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 
Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
Fax: +1.810.454.0130 
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com




On Mar 12, 2012, at 2:14 AM, Guoming Zhang wrote:

> I am doing Vol 1 lab 5c,  5.2. Everything works fine and I call make call 
> from HQ or BR1 to BR2 via SIP trunk. However, if I just changed the MTP 
> preferred Originating Codec from g711ulaw to G729 or G729b, call will 
> immediately drop if I call from BR1 to BR2 SCCP phone, but it does not matter 
> if I call from BR1 to BR2 SIP phones. However if I make call from BR2 SCCP to 
> BR1, it works fine. I have enabled debug ccsip all, below is the output. Can 
> anyone tell me what is wrong here?
> 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called-# representation on Calling-phone

[Vik Malhi]

You have to remember that the digit manipulation is bound to the ROUTE LIST and 
not Route Group. So the SLRG benefits can still be seen since- you would just 
need to create a few more Route Lists (which isn't a large overhead) each 
containing SLRG.


Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 
Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
Fax: +1.810.454.0130 
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com




On Mar 12, 2012, at 4:56 AM, Steven wrote:

> Hi List,
> i was wondering if we need to manipulate the Called # on the phne display in 
> the way a user doesn't notice anything.
> 
> For example:
> I have RP 9.1XXX with a RL assigned that includes only the SLRG.
> PreDot is applied to this RP.
> 
> When a user dials 91000 the Pattern matches and the user-display changes to 
> 1000
> Is this the correct way or should it display 91000 instead of 1000
> 
> If the 9 is needed to be displayed i would make my SLRG with PreDot by 
> default.
> 
> I'm struggling with this because i think i would waste a lot of the benefits 
> a SLRG brings.
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> Steven
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ call SC and transfer to CUE

[Vik Malhi]

Make sure you are not using ANY voice-class codec on the dial-peer from GK and 
the dial-peer to CUE. Also make sure you allow H323 to SIP connections. If this 
does not help send me the entire config.

Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 
Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
Fax: +1.810.454.0130 
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com




On Mar 12, 2012, at 7:45 AM, mercy forall wrote:

> 
> 
> Hi all 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> tried to call cue form HQ , i can not give me dissconect , the call use 
> codeck g729 , i install transcoder 3 session in site c
> 
> 
> voice mail work in sc and from pstn , but if the call come through GK 
> disconnect , give me disconnect code 47
> 
> 
> 
> i review all configuration , and also my frind review it , no issue in 
> configuratin , i dont know why ? is this hardware issue , or miss conf
> 
> 
> debug ccsip mess
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 2-R3#
> Mar 12 07:18:41.612: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
> 
> 
> 
> Sent:
> INVITE sip:4220@177.3.11.2:5060 SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
> Remote-Party-ID: "HQPH2" 
> ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
> From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
> To: 
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:18:41 GMT
> Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
> Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat
> Min-SE: 1800
> Cisco-Guid: 2160937878-1352913397-469769730-16575
> User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
> Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, 
> NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER
> CSeq: 101 INVITE
> Max-Forwards: 70
> Timestamp: 1331536721
> Contact:  BR2-R3#p:2002@177.3.11.1:5060>
> Expires: 180
> Allow-Events: telephone-event
> Content-Length: 0
> 
> 
> Mar 12 07:18:41.628: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
> Received:
> SIP/2.0 100 Trying
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
> To: ;tag=cue7b03fb81
> From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
> Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
> CSeq: 101 INVITE
> Content-Length: 0
> Timestamp: 1331536721
> Contact: 
> 
> 
> Mar 12 07:18:41.628: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
> Received:
> SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
> To: ;tag=cue7b03fb81
> From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
> Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
> CSeq: 101 INVITE
> Content-Length: 0
> Contact: 
> 
> 
> Mar 12 07:18:41.632: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
> Received:
> SIP/2.0 200 Ok
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
> To: ;tag=cue7b03fb81
> From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
> Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
> CSeq: 101 INVITE
> Content-Length: 174
> Contact: 
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Call-Info: 
> ;method="NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=2000"
> Allow-Events: telephone-event
> 
> v=0
> o=CiscoSystemsSIP-Workflow-App-UserAgent 1350 1350 IN IP4 177.3.11.2
> s=SIP Call
> c=IN IP4 177.3.11.2
> BR2-R3#
> t=0 0
> m=audio 16904 RTP/AVP 0
> a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000
> a=ptime:20
> 
> Mar 12 07:18:41.636: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
> Sent:
> INVITE sip:4220@177.3.11.2:5060 SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
> Remote-Party-ID: "HQPH2" 
> ;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
> From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
> To: 
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:18:41 GMT
> Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
> Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat
> Min-SE: 1800
> Cisco-Guid: 2160937878-1352913397-469769730-16575
> User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
> Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, 
> NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER
> CSeq: 101 INVITE
> Max-Forwards: 70
> Timestamp: 1331536721
> Contact: 
> Expires: 180
> Allow-Events: telephone-event
> Content-Length: 0
> 
> 
> Mar 12 07:18:41.644: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
> Received:
> SIP/2.0 200 Ok
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
> To: ;tag=cue7b03fb81
> From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
> Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
> CSeq: 101 INVITE
> Content-Length: 174
> Contact: 
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Call-Info: 
> ;method="NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=2000"
> Allow-Events: telephone-event
> 
> v=0
> o=CiscoSystemsSIP-Workflow-App-UserAgent 1350 1350 IN IP4 177.3.11.2
> s=SIP Call
> c=IN IP4 177.3.11.2
> t=0 0
> m=audio 16904 RTP/AVP 0
> a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000
> a=ptime:20
> 
> Mar 12 07:18:41.980: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
> Received:
> SIP/2.0 200 Ok
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
> To: ;tag=cue7b03fb81
> From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
> Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
> CSeq: 101 INVITE
> Content-Length: 174
> Contact: 
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Cal
> BR2-R3#l-Info: 
> ;method="NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=2000"
> Allow-Events: telephone-event
> 
> v=0
> o=CiscoSystemsSIP-Workflow-App-UserAgent 1350 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UnifiedFx PhoneView does not work with cme

[The Masterplan]

Hi Vik,

I was connected to proctor labs. I don't have now a session available, but
accordingly to their site the ios on the router should have been 12.4.22T.

Thank you for your support.

On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Vik Malhi  wrote:

> Can you confirm the version of IOS on the BR2.
>
> Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
> Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc.
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 12, 2012, at 6:03 AM, The Masterplan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested if anyone had the following issue. I was solving workbook 2
> lab 1 and I was trying to manage branch2 phones registered in cme at branch
> 2 site with PhoneView.
> I pasted the lines mentioned in the pdf into the router config, but
> nothingafter I tested that the group has connectivity with cme and
> click add no phone appears in the interface. UCM works perfectly. I have
> Windows 7 x64 and .NET framework ver. 4.
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab ----------------->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7

[Donny Mexico]

Yes Kus,
I also got lab 7 in Dubai 2 days go it was frustrating movement but cant help 
myself

So re-attempting if anyone is interested to work together is welcome he can PM 
me!!

Have u made a call for H323 Trunk TS. Not a valid did solution i am sure 
for that if u are interested u can PM to me

Also lot of new stuff so that we can work

BACD changed
IPCC changed
H323 TS + MGCP TS
CUCM Features new
UNity/cue need auto attendant 

Donny




 From: Kus Bhu 
To: Errol Abrahams  
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"  
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:50 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab -> 7
 

I have seen the lab its really hard


I can only say best of luck which is also of no use 
now!!!





 From: Errol Abrahams 
To: Kus Bhu  
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"  
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:26 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab -> 7
 



Hi Kus,

If I may say somethingDONT GIVE UP!...Are 
you studying on your own?


Regards

Errol





On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Kus Bhu  wrote:

Hi Guys,
>
>
>After working so hard on lab 4 - 5 - 6 , I got lab 7 in test hell amount of 
>stuff is changed in the lab
>
>
>They have added H323 Trunk , Changed the unity questions, DID new questions 
>added, CUCME feature changed they need services in place..
>
>
>I am fedup now just attempting attempting attempting it was my 6th 
>attempt and now i am lost
>
>
>! 
>
>
>
>But i loved the support here which i got from everyone, but now i cannot keep 
>continuing further... I am leaving ccie otherwise i have to leave my fam. 
>:)
>
>
>Thks
>
>
>
>___
>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab ----------------->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7

[Kus Bhu]

I have seen the lab its really hard


I can only say best of luck which is also of no use 
now!!!





 From: Errol Abrahams 
To: Kus Bhu  
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"  
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:26 AM
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab -> 7
 



Hi Kus,

If I may say somethingDONT GIVE UP!...Are 
you studying on your own?


Regards

Errol





On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Kus Bhu  wrote:

Hi Guys,
>
>
>After working so hard on lab 4 - 5 - 6 , I got lab 7 in test hell amount of 
>stuff is changed in the lab
>
>
>They have added H323 Trunk , Changed the unity questions, DID new questions 
>added, CUCME feature changed they need services in place..
>
>
>I am fedup now just attempting attempting attempting it was my 6th 
>attempt and now i am lost
>
>
>! 
>
>
>
>But i loved the support here which i got from everyone, but now i cannot keep 
>continuing further... I am leaving ccie otherwise i have to leave my fam. 
>:)
>
>
>Thks
>
>
>
>___
>For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab ----------------->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7

[Errol Abrahams]

Hi Kus,

If I may say somethingDONT GIVE
UP!...Are you studying on your own?


Regards

Errol





On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Kus Bhu  wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> After working so hard on lab 4 - 5 - 6 , I got lab 7 in test hell amount
> of stuff is changed in the lab
>
> They have added H323 Trunk , Changed the unity questions, DID new
> questions added, CUCME feature changed they need services in place..
>
> I am fedup now just attempting attempting attempting it was my 6th
> attempt and now i am lost
>
> !
>
> But i loved the support here which i got from everyone, but now i cannot
> keep continuing further... I am leaving ccie otherwise i have to leave my
> fam. :)
>
> Thks
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] lab ----------------->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7

[Kus Bhu]

Hi Guys,

After working so hard on lab 4 - 5 - 6 , I got lab 7 in test hell amount of 
stuff is changed in the lab

They have added H323 Trunk , Changed the unity questions, DID new questions 
added, CUCME feature changed they need services in place..

I am fedup now just attempting attempting attempting it was my 6th 
attempt and now i am lost

! 


But i loved the support here which i got from everyone, but now i cannot keep 
continuing further... I am leaving ccie otherwise i have to leave my fam. :)

Thks___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Scoring 100% in High Availability

[Amit Singh]

As long as you don't violate any conditions defined anywhere in the exam. 

Doing extra will not make u looks any points. But I personally prefer not to do 
extra. Sometimes unnecessary troubleshooting can take your time. 

Regards
Amit

Sent from my iPad

On 13/03/2012, at 1:37 AM, "Farkas Péter"  wrote:

> Could we assume that we may loose points by doing some extra?
> 
> Peter
> 
> - Original Message -
> From: AJ BG 
> Date: Monday, March 12, 2012 1:14 am
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Scoring 100% in High Availability
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> 
> 
>> I have concerns about High Availability section in the lab.
>> 
>> 1.   Has anyone scored 100% in High Availability?
>> 
>> 2.   Is there anything beside SRST and BACD that is graded in this
>> section?
>> 
>> I have not been able to score 100% in HA yet. My configurations consist of
>> the standard SRST settings as well as the following settings.
>> 
>> · Call routing requirements,
>> 
>> · Voicemail requirements,
>> 
>> · Date and time requirement,
>> 
>> · Music on hold,
>> 
>> · And additional specific requirements which are specifically
>> requested.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> At the end of my lab I test the requirements to make sure things are
>> working as expected. and ephone-dns are not in invalid state. And Yet so
>> far I have got very low scores in HA.
>> 
>> I was once told that we should not assume requirements in CCIE LAB exams.  
>> But
>> I suppose I am either doing something extra, or I am missing some
>> 
>> sort of requirments that are not specifcally mentioned . I don’t know what
>> am I missing?
>> 
>>  Those who are strong in HA, please advice what else  should I watch for?
>> you are also welcome to send  me a sample configuration.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> AJ 
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>> 
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UnifiedFx PhoneView does not work with cme

[Vik Malhi]

Can you confirm the version of IOS on the BR2.

Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 
Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc.

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
Fax: +1.810.454.0130 
Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com




On Mar 12, 2012, at 6:03 AM, The Masterplan wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I'm interested if anyone had the following issue. I was solving workbook 2 
> lab 1 and I was trying to manage branch2 phones registered in cme at branch 2 
> site with PhoneView.
> I pasted the lines mentioned in the pdf into the router config, but 
> nothingafter I tested that the group has connectivity with cme and click 
> add no phone appears in the interface. UCM works perfectly. I have Windows 7 
> x64 and .NET framework ver. 4.
> 
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
> 
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] [Hyderabad India Dialplan]

[Michael.Sears]

I've had a new site come up in Hyderabad India.  Wondering if someone could 
share information regarding the dial-plan used there.  Any information would be 
appreciated.

Thank you,  --ms

Michael Sears

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] HQ call SC and transfer to CUE

[mercy forall]

Hi all 






tried to call cue form HQ , i can not give me dissconect , the call use codeck 
g729 , i install transcoder 3 session in site c


voice mail work in sc and from pstn , but  if the call come through GK 
disconnect , give me disconnect code 47

 

i review all configuration ,  and also my frind review it , no issue in 
configuratin , i dont know why ? is this hardware issue , or miss conf


 debug ccsip mess







2-R3#
Mar 12 07:18:41.612: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:



Sent:
INVITE sip:4220@177.3.11.2:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
Remote-Party-ID: "HQPH2" 
;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
To: 
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:18:41 GMT
Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat
Min-SE: 1800
Cisco-Guid: 2160937878-1352913397-469769730-16575
User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, 
NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER
CSeq: 101 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 70
Timestamp: 1331536721
Contact: 
Expires: 180
Allow-Events: telephone-event
Content-Length: 0


Mar 12 07:18:41.628: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Received:
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
To: ;tag=cue7b03fb81
From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
CSeq: 101 INVITE
Content-Length: 0
Timestamp: 1331536721
Contact: 


Mar 12 07:18:41.628: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Received:
SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
To: ;tag=cue7b03fb81
From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
CSeq: 101 INVITE
Content-Length: 0
Contact: 


Mar 12 07:18:41.632: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Received:
SIP/2.0 200 Ok
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
To: ;tag=cue7b03fb81
From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
CSeq: 101 INVITE
Content-Length: 174
Contact: 
Content-Type: application/sdp
Call-Info: 
;method="NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=2000"
Allow-Events: telephone-event

v=0
o=CiscoSystemsSIP-Workflow-App-UserAgent 1350 1350 IN IP4 177.3.11.2
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 177.3.11.2
BR2-R3#
t=0 0
m=audio 16904 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000
a=ptime:20

Mar 12 07:18:41.636: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Sent:
INVITE sip:4220@177.3.11.2:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
Remote-Party-ID: "HQPH2" 
;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off
From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
To: 
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:18:41 GMT
Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat
Min-SE: 1800
Cisco-Guid: 2160937878-1352913397-469769730-16575
User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x
Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, 
NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER
CSeq: 101 INVITE
Max-Forwards: 70
Timestamp: 1331536721
Contact: 
Expires: 180
Allow-Events: telephone-event
Content-Length: 0


Mar 12 07:18:41.644: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Received:
SIP/2.0 200 Ok
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
To: ;tag=cue7b03fb81
From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
CSeq: 101 INVITE
Content-Length: 174
Contact: 
Content-Type: application/sdp
Call-Info: 
;method="NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=2000"
Allow-Events: telephone-event

v=0
o=CiscoSystemsSIP-Workflow-App-UserAgent 1350 1350 IN IP4 177.3.11.2
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 177.3.11.2
t=0 0
m=audio 16904 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000
a=ptime:20

Mar 12 07:18:41.980: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Received:
SIP/2.0 200 Ok
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
To: ;tag=cue7b03fb81
From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
CSeq: 101 INVITE
Content-Length: 174
Contact: 
Content-Type: application/sdp
Cal
BR2-R3#l-Info: 
;method="NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=2000"
Allow-Events: telephone-event

v=0
o=CiscoSystemsSIP-Workflow-App-UserAgent 1350 1350 IN IP4 177.3.11.2
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 177.3.11.2
t=0 0
m=audio 16904 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000
a=ptime:20

Mar 12 07:18:42.984: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Received:
SIP/2.0 200 Ok
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 177.3.11.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6974
To: ;tag=cue7b03fb81
From: "HQPH2" ;tag=5DD76C-1051
Call-ID: 6DB359A6-6B4A11E1-804CE032-8E5D7E0@177.3.11.1
CSeq: 101 INVITE
Content-Length: 174
Contact: 
Content-Type: application/sdp
Call-Info: 
;method="NOTIFY;Event=telephone-event;Duration=2000"
Allow-Events: telephone-event

v=0
o=CiscoSystemsSIP-Workflow-App-UserAgent 1350 1350 IN IP4 177.3.11.2
s=SIP Call
c=IN IP4 177.3.11.2
t=0 0
m=audio 16904 RTP/AVP 0
a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000
a=ptime:20

Mar 12 07:18:44.864: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:
Received:
S

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] VPIM

[Anthony Alba]

Hello Juan,

Try 8.0.2 for VPIM; it's included in the demo license.
Of course, you should still use 7.0 for all other tasks.


On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Juan Lopez  wrote:

> how do people train this part with their own HW if VPIM is not in the CUC
> demo license? Is there a workaround?
> cheers,
> Juan
>
> 2012/3/9 Cisco Nut 
>
>> Hi Vik
>> Its my CUC, I am able to add location in my CUE, when I send message to
>>  2125002 from 3002, I hear its telling me
>> sending message to 5002 location 212 but message never gets deliverd,
>> instead I get a message in 3002 that message is not delivered to 5002.
>> I guess its due to the fact CUC dont have VPIM license and it wont accept
>> or send VPIM messages.
>> Regards
>> Rafay
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Vik Malhi  wrote:
>>
>>> Is this your CUC or CUE?
>>>
>>> The demo license on CUC does not allow you to add VPIM locations.
>>>
>>>  Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890
>>> Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc.
>>>
>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420
>>> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>>> Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   On Mar 8, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Cisco Nut wrote:
>>>
>>>   Hi
>>> I am running a Demo license on my CUE server, when I add VPIM location
>>> it gives me an error that VPIM is a license feature, Please let me kow how
>>> you guys are working on VPIM in your home labs.
>>> Please see below exact error I get when I tried adding VPIM location.
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> Status  [image: error] The requested operation would result in a
>>> license violation. [image: error] Unable to create VPIM Location
>>> ___
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
>> visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
>> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
>>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Scoring 100% in High Availability

[Emanuel Damasceno]

Hello Experts,

I was thinking about this and analyzing... We all know how to configure
SRST and AAR, but do we ever check for what's already integrated? Some of
us who have been there at the Lab exam know that some things are already
integrated. So, for instance, do we check if CTI Ports have the proper
config for AAR? Everything that is already integrated I think we take it
for granted. That's one of many things that could catch us in the Lab...

We all need to remember that CCIE Lab is about knowledge and also a chess
game. We need to be paying attention to every detail. I don't know if you
guys do this, but when I am solving Workbooks like IPExpert's and/or INE's,
I am always analytical about it. And I do what's supposed to do, but I also
keep trying things to see what the results are if I do "this" or do "that",
and take my own notes.

I guess we all know that some things depend on other things and that's what
probably makes us lose points if we forget something crucial. I guess
that's it... :)

11 days until my exam...
*Emanuel Damasceno*
CCNP Voice





2012/3/12 "Farkas Péter" 

> Could we assume that we may loose points by doing some extra?
>
> Peter
>
> - Original Message -
> From: AJ BG 
> Date: Monday, March 12, 2012 1:14 am
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Scoring 100% in High Availability
> To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>
>
> > I have concerns about High Availability section in the lab.
> >
> >  1.   Has anyone scored 100% in High Availability?
> >
> >  2.   Is there anything beside SRST and BACD that is graded in this
> >  section?
> >
> >  I have not been able to score 100% in HA yet. My configurations consist
> of
> >  the standard SRST settings as well as the following settings.
> >
> >  · Call routing requirements,
> >
> >  · Voicemail requirements,
> >
> >  · Date and time requirement,
> >
> >  · Music on hold,
> >
> >  · And additional specific requirements which are specifically
> >  requested.
> >
> >
> >
> >  At the end of my lab I test the requirements to make sure things are
> >  working as expected. and ephone-dns are not in invalid state. And Yet so
> >  far I have got very low scores in HA.
> >
> >  I was once told that we should not assume requirements in CCIE LAB
> exams.  But
> >  I suppose I am either doing something extra, or I am missing some
> >
> >  sort of requirments that are not specifcally mentioned . I don’t know
> what
> >  am I missing?
> >
> >   Those who are strong in HA, please advice what else  should I watch
> for?
> >  you are also welcome to send  me a sample configuration.
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >
> >  AJ
> > ___
> >  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UnifiedFx PhoneView does not work with cme

[The Masterplan]

Hi,

I'm interested if anyone had the following issue. I was solving workbook 2
lab 1 and I was trying to manage branch2 phones registered in cme at branch
2 site with PhoneView.
I pasted the lines mentioned in the pdf into the router config, but
nothingafter I tested that the group has connectivity with cme and
click add no phone appears in the interface. UCM works perfectly. I have
Windows 7 x64 and .NET framework ver. 4.
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Scoring 100% in High Availability

[Farkas Péter]

Could we assume that we may loose points by doing some extra?

Peter

- Original Message -
From: AJ BG 
Date: Monday, March 12, 2012 1:14 am
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Scoring 100% in High Availability
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com


> I have concerns about High Availability section in the lab.
>  
>  1.   Has anyone scored 100% in High Availability?
>  
>  2.   Is there anything beside SRST and BACD that is graded in this
>  section?
>  
>  I have not been able to score 100% in HA yet. My configurations consist of
>  the standard SRST settings as well as the following settings.
>  
>  · Call routing requirements,
>  
>  · Voicemail requirements,
>  
>  · Date and time requirement,
>  
>  · Music on hold,
>  
>  · And additional specific requirements which are specifically
>  requested.
>  
>  
>  
>  At the end of my lab I test the requirements to make sure things are
>  working as expected. and ephone-dns are not in invalid state. And Yet so
>  far I have got very low scores in HA.
>  
>  I was once told that we should not assume requirements in CCIE LAB exams.  
> But
>  I suppose I am either doing something extra, or I am missing some
>  
>  sort of requirments that are not specifcally mentioned . I don’t know what
>  am I missing?
>  
>   Those who are strong in HA, please advice what else  should I watch for?
>  you are also welcome to send  me a sample configuration.
>  
>  Thanks,
>  
>  AJ 
> ___
>  For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>  
>  Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
> www.PlatinumPlacement.com 
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeeper Rejection Troubleshooting

[Steve Sarrick]

I understand the debugging for gatekeeper in the scenario provided such that
the backbone gatekeeper cannot receive a call and we need to determine and
document the reasons the call will not go through.  What I cannot seem to
find in the Online support available during the lab is the Cause Codes ­
could someone please provide me with a location for these codes that will be
available in the lab?  These would be the hex codes generated in the debug
h225 ans1 command.  Thanks for the help.

Steve



___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Called-# representation on Calling-phone

[Steven]

Hi List,
i was wondering if we need to manipulate the Called # on the phne 
display in the way a user doesn't notice anything.


For example:
I have RP 9.1XXX with a RL assigned that includes only the SLRG.
PreDot is applied to this RP.

When a user dials 91000 the Pattern matches and the user-display changes 
to 1000

Is this the correct way or should it display 91000 instead of 1000

If the 9 is needed to be displayed i would make my SLRG with PreDot by 
default.


I'm struggling with this because i think i would waste a lot of the 
benefits a SLRG brings.


Thanks and Regards,
Steven
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com