Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR and uccx
Ram, If i remember correctly, the catch is that the AAR mask on the CTI port has to point to the RP. so your aar mask on CTI port needs to be 4000 not 400x On Jul 10, 2013 5:39 PM, Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Piyush, I assigned HQ device pool and location setting on CTI route point and CTI ports to HQ. Following is isdn debug output when calling from 4002 to 4000 ( during AAR) HQ(config)# Jul 10 22:15:08.149: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x000F Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98397 Exclusive, Channel 23 Calling Party Number i = 0x1181, '85224044011' Plan:ISDN, Type:International Called Party Number i = 0x91, '85224044102' Plan:ISDN, Type:International Jul 10 22:15:08.201: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x800F Channel ID i = 0xA98397 Exclusive, Channel 23 HQ(config)# Jul 10 22:15:08.329: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x800F Progress Ind i = 0x8088 - In-band info or appropriate now available Jul 10 22:15:08.341: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x000F Cause i = 0x8290 - Normal call clearing Site C phone 2 Line 2 4102 ring and call disconnect in 2 sec. with below error message Jul 10 22:16:48.524: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0048 Sending Complete Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA9838B Exclusive, Channel 11 Display i = 'SiteC Phone 2' Calling Party Number i = 0x1183, '+85224044002' Plan:ISDN, Type:International Called Party Number i = 0x91, '85224044010' Plan:ISDN, Type:International Jul 10 22:16:48.524: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x80D5 Jul 10 22:16:48.780: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX - STATUS pd = 8 callref = 0x00D5 Cause i = 0x80E202 - Message not compatible with call state or not implemented Call State i = 0x0C Jul 10 22:16:48.780: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x8047 Jul 10 22:16:48.780: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x00D5 Basically when calling from HQ PH1 to 4000 ( in AAR) it work without any issue. Thanks, Ramcharan Arya On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:37 PM, jainpiyush2...@ymail.com wrote: Hello Ram, You can assign Hq device pool and location setting to cti route point and cti ports.. And assign site c device pool and location to site c phones... Regards, Piyush Jain Sent from my android device. -Original Message- From: Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 7:59 AM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR and uccx Hi, I have a CTI Route point 4000 and two CTI port 410x and 410y SiteC Phone 1 and SC Phone 2 are in CSQ which is assign to application and associated with trigger. Due to RSVP when call exceed ip rsvp bandwidth call from uccx to site Phones should use AAR and to over PSTN. My doubts are . What should be local and device pool of CTI ports so it should work in AAR when PSTN caller make call to CTI route point number 4000. Can someone please advice about this. Thanks, Ramcharan Arya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR and uccx
Hi Piyush, I assigned HQ device pool and location setting on CTI route point and CTI ports to HQ. Following is isdn debug output when calling from 4002 to 4000 ( during AAR) HQ(config)# Jul 10 22:15:08.149: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x000F Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98397 Exclusive, Channel 23 Calling Party Number i = 0x1181, '85224044011' Plan:ISDN, Type:International Called Party Number i = 0x91, '85224044102' Plan:ISDN, Type:International Jul 10 22:15:08.201: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x800F Channel ID i = 0xA98397 Exclusive, Channel 23 HQ(config)# Jul 10 22:15:08.329: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: RX - ALERTING pd = 8 callref = 0x800F Progress Ind i = 0x8088 - In-band info or appropriate now available Jul 10 22:15:08.341: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: TX - DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x000F Cause i = 0x8290 - Normal call clearing Site C phone 2 Line 2 4102 ring and call disconnect in 2 sec. with below error message Jul 10 22:16:48.524: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX - SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0048 Sending Complete Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA9838B Exclusive, Channel 11 Display i = 'SiteC Phone 2' Calling Party Number i = 0x1183, '+85224044002' Plan:ISDN, Type:International Called Party Number i = 0x91, '85224044010' Plan:ISDN, Type:International Jul 10 22:16:48.524: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: TX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x80D5 Jul 10 22:16:48.780: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX - STATUS pd = 8 callref = 0x00D5 Cause i = 0x80E202 - Message not compatible with call state or not implemented Call State i = 0x0C Jul 10 22:16:48.780: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX - RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x8047 Jul 10 22:16:48.780: ISDN Se0/0/0:15 Q931: RX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x00D5 Basically when calling from HQ PH1 to 4000 ( in AAR) it work without any issue. Thanks, Ramcharan Arya On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:37 PM, jainpiyush2...@ymail.com wrote: Hello Ram, You can assign Hq device pool and location setting to cti route point and cti ports.. And assign site c device pool and location to site c phones... Regards, Piyush Jain Sent from my android device. -Original Message- From: Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 7:59 AM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR and uccx Hi, I have a CTI Route point 4000 and two CTI port 410x and 410y SiteC Phone 1 and SC Phone 2 are in CSQ which is assign to application and associated with trigger. Due to RSVP when call exceed ip rsvp bandwidth call from uccx to site Phones should use AAR and to over PSTN. My doubts are . What should be local and device pool of CTI ports so it should work in AAR when PSTN caller make call to CTI route point number 4000. Can someone please advice about this. Thanks, Ramcharan Arya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR and uccx
Hello Ram, You can assign Hq device pool and location setting to cti route point and cti ports.. And assign site c device pool and location to site c phones... Regards, Piyush Jain Sent from my android device. -Original Message- From: Ramcharan Arya ramcharan.a...@gmail.com To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 7:59 AM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR and uccx Hi, I have a CTI Route point 4000 and two CTI port 410x and 410y SiteC Phone 1 and SC Phone 2 are in CSQ which is assign to application and associated with trigger. Due to RSVP when call exceed ip rsvp bandwidth call from uccx to site Phones should use AAR and to over PSTN. My doubts are . What should be local and device pool of CTI ports so it should work in AAR when PSTN caller make call to CTI route point number 4000. Can someone please advice about this. Thanks, Ramcharan Arya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR and uccx
Hi, I have a CTI Route point 4000 and two CTI port 410x and 410y SiteC Phone 1 and SC Phone 2 are in CSQ which is assign to application and associated with trigger. Due to RSVP when call exceed ip rsvp bandwidth call from uccx to site Phones should use AAR and to over PSTN. My doubts are . What should be local and device pool of CTI ports so it should work in AAR when PSTN caller make call to CTI route point number 4000. Can someone please advice about this. Thanks, Ramcharan Arya ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR for UCCX
I have not testeed AAR with EM, but for CTI RP I have made it and it works. Maybe I made the wrong test with CTI RP, but the fact is that I could call the UCCX IVR from Branch 1 IP phones when there was no enough bandwidth on the WAN link, and the call to UCCX was routed through PSTN. On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Mohammed Al Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, ** ** I haven’t tested this. But my info is based on CUCM SRND. They haven’t given any exception on AAR and CTI inter-operability. Can you please highlight further. ** ** “AAR does not support CTI route points as the origin or the destination of calls. Also, AAR is incompatible with the Extension Mobility feature when users roam across different sites.” ** ** Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari ** ** *From:* datucha123 datucha123 [mailto:datucha...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Sunday, January 15, 2012 1:03 AM *To:* Mohd Baqari *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR for UCCX ** ** AAR is supported with CTI, when it is registered. For instance the CTI Route Point supports AAR, when it is registered. But as soon as it will unregister (or some Dummy CTI Route Point, which never gets registered) does not support AAR. On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Datucha, In your scenario whats confusing me is how aar is triggered. As far as I know AAR isn't supported with CTI Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Jan 8, 2012, at 9:11 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have been making a test and find out the following issue: So, I set the AAR Mask to CTI Route Points Line Settings, and the calls from Branch1 to UCCX when there was no WAN bandwidth available were routed through PSTN successfully. I have not set any AAR Group and AAR CSS for CTI ports, but the HQ gateway has them. So when I called the UCCX IVR (simpla AA script) through HQ Gateway and dialed the Branch 1 Phones extensions, the call has been routed through PSTN based on CAC restrictions. Well that's ok with CAC. But I cannot understand how the AAR got worked, when neither CTI ports nor the CTI Route Point had any AAR configuration (AAR Mask has been also removed from the CTI RP Line). HQ Gateway had the AAR Group and CSS set. So based on that, UCCX took the HQ gateway setttings of AAR and made a call? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ** ** ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR for UCCX
Hi Datucha, In your scenario whats confusing me is how aar is triggered. As far as I know AAR isn't supported with CTI Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Jan 8, 2012, at 9:11 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have been making a test and find out the following issue: So, I set the AAR Mask to CTI Route Points Line Settings, and the calls from Branch1 to UCCX when there was no WAN bandwidth available were routed through PSTN successfully. I have not set any AAR Group and AAR CSS for CTI ports, but the HQ gateway has them. So when I called the UCCX IVR (simpla AA script) through HQ Gateway and dialed the Branch 1 Phones extensions, the call has been routed through PSTN based on CAC restrictions. Well that's ok with CAC. But I cannot understand how the AAR got worked, when neither CTI ports nor the CTI Route Point had any AAR configuration (AAR Mask has been also removed from the CTI RP Line). HQ Gateway had the AAR Group and CSS set. So based on that, UCCX took the HQ gateway setttings of AAR and made a call? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR for UCCX
Hi, I haven't tested this. But my info is based on CUCM SRND. They haven't given any exception on AAR and CTI inter-operability. Can you please highlight further. AAR does not support CTI route points as the origin or the destination of calls. Also, AAR is incompatible with the Extension Mobility feature when users roam across different sites. Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari From: datucha123 datucha123 [mailto:datucha...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 1:03 AM To: Mohd Baqari Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR for UCCX AAR is supported with CTI, when it is registered. For instance the CTI Route Point supports AAR, when it is registered. But as soon as it will unregister (or some Dummy CTI Route Point, which never gets registered) does not support AAR. On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Mohd Baqari baqari.voic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Datucha, In your scenario whats confusing me is how aar is triggered. As far as I know AAR isn't supported with CTI Regards, Mohammed Al Baqari Sent from my iPhone On Jan 8, 2012, at 9:11 PM, datucha123 datucha123 datucha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have been making a test and find out the following issue: So, I set the AAR Mask to CTI Route Points Line Settings, and the calls from Branch1 to UCCX when there was no WAN bandwidth available were routed through PSTN successfully. I have not set any AAR Group and AAR CSS for CTI ports, but the HQ gateway has them. So when I called the UCCX IVR (simpla AA script) through HQ Gateway and dialed the Branch 1 Phones extensions, the call has been routed through PSTN based on CAC restrictions. Well that's ok with CAC. But I cannot understand how the AAR got worked, when neither CTI ports nor the CTI Route Point had any AAR configuration (AAR Mask has been also removed from the CTI RP Line). HQ Gateway had the AAR Group and CSS set. So based on that, UCCX took the HQ gateway setttings of AAR and made a call? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com/ Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com http://www.platinumplacement.com/ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] AAR for UCCX
Hello, I have been making a test and find out the following issue: So, I set the AAR Mask to CTI Route Points Line Settings, and the calls from Branch1 to UCCX when there was no WAN bandwidth available were routed through PSTN successfully. I have not set any AAR Group and AAR CSS for CTI ports, but the HQ gateway has them. So when I called the UCCX IVR (simpla AA script) through HQ Gateway and dialed the Branch 1 Phones extensions, the call has been routed through PSTN based on CAC restrictions. Well that's ok with CAC. But I cannot understand how the AAR got worked, when neither CTI ports nor the CTI Route Point had any AAR configuration (AAR Mask has been also removed from the CTI RP Line). HQ Gateway had the AAR Group and CSS set. So based on that, UCCX took the HQ gateway setttings of AAR and made a call? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
