Re: [ccp4bb] Normal mode refinement

2014-10-21 Thread Appu kumar
Dear All,
Thank you very much for valuable suggestions and educating me on the normal
mode refinement. Actually, I am trying to refine a protein (cytosolic
domain and trans-membrane domain). I found a solution through PHASER and
density looks really good in both domain but as i proceeds with refinement
density remain great in both domain till Rfree around 38%. Interestingly,
with further refinement cycle, Rfree reduced to  30% but the density in the
trans-membrane domain becomes very weak. That is why i am wondering whether
it is possible to improve the density in the trans-membrane domain by using
Normal mode refinement. Conservatively speaking, it could be possible that
trans-membrane is highly flexible or disordered and after much cerebration,
i am thinking to incorporate the normal mode refinement to monitor if there
is any improvement in electron density trans-membrane domain.
I would follow suggestions of Dr, Mande and Dr. Ethan. Also, would give a
try to what Arpita has suggested. I further, warmly welcome any suggestion
on refinement procedure to improve electron density in flexible or
disordered trans-membrane domain.
Appu

On 20 October 2014 23:41, Arpita Goswami bt.arp...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 You can also contact elNemo or NOMAD-Ref server developers about getting
 covariance/correlation matrices from normal mode analysis outputs to know
 the correctly coordinated mobile atoms. In this way you can compare with
 biological data also. In Shekhar's said paper K. Suhre (one of the
 developer of el-Nemo server) has done the same very correctly.

 best wishes,
 Arpita

 On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Appu kumar appu.kum...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear CCP4 Users,
 I seek your valuable advice and suggestion in carrying out the normal
 mode structure refinement which manifest the dynamics of protein as linear
 combination of harmonic modes, used to describe the motion of protein
 structure in collective fashion. Studies suggest that it is highly useful
 in refining the protein structure which harbors a considerable magnitude of
 flexibility in atomic position owing to high thermal factors.
 Therefor I want to know is there any software/script available to execute
 the normal mode of refinement. Thanks a lot in advance for your imperative
 suggestions

 Appu




 --
 Arpita

 --
 Arpita Goswami
 Senior Research Fellow
 Structural Biology Laboratory
 Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD)
 Tuljaguda (Opp MJ Market),
 Nampally, Hyderabad 500 001
 INDIA
 Phone: +91- 40- 24749401/404
 Mobile: 9390923667, 9502389184
 Email: arp...@cdfd.org.in



Re: [ccp4bb] Normal mode refinement

2014-10-21 Thread Appu kumar
Dear All,
Thank you very much for valuable suggestions and educating me on the normal
mode refinement. Actually, I am trying to refine a protein (cytosolic
domain and trans-membrane domain). I found a solution through PHASER and
density looks really good in both domain but as i proceeds with refinement
density remain great in both domain till Rfree around 38%. Interestingly,
with further refinement cycle, Rfree reduced to  30% but the density in the
trans-membrane domain becomes very weak. That is why i am wondering whether
it is possible to improve the density in the trans-membrane domain by using
Normal mode refinement. Conservatively speaking, it could be possible that
trans-membrane is highly flexible or disordered and after much cerebration,
i am thinking to incorporate the normal mode refinement to monitor if there
is any improvement in electron density trans-membrane domain.
I would follow suggestions of Dr, Mande and Dr. Ethan. Also, would give a
try to what Arpita has suggested. I further, warmly welcome any suggestion
on refinement procedure to improve electron density in flexible or
disordered trans-membrane domain.
Appu

On 21 October 2014 07:39, Appu kumar appu.kum...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear All,
 Thank you very much for valuable suggestions and educating me on the
 normal mode refinement. Actually, I am trying to refine a protein
 (cytosolic domain and trans-membrane domain). I found a solution through
 PHASER and density looks really good in both domain but as i proceeds with
 refinement density remain great in both domain till Rfree around 38%.
 Interestingly, with further refinement cycle, Rfree reduced to  30% but the
 density in the trans-membrane domain becomes very weak. That is why i am
 wondering whether it is possible to improve the density in the
 trans-membrane domain by using Normal mode refinement. Conservatively
 speaking, it could be possible that trans-membrane is highly flexible or
 disordered and after much cerebration, i am thinking to incorporate the
 normal mode refinement to monitor if there is any improvement in electron
 density trans-membrane domain.
 I would follow suggestions of Dr, Mande and Dr. Ethan. Also, would give a
 try to what Arpita has suggested. I further, warmly welcome any suggestion
 on refinement procedure to improve electron density in flexible or
 disordered trans-membrane domain.
 Appu

 On 20 October 2014 23:41, Arpita Goswami bt.arp...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 You can also contact elNemo or NOMAD-Ref server developers about getting
 covariance/correlation matrices from normal mode analysis outputs to know
 the correctly coordinated mobile atoms. In this way you can compare with
 biological data also. In Shekhar's said paper K. Suhre (one of the
 developer of el-Nemo server) has done the same very correctly.

 best wishes,
 Arpita

 On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Appu kumar appu.kum...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 Dear CCP4 Users,
 I seek your valuable advice and suggestion in carrying out the normal
 mode structure refinement which manifest the dynamics of protein as linear
 combination of harmonic modes, used to describe the motion of protein
 structure in collective fashion. Studies suggest that it is highly useful
 in refining the protein structure which harbors a considerable magnitude of
 flexibility in atomic position owing to high thermal factors.
 Therefor I want to know is there any software/script available to
 execute the normal mode of refinement. Thanks a lot in advance for your
 imperative suggestions

 Appu




 --
 Arpita

 --
 Arpita Goswami
 Senior Research Fellow
 Structural Biology Laboratory
 Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD)
 Tuljaguda (Opp MJ Market),
 Nampally, Hyderabad 500 001
 INDIA
 Phone: +91- 40- 24749401/404
 Mobile: 9390923667, 9502389184
 Email: arp...@cdfd.org.in





Re: [ccp4bb] Normal mode refinement

2014-10-21 Thread Ethan Merritt
On Tuesday, 21 October 2014 07:39:53 AM Appu kumar wrote:
 Dear All,
 Thank you very much for valuable suggestions and educating me on the normal
 mode refinement. Actually, I am trying to refine a protein (cytosolic
 domain and trans-membrane domain). I found a solution through PHASER and
 density looks really good in both domain but as i proceeds with refinement
 density remain great in both domain till Rfree around 38%. Interestingly,
 with further refinement cycle, Rfree reduced to  30% but the density in the
 trans-membrane domain becomes very weak. That is why i am wondering whether
 it is possible to improve the density in the trans-membrane domain by using
 Normal mode refinement. Conservatively speaking, it could be possible that
 trans-membrane is highly flexible or disordered and after much cerebration,
 i am thinking to incorporate the normal mode refinement to monitor if there
 is any improvement in electron density trans-membrane domain.

Please keep in mind that if the density is poor because the protein really
is disordered, a perfect description of those disordered cell contents will
perfectly reproduce that poor density.   So improved description does not
necessarily imply improved map quality.

This is quite different from the case of a poor model for a well-ordered
structure.  Here also you will see a low quality map, but in this case it
will improve as your description of the cell contents improves.


Ethan



 I would follow suggestions of Dr, Mande and Dr. Ethan.  Also, would give a
 try to what Arpita has suggested.  I further, warmly welcome any suggestion
 on refinement procedure to improve electron density in flexible or
 disordered trans-membrane domain.
 Appu
 
 On 20 October 2014 23:41, Arpita Goswami bt.arp...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Hello,
 
  You can also contact elNemo or NOMAD-Ref server developers about getting
  covariance/correlation matrices from normal mode analysis outputs to know
  the correctly coordinated mobile atoms. In this way you can compare with
  biological data also. In Shekhar's said paper K. Suhre (one of the
  developer of el-Nemo server) has done the same very correctly.
 
  best wishes,
  Arpita
 
  On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Appu kumar appu.kum...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Dear CCP4 Users,
  I seek your valuable advice and suggestion in carrying out the normal
  mode structure refinement which manifest the dynamics of protein as linear
  combination of harmonic modes, used to describe the motion of protein
  structure in collective fashion. Studies suggest that it is highly useful
  in refining the protein structure which harbors a considerable magnitude of
  flexibility in atomic position owing to high thermal factors.
  Therefor I want to know is there any software/script available to execute
  the normal mode of refinement. Thanks a lot in advance for your imperative
  suggestions
 
  Appu
 
 
 
 
  --
  Arpita
 
  --
  Arpita Goswami
  Senior Research Fellow
  Structural Biology Laboratory
  Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD)
  Tuljaguda (Opp MJ Market),
  Nampally, Hyderabad 500 001
  INDIA
  Phone: +91- 40- 24749401/404
  Mobile: 9390923667, 9502389184
  Email: arp...@cdfd.org.in
 

-- 
mail:   Biomolecular Structure Center,  K-428 Health Sciences Bldg
MS 357742,   University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7742


[ccp4bb] Normal mode refinement

2014-10-20 Thread Appu kumar
Dear CCP4 Users,
I seek your valuable advice and suggestion in carrying out the normal mode
structure refinement which manifest the dynamics of protein as linear
combination of harmonic modes, used to describe the motion of protein
structure in collective fashion. Studies suggest that it is highly useful
in refining the protein structure which harbors a considerable magnitude of
flexibility in atomic position owing to high thermal factors.
Therefor I want to know is there any software/script available to execute
the normal mode of refinement. Thanks a lot in advance for your imperative
suggestions

Appu


Re: [ccp4bb] Normal mode refinement

2014-10-20 Thread Ethan A Merritt
On Monday, 20 October, 2014 18:10:03 Appu kumar wrote:
 Dear CCP4 Users,
 I seek your valuable advice and suggestion in carrying out the normal mode
 structure refinement which manifest the dynamics of protein as linear
 combination of harmonic modes, used to describe the motion of protein
 structure in collective fashion. Studies suggest that it is highly useful
 in refining the protein structure which harbors a considerable magnitude of
 flexibility in atomic position owing to high thermal factors.
 Therefor I want to know is there any software/script available to execute
 the normal mode of refinement. Thanks a lot in advance for your imperative
 suggestions

The previously published examples of normal-mode refinement that I know
about used private external programs to generate thermal ellipsoids for each
atom, and then used those as fixed ADPs while refining coordinates in
refmac or similar standard program.  Again speaking only of the examples
I have looked at in detail, the result was better (had lower R factors)
than a conventional isotropic refinement but was not nearly as good as a
multi-group TLS refinement of the same structure (TLSMD + refmac).

On the other hand, there is a quite different way normal modes can be used
in refinement.   As I understand it (perhaps Garib will add addtional details)
the jellybody refinement mode of recent refmac versions can be viewed
as restraining the model shifts to be consistent with the principle normal mode.
In this way the normal mode contributes to the path of the refinement,
but is not explicitly part of the final model.  

So it may be that using TLSMD + refmac jellybody TLS refinement
would get you the best of both approaches, though I have not gone back
to look again at the published example structures since the advent of
jellybody refinement.  But note that jellybody is primarily useful when
you already have a high-qualityl, good geometry, starting model.

Ethan

-- 
Ethan A Merritt
Biomolecular Structure Center,  K-428 Health Sciences Bldg
MS 357742,   University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7742


Re: [ccp4bb] Normal mode refinement

2014-10-20 Thread Shekhar Mande
 I agree with Ethan.

In philosophy, NMA is a useful analysis  to study low frequency collective
motions.  That is true by taking  a stand-alone structure and explore such
motions of biological interest.  Domain motions in the crystallographic
environment need not necessarily correspond to those of the isolated
molecule.  Also, please remember, many a times the most significant modes
(say mode 7 or mode 8) in NMA do not represent the motions of biological
interest.  One is usually recommended to analyze many significant modes to
extract the useful information, and in the extremes of argument, making at
times this as a subjective exercise.

In any case, I would strongly argue for TLSMD, as Ethan has pointed out, as
that represents modeling disorder in crystallographic environment. In one
of the examples where we were studying the relationship between NMA (for a
stand-alone molecule) and TLS, we could correlate the two for the 11th and
the 12th mode, suggesting clearly that 7th- 10th modes did not show a good
correlation.  By incorporating the 7-10th modes in crystallographic
refinement, we would have clearly not made the model better!

Shekhar

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Ethan A Merritt merr...@u.washington.edu
wrote:

 On Monday, 20 October, 2014 18:10:03 Appu kumar wrote:
  Dear CCP4 Users,
  I seek your valuable advice and suggestion in carrying out the normal
 mode
  structure refinement which manifest the dynamics of protein as linear
  combination of harmonic modes, used to describe the motion of protein
  structure in collective fashion. Studies suggest that it is highly useful
  in refining the protein structure which harbors a considerable magnitude
 of
  flexibility in atomic position owing to high thermal factors.
  Therefor I want to know is there any software/script available to execute
  the normal mode of refinement. Thanks a lot in advance for your
 imperative
  suggestions

 The previously published examples of normal-mode refinement that I know
 about used private external programs to generate thermal ellipsoids for
 each
 atom, and then used those as fixed ADPs while refining coordinates in
 refmac or similar standard program.  Again speaking only of the examples
 I have looked at in detail, the result was better (had lower R factors)
 than a conventional isotropic refinement but was not nearly as good as a
 multi-group TLS refinement of the same structure (TLSMD + refmac).

 On the other hand, there is a quite different way normal modes can be used
 in refinement.   As I understand it (perhaps Garib will add addtional
 details)
 the jellybody refinement mode of recent refmac versions can be viewed
 as restraining the model shifts to be consistent with the principle normal
 mode.
 In this way the normal mode contributes to the path of the refinement,
 but is not explicitly part of the final model.

 So it may be that using TLSMD + refmac jellybody TLS refinement
 would get you the best of both approaches, though I have not gone back
 to look again at the published example structures since the advent of
 jellybody refinement.  But note that jellybody is primarily useful when
 you already have a high-qualityl, good geometry, starting model.

 Ethan

 --
 Ethan A Merritt
 Biomolecular Structure Center,  K-428 Health Sciences Bldg
 MS 357742,   University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7742




-- 
Shekhar C. Mande (शेखर चिं मांडे)
Director, National Centre for Cell Science
Ganeshkhind, Pune 411 007
Email: shek...@nccs.res.in, direc...@nccs.res.in
Phone: +91-20-25708121
Fax:+91-20-25692259


Re: [ccp4bb] Normal mode refinement

2014-10-20 Thread Arpita Goswami
Hello,

You can also contact elNemo or NOMAD-Ref server developers about getting
covariance/correlation matrices from normal mode analysis outputs to know
the correctly coordinated mobile atoms. In this way you can compare with
biological data also. In Shekhar's said paper K. Suhre (one of the
developer of el-Nemo server) has done the same very correctly.

best wishes,
Arpita

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Appu kumar appu.kum...@gmail.com wrote:

 Dear CCP4 Users,
 I seek your valuable advice and suggestion in carrying out the normal mode
 structure refinement which manifest the dynamics of protein as linear
 combination of harmonic modes, used to describe the motion of protein
 structure in collective fashion. Studies suggest that it is highly useful
 in refining the protein structure which harbors a considerable magnitude of
 flexibility in atomic position owing to high thermal factors.
 Therefor I want to know is there any software/script available to execute
 the normal mode of refinement. Thanks a lot in advance for your imperative
 suggestions

 Appu




-- 
Arpita

--
Arpita Goswami
Senior Research Fellow
Structural Biology Laboratory
Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics (CDFD)
Tuljaguda (Opp MJ Market),
Nampally, Hyderabad 500 001
INDIA
Phone: +91- 40- 24749401/404
Mobile: 9390923667, 9502389184
Email: arp...@cdfd.org.in