Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Multicast Manager
The best box to monitor video with is an IneoQuest or two... :) On Aug 16, 2010 8:44 PM, John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com wrote: We have very large numbers of high-bandwidth multicast video streams to monitor. The product is not vaporware, it's sitting on my desk! We've had it for a while, but no one has had time to implement it. I'm the new guy, so it was passed to me. I was hoping someone here had experience with it. I just wanted to hear some opinions of it. I haven't had a chance to develop an opinion of it since I haven't seen it running yet. I'm hoping to get it installed this week. On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Tony Varriale tvarri...@comcast.net wrote: - Original Message - From: John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 11:02 AM Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco Multicast Manager Anyone here running CMM? I've been tasked with learning about it and installing it. We've apparently had it for a couple of months, but no one has had time to get it up and running. I'd love to hear if anyone here is running and what your thoughts are about it. It looks like it should be useful for us, but the documentation is a little bare on CCO. I probably won't really know how useful it will be until I get it installed. I've never even seen a working version of it, nor have I seen any screenshots of it. I'm the new guy. lol This is the first time I've heard of it. It may be vaporware LOL! The customers that I have that really use multicast just monitor it via their network management station (via SNMP). Mind if I ask what you are using multicast for and what your interest is in such a product? tv ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BFD on SVI 12.2(55)SE
7600 will get it too ;-) -- Tassos Raymond Lucas wrote on 17/08/2010 01:45: Available now on ME switches... surely only a matter of time before it (re-)appears on other platforms... Unfortunately no documentation to go with it yet though. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/catalyst3750m/software/release/12.2_55_se/release/notes/OL23055.html#wp241488 Ray ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Multicast Manager
On 08/16/2010 05:02 PM, John Neiberger wrote: Anyone here running CMM? I've been tasked with learning about it and installing it. We've apparently had it for a couple of months, but no one has had time to get it up and running. I'd love to hear if anyone here is running and what your thoughts are about it. It looks like it We looked at it while back. It was way to expensive for what it did. Do you use L3VPNs and MVPN? Does CMM handle that? ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] elam trigger for src mac address
David Freedman wrote on 13/08/2010 19:35: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: Does anyone know what is the trigger syntax for elam in order to match on src mac address? The only syntax i found being accepted is the following, but i'm not sure if that is working. show platform capture elam trigger dbus inband if SMAC=001e.f740.df00 Why inband? Is there an IPv4 payload? can you not show plat cap elam trigger dbus ipv4 if SMAC=001e.f740.df00 ? This isn't an IP packet (it probably has to with CFM) and i only know the source mac address. -- Tassos ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] elam trigger for src mac address
David Freedman wrote on 13/08/2010 19:35: Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: Does anyone know what is the trigger syntax for elam in order to match on src mac address? The only syntax i found being accepted is the following, but i'm not sure if that is working. show platform capture elam trigger dbus inband if SMAC=001e.f740.df00 Why inband? Is there an IPv4 payload? can you not show plat cap elam trigger dbus ipv4 if SMAC=001e.f740.df00 ? This isn't an IP packet (it probably has to do with CFM) and i only know the source mac address. -- Tassos ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] OT: Plea for Pakistan Flood Victoms
Friends, As you are already aware of the natural catastrophic disaster occurred in Pakistan in recent month. Disaster on this scale would be devastating for any country, but for Pakistan – a developing nation, chronically unstable due to fight against terrorism - the consequences may go well beyond those posed by the urgent need for humanitarian relief and for reconstruction in the longer term. So far, approximately 2000 people are believed to have died and millions have made homeless. UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs estimates that 13.8 million people have been affected by the floods, making this a greater catastrophe than the Kashmir earthquake of 2005, or the Haiti earthquake of earlier this year, each of which affected 3 million people, or the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, which affected 5 million. People of Pakistan are fighting the battle against nature on its own but this can’t be fought without international help that’s why UN chief Ban Ki-moon has urged the world to urgently speed up aid but the international response was very slow. We fear we're getting close to the start of seeing a second wave of death if not enough money comes through, due to water-borne diseases along with lack of clean water and food shortages The damage and the magnitude is too large for natural resources to cope with it ... Pakistan needs your help. Friends, If anyone requires any more information in this regard or would like to donate can unicast me. Following are some links where you guys can donate: https://secure.savethechildren.org/01/web_e_pakistan_flood_10 https://www.wfp.org/donate/pakistanflood http://www1.networkforgood.org/support-flood-relief-pakistan http://www.prcs.org.pk/default.asp https://www.oxfam.org.uk/donate/pakistan-floods/index.php http://www.globalgiving.org/projects/pakistan-flood/ https://www.concern.net/civicrm/contribute/transact?reset=1id=54 http://usa.humanityfirst.org/index.php?option=com_contentview=articleid=164:pakistan-flood-relief-1st-updatecatid=1Itemid=19 -- Regards, Asif Khan ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Multicast Manager
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:29 AM, Phil Mayers p.may...@imperial.ac.uk wrote: On 08/16/2010 05:02 PM, John Neiberger wrote: Anyone here running CMM? I've been tasked with learning about it and installing it. We've apparently had it for a couple of months, but no one has had time to get it up and running. I'd love to hear if anyone here is running and what your thoughts are about it. It looks like it We looked at it while back. It was way to expensive for what it did. Do you use L3VPNs and MVPN? Does CMM handle that? We do not use L3VPNs or MVPN. We just have a lot of streams to monitor. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] elam trigger for src mac address
On (2010-08-17 11:50 +0300), Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: This isn't an IP packet (it probably has to do with CFM) and i only know the source mac address. AFAIK what you want to do, needs to be done by matching bit by bit. First you specify pattern then you specify mask. So if you want to match for SMAC of c00l.dead.babe it should be: dbus others if data = 0 0 0 0xc00ldead 0xbabe [ 0 0 0 0x 0x ] -- ++ytti ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Network Change Management
All: I know there are tools out there like RANCID that help manage configuration changes but we want something that will be able to be able to have a system that will not only be able to document what changes were made, but to also document why. Can anyone out there make recommendations on what change management tools they use or have used that might fit this bill? We are open to either open source or something modestly priced. Thanks, Jeff Wojciechowski LAN, WAN and Telephony Administrator Midland Paper Company 101 E Palatine Rd Wheeling, IL 60090 * tel: 847.777.2829 * fax: 847.403.6829 e-mail: jeff.wojciechow...@midlandpaper.commailto:jeff.wojciechow...@midlandpaper.com http://www.midlandpaper.com This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this electronic mail or its contents (including any attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete the original message in its entirety (including any attachments) and notify us immediately by reply email so that we may correct our internal records. Midland Paper Company accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage from use of this electronic mail, including any damage resulting from a computer virus. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Network Change Management
Maybe you want a system that enforces configuration workflow, such as LMS. There, you can comment each work order with *why* this is to be done. You have to enforce to have this documented before the changes are done, otherwise the operators will fail to comment ex-post, with increasing probability over time :) -- deejay -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeff Wojciechowski Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 4:18 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Network Change Management All: I know there are tools out there like RANCID that help manage configuration changes but we want something that will be able to be able to have a system that will not only be able to document what changes were made, but to also document why. Can anyone out there make recommendations on what change management tools they use or have used that might fit this bill? We are open to either open source or something modestly priced. Thanks, Jeff Wojciechowski LAN, WAN and Telephony Administrator Midland Paper Company 101 E Palatine Rd Wheeling, IL 60090 * tel: 847.777.2829 * fax: 847.403.6829 e-mail: jeff.wojciechow...@midlandpaper.commailto:jeff.wojciechow...@midlandpap er.com http://www.midlandpaper.com This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this electronic mail or its contents (including any attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please delete the original message in its entirety (including any attachments) and notify us immediately by reply email so that we may correct our internal records. Midland Paper Company accepts no responsibility for any loss or damage from use of this electronic mail, including any damage resulting from a computer virus. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Voice and nat
I hope this is where I have to post this question at. I have 2 routers. r1 is the router connected to the net via an ethernet interface, it is performing nat to exit to the world, and r2 is a router behind it and connects wireless users. r1 and r2 have a switch between them and few servers and end users are connected there. The ip addresses of the devices on this switch is 192.168.1.0/24. The ip addresses of the wlan customers is from 192.168.2.0/24. I have an asterisk Server connected to the switch having ip address 192.168.1.111. Customers are able to connect to the asterisk from the outside network and getting sip calls with no problem. Customers from inside the network, coming from 192.168.1.0/24 too. The problem is with customers connected to the wifi network. Sip is ok, but rtp isn't. Btw, all the customer are natted for getting to the internet. There is also some traffic coming from the internet natted to the inside ip addresses of the servers. Any Ideas? Thank You all. _ RadioMoris.Com - 100% Sega Music - http://radiomoris.com/?mo ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Cisco Nexus and Peer bit troubleshooting
Troubleshooting black hole issues again with the Nexus 7k. My question is.. is there a way to track when the peer bit is set/flagged so I can find when my packets are going nowhere? Thank you, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Multicast Manager
I have used CMM for through several iterations of the product (from 2.3 - 3.1). We had about 500 streams, MPEG 2, MPEG 4, video, music channels, etc for an IPTV platform. The latest release is a major improvement and it provides a great GUI so people could see the multicast flows. I preferred to log into the routers but was required to provide additional monitoring capabilities for other non IP staff. Ineoquests are extremely good as well, could also be extremely expensive. One thing to also think about is how many places you plan to monitor, traditional video people like monitoring everywhere, confidence checks, etc. Andre On Aug 17, 2010, at 2:19 AM, Tim Jackson wrote: The best box to monitor video with is an IneoQuest or two... :) On Aug 16, 2010 8:44 PM, John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com wrote: We have very large numbers of high-bandwidth multicast video streams to monitor. The product is not vaporware, it's sitting on my desk! We've had it for a while, but no one has had time to implement it. I'm the new guy, so it was passed to me. I was hoping someone here had experience with it. I just wanted to hear some opinions of it. I haven't had a chance to develop an opinion of it since I haven't seen it running yet. I'm hoping to get it installed this week. On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Tony Varriale tvarri...@comcast.net wrote: - Original Message - From: John Neiberger jneiber...@gmail.com To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 11:02 AM Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco Multicast Manager Anyone here running CMM? I've been tasked with learning about it and installing it. We've apparently had it for a couple of months, but no one has had time to get it up and running. I'd love to hear if anyone here is running and what your thoughts are about it. It looks like it should be useful for us, but the documentation is a little bare on CCO. I probably won't really know how useful it will be until I get it installed. I've never even seen a working version of it, nor have I seen any screenshots of it. I'm the new guy. lol This is the first time I've heard of it. It may be vaporware LOL! The customers that I have that really use multicast just monitor it via their network management station (via SNMP). Mind if I ask what you are using multicast for and what your interest is in such a product? tv ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ Regards, Andre Christian 720 961 4465 (O) 703 725 9925 (C) rooimanna (Skype) andre.christ...@o3bnetworks.com ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Network Change Management
Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:18:28AM -0500, Jeff Wojciechowski: All: I know there are tools out there like RANCID that help manage configuration changes but we want something that will be able to be able to have a system that will not only be able to document what changes were made, but to also document why. not the most efficient method and requires discipline, but one could annotate the CVS or SVN versions (cvs admin -m rev:msg file or svnadmin setlog -r rev file) generated by rancid SCM commits for documentation. you can also tag or branch to create named sets, such as replace_foundry. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Plea for [snip]
On 8/17/10 2:46 AM, Asif Gul Khan wrote: [snipped plea for charitable donations] By definition, this list is email. By definition, it is bulk. Pleas for donations for charitable causes, no matter how worthy, in my opinion and understanding of the purpose and charter of this list are by definition unsolicited here. Unsolicited bulk email by definition is spam. In the spirit of the Boulder Pledge, I would encourage the subscribers of this list to donate to charities that do not participate in or condone network abuse in their promotional efforts. -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Network Change Management
We have written an PHP page for running rancid for a certain device and adding CVS comments just like John noted in the e-mail before. By using this method you can make your configuration changes and afterwards run rancid and add comments to the config changes. This should help with adding the why factor to the configuration changes. Regards, Mark On 8/17/2010 5:51 PM, john heasley wrote: Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:18:28AM -0500, Jeff Wojciechowski: All: I know there are tools out there like RANCID that help manage configuration changes but we want something that will be able to be able to have a system that will not only be able to document what changes were made, but to also document why. not the most efficient method and requires discipline, but one could annotate the CVS or SVN versions (cvs admin -m rev:msg file or svnadmin setlog -r rev file) generated by rancid SCM commits for documentation. you can also tag or branch to create named sets, such as replace_foundry. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] BFD on SVI 12.2(55)SE
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 10:45:08AM +1200, Raymond Lucas wrote: Available now on ME switches... surely only a matter of time before it (re-)appears on other platforms... Unfortunately no documentation to go with it yet though. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/catalyst3750m/software/release/12.2_55_se/release/notes/OL23055.html#wp241488 Any news on BFD support for static routes? I've been expecting BGP+static for ages... :) Everton ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Plea for [snip]
On 17/08/2010 18:15, Jay Hennigan wrote: In the spirit of the Boulder Pledge, I would encourage the subscribers of this list to donate to charities that do not participate in or condone network abuse in their promotional efforts. Jay, I don't think you'd be saying this if half of California were under water (about the size affected in .pk), two thirds the population of CA were displaced by these floods, with 2000 dead, cholera breaking out, starvation looming for 6 million people due to the country's bread-basket being washed into the ocean and the United Nations calling it the worst humanitarian disaster in living memory. And another thing: given the circumstances, equating Asif Gul Khan's email with spam is nauseously crass. disgusted, Nick ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] Migrating to a 7200 for DSL aggregation
For the last decade, we've been using a Redback SMS 500 to terminate our DSL customers, delivered via ATM DS3. Recently, however, a few customers (as well as the partners of the company) have expressed a desire to bond 2 DSL circuits. Unfortunately, we've discovered that the customers who have Comtrend modems cannot negotiate LCP with the Redback when ppp multilink is enabled...after working through this with Comtrend, they demonstrated that the Redback is violating RFC 1990, and because of this and the fact that the Comtrend modem didn't support MP, it was unable to negotiate LCP. At the same time, we're starting to get a little nervous about relying on Redback as a platform, given that all the equipment we currently use is EOL and Redback has long since been acquired. We have spares, but clearly it's a deadend. So, we're investigating migrating to a 7200(VXR) platform for DSL aggregation. I was curious about a couple of things: 1) Given that Verizon delivers all of the DSL connections on a region-based series of UBR PVCs, what is the best way to bond two DSL circuits, given that they would not be on private PVCs? Is MLPPP possible in that configuration? Or would I need to do CEF per-packet? Given the archives on this list, I'm leaning toward per-packet CEF via radius assigned routes. I know we won't get ideal performance, but it should be an improvement over a single DSL connection nonetheless. 2) What IOS do people suggest for ATM DSL aggregation...the router won't be doing anything else other than OSPF. Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Plea for [snip]
On 8/17/10 12:46 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: I don't think you'd be saying this if half of California were under water (about the size affected in .pk), two thirds the population of CA were displaced by these floods, with 2000 dead, cholera breaking out, starvation looming for 6 million people due to the country's bread-basket being washed into the ocean and the United Nations calling it the worst humanitarian disaster in living memory. And the situation is very well publicized worldwide. Network news, print newspapers, radio, television, portal sites such as Yahoo and CNN, Red Cross campaigns, etc. I very seriously doubt that anyone on this list is learning about the situation here for the first time. And another thing: given the circumstances, equating Asif Gul Khan's email with spam is nauseously crass. If Asif and the rest of us are members of multiple technical lists, would it be appropriate for all of us to see this same message over and over on each of them? And if others are in the affected area, is it appropriate for each of them to post similar pleas to each and every mailing list to which they belong, regardless of the purpose of the list? As a data point, according to the archives this is the first and only post Asif has made to the list in over a year. I only checked back as far as August 2009. disgusted, It is a slippery slope. His is a worthy cause. People are in need, no question about it. However if everyone with a worthy cause posted to every unrelated forum, the signal-to-noise would become overwhelming. Where would you draw the line? -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Engineering - j...@impulse.net Impulse Internet Service - http://www.impulse.net/ Your local telephone and internet company - 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Plea for [snip]
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:44:20 -0700 Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote: It is a slippery slope. His is a worthy cause. People are in need, no question about it. However if everyone with a worthy cause posted to every unrelated forum, the signal-to-noise would become overwhelming. I would rather know how infrastructure problems are currently handled there, specifically telecommunication. My encounters in the western world are kind of soft in flooding/storm situations. Even Haiti was not that hard as pre-earthquake infrastructure was pretty good opposed to Pakistan, but still challenging organizational-wise. Although this is off-topic too, it's more related to our daily work. -- kind regards, dominik. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] OT: Plea for [snip]
Oh I'd definitely draw the line at this single post about a mediocre cause, Jay. I couldn't even fathom how quickly the world would crumble if he did it on more than one technical mailing list! That would be worse than say - I don't know - a natural disaster in Pakistan!! ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Nexus and Peer bit troubleshooting
On 18/08/2010, at 1:24 AM, Jmail Clist wrote: Troubleshooting black hole issues again with the Nexus 7k. My question is.. is there a way to track when the peer bit is set/flagged so I can find when my packets are going nowhere? no idea what you mean by peer bit. contact me off list with some details on what problems you're having and who you are, i'll be more than happy to assist. cheers, lincoln. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips
Guys, Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch connection) - I thought that setting speed auto would solve it. R3# *Mar 1 00:12:08.323: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console *Mar 1 00:12:10.027: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/0, changed state t o up *Mar 1 00:12:11.027: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthern et0/0, changed state to up *Mar 1 00:12:23.527: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:24.079: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:26.295: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:13:10.571: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). R3# R3# *Mar 1 00:13:59.455: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). Rgs, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips
Do you have two Cisco devices separated by a non-Cisco device? Imagine this: A B --- C A and C are Cisco devices, B is not. If B is a switch or a hub, it will pass CDP frames from A to C, which can cause these weird mismatches. It's not really a mismatch because A and C are not actually directly connected. CDP just thinks they are because B is letting them pass through transparently. Is that what's happening in your situation? On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch connection) - I thought that setting speed auto would solve it. R3# *Mar 1 00:12:08.323: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console *Mar 1 00:12:10.027: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/0, changed state t o up *Mar 1 00:12:11.027: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthern et0/0, changed state to up *Mar 1 00:12:23.527: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:24.079: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:26.295: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:13:10.571: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). R3# R3# *Mar 1 00:13:59.455: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). Rgs, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-...@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips
Verify duplex and speed configurations on interface, the rule is: autoXauto, forcedXforced. If problem not solve, disable cdp. Att, AB 2010/8/17 Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com: Guys, Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch connection) - I thought that setting speed auto would solve it. R3# *Mar 1 00:12:08.323: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console *Mar 1 00:12:10.027: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/0, changed state t o up *Mar 1 00:12:11.027: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthern et0/0, changed state to up *Mar 1 00:12:23.527: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:24.079: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:26.295: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:13:10.571: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). R3# R3# *Mar 1 00:13:59.455: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). Rgs, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-...@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips
Jeff, use the 'show interface FastEthernet0/0' command on this router (R3) and see a problem: 'duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/0 ''(not full duplex)'' - this interface not operate in fullduplex mode.' Att, AB 2010/8/17 Alessandro Braga sandro.u...@gmail.com: Verify duplex and speed configurations on interface, the rule is: autoXauto, forcedXforced. If problem not solve, disable cdp. Att, AB 2010/8/17 Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com: Guys, Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch connection) - I thought that setting speed auto would solve it. R3# *Mar 1 00:12:08.323: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console *Mar 1 00:12:10.027: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/0, changed state t o up *Mar 1 00:12:11.027: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthern et0/0, changed state to up *Mar 1 00:12:23.527: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:24.079: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:26.295: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:13:10.571: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). R3# R3# *Mar 1 00:13:59.455: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). Rgs, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-...@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips
Guys, Thanks for all replies, googling it I came across a link at groupstudy from someone experiencing the same problem before when labbing up CCIE topologies. http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200701/msg01450.html I think it is a dynamips 'bug/weird behavior' , the way of getting rid of this issue is only disabling CDP, if anyone knows another way out, please let me know. rgs, 2010/8/17 Alessandro Braga sandro.u...@gmail.com Jeff, use the 'show interface FastEthernet0/0' command on this router (R3) and see a problem: 'duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/0 ''(not full duplex)'' - this interface not operate in fullduplex mode.' Att, AB 2010/8/17 Alessandro Braga sandro.u...@gmail.com: Verify duplex and speed configurations on interface, the rule is: autoXauto, forcedXforced. If problem not solve, disable cdp. Att, AB 2010/8/17 Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com: Guys, Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch connection) - I thought that setting speed auto would solve it. R3# *Mar 1 00:12:08.323: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console *Mar 1 00:12:10.027: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/0, changed state t o up *Mar 1 00:12:11.027: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthern et0/0, changed state to up *Mar 1 00:12:23.527: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:24.079: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:26.295: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:13:10.571: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). R3# R3# *Mar 1 00:13:59.455: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). Rgs, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips
You would need to change the duplex (half or full) to solve this, not the speed. On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 22:03, Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com wrote: Guys, Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch connection) - I thought that setting speed auto would solve it. R3# *Mar 1 00:12:08.323: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console *Mar 1 00:12:10.027: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/0, changed state t o up *Mar 1 00:12:11.027: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthern et0/0, changed state to up *Mar 1 00:12:23.527: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:24.079: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:26.295: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:13:10.571: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). R3# R3# *Mar 1 00:13:59.455: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). Rgs, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Alessandro Braga wrote: Verify duplex and speed configurations on interface, the rule is: autoXauto, forcedXforced. If problem not solve, disable cdp. Also, while auto speed/duplex negotiation is fine for user workstation/PC ports in most cases, I recommend against using it on your network infrastructure if you can help it. jms ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] ASA 8.3
You may want to ask TAC for the latest Interim or disable SIP inspection if you don't need it and see if either helps. It may not help you, but in 8.0.5.x Cisco started mucking around with SIP inspection; perhaps to fix the security vulnerability. At one place in our network it broke some trunking traffic. At another it coredumped the firewall every few hours. While this is 8.0.5.something, although the same code has a way of finding it's way into other releases. As usual an update fixed it. On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Antonio Soares amsoa...@netcabo.pt wrote: I was asked about packet tracer output and maybe this is relevant. Packet tracer tells me that the packet is allowed but it doesn't show the output interface. The output interface is actually interface Ma0/0 that is used as a regular interface in this scenario. So i have this: Ma0/0 (inside, security-level 65) --- ASA --- G1/2 (outside, security-level 0) Regards, Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP) amsoa...@netcabo.pt -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Antonio Soares Sent: quinta-feira, 15 de Julho de 2010 17:28 To: 'Joerg Mayer'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASA 8.3 Now i'm confused. Don't know if this is a SIP or NAT issue: When it works: %ASA-7-711001: SIP::OPTIONS received from outside:x.x.x.x/5060 to inside:SIPSERVER/5060 When it doesn't work: %ASA-7-711001: SIP::OPTIONS received from outside:y.y.y.y/5060 to outside:SIPSERVER/5060 x.x.x.x and y.y.y.y are different sources. For some reason, we see that the SIPSERVER appears in the wrong interface. I don't see any explanation to this behavior. I've checked and double-checked all the NAT entries and this doesn't make sense. Any ideas ? Thanks. Regards, Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP) amsoa...@netcabo.pt -Original Message- From: Antonio Soares [mailto:amsoa...@netcabo.pt] Sent: quarta-feira, 14 de Julho de 2010 15:53 To: 'Joerg Mayer'; 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net' Subject: RE: [c-nsp] ASA 8.3 I see 5 SIP bugs in that list but they don't seem to match this issue. The link for those interested: http://www.cisco.com/web/software/280775065/33079/ASA-831-Interim-Release-Notes.html I forgot to mention but the SIP packets being dropped are UDP based. It's like a keepalive mechanism between SIP servers. The server in the Outside sends request:options and the server in the inside is supposed to reply with status: 200 OK. Thanks. Regards, Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (RS/SP) amsoa...@netcabo.pt -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Joerg Mayer Sent: quarta-feira, 14 de Julho de 2010 13:15 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASA 8.3 On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:14:01AM +0100, Antonio Soares wrote: I have a customer running 8.3.1 that is facing a very strange issue. Some SIP packets are silenty dropped. This seems to be random. The SIP packets are of type request:options. The source and destination ports are the same: 5060. The outside interface has an ACL permitting this traffic. We also have the default service-policy applied. Anyone has seen something like this ? Any ideas of how to troubleshoot this ? You way want to take a look at the release notes of the interim 8.3.1.6. Some SIP bugs seem to have been fixed between 8.3.1 and 8.3.1.6. Ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer jma...@loplof.de We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips
Jeff, probably your configurations dont are correct or the autonegotiation dont work properly, try put the shut and no shut commands on envolved interfaces. i dont remember of the any case this. Rgs, AB 2010/8/17 Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com: Guys, Thanks for all replies, googling it I came across a link at groupstudy from someone experiencing the same problem before when labbing up CCIE topologies. http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200701/msg01450.html I think it is a dynamips 'bug/weird behavior' , the way of getting rid of this issue is only disabling CDP, if anyone knows another way out, please let me know. rgs, 2010/8/17 Alessandro Braga sandro.u...@gmail.com Jeff, use the 'show interface FastEthernet0/0' command on this router (R3) and see a problem: 'duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/0 ''(not full duplex)'' - this interface not operate in fullduplex mode.' Att, AB 2010/8/17 Alessandro Braga sandro.u...@gmail.com: Verify duplex and speed configurations on interface, the rule is: autoXauto, forcedXforced. If problem not solve, disable cdp. Att, AB 2010/8/17 Jeferson Guardia jefers...@gmail.com: Guys, Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch connection) - I thought that setting speed auto would solve it. R3# *Mar 1 00:12:08.323: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console *Mar 1 00:12:10.027: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/0, changed state t o up *Mar 1 00:12:11.027: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthern et0/0, changed state to up *Mar 1 00:12:23.527: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:24.079: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:26.295: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:13:10.571: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). R3# R3# *Mar 1 00:13:59.455: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). Rgs, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-...@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 93, Issue 56
Hi there, Kindly provide the output of the show run int fa0/0 on RT3. Thanks. regards, YapCH http://itcertguides.blogspot.com/ Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 23:03:44 -0300 From: Jeferson Guardia To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Guys, Anyone knows how to solve this on dynamips? (router with lan switch connection) - I thought that setting speed auto would solve it. R3# *Mar 1 00:12:08.323: %SYS-5-CONFIG_I: Configured from console by console *Mar 1 00:12:10.027: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet0/0, changed state t o up *Mar 1 00:12:11.027: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthern et0/0, changed state to up *Mar 1 00:12:23.527: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:24.079: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:12:26.295: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). *Mar 1 00:13:10.571: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). R3# R3# *Mar 1 00:13:59.455: %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on Fast Ethernet0/0 (not full duplex), with Router FastEthernet1/3 (full duplex). Rgs, ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips
Guys, why no one read the 'dynamis' word on the subject? this is a particular issue being experienced on a 3725 being used as a switch on DYNAMIPS... it just doesnt work... 2010/8/17 Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org On Tue, 17 Aug 2010, Alessandro Braga wrote: Verify duplex and speed configurations on interface, the rule is: autoXauto, forcedXforced. If problem not solve, disable cdp. Also, while auto speed/duplex negotiation is fine for user workstation/PC ports in most cases, I recommend against using it on your network infrastructure if you can help it. jms ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
[c-nsp] PA-FE-TX Duplex
Is there any way to get a PA-FE-TX to autonegotiate duplex? Peace... Sridhar ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] Migrating to a 7200 for DSL aggregation
You haven't mentioned current and anticipated PPS requirement. If it's really just one DS3 then a 7200VXR with NPE-G2 should be fine, otherwise if your needs were 100+ Mbps and growing, the ASR1K, I'm told, is a good box. We use 12.2(31)SB18 -- the latest in that series, but only because of a resource bug that TAC said *may* be resolved in the latest release. Came across as just try. ;) I haven't implemented any MLPPP myself, but as your research in the archives has shown, it's not all roses. I'm guessing ADSL2+ pair bonding or VDSL2 aren't options? Frank -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Andy Dills Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 2:03 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Migrating to a 7200 for DSL aggregation For the last decade, we've been using a Redback SMS 500 to terminate our DSL customers, delivered via ATM DS3. Recently, however, a few customers (as well as the partners of the company) have expressed a desire to bond 2 DSL circuits. Unfortunately, we've discovered that the customers who have Comtrend modems cannot negotiate LCP with the Redback when ppp multilink is enabled...after working through this with Comtrend, they demonstrated that the Redback is violating RFC 1990, and because of this and the fact that the Comtrend modem didn't support MP, it was unable to negotiate LCP. At the same time, we're starting to get a little nervous about relying on Redback as a platform, given that all the equipment we currently use is EOL and Redback has long since been acquired. We have spares, but clearly it's a deadend. So, we're investigating migrating to a 7200(VXR) platform for DSL aggregation. I was curious about a couple of things: 1) Given that Verizon delivers all of the DSL connections on a region-based series of UBR PVCs, what is the best way to bond two DSL circuits, given that they would not be on private PVCs? Is MLPPP possible in that configuration? Or would I need to do CEF per-packet? Given the archives on this list, I'm leaning toward per-packet CEF via radius assigned routes. I know we won't get ideal performance, but it should be an improvement over a single DSL connection nonetheless. 2) What IOS do people suggest for ATM DSL aggregation...the router won't be doing anything else other than OSPF. Thanks, Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 --- ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] PA-FE-TX Duplex
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Sridhar Ayengar ploops...@gmail.com wrote: Is there any way to get a PA-FE-TX to autonegotiate duplex? Peace... Sridhar As long as both sides are set to auto, it should negotiate properly. ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Re: [c-nsp] full duplex mismatch speed - dynamips
Verify duplex and speed configurations on interface, the rule is: autoXauto, forcedXforced. If problem not solve, disable cdp. Also, while auto speed/duplex negotiation is fine for user workstation/PC ports in most cases, I recommend against using it on your network infrastructure if you can help it. I would have agreed five to ten years ago. However, nowadays we use autoneg everywhere with a few well known exceptions (e.g. Cisco 7200 with Fast Ethernet PAs). Autoneg simply gives us less problems. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
